Gender and the Politics of Exclusion in Pre

Cleveland State University
EngagedScholarship@CSU
The Journal of Traditions & Beliefs
Michael Schwartz Library
2016
Gender and the Politics of Exclusion in PreColonial Ibadan: The Case of Iyalode Efunsetan
Aniwura
Olawale F. Idowu
Osun State University
Sunday A. Ogunode
Adekunle Ajusin University
How does access to this work benefit you? Let us know!
Follow this and additional works at: http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jtb
Part of the African American Studies Commons, Continental Philosophy Commons, History of
Religion Commons, Oral History Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons,
Other Religion Commons, Social History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons
Recommended Citation
Idowu, Olawale F. and Ogunode, Sunday A. (2016) "Gender and the Politics of Exclusion in Pre-Colonial Ibadan: The Case of Iyalode
Efunsetan Aniwura," The Journal of Traditions & Beliefs: Vol. 2, Article 21.
Available at: http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jtb/vol2/iss1/21
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michael Schwartz Library at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for
inclusion in The Journal of Traditions & Beliefs by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact
[email protected].
Idowu and Ogunode: Gender and the Politics of Exclusion
Introduction
Therelationshipbetweentheusesandmisusesofhistoryisaverycomplexone.Misuse
suggeststhatthepastisinstrumentalizedanddistortedforpoliticalandotherpurposes.It
alsomeansthatthereisarealpastthatmustnotbedistorted.1
Muchhasbeenwrittenontheroleofwomeninnation-building.Thefactthatwomenwere
activechange-agentsinpre-colonialNigeriaisanestablishedhistoricfact.Whathasnotbeen
wellexploredaretheobstaclestothefullmanifestationoftheNigerianwomanasanationbuilder.
Intheresearchers’eagernesstoportraytheNigerianwomanasaheroine,extant
literaturetendstoover-emphasizetheirexploitswithoutcommensuratefocusonthesocialand
institutionalchallengeswithwhichtheyhadtocontend.
Thislacunaintheliteratureoftheroleofwomeninnation-buildingismostevidentin
specificliteratureonIyalodeEfunsetanAniwura.2Itisthecontentionofthispaperthatthis
literaturedoeslittlejusticetotherolethatEfunsetanplayedinthedevelopmentofIbadan.The
consensusseemstoportrayherasaverysuccessfulbusinessmagnatewhosewealthgotthe
betterofher,leadingtoherruin.3
Itisthecontentionofthispaperthatthisconclusionisunfounded.Thisscholarisofthe
viewthatgenderandthepoliticsofexclusionpracticedinIbadanwereheralbatross,rather
thanherwealthandwickedness.
TheoreticalFramework
Thispresentstudyishingedontwotheories.Thesearegendertheoryandthetheoryof
exclusion.Gendertheoryreferstohowsociallyprescribedassumptions,beliefs,andpractices
ofmalesandfemalesareusedtojustifyinequalitiesbetweenthesexesinfavorofmalesinthe
appropriationofpower,rights,leisuretime,andproperty.4Inotherwords,gendertheoryisthe
studyofhowmalesfacilitatethesubordinationofwomenbyappealingtosocialnormsand
values.Implicitingendertheoryisthefactthatmale-femalerelationsarenotconductedonthe
basisofequality;neitherisawoman’spositionatruereflectionofherpersonalworthandvice
versa.
Thetheoryofexclusionstatesthatgroupsinacompositecommunitycanmaximizetheir
ownbenefitsbyexcludingnon-members.5Thistheorybestexplainsgroups’competitionfor
scarceresources.Inthecourseofsuchcompetition,non-membersareseenas“outsiders”or
“enemies.”
IyalodeEfunsetaninIbadanHistory
EfunsetanAdekemiAniwura,thesecondIyalodeofIbadan,wasborninthe1820s.Shehadan
EgbaancestryasherfatherwasanativeofIkijaintheEgbaforest,whilehermotherwasIfe. 6
1GeorgeG.Iggers,“TheUsesandMisusesofHistory:TheResponsibilityoftheHistorian,Pastand
Present”(paperpresentedatInternationalCongressofHistoricalSciences,Oslo,Norway,August9,
2000),3.
2AweBolanle,ed.,“IyalodeEfunsetanAniwura,”inNigerianWomen:AHistoricalPerspective
(Ibadan:Bookcraft,1992),65.
3SamuelJohnson,TheHistoryoftheYoruba(Lagos:CSSBookshop,1921),393;ToyinFalola,The
PoliticalEconomyofaPre-ColonialAfricanState:Ibadan,1830-1900(Ile-Ife:UniversityofIfePress,1984),
79.
4JenniferBothamley,DictionaryofTheories(NewYork:Barnes&NobleBooks,2002),225.
5Ibid.,188.
Published by EngagedScholarship@CSU, 2016
1
The Journal of Traditions & Beliefs, Vol. 2 [2016], Art. 21
ShegrewupintheIkijaquartersofAbeokuta.Thereshehadanormalupbringingtypicalofthe
time.Sufficeittonotethatveryearlyinlife,shefollowedinthefootstepofhermotherasa
petty-trader.Inthisregard,sheusedtoaccompanyhermothertothemajormarketsin
Abeokuta.7Thisearlyacquaintancewithcommerceplacedheringoodsteadlaterinlife.
Soon,shebecameoldenoughtogointotradingonherownaccount.Towardthisend,
sheformedatradingpartnershipwithtwofriends,OloojaandYade.8Alongsidethisduo,she
embarkedonlong-distancetradingtoLagos,Badagry,PortoNorvo,Ikorodu,andIbadan.9Itwas
notlongbeforesherealizedthatlong-distancetradingwasmorelucrative.
SheeventuallygotmarriedtoafellowEgbainAbeokuta.10Asitturnedout,marriage
provedtobeanunsuccessfulventureforher.Thiswasduetoanumberoffactors.Ononehand,
shehadaproblemgivingbirth.11However,thepointisworthnotingthatwhilesomeaccounts
haveitthatsheneverconceived,somehaveitthatshehadonedaughterwhodiedyoung.12In
anycase,theproblemofchildlessnessputagreatstrainonhermarriage.Coupledwiththiswas
thestrainthatherbusinesscommitmentsmadeonhertime.Asaresult,hermarriagesoon
collapsed.13
Followingthisdevelopment,shegaveherselfwhollytoherbusiness.Shemadethe
fatefuldecisiontorelocatefromAbeokutatoIbadan.14Thequestionisworthasking:Whywould
anEgbatradermakeIbadanherbaseatatimewhentheEgbaandIbadanwereswornenemies?
Therearetwoanswerstothisquestion.Ononehand,shewasattractedtoIbadanbecauseofthe
hugeopportunitiesthetownofferedintermsofmarkets,security,accessibility,etc.Ontheother
hand,herdecisiontorelocatetoIbadanwasfurtherstrengthenedbythefactthathermaternal
cousin,BasorunOluyole,wasatthetimethedefactorulerofthetown.15
Propelledbytheseconsiderations,around1860,shemadeIbadanherhome.16Itis
importanttonotethatinIbadan,shesetupwithBasorunOluyoleatOjaOba.17Withthe
patronageofOluyole,aswellasherownconsiderablebusinessacumen,shesoonestablished
herself.Acoupleofyearsafterherimmigration,shebecamealeadingtraderinIbadanwith
commercialinterestsindiverseplaceslikeLagos,Badagry,Ilorin,Abeokuta,PortoNorvo,
Ikorodu,andothers.Shewasparticularlydistinguishedinthetobaccotrade,theslavetrade,as
wellastradeinweaponsandammunitionthatenabledIbadantocarryonitsnumerouswars.
ParticularlyofnoteisthefactthatitwasthankstoherindustryandpatriotismthatIbadan
continuedtohaveanadequatesupplyofwarmaterial,despitetheblockademountedbythe
Egba/IjebucoalitionagainstIbadanduringtheIjaiyewarandothers.18
OfnoteinparticularisthatEfunsetan’sexploitsinbusinesswerenotlimitedtotrading
alone.Shealsoengagedinmanufactureoffinishedgoods,someofwhichwereexportedto
6Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”67.
7Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”68.
8Ibid.,69.
9Ibid.,67.
10Ibid.,69;Johnson,TheHistoryoftheYoruba,393.
11Awe,“TheEconomicRoleofWomeninTraditionalAfricanSociety:TheYorubaExample,”
(paperpresentedatLaCivilisationdelaFemmedanslaTraditionAfricaine,Abidjan,July3-8,1972);
SaburiBiobaku,EminentNigeriansoftheNineteenthCentury(Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,
1960),40.
12Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”69;Johnson,TheHistoryoftheYoruba,393;LorandMatory,Sexand
theEmpireThatIsNoMore(Minneapolis:UniversityofMinnesotaPress,1994),19.
13Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”69;Matory,SexandtheEmpireThatIsNoMore,19.
14KemiMorgan,Akinyele’sOutlineofIbadanHistory(Ibadan:Bookcraft,1992),118. 15Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”70.
16Matory,SexandtheEmpireThatIsNoMore,19.
17Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”70.
18J.F.Ajayi,YorubaWarfareintheNineteenthCentury(Ibadan:IbadanUniversityPress,1971),
21.
http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jtb/vol2/iss1/21
2
Idowu and Ogunode: Gender and the Politics of Exclusion
America.19Notableinthisregardwasthemanufactureofmats,Kijipa,*traditionalcosmeticslike
Laali,**andothersbyhernumerousslaves.Similarly,shewasalsoinvolvedinfoodcrop
cultivation.Inthisregardshehadthreelargeplantationswherethousandsofherslaveswere
engagedinthecultivationofyams,cassava,andothers.20Asaresultofthisextensivebusiness
network,shewasveryprominentintheimport/exporttrade.21
Somesalientpointsofherbusinessactivitiesareworthyofconsiderationatthis
juncture.Firstisthefactthatherextensivebusinessinterestsconstitutedamajorcontribution
tothedevelopmentofIbadan.Forinstance,herfoodcultivationactivitieshelpedtoensurefood
securityforIbadan,whosemalepopulationwasmoreinvolvedinwarfarethaninfarming.
Similarly,hermanufactureandsaleoffinishedproductsalsoattractedmoretraderstotheOjaObamarketandotherIbadanmarkets.Moreover,italsotranslatedtogreaterrevenuetoIbadan
authoritiesintermsofmarketleviesandtoll-fares.However,mostimportantofallwasthefact
thatherextensivecommercialconnectionshelpedtoensurethatIbadanhadanadequate
supplyofEuropean-madeweapons.ThiswasmoresothestrategyoftheIjebuandEgba
coalitiontoblockIbadan’sroutetothecoasttodepriveitofsorelyneededwarmaterials,22but
thankstoEfunsetanandherlikes,wayswerealwaysfoundtobreaktheseblockadesand
smuggleinarmsandammunition.
AlsoworthyofmentionwasthecreditfacilitywhichsheextendedtoIbadanwarchiefs.
Inthisregard,longbeforeshebecametheIyalode,itwashercustom*tosellarmsand
ammunitiontoIbadanwarchiefsoncredit.23
BythenasoneofthewealthiestpersonagesinIbadan,shedeployedaportionofher
considerablewealthtophilanthropy.Inthisregard,shebecameapatronoftheAnglicanChurch.
Alongthisline,shedonatedtothechurchinIbadanregularly.24Moreinstructive,however,was
herpracticeofputtingupthemoneytosecuretheredemptionofnewlyconvertedChristian
slaves.25Throughthismeans,she,alongsidewealthywomenlikeMadamOgunsola,playeda
decisiveroleintheconsolidationofChristianityinIbadan.26Suchwasthewealthandsocial
recognitioncommandedbyEfunsetanatthistimethatwhenBasorunOluyoledied,shewas
madetheMogajioftheOluyolecompound.27ThiswasparticularlynoteworthyasBasorun
Oluyolewassurvivedbychildren,bothmaleandfemale.However,noneofthemcouldmatch
herwealth,popularity,orcontributionstothedevelopmentofIbadan.
UnderherwatchastheMogajioftheOluyolefamily,thefamilygrewbyleapsand
bounds.DistantrelativesfromIle-IfeandAbeokutajoinedthemselvestothefamily.Thus,
beforelong,everyavailablespaceintheOluyolecompoundinOja-Obawasbuiltupuntilthere
wasnomorespace.28
19Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”71.
*Locallymadefabricrenownedforitshardiness,likekhaki.
**Locallymadecosmetic.
*Itwasthetradecustomforprosperoustraderstosellwarmaterieltothewarchiefsoncredit.
20Johnson,TheHistoryoftheYoruba,392;Matory,SexandtheEmpireThatIsNoMore,19.
21JohnIllife,HonourinAfricanHistory(London:CambridgeUniversityPress,2005),80.
22Ajayi,YorubaWarfareintheNineteenthCentury,102.
23Falola,PoliticalEconomyofaPre-ColonialAfricanState,78;BolanleAwe,“WomenandWarfare
inYorubaLandintheNineteenthCentury,”inWarandPeaceinYorubaLand:1793-1893,ed.I.A.
Akinjogbin(Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,1998),126.
24Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetanAniwura”,74.
25Ibid.
26AdeniyiOroge,“Iwofa:AnHistoricalSurveyoftheYorubaInstitutionofIndenture,”African
EconomicHistory14(1985),79.
27Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”75.
28Ibid.,76.
Published by EngagedScholarship@CSU, 2016
3
The Journal of Traditions & Beliefs, Vol. 2 [2016], Art. 21
Withsuchapedigree,itwasonlyamatteroftimebeforethehighesthonoropenedtoa
womaninnineteenth-centuryIbadancameherway.Followingthedepositionoftheincumbent
Iyalode,Subuola,in1866shewasofferedthetitleofOtun-Iyalode.29
UponheremergenceasIyalode,shecameintothezenithofpublicresponsibilitythen
availabletoawoman.
TheFallofIyalodeEfunsetan:ThePlaceofGenderandthePoliticsofExclusion
By1873,aftertheAdowar,30thefortunesofIyalodeEfunsetantookaturnfortheworse.This
developmentfollowedhermisunderstandingwithAareLatoosa.Citinginsubordinationand
crueltytoherslaves,thecouncilofchiefshadherdeposedasIyalode.31Deprivedofhertitle,she
nonethelesscommandedconsiderableinfluenceinthepolity.Moreover,thedangerofhaving
suchaninfluentialfoewasnotlostonAareLatoosa.Consequently,hecontinuedtohoundher.
Towardthisend,shewassubjectedtoallsortsofindignities,allinanattempttoforceherinto
exile.Forinstance,shewasnotallowedanyvisitors,whiletraders,drummers,andotherswere
forbiddenfromtransactinganybusinesswithher.32
Refusingtobehoundedoutofthetowntowhichshehadcontributedsomuch,Iyalode
Efunsetanstoodherground.Rather,shetriedtoreasonwithneutralchiefs,givingoutexpensive
giftstotheminavainattempttoreconcileherselfwiththeAareLatoosafaction.This,however,
provedunavailingastheAarehadsethismindonherliquidationonewayortheother.33
ConfrontedwithherdeterminationtostayputinIbadancomewhatmay,AareLatoosahadher
murderedbysomeofherhouseholdslaves.34
Theallegationsofinsubordinationandcrueltyagainsthernotwithstanding,itisthe
contentionofthispaperthatIyalodeEfunsetanwasmerelyavictimofthepoliticsofgenderand
exclusionplayedinIbadaninthenineteenthcentury.Beforeexaminingthebasisforthisview,
thereisaneedtoexaminethebasisoftheviewthatIyalodeEfunsetanwasavictimofherown
arrogance,insubordination,andcrueltytoherslaves.
TheallegationofinsubordinationraisedagainstherbyAareLatoosawasinformedby
thefollowing:35(1)herrefusaltoaccompanyhimontheAdocampaignof1874;(2)herrefusal
tocometothetowngatetowelcomehisarmybackfromthecampaign;and(3)herrefusalto
sendhimsuppliesduringthecampaign.
ThefirstargumentthatherrefusaltoaccompanyhimontheAdocampaignconstituted
anactofinsubordinationisbaseless.Thisisbecause,asIyalode,Efunsetanbelongedtothecivil
lineofchiefsandwasthusnotobligedtopersonallytakepartinmilitarycampaigns.36Inany
case,thesameallegationwasnotleveledagainstTajo,theOtunBalewhoasacivil-chiefdidnot
accompanyAareLatoosaonhiscampaigns.37
Tosomeextent,herrefusaltowelcomeandcongratulatetheAareonhisreturnfromthe
Adocampaigncouldbesaidtoconstituteanactofinsubordination.
However,thethirdargumentthatherrefusaltosendhimsuppliesduringthewar
constitutedanactofinsubordinationlacksmerit.Thisisbecauseatthattime,AareLatoosaand
someofhisgenerals,especiallyAjayiOgboriefon,wereheavilyindebtedtoher.38Creditfacilities
29LaRayDenzer,“TheIyalodeinIbadanPoliticsandSociety,”inIbadan:AHistorical,Culturaland
Socio-EconomicStudyofanAfricanCity(Lagos:OluyoleClub,2000),202.
30Johnson,TheHistoryofYoruba,393.
31Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”80;Johnson,TheHistoryoftheYoruba,394;Morgan,Outlineof
IbadanHistory,119.
32Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”80.
33Ibid.,81.
34Ibid.;Johnson,TheHistoryoftheYoruba,393.
35Ibid.,391;Morgan,Akinyele’sOutlineofIbadanHistory,118.
36Falola,ThePoliticalEconomyofaPre-ColonialAfricanState,65;Denzer,“IyalodeinIbadan
PoliticsandSociety,”202.
37Johnson,TheHistoryoftheYoruba,386.
38Ibid.,393.
http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jtb/vol2/iss1/21
4
Idowu and Ogunode: Gender and the Politics of Exclusion
extendedtotheminpreviouscampaignswereyettobemadegood.Thus,IyalodeEfunsetan,as
abusinessmagnate,couldnotbeexpectedtocontinuetoextendcreditfacilitiestopeoplewho
hadnoinclinationtopaybackwhattheyalreadyowed.
TheotherargumentthatIyalodeEfunsetanmetherruinonaccountofhercrueltytoher
slaveshasnobasisinreality.Ifshehadbeencrueltoherslavesasalleged,afterherdeathnone
ofherslaveswouldhaveremainedinherhouseholdasher“children.”Thus,manydescendants
ofherslavescontinuedtoliveinhercompound,takinguphername.39Thisisparticularly
instructive,asshediedchildless.Certainly,reveringthememoryofa“cruel”masterisnotthe
waytoavengeoneselfonsuchamaster.PerhapsnothingdemonstratesbetterEfunsetan’s
humanetreatmentofherslavesthanthefactthatoneofherslaves,Ataiyero,laterbecamethe
OwaofIlesa.40AsarguedbyAwe,ifshehadbeenacruelmistress,thenoneofherslaveswould
nothavebeenwelloffenoughtoaspiretoandascendtheOwathrone.41Itisimportanttonote
thatBasorunOluyoleregularlyofferedhisslavesassacrificesinhiscolanutgroves.42Notonly
this,butheofferedhisfirstwifeasasacrificeoveratriflingoffense.43Yethewasnotaccusedof
cruelty,norwasanymovetakentodeposeorsanctionhiminanywayonaccountofhisilltreatmentofhisslaves.Itisimportanttonotethatthisisinlinewithassumptionsofthegender
theorythattherole,power,andobligationsprescribedformalesandfemalesarebasedon
differentsocialstandards.44
HavingestablishedthattheallegationsagainstIyalodeEfunsetanwerelargelybaseless,
itisnowimperativetoshowthatshewasavictimofthepoliticsofexclusionandgender.
Inthisregard,itisworthytorecallthatEfunsetanwasofEgbaandIfeorigin.Itappears
thatIbadanpowerelitesneverforgotthis,despiteherlongresidencyinthetownandvaluable
contributionstotheprogressofthestate.Frominception,theOyoelementsinIbadanhad
alwaysdisplayedatendencytoexcludenon-Oyointhetown.Anoteworthyexampleinthis
regardwastheexpulsionofMaye,anIfechiefwhowastheheadofIbadanatitsinception.45
Similarly,LaRaynotesthatfollowingadisputebetweenOyoandnon-Oyoelementsin1833,the
non-Oyoelementswerepoliticallymarginalized.46
Apartfromthis,IyalodeEfunsetanfellvictimtothepoliticsofexclusionrifeinIbadanas
aresultofotherfactors.NotableamongthesewasthefactthattheEgbaatthistimewere
Ibadan’smostimplacablefoes.Theyneverforgavenorforgotthedestructionoftheirhomeland
bytheOyo.Thus,theEgbanevertiredofanyopportunitytoharasstheIbadan.Apartfrom
frequentslave-raidingactivitiesandanti-Ibadancoalitionsthattheyenteredinto,theEgbas’
ultimateweaponagainstIbadanwastoblockIbadan’saccesstothecoasttoprocurewar
material.47Asaresultoftheseanti-Ibadanactivities,theIbadanneverhadcausetohavelovefor
anyEgba.ItwaswithinthiscontextthatonecanunderstandbetterwhyEfunsetans’splightwas
reallyonaccountofhernon-Oyooriginratherthaninsubordinationorcrueltytoherslaves.
Viewedagainstthisbackground,onecanunderstandhowAareLatoosacouldeasilymisreadthe
refusalofEfunsetantoextendfurthercreditfacilitiestohimasanEgbaconspiracytosabotage
Ibadanwarefforts,ratherthananattemptbyabusinesswomantoprotectherbusiness
interests.
IyalodeEfunsetan’scasewasfurthercomplicatedbythefactthatshecontinuedto
associatewithherEgbacompatriotsregardlessofofficialrelationsbetweenIbadanand
Abeokuta.Inthisregard,itisworthytonotethathercousinOgundipewastheBalogunof
39Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”80.
40Ibid.
41Ibid.
42Falola,ThePoliticalEconomyofaPre-ColonialAfricanState,27.
43Johnson,TheHistoryoftheYoruba,345.
44Ibid.
45Johnson,TheHistoryoftheYoruba,239.
46Ogunremi,2000:207
47Ajayi,YorubaWarfareintheNineteenthCentury,93;Morgan,Akinyele’sOutlineofIbadan
History,22.
Published by EngagedScholarship@CSU, 2016
5
The Journal of Traditions & Beliefs, Vol. 2 [2016], Art. 21
Abeokutaatthistime.ShewasalsoonfriendlytermswiththeReverendOlubioftheAnglican
ChurchwhowasalsoanEgba.48Thus,herEgbaancestry,coupledwithhercontinued
associationwithleadingEgbachiefsatatimewhenIbadanandAbeokutawereswornenemies,
castconsiderabledoubtonherallegiance.Thiswasfurtheraggravatedbyhertendencyto
celebrateandflauntherEgbaancestry.Forinstance,onbecomingtheIyalode,sherevivedthe
annualAlakijafestival,thenationaldeityofIkija,oneoftheEgbatownsdestroyedbytheOyo.49
ItisimportanttonotethatthepompandpageantrywithwhichshecelebratedtheAlakija
festivalrivaledthatoftheOke-IbadanfestivaldedicatedtothenationaldeityofIbadan.50This
naturallygalledthepeopleofIbadanandraiseddoubtconcerningherloyalty.
Asaresultofthese,therewerelegitimatesecurityconcernsthatshecouldbeafifth
columnistservingtheinterestofAbeokuta,herstateofbirth,ratherthanIbadan,herstateof
residence.Thus,itwasfeltimperativetoerronthesideofcaution.Conservativeelementsled
byAareLatoosathereforeresolvedthatIbadansecuritywasincompatiblewithhercontinued
residenceinthetown.Herinabilitytotakethecueandgointoexilesealedherfate.
ThepoliticsofexclusionpracticedinIbadanatthistimewerenottheonlyfactorthat
workedagainsther.Inadditiontothis,shewasalsoavictimofthepoliticsofgender
discrimination.Evidenceaboundsinthisregard.
NotableamongthesewastherefusaloftheIbadanstatetoplacetributarytownsunder
hercontrol.Inthisregard,itisworthytonotethatitwascustomaryforallthetownsand
villagesinIbadantobedividedamongallthechiefsinIbadan.51Suchchiefswereregardedas
BabaIsaleofthetributarytownsunderthem.Apartfromoverseeingtheaffairsofthesetowns
inthenameofIbadan,eachchiefwasexpectedtomaintainhimselfbytributesandlevies
collectedfromhistributarytowns.However,thisprivilegewasonlyenjoyedbythreeofthefour
classesofchiefsinIbadan.52Interestingly,theIyalodelinewasexcluded.53Thus,onlymale
chiefsenjoyedtheprivilegeofbecomingBabaIsale.
ForawomanwhosecontributionstotheriseofIbadanimperialismsurpassedthatof
manymalechiefsandrivalledtherest,thisarrangementwasunacceptabletoIyalodeEfunsetan.
Knownforherindependentthinkingandoutspokenness,shemusthaveregisteredher
reservationsinclearterms.ForapatriarchalmilitaryrepubliclikeIbadan,suchindependent
thinkingcouldnothavebeentakenlightly.Hence,itwasfoundexpedienttocutherdowntosize
topreservethegenderstatusquothatplacedmenabovewomenasofright.Thiswasmoreso
asEfunsetanatthistimewasthemasterofherhousehold,asshewasdivorced.Thus,sucha
powerful,prosperous,andindependentwomanwasathreattotheorthodoxbeliefsaboutthe
placeofwomeninthissociety.
OtherevidencethatshowsthatherruinhaditsrootsinthegenderpoliticsofIbadanlies
inthefactthatEfunsetan’sprivatearmydidnotenjoythesameprivilegeaccordedtothe
privatearmiesofmalechiefs.Inthisregard,itisimportanttonotethattheIbadanimperial
armywasacompositeunionofprivatearmiesrecruitedandequippedbyindividualchiefsand
well-to-doindividuals.Inthecourseofwar,theywereplacedunderaunifiedcommand.Atthe
endofthewar,thebootyofwarbelongedtothechiefwhoownedthetroops.However,onlya
tokenofthebootywasgivenoutasapresenttotheBaaleandtheBalogunastheall-reigning
commanders.Inthecaseofthehundred-manarmyownedbyIyalodeEfunsetan,thereverse
wastrue.RatherthanletIyalodeEfunsetandispensewiththewarbootycapturedbyherarmy,
AareLatoosaappropriatedeverythingandgavewhateverhepleasedtoEfunsetanashershare
48Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”81.
49Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”78.
50Ibid.
51Johnson,TheHistoryoftheYoruba,384.
52BolanleAwe,“TheIyalodeintheTraditionalYorubaPoliticalSystem,”inSexualStratification:A
CrossCulturalView,ed.A.Schelegel(NewYork:1977),210.
53Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”77.
http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jtb/vol2/iss1/21
6
Idowu and Ogunode: Gender and the Politics of Exclusion
ofthewarbootycapturedbyhertroops.54Thisdoublestandardisyetmoreevidenceofthe
genderpoliticstowhichshewassubjected.
Inthelightofsuchactsofgenderdiscrimination,IyalodeEfunsetansoonhadcauseto
reviewherinvolvementinaffairsofthestate.Shenaturallycametotheconclusionthaton
accountofhergenderandethnicorigin,herbenefitfromtheIbadanstatewasnot
commensuratewithhercontributions.Hence,shedecidedtogiveonlyqualifiedsupporttostate
projects,especiallyastheyconcernedwarsofconquest.
Theresultofthisresolutionsoonbegantomanifest.First,shedecidedtobemore
stringentinhercreditpolicy.Thus,sheinsistedthatchiefsstillindebtedtoherwouldnotenjoy
furthercreditfacilitiesuntiltheysettledtheiroutstandingdebts.Unfortunately,theweapons
andammunitionwithwhichIbadanchiefsprosecutedtheirwarswereusuallyboughtoncredit.
Whilesomeofthempaidontime,somehadbaddebtculture.Onesuchperennialdebtorwas
AareLatoosa,thedefactorulerofIbadanby1874.55Thus,thisstringent,newdebtpolicy
adoptedbyIyalodeEfunsetanearnedherenemiesinpowerfulplaces.Ratherthanseeitfor
whatitwas—i.e.,aninnocentattemptbyabusinesswomantocollectherdebt—they
convenientlyreadmeaningintoit.Itwasnotlongbeforetheyaccusedheroftreason,claiming
thatbywithholdingcreditfacilitiesfromthem,shemeanttosabotagetheirwarefforts.This
allegationhadsomeelementofplausibilitybecausetheEgbas,hercompatriots,weresomeof
thearch-enemiesofIbadan.
Herlaterdecisionnottosendherslave-soldierstoaccompanytheIbadanarmyonthe
Adocampaignlentfurthercredencetothismisleadingview,althoughshemadethisdecision
mainlytoprotestherunfairtreatmentinthedistributionofwarbooty.Itwasonaccountofthis
thatAareLatoosa’shandswerestrengthenedagainstheronhisreturnfromtheAdowar.The
stepstakenbyAareLatoosatocutherdowntosizeeventuallyculminatedinherdeathin1874
atthehandsoftwoofherslaves,atthebehestofLatoosa.56
Conclusion
Inthelightoftheforegoingdiscourse,theseveralconclusionscanbedrawn.Arrogance,cruelty
toherslaves,andinsubordinationdidnotruinIyalodeEfunsetanaspopularlybelieved.Rather,
shewasruinedbythepoliticsofgenderandexclusionpracticedbytheOyopowerelitesin
Ibadaninthenineteenthcentury.Herplightwastypicalofthefateofmanywell-to-dowomenin
pre-colonialYorubaland.Hence,LawandIllifenotethatwell-to-dowomenexperienced
difficultyinconvertingtheirwealthintopublicstatusandmalerespect.57Itisinstructivetonote
thatthisconclusionisborneoutbytheobservationofBolanleAwethattheprominenceofthe
Iyalodeinnineteenth-centuryYorubalandwas“indefianceofwhatwascustomaryand
traditionalamongtheOyo-Yoruba.”58
Towhat,then,canoneattributetheenduringimageofIyalodeEfunsetanasablood
thirstytyrantthatmethernemesisatthehandsofAareLatoosa?Theanswertothisquestionis
thatoneneedsnottoseekfar.Itisanestablishedfactofhistorythathistory,toalargeextent,is
theaccountofthevictorsofwars.Withinthecontextofthisdiscourse,thismeansthatmostof
whatisknownofIyalodeEfunsetancamedownfromhernemesis,i.e.,theOyoelementsin
Ibadan.ItisinstructivetonotethatanexaminationofthehistoriographyonIyalodeEfunsetan
revealsthatofthesixscholarswhohavewrittenabouther,onlyoneisnon-Oyoinorigin.59
54Awe,“IyalodeEfunsetan,”77.
55Ibid.,80.
56Ogunremi,2000,204;FunsoAfolayan,“MilitaryAlliancesinYorubaLand,”inWarandPeacein
YorubaLand:1793-1893,ed.I.A.Akinjogbin(Ibadan:HeinemannEducationalBooks,1998),410.
57Illife,HonourinAfricanHistory,80;RobinLaw,“LegitimateTradeandGenderRelationsin
NigeriaandDahomey,”inFromSlaveTradetoLegitimateCommerce(London:CambridgeUniversity
Press,1995),208.
58Awe,“TraditionalYorubaPoliticalSystem,”150.
59Johnson,The History of the Yoruba, 384..
Published by EngagedScholarship@CSU, 2016
7
The Journal of Traditions & Beliefs, Vol. 2 [2016], Art. 21
Interestingly,onlytheIjesha-bornAwedrewconclusionsthatcontradictpopularassumptions
aboutIyalodeEfunsetan.
Acknowledgments
ThisworkbenefitedfromtheresearchassistanceofDr.KemiAdeshina,aseniorcolleagueinthe
department.ThisworkisalsoindebtedtoDr.KoyaOgen,myHeadofDepartmentforhis
incisivecommentsinparticularandmentorshipingeneral.
http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/jtb/vol2/iss1/21
8