Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment Kurt Franke IMPRS-PTFS Evaluation Motivation High-precision test of CPT invariance in Baryons by comparing the proton and antiproton magnetic moments: µ p/ p = g p/ p qp/ p S 2 mp/ p g p = 5.585690 (24) g p = 5.585694713 (46) P. F. Winkler et al., Phys. Rev. A 5, p. 83 (1972). J. DiSciacca et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 130801 (2013). Experimental principle • Charged particle in magnetic field: Cyclotron Motion Spin precession νL B 1 q⋅B νc = 2π m νL = 1 g q⋅B 2π 2 m • g found as ratio of two frequencies • → Stable homogeneous magnetic field • → Long observation time 2 𝜈𝜈𝐿𝐿 g= 𝜈𝜈𝑐𝑐 The Penning trap Ideal Penning Trap Radial confinement 𝐵𝐵 = 𝐵𝐵0 𝑒𝑒⃗𝑧𝑧 Φ = 𝑉𝑉0 𝐶𝐶2 (𝑧𝑧 2 − 𝜌𝜌2 /2) Axial confinement Motion in a Penning Trap ν+ ~ 29 MHz νz ~ 700 kHz ν- ~ 10 kHz Continuous Stern-Gerlach Effect • Measure νSF frequency to flip Sz • “Magnetic bottle” to affect motion Φ M = −µ p / p ⋅ B ( Bz = B0 + B2 z 2 − ρ 2 / 2 ) Electron: ∆𝜈𝜈𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = ⋯ Electron in 28Si13+: Proton/antiproton: 228 kHz 4.4 Hz 0.17 Hz B2=300000 T/m2 Double Trap Technique Split up the work B • Detection of spin requires large B2 • High precision requires small B2 1 AT PT Drive until unambiguous spin transition 3 Determine spin state (spin flipped?) (Many cycles) 2 Measure νc Drive spin at νRF Pflip νRF/νc Implementation of BASE in the AD BASE approved by the CERN research board Installation of BASE in the AD during LS1 BASE Apparatus Detecting Spin State AT as spin state detector: A. Mooser et al., PRL 110, 140405 (2013). State estimator using Bayesian recursive formula: Fitting the Resonance • Bayesian parameter-based model selection – 𝑃𝑃(𝜇𝜇, 𝜎𝜎, 𝑛𝑛0 , 𝑛𝑛1 , … |𝜈𝜈𝑐𝑐 , 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑) – Numerically integrate out everything except μ – Uncertainty reduced by 30%! • First improvement in 𝑔𝑔𝑝𝑝 in over 40 years! A. Mooser et al, Nature (accepted) People/Funding Thank you for your attention!
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz