Microelectrode Demonstration of Wedensky Facilitation in Canine Cardiac Purkinje Fibers By John C. Bailey, Joseph F. Spear, and E. Neil Moore Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 ABSTRACT Microelectrode techniques were used to examine changes in excitability of canine Purkinje fibers at sites distal to complete conduction block. Immediately distal to a site where impulse propagation failed, it was possible to record subthreshold depolarizations. Intracellular stimulation of the Purkinje cells exhibiting these subthreshold responses with constant-current pulses of subthreshold intensity enabled full-amplitude, propagated action potentials to develop when the subthreshold stimuli were timed to occur during the slow upstroke of the subthreshold depolarization. This period of a decreased current threshold requirement for stimulation observed during the first 40—50 msec of the subthreshold depolarization was followed by a period during which suprathreshold stimuli were necessary to evoke propagated responses. Propagated action potentials which interrupted the subthreshold response during its repolarization phase demonstrated reduced maximal rising velocities. We concluded that summation of appropriately timed subthreshold stimuli could induce full-amplitude, regenerative, all-or-none responses and that the changes in excitability of subthreshold responses were not solely voltage dependent. Sodium inactivation appeared to be responsible for the depressed rate of action potentials that interrupted the subthreshold response during its repolarization phase and might participate in the coincident depressed excitability. KEY WORDS subthreshold depolarization conduction block regenerative depolarization excitability electrotonus threshold cardiac arrhythmias sodium inactivation • In 1886, Wedensky (1) demonstrated, in a neuromuscular preparation, that a strong stimulus produced a prolonged period of enhanced excitability of the nerve. Later, in a blocked neural preparation, he reported that excitability was temporarily increased distal to the site of conduction block (2). These two phenomena have been referred to as the Wedensky effect and Wedensky facilitation, respectively. The Wedensky effect has been demonstrated in canine cardiac tissue by Goldenberg and Rothberger (3) and in the human heart by Castellanos and co-workers (4). It has been suggested that Wedensky facilitation might account for certain cardiac arrhythmias in man (5-7), but its existence in the heart has never been proven. The experiments presented in this paper were designed to examine Wedensky facilitation in canine cardiac false tendons, and microelectrode techniques were used. From the University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Comparative Cardiovascular Studies Unit, Philadelphia, Pa. 19174, and the Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Marion County General Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202. This work was supported in part by U. S. Public Health Service Grants HL-04885, HL-06308, and HL-05749 and by grants from the American Heart Association, the Herman C. Krannert Fund, the Marion County Heart Association, and the Indiana Heart Association. Dr. Bailey's permanent address is Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202. Dr. Spear is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. Received January 22, 1973. Accepted for publication May 2, 1973. Methods Adult mongrel dogs of either sex were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg, iv), and their hearts were immediately removed through a lateral thoracotomy and placed in Tyrode's solution. Unbranched Purkinje false tendons 10-15 mm long and 1-2 mm in diameter were excised from either ventricle and pinned to the floor of a 50-ml muscle chamber. The preparation was superfused with modified Tyrode's solution (2.7 mM potassium), bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2, and maintained at a temperature of 35°C. An illustration of the preparation and the placement of stimulating and recording electrodes is presented in Figure 1A. Bipolar stimulating electrodes were located on the proximal (St r ) and distal (Std) ends of the false tendon perpendicular to the long axis. A third 48 Circulation Research, Vol. XXXIII, July 3973 49 TEMPORAL SUMMATION Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 bipolar electrode (not shown) was positioned on the midportion of the false tendon so that the poles of the electrode spanned the breadth of the false tendon. A zone of complete bidirectional conduction block 2-3 mm long (stippled area, Fig. 1A) was produced by electrocauterization of the false tendon via this third extracellular bipolar electrode; block was monitored by recording intracellular microelectrodes located in cells of the proximal (Rp) and distal (Rd) portions of the false tendon. A third intracellular microelectrode for both recording (Rm) and passing current (Stj) was inserted into the false tendon immediately distal to the area of conduction block. The method of using a single microelectrode for simultaneous intracellular stimulation, recording, and current measurement has been reported previously (8). The microelectrodes, drawn from 1-mm soft glass tubing, had tip diameters of less than 0.5ju, and, when filled with 3 M KC1, had tip resistances of 15-30 megohms. Conventional methods of signal amplification and capacitance neutralization were utilized. Data were displayed on a Tektronix 565 memory oscilloscope and recorded on an Ampex FR1300 analog tape recorder and on 35-mm film using a Tektronix 565 oscilloscope. A custom-designed, precision digital pulse generator1 permitted stimulation of one or both ends of the false tendon with either identical or different stimulus sequences. Concomitantly, a constant-current pulse, with amplitude, duration, and time of occurrence independently controlled, could be delivered to the impaled cell immediately distal to the zone of block. Figure IB illustrates the stimulus programs utilized in this study. The bipolar stimulating electrodes on the proximal (Stp) and distal (Std) ends of the false tendon allowed simultaneous stimulation of both ends of the false tendon five times (ST-S5) at constant basic cycle lengths of 500-700 msec; then the train sequence was automatically repeated. Excitability of the central cell could be determined at selected times in the interval between S4 and S t ; the S5 stimulus was omitted at either the distal or both ends when intracellular test stimuli were delivered. S5 was applied to the proximal end of the false tendon via Stp to test orthograde conduction block, whereas retrograde conduction block was assessed by delivering S6 to the distal end only. Once bidirectional failure of conduction had been established, diastolic current threshold requirements were determined for the cell immediately distal to the block (Rm in Fig. 1). The Ss pulse was omitted from both ends of the false tendon so that a steady, maximal diastolic transmembrane potential could be recorded from the central cell (R m ). Then, constant-current pulses 4 msec in duration were delivered intracellularly to that cell via Stj, and a stimulus intensity was determined that was slightly subthreshold for the entire diastolic interval of the central cell. We have termed this stimulus the "control subthreshold stimulus." To test changes in excitability of the cell distal to the conduction block, S5 was delivered to the proximal end of the false tendon via Stp but was omitted from the 1 Constructed by Murray Bloom, 116 Elmwood Avenue, Narberth, Pa. 19072. Circulation Research, Vol. XXXIII, July 197} distal end. This procedure resulted in the occurrence of a subthreshold depolarization at Rm. The control subthreshold stimulus was then delivered to the central cell via St, at numerous intervals following S5, and responses to the control subthreshold stimulus were monitored by Rm and Rd. Then, current threshold requirements at Rm were determined at numerous intervals following delivery of S5 to the proximal end of the false tendon via Stp. Finally, propagated action potentials were initiated at Std and timed to arrive at Rm at numerous intervals before and after delivery of S3 via Stp. The maximal rising velocity of phase 0 of these action potentials was recorded by electronic differentiation of phase 0. Results Figure 2 illustrates the activation sequence following establishment of bidirectional block. S4 and Si stimuli were delivered simultaneously at both the proximal (St^) and distal (Sta) regions of the false tendon. All-or-none action potentials developed in all three Purkinje cells (first and third responses) consequent to the S4 and Si stimuli. S5 was applied only to the proximal end of the false tendon via Stp, and this stimulus resulted in an allor-none action potential only at Rp. Therefore, conduction of this impulse failed within the zone of conduction block, and the eel] immediately distal to the area of block (R m ) responded to SB with only a 1st, S«n 7\ / st f I «m R d B FIGURE 1 A: Diagram illustrating the false tendon and the arrangement of stimulating and recording electrodes. The stippled area represents the zone of conduction block. St p and Stfl are proximal and distal bipolar stimulating electrodes, respectively. Rp and Rd are proximal and distal recording microelectrodes, respectively. ^ is the recording microelectrode impaled immediately distal to the zone of block. Stj indicates that an intracellular stimulus can be delivered to the cell through the recording microelectrode (Rm) by the use of rapid stimulate, record-switching circuits. B: Stimulus programs utilized in this study. Sj-S 5 could be delivered simultaneously to both ends of the false tendon via the proximal and distal stimulating electrodes (Stv and Stj. Intracellular stimuli (Stj could be applied at varying times between Si and St to the cell distal to the block (R^J. See text for discussion. 50 BAILEY, SPEAR, MOORE Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 5 0 mV 125 msec FIGURE 2 Documentation of orthograde conduction block. The S4 and Sj stimuli were delivered simultaneously at both ends of the false tendon via the proximal (Stp) and distal (Std) extracellular stimulating electrodes. The S 5 stimulus was applied only via the proximal (Stp) stimulating electrode. The cell proximal (Rp) to the site of conduction block responded to this S5 stimulus with a full-amplitude depolarization. The cell immediately distal (Rm) to the site of conduction block responded with a slowly rising, low-amplitude, subthreshold depolarization. The most distal cell, Hd, was not excited. Abbreviations are the same as in Figure 1. See text for discussion. slowly rising, low-amplitude subthreshold depolarization (second, small response in the middle tracing Rm). The distal cell (R^) was not excited, thus demonstrating that complete orthograde conduction block was present between Rp and R^. When S5 was delivered via Std alone (not shown), the distal cell (R d ) was activated, followed by fullamplitude depolarization of the middle cell (R m ). In this circumstance the proximal cell (R p ) was not activated, because retrograde conduction failed in the zone of block. We attempted to characterize the voltage and the time course of the subthreshold depolarizations resulting from failure of propagation of impulses originating proximal to the zone of conduction block. Only those experiments in which the central cell membrane demonstrated a maximal diastolic potential between —80 mv and —90 mv were considered. Because the width of the blocked zone was not known precisely and because impalement of the first fully excitable cells distal to the block was not assured, we can make only certain general statements about the subthreshold depolarization. The extent of subthreshold depolarization of the central cell ranged from 5 mv to 10 mv, and restoration of the maximal diastolic potential was attained after 200-230 msec. Maximal depolarization was reached after approximately 50 msec; repolarization required 150-200 msec. The maximal subthreshold depolarization diminished with distance, although subthreshold responses could still be recorded as far away as 5mm. In no circumstance did more distal cells demonstrate subthreshold responses of greater magnitude than those of the cells nearer the site of conduction block. When more severe cauterization of the false tendon was applied, subthreshold responses were never recorded in the distal segment. In Figure 3, S5 was applied only to the proximal end of the false tendon in a preparation in which bidirectional block had been established; subthreshold depolarization of the central cell ensued (middle, low-amplitude response). During the subsequent three sweeps of the oscilloscope, the control subthreshold stimulus was delivered intracellularly (Sti) to the central 'cell prior to (A), during (B), and following (C) the subthreshold depolarization. When the stimulus was applied Three superimposed recordings from the middle intraceUular electrode (RnJ used both to stimulate and record. The first action potential followed delivery of S, via the distal extracellular stimulating electrode (St^). The middle, subthreshold depolarization was consequent to delivery of Ss via the proximal extracellular stimulating electrode (Stp). The third record of superimposed action potentials was due to delivery of S, via Std. If the control subthreshold stimulus was applied intracellularly at times A or C, excitation resulting in an all-or-none response did not occur. However, if that stimulus was delivered at time B, an all-or-none response occurred. There was subsequent cycle length-dependent foreshortening of the action potential consequent to St. See text for discussion. Circulation Research. Vol. XXXlll, July I97i TEMPORAL SUMMATION 51 The minimum current intensity necessary to excite the resting membrane was 0.58 x 10~6. However, 13.5 msec after the onset of subthreshold depolarization, at a time when transmembrane potential had declined 3.2 mv, threshold requirements were reduced to 0.38 X 10~e. Once maximum depolarization was attained, there followed a period of relative refractoriness, when currents suprathreshold for the resting membrane were required to elicit all-or-none responses. Thus, a current stimulus Sufficient to excite the cell at a given transmembrane potential during depolarization was insufficient to excite the membrane at the same transmembrane potential during repolarization of the subthreshold response. Figure 5 demonstrates the changes observed in the maximal rate of rise for all-or-none responses interrupting a subthreshold depolarization of 7.8 mv. Propagated action potentials, initiated at Std, were timed so that they arrived at the central cell at various intervals during the time course of its subthreshold depolarization. The maximal rate of 9 a 320300- 6 280260- 3 2 LI 240- O.M.O.P. 1.0 220M.RV. ( Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 prior to the occurrence of the subthreshold depolarization (A), the cell was not excited. Similarly, when the intracellular stimulus followed repolarization of the subthreshold response (C), excitation did not ensue. However, when the control subthreshold stimulus was delivered near the peak of the subthreshold response (B), a fullamplitude depolarization of the central cell occurred, followed by conduction to the distal cell (not shown). If the subthreshold depolarization was omitted by deleting Ss at the proximal stimulation site (St p ) and the intracellular stimulus was applied at the same time as in B, no response at either the middle or the distal recording site (Rm or Rd) was observed. The zone of summation and facilitation began approximately 5 msec after initiation of the subthreshold response and persisted until maximal subthreshold depolarization was attained. Thereafter, as transmembrane potential returned to resting values, the control subthreshold stimulus was ineffective in producing summation. Current threshold requirements for evoking an all-or-none action potential were determined at numerous times during the time course of subthreshold depolarization. Figure 4 illustrates a representative strength-interval curve for a subthreshold depolarization of 8.5 mv. Qualitatively similar results were obtained in 12 separate experiments 0.9- 200160- 08160b 0.7 x 140" a. 0.6- 120- 0.5- 100- 0.4- 600 0.5 0.2- 700 80O 900 1000 TIME (msec.) 1100 1200 FIGURE 5 500 600 700 TIME ( msec. ) 800 900 FIGURE 4 Strength-interval curve for a subthreshold depolarization of 8.S mv. During the upstroke of the response, current threshold requirements were reduced. During repolarization, suprathreshold stimuli u>ere required to elicit all-or-none depolarization. M.D.P. = maximal diastolic potential. Circulation Research, Vol. XXXIII, July 1973 Maximal rising velocity (M.R.V.) of propagated action potentials plotted against membrane potential of a subthreshold depolarization of 7.8 mv. The action potentials were evoked at the distal stimulating site at various times so that they interrupted the subthreshold depolarization at different times. The maximal rising velocity declined during repolarization of the subthreshold response. M.D.P. = maximal diastolic potential. 52 BAILEY, SPEAR, MOORE Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 rise of phase 0 of each of these interrupting all-ornone action potentials was recorded. When the propagated action potential arrived prior to the onset of or following the termination of the subthreshold response, maximal rising velocity averaged 281 ± 6 v/sec. During the upstroke of the subthreshold depolarization, rising velocity remained essentially the same as it was for the resting membrane (271 v/sec). However, the maximal rising velocity of the action potential arriving 50 msec after the onset of subthreshold depolarization, when the membrane had depolarized 7.8 mv, was reduced to 129 v/sec. The maximal depression of rising velocity (114 v/sec) was attained 75 msec after the onset of the subthreshold response. Thereafter there was a gradual return of maximal rising velocity to control values. Similar changes in maximal rising velocity were recorded in ten separate experiments. Discussion In 1903, Wedensky (2) described a temporary increase in excitability of a nerve distal to a site where impulse propagation had been arrested. Although the impulse fails to engage actively the distal segment, the enhanced excitability nevertheless is a consequence of the blocked impulse. This phenomenon is commonly known as Wedensky facilitation. Blair and Erlanger (9) have subsequently demonstrated, in a blocked peripheral nerve, that two appropriately timed subthreshold stimuli delivered proximal to the block can activate the distal nerve by temporal summation during this period of increased excitability. Hodgkin (10) has confirmed these observations and demonstrated that electrotonic currents ahead of the blocked impulse produce displacement of the transmembrane potential toward threshold in the distal segment. These extrinsic potentials, so named because they resemble applied electrotonic potentials, are not propagated; rather, they decline exponentially along the nerve, Similarly, in our experiments utilizing segmentally blocked canine Purkinje false tendons, we also recorded increases in excitability of cells immediately distal to the site of conduction block. The period of enhanced excitability coincided with the slow upstroke of a subthreshold depolarization of the cell distal to the block. Furthermore, if a subthreshold stimulus was delivered during this time of enhanced excitability, a propagated action potential ensued. Thus, these data demonstrate that Wedensky facilitation can occur in cardiac tissue. The subthreshold depolarizations that we recorded distal to a blocked impulse in some ways resembled the extrinsic potentials of Hodgkin (10). In our studies these responses were never sufficient to elicit regenerative responses, although such an event is possible. Moreover, the magnitude of the potential and the net changes in excitability declined in cells more distal to the blocked impulse (11). The onset of subthreshold depolarization occurred immediately following block of the propagated impulse, and the initial rise of the subthreshold response was roughly exponential. Finally, the increase in excitability during the upstroke of these responses appeared to be voltage dependent, i.e., less current was required to fully excite the membrane because the transmembrane potential was nearer the threshold potential. The subthreshold responses that we recorded were further characterized by a period of partial refractoriness; during this time a stronger suprathreshold stimulus was required to elicit full excitation. Thus, at a given transmembrane potential during the depolarization phase of the subthreshold responses, a stimulus subthreshold for the resting membrane was sufficient to excite, whereas, at the same transmembrane potential during repolarization of the response, a stimulus suprathreshold for the resting membrane was necessary to produce propagated action potentials. Moreover, this period of partial refractoriness corresponded to a time when the maximal rate of rise of phase 0 of entering action potentials was severely depressed. Inasmuch as the maximal rate of depolarization indicates the ability of the cell membrane to undergo an increase in sodium permeability (12, 13), the observation of a reduced rate of depolarization strongly suggests sodium inactivation during this period of relative refractoriness. We did not observe slowed or blocked conduction of the action potentials which interrupted the subthreshold response at a time when current threshold requirements were increased and when the maximal rising velocity of the entering action potentials was reduced. However, such alterations of conduction might occur if the safety factor for propagation of the entering action potential is diminished. We have demonstrated that temporal summation of two subthreshold events distal to a site of conduction block in false tendons can elicit propagated action potentials. It is possible that the occurrence in cardiac tissue of subthreshold depolarizations demonstrating periods of enhanced, then Circulation Research, Vol. XXXlll, July 1973 TEMPORAL SUMMATION depressed, excitability may prove to be important in the genesis of certain arrhythmias, The period of relative refractoriness may cause slowing or block of impulses with low margins of safety for conduction. The interaction of subthreshold stimuli in a small area of structurally or functionally altered cardiac tissue may give rise to nonreentrant, nonautomatic, premature extrasystoles (5). Moreover, summation of this type may participate in reentry at the level of syncytial connections (14).. Acknowledgment The authors are grateful for the expert technical assistance of Mr. Ralph Iannuzzi. References Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 1. WEDENSKY, N.E.: t)ber die Beziehung zwischen Reizung und Erregung im Tetanus. Akademie der Wissentschaften, Berichte 54:96, 1886. 2. WEDENSKY, N.E.: Die Erregung, Hemmung und Narkose. Pfluegers Arch 100:1-144, 1903. 3. GOLDENBEBG, M., AND ROTHBERGER, C.J.: TJntersuch- ungen an der spezifischen Muskulatur des Hundeherzens. Z Gesamte Exp Med 90:508-528, 1933. 4. CASTELLANOS, A., LEMBERC, L., JOHNSON, D., AND BERKOVITS, B.V.: Wedensky effect in the human heart. Br Heart J 28:276-283, 1966. 5. SCHERF, D., AND SCHOTT, A.: Extrasystoles and Allied Arrhythmias. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1953. Circulation Research, Vol. XXXIU, July 1973 6. FiSCH, C , AND KNOEBEL, S.B.: "Wedensky facilitation" in the human heart. Am Heart J 76:90-92, 1968. 7. SCHAMROTH, L., AND FHIEDBERG, H.D.: Wedensky facilitation and the Wedensky effect during high grade A-V block in the human heart. Am J Cardiol 23:893-899, 1969. 8. MOORE, E.N., AND BLOOM, M.: Method for intracellular stimulation and recording using a single microelectrode. J Appl Physiol 27:734-735, 1969. 9. BLAIR, E.A., AND ERI-ANGER, J.: Temporal summation in peripheral nerve fibers. Am J Physiol 117:355-365, 1936. 10. HODGKTN, A.L.: Evidence for electrical transmission in nerve; Parts I and II. J Physiol (Lond) 90:183-232, 1937. 11. WEIDMANN, S.: Electrical constants of Purkinje fibers. J Physiol (Lond) 118:348-360, 1952. 12. HODGKTN, A.L., AND HUXLEY, A.F.: Dual effect of membrane potential on sodium conductance in the giant axon of Loligo. J Physiol (Lond) 116:497506, 1952. 13. WEIDMANN, S.: Effect of the cardiac membrane potential on the rapid availability of the sodiumcarrying system. J Physiol (Lond) 127:213-224, 1955. 14. CRANEFIELD, P.F., KLEIN, H.O., AND HOFFMAN, B.F.: Conduction of the cardiac impulse: I. Delay, block, and one-way block in depressed Purkinje fibers. Circ Res 28:199-219, 1971. Microelectrode Demonstration of Wedensky Facilitation in Canine Cardiac Purkinje Fibers JOHN C. BAILEY, JOSEPH F. SPEAR and E. NEIL MOORE Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 Circ Res. 1973;33:48-53 doi: 10.1161/01.RES.33.1.48 Circulation Research is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 Copyright © 1973 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0009-7330. Online ISSN: 1524-4571 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://circres.ahajournals.org/content/33/1/48 Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published in Circulation Research can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document. Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at: http://www.lww.com/reprints Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Circulation Research is online at: http://circres.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz