TREASURE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
FOR
AS-NEEDED INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
SUPPORT SERVICES 2015-2016
CONTRACT NO. TIDA 2015-002
ADDENDUM No. 2
February 1, 2016
ADDENDUM No. 2
February 1, 2016
RFP for As-Needed Infrastructure Engineering Support Services 2015-2016
TIDA#2015-002
Please note the following clarifications and/or revisions to the As-Needed Infrastructure Engineering
Support Services project. There is no change in proposal submission date.
A. Pre-Proposal Meeting - Slides
The Pre-Proposal meeting was held at 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, January 28, 2016 at the Casa de
la Vista, 191 Avenue of the Palms, San Francisco, CA 94130. Attached are slides presented at
this meeting.
B. Pre-Proposal Meeting – Sign In Sheet
Attendance at the Pre-Proposal meeting was optional but encouraged. Attached is the Sign In
Sheet from this meeting.
C. Responses to Questions Raised During the Pre-Proposal Period
The attached responses to questions captures all questions asked as of February 1, 2016. The
final date to submit questions is February 4, 2016 and all questions should be in writing to
[email protected].
Please acknowledge receipt of this Addendum No. 2 with your proposal.
END OF DOCUMENT
Treasure Island Development Authority
RFP for
As Needed Infrastructure Engineering
Support Services 2015-2016
CONTRACT NO. TIDA 2015-002
Pre-Proposal Meeting
January 28, 2016
Agenda
 Introduction and General Information
 Summary and Overview of the Project
 Background
 Scope of Services
 Submission Requirements
 Questions and Answers
General Information

No new information presented other than what is in RFP.

If there are any discrepancies between the information
provided at the Pre-Proposal meeting and the RFP, the
RFP will govern.

Inquiries must be in writing to: [email protected]

Written summary of questions asked and responses will
be provided as addenda
RFP Summary
TIDA is seeking a Consultant, for a one year duration,
with possibility for extension up to five years, to
support TIDA and TICD in facilitating City agency
review and approval of planned infrastructure
improvements.
The budget for this contract is $500,000/year.
Development Highlights
 Unique San Francisco Neighborhood
 Establishing a Regional Destination
 Leadership in Sustainability
 Creating Community Benefits /
Job Opportunities
Phased Development
•
•
•
•
•
• 4 Major Phases
• 18 SubPhases
8,000 units of housing
300,000sf of office
300,000sf of commercial
2 hotels
15+ miles of new streets
and infrastructure
Development Partners

Treasure Island Development Authority (TIDA)

A non-profit public benefit corporation formed in 1998 to oversee
the conversion of Naval Station Treasure Island to civilian use

Operates existing facilities on Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island

Oversee Navy environmental remediation programs

Implement Treasure Island Development Program development
program
Development Partners

Treasure Island Community Development (TICD)

Private development partner in the Treasure Island Development
Program implementation

Engaged since 2003 in planning the reuse of Treasure Island and
Yerba Buena Island

Responsible for design and construction of public improvements

Hold vertical development rights
Development Partners

Public Works serves as Lead Agency for distribution and
review of development plans

City agencies, including Public Utilities, Planning, MTA,
and others, review plans for public infrastructure
improvements

Disposition and Development Agreement between TIDA
and TICD and related documents are available on TIDA
website

http://sftreasureisland.org/approved-plans-and-documents
Background
 The first 290 acres of land was conveyed by the Navy to TIDA in May 2015.
 TIDA will transfer the development lots to TICD, and TIDA will retain lands for
streets, public open space, and affordable housing.
 Four development Major Phases are planned, approached with multiple SubPhases
in each Major Phase of development. Intial SubPhases are pending approval this
month.
 The Infrastructure Plan provides conceptual level framework for the infrastructure.
The Project build-out is anticipated to take over 20 years to complete.
 The Interagency Cooperation Agreement (“ICA”) between TIDA and other City
Agencies defines the framework for cooperation, and obligates City Agency review
and approval.
 The Design Review and Document Approval Procedure (“DRDAP”) provides for
expedited review of Agency applications provided complete applications are
submitted.
Current Status of Development
Milestones Reached
• 1993 – Naval Station Treasure Island (NSTI) listed for closure
• 1997 – NSTI closes
• 1998 – TIDA formed
• 2003 – TIDA enters into ENA with TICD
• 2006 – Development Plan approved by BoS, Mayor
• 2011 – Project Entitlements, DDA, DA approved by BoS
• 2014 – TIDA executes EDC MOA with Navy
• 2015 – First Land Transfer from Navy to TIDA
Current Status of Development
Milestones Reached
•
•
•
•
•
•
2015
• Streetscape Master Plan approved
• Signage Master Plan approved
• Major Phase Application approved
• Arts Program initiated
First Sub-Phase Applications – Under Review (to be approved by Director)
January 2016
Land Conveyance from TIDA to TICD – Closing expected February, 2016
Permits – Pending Approval – by COE, BCDC, RWQCB
Utilities and infrastructure – Planning complete, Design ongoing and pending
Approvals/Permitting
YBI Demolition – Contractor Selected– begin upon land conveyance
Scope of Services
Provide engineering and technical support services related to the
following:
• Conceptual Planning
• Existing Street and Utility Systems
• Mapping
• Land Transfers
• Infrastructure Improvements
• Open Space and Parks Plan Review
• Infrastructure Construction
• Vertical Construction Interface
Submission Requirements
 Submit a proposal including all the
items listed in RFP Response Submittal
Checklist.
 This RFP has a 25% LBE goal.
 Cost proposals must include hourly
rates.
 Submit Proposal per 4.F (with CMD
Forms and proposal only in electronic
form for CMD review)
Other Considerations
 Contract may be extended, for a maximum period of up to
five years.
 Scope of work to be issued as task orders.
Questions?
 Proposals due on February 11, 2016
 Submit questions on the RFP no later than February 4,
2016. E-mail to [email protected]
 Responses to questions will be provided in addenda, if
any. Addenda will be posted on OCA website.
 Clarifications?
THANK YOU
RFP TIDA2015-002
As Needed Infrastructure Engineering Support Services 2015-2016
Date
1
28-Jan
2
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS ASKED DURING PRE-PROPOSAL PERIOD
Question
Response
There is a 25% LBE requirement, and is there also a
No, there is just the LBE requirement. For projects directly contracted to
DBE requirement?
TICD, there is an SBE requirement, but for TIDA contracts, there is only
the LBE requirement.
Is the $500,000 projectiopn for one year?
Yes, this is a budgetary estimate for one year. This does not guarantee
any amount of work to be contracted with the selected consultant.
28-Jan
Is TIDA selecting just one firm to fill this role?
3
28-Jan
Is there a potential conflict of interest for a firm
submitting on both RFPs?
4
Yes, TIDA intends to pick on consultant firm or team to fulfill the role of
Task Force consultant. TIDA also has a separate RFP out to select two
consultants for As Needed Multi-Disciplinary Engineering and Technical
Services.
The potential conflict of interest may arise, for example, if the City is
developing a new WWTP and the consultant is preparing documents for
TICD, then it would be a conflict to be in a supporting role for pushing
the documents through the City agencies for review.
28-Jan
Is it OK to submit if not yet certified as a LBE?
5
28-Jan
This contract consists of planning, design and
construction?
6
28-Jan
Is a planner needed?
7
28-Jan
Yes, and consultant should confirm with CMD office. It is our
understanding that one can submit without yet being certified but that
the firm must be certified at the time of contract award, in order to be
awarded a contract.
Yes, all services are potentially involved and the tasks will likely be
staggered to have planning done on future phases while design and/or
construction is ongoing in earlier phase of work.
A planner may be needed to coordinate the work but for this contract, it
is not envisioned that the Planner would actually be doing the work,
more likely coordination and review of work by others.