INDIGO + E4I EFFICACY ON BRAIN, HEART + NERVAL
REGULATION: A PILOT HRV STUDY
METHODS:
Scans were completed on 6 clients, before and after INDIGO and E4I , sessions using a Dynamika Medical
HRV device to determine the efficacy of INDIGO on a series of health measures.
Dinamika Medical HRV evaluates all the regulatory systems of the body such as the autonomic nervous
system and its influence on the physiology and the heart, the central nervous system and brain. FRACTAL ANALYSIS
According to Global Health Solutions Training Guide:
This is an indication of how the biorhythms in the body are harmonizing. With the
fractal analysis you can forecast a patient’s health up to 10 days in the future.
T2 After
T1 Before
FRACTAL ANALYSIS
FRACTAL ANALYSIS
TEMPLATES
TEMPLATES
FRACTAL PICTURE
TEMPLATES
FRACTAL PICTURE
Results: A comparison of the T1 and T2
before and after images for fractal analysis
shows a 34.9%
improvement immediately
Golden Pathwa
Golden Pathways To Harmony
after
one
E4I
session.
TEMPLATES
The fractalRESULTS
analysis measure
be ANALY
anRESU
OF can
THE
indicator of the client’s overall immediate
Date:
24/05/2012 11
Name:
Name:
Terrey
Antionette
future health potential.
Age:
Comment:
Age:
Comment:
34
Additional data showed an overall age
reactivity decrease of between 8-12 years
on average using both INDIGO and E4I.
FUNCTIONAL STATE PARAMETERS
Overall health Indicators reflected
0.55
0.58
0.630.90 0.610.99
improvements of between 38-58% on
average using INDIGO and E4I.
K1 Before
DYNAMIC OBSERVATION
TEMPLATES
TEMPLATES
FRACTAL PICTURE
0.59
PULSE
FRACTAL
B Pathways
Golden
ToANALYSIS
Harmony
C A
63
B Pathways To
DGolden
...............
A - Adaptation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A. .- .Adaptation
. . . . . . . . .level
. . . .............. 55%
FRACTAL
.............
index
. . . . PICTURE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. .-.Vegetative
. . . . . TEMPLATES
. . . .regulation
. . . . . . . . index
. . .58%
...............
. . . . . .regulation
. . . . . . . . index
. . . . . .63%
C - Cenrtal regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C. -. .Cenrtal
...............
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .state
. . . . .61%
D - Psycho-emotional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D. .- .Psycho-emotional
a functional state
. . . . . .- .Integral
. . . . . . parameter
. . . . . . . . .of
59%
Health - Integral parameter of a functional state . . . . . . .Health
Doctor conclusion:
4:22 P
0:21 AM
RESULT
RESULTS OF
THE ANALYSIS
Doctor conclusion:
12 12:4
High adaptation
level
Lowered adaptation
Date:
24/05/2012
1:22:57 P
of vegetative
The systems
vegetative regulation
areKaren
in expressed
tension
The systems ofName:
Name: regulation
She
Sheiles
The central regulation mechanisms are normal The central regulation
Age: mechanisms50ar
Age:
50
state is normal . Th
normal activation
Psycho-emotional state is normal. The phase ofPsycho-emotional
Comment:
Comment:
THE FUNCTIONAL
STATE
OFNORM
THE O
NON-SIGNIFICANT
DEVIATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL
STATE FROM
THE
PRACTICALLY HEALTHY
ANOTHER MEDICAL EXAMINATION IS RECOMMENDED
24/05/2
0
12 11:3
24/05/2
0
Doctor conclusion:
Lowered adaptation^The systems of vegetative
regulation are in expressed tension^The central
regulation mechanisms are
normal^Psycho-emotional state is normal. The
phase of normal activation^^NON-SIGNIFICANT
DEVIATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL STATE
FROM THE NORM^ANOTHER MEDICAL
EXAMINATION IS RECOMMENDED
Doctor:
K3 After
HEALTH
TEMPLATES
TEMPLATES
regulation
B - Vegetative
M
FRACTAL PICTURE
A
FRACTAL ANALYSIS
FRACTAL ANALYSIS
TEMPLATES
K2 After
DYNAMIC OBSERVATION
FUNCTION
Doctor conclusion:
High adaptation level^The systems of vegetative
regulation of the organism are normal^The central
regulation mechanisms are normal. The activity is
high^Psycho-emotional state is normal . The
phase of raised activation^^THE FUNCTIONAL
STATE OF THE ORGANISM IS NORMAL. THE
ACTIVITY IS HIGH^PRACTICALLY HEALTHY
D
DAILY FORECAST
FUNCTIONAL S
FUNCTIONAL STATE PARAMETERS
0.41
0.45
Results: A comparison of the data shown in figure K1, K2 , K3
shows a0.38
positive change of0.43
just0.46
1% 0.60
immediately
Doctor:
Date:
24/05/2012
6:59:36
PM
HEALTH
Date: 24/05/2012 6:58:29 PM
following an E4I session. One hour afterward,
however, as the work integrated more fully, the HRV was
0.46
repeated and showed an improvement of 34.8% from K1 to K3!
PULSE
DYNAMIC OBSERVATION
DYNAMIC OBSERVATION
DYNAMIC OBSERVATION
A
B
C
A
D
B
89
iNDIGO
......................
A - Adaptation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A. .- .Adaptation
. . . . . . . . .level
. . . . .. .. .. .. . 45%
. . . . . . . . .regulation
. . . . . . . . index
.38% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B - Vegetative regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. .-.Vegetative
index
.....................
C
Cenrtal
regulation
C - Cenrtal regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43%
.....................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .state
. . 60%
D - Psycho-emotional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D. .- .Psycho-emotional
parameter
of
Health
Integral
Health - Integral parameter of a functional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46%a functional state . . . . .
S
Golden
Pathways
To Harmony
FRACTAL
ANALYSIS
FRACTAL ANALYSIS
Golden Pathways To Harmony
Golden Pathways To Harmony
VEGETATIVE REGULATION (Autonomic Regulation)
TEMPLATES
FRACTAL PICTURE
FRACTAL PICTURE
TEMPLATES
TEMPLATES
RESULTS OF THE AN
RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS
RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS
A tells about the adaptive level
the cardiovascular
system.
Date:of24/05/2012
1:22:57 PM
Date:
24/05/2012 2:31:30 PM
Name:
Age:
Comment:
Sheiles Karen
50
Name:
Age:
Comment:
Name:
Age:
Comment:
Sheiles Karen
50
Date:
24/0
Sheiles Karen
50
In normal patient functional states ALL A,B,C,D and HEALTH figures have to be in the range of 0.60 to
1.00 (60% - 100%) Golden
mathematical
calculation
Pathways To
Harmony of health.
Golden Pathways To Harmony
NALYSIS
After
K3OF
After
K1 BeforeRESULTS
K2OF
THE
ANALYSIS
RESULTS
THE ANALYSIS
TEMPLATES
FUNCTIONAL STATE PARAMETERS
FUNCTIONAL STATE PARAMETERS
FUNCTIONAL STATE PARAMETERS
0.68
While
K10.64
and PMK2
24/05/2012
12:44:22
HEALTH
show
a
relatively
small
increase
Name:
Terrey Antionette
0.46 34
0.53 following an
Age:
immediately
Comment:
E4I session;
one hour post
PULSE
PULSE
intervention,
DYNAMIC OBSERVATION
89
83 a second HRV
DYNAMIC OBSERVATION
scan
35%
C
D
A
B
CA
DB
CA
D B shows a dramatic
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80%
A - Adaptation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A. -. Adaptation
. . . . . . . . . level
. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .45%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A. -. Adaptation
. . . . . . . . . .level
. . . .. ..improvement
.. .. .. .. .. .. 46%
in
cardiovascular
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79%
. . . . . . . . . regulation
. . . . . . . . .index
. . . . ..38%
B - Vegetative regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B. -. Vegetative
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B. .- .Vegetative
. . . . . . . . .regulation
. . . . . . . .index
. . . .41%
index
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64%
. . . . . . regulation
. . . . . . . . .index
. . . . .. .. .. 43%
C - Cenrtal regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C. .- .Cenrtal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C
. . -. Cenrtal
. . . . . . .regulation
. . . . . . . .regulation.
. . . . .. ..64%
state
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68%
D
Psycho-emotional
. . -. Psycho-emotional
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .state
. . . . .. .. .. .60%
D - Psycho-emotional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62%
a functional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73%
functional state . . . STATE
. Health
. . . . . .-.PARAMETERS
. . . . . . .parameter
. . . . . . . . of
. . a. 46%
Health - Integral parameter of a FUNCTIONAL
functional state . . . . . .Health
. . . . . -. Integral
. . . . . . .parameter
. . . . . . . . .of. 53%
Integral
FUNCTIONAL
STATE
PARAMETERS
The T1 T2 data shows
a 35% improvement in cardiovascular
Doctor conclusion:
Doctor conclusion:
Doctor conclusion:
Normal
adaptation
level In both instances a simple
Lowered adaptation
0.55
0.58
0.63
0.61
adaptation
after
just
one
E4I
session.
Lowered
adaptation
0.90state of over-tension
0.99
0.91
0.98
of vegetative regulation are in moderate tension
The systems
The systems of vegetative regulation are in the
tension
The systems of vegetative regulation are in expressed
HEALTH
one
hour
automated
E4I
session
actually
mechanismsbrings
are HEALTH
normalclients from
The
central
regulation
The
activity
is
lowered
The central regulation mechanisms are normal.
The central regulation mechanisms are normal
state is normal. The phase of normal activation
Psycho-emotional
of lowered activation
Psycho-emotional state is normal. The phasePsycho-emotional
state is normal.
The phase
of
normal
activation
a
somewhat
compromised
cardiovascular
stress
state,
into a
0.59
THE FUNCTIONAL
STATETHE
OF THE
ORGANISM
IS NORMAL
0.95
NON-SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL
STATE FROM
THE NORM
NON-SIGNIFICANT
DEVIATION
OF THE FUNCTIONAL
STATE FROM
NORM
Golden
Pathways
To
Harmony
Golden Pathways To Harmony
PRACTICALLY
HEALTHY
ALYSIS
Golden
To Harmony
ANOTHER
MEDICAL EXAMINATION IS RECOMMENDED
FRACTAL
ANALYSIS
healthy
range, according
to Pathways
Dynamika’s
calculations.
FRACTAL ANALYSIS
ANOTHER
MEDICAL EXAMINATION
IS RECOMMENDED
0.45
0.38
Name:
Age:
Comment:
0.43
0.46
Terrey Antionette
34
24/05/2012 11:30:21
0.80 AM0.62
0.79
Results:
0.64
Date:
Date:
0.60
0.41
HEALTH
T2 After
24/05/2
0
12 4:17
:29 PM
T1 Before
Doctor conclusion:
DAILY FORECAST
DAILY
FORECAST
FORECAST
PULSE
TEMPLATES FRACTAL PICTURE
TEMPLATES
FRACTAL PICTURE
TEMPLATES DAILY
EMPLATES
TEMPLATES
PULSE
ms of vegetative Normal adaptation level^The systems of
sion^The central vegetative regulation are in moderate tension^The
SERVATION central regulation mechanisms are
is normal. The normal^Psycho-emotional state is normal. The
ON-SIGNIFICANT phase of normal activation^^THE FUNCTIONAL
Date:
24/05/2012 1:22:57 PM
Date:
24/05/2012 2:31:30 PM
STATE
OF THE ORGANISM
NAL STATE
A - Adaptation
level . . . . IS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A. -. Adaptation
. . . . . . . . . level
. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 55%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90%
NORMAL^PRACTICALLY HEALTHY
MEDICAL
Name:
Sheiles Karen
. . . . . .Name:
. . .regulation
. . . . . . . .index
. . Sheiles
. . .. .. .. .. ..Karen
.. .58%
B - Vegetative regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . .B. .- .Vegetative
Name:
Sheiles
Karen
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .99%
NDED
index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Age:
. . . . . . . . .index
. . . . ..50
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..63%
C - Cenrtal regulation
Age:
50
Doctor:
24/05/2012
.6:57:12
. . . . . PM
. . . . . . .Age:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
. . . . . . . . . . 91%
C PM
- Cenrtal regulationDate:
: 24/05/2012 6:53:44 PM
Date: 24/05/2012 6:56:15
A
Additionally, the data
63shows a drop in pulse rate of as much as
B
A
64
RESULTS
OF THE ANALYSIS
RESULTS
OF
RESULTS OF THE
ANALYSIS
C 17 points;
D indicating the E4I and INDIGO may have the ability
B
C
D
to reduce high blood pressure. This data reconfirms the data
collected by QBAA (2010) as well.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . state
. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 61%
D - Psycho-emotional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D. -. .Psycho-emotional
. . . . . . . . . . . . .Comment:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98%
Comment:
Comment:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .of. .a. functional
. . . . . 59%state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95%
Health - Integral parameter of a functional state
Health - Integral parameter
B tells
how well the autonomic
(sympathetic
and
parasympathetic)
Doctor conclusion:
Golden Pathways To Harmony Golden Pathways To Harmo
FRACTAL
ANALYSIS
FRACTALDoctor
ANALYSIS
conclusion:
nervous
systems are regulating.
Lowered adaptation
High adaptation level
FRACTAL
PICTURE
TEMPLATES
The systems
TEMPLATES
FRACTAL
PICTUREare in expressed tension
TEMPLATES
of vegetative
regulation
The systems of vegetative regulation of the organism are normal
normal
The central regulation mechanisms areThe
central regulation mechanisms are normal. The activity is high
The Psycho-emotional
first post state is normal. The phase
of normal
activation
FUNCTIONAL
PARAMETERS
FUNCTIONAL STATE PARAME
STATE PARAMETERS
stateSTATE
is normal
. The phase of FUNCTIONAL
raised activation
Psycho-emotional
E4I NON-SIGNIFICANT
intervention DEVIATION OF THE
FUNCTIONAL
STATE
FROM
THE
NORM
THE
FUNCTIONAL
STATE
OF
THE
ORGANISM
IS
NORMAL.
THE
ACTIVITY
IS
HIGH
0.45 IS RECOMMENDED
0.38
0.43
0.60
0.80
0.79
0.64
0.46
0.41
0.64
0.62
ANOTHER
EXAMINATION
Date:
24/05/201
measure
showsMEDICAL
only
PRACTICALLY HEALTHY
ERVATION
K1 Before
DAILY FORECAST
a 3% improvement in autonomic
nervous regulation. One hour
later, as the session integrates the
DYNAMIC OBSERVATION
DYNAMIC
OBSERVATION
improvement
is 41%.
A
B
AfterANALO
K2 After
RESULTSK3
OFRESULTS
THE
HEALTH
Name:
DAILY FORECAST
Terrey Antionette
Name:
34
Age:
0.46
Age:
Comment:
PULSE
CA
Terrey Ant
0.53 34
Comment: PULSE
89
DB
HEALTH
AC
83
BD
C
A - Adaptation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A. .- .Adaptation
. . . . . . . . .level
. . . .................... 45%
..........................
. . . . . . . . . . . . .A. .- .Adaptation
. . . . . . . . .level
. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 46%
. . . . . . . . .regulation
. . . . . . . . index
. . . . ...38%
B - Vegetative regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. .- .Vegetative
..........................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . B. .- .Vegetative
. . . . . . . . .regulation
. . . . . . . . index
. . . . .. .. .. .. .41%
. . . . . . .regulation
. . . . . . . . index
. . . . ........43%
C - Cenrtal regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C. -. Cenrtal
index
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..........................
C
Cenrtal
regulation
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
64%
6:59:36
PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .state
. . . ........60%
D - Psycho-emotional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D. .- .Psycho-emotional
..........................
. . . . . . . . . . . . .D. .- .Psycho-emotional
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .state
. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 62%
. . . . . .- .Integral
. . . . . . parameter
. . . . . . . . .of. .a. functional
46%
Health - Integral parameter of a functional state . . . .Health
parameter
of
a
functional
Health
Integral
state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53% state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
this Date:
instance
we see a 41%
24/05/2012
improvement in autonomic nervous
FUNCTIONAL
STATE PARAMETERS
FUNCTIONAL STATE P
Doctor conclusion:
Doctor conclusion:
Doctor conclusion:
regulation immediately following
one E4I session. Such
Lowered adaptation
Normal adaptation level
Lowered adaptation
0.55
0.58regulation areThe
0.63
0.61
rebalancing of the nervous
system
can affect
0.90
0.99 regulation
of vegetative
regulationalmost
are in The
the state
of over-tension
The systems
vegetative
are in moderate0.9
te
systems oftension
of vegetative
in
expressed
systems
mechanisms are normal.
activity
is lowered
central regulation
The central regulation mechanisms are normal
mechanisms are normal
The The
central
regulation
every other aspect of ourThe
health
and physiology.
The
HEA
of lowered activation
Psycho-emotional state is normal. The phase
state is normal. The phase of normal
Psycho-emotional
state is normal. The phase
of normal activation
Psycho-emotional
sympathetic nervous system
manages the
consumption
NON-SIGNIFICANT
DEVIATION
OF THE FUNCTIONAL
STATE DEVIATION
FROM THE OF
NORM
FUNCTIONAL
STATE
OF THE ORGANISM
IS0.5
NO
NON-SIGNIFICANT
THETHE
FUNCTIONAL
STATE
FROM
NORM
ANOTHER MEDICAL EXAMINATION IS RECOMMENDED
HEALTHY
ANOTHER MEDICAL EXAMINATION ISPRACTICALLY
RECOMMENDED
of vital energy; the parasympathetic
manages the energy
Doctor conclusion:
DAILY FORECAST
DAILY FORECAST
r conclusion:
DAILY FORECAST
saving
process.
The
data
indicates
PUL
Normal
adaptation
level^The
systems of that the body is
ed adaptation^The
systems
of vegetative
vegetative regulation are in moderate tension^The
tion are in expressed tension^The central
learning
to
utilize
energy
resources
better.
central regulation mechanisms are
tion mechanisms
are
6
DYNAMIC
OBSERVATION
DYNAMIC OBSERVATION
T2 After
T1 Before
24/05/2
0
12 4:17
:29 PM
In
2 6:58:29 PM
normal^Psycho-emotional state is normal. The
l^Psycho-emotional state is normal. The
phase of normal activation^^THE FUNCTIONAL
of normal activation^^NON-SIGNIFICANT
ATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL STATE STATE OF THE ORGANISM IS
M THE NORM^ANOTHER MEDICAL NORMAL^PRACTICALLY HEALTHY
A - Adaptation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A. .- .Adaptation
. . . . . . . . .level
. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 55%
...........
INATION IS RECOMMENDED
. . . . . . . . .regulation
. . . . . . . .index
. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .58%
B - Vegetative regulation index . . . . .B. .- .Vegetative
...........
Date:
24/05/2012
6:53:44
PM
Doctor:
Date:
24/05/2012
6:57:12
PM
Doctor:
Date: 24/05/2012 6:56:15 PM C - Cenrtal regulation index . . . . . . . C
. . -. Cenrtal
. . . . . . .regulation
. . . . . . . .index
. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..63%
...........
A
PM
iNDIGO
B
A
CB
D
C
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . state
. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 61%
D - Psycho-emotional state . . . . . . . .D. .- .Psycho-emotional
...........
. . . . .parameter
. . . . . . . . .of. .a. functional
. . . . . . . . state
. . . . 59%
Health - Integral parameter of a functional
...........
Healthstate
- Integral
Doctor conclusion:
Doctor conclusion:
TEMPLATES
RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS
RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS
Date:
Name:
Age:
Comment:
Bostock Kieth DunDee
65
16/05/2012 11:45:28 AM
Name:
Age:
Comment:
Date:
16/05/2012 1:51:00 PM
Bostock Kieth DunDee
65
C tells how the brain, endocrine and central nervous system are
regulating.
D1 Before
FUNCTIONAL STATE PARAMETERS
26
0.35
0.19
0.49
D2 After
FUNCTIONAL STATE PARAMETERS
0.19
0.68
0.60
0.62
C
D
HEALTH
The
client experienced a 41% improvement
0.60
in endocrine regulation, according to
Dynamika
HRV calculations, after just a
PULSE
one
53hour INDIGO session.
HEALTH
0.25
PULSE
A
B
CA
DB
72
This measure is also an indicator of how well
the endocrine system is regulating the body.
Primarily, it supports the fact that E4I is successful in retraining the physiological reactivity to both internal
onclusion:
Doctor conclusion:
and external environments,
as well as the responses of the hypothalamus and pituitary gland.
daptation level
Lowered adaptation
tion level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A. -. Adaptation
. . . . . . . . . level
. . . . . . . . . . . .26%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49%
tive regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B. -. Vegetative
. . . . . . . . . regulation
. . . . . . . . .index
. . .35%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68%
l regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C
. .-. Cenrtal
. . . . . . regulation
. . . . . . . . .index
. . . . . 19%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60%
o-emotional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D. -. Psycho-emotional
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . state
. . . . . .19%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62%
. . . . . -. Integral
. . . . . . .parameter
. . . . . . . . of
. .25%
a functional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60%
tegral parameter of a functional state . . . .Health
Golden
Pathways
To Harmony
L ANALYSIS
Golden Pathways To Harmony
Thestate
systems
stems
of vegetative regulation areFRACTAL
in the
of over-tension
of vegetative regulation are in
moderate
tension
ANALYSIS
down
of
the
central
regulation
The
central
regulation
mechanisms
mechanisms
are
normal.
The
activity
is lowered
RE
TEMPLATES
TEMPLATES
FRACTAL PICTURE
TEMPLATES
are signs of depression
Psycho-emotional state is normal. The phase of normal activation
UNCTIONAL STATE OF THE ORGANISM
NON-SIGNIFICANT
DOESN`T MEET
DEVIATION
THE NORM
OF THE FUNCTIONAL STATE FROM THE NORM
IONAL INSPECTION IS RECOMMENDED
ANOTHER MEDICAL EXAMINATION IS RECOMMENDED
There is evidence then that improvements in the functional response of major glands and organs associated
with the endocrine system: kidneys, liver, adrenals,
pancreas,
thyroid, gonads, ovaries and
RESULTS
OFthymus,
THEspleen,
ANALYSIS
RESULTS
OF THE ANALYSIS
DAILY
FORECAST
DAILY
FORECAST
more. Systemic improvements in immune function, reproductive health,
and16/05/2012
digestion
may
Date:
11:45:28
AMalso be correlated.
Name:
Age:
Comment:
Bostock Kieth DunDee
65
Date:
Name:
Age:
Comment:
16/05/2012 1:51:00 P
Bostock Kieth DunDee
65
D tells about the patient’s psycho-emotional state/ eeg.
Date:
D1 Before
19/05/2012 12:41:51 P
FUNCTIONAL STATE PARAMETERS
The greatest increase seen in this 0.26
data set was
0.35for psychoemotional state. The results showed that one INDIGO
session produced a 43% improvement! 0.19
0.49
0.19
0.68
D2 After
FUNCTIONAL STATE PARAMETERS
HEALTH
0.60
0.62
HEALTH
0.25
PULSE
0.60
16/05/2
012 1:5
1:00 PM
The indicator of psycho emotional regulation is also
OBSERVATION
72
DYNAMIC OBSERVATION
closely associated
with brain function overall. Emotions
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
are closely correlated with brainwave
patterns,
A - Adaptation level
. . . . . . . . . .according
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .A. -. Adaptation
. . . . . . . . . level
. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..26%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49%
B - Vegetative regulation index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B. .- .Vegetative
. . . . . . . . regulation
. . . . . . . . .index
. . . . ..35%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68%
C - Cenrtal
regulation
index .up
. . . . .into
. . . . . . .the
. . . .C
. . -. Cenrtal
. . . . . . regulation
. . . . . . . . .index
. . . . .. .. .. 19%
to Dynamika studies. When
clients
move
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60%
D - Psycho-emotional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D. -. .Psycho-emotional
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . state
. . . . .. .. .. .19%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62%
parameter
of a functional
. . . . . -. Integral
. . . . . . .parameter
. . . . . . . . .of. .a.25%
- Integral
“healthy range” of 60-100 it isHealth
much
more
likely
thatstate
the. .Health
functional state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60%
Doctor conclusion:
Doctor conclusion:
EEG will also show healthy patterns.
A
reduction
of
such
Low adaptation level
Lowered adaptation
Theas
systems
of
vegetative
regulation are in
thesystems
state of of
over-tension
The
vegetative regulation are in moderate tension
delta, beta and theta imbalances
can
lead
to
symptoms
Break-down of the central regulation mechanisms
The central regulation mechanisms are normal. The activity is lowered
of insomnia, ADHD, PTSD and
more
is also
correlated. Psycho-emotional state is normal. The phase of normal activation
of depression
There
are signs
PULSE
53
THE FUNCTIONAL STATE OF THE ORGANISM
DOESN`T MEET
THE NORM
NON-SIGNIFICANT
DEVIATION
OF THE FUNCTIONAL STATE FROM THE NORM
ADDITIONAL INSPECTION IS RECOMMENDED
ANOTHER MEDICAL EXAMINATION IS RECOMMENDED
DAILY FORECAST
octor conclusion:
owered adaptation^The systems of vegetative
egulation are in moderate tension^The central
on
egulation
mechanisms are normal. The activity is
wered^Psycho-emotional state is normal. The
E
hase of normal activation^^NON-SIGNIFICANT
EVIATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL STATE
ROM THE NORM^ANOTHER MEDICAL
Date:
Doctor:
19/05/2012 12:40:48 P
Date:
DAILY FORECAST
19/05/2012 12:41:51 P
iNDIGO
SIS
VARIATION ANALYSIS
ead
VARIATION ANALYSIS
NEURODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
ECG WAVE FRAME
ECG from the I standard lead
ECG from the I standard lead
NEURODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
ECG WAVE FRAME
43%
57%
C1
C2
B1 (Present time) Is what the patient has right now as far as
sympathetic and parasympathetic regulation.
RHYTHMOGRAM
PQRST
RHYTHMOGRAMPQRST
PQRST
NEURODYN
ECG WAVE FRAME
64%
59%
C1
C2
NEURODYNAMIC MATRIX
OF CODES
ENERGY PYRAMID
B2 (Capacity left) Should
be equalHYSTOGRAM
to 100%
or
just
below
B1.
B2
is the
ca-PYRAMIDHYSTOGR
NEURODYNAMIC
MATRIX
HYSTOGRAM
OF
CODES
ENERGY
NEURODYNAMIC
MATRIX
0%
0%
75
152 1.03 77
15%
59%
26%
74
158 1.14 84
0%
pacity of the regulatory system.
PR = 0.09 QRS = 0.10 QT = 0.28
PR = 0.09 QRS = 0.10 QT = 0.27
VARIATION ANALYSIS
K1 Before
S
K2 After
ECG from the I standard lead
d
aP = 0.10 aR = 1.00
M
RAM
38%
aP = 0.13 aR = 1.00
aT = 0.31
41%
aP = 0.18 aR = 1.00
63%
aT = 0.37
91%
57%
90%
44%
79%
38%
In figures K1 K2 K3 we
see a mild initialC1improveC2
PQRST
C1 - compensation
level .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C1
. . 43%
C1 - compensation level .. . . . . . .C2
. . . . . . . . . C1
. . . -. compensation
. . . . . . . . . . . .level
. . . . ...64%
. ENERGY
. . . . . . .PYRAMID
............
HYSTOGRAM
OF the
CODES
C2 - compensation reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .NEURODYNAMIC
. . . . . . . . . . . . .MATRIX
.57%
ment
in
B1
measure
C2 - compensation
. . . . . . .PYRAMID
. . . . . . . C2
. . .-.compensation
. . . . . . . . . . . .reserves
. . . . .59%
...................
NEURODYNAMIC MATRIX
HYSTOGRAM
OF CODESreserves ENERGY
0%
4%
96%
142 325 1.29 183
25%
52%
23%
75
152 1.03 77
immediately following an
BRAIN BIORHYTHMS CHART
BRAIN BIORHYTHMS CHART
BRAIN BIOR
B1
B2
B1
B2
FREQUENCY SPECTRUM
E4I session; but
one hour
FREQUENCY SPECTRUM
FREQUENCY SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
CHART
60%
36%
SPECTROGRAM
SPECTRUM CHART
later we see a big62%
spike65%of
41% improvement.
RHYTHMOGRAM
PQRST
PR = 0.07 QRS = 0.07 QT = 0.33
PR = 0.06 QRS = 0.07 QT = 0.32
B2
SPECTRUM CHART
SPECTROGRAM
T1 Before
GRAM
M
K3 After
ECG WAVE FRAME
SCATTEROGRAM
45%
aP = 0.18 aR = 1.00
NEURODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
NEURODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
ECG WAVE FRAME
aT = 0.37
SCATTEROGRAM
HYSTOGRAM
B1
PR = 0.10 QRS = 0.10 QT = 0.29
T2 After
aP = 0.14 aR = 1.00
aT = 0.52
aT = 0.46
SCATTEROGRAM
58%
99%
32%
AUTOCORR. PORTRAIT
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION
96%
D1
D2
D2
Figures T1 and T2 show a 41% improvement inD1B1 imSPLINE-MAPS OF BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY
SPLINE-MAPS OF BRAIN ELE
mediately
following
0.54
0.53 the E4I session.
0.53 AUTOCORR.
PORTRAIT
0.57
0.57
0.58
0.57
0.68
0.68
SPLINE-MAPS OF BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY
AUTOCORR.
PORTRAIT
0.53
AUTOCORRELATION
FUNCTION
C1 - compensation level .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91%
C1 - compensation level .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C2
. . .-.compensation
. . . . . . . . . . . .reserves
. . . . . 63%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90%
C2 - compensation reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57%
B1 is a reflection of vegetative
regulation,
specifically,
it
BRAIN
BIORHYTHMS
CHART
FREQUENCY
SPECTRUM
is
the
current
status
of
the
sympathetic
and
parasympaFREQUENCY
SPECTRUM
SPECTROGRAM
SPECTRUM
CHART
98%
88%
SPECTRUM CHART
61%
65%
thetic
nervous systems.
0.53
0.53
0.52
0.51
0.62
0.68
The B2 graph measures the capacity of the regulatory system, in 0.57
some respects 0.61
it can be considered
how
. . 89
[ 60 - 90 ]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Pulse
. . . . .rate
. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .83
[ .60
-. 90
] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
[
60
90
]
. 248.3 [ 35 - 145
]
much
overall
energy
is
in
the
battery.
Much
like
the
INDIGO
Voltage
scores.
The
figures
above
show
B2
ndex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Vegetative
. . . . . . . . .balance
. . . . . . index
. 257.5
. . .[ .35
. . -. 145
. . . .] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153.3 [ 35 - 145 ]
. .0.27 [ 0.25 - 0.6 ]
actor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Rhythm
. . . . . . vegetative
. . . . . . . . . factor
. .0.25. . .[ .0.25
. . . .-.0.6
. . .]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0.22 [ 0.25 - 0.6 ]
. . 67.5 [ 15 - 50
]
energy
indicate
improvements of 67% after an E4I session.
s adequacy indeximprovements
. . . . . . Regulation
. . . . . . . . . processes
. . . in
. . . overall
. . 63.3
[ 15
- 50 ] . . . regulation.
adequacy
index
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .T1-T2
. . . . . 34.0above
[ 15 - 50
]
. 194.0 [ 10 - 100 ]
B1
B1
B2
B2
BRAIN BIORHYTHMS CHART
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Tension
. . . . . . index
. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .178.8
. . . . . .[ .10
. . -. 100
. . . .] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76.6
. . 40.4 [ 50 - 500 ]
rrelation - Z . . . . . . . . . . . Parameter
. . . . . . . . .of
. .autocorrelation
. . . . . . 19.5 [-50
Z .- .500
. . . ]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87.3
[ 10 - 100 ]
[ 50 - 500 ]
D1
D1
D2
D2
SPLINE-MAPS OF BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY
SPLINE-MAPS OF BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY
PORTRAIT
The B1 B2 measure reflects theAUTOCORR.
Autonomic
Nervous System. The ideal
to see both
0.88 state for these
0.89 measures is0.89
sides in proportion. The T1 and T2 figures reflect the ideal state of balanced regulation of energy, as well as
ample resources of energy produced by an E4I session.
AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION
0.60
0.68
0.88
D1 - regulation level . 0.50
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0.50
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.49
. . . 60%
. . . . . . . . . 38% AUTOCORR. PORTRAIT
- regulation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .D1
.0.49
. -. .regulation
. . . . . . . .level
. . . . .. .. .. .. .62%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B1
. . -. regulation
. . . . . . . . .level
. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .41%
....................
. .-.regulation
. . . . . . . . reserves
. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..D1
.. .. 79%
D2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36%
. . . . . . . . . . 45%
- regulation reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D2
. . . -. regulation
. . . . . . . . .reserves
. . . . . . . .. .65%
ves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B2
. . . -. regulation
. . . . . . . . .reserves
. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .44%
....................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D2
. . 38%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
63 . . .[.60
ndex
. . -. .90
. .]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69.5
214.8
actor
. . .[.35
. . .- .145
. . . ]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0.40
[ 0.25
- 0.6. .] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27.6
s.0.22
adequacy
index
.. 47.9
. . . . . .[.15
. . -. .50
. . ]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36.2
116.7
[
10
100
rrelation - Z . . . . . ]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54.8
. 35.2 [ 50 - 500 ]
[ 60 - 90 ]
[ 35 - 145 ]
[ 0.25 - 0.6 ]
[ 15 - 50 ]
[ 10 - 100 ]
[ 50 - 500 ]
0.48
0.49
0.88
0.50
0.89
0.50
0.88
D1 - regulation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99%
- regulation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D2
. . . -. regulation
. . . . . . . . .reserves
. . . . . . . .. .61%
. . . .. .. .. .. .. .58%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88%
ves
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D1
. . 96%
D2 - regulation reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65%
. . . . . . . . . 32%
iNDIGO
0.91
C1- (Present time) This is what the patient has right now as far as
nervous system regulation.
C2- (Capacity left) This is the capacity of the CNS. It shows you
how much capacity the battery has.
T1 Before T2 After
ODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
In figure T1-T2 we see an improvement in the C1 measure
of 28% using E4I; while a similar improvement of 32% in
the K1-K2 figure results from an INDIGO session. These
measures were given immediately following sessions, with
no integration time.
NEURODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
ECG WAVE FRAME
63%
57%
C1
C2
91%
%
52%
The T1 –T2 figures show a C2 improvement of 33% after a one
hour initial client session with E4I. FIGURE K1 K2 shows
ENERGY PYRAMID
an improvement of 28% in the C2 measure immediately
142 325 1.29 183
NEURODYNAMIC ANALYSIS NEURODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
following an INDIGO session.
C1
TOGRAM
NEURODYNAMIC
OF CODES MATRIX ENERGY PYRAMID
HYSTOGRAM OF CODES
90%
C2
K1 Before K2 After
23%
75
152
1.03
0% 77 4%
96%
AMIC
SIS ANALYSIS NEURODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
ECG WAVE FRAME
lead
63%
ODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
57%
ECG WAVE FRAME
91%
NEURODYNAMIC ANALYSIS
ECG WAVE FRAME
90%
19%
15%
60%
54%
The C1 and C2 measures reflect the battery power and
ECG WAVE FRAME
regulatory capabilities of the Central Nervous System. CNS
19%
15%
60%
54%
functions include coordinating activities between the various
parts of the human body particularly the brain and spinal
cord. It also
playsC2a major role in controlling
the various body
C1
C2
C1
C2
C1
C1
C2
PQRST
M
functions
which
include
movement,ENERGY
sensation,
mpensation
. .OF
. . CODES
. MATRIX
. . . . . level
. . . . .... . . ENERGY
. . 63%
. HYSTOGRAM
. . . . .PYRAMID
. . .NEURODYNAMIC
. . . OF
. . .CODES
. . . . . . . . .MATRIX
. . . . .ENERGY
. . . 91% PYRAMID
NAMIC
HYSTOGRAM
NEURODYNAMIC
OF
CODES
MATRIX
ENERGY
HYSTOGRAM
PYRAMIDOF CODES
PYRAMID thinking,
mpensation
. QT
. . =. 0.32
. . . 23%
. . .reserves
. . . . . .75
. .PR
. .=C1
57%
.0.02
. . . QRS
. . .C2
.= .0.15
. . . QT
. . =. 0.33
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C1
90%
C2
52%
152
0% 1.03
4%77
96%
142 325 1.29
183 23%memory,
77%
0%
14
47
17%
2.36
65%
33
18%
53
143
90
and speech. In both cases, E4I and1.70
INDIGO
show
STOGRAM
NEURODYNAMIC
OF CODES MATRIX ENERGY PYRAMID
HYSTOGRAM OF CODES
ENERGY PYRAMID
BIORHYTHMS
CHART14
BRAIN
BIORHYTHMS
CHART53 143 1.70 90 the ideal improvement of increased CNS regulation and
7%
23%
0%
47
2.36
17%
33 65%
18%
FREQUENCY SPECTRUM
increased regulatory capacity.
61%
65%
98%
88%
aT = 0.10
aP = 0.01 aR = 1.00
aT = 0.12
D1 (Present time) -Is an indication of how well your patient’s brain is
AM
32%
68% D2 those
20%
regulating
brainD1waves
at this time.
D1
D2
N ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY
SPLINE-MAPS OF BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY
D2 (Capacity left) -This represents the regulation reserves.
.50
0.88
0.49
0.89
0.49
0.89
0.88
.evel
. . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. 63%
.. ... ...C1
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .....level
.. .. .. .. .. .... ......91%
.- .compensation
. . . . . . . . . . . .level
. . . . ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..19%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60%
ompensation
. . . . .... .. .. .. .. ..level
...19%
.. ...-..compensation
. .. .. ..C1
.. ..60%
.eserves
. . . . . . . . . ................ ......57%
.. .. ...C2
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ..reserves
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...90%
. .- .compensation
. . . . . . . . . . . reserves
. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .15%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54%
ompensation
. . . . . . . .. .. .. .reserves
...15%
....-. ..compensation
. .. . .C2
.. .54%
T1 Before T2 After
K1 Before K2 After
HYTHMS
CHART
BIORHYTHMS
CHART
BRAINB2
BIORHYTHMS
BRAIN
CHARTCHART BRAIN BIORHYTHMS CHART BRAIN BIORHYTHMS CHART
B2
B1 BIORHYTHMS
FREQUENCY SPECTRUM
FREQUENCY SPECTRUM
FREQUENCY SPECTRUM
.49
0.8861%
0.50
0.89
0.50
0.88
19%
62%
59%
HART
SPECTRUM
65%18%CHART
98%
D1
D2
88%
D1
D1
D2
AIN
D2
gulation
. . .ELECTRICAL
. . . . level
. . . . . .ACTIVITY
. . . .SPLINE-MAPS
. . . .61%
. . . . . . OF
. . .BRAIN
. . . . .ELECTRICAL
. . . . . . . . . .ACTIVITY
. .D1
. . . . . 98%
FREQUENCY SPECTRUM
0.91
0.22
AUTOCORR. PORTRAIT
18%
62%
59%
D1
D2
D1
D2
D2
gulation
. . . . . . SPLINE-MAPS
.ACTIVITY
reserves
. . . . . . .0.54
. . . . OF
.0.22
. 65%
.BRAIN
. . . . . .ELECTRICAL
. . . . . 0.56
. . . . . ACTIVITY
.0.21
. . . . . . . . . . . . .0.55
. 88%
TRICAL
0.20
RTRAIT
0.88
19%
0.54
SPLINE-MAPS OF BRAIN ELECTRICAL
SPLINE-MAPS
ACTIVITY
OF BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY
0.49
0.49
0.89
0.18 0.89
0.54
0.22 using0.56
0.21a similar
0.55 improvement of
0.5443% in
In figure
T1 T2
we see an
improvement
in the0.20
D10.88
measure
of 38%
E4I; while
K1 K2 are the result of a one hour INDIGO session. These measures were given immediately following the session
with no integration time. 0.54
0.23
0.52
0.23
0.56
0.55
The T1 T2 figure also shows a D2 improvement of 24% after a one hour E4I session. Figure K1 K2 shows an
0.50
0.50the C2
0.88 improvement
0.89
of 41% in
measure immediately
session.
The
0.22 0.88
0.22 0.91 0.54following
0.23 an INDIGO
0.52
0.23
0.56 D1 and D2 measures
0.55
. . 53 reflect
[ 60 - 90
]
the brain’s regulatory capacities and abilities to produce the required brainwaves necessary for effective brain
. . 211.7 [ 35 - 145 ]
executive thinking, to memory , to sleep, attention, movement and more.
. . 0.17 functions,
[ 0.25 - 0.6 from
]
. . . 36.9
[ 15 - 50 ]
egulation
... .. 94.5
. . . . .level
. [. .10
. .. .-. ..100
.. .. .. ..].. .19%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62%
egulation
. . . . .reserves
. [. 50
. . . -. 500
. .. .. .. .]. ..18%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59%
.. . .23.7
.. .. .. .. .61%
. . D1
. . . -. regulation
. . . . . . . . . level
. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. 98%
.. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ...68%
. . . D1
. . . -. regulation
. . . . . . . . .level
. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..19%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62%
rves
.. .. .. .. 65%
. . . D2
. . . -. regulation
. . . . . . . . .reserves
. . . . . . . .. .. .. ..88%
.. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ...20%
. . . D2
. . .-.regulation
. . . . . . . . reserves
. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..18%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59%
iNDIGO