ANTIOXIDATIVE VALUES AND CUSTOMER PREFERENCE OF SWEETPOTATO (Ipomoea batatas) FLOUR AS COMPARED TO WHEAT (Triticum aestivuni) FLOUR BY MOHAMAD RAZLAN ABD RAHMAN A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Medical Sciences (Biochemistry) Kulliyyah of Medicine International Islamic University Malaysia FEBRUARY 2009 ABSTRACT Sweet potato is one of the most widely consumed root crops in the tropics especially in Malaysia. This study aims at comparing the antioxidative values of wheat and sweet potato flours and to evaluate customers’ preference towards bakery products made from the flours. The study was divided into 3 phases which were phase 1 (Sampling and flour production), phase 2 (Extraction, determination of components and activity of antioxidants in sweet potato and wheat flours), and phase 3 (Food processing and evaluation). Phase 1 concluded that the recovery rate from fresh sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) roots to flour was about 20-30%. In phase 2, antioxidant activities of MeoH extracts of the flours were evaluated by two in vitro systems, the DPPH radical scavenging and β-Carotene bleaching assays. The extracts had different levels of antioxidant activity in the systems tested where it ranged from 0.09 to more than 10 mg/ml. The antioxidant activities (effective concentration, EC50 mg/ml) of the three varieties of sweet potatoes are in the order of VitAto steam (0.69 mg/ml) > Jalomas steam (0.81 mg/ml) > Telong steam (0.94 mg/ml) and with a p-value of 0.11 when compared to raw-treated sweet potatoes. Also, the phenolic contents ranged from 1.55 to 8.34 mg/g among the sweet potato extracts. Total phenolic concentration, expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g of methanolic extracts did not show correlation with the antioxidant activity (R2 = DPPH/Phenolics was 0.051). Nevertheless phase 3 showed participants’ preference for buns 1 and 2; and muffins 1 and 2 where (1 = 75% sweet potato flour) and (2 = 100% wheat flour). Results showed a p-value of 0.028 for muffins and 0.006 for buns, concluding that there was a significant difference between preference for buns 1 and 2; and between muffins 1 and 2. In short, our local sweet potato flours have potential as alternatives to wheat flour because of comparable antioxidative values and they can be a source of staple food besides rice in our country. ii ﺨﺺ اﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻠ ّ ﺗﻌﺘﺒﺮ اﻟﺒﻄﺎﻃﺎ اﻟﺤﻠﻮﻩ ) (Ipomoea batatasواﺣﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ اآﺜﺮ اﻟﻤﺤﺎﺻﻴﻞ اﻟﺰراﻋﻴﻪ اﻟﻨﺎﻣﻴﻪ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻤﻨﺎﻃﻖ اﻻﺳﺘﻮاﺋﻴﻪ وﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺰﻳﺎ .هﺪﻓﺖ هﺬﻩ اﻟﺪراﺳﻪ اﻟﻰ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ اﻟﺒﻄﺎﻃﺎ اﻟﺤﻠﻮﻩ آﻤﻀﺎدات ﻟﻼآﺴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻻﻇﺎﻓﻪ اﻟﻰ ﺗﻘﻴﻤﻬﺎ آﻤﺼﺪر ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﺎدر اﻟﻐﺬاء ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ اﻟﻤﺴﺘﻬﻠﻜﻴﻦ .ﻗﺴﻤﺖ هﺬﻩ اﻟﺪراﺳﻪ اﻟﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺮاﺣﻞ اﻻوﻟﻰ ﺟﻤﻊ اﻟﻌﻴﻨﺎت وﺗﺤﻀﻴﺮ اﻟﺨﺒﺰ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻢ اﺳﺘﺨﻼص -20 30%آﺨﻼﺻﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ اﻟﺒﻄﺎﻃﺎ اﻟﻄﺎزﺟﻪ .اﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﻪ اﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﻪ وﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻢ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ ﺧﻼﺻﺔ اﻟﻤﻴﺜﺎﻧﻮل آﻤﻀﺎدات ﻟﻼآﺴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪام DPPH radical scavengingو β-Carotene bleaching assaysﺣﻴﺚ اﻇﻬﺮت اﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻬﺎ اﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﺎ ) (p-value of 0.11ﺑﻤﻌﺪل 0.09اﻟﻰ 10ﻣﻠﻐﻢ/ﻣﻞ وآﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺴﺎوي 0.69ﻣﻠﻐﻢ ﻟﻨﻮع VitAto steamو 0.81ﻟﻨﻮع Jalomas steam و 0.94ﻟﻨﻮع Telong steamآﻤﺎ آﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻜﻮﻧﺎت اﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮل ﻓﻴﻬﺎ 1.55اﻟﻰ 8.32ﻣﻠﻐﻢ/غ اﻣﺎ ﺗﺮآﻴﺰ اﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮل اﻟﻜﻠﻲ ) (Total phenolic concentrationﻟﻢ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ اي ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻞ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﻣﻊ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻬﺎ آﻤﻀﺎدات ﻟﻼآﺴﺪﻩ .اﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﻪ اﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﻪ ﻓﺎﻇﻬﺮت اﻟﻨﺒﺘﻪ ﻗﻴﻤﻪ ﻏﺬاﺋﻴﻪ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻘﺎرﻧﻪ ﻣﻊbuns 1و 2وﻣﻊ 1 muffinsو ) 2ﺣﻴﺚ ان اﻟﺮﻗﻢ 1ﻳﺸﻴﺮ اﻟﻰ اﻟﺨﺒﺰ اﻟﻤﺤﺘﻮي ﻋﻠﻰ %75ﺑﻄﺎﻃﺎ واﻟﺮﻗﻢ 2اﻟﻰ اﻟﺨﺒﺰ اﻟﺨﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻦ اﻟﺒﻄﺎﻃﺎ( وآﺎﻧﺖ اﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ اﻻﺣﺼﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺗﺸﻴﺮ اﻟﻰ وﺟﻮد اﺧﺘﻼف ﻣﻌﻨﻮي ﺑﻴﻦ bunsو . muffinsﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎد ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ اﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺗﻌﺘﺒﺮ اﻟﺒﻄﺎﻃﺎ اﻟﺤﻠﻮﻩ ذات ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﻪ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﻪ آﻤﻀﺎدات ﻟﻼآﺴﺪﻩ وذات ﻗﻴﻤﻪ ﻏﺬاﺋﻴﻪ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﻪ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ اﺳﺘﺨﺪاﻣﻬﺎ آﻤﺼﺪر ﻟﻠﻐﺬاء اﻟﻰ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ اﻻرز. iii APPROVAL PAGE I certify that I have supervised and read this study and that in my opinion it conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Master of Medical Sciences (Biochemistry). ………………………… Mazidah Ahmad Mansur Supervisor I certify that I have read this study and that in my opinion it conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully adequate, in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Master of Medical Sciences (Biochemistry). ………………………… Nor Zamzila Abdullah Examiner This dissertation was submitted to the Department of Basic Medical Sciences and is accepted as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Medical Sciences (Biochemistry). ………………………… Pakeer Oothuman Syed Ahamed Head, Department of Basic Medical Sciences This dissertation was submitted to the Kulliyyah of Medicine and is acceptable as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Medical Sciences (Biochemistry). ………………………… Mohammed Fauzi Abdul Rani Dean, Kulliyyah of Medicine iv DECLARATION I hereby declare that this dissertation is the results of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. I also declare that it has not been previously or concurrently submitted as a whole for any other degrees at IIUM or other institutions. Mohamad Razlan Abd Rahman Signature……………………… Date…………………….. v A INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA DECLARATION OF COPYRIGHT AND AFFIRMATION OF FAIR USE OF UNPUBLISHED RESEARCH Copyright @ 2009 by Mohamad Razlan Abd Rahman. All rights reserved. ANTIOXIDATIVE VALUES AND CUSTOMER PREFERENCE OF SWEETPOTATO (Ipomoea batatas) FLOUR AS COMPARED TO WHEAT (Triticum aestivuni) FLOUR No part of this unpublished research may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the copyright holder except as provided below: 1. Any material contained in or derived from this unpublished research may only be used by others in their writing with due acknowledgement. 2. IIUM or its library will have the right to make and transmit copies (print or electronic) for institutional and academic purposes. 3. The IIUM library will have the right to make, store in a retrieval system and supply copies of this unpublished research if requested by other universities and research libraries. Affirmed by Mohamad Razlan Abd Rahman. ………………………………… Signature vi …………………… Date Foremost is for ALLAH for Him to accept this and succeeding works as my Ibadah, and for the betterment of quality of life for man and animals. vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, tremendous gratitude is for ALLAH alone Who gave me opportunity to go through this Masters programme until the end. Then my gratitude also goes to my caring and concerned supervisor, Prof. Dr. Mazidah Ahmad Mansur, who was always ready to help me for my success in the Masters programme. My parents Zulaikha Hj. Ismail and Abd Rahman Hj. Md. Khalid who always prayed for my success in this life and the thereafter. Bro Erman, Najib, Dr. Qamar Uddin, Adisham, sis Sri, and all of the Kulliyyah of Pharmacy’s MLTs and lecturers; Sis Rozila, Nadia, and all of the Kulliyyah of Allied Health Science’s MLTs and lecturers; Bro Muzammil from Kulliyyah of Science, my postgraduate colleagues, Bro Mustafa from Sudan, all of the lecturers from Kulliyyah of Medicine, and Kulliyyah of Science, and those who are not listed here whom have helped me throughout my learning process during the Masters programme. Lastly for my new inspiration that came into my life during the duration of the programme which is my beloved companion, sis Azmahani Hj. Zainudin, my wife. viii TABLES OF CONTENTS Abstract ...................................................................................................................... ii Abstract in Arabic ...................................................................................................... iii Approval Page ............................................................................................................ iv Declaration Page ........................................................................................................ v Copyright Page........................................................................................................... vi Dedication .................................................................................................................. vii Acknowledgments...................................................................................................... viii List of Tables ............................................................................................................. xii List of Figures ............................................................................................................ xiii List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................. xvi CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION .................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Import substitution / export potential ............................................. 1 1.1.2 Production of sweet potatoes ......................................................... 2 1.1.2.1 Global .................................................................................. 2 1.1.2.2 In Malaysia .......................................................................... 3 1.1.3 The importance of sweet potato today ........................................... 3 1.1.3.1 As an alternative staple food ............................................... 3 1.1.3.2 Low glycemic index (GI) control ........................................ 3 1.1.3.3 As an antioxidant ................................................................. 4 1.1.4 Production of sweet potato flour .................................................... 5 1.2 Significance of study ................................................................................ 6 1.3 Research questions ................................................................................... 6 1.4 Research hypotheses ................................................................................. 6 1.5 Objectives ................................................................................................. 7 1.5.1 Main objectives .............................................................................. 7 1.5.2 Specific objectives ......................................................................... 7 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................................... 8 2.1 Free radicals .............................................................................................. 8 2.1.1 Sources and reactions of reactive oxigen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) .................................................... 9 2.1.2 Effects of free radicals on cells ...................................................... 10 2.1.2.1 Aging Biology ...................................................................... 10 2.1.2.2 Oxidative nuclear and mitochondrial DNA damage ........... 10 2.1.3 Some diseases related to free radicals ............................................ 11 2.1.3.1 Atherosclerosis ............................................................................ 11 2.1.3.2 Cancer ................................................................................. 12 2.1.3.3 Inflammation........................................................................ 13 2.1.3.4 Autoimmune diseases........................................................... 13 ix 2.1.3.5 Diabetes ............................................................................... 14 2.1.3.6 Rhuematoid arthritis ............................................................ 15 2.1.4 Importance of free radicals ............................................................ 15 2.2 Oxidative stress .................................................................................................. 16 2.2.1 Oxidative stress and redox environment of a cell ................................... 16 2.2.2 Metal-induced oxidative stress....................................................... 17 2.3 Oxidative damage to biomolecules........................................................... 17 2.3.1 Lipid peroxidation .......................................................................... 17 2.3.2 Protein oxidation ............................................................................ 18 2.4 Phytochemicals and antioxidants.............................................................. 20 2.4.1 Antioxidant phytochemicals and human health ............................. 21 2.4.2 Enzymatic antioxidants .................................................................. 23 2.4.2.1 Superoxide dismutase (SOD) ............................................... 23 2.4.2.2 Glutathione peroxidase ....................................................... 23 2.4.2.3 Glutathione reductase (GR) ................................................ 24 2.4.2.4 Catalase (CAT) .................................................................... 24 2.4.3 Non-enzymatic antioxidants .......................................................... 25 2.4.3.1 Vitamin C ............................................................................. 25 2.4.3.2 Vitamin E ............................................................................. 26 2.4.3.3 Selenium .............................................................................. 27 2.4.3.4 Flavonoids ........................................................................... 28 2.4.3.5 Plant antioxidant phytochemicals ....................................... 31 2.4.3.5.1 Carotenoids (β-Carotene) ......................................... 31 2.4.3.5.2 Polyphenolic compounds .......................................... 33 2.4.4 Evaluation of antioxidant activity .................................................. 34 2.5 Antioxidant defense .................................................................................. 34 2.5.1 Antioxidant mechanisms of action ................................................. 35 2.6 Sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) and antioxidants ................................ 36 2.6.1 Sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) storage roots as a source of antioxidant activity ......................................................................... 36 2.7 Wheat (Triticum aestivuni) and antioxidants............................................ 37 2.7.1 Antioxidant content in wheat (Triticum aestivuni) flour ............... 37 2.8 Health benefits of phytochemicals in whole foods—food synergy .......... 38 2.9 Effect of food processing on antioxidants ................................................ 39 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY.............................................................. 42 3.1 Phase 1 - Sampling and flour production ................................................. 43 3.1.1 Research samples ........................................................................... 43 3.1.2 Materials and Methods for Sweet potato Flour Production ........... 44 3.2 Phase 2 - Extraction, determination of components and activity of antioxidants in sweet potato and wheat flours .......................................... 47 3.2.1 Sweet potato and wheat flour extraction ........................................ 47 3.2.2 Materials and methods for sweet potato and wheat flour extraction ....................................................................................... 47 3.2.3 Determination of activity of antioxidants in sweet potato and wheat flours ................................................................................... 49 3.2.4 Materials and methods for the determination of activity of antioxidants in sweet potato and wheat flours ............................... 49 x 3.2.5 Determination of components of antioxidants in sweet potato and wheat flours ................................................................................... 52 3.2.6 Materials and methods for the determination of components of antioxidants in sweet potato and wheat flours ............................... 52 3.2.7 Statistical analysis .......................................................................... 54 3.3 Phase 3 - Food processing and evaluation ................................................ 55 3.3.1 Food product evaluation................................................................. 56 3.3.2 Statistical analysis .......................................................................... 56 CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS ............................................................................... 57 4.1 Percentage of flour recovery from sweet potato storage roots ................. 57 4.2 Antioxidant capacity ................................................................................. 57 4.3 Comparison of antioxidant activity between wheat (Triticum aestivuni) flour varieties ............................................................................................ 58 4.4 Comparison of antioxidant activity between treatments for sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) flour variaties ............................................................. 59 4.5 Total phenolic compounds........................................................................ 66 4.6 Total flavonoids ........................................................................................ 67 4.7 Correlation between total phenolic compounds and scavenging capacity70 4.8 Food product evaluation ........................................................................... 71 CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION ......................................................................... 74 5.1 Research limitations ................................................................................. 82 CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSION ...................................................................... 83 BIBLIOGRAPHY: .................................................................................................. 84 APPENDIX I: APPENDIX II: APPENDIX III: APPENDIX IV: APPENDIX V: .................................................................................................. 99 .................................................................................................. 100 .................................................................................................. 101 .................................................................................................. 102 .................................................................................................. 103 xi LIST OF TABLES Table No. Page No. 1.1 Glycemic index of certain food 4 4.1 Antioxidant activity between wheat samples 58 4.2 EC50 values (mg/ml) of sweet potato and wheat flour extracts in the antioxidant activity evaluation assays 64 4.3 Antioxidant activity between wheat and sweet potatotreated samples 65 4.4 Contents of total phenols (mg GAE/g) and flavonoids (mg QE/g) in sweet potato and wheat flour extracts 68 4.5 Phenolic contents in sweet potato and wheat extracts 69 4.6 Flavonoid contents in sweet potato and wheat extracts 69 4.7 Preference for bakery products made from sweet potato and wheat flours 73 Appendix VI Some nutritional contents of sweet potato and wheat flours 87 Appendix V Product score sheet 88 xii LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Page No. 2.1 Reaction of guanine with hydroxyl radical 10 2.2 Three stages model of carcinogenesis and the level of carcinogenic effect vs. level of free radicals at various stages of carcinogenic process 12 2.3 Classification of Phytochemicals 22 2.4 The accepted structural configuration of ascorbic acid (vitamin C), an α-ketolactone with the formula C6H8O6, with a molecular weight of 176.13, and containing an acidionizing group in water with pKA 4.19 25 2.5 Chemical structure of tocopherols and tocotrienol (α-tocopherol without a phytyl chain) 26 2.6 Generic structure of flavonoids 28 2.7 Structure of a flavonoid subclass, quercetin 28 2.8 Hypothesis of the links between the working mechanisms of flavonoids and their effects on disease. NO, nitric oxide 29 2.9 Reactive oxygen species that can be scavenged or whose formation can be inhibited by flavonoids 30 2.10 Structure of all-trans-β-carotene 31 2.11 Important Physical and Chemical Properties of Carotenoids 32 xiii Page No. Figure No. 2.12 Example of a standard phenolic compound 33 2.13 Cellular generation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defence system in an organ (lung). 35 2.14 Interactions between components in whole grains and the microflora that have important implications in health and disease 38 2.15 Possible scheme for Carotenoid degradation 40 3.1 Flow chart of research methodology 42 3.2 Researcher at MARDI Telong station in Kelantan 43 3.3 Steamed and dried VitAto sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) 45 3.4 Pictogram of end products of flour production that were used in the research 46 3.5 Freeze drying process of sweet potato extracts 48 3.6 Pictogram of product distribution to participants 55 4.1 Scavenging effect of 80% methanolic extracts of wheat flours on DPPH radicals 58 4.2a Scavenging effect of 80% methanolic extracts of raw and steamed sweet potato (Telong) on DPPH radicals. 59 4.2b Antioxidant activity of sweet potato (Telong) with different treatments using a β-carotene-linoleate model system 59 xiv Page No. Figure No. 4.3a Scavenging effect of 80% methanolic extracts of raw and steamed sweet potato (Jalomas) on DPPH radicals. 61 4.3b Antioxidant activity of sweet potato (Jalomas) with different treatments using a β-carotene-linoleate model 61 system 4.4a Scavenging effect of 80% methanolic extracts of raw and steamed sweet potato (VitAto) on DPPH radicals. 63 4.4b Antioxidant activity of sweet potato (VitAto) with different treatments using a β-carotene-linoleate model system 63 4.5 Standard curve for phenolics using Gallic acid 66 4.6 Standard curve for flavonoids using Quercetin 67 4.7 Correlation between DPPH scavenging capacity % and total phenolics mg GAE/g in methanol extracts of sweet potato and wheat samples 70 4.8a Customers’ preference for Muffin 71 4.8b Customers’ preference for Buns 71 Appendix I Sweet potato flour (75%) : wheat flour (25%), based buns 84 Appendix II Wheat flour (100%) based buns 85 Appendix III Government studies sweet potato as a substitute for rice (in Malay) 86 xv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AlCl3.6H2O CVD DNA DPPH et al. etc e.g. g Ho H2 O2 H2 O i.e. kg MARDI mbar MeoH mg min ml mm mV NADH NADP+ nm n.d. OH. O2 O2 . pKA ppm ROI ROO. R2 µg µm Aluminium chloride hexahydrate Cardiovascular Disease Dinucleotide Acid 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radicals (et alia): and others (et cetera): and so forth For example gram Null Hypothesis Hydrogen peroxide Water Included example kilogram Malaysian Agricultural Research Development and Innovation millibar Methanol milligram minute milliliter millimeter millivolt Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (reduced form) Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate nanometer no date Hydroxyl radical Oxygen molecule Superoxide anion negative logarithm of acid dissociation constant part per million Reactive oxygen intermediates Peroxide radical Symbol for correlation in graph microgram micrometer xvi CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Containing about 50 genera and 1000 species, the Convolvulaceae family is a cosmopolitan in distribution but most diverse in the tropics. Most members are herbaceous vines annual or perennial, colonizing naturally open artificially distured habitats, and often spreading vegetatively by rooting at nodes. Several genera include garden ornamentals. Only Ipomoea has been domesticated for food crops. Ipomoea is a cosmopolitan genus of about 400 species whereby Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato) has far wider importance (Jonathan D. Sauer, 1993). The sweet potato that we know today comes from the Kingdom of Plantae, Division of Magnoliophyta, Class of Magnoliopsida, Order of Solanales, Family of Convolvulaceae, Genus of Ipomoea, and Species of Batatas. Therefore the binomial name is Ipomoea batatas. The root and tuber crops are grown widely throughout the world in hot and humid regions. The root and tuber crops contain 70-80% water, 16-24% starch and trace quantities (<4%) of proteins and lipids (Hoover, 2001). The sizes and shapes varies and are 2-42 round cm (Seog, et al., 1987), oval or polygonal (Tian, et al., 1991). 1.1.1 Import substitution / export potential A tropical climate such as that of Malaysia is not favourable or unsuitable to planting crops such as wheat, corn and Irish potato. Malaysia spends on imports of wheat 1 products worth RM800 million a year (Anon., 2002), while the total import of Irish potato is more than RM167 million. Malaysia will be able to reduce foreign exchange if at least parts of these imports are met by local production of sweet potato for flour. Most of the snacks in the market today are made from wheat flour, corn and Irish potato which are imported ingredients. Extruded snacks can be produced from sweet potato flour mixed with cassava flour or rice flour at different proportions. Food products made from sweet potato flour substituting the use of wheat flour have a niche market among sufferers of coeliac disease (an allergy to wheat gluten). This market which exists in Europe and North America is currently largely untapped, especially for products traditionally made from wheat, i.e. bakery goods. These include western-style cakes, bread, buns, muffins and biscuits. Thus, a lot of people can benefit from the consumption of sweet potato especially in Malaysia. These will benefit people involved in the industry such as patients, farmers, and food makers (bakery products). 1.1.2 Production of sweet potatoes 1.1.2.1 Global The sweet potato crop, which has its origin in the tropical Americas, has spread to most of the world’s tropical, sub-tropical, and warmer temperate regions. According to the FAO, sweet potatoes are grown in 111 countries, of which 101 are classified as ‘developing nations. Among the world’s root crops the sweet potato ranks second only to the potato in economic importance (Woolfe, 1992). Field studies in Asia, Africa, and Latin America show a diversity of sweet potato production practices and final uses in different kinds of food systems. For example on the island of Java, sweet potato is intensively cultivated as a cash crop by 2 farmers who are linked to a well-organized marketing chain supplying the major cities for fresh consumption or food processing into snacks. In the neighbouring island of Sumatra, sweet potato is grown as an off-season staple food between rice crops (Watson, 1988; 1989). 1.1.2.2 In Malaysia Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) is a minor root crop in Malaysia, and one of the popular cash crops grown by small holder farmers for the fresh market. However the demand for sweet potato for table consumption is somewhat small, and can be one of the reasons why the cultivated area for this crop has remained around 2,000 hectare a year in Peninsular Malaysia (Anon., 1990-2000). 1.1.3 The importance of sweet potato today 1.1.3.1 As an alternative staple food Sweet potato tolerance against extreme weather conditions such as typhoon, drought, and against pests, and diseases as well as their importance as a source of starch and vitamins, has led Japan establishing a strong sweet potato breeding program (Kukimura, et al., 1990). The germplasm collections include Japanese local cultivars; breeding lines from China, Fiji, Indonesia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Solomon Islands, and the U.S.; and wild sweet potatoes from Latin America (Rodriguez-Amaya, 1997). 1.1.3.2 Low Glycemic Index (GI) control The glycemic Index (GI) is the rate of food converting to glucose in the blood circulation. The GI of sweet potato is (54), which is low when compared to white bread 3 (96) or white rice (70). This means sweet potato is a better alternative for glucose control consumed by diabetic patients (MARDI, 2007). Table 1.1 Glycemic index of certain food Types of food Glycemic Index ____________________________ Glucose 100 White bread 96 Cornflakes 84 Rice Krispies 82 French fries 75 Honey 73 Carrot 71 White rice 70 Soft drinks 70 Roasted peanuts 68 Ice-cream 61 Hamburger 61 Sweet potato 54 ___________________________ (MARDI, 2007) 1.1.3.3 As an antioxidant Important sources of antioxidants in the Hawaiian diet include sweet potato, taro, bok choy, konbu, nori, and wakame for β-carotene; breadfruit, sweet potato, turnip, guava, lychee, mango, and pineapple for vitamin C; and macadamia nuts, sweet potato, and mango for vitamin E (Laurin, et al., 2004). 4 1.1.4 Production of sweet potato flour A viable agri-business was introduced, covering field production of sweet potato varieties, Telong and Jalomas, and then processing it into flour, and subsequently into premix flours for traditional cakes, extruded products (snacks and breakfast food) and a range of bakery products. Most local varieties of sweet potato which are high-yielding are very low in root dry matter or starch content, and therefore unsuitable for sweet potato flour products. It was found that varieties like Telong and Jalomas, have moderately high root yields of 20-25 t/ha (metric ton per hectare) and have significant higher root dry matter contents, and therefore higher flour recovery rate. Jalomas with its orangey coloured flesh has also a moderately high carotenoid content. Carotenoids are favoured for their antioxidant properties which have health benefits. These two varieties, the first in Malaysia, are adapted to be cultivated on a range of soils, particularly sandy soils such as bris and sand-tailings. Flour made from Telong and Jalomas varieties can be further processed into a number of value-added food products. Prior to the introduction of Telong and Jalomas varieties, there were no sweet potato processing varieties dedicated for flour production. Most of the existing popular varieties have very low dry matter or starch content, which means very low conversion rate to flour unlike that of Telong and Jalomas varieites. Most extruded products for snacks and breakfast food, as well as bakery products are dependent on imported raw materials such as wheat, corn or potato. Sweet potato flour from Telong and Jalomas offers an alternative local raw material for processing such products. 5 1.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY It is expected that the nutritional contents of the varieties of sweet potatoes established by MARDI (Lian, et al., 2007) and in other studies conducted by other groups (Huang, et al., 2006; Salma & Zaidah, 2006) could be verified and supported. These discoveries will promote growth of sweet potato especially those with higher nutritional contents, for commercial purposes as well as means to prevent certain diseases related to free radical effects. These certainly will contribute to new venture by food industries to provide more choices to customers and create more employments. Furthermore, this can increase the income of local farmers. This will reduce foreign exchange due to import of wheat flour and contribute to positive economic impact to the country. 1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1) Is sweet potato flour better compared to wheat flour in term of the antioxidative values? 2) Do consumers prefer sweet potato flour bakery products over wheat flour bakery products? 1.4 RESEARCH HYPOTHESES 1) The antioxidative values in sweet potato flours are significantly higher than in wheat flours. 2) Customers prefer sweet potato flour bakery products than wheat flour product. 6 1.5 OBJECTIVES 1.5.1 Main Objectives 1) To determine the antioxidative values of sweet potato and wheat flours. 2) To determine customers’ preferences in choosing a bakery product made of sweet potato or wheat flour. 1.5.2 Specific Objectives 1) To compare the antioxidative values between raw and steam treated sweet potato flours. 2) To compare the antioxidative values among the various types of sweet potato and wheat flours. 3) To compare customers preferences between sweet potato and wheat bakery products. 7 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW Frequent consumption of fruits and vegetables is associated with a lowered risk of cancer, heart disease, hypertension and stroke. This has been attributed to the presence of various forms of phytochemicals and antioxidants present in the foods, e.g. carotenoids and polyphenol compounds including flavonoids and anthocyanins (Lako, et al., 2007). 2.1 FREE RADICALS Free radicals can be defined as molecules or molecular fragments containing one or more unpaired electrons. The presence of unpaired electrons usually confers a considerable degree of reactivity upon a free radical. Those radicals derived from oxygen represent the most important class of such species generated in living systems (Valko, et al., 2004). Harmful free radical and reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been found to play an important role in the major chronic health problems (German & Dillard, 1998; Keher, 1993). Radicals and ROS such as the superoxide anion (O2•−), hydroxyl radical (OH•) and peroxy radical (ROO•) have been implicated as mediators of degenerative inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases (Nice, 1997; Heliovaara, et al., 1994), as well as diabetes, vascular disease (Tsao & Deng, 2004), and cancer (Ames, et al., 1993; Ferguson, 1994). 8
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz