147. 31. Haurowitz, Felix, The Chemistry and Function of Proteins

147.
31. Haurowitz, Felix, The Chemistry and Function of Proteins, Academic
Press, New York, (1963).
32.
Setlow, Richard B. and Ernest C. Pollard, Molecular Biophysics,
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Mass. (1962).
,
DR. GOLL: Thank you, Harry, f o r t h e very c l e a r p i c t u r e
you havo given us concerning some of t h e rather d i f f i c u l t techniques which axe available t o study fibrous proteins. E a r l i e r
t h i s morning you heard a discussion of t h e structure of muscle.
I t h i n k you w i l l f i n d t h a t many of t h e s t r u c t u r a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s
o r s t r u c t u r a l features found in a muscle c e l l axe those which
we would o r d i n a r i l y expect i n a normal c e l l . A muscle c e l l has
a c e l l membrane, cytoplasm, sarcoplasmic reticulum o r endoplasmic
reticulum, mitochondria, nuclei -- many of t h e same s t r u c t u r a l
features which you would expect i n an ordinary c e l l . The
presence of t h e myofibril makes muscle and muscle c e l l s a highly
specialized c e l l , and Bob Cassens outlined f o r us some of t h e
unique features of muscle c e l l s . Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi then went
i n t o t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e proteins, especially t h e prot e i n s which make up t h e myofibrils. W
e learned some of t h e
unique s t r u c t u r d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s proceeding t o t h e molecular
l e v e l i n our discussion, p a r t i c u l a r l y i n t h e case of myosin,
about which t h e r e appears t o be more information than about
t h e other two major proteins found i n t h e rqyofibril. Then our
last speaker t h i s morning, Dr. Snyder, outlined f o r us i n
general terms t h e methods which are available t o separate and
s t u d y , t h e fibrous proteins which make up the bulk of muscle.
I think we're j u s t about r i g h t on time, so we should
have approximately f i f t e e n t o twenty minutes l e f t f o r discussion.
Are t h e r e any questions from t h e f l o o r ? I might add t h a t you
please state your name and your i n s t i t u t i o n before asking a
question f o r t h e benefit of our recorder.
DR. PAUL: I am Pauline Paul f r o m t h e University of
California. I am very much i n t e r e s t e d i n t h e problem of prot e i n separations and i n looking through t h e l i t e r a t u r e you f i n d
t h e sort of thing t h a t Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi mentioned concerning
a t e n p e r cent stroma content of rabbit muscle. Then you look
at t h e kind of thing that has been done with the beef round
muscles where you f i n d somewhere i n t h e neighborhood of maybe
two t o t h r e e p e r cent connective tissue. I am curious about
what else comes i n t o t h i s stroma t o bring it up. Coes anyone
have any information on t h i s ? We're t r y i n g t o match up some
of these basic d a t a and get some idea of how much we should
f i n d i n these d i f f e r e n t factions, you see, before w e s t a r t .
DR. GOLL: This i s an i n t e r e s t i n g topic. Perhaps
Dr. Szent-Gyorgyf would care t o comment on it. I understand
t h e nature of t h e proteins i n t h e Z-band i s not altogether
known and t h i s m a y contribute i n p a r t t o t h e disparity.
148.
DR. SZERC-GYORGYI: I am afraid it will depend on what type
of muscle you are using. You c e r t a i n l y w i l l have p r o t e i n i n t h e
Z-band. People suspect t h a t p a r t of it may be due t o tropomyosin,
but you may have various amounts of connective t i s s u e . I don't
t h i n k one can give a straightforward answer about what you will
f i n d o r what you should expect.
DR. PAUL: W e l l , t h e t h i n g I ' m puzzled about i s t h a t t h e
rabbit source has about t e n p e r cent stroma p r o t e i n on t h i s kind
o f a basis. The beef round muscles which would be expected t o have
a l o t more connective t i s s u e seem t o have a l o t less.
they are using d i f f e r e n t methods of separation.
Of course
DR. SZENT-GYORGYI: It would depend e n t i r e l y on what
method of extraction you use. You m a y be employing methods f o r
e x t r a c t i n g a c t i n o r actomyosin o r tropomyosin. But i f you use
20$ urea t h e p e r cent of soluble p r o t e i n will c e r t a i n l y be much
l a r g e r than i f you use simply high ionic strength KCI. If you
use potassium iodide of some s o r t you can make an e x t r a c t i o n of
95$ t o 96%. So it e n t i r e l y depends on how you define your ext r a c t i o n , how you i d e n t i f y your p r o t e i n s and then you have t o
f i n d out where t h e s e p r o t e i n s come from.
DR. PAUL: Has t h e r e been any work t o t r y and i d e n t i f y
what they c a l l these stroma p r o t e i n s ?
DR. SZENT-GYORGYI: Not at all. Part of t h e stroma
p r o t e i n f r a c t i o n m a y be tropoqyosin, which was c a l l e d a stroma
p r o t e i n about f i f t e e n years ago. Now it i s c a l l e d a f i b r i l l a r
p r o t e i n o r a p r o t e i n of t h e myofibril. It i s not associated
with t h e sarcolemma at least, and now we s t a r t t o suspect it
m a y be a c t u a l l y part of the Z-band but it i s a long process,
you see. I t h i n k you c a l l it a stroma p r o t e i n i f you don't
know anything about it.
(Laughter)
DR. T € W " :
I am from Oscar Mayer & Company. I
would l i k e t o d i r e c t a question t o D r . Szent-Gyorgyi. A t r i g o r
mortis how constant do you consider t h e stoichiometric combinat i o n of t h e m l e c u l a r r a t i o s of a c t i n and myosin, and can t h i s
be influenced by t h e physiological condition of t h e muscle
t i s s u e at t h a t t i m ?
DR. SZENT-GYORGYI: Well, t h e amount of a c t i n and myosin
i n t h e muscle i s not a question. I t h i n k t h e question i s what
are t h e number of cross linkages present during r i g o r mortis, and
I have t o speculate here. It has been concluded by others, t h a t
t h e development of r i g i d i t y , or rigor, coincides with t h e d i s appearance of ATP. It develops only when t h e A!TP l e v e l decreases.
I cannot answer your question d i r e c t l y , however, I would l i k e
t o know t h e answer.
DR. TAKI: T a k i , from t h e University of Florida. I am
a l i t t l e b i t confused about t h e method of e x t r a c t i o n for t h e
149.
d i f f e r e n t muscle proteins. Different people seem t o use d i f f e r ent procedures f o r extraction of t h e d i f f e r e n t protein coqonents,
such as myofibrillar proteins. What i s t h e difference i n t h e
extraction, whether we use, s a y pH 6 , o r an ionic strength of
0 . 1 o r 0.51 Are we extracting t h e same protein or not? Also,
concerning sarcoplasmic protein extraction, should we use water
o r buffer f o r t h e extraction of these proteins? What i s our
reference? What i s the standard procedure, o r i s n ' t there any?
DR. SNYIER: I think you h i t on it. The trouble i s we
don't have any reference, and t h e r e i s no standard procedure.
You have t o consider t h e f a c t t h a t t h e r e are many, many proteins
involved. I don't t h i n k it i s surprising t h a t each of these
proteins would require j u s t a l i t t l e b i t of change i n ionic s t r u c t u r e o r pH o r temperature o r some of t h e other conditions t o get
them out exclusively i n r e l a t i o n t o all of t h e other proteins t h a t
are i n muscle. I don't think t h i s i s anything t o worry about.
It i s t o be expected. But of course t h e problem i s t o f i n d t h e
r i g h t condition f o r t h e protein you want, and t h i s i s s t r i c t l y
quesswork as f a r as I know.
DR. TAKI: Ik we g e t a l l t h e protein out of t h e muscle,
a l l of t h e myofibrillar protein out, f o r instance, using a c e r t a i n
volunve at a c e r t a i n strength o r not? Using t h e micro-kjildahl
determination we s a y t h a t 16% of muscle i s protein. Is t h i s
determination true? CO we get all t h i s protein out of t h e muscle?
DR. SNYDER:
DR. GOLL:
Maybe D r . Go11 could answer t h a t .
I didn't hear t h e question.
DR. SNYDER: I j u s t don't know. I c a n ' t say whether
you can get a l l of t h e rnyofibrillar proteins out of muscles. It
depends on how you grind t h e thing up t o start with, and d i f f e r ent workers are using d i f f e r e n t mthods, yet they all a r r i v e at
almost t h e same answer.
DR. GOLL: They have used numerous d i f f e r e n t solutions.
I believe that complete extraction of myofibrillar protein has
been demnstrated by using strong K I extracting solutions. This
i s your best bet, i f you want quantitative extraction of t h e
myofibrillar proteins.
DR. TAKT: How i s one sure t h a t he g e t s a l l of the
protein out of t h e muscle?
DR. SNYDER: I don't t h i n k you would be sure, not at
t h e state of t h e knowledge we have r i g h t now.
are sure.
DR. SZENT-GYORGYI:
DR. GOLL:
You measure it. That i s how you
You measure what i s l e f t ?
150.
DR. SZENT-GYORGYI: No, you measure the ATPase a c t i v i t y
of t h e e n t i r e muscle and then t h e A!TPase a c t i v i t y of t h e extracted
protein. If these are not t h e same, then you have not extracted
all of the myofibrillar protein f o r almost a l l of t h e ATPase
a c t i v i t y i s i n t h e myofibrillar protein f r a c t i o n . If you have not
extracted a l l of t h e protein, then you check your e x t r a c t procedure. You know t h a t extract procedure does not destroy ATPase
a c t i v i t y . By t h i s procedure you can measure, somewhat, how comp l e t e your extraction has been. With o t h e r proteins, i t ' s a b i t
tougher, but it can be done. If you do t h i s measurement, how
much t h e r e was and how much is remaining, then you know. But f o r
extracting t h e other myofibrillar proteins you need d i f f e r e n t
procedures.
DR. TAKI: W e l l , i n your c l a s s i f i c a t i o n of muscle prot e i n s , there i s a general statement t h a t you can extract a l l of
these proteins by using a buffer of high ionic strength, about
0.5 o r so. If one used t h i s strength, should one expect t o get
a l l these proteins?
DR. SZENT-GYORGYI: If you cut t h e muscle up before
extraction. If you don't cut it up, you don't expect anything,
o r very little-sayt ten per cent of what i s there. By varying
t h e degree t o which t h e muscle i s minced before extraction, you
may change t h e amount of p r o t e i n extracted considerably. But
whether completely extracted o r not, t h a t depends upon t h e muscles
used, how you do your experiments, how long you extract and so on.
But you can determine what i s present i n t h i s type of muscle and
what i s l e f t after extraction. If you don't determine t h i s ,
nobody guarantees you t h a t you get 100 per cent extraction either.
DR. GOLL: J u s t a couple mre questions.
DR. WANDERSTOCK: Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi, I wonder i f you
would elaborate on t h e most current evidence describing t h e
mechanics of r i g o r .
DR. SZENT-GYORGYI: As f a r as r i g o r mortis i s concerned,
I t h i n k t h e best study i s s t i l l S c h i l l e r ' s , where they followed
t h e appearance of r i g o r and measured muscle metabolism during
t h e development of r i g o r o r r i g i d i t y of t h e muscle. They found
t h a t it was correlated only with t h e disappearance of ATP, and
I think I am correct i n saying t h a t t h e simplest p i c t u r e i s t h a t
r i g o r i s due t o formation of actomyosin, because of t h e f a c t
t h a t AC
!P disappears. ATP present i n the r e s t i n g s t a t e of muscle
i s necessary t o keep t h e l i n k s between a c t i n and myosin separated,
and you have got t o have enough ATP, of course, t o make it
contract. Muscle cannot be stretched i n r i g o r . The muscle w i l l
r a t h e r break than s t r e t c h . What happens later i s d i f f i c u l t t o
s a y . It i s probably due t o some proteolytic changes.
DR. MULLINS: Mullins, from Louisiana. I would l i k e
t o d i r e c t a question t o Dr. Snyder. I s it possible t o i s o l a t e
r e t i c u l i n from collagen?
151.
DR. SNYDER: I am going t o pass on that one. The expert
i s up on t h e podium as f a r as collagen i s concerned. I n my own
estimation, r e t i c u l i n hasn't been well characterized. I don t
have information on it myself.
DR. GOLL: I would s a y it would be extremely d i f f i c u l t .
Perhaps you could make d i f f e r e n t use of t h e thermostability of
protein.
I t h i n k at t h i s point t h a t I w i l l t u r n t h e program
back t o D r . Henrickson.
DR. HENRICKSON: It appears t h a t we have only spectators i n t h e
o t h e r room. The reciprocators are a l l i n t h i s room. I don't know where
Chairman Briskey i s . Are there any announcements, Quinn?
DR. KOLB: We are very pleased t o have t h e Usinger Sausage people
serve as hosts t o t h e c h a r t e r members of t h e American Meat Science Associat i o n t h i s noon at 12:OO o'clock over at L o w e l l H a l l .
DR. HENRICKSON:
We are adjourned u n t i l 10:15.
(Recess)
DR. HENRICKSON: Gentlemen, Prof. Quinn Kolb has an announcement
before we proceed w i t h t h e program. Quinn?
PROF, KOLB: Thank you, Bob. We have one thing t h a t I hope we
can g e t across t o you, i f we can t a l k t o t h e coffee drinkers and o t h e r s t o o .
When we assigned you parking places w e hoped you would continue t o use those
parking places t h a t were assigned t o you. If your c a r i s i n another spot
you m a y w e l l be i n a place where t h e owner of t h a t parking lot may have
you removed at your expense. So t h i s c r e a t e s a l i t t l e problem t h a t we
t h i n k we can a l l e v i a t e by working with you, and so we won't pick out i n dividuals but i f your c a r i s not i n t h e place o r i g i n a l l y assigned t o you,
would you t r y by noon o r s h o r t l y after t o get it back i n t h a t o r i g i n a l
spot. W e have a couple of f r a t e r n i t i e s who feel t h a t using t h e i r spot perhaps j u s t i s n ' t exactly Hoyle. So i f you folks who perhaps have changed
your parking place could get back i n your o r i g i n a l spot, it would help t h e
problems of our parking committee a g r e a t deal and then we perhaps wouldn't
have t h e problem of t r y i n g t o l o c a t e your c a r i n one of t h e p o l i c e l o t s
here i n t h e c i t y . So we want you t o enjoy your s t a y here. The o t h e r
announcement we want t o make again, i n case you missed it, was t h a t all of
you people and your guests t h a t you rnay have here are i n v i t e d t o t h e noon
luncheon and I pointed t h i s out t o you before t h a t t h e Usinger people are
pleased t o serve as h o s t s t o t h e chaster members and t h e i r guests of t h e
American Meat Science Association. So we w i l l look f o r you at 12:OO
o'clock over at L o w e l l H a l l and we wish you would get t h i s message t o a l l
of your guests and f r i e n d s here. The wives are not i n v i t e d t o t h e luncheon
t h i s noon.
152.
One o t h e r announcement, tonight we are serving w e l l over 300 at
t h e banquet at t h e Memorial Union and we would urge you t o go over as soon
as you can after t h e session i s f i n i s h e d t h i s afternoon. We are going t o
t r y and serve at 6:OO o'clock, on t i m e , and our f o l k s at t h e Union are
quite punctual. We w i l l need your cooperation t o g e t i n t h e building up t h e
stairs and i n t o t h e main h a l l at 6:OO o'clock. Very f i n e . Enjoy yourself
t h i s afternoon and t h i s evening.
DR. €ENRICKSON: Thank you, Quinn. Proceeding with our program,
you note t h a t t h e o t h e r selected t o p i c w a s physiological phases of t h e basic
research on muscle t i s s u e . To head t h i s section i s Robert Sayre of t h e
Western U t i l i z a t i o n Research and Development Division of ARS, USDA at
Albany, California.
DR. SAYRJ3: Thank you. I would l i k e t o t a k e t h i s opportunity t o
express my appreciation t o t h e o t h e r members of my comrmtttee f o r t h e i r
excellent help and advice during t h e development of t h i s program. D r . Fred
Deatherage, Dr. Harold Hedrick, Dr. Paul Lewis and Dr. J i m Stouffer.
We are q u i t e f o r t u n a t e t o have with u s Dr. John Whitaker from t h e
University of California. He i s p r e s e n t l y on a one year sabbatical leave
and i s working i n t h e Department of Chemistry at Northwestern University.
D r . Whitaker received h i s Ph.D. degree under Dr. Eeatherage at Ohio S t a t e
and after a t o u r i n the army has been at t h e University of C a l i f o r n i a at
Davis. H i s Ph.D. work w a s i n t h e l i n e of p r o t e i n h y d r o l i s i s on ion exchange
resins, and work since then has been with p r o t e o l y t i c enzymes. A t t h i s
time it gives me g r e a t pleasure to present Dr. John Whitaker.
DR. WHITmR:
Thank you, D r . S a p e .
############