FLIGHT International, 104 262kt (205kt IAS) for 5001b/hr total fuel flow (a specific of 0-52 n.m./lb). This compares with figures published in the manual, where, at this temperature, the best performance would have been obtained at Flight Level 200. Stalls are carried out between 15,000 and 10,000ft and, in each case, trimmed at 1 • 4Vs, the anticipated stall speed for our weight of 6,3831b. It serves to indicate the negligible change in trim with flap and no apparent change in trim with undercarriage. There is just a minor noseup pitch as flaps cycle from up to 15° and from 15° to 45°. In the clean condition and trimmed at 115kt IAS with J 2 division aft trim, a pull-force developed at 85kt IAS, with the onset of some airframe vibration at the stall warning at 83kt IAS. Full up elevator and moderately heavy buffet gave the elevator limited stall condition at 80kt IAS. Very similar results are obtained with the flaps at 15° and undercarriage down. Trim is the same at 115kt IAS, but in this case a pull force develops below 95kt IAS and stall warning occurs at 82kt IAS, together with airframe vibration. By 80kt IAS the pull force is very heavy, with marked airframe buffet, and the stall is elevator limited at 78kt IAS. With undercarriage down and full flap again there are similar results with an elevator limited stall at 74kt IAS. Docile stall In all cases the stall is very docile without any tendency for a wing to drop. Recovery is immediate on easing the elevator. However, we are at a forward e.g. in the region of 152-57in and elevator limited before reaching the true stall. The flight manual publishes a VMCA of 90kt IAS with undercarriage and flaps up, engine feathered and 5° bank towards the live engine. In this configuration at 10,000ft we get down to 80kt IAS with full rudder deflection at maximum foot force but with plenty of aileron in hand, and note a spot climb rate in the region of 700ft/ min at our weight of 6,3331b. The published single-engine rate of climb at maximum weight in ISA at teea-level is 424ft/min. It is to be noted that this is reduced by 350ft/ min with undercarriage down and, although the undercarriage retracts quickly in 4-5sec, it does bring home the value of autofeather. A simulated engine failure on take-off with undercarriage down on a full power climb at 98kt IAS is no handling problem, and a positive rate of climb is obtained at 9,000ft. On retracting undercarriage and increasing speed to best angle of climb speed 102kt IAS, a spot rate-of-climb check shows some 600ft/min. The benefit of flat rating shows up in the published singleengine ceiling of 19,000ft at maximum weight. It is a pity a slightly more energetic single engine climb is not available at sea level. General handling is excellent, both in symmetric and asymmetric configuration, especially at low speeds. There is a nice but modest degree of positive stability with speed. Both the manual and electric trim rates are right, and change in trim with power is negligible. In the cockpit the sound level is very acceptable and in the air-conditioned cabin it is said to be a low 80 decibels. Just a little experimenting is required to find the best r.p.m. for smoothest running. The view from the cockpit is better than most, and only in the maximum rate of climb speed case at 115kt IAS does the long nose intrude on forward view. What little instrument flying was carried out implies a good and stable platform, and the circuit handling is very much "light aircraft," although undercarriage can be taken at a high 175kt IAS, together with 15° of flap. Final approach is made at 102kt IAS, with a threshold speed of 95kt IAS for our weight of 6,1291b. The trailing-link undercarriage gives a very benign impression. Our ground roll without propeller reversing should have been some 700ft, and about 1,700ft from 50ft—possibly 200ft less with reversing. The well-equipped aircraft flown has a basic weight of 5,3111b, and with fuel tanks full (2,4521b/366 US gal) the pay load is reduced to a total of three persons. With all seven seats occupied (excluding the occasional toilet seat), 1,7741b is available for fuel. Between these two extremes lies the typical executive payload of four passengers and two crew plus a baggage allowance of 1441b. This permits a fuel load of 1,8001b for a maximum ramp weight of 8,2751b. With full IFR reserves (45min holding, two ILS approaches, alternate II July 1981 diversion 65 n.m. plus a 10 per cent fuel contingency allowance), a stage length of 515 n.m. can be flown in 2hr 4min, using 1,0201b of fuel and including a 751b allowance for taxi and take-off. The VFR equivalent stage would be 710 n.m. in 2hr SOmin with 45min reserve. This allows for a cruise climb to FL240 (I6min for 48 n.m. using 1451b fuel) and a cruise at 260kt TAS (lhr 28min for 382 n.m. using 6421b fuel at 4381b/hr), followed by a descent on track (20min for 85 n.m. using 1581b fuel). The cruise specific fuel consumption is 0-59 n.m./lb and the block speed is 249ft (0-54 n.m./ lb). For this weight the take-off e.g. range is between 155-66 and 160-04in at 8,2001b, and without the baggage we are a comfortable 157-52in. However, if we put the baggage weight of 1441b in the nose compartment we run near the forward limit with a e.g. of 156-Olin. An even more interesting situation occurs with the baggage in the aft compartment—a e.g. of 159-65in. At lower aircraft weights the forward e.g. limit widens to 150-65 at 6,4781b or less. As a guide to the operating cost, Gatwick Air Taxis provided a quote for a charter flight from Gatwick to Frankfurt and return—a round trip of some 800 n.m. in a total flying time of 3x2hr. At an inclusive rate of £350 per flying hour for a two-crew operation, the total incurred is £1,225, or approximately £1-50/n.m. — a modest 38p per passenger mile for four passengers. This rate is based on a utilisation of 500 revenue hours per annum, and the charge is down to £325/hr for a charter over 5hr flying time. The UK agent is Northair Aviation at Leeds, and a figure of $1,067,500 is quoted for a very fully equipped Corsair. • Acknowledgements are due to the ATC staff at Bournemouth (Hum) Airport for their co-operation. Q
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz