ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY Analytical Biochemistry 347 (2005) 129–134 www.elsevier.com/locate/yabio A live cell hormone-binding assay on transgenic bacteria expressing a eukaryotic receptor protein Georgy A. Romanov a,b,¤, Lukán Spíchal c, Sergey N. Lomin b, Miroslav Strnad c, Thomas Schmülling a a Free University of Berlin, Institute of Biology/Applied Genetics, D-14195 Berlin, Germany b Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 127276 Moscow, Russia c Institute of Experimental Botany, CAS, and Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Palacký University, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic Received 19 August 2005 Available online 30 September 2005 Abstract The investigation of hormone–receptor interaction normally needs isolation and extensive puriWcation of the receptor protein or a particular receptor-containing fraction. To bypass these time- and resource-consuming procedures, we have established a live cell-based assay using transgenic bacteria expressing single eukaryotic receptors. Here we describe some biochemical features of the Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor CRE1/AHK4 expressed in Escherichia coli. The data show that the main characteristics of the ligand–receptor interaction, including binding aYnity and ligand speciWcity, can be determined using intact bacteria expressing a functional receptor. 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Hormone; Receptor; Cytokinin; Binding assay; Transgenic Escherichia coli The hormone–receptor interaction is a key stage for hormone signaling in the cell; therefore, the characteristics of such an interaction (binding) are of great importance. The binding data serve as ultimate proof of the receptor function of a presumable sensor protein. The hormone–receptor interaction is usually studied using labeled hormone and isolated receptor protein or a particular fraction containing this receptor [1]. In most cases, the procedure of receptor or fraction isolation and puriWcation is time-consuming, needs expensive equipment and chemicals, and leads to unstable receptor preparations. The subsequent binding assay with puriWed receptor or fraction also needs additional equipment to discriminate between bound and unbound hormones. These diYculties become even greater in studies of membrane receptors, which often lose their stability and hormone-binding * Corresponding author. Fax: +7 095 9778018. E-mail address: [email protected] (G.A. Romanov). 0003-2697/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2005.09.012 capacity on puriWcation [2]. In this article, we describe a way in which to accomplish binding assays with a particular membranous receptor without its isolation. The proposed method is based on the use of intact transgenic bacteria (Escherichia coli) expressing a functionally active eukaryotic receptor protein, for example, the membranelocated sensor histidine kinase CRE1/AHK4 that senses the phytohormone cytokinin in Arabidopsis thaliana [3,4]. Cytokinin binds to the predicted approximately 270amino acid extracellular region of the receptor, the socalled CHASE domain [5]. We took advantage of the fact that this receptor was shown to enable E. coli to sense cytokinin [4,6,7] and must, therefore, be present in a functional form. Here we show examples of the use of living transgenic bacteria to characterize the interaction of the receptor with cognate ligands and compare the binding data with results obtained from isolated membranes. The results show that this rapid and inexpensive approach allows the determination of the most important characteristics of the hormone–receptor interaction. 130 Live cell hormone-binding assay / G.A. Romanov et al. / Anal. Biochem. 347 (2005) 129–134 Materials and methods Bacterial strains and growth conditions The E. coli strain KMI001 carrying the vector pINIIIEH, which expresses the Arabidopsis histidine kinase CRE1/AHK4 [4,6], was used in the experiments. This vector provides the bacterial promoter and ribosomebinding sites for expressing any heterologous gene. The E. coli strain KMI001 carrying the empty vector pINIII was used as a control. Bacterial strains were kindly provided by T. Mizuno (Nagoya, Japan). Bacteria were grown overnight in M9 medium (pH 7) with 0.1% casamino acids [8] and 25 g/ml carbenicillin at 24 § 1 °C. Live cell hormone-binding assay For the binding assay, a homogeneous bacterial suspension was aliquoted (0.75 ml) to Eppendorf tubes containing 2.5 l of tritium-labeled trans-zeatin with or without additional unlabeled zeatin. Highly labeled trans-[2-3H]zeatin (592 GBq/mmol) was obtained from the Isotope Laboratory of the Institute of Experimental Botany (Prague, Czech Republic). Radiochemical purity was greater than 99%. For one probe, 1–2 pmol of trans-[2-3H]zeatin (»20,000–40,000 cpm) was used. Routine incubations were done in an ice bath for 30 min. After incubation, bacteria were pelleted at 13.000 rpm for 2 min in the cold, supernatants were carefully vacuum aspirated, and 0.24 ml of 99% ethanol was added to each pellet. The pellet was extracted for at least 1 h with shaking and brieXy centrifuged, and the radioactivity of 0.2 ml of ethanol extract was determined in ACS-II scintillation cocktail (Amersham Biosciences, UK). The analysis of the supernatant [9] showed the absence of protein after bacteria centrifugation. Microsome isolation Membrane isolation from the E. coli strain expressing CRE1/AHK4 was carried out as follows. All steps were done at 4 °C, and all solutions used were precooled. One liter of bacterial culture grown at 25 °C to OD600 » 1 was pelleted, and the pellet was resuspended in 200 ml of cold 0.1 M Tris–HCl (pH 6.8) supplemented with 18% sucrose and pelleted again. The pellet was again resuspended in the same buVer, and the sucrose content was decreased to 10%. Then 100 ml of cold 4 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA,1 pH 7.5) containing lysozyme (0.2 mg/ml) was added, and the suspension was incubated 15 min while swirling. Then 2 ml of 1 M MgCl2 was added, and centrifugation at 10,000g for 20 min was used to separate periplasm (supernatant) and spheroplasts (pellet). The periplasm was stored at 4 °C, and spheroplasts were further processed by 1 Abbreviations used: EDTA, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid; PMSF, phenylmethanesulfonyl Xuoride; BSA, bovine serum albumin. resuspending in 19 ml of 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.8) supplemented with 18% sucrose and 2 mM EDTA. The volume was Wlled up to 20 ml with DNase (10 g/ml), RNase (10 g/ ml), MgCl2 (10 M), phenylmethanesulfonyl Xuoride (PMSF, 1 mM), leupeptin (10 g/ml) and aprotinin (10 g/ ml). Then the cells were lysed by sonication. The lysate was pelleted at 3500g for 15 min, and the supernatant was further centrifuged at 50,000g for 1 h to separate cytoplasm (supernatant) and membranes (pellet). Pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8) containing 0.25 M sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, and 1 mM MgCl2 and was pelleted again at 50,000g for 2 h. Cytoplasm (supernatant) was removed, and the membranes were pooled in 10 ml of 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.4). All fractions were directly assayed in binding assay or stored at 4 °C. The protein content in fractions was determined according to Ref. [9] with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard. Binding assay on microsomes For the binding assay, 200 g of membrane proteins was diluted in 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) containing BSA (1 mg/ml) and dialyzed against the same buVer supplemented with 2 nM [2-3H]zeatin in the presence or absence of increasing concentrations of the studied compound in a Dianorm equilibrium dialyzer (Dianorm–Geräte, Munich, Germany) for 20 h at 4 °C. Radioactivity of the dialysates was measured by scintillation counting using the Beckman LS 6500 scintillation counter (Beckman, Ramsey, MN, USA). Statistics Each data point of experiments represents the average of two or three independent determinations. The signiWcance of diVerences between mean values was evaluated using a t test. Experiments were performed at least in duplicate with similar results. Results and discussion One of the most important tasks in a study of hormone– receptor complex formation is the quantitative discrimination between bound and unbound hormones. Bound hormone should, in turn, be assigned to speciWc and/or nonspeciWc binding [1]. The commonly used approach is to make the receptor insoluble while the free hormone remains fully soluble. Soluble and insoluble phases are easily separated, such as by appropriate centrifugation, allowing the hormone fraction bound to receptors and the unbound fraction to be discriminated quantitatively. When a given receptor is expressed inside bacteria, it remains in the insoluble phase, whereas unbound hormone is always located in the soluble phase except for a minor part that can be mechanically trapped by bacterial cells—the socalled nonspeciWc binding. Receptors that are expressed in bacteria are easily accessible to hormones, and the bacterial suspension can be aliquoted quantitatively to produce stan- Live cell hormone-binding assay / G.A. Romanov et al. / Anal. Biochem. 347 (2005) 129–134 Fig. 1. Kinetics of [3H]zeatin binding to the E. coli CRE1/AHK4-expressing clone at diVerent temperatures. TB, total binding; NS, nonspeciWc binding in the presence of approximately 5000-fold excess of unlabeled trans-zeatin. 800 Bond [ 3 H]trans-zeatin (cpm) dard probes. These properties of receptor-synthesizing bacteria provide all of the necessary prerequisites for a simple binding assay. In our experiments, we used transgenic E. coli expressing the Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor CRE1/AHK4 [4,5]. The functional activity of the receptor was proven previously in cytokinin-dependent promoter activation tests because the CRE1/AHK4 histidine kinase couples to an E. coli signaling system with a cps::lacZ fusion gene as target [4,6]. An E. coli strain carrying only the empty vector was used as a control. The presence of cytokinin-binding activity in microsomes of CRE1/AHK4-expressing clones, but not in control clones, was demonstrated in preliminary experiments. Bacteria were grown overnight in liquid medium up to an OD600 close to 1. Then aliquots of the bacterial suspension were incubated with tritium-labeled hormone, trans-[2-3H]zeatin. To discriminate between speciWc saturable binding and nonspeciWc nonsaturable binding, each tube with labeled [3H]zeatin had its counterpart where [3H]zeatin was mixed with a large (»5000-fold) excess of nonlabeled trans-zeatin. Tubes with only [3H]zeatin were to measure total binding (TB), whereas tubes with an excess of nonlabeled zeatin were to determine nonspeciWc binding (NS). The reliable diVerence between total binding and nonspeciWc binding would indicate the presence of speciWc binding (SB) sites [1]. For the Wrst assays, 0.75-ml aliquots of bacterial suspension were mixed with hormones and incubated for 30 min with periodic shaking. Then bacteria were pelleted by brief centrifugation and supernatants were carefully removed by vacuum aspiration. The pellets were used directly for radioactivity determination without additional washing. The results showed large diVerences between total binding and nonspeciWc binding in the case of the CRE1/AHK4expressing clone but not in the case of the control clone (Table 1). This result was obtained in several repetitions and variable assay conditions. This indicated that the cyto- 131 TB 600 400 SB NS 200 0 6,0 6,5 7,0 7,5 8,0 pH Table 1 Binding of [3H] trans-zeatin to the E. coli strain KMI001, expressing the CRE1/AHK4 receptor gene (pINIII–AHK4) or harboring the empty vector (pINIII) Total binding NonspeciWc bindingb SpeciWc bindingc Vector Experiment numbera PINIII–AHK4 1 2 3 665.0 § 6 733.5 § 41 773.5 § 38 98.0 § 8 106.5 § 7 116.5 § 15 567.0 627.0 657.0 pINIII 1 2 3 89.0 § 7 98.5 § 9 161.5 § 24 85.0 § 2 99.5 § 21 179.0 § 2 2.0 ¡1.0 ¡17.5 a Results of several independent experiments are shown. Data are cpm of radiolabeled zeatin. b NonspeciWc binding was determined in the presence of approximately 5000-fold excess of unlabeled trans-zeatin. c The resulting speciWc binding represents the diVerence between total binding and nonspeciWc binding. Fig. 2. pH dependence of [3H]zeatin binding to the E. coli CRE1/AHK4expressing clone. The pH values were adjusted by adding small volumes of concentrated NaOH or HCl to the bacterial suspension. SB, speciWc binding. For other abbreviations, see Fig. 1. kinin-speciWc binding in CRE1/AHK4 clones was due to the expression of the eukaryotic cytokinin receptor. Thereafter, we studied diVerent parameters in more detail. Fig. 1 shows the [3H]zeatin-binding kinetics at diVerent temperatures (0, 20, and 37 °C). The total binding was inXuenced by the incubation temperature, which had a marginal inXuence on nonspeciWc binding. The speciWc binding proceeded rapidly and reached an apparent equilibrium after 5–15 min (more rapidly at higher temperatures). At 37 °C, a longer incubation time (60 min) led to some decrease in binding (Fig. 1). On the whole, the level of bound hormone seemed to be rather stable during the entire 132 Live cell hormone-binding assay / G.A. Romanov et al. / Anal. Biochem. 347 (2005) 129–134 2000 1500 1000 3 Bond [ H]trans-zeatin (cpm) period (5–60 min) of the assay. The highest level of speciWcally bound zeatin was observed at 0 °C (ice bath); therefore, all subsequent binding assays were performed at this temperature. The pH dependence of binding is shown in Fig. 2. The nonspeciWc binding showed a tendency to rise at pH extremes, but no drastic diVerences in speciWc binding was observed in the pH range between 6 and 8. The binding at pH 7 was close to the optimum; therefore, we continued binding experiments at the pH of the standard M9 medium (i.e., pH 7). The competition of various signaling molecules with [3H]zeatin for binding sites on the bacteria (Fig. 3) revealed a high degree of speciWcity; among various compounds, including auxins, abscisic acid, gibberellic acid, and some others, only cytokinin was able to diminish the bound radioactivity. The binding of various concentrations of [3H]zeatin to the CRE1/AHK4-expressing bacteria is shown in Fig. 4. The result clearly shows that the binding is saturable, indicating that the number of binding sites is limited. A Scatchard analysis of these data yielded an apparent aYnity constant (Kd) of approximately 2.5 nM for CRE1/ AHK4 to zeatin (Fig. 4), and this value was conWrmed in several independent experiments. This value is close to that reported earlier (»4.5 nM) for 3H-labeled isopentenyl adenine interaction with isolated Schizosaccharomyces pombe membranes containing the CRE1/AHK4 receptor [6]. We have also determined the Kd of the zeatin–CRE1/AHK4 interaction using partially puriWed microsomes from the CRE1/AHK4-expressing bacterial clone. The Kd values obtained on microsomes (»6 nM) were close to those obtained with bacteria, conWrming the validity of results obtained with intact bacterial cells. The concentration of cytokinin-binding sites in the suspension of transgenic bacteria was close to 0.1–0.2 nM. This value corresponds to 0.5 to 1.2 £ 1014 sites in 0.75 ml of the bacterial suspension used in the standard assay. If one 500 0 tZ IAA 2,4-D ABA GA cAMP Spe Control Fig. 3. Competition of various signaling substances with [3H]zeatin for the binding to CRE1/AHK4-expressing bacteria. All substances were tested in the same concentration (8.6 M) except spermine (17.3 M). tZ, trans-zeatin; IAA and 2,4-D, auxins; ABA, abscisic acid; GA, gibberellic acid; cAMP, cyclic AMP; Spe, spermine. Fig. 4. Binding of various amounts of [3H]zeatin to CRE1/AHK4-expressing bacteria. Original data and Scatchard plot (inset) are shown. For abbreviations, see Figs. 1 and 2 legends. assumes that each receptor possesses one ligand-binding site [5], then the number of CRE1/AHK4 receptors per transgenic bacterial cell is calculated to be approximately 50,000–120,000. The speciWcally bound radioactivity was approximately 1.5 £ 10¡4 Bq per bacterium. The ligand speciWcity of CRE1/AHK4 was tested by comparing the abilities of various cytokinin analogues to compete with [3H]zeatin for CRE1/AHK4 binding. Five diVerent zeatin-related compounds—trans-zeatin, cis-zeatin, zeatin riboside, dihydrozeatin, and zeatin O-glucoside—were tested in a concentration range of 0.025–2.5 M. The resulting displacement curves (Fig. 5A) indicate that trans-zeatin has the highest aYnity for the receptor. Zeatin riboside, dihydrozeatin, and cis-zeatin display decreasing aYnities, and zeatin O-glucoside was not able to displace [3H]zeatin. When using puriWed CRE1/AHK4-containing microsomes, the same order of hormonal activity of compounds was obvious: trans-zeatin > zeatin riboside > dihydrozeatin > cis-zeatin > zeatin O-glucoside (Fig. 5B). The same activity range of these zeatin derivatives was obtained previously using a reporter gene assay on the CRE1/AHK4-expressing E. coli clone [7], conWrming the validity of binding data. These results are also in good agreement with the relative physiological activities of these zeatin-type cytokinins [10]. The study has shown that this simple and quick binding assay using intact transgenic bacteria expressing a eukaryotic receptor protein provides a convenient and reliable tool for the investigation of hormone–receptor interaction. The most important experiments that are commonly performed using puriWed receptor preparations (e.g., determination of binding aYnity, ligand speciWcity, inXuence of environment) are fully feasible with receptors integrated into a bacterial membrane. In some cases (including ours), the functional Live cell hormone-binding assay / G.A. Romanov et al. / Anal. Biochem. 347 (2005) 129–134 133 Fig. 5. Competition of various cytokinin compounds with [3H]zeatin binding to the CRE1/AHK4 receptor in a bacterial suspension (A) and on partially puriWed microsomes (B). tZ, trans-zeatin; cZ, cis-zeatin; tZR, trans-zeatin riboside; DZ, dihydrozeatin; ZOG, zeatin O-glucoside. For other abbreviations, see Fig. 1 legend. activity of integrated receptor can be proven by some kind of reporter gene assay. In this respect, the intact living system oVers an advantage over traditional assays using puriWed receptor preparations. This holds true especially for membranous (plasma membrane) receptors that often have reduced stability on isolation and puriWcation. In bacterial cells, such receptors not only remain stable and functionally active but also are easily accessible for hormones due to localization in the plasma membrane. The common problem of contamination by other binding moieties, such as by other receptors for the same hormone, has no importance in a bacterial assay where only a deWned eukaryotic protein is expressed. Another problem of binding assays might result from hormone and/or receptor degradation and modiWcation during the binding procedure. In our case, the use of bacteria (E. coli) that are evolutionary very far from higher organisms and do not synthesize or use their hormones makes such undesirable metabolic processes unlikely. Moreover, the quick binding assay at ice temperature, as it was used by us, prevents possible receptor and hormone degradation and modiWcation by hazardous enzymatic activities. Although we have presented only one example of an E. coli strain expressing a plant membrane receptor, the method has good potential to be applied successfully with various eukaryotic receptors and bacteria. Recently, we used this method to analyze the properties of another cytokinin receptor, AHK3 (unpublished results). It should be noted that prokaryotes have receptors that are related to the histidine kinase receptors studied by us. This might be advantageous for this type of analysis. However, the level of AHK receptor expression in the E. coli strain was rather moderate; the corresponding band could not be detected in a standard Coomassie-stained gel separating total bacterial proteins (data not shown). According to our estimation, the average level of CRE1/AHK4 expression was equal to 0.5 to 1.2 £ 105 protein molecules per bacterial cell. Taking into account that the binding aYnity of the analyzed CRE1/ AHK4 cytokinin receptor (Kd D 2–6 nM) is one to two orders of magnitude lower than the binding aYnities of some animal hormone–receptor interactions (Kd can be in the picomolar range [11]), far fewer bacterial cells will be needed to assess reliable binding in the case of eVectively expressed receptor possessing higher aYnity to its ligand. It is also clear that proper processing of the protein and correct insertion into the E. coli membrane are required for successful experiments. A possible drawback of the method is that in some cases certain posttranslational modiWcations that might be required for proper functioning (e.g., glycosylation) are not carried out by the E. coli cell. Nevertheless, in our opinion, the advantages outlined above outweigh these possible limitations when using this method. Acknowledgments This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sfb 449), the Russian Foundation of Basic Research (NN 01-04-04002/03-04-04001/0404-49120), and INTAS (N 01-0602). References [1] M.A. Venis, Hormone Binding Sites in Plants, Longman, New York, 1985. [2] P. Cuatrecasas, S. Jacobs (Eds.), Membrane Receptors: Methods for PuriWcation and Characterization, Chapman & Hall, London, 1981. [3] T. Inoue, M. Higuchi, Y. Hashimoto, M. Seki, M. Kobayashi, T. Kato, S. Tabata, K. Shinozaki, T. Kakimoto, IdentiWcation of CRE1 as a cytokinin receptor from Arabidopsis, Nature 409 (2001) 1060– 1063. [4] T. Suzuki, K. Miwa, K. Ishikawa, H. Yamada, H. Aiba, T. Mizuno, The Arabidopsis sensor His-kinase, AHK4, can respond to cytokinins, Plant Cell Physiol. 42 (2001) 107–113. 134 Live cell hormone-binding assay / G.A. Romanov et al. / Anal. Biochem. 347 (2005) 129–134 [5] A. Heyl, T. Schmülling, Cytokinin signal perception and transduction, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6 (2003) 480–488. [6] H. Yamada, T. Suzuki, K. Terada, K. Takei, K. Ishikawa, K. Miwa, T. Yamashino, T. Mizuno, The Arabidopsis AHK4 histidine kinase is a cytokinin-binding receptor that transduces cytokinin signals across the membrane, Plant Cell Physiol. 42 (2001) 1017– 1023. [7] L. Spíchal, N.Y. Rakova, M. RieXer, T. Mizuno, G.A. Romanov, M. Strnad, T. Schmülling, Two cytokinin receptors of Arabidopsis thaliana, CRE1/AHK4 and AHK3, diVer in their ligand speciWcity in a bacterial assay, Plant Cell Physiol. 45 (2004) 1299–1305. [8] J. Sambrook, D.W. Russell, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, third ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2001. [9] M.M. Bradford, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding, Anal. Biochem. 72 (1976) 248–254. [10] H. Sakakibara, Cytokinin biosynthesis and metabolism, in: P.J. Davies (Ed.), Plant Hormones: Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction, Action, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 2004, pp. 95–114. [11] D. Regoli, A. Boudon, J.L. Fauchere, Receptors and antagonists for substance P and related peptides, Pharmacol. Rev. 46 (1994) 551–599.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz