During the 2013-2014 school year, Peer Power continued to demonstrate its positive impact on the academic performance of our tutors and scholars. Data from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) show that students enrolled in the program made significant advances over their predicted performance as well as the performance of their peers. In both Biology and English II, Peer Power students had results nine percentile points higher than expected. In Algebra, Peer Power students were predicted to perform in the 23rd percentile, but their observed results were in the 50th percentile for Tennessee public school students, while other Shelby County Schools students were in the 34th. On average, the Peer Power students performed 14 percentile points higher than predicted, while their SCS counterparts demonstrated no improvement. Because many of them attend lower-performing schools, the Peer Power students were expected to show lower results than SCS students in general, but ultimately, they surpassed all predictions and ended up ten percentile points higher than students not in the program. 2013-2014 bIology tvAAs dAtA Avg. Predicted Percentile vs. Avg. Observed Percentile Before Peer Power, we (percentiles based on all Tennessee public school students) were at 68% passing on the 30 Gateway Exam. With Peer 28 28 Power, we went from a 68% 26 passing rate to 84% in one 24 24 year. The next year, we went SCS -2 Pe rcentile 20 from 88% to 92%. 18 19 16 Dr. Vincent Hunter, Whitehaven High School 14 Predicted Percentile Observed Percentile 10325 Students SCS* ex PEER POWER *SCS = All Shelby County Schools 2013-2014 AlgebrA I tvAAs dAtA Avg. Predicted Percentile vs. Avg. Observed Percentile (percentiles based on all Tennessee public school students) 55 50 50 45 er 40 er Pe 30 31 25 entile SCS +3 Perc w Po e 7P e til en rc 35 +2 34 23 20 15 10 Predicted Percentile Observed Percentile 10986 Students SCS* ex PEER POWER *SCS = All Shelby County Schools we Po ile nt rce Pe 22 22 from 84% to 88%, and then er Pe 9 r+ 81 Students PEER POWER 79 Students PEER POWER 2013-2014 englIsh II tvAAs dAtA Avg. Predicted Percentile vs. Avg. Observed Percentile (percentiles based on all Tennessee public school students) 38 36 36 34 er Pe 32 r we Po +9 30 n rce Pe 29 tile SCS +1 Percen 28 28 tile 27 26 24 22 20 Predicted Percentile Observed Percentile 10332 Students SCS* ex PEER POWER 117 Students PEER POWER *SCS = All Shelby County Schools 2013-2014 eAst hIgh percentIle weIghted AverAge of AlgebrA I, englIsh II, And bIology tvAAs dAtA Avg. Predicted Percentile vs. Avg. Observed Percentile (percentiles based on all Tennessee public school students) 40 38 38 36 ile 34 32 r ee 4 +1 rc Pe w Po P 30 28 er t en 28 SCS No Change 28 26 24 24 22 20 Observed Percentile Predicted Percentile 10548 Students Avg SCS* ex PEER POWER *SCS = All Shelby County Schools 93 Students Avg PEER POWER
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz