1 Blume wrote in the margin here what seems to be a note to himself: “Read law 21.” He wrote similar notes following the references at the end of points 4 and 6 in this series as well. 2 [Blume] Juris dictionis forma - it here means the same as juris forma. 9 Donn. Comm. 34. 3 [Blume] See note to law 7 of this title. This is as penciled in by Blume. The type written original read: “...may be left to the emperor as well as to other men of tank or power.” It would seem to read better as “...may be left to the emperor just as to any other men of rank or power.” 5 [Blume] See C. 6.42.1 and 2. 4 6 [Blume] See Steinwenter, Beiträge 36. Part of this law is found in C. 1.4.40. See note thereto. 7 [Blume] See note to law 7 of this title. 8 [Blume] C. 21, supra. [Blume] Here the testator did not sign his name, though he wrote the whole testament in his own handwriting. The point in question was whether he should not have signed his name, or summoned an eighth witness for him. The law provides that such testament is valid, without either of these requirements. 9 10 [Blume] The provision as to writing the names of the heirs was repealed, as shown immediately above. 11 12 [Blume] See headnote to this title. This sentence ends thusly and the bottom of a page, and the rest is missing.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz