Acute Effects of Low Doses of Alcohol on Left Ventricular Function by Echocardiography By CEDIAR E. DELGADO, M.D., NICHOLAS J. FORTLIN, M.D., AND RICHARD S. Ross, M.D. SUMMARY Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 The ultrasound method for measuring the dimensions of the left ventricle was utilized to study the effect of oral doses of alcohol on left ventricular function in normal volunteers. Systolic time intervals were also measured. Seven subjects received 0.7 g/kg of ethanol (group I) and six subjects received 1.15 g/kg (group II). The peak blood alcohol levels in the two groups were 75 mg/100 ml and 138 mg/100 ml respectively. There was a 6% decrease in the fractional change in the minor axis of the left ventricle in group I patients which resulted in a decrease in ejection fraction (P < 0.05). In group II patients, there was a 3% decrease in the fractional change in the minor axis of the left ventricle, but the change in ejection fraction was not significant. Since there was no significant difference between the physiological effects observed in groups I and II, the two groups were combined. In the combined group, at 30 minutes after the ingestion of alcohol, the heart rate was increased by 11 %, the fractional change in the minor axis of the left ventricle decreased by 6%c, the ejection fraction decreased by 4% (P < 0.01), and Ver decreased by 5%. These data suggest that in normal subjects myocardial contractility is depressed following the ingestion of alcohol. Additional Indexing Words: Ethanol Systolic time intervals Ultrasound PREVIOUS STUDIES in isolated heart muscle fibers, 2 and in experimental animals3' 4'' suggest that acute exposure to alcohol is associated with a depression of myocardial contractility. In alcoholic subjects without evidence of cardiac disease Regan et al. reported that 12 oz of Scotch whiskey (162 ml ethanol) ingested in two hours produced transient depression of left ventricular function, evidenced by elevation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and a simultaneous decrease in the stroke volume index.7 In normal volunteers the noninvasive systolic time intervals method has been used by Ahmed et al. in studies which showed that myocardial contractility wvas depressed by 6 oz of Scotch whiskey (81 ml ethanol) which produced blood levels from 75-110 mg/100 ml.8 The present study utilized echocardiography to record serial changes in ventricular function following acute alcohol ingestion in normal human volunteers. The echocardiographic measurements of ventricular dimensions were compared with systolic time intervals. Subjects and Procedure The subjects were ten normal volunteers, seven males and three females (average age of 29.9 years, range from 22 to 31). They were infrequent users of alcohol and were studied in the fasting condition after 20 minutes of rest in the supine position. Two groups of experiments were conducted which differed only in the alcohol dose. Group I, seven subjects, ingested 0.7 g of ethanol/kg of body weight in less than 30 min. Group II, six subjects, ingested 1.15 g of ethanol/kg in less than 60 min. The alcohol was diluted in orange juice to a total of 400 cc. The alcohol dosage corresponds to between two and three drinks of Scotch whiskey (2 oz per drink), and the blood levels are in the expected range for this dosage. The dose of ethanol exceeds that usually consumed during the course of "social" drinking, especially when the 30 to 60 minute period of administration is considered. Heart rate, blood pressure, echocardiographic and systolic time interval measurements were made two times during the control period and every 30 minutes for the next three hours. A blood sample was obtained for alcohol determinations at the time of each set of measurements. Echocardiography Echocardiograms were obtained with a Smith-Kline Ekoline 20A ultrasonoscope utilizing a 2.25 mHz focused transducer. Recordings were made on a Cambridge multichannel photographic recorder at a paper speed of 50 mm/sec. Standard techniques were employed to obtain the left ventricular minor axis dimension. The measurement of left ventricular minor axis (S) was made on echocardiograms which showed echoes from the mitral apparatus. This precaution assured that serial records used for comparison were obtained with the ultrasound beam crossing the ventri- From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, 'the Johns Hopkins Mledical Institutions, Baltimore, Marvland. Supported in part bh a grant from the LUnited States Bress ers' Associationi. Dr. Delgado X as a Research Fellov, supported bh the American Heart Association, \Iarvland Affiliate. Address for reprints: Richard S. Ross, \1.D., Carnegie 568, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, \larx land 21205. Received November 11, 1974; accepted for publication November 19, 1974. Circulation, Volume 51, March 1975 cle in the same location on each occasion.9 End-diastolic diameter (Sd) was measured at the onset of the QRS. Endsystolic diameter (S,) was measured from the peak systolic 535 DELGADO, FORTUIN, ROSS 5036 Table l Systolic Time Intervals in Group I (0.7 g/kg) Blood alcohol ml/100 ml Control 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 150 min 180 min 74.48 76.29 68.07 62.28 61.20 3.63 - - 10.45 06.21 06.99 10.20 08.29 07.17 Heart rate BP syst (mm Hg) (beats/min) 39.7 - 2.3 66.6 3.3** 66.9 2.5* 64.3 2.7* 65.7 =3.4* 64.0 3.3 67.3 3.0** 111.7 114.3 109.0 108.7 107.6 109.7 109.7 - - 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.5 3.8* 4.8 4.7* BP diast (mm Hg) SD cm 68.6 3.1 71.1 3.1 70.0 2.7 69.7 2.7 66.9 2.4 69.7 3.7 68.8 i 3.1 0.16 4.81 4.80 0.16 4.80 0.17 4.81 i 0.16 4.78 0.16 4.73 0.16 4.76 0.17 Ss cm 3.16 3.28 3.26 3.26 3.17 3.10 3.17 - - 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.16 Mean values standard error are shown. Statistical significance (paired t), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Abbreviations: SD = end-diastolic diameter; QS2 = electromechanical systole; Ss = end-systolic diameter; LVET = left venitricular ejection time; E.F. ejection fraction; PEP = pre-ejection period; V,f = Mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening. Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 motion of the endocardial echo of the left ventricular posterior wall to the left side of the interventricular septal echo. An average of five beats was taken as the value for each dimension. At the completion of the study the records were coded. The minor axis dimension was measured independently by two observers without knowledge of the conditions at the time of study. Results The blood alcohol values are listed in tables 1 and 2 and are plotted in figure 1. Subjects in group I ingested 0.7 g of ethanol/kg in less than 30 minutes and Derived Echocardiographic Volumes and Contractility Indices Ventricular volumes at end diastole and end systole were calculated from V = 1.047 S3.` The stroke volume and ejection fraction were calculated from the end-diastolic and The systolic volumes. SV = EDV -ESV, EF = EDV fractional change of the left ventricular minor axis during systole (% A S) = Sd - S,/Sd.' The mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (Vcf) was calculated from SdSd *dt ;" dt was the left ventricular ejection time measured from the simultaneously recorded carotid pulse. dS Systolic Time Intervals Systolic time intervals`2 13 were measured from simultaneous recordings of the carotid pulse, electrocardiogram, and phonocardiogram from the third left intercostal space. The Cambridge multichannel system was utilized for recording at a paper speed of 100 mm/sec. The following measurements were made: electromechanical systole (QS,) from the onset of the Q wave of the electrocardiogram to the first rapid deflection of the aortic component of the second heart sound; left ventricular ejection time (LVET) taken from the onset of the rapid upstroke of the carotid pulse to the incisura of the dicrotic notch; preejection period (PEP) = QS2 - LVET. A mean value of five beats was used as the value for each measurement. Blood pressure was obtained by sphygmomanometer and heart rate was measured directly from the electrocardiogram. Blood Alcohol Determinations Ethanol concentrations were determined in all serum samples by gas-liquid chromatography under the direction of Dr. Esteban Mezey at the Alcoholism Research Unit of the Baltimore City Hospitals.'4 Statistics The results were analyzed by the Student's paired t-test. (.3 -. MINUTES MEASUREMENTS xx X (-HEART RATE X X X X X X -PLOOD? PRESSURE -ECHOCARD/OGRA PH/C LEFT VENTRICULAR MINOR AXIS Y-SYSTOLIC TIME INTERVALS Figure 1 Blood alcohol levels. Mean values ± standard error are shown. Solid line = group I (0.7 g/kg); Broken line = Group II (1.15 g/kg). Ingestion period presented at bottom left: Group I = 0.7 glkg in less than 30 minutes. Group II = 1.15 g/kg in less than 60 minutes. Circulation, Volume 51, March 1975 537 EFFECT OF ALCOHOL ON LV FUNCTION SD-SS 0.34 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.33 Vef E.F. SD 0.02 0.02* 0.02** 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.71 0.02 0.68 0.02* 0.68 0.02* 0.68 0.03 0.69 0.04 0.71 0.03 0.69 l 0.03 cire/sec 1.10 1.05 1.06 1.06 1.09 1.13 1.09 - - f 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.07 0.07 QS2 msec LVET mseC 417.0 8.2 411.3 - 10.7 409.3 £ 8.1 412.3 7.6 409.4 7.7 413.0 7.1 419.7 - 7.8 310.4 7.4 303.0 9.3 300.4 - 7.8* 304.3 W 7.5* 305.3 8.0 303.9 1 8.6 305.8 ± 9.8 Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 following this a mean peak blood alcohol level of 75 mg/100 ml was attained at between 30-60 minutes. The blood alcohol concentration fell slowly and 70% of the peak concentration was still present at the end of three hours. Subjects in group II received the larger dose (1.15 g/kg) over a longer period (60 min) and in this group the mean peak blood alcohol value of 138 mg/100 ml was reached at 60 minutes. At 30 minutes the mean value was 86 mg/100 ml. At the end of three hours the blood level was 80% of the peak value. The physiological observations are presented in tables 1, 2, and 3 for the low dose group, the high dose group, and total group, respectively. In group I, the low dose group (table 1), the heart rate increased from 60 beats/min to a value of 67 beats/min at 30 and 60 minutes. This 12% change was significant (P < 0.01) and persisted throughout the period of observation. There was a 6% decrease in the fractional change of the left ventricular minor axis %,\ S, as measured by the echocardiographic method (P < 0.01), and this resulted in a 4% decline in ejection fraction. Both measurements had returned to control values by 90 minutes. The changes in QS2, LVET, and PEP were small and of borderline significance (P < 0.05) throughout the period of observation despite the 12% increase in heart rate. In group II, the high dose group (table 2), the heart rate increased by 8% at 30 minutes, but the change did not achieve statistical significance. The fractional change in the minor axis %/S decreased by 3% at 60 minutes (P < 0.05). The associated decrease in ejection fraction did not achieve significance. The mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening decreased from 1.22 ± 0.06 to 1.19 ± 0.06 circumferences/sec at 60 minutes (P < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the systolic time intervals. Thus, although the group II subjects ingested a larger quantity of alcohol over a longer time and had higher blood levels, the changes in heart rate and contractility were similar in direction, but smaller than in the group I subjects. Because of this lack of significant difference Circulation, Volume 51, March 1975 - PEP 106.6 108.3 108.9 108.0 104.1 109.1 113.8 - - i PEP/ET 3.2 4.4 4.1 4.4 3.8 3.7 4.1 0.01 0.34 0.36 i 0.02 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.02 0.35 0.02 0.36 - 0.02 0.38 - 0.02 between the physiological effects observed in the two groups, the two groups I and II were combined and the results of this combined group are presented in table 3 and plotted in figure 2. Heart rate increased by 11% from 62 to 68 beats/min at 30 minutes (P < 0.001) and remained significantly elevated *p<.05 **O<.01 N=/3SL/IBJECS .75 k .74, K- .73. T .72 .7/ 70- /.204. *~ // Wi /05 'I ,.* ,* .. 1. /10+ 11 _ /00*. K 70+ 654 60' t Cn /20+ //0' 180 i i ~ i i i 60 , . . . C 30 60 90 A /20 /50 /30 TIME (Minutes) Figure 2 Effects of Alcohol on Indices of Cardiac Function, total group. Time in minutes is shown on the abcissa. C = control values. Ejection fraction = ratio of stroke volume to end-diastolic volume. V( = velocity of circumferential fiber shortening. PEP= preejection period. DELGADO, FORTUIN, ROSS 538 Table 2 Systolio Time Intervals in Group II (1.15 g/kg) Blood alcohol Control 30 min 60 min 90 120 150 180 min min min min Mean values 86.50 137.55 126.32 130.06 117.52 110.42 - - - 21.08 07.72 13.31 16.78 12.25 12.03 BP syst (mm Hg) Heart rate (beats/min) ml/100 ml 65.0 70.7 67.7 68.3 67.7 64.8 66.3 - - 118.8 120.0 115.7 114.3 115.2 114.5 112.8 3.0 3.9 4.2 4.9 5.6 5.6 4.7 - - 6.1 6.5 7.9 6.4 7.3 7.3* 5.2* BP diast (mm Hg) 75.3 75.8 74.0 - - 73.2 72.0 72.0 71.5 - 3.5 4.0 4.3 3.9 3.9 4.0 3.1 SD cm Ss cm 4.99 - 0.13 4.99 - 0.12 5.00 - 0.11 0.13* 4.91 0.13 4.97 4.97 - 0.13 0.11* 4.89 3.10 0.15 3.17 0.16 3.16 i 0.13 3.16 0.12 3.07 i 0.14 :3.12 0.14 3.09 i 0.14 standard error are preseinted. Statistical significance (paired t), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. For abbreviations see table 1. Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 Table 3 Combined Group (13 Subjects) Heart rate (beats/min) Control 30 mi' 60 min 90 min 120 miii 150 min 180 mill 61.8 68.5 67.2 66.2 66.6 64.4 66.8 - - 2.0 2.5*** 2.2** 2.6* 3.0* 3.0 2.7* BP syst (mm Hg) 115.4 116.9 112.8 111.3 111.1 112.0 111.2 - - 3.8 3.7 4.2 3.7 3.9 4.1 3.4 BP diast SD (mm Hg) 71.8 73.3 71.8 71.3 69.2 70.7 70.1 - - cm 2.6 2.0 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.6 2.1 4.91 - 0.11 4.89 - 0.10 4.89 - 0.11 4.86 - 0.10 4.87 - 0.11 4.84 - 0.11 4.83 - 0.10 SD-SS Ss cm 3.14 3.23 3.21 3.21 3.13 3.11 ) 3.13 - SD 0.10 0.10* 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.09 -. 10 0.366 0.34 0.34 0.34 O 0.35 - 0.35 0.35 - 0.01 0.01* 0.01** 0.01* 0.02 0.01 0.01 Mean values - standard errors are showis. Statistical analysis (paired t), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. throughout the period of observation. The echocardiographic measurement of the fractional change in the minor axis %zAS was significantly decreased by 6% at 30, 60, and 90 minutes (P < 0.01). This resulted in a 4% decrease in ejection fraction which was significant at 30, 60, and 90 minutes. The mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (VCf) decreased by 5% during the same 30-90 minute period (P < 0.01). All echocardiographic indices of contractility returned to baseline by 120 minutes. There were no significant changes in systolic time intervals QS2 and LVET when groups I and II were analyzed together, as in table III. The PEP was increased at 180 minutes, but this change was of only borderline significance (P < 0.05). Discussion The direct measurement of the dimensions of the left ventricle by ultrasound has provided evidence of depression of myocardial contractility in normal volunteers following the ingestion of alcohol. The fractional change in the minor axis of the left ventricle in systole was decreased significantly at 30 and 60 minutes following the ingestion of alcohol. The in- dices of myocardial contractility derived from the measurement of the minor axis also showed depression. The changes were small (5-12%) in these healthy, young subjects but assume more significance when it is recognized that they occurred at a time when the heart rate was increased. An increase rather than a decrease in contractility would have been expected in healthy young subjects and, therefore, these small changes assume more significance if the association with increased heart rate is considered.`5 18, 17 'The effect of increased heart rate must also be considered in interpretation of the systolic time intervals.12 In this study there was no large change in these indices, but the improvement which would have been expected with tachycardia failed to occur. Ahmed et al., in a similar study, demonstrated decreased contractility as evidenced by increases in PEP and PEP/LVET in a group of normal volunteers.8 Previous studies had reported an increase in heart rate and cardiac output and no impairment of the response to exercise following alcohol ingestion.'8 19 These studies had been interpreted as indicating that alcohol had no significant effects on the normal heart. Circulation, Volume 51, March 1975 EFFECT OF ALCOHOL ON LV FUNCTION SD-SS SD E.F. 0.02 0.02 0.01* 0.02 - 0.02 0.38 0.01 0.37 - 0.02 0.02 0.76 0.75 (0.02 0.75a 0.01 0.73 0.02 0.77 0.02 0.75 0.02 0.75 = 0.02 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.39 - Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 E.F. 0.02 0.73 4 .71 0.02** 0.02** 0.71 0.02** 0.70 0.73 0.02 0.02 0.73 0.72 0.02 V Cf cire/sec 1.16 0.04 1.10 0.04** 1.12 0.04* 1.11 (0.04* 1.135 0.06 1.17 0.04 1.14 0.05 V'f circ/sec 1.22 0.06 1.17 & 0.07 0.06*** 1.19 0.04 1.17 1.22 0.08 1.22 - 0.06 1.19 - 0.08 S.V. 92.1 5.6 87.6 5.3 6.1 89.1 85.6 -).3 .5.4 89.7 88.5 , .8 86.0 , .2 539 QS2 msec 409.8 - 7.5 413.2 - 10.5 414.2 - 13.6 412.8 - 15.7 420.2 - 16.0 409.7 - 14.2 413.2 - 11.6 QS mseC 413.7 413.1 411.35 412.3 414.4 411.5 417.4 - - The current studies lead to another conclusion in that they confirm in man the effects of alcohol on contractility which have been observed in isolated heart muscle fibers and in both anesthetized and conscious intact animals. In these animal and in vitro studies concentrations of alcohol similar to those found in the blood of the subjects in the current study produced a reduction in contractility. The current study and that of Ahmed et al. demonstrate the direct effect of alcohol on the contractility of the normal human myocardium. These minor changes in contractility do not, however, impair the function of the heart as a pump. Presumably, compensatory mechanisms are responsible for the preservation of over-all circulatory function in the presence of decreased contractility. All evidence suggests that alcohol acts as a direct depressant of myocardial cell function. An alternative explanation, proposed by Regan, was that the effect was related to the change in plasma osmolarity and plasma volume.3 Ahmed gave normal volunteers alcohol and an isosmotic, isocaloric, isovolumic sucrose solution orally and measured systolic time inCirculation, Volume 51, March 1975 LVET PEP msec msec 8.7 - 11.2 - 12.9 - 13.1 316.8 - 15.2 306.7 - 12.3 311.3 - 10.8 309.8 314.2 312.2 305.8 - LVET msec 3.4 7.3 7.3 7.9 8.2 7.3 6.7 310.2 .).4 308.2 7.1 303.8 7.2 305.()0 7.0 ,31 0.6 ( 8.0 303.2 7.0 7.0 308.7 100.0 101.0 102.0 107.0 103.3 103.0 103.7 - - - PEP/ET 2.7 1.1 3.5 3.1 1.7 2.1 2.; PEP 103.3 2.2 104.9 + 2.6 2.8 105.7 2.6 107.4 2.1 103.7 106.3 - 2.3 108.7 - 2.7* 0.33 0.01 0.32 - 0.01 0.33 - 0.02 0.35 - 0.01* 0.33 - 0.01 0.34 - 0.01 0.34 - 0.01 = PEP/ET 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.33 0.33)0.33 0.35 - 0.009 0.012 0.014 0.011* 0.011 0.011* 0.014 tervals.8 Alcohol depressed and the sucrose increased contractility, and therefore increased osmolarity cannot be the explanation for the contractility changes seen after oral alcohol administration. The lack of correlation between the blood alcohol concentration and the cardiac effects presents a problem in interpretation. In the first place, there was no significant difference between the hemodynamic effects of the two dose levels. Furthermore, the hemodynamic changes persisted for only 30 to 60 minutes, yet the blood alcohol remained elevated throughout the entire three hours of the experiment. In the low dose group, changes in ventricular function are seen at 30 and 60 minutes when the mean blood alcohol levels were between 70 and 80 mg/100 ml. Much higher blood levels between 110 and 120 mg/100 ml were present at 120, 150 and 180 minutes in the high dose group (II) and no alteration in cardiac function was apparent at that time. These observations could be explained by postulating that the time and concentration characteristics of the build up of blood alcohol in the blood during the first 30 to 60 DELGADO, FORTUIN, ROSS 5040 Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 minutes determine the degree of myocardial depressioIn and that the blood levels at later points in time are unimportant. It also appears that within those dosage ranges, the higher dose is not associated with a larger effect. This suggests that a threshold level is reached which produces depression of function, and this in turn initiates a compensatory reaction which restores the homeostasis. A similar lack of correlation of blood level and effect was observed by Juchems who found that normal volunteers ingesting 0.9 to 1.9 ml/kg of ethanol evidenced a 13% increase in heart rate at blood levels of 85 mg/100 ml.20 No further increase in heart rate was observed with blood alcohol levels above 100 mg/100 ml. A similar effect was observed by Conway who found no correlation between blood alcohol levels and hemodynamic changes in eight patients with coronary artery disease.2' Both differing absorption and the compensatory responses of the autonomic nervous system have been suggested as responsible for this lack of relationship between dose and effect. Lack of absorption cannot be a factor in the current study and in others in which direct measurements of blood alcohol have been made. The compensatory response of the autonomic nervous system probably provides a better explanation. The role of the autonomic nervous system has been investigated by Wong4 who studied the effect of alcohol with and without beta blockade in anesthetized dogs. Her results show that the depressant effects of ethanol are greater in animals with autonomic blockade by atropine and propranolol.4 Horwitz and associates were not able to demonstrate an effect of autonomic blockade in modifying the response to ethanol in conscious dogs, but they used a smaller dose of propranolol than in Dr. Wong's study.5 Acknowledgment The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Esteban Mezey of the Baltimore City Hospitals who arranged to have the blood alcohol levels measured in his laboratory. The authors also wish to express their appreciation to Mrs. Susan V. Livengood, Technical Director of The Graphics Laboratory, for her assistance in the conduct of these studies. References 1. Si'.\N JF Jo, MASOx- DT, BEISER GD, GOLD HK: Actions of ethanol on the contractile state of normal and failing cat papillary muscle. (abstr) Clin Res 16: 249, 1968 2. GixiFxo AL, GINMENo MF, WEBB TL: Effect of ethanol on cellular membrane potential and contractility of isolated rat atrium. Am J Physiol 203: 194, 1962 3. Ri(.vx TJ, KoiioXE\ii)is G, MOS HOS CB, OLDEwL-RTEIElHA, i ii s'n PH, HELLEMS HK: The acute metabolic and hemodynamic responses of the left ventricle to ethanol. J Clin Invest 45: 270, 1966 4. Wom;. M: Depression of cardiac performance by ethanol unmasked during autonomic blockade. Am Heart J 86: 508, 1973 5. Houvii<Rllz LD, AiKINS JM: Acute effects of ethanol on left ventricular performance. Circulation 49: 124, 1974 6. WEBBo WR, DFEFEILI IV: Ethyl alcohol and the cardiovascular system. JAMA 191: 1055, 1965 7. R(.sx TJ, LE\-INSoN GE, OLDEWUOTEL HA, FRAN\K MJ, WEISSE AB, Mos( iios CB: Ventricular function in non-cardiacs with alcoholic fatty liver: Role of ethanol in the production of cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest 48: 397, 1969 8. AilxIFo) SS, LFvisoN\ GE, REG.s-\ TJ: Depression of myocardial contractilitv with low doses of ethanol in normal man. Circulation 48: 378, 1973 9. Fooi l L-i\ NJ, Hooi) WP, SHIE1MMN. ME, CRAIoF E: Determination of left ventricular volumes by ultrasound. Circulation 44: 575, 1971 10. PONIB0 JF, Tiioo BL, RUSSEL L RO: Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by echocardiography. Circulation 43: 480, 1970 11. FooTUIN NJ, HooD WP, CSAIGE E: Evaluation of left ventricular function by echocardiography. Circulation 46: 26, 1972 12. Wi ii EO AM, H sims WS, SC HOENFELD CD: Bedside technics for the evaluation of ventricular function in man. Am J Cardiol 23: 577, 1969 13. Wi issi I AM, HAsIIIs VWS, SCHOENFELD CD: Systolic time intervals in heart failure in man. Circulation 37: 149, 1968 14. NlizF.- S, ToBAN F: Rates of ethanol clearance and activities of the ethanol-oxidizing enzymes in chronic alcoholic patients. Gastroenterology 61: 707, 1971 15. D\s)Eii EM: Left ventricular pressure-volume alterations and regional disorders of contraction during myocardial ischemia induced by atrial pacing. Circulation 42: 1111, 1970 16. M( L,xURIN LP, ROLETir EL, GoossMiAN W: Impaired left ventricular relaxation during pacing-induced ischemia. Am J Cardiol 32: 751, 1973 17. BIT xxx SLI) E, SONNENBLICK EH, Ross J Jo, GLICK G, EisTEIN SE: Analysis of the cardiac response to exercise. Circ Res 20-21 (suppl I): 1-44, 1967 18. Ri-- DP, JAIx AC, DoYLE JT: Acute hemodynamic effects of ethanol on normal human volunteers. Am Heart J 78: 592, 1969 19. Bio\i(;\iSi G, SALIIN B, MI41I HELI, JH: Acute effects of ethanol ingestion on the response to submaximal and maximal exercise in man. Circulation 42: 463, 1970 20. J( hF Xi! R, KLOBE R: Hemodynamic effects of ethyl alcohol in man. Am Heart J 78: 133, 1969 21. CONx\\ s N: Hemodynamic effects of alcohol in patients with coronary heart disease. Br Heart J 30: 638, 1968 Circulation, Volume 51, March 1975 Acute effects of low doses of alcohol on left ventricular function by echocardiography. C E Delgado, N J Gortuin and R S Ross Circulation. 1975;51:535-540 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.51.3.535 Downloaded from http://circ.ahajournals.org/ by guest on June 18, 2017 Circulation is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 Copyright © 1975 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0009-7322. Online ISSN: 1524-4539 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/51/3/535 Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published in Circulation can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document. Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at: http://www.lww.com/reprints Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Circulation is online at: http://circ.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz