BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
The BBC has updated its cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure
that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes
cookies from third party social media websites if you visit a page
which contains embedded content from social media. Such third
party cookies may track your use of the BBC website. We and our
partners also use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that
is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings,
we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the BBC
website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any
time.
Cookies on the
BBC website
News
Sport
Weather
Shop
Earth
Travel
Continue
Change settings
Find out more
More
Search
ADVERTISEMENT
Home 
Film Music Art Style Books Design Columns Programmes Art
history
Why these anatomical
d l
t di
ti
By Fiona Macdonald
26 May 2016






http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting

Nightmares in wax
A tiny foetus, its foot kicking out of a womb; an intestine piled up next to a lifeless figure, her torso
ripped open from the string of pearls on her neck to her abdomen. Our natural reaction is to recoil
with disgust, to dismiss these eerie waxworks as freak show objects. Yet to do so is to
misunderstand them, says the author of a new book. “They do say something different to us today
from what they meant at the time,” says Joanna Ebenstein, co-founder of the Morbid Anatomy
Museum in New York. Her book The Anatomical Venus reveals how a figure that provokes an
uneasy reaction in viewers now was once a popular tool for instruction. This Anatomical Venus,
produced by the workshop at La Specola in Florence between 1784 and 1788, is displayed in her
original rosewood and Venetian glass case at the Josephinum, Vienna, Austria. (Credit:
Josephinum, Collections and History of Medicine, MedUni Vienna/Photo Joanna Ebenstein)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
Skin deep
Created between 1780 and 1782, the original anatomical Venus by Clemente Susini (pictured) can
still be seen at La Specola – the public science museum founded by Leopold II in Florence. Also
known as ‘the Medici Venus’, the life-size wax figure has real human hair, and can be dissected
into seven anatomically correct layers. She spawned numerous copies, referred to as Slashed
Beauties or Dissected Graces and also displayed in medical museums. “Supine in their glass
boxes, they beckon with a gentle smile or an ecstatic downcast gaze,” writes Ebenstein in The
Anatomical Venus. “One idly toys with a plait of real golden human hair; another clutches at the
plush, moth-eaten satin cushions of her case as her torso erupts in a spontaneous, bloodless
auto-dissection; another is crowned with a golden tiara, while one further wears a silk ribbon tied in
a bow around a dangling entrail.” (Credit: Museo di Storia Naturale Università di Firenze,
Zoologica, ‘La Specola’, Italy/Photo Joanna Ebenstein)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
Fairground attraction
It’s a world away from Madame Tussauds. No grinning faces to be photographed in selfies; no
celebrity glamour or statesmanlike poses. These are waxworks that both intrigue and repulse:
models that seem to hover somewhere between freak show and operating theatre. Ebenstein aims
to place them in their cultural context, looking at the history of the anatomical Venus and finding
out where it fits in the 21st Century. “Since their creation in late-18th-Century Florence, these wax
women have seduced, intrigued, and instructed. In the 21st Century, they also confound, flickering
on the edges of medicine and myth, votive and vernacular, fetish and fine art,” she writes in her
opening chapter. “How can we understand today an object that is at once a seductive
representation of ideal female beauty and an explicit demonstration of the inner workings of the
body? How can we make sense of an artefact that was once equally at home in the fairground and
the medical museum?” This life-size 40-piece anatomical Venus is from Pierre Spitzner’s 19thCentury collection. (Credit: Université de Montpellier anatomical collection/Photo Marc
Dantan/Courtesy of Thames & Hudson Ltd)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
Cultural curiosity
Ebenstein had to wrestle with her own feelings when she first encountered the Venus. “It’s so
confusing, and it has such power when you see it, it’s hard not to be drawn in,” she tells BBC
Culture. “I was trying to figure out how to make sense of it – it looks so bizarre to us now. Of all the
forms an anatomical teaching tool could take, how come it was that one?” She overcame her initial
reaction by reading about the Venus and looking at figures in different settings. “I went to other
kinds of museums and churches to try and understand the context of the culture that created it,
which made me start thinking about it in a very different way from most people in the medical
museum world,” she says. “My background is intellectual history, so when I look at an object that
looks strange to us today, my first thought is ‘Why? Did it look strange to people at the time? What
does it say about us that it now looks strange?’” (Credit: Josephinum, Collections and History of
Medicine, MedUni Vienna/Photo Joanna Ebenstein)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
Venus in pearls
Ebenstein realised that the Venus was not an oddity: it was truly a product of its time. Leopold II
founded La Specola after becoming the Grand Duke of Tuscany in 1765; he aimed to educate
Florentines in the empirical observation of natural laws and challenge the more irrational practices
of the Roman Catholic church. His new museum, Ebenstein argues, “would make available to the
general public the rare and valuable cultural artefacts previously secreted in the Medici
Wunderkammern, or cabinets of wonder”. In a period when the study of the natural world included
what we know today as science, aesthetics and metaphysics, she claims, “the Medici Venus was a
perfect embodiment of the Enlightenment values of her time, in which human anatomy was
understood as a reflection of the world and the pinnacle of divine knowledge, and in which to know
the human body was to know the mind of God.” Venerina (Little Venus), is a 1782 life-size
dissectible wax model created by the workshop of Clemente Susini at La Specola for Museo di
Palazzo Poggi, Bologna, Italy. (Credit: Museo di Palazzo Poggi, Universita’ di Bologna. Photo
Joanna Ebenstein)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
Dissecting beauty
In a bid to depict humans in a more realistic way, visual artists of the Renaissance carried out their
own dissections – more even than anatomists of the era. According to Ebenstein, Leonardo da
Vinci “is said to have dissected more than 100 bodies, and famously ‘sketched cadavers he had
dissected with his own hand’”. One key anatomical text of 1543, De Humani Corporis Fabrica (On
the Fabric of the Human Body), was illustrated with woodcuts “thought to be by Titian’s studio in
Venice”. That overlap of disciplines was the background for the anatomical Venus. “One of the
things that makes the Venus so hard for us to understand is that we’ve now divided up all those
things in ways that wasn’t divided in the time that it was made,” Ebenstein tells BBC Culture. “We
have this division between art and science, and between religion and medicine, that didn’t exist at
that time.” (Credit: Josephinum, Collections and History of Medicine, MedUni Vienna/Photo
Joanna Ebenstein)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
One foot in the grave
The creators of the ‘Slashed Beauties’ aimed to bring anatomy out of the graveyard. “Most of
anatomical knowledge was derived from dead bodies, and that’s not appropriate for a popular
audience,” says Ebenstein. “So how do you create an object that can take something from the
grave and the cadavers it took to make it, but make people forget that, or not know it, and make
them seduced by it? A lot of her beauty has to do with that, it’s essential to making her a popular
object.” There is a quote in the book from the 18th Century anatomical illustrator Arnaud-Éloi
Gautier D’Agoty: “For men to be instructed, they must be seduced by aesthetics, but how can
anyone render the image of death agreeable?” The waxworks harnessed aesthetics to reach a
larger audience. “The popular part is really important, and I think that part really baffles people,”
says Ebenstein. “They assume the Venus was made for doctors – but it wasn’t, and in that way it
wasn’t made for an audience of men the way some feminists expect it to be – it was made for
men, women and children, that’s really essential to understanding it.” This 1746 mezzotint of a
fashionably coiffed anatomised woman, L’Ange Anatomique (The Flayed Angel), was created by
Arnaud-Éloi’s father Jacques-Fabien Gautier d’Agoty. (Credit: Wellcome Library, London)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
Sleeping beauty
However uncanny they might seem to us, the wax figures were primarily teaching tools. According
to Ebenstein, “Each pristine wax model at the museum was the product of the careful study of
cadavers that were delivered from the nearby Santa Maria Nuova hospital.” They remain close to
life. “Over 200 years after their creation, La Specola’s waxworks are still considered remarkably
accurate, some of them demonstrating anatomical structures that had yet to be named or
described at the time of their making.” Yet in making them more attractive than a cadaver, the
waxwork sculptors were also creating art works. As Ebenstein argues, the anatomical Venus
evoked “a long history of paintings and sculptures of placid, idealised nudes”. And that’s where the
human detail that unnerves us came in. “She is designed to charm in every detail: her glistening
glass eyes are rimmed with real eye-lashes, her bared throat is bound by a string of pearls, and
she boasts a lustrous cascade of human hair.” This figure is known as ‘the Sleeping Beauty’: a
1925 replica of the original piece from 1767, it’s a breathing wax model by Swiss physician and
master wax sculptor Philippe Curtius. (Credit: Madame Tussauds Archives, London. Photo Joanna
Ebenstein)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
The anatomy and the ecstasy
Yet for Ebenstein, the anatomical Venus was not a figure that had been sexualised. “Some
feminists have a kneejerk response to looking at this – I would argue that any fetish element didn’t
exist at the time.” Instead, she argues, the figures tapped into a tradition of religious sculpture.
“Susini, who made the most famous of the Venuses, also made waxes of a dying Christ that were
beautiful.” When we interpret the Venus in this way, she believes, we’re revealing our own cultural
biases. “That expression on her face that we read as erotic today, I do not believe it was seen that
way at the time – because otherwise it wouldn’t be on every saint in the church,” she says.
“Something has changed in us; we can’t see anything without reading a prurient intent into it. I
really don’t believe that’s how they were understood at the time.” In the book, Ebenstein picks out
a sculpture of Gian Lorenzo Bernini’s life-sized white marble masterpiece, the Ecstasy of Saint
Teresa (1647–52) at Santa Maria della Vittoria in Rome (pictured). “It is likely that a different
understanding of the ecstatic than our own influenced Venus’s reception,” she writes. “The ecstatic
was understood at that time not merely as a profane, sensual experience, but as an expression of
the sacred: a mystical experience.” (Credit: Alamy)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
A question of faith
“What it draws on, the language it draws on, is so much broader than you would think, and that
helps to make sense of it,” claims Ebenstein. Attempting to unpick specific influences can be a
thankless task. “There are all these strange overlaps between Catholicism and medicine, in this
desire to preserve and effigise the body. Because the body has all of this meaning: in medicine, it
has meaning because it tells us about the world, and in religion it has meaning because it’s a
healing tool. It’s a very complicated terrain which is difficult to untangle.” The Venus appears at a
time when the two are beginning to unspool. “You have these two different philosophies, science
and medicine versus religion, that are attempting to tell us the answers about where we fit in the
universe, what life is for, what consciousness is, what the body is, and how we deal with death and
disease. Venus is a moment when it’s in both hands: the torch is being passed from one to the
other.” (Credit: Josephinum, Collections and History of Medicine, MedUni Vienna/Photo Joanna
Ebenstein)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
Hidden beliefs
Yet it was to be a long time before the torch had been passed. “I think this particular way of looking
at the world lingered on longer than we think, and you can see that by looking at old medical
atlases,” says Ebenstein. “Up until the early 19th Century, you still see memento mori imagery in
books that were ostensibly about bones, or childbirth. To me, that suggests these ideas are still in
circulation – whether scientists believed them, or felt they had to include them just because it’s the
way people need it explained in order to understand, I don’t know.” At that time, she argues,
medical imagery as we now understand it was not just a diagrammatic understanding. “It was also
about man’s place in nature, about the nature of life and death, and about God. I feel that this idea
we have now about ‘proper’ anatomical imagery, which should be devoid of extraneous detail, it
shouldn’t have beautiful hair or a beautiful face – it should be as neutral and diagrammatic as
possible – didn’t really come into being until Gray’s Anatomy in 1858. That changed how we start
thinking about the correct ways to depict the dead body – it shifted in a big way.” Our own
‘objective’ scientific viewpoint remains as filtered as the beliefs of the 18th-Century Florentines. “I
think we’re still within that world. That’s now our style, and it looks invisible to us, but I expect in
100 years’ time people will look at it and think that it says something culturally about who we are
now.” This dissectable Venus was created by the workshop of Rudolph Pohl, Dresden, Germany,
circa 1930. (Credit: Münchner Stadtmuseum, Sammlumg Puppentheater/Schaustellerei, Munich)

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
Bodily function
By overcoming our initial reactions to figures like the Spitzner Anatomical Venus (shown here in a
different stage of dissection), Ebenstein believes we can learn more about our own hidden cultural
beliefs. “The Venus has many interpretations – some people find her deeply offensive or horrible –
but there are ways to have a more nuanced understanding. I would be pleased if people came
away saying ‘oh I thought this was disgusting, but now I understand that my feeling of disgust is
more about who we are today than about the intention of the makers at the time.’” And the Venus
embodies an approach that Ebenstein thinks we could benefit from now: “a multi-disciplinary
attitude, in which aesthetics and artistic expression and truth in a scientific way could all work
together to draw in and engage an audience, and make them want to learn”. Because, as she
says, “we all have bodies, and we all think about them and we’re all afraid of them and intrigued by
them”. (Credit: Université de Montpellier anatomical collection/Photo Marc Dantan/Courtesy of
Thames & Hudson Ltd)
Share this article:






http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
Related Stories
The ghoulish riddle of the skull
mask
The haunting image of a ‘sea
cemetery’
The shocking kiss that's gone
viral
More amazing Culture stories
http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
The cross-dressing gents of
the 1800s
Do musicians get better with
age?


Ten beautiful Brutalist
buildings
Ten TV shows to watch in
June

The ghoulish riddle of the skull
mask
Why racists flock to Angry
Birds
http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
Around the BBC
Future
Future
Why do the British love tea so
much?
The right way to describe
Earth's shape
Capital
Capital
Mothers Ruin, the new daddy
of spirits
Learn how to sleep better.
Permanently
Autos
Autos
Are smartphone car keys
Driving the Jaguar of SUVs
http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]
BBC - Culture - Why these anatomical models are not disgusting
safe?
Explore the BBC
News
Sport
Weather
Shop
Earth
Travel
Capital
Culture
Autos
Future
TV
Radio
CBBC
CBeebies
Food
iWonder
Bitesize
Music
Arts
Make It Digital
Taster
Nature
Local
Terms of Use
About the BBC
Privacy Policy
Cookies
Accessibility Help
Parental Guidance
Contact the BBC
Advertise with us
Ad choices
Copyright © 2016 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external
linking.
http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20160526-why-these-anatomical-models-are-not-disgusting[08.06.2016 12:23:47]