Cellular regulation of blood coagulation: a model for

From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS
Cellular regulation of blood coagulation: a model for venous stasis
James E. Campbell, Kathleen E. Brummel-Ziedins, Saulius Butenas, and Kenneth G. Mann
Department of Biochemistry, University of Vermont, Colchester
We have adapted the corn-trypsin inhibitor
whole-blood model to include EA.hy926 as
an endothelium surrogate to evaluate the
vascular modulation of blood coagulation
initiated by relipidated recombinant tissue
factor (rTf) and a cellular Tf surrogate,
lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated THP1
cells (LPS-THP-1). Compared with bare
tubes, EA.hy926 with rTf decreased the rate
of thrombin formation, ITS accumulation,
and the production of fibrinopeptide A.
These phenomena occurred with increased
rates of factor Va (fVa) inactivation by cleavages at R506 and R306. Thus, EA.hy926 provides thrombin-dependent protein C activation and APC fVa inactivation. Comparisons
of rTf with LPS-THP-1 showed that the latter
gave reduced rates for TAT formation but
equivalent fibrinopeptide A, and fV activation/inactivation. In the presence of
EA.hy926, the reverse was obtained; with
the surrogate endothelium and LPS-THP-1
the rates of TAT generation, fibrinopeptide
release, and fV activation were almost
doubled, whereas cleavage at R306 was
equivalent. These observations suggest cooperativity between the 2 cell surrogates.
These data suggest that the use of these 2
cell lines provides a reproducible quasiendothelial quasi-inflammatory cytokinestimulated monocyte system that provides
a method to evaluate the variations in blood
phenotype against the background of stable
inflammatory cell activator and a stable vascular endothelial surrogate.(Blood. 2010;
116(26):6082-6091)
Introduction
Virchow postulated 3 phenomena that lead to venous thrombosis:
(1) the components contained within the blood itself lead to
systemic hypercoagulability; (2) alteration of the endothelium from
injury or dysfunction; and (3) alterations of blood flow.1 These
postulates are the foundation for the physiologic understanding of
blood coagulation and the maintenance of the hemostatic balance
in the venous circulation.
The maintenance of blood fluidity and vascular integrity is
actively maintained by collaborations between the vascular wall
and the procoagulant and anticoagulant functions in blood. Cellbound and soluble constituents cooperate to maintain this quasiequilibrium fluid state. Upon vascular perforation, multiple interactions initiate a local coagulant response, promoting platelet adhesion/
aggregation, the generation of membrane-bound catalysts, thrombin
generation, and fibrin deposition that overcome local anticoagulants. These processes arrest blood loss with dimensions relevant to
the injury. Subsequently, fibrinolysis and cellular proliferation
repair2 the injured tissue.
The coagulation processes have been studied in vitro using
anticoagulated phlebotomy blood,3 derived plasma,4,5 isolated
component systems,6-8 and numerical simulations.9,10 We have
used corn-trypsin inhibitor (CTI) stabilized whole blood to
study the tissue factor (Tf)–initiated process in the absence of
chelating anticoagulants.11,12 Several hundred of these experiments have been performed to characterize the temporal dynamics of various blood clotting reactions in healthy persons,
congenital abnormalities, and pharmacologic interventions.11-14
In the “normal” population, extreme phenotypic variations (⬎ 5-fold) in Tf-initiated thrombin generation have
been observed.15
To evaluate the contributions of the vascular wall to the blood
coagulation process, studies have used excised blood vessels16-18
and isolated cells.19-21 Badimon22 used human phlebotomy blood in
a flow chamber with denuded swine vessels. Although this model is
more physiologic in nature, these vessels may vary in protein
expression between donor animals and are also complicated by
xeno-protein associations.23 We and others have used isolated
human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs),19 human umbilical artery endothelium,20 and human cerebral microvascular endothelium.21 All these cells display altered behavior and phenotype
when removed from their natural environment,24 depending upon
basement membrane composition,25,26 and show altered protein
expression with passage.27 Consequently, thrombomodulin (TM)
and von Willebrand factor (VWF) have been shown to vary
considerably in isolated HUVECs.28 To address this variability,
investigators have used EA.hy926 cells, an immortalized cell line
produced by hybridization of HUVECs with lung carcinoma cell
A549, to produce cells that display consistent endothelial cell
markers over prolonged passages.29,30 EA.hy926 cells are reported
to “maintain identical characteristic during at least 100 passages”
and express many endothelial proteins.31 EA.hy926 is the most
studied and characterized permanent human vascular endothelial
cell line.32 Based on these reports, we have evaluated EA.hy926 as
a surrogate “endothelium” to explore how the blood coagulation
system is modulated by a confluent cellular provider of vascular
regulatory elements.
The sources, expression, and regulation of natural Tf by cells
and their influence upon blood coagulation processes have been
controversial.33-37 Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated monocytes that express Tf,38,39 have been used.40,41 However, Tf
Submitted January 22, 2010; accepted September 12, 2010. Prepublished
online as Blood First Edition paper, September 23, 2010; DOI 10.1182/blood2010-01-266395.
payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby
marked ‘‘advertisement’’ in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
© 2010 by The American Society of Hematology
6082
BLOOD, 23 DECEMBER 2010 䡠 VOLUME 116, NUMBER 26
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 23 DECEMBER 2010 䡠 VOLUME 116, NUMBER 26
expression on natural monocytes is highly variable.40-42 LPSstimulated THP1 cells appear to potentially provide a stable
surrogate representing an inflammatory peripheral blood cell
source of Tf.
In the present study, we explore the use of EA.hy926 and
LPS-stimulated THP1 cells (LPS-THP-1 cells) as surrogates for
human endothelial cells and cytokine activated monocytes in a
closed system for the simulation of events that might occur during
venous stasis. This approach provides a reproducible model that
incorporates the components of Virchow’s triad necessary for study
of cellular regulation of Tf-initiated coagulation in blood. Furthermore, this approach limits the phenotypic variability in blood
coagulation observed for the normal population to that of the
human donor.15,43
Methods
Materials
Mouse monoclonal anti–human Tf pathway inhibitor (TFPI) antibody
(clone no. AHTFPI-5138), sheep polyclonal anti–human TFPI (no. PAHTFPI-S) and goat anti–human VWF (no. PAHVWF-G) antibodies were gifts
from Dr R. Jenny (Haematologic Technologies Inc). Monoclonal antibody
anti-TM (product no 2375; American Diagnostica). Mouse anti–human
VWF-99, anti–Tf-5, anti–Tf-48, anti–TM-41, anti–fVa-17, and ␣1-Fbg
monoclonal and burro polyclonal monospecific anti–prethrombin 1 antibodies were produced and characterized in house.37,44,45 Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–labeled secondary antibodies were purchased from Southern
Biotechnology Associates. Anti-burro (goat anti–equine HRP, no. 6040-05)
HRP-labeled secondary antibodies were purchased from Southern Biotechnology Associates. Gel electrophoresis standards were from Novagen. The
antibodies used for confocal studies (primary immunoglobulin G antibodies, anti-TM mouse clone [Lab Vision], anti–endothelial cell protein C
receptor [EPCR] goat [R&D Systems], and anti-VWF rabbit clone no.
A0082 [DAKO] and secondary antibodies, donkey anti–rabbit Alexa
Fluor 488 [Invitrogen], donkey anti–goat Alexa Fluor 555 [Invitrogen],
and donkey anti–mouse Alexa Fluor 647 [Invitrogen]) were all gifts
from Dr Edwin G. Bovill (University of Vermont). Western Lightning
Plus ECL (enhanced chemiluminescence substrate; PerkinElmer). Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium with Glutamax, Alexa Fluor 488, and
Alexa Fluor 633 was purchased from Invitrogen. Anti–Tf-5 for confocal
microscopy was bound to R-phycoerythrin via a LNK023RPE kit from
AbD (Serotec). Millipore polyvinylidene difluoride membrane Immobilon-FL, nitrocellulose, VectorShield with 4,6⬘-diamidino-2-phenylindole, gentamicin, soluble human recombinant tumor necrosis factor-␣
(TNF-␣), and all other reagents were purchased from Fisher Scientific.
EA.hy926, the endothelial-like hybridoma cells, were a gift from Dr
C. J. Edgell (University of North Carolina). HUVECs no. HUVEC001F-M, fresh HUVEC basal medium no. HUVEC-002, and HUVEC
stimulatory supplement no. HUVEC-004 were purchased from AllCells.
RPMI 1640 and THP1 monocytic cells were obtained from ATCC.
Recombinant Tf1-243 (rTf), a gift from Dr R. Lundblad and Dr S. L. Liu
(Hyland Division; Baxter Healthcare), was relipidated in 1-palmitoyl-2oleoyl-phosphatidyl serine (PS) and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidylcholine (PC) at 25% PS/75% PC (PCPS).46 PC and PS were purchased from
Avanti Polar Lipids. TFPI was a gift from Dr S. Hardy (Chiron). Goat
anti-mouse HRP-labeled secondary antibody (no. A9917), ␤-mercaptoethanol, benzamidine-HCl, tris-HCl, HEPES, trifluoroacetic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrate (EDTA), and LPS from
Escherichia coli EH100 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. CTI was
prepared in house.11 Fetal bovine serum (FBS premium) was purchased
from Atlanta Biologicals. Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ELISA kits were
from Siemens. U-bottom BD Falcon plates were (BD Labware). EPCR
immunoassay kits were obtained from R&D Systems. Citrated plasma for
clotting assays was produced in house (10 donors).
ENDOTHELIAL MODULATION OF WHOLE-BLOOD CLOTTING
6083
Subjects
Healthy male donors between the ages of 23 years and 35 years (mean
27 years ⫾ 5 years, n ⫽ 5) were recruited and advised according to a
protocol approved by the University of Vermont Human Studies Committee. Written consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of
Helsinki. Subject questionnaires showed no clinical history of coagulopathy nor aspirin or drug use. Repeat blood draws were performed from this
donor population.
EA.hy926 adherence and growth in polystyrene reaction tubes
Polystyrene tubes and polypropylene caps11 were treated with a Harrick
PDC-3XG plasma cleaner (high setting 20 minutes ambient air). Confluent
EA.hy926 cells from two 10-cm diameter culture plates were resuspended
in 100 mL growth medium (Dulbecco modified Eagle medium with
Glutamax, gentamicin, and 10% FBS premium), and distributed in 2-mL
aliquots to the prepared capped polystyrene tubes. Two days growth in a
37°C, 5% CO2 humidified incubator allowed the cells to adequately divide
and adhere to achieve confluence in the bottom half of the horizontal tube
cylinder (verified under bright-field microscopy). Endothelial growth
medium was replaced with growth medium with no FBS at the end of the
second day, and the cells were incubated for an additional 15 hours to attain
quiescence. The “endothelium” lined tubes were used in whole-blood
experiments on the third day after removal of the medium and one wash
with fresh medium. The unilaminar “endothelium” from 5 random tubes
was removed with versene, centrifuged, resuspended in HBS, stained with
trypan blue, and counted (5.2 ⫾ 0.2 ⫻ 105 cells/tube, n ⫽ 5) using a
hemocytometer.
Characterization of EA.hy926 cells
Confluent EA.hy926 cells were labeled with preconjugated anti–VWF-99
Alexa Fluor 488 or primary conjugated anti–TM-41 biotin antibody and
secondary streptavidin 633. Confocal comparative analyses between
EA.hy926 cells and HUVECs for VWF, TM, and EPCR was accomplished
using primary and secondary antibodies provided by Dr Edwin G. Bovill as
well as a modified microscopy protocol from Dr Bovill and Dr Taatjes.47,48
Briefly, cells were grown to confluence on 8 chambered slides according to
cell-type instructions. Cells were rinsed 3 times with 1X Hanks balanced
salt solution (HBS) 20 mM HEPES, 150 mM Nacl and fixed for 5 minutes
with 4% paraformaldehyde (10% formalin) in 1X HBS buffer. Cells were
rinsed 3 times in 1X HBS before blocking with preimmune donkey serum
for 1 hour at room temperature. Primary antibodies TM, EPCR, and VWF
were administered for an overnight incubation at 4°C. Secondary antibodies
were incubated 1 hour at room temperature. A secondary control incubation
including all secondary antibodies in a well containing confluent EA.hy926
and another containing HUVECs showed no immunofluorescence labeling
as previously reported for this system when used for blood vessels.47 All
images were captured with a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal laser scanning
microscope (Zeiss MicroImaging) with a Plan-Apochromat 63⫻/1.4 oilimmersion objective. Excitation was performed using a 405-nm laser diode,
488 argon laser, and 543/633 helium/neon laser, and emissions passed
through LP650, BP420-480, BP505-530, and BP560-615 filters to acquire images in
12-bit multitrack mode.
For Tf activity assessment,49 cells were grown to confluence, stimulated
for 4 hours with LPS (250 ng/mL LPS-THP-1) or treated with versene,
counted, centrifuged (200g for 5 minutes) and resuspended in HBS to a
concentration of 1 ⫻ 106 cells/mL. These cells were added to citrated
plasma containing 0.1 mg/mL CTI and 50 ␮M PCPS. Plasma clotting was
initiated with 25 mM CaCl2. Clotting times were determined using the ST8
clotting instrument (Diagnostica Stago).
For analyses of protein expression, cells were grown to confluence,
released from the plate with versene, counted, centrifuged (200g for
5 minutes) and resuspended/lysed in 1% Triton X–100/PBS, 1 mM EDTA,
10 mM benzamidine hydrochloride, 200 ␮M phenylmethanesulphonylfluoride, 40 ␮M FPRck, 65 kIU aprotinin, 0.5 ␮g/mL leupeptin, and 0.7 ␮g/mL
pepstatin A. The lysates were mixed, centrifuged at 14 000g, and the
supernatants characterized by immunoassays for VWF,45 Tf,37 TM, EPCR,
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
6084
BLOOD, 23 DECEMBER 2010 䡠 VOLUME 116, NUMBER 26
CAMPBELL et al
Figure 1. Fluorescent confocal micrographs of
HUVECs and EA.hy926 hybridoma cells. All images
were obtained at a magnification ⫻400 using a 40X oil
immersion objective under identical settings for focus and
image capture. EPCR (green), VWF (white), TM (red), and
4,6⬘-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; blue) are shown in
split xy along with a merged image (composite) as viewed by
Zeiss LSM 5 image viewer software.
and TFPI. TM was quantitated with anti-TM monoclonal antibody (25 ␮g/mL;
American Diagnostica) coupled beads and probed with biotinylated anti–TM-41
monoclonal antibodies (10 ␮g/mL) via fluorescence Luminex immunoassay
(Luminex Technology).37 Binding was detected with phycoerythrin-streptavidin
(5 ␮g/mL). A nonspecific isotype-matched monoclonal antibody control was
included in the reaction mixture. TFPI was quantitated by a sandwich ELISA
using anti-TFPI monoclonal antibodies (5 ␮g/mL) as the capture antibody and a
sheep anti-human TFPI antibody (10 ␮g/mL) as the probe. Binding was detected
with HRP-rabbit anti-sheep antibody (1:2000). The EPCR assay was conducted
using the R&D Systems protocol.
THP1 cells were treated at a concentration of 2.5 ⫻ 106 cells/mL in
RPMI 1640 with LPS (250 ng/mL, 4 hours).49,50 Cell-surface and total Tf
was quantitated via immunoassay.37 TFPI was quantitated by ELISA.
LPS-THP-1 were titrated into CTI phlebotomy blood with clotting
times determined visually (2 observers by subjective evaluation). The
clotting activity for 2 ⫻ 104 stimulated monocytes/mL was determined to
be equivalent to 5 pM rTf/PCPS activity and used for all THP1 cell–based
Tf experiments.
separately at ⫺80°C for further analysis. Samples were analyzed for TAT by
ELISA.11 Fibrinopeptide A (FPA) using HPLC methodology53 and with
Western blotting for prothrombin, fV, fVa, fVa307-506, and fibrinogen-fibrin
reaction products under either nonreducing or reducing conditions.11,54
Densitometry was performed using the Fujifilm chemiluminescent imager
LAS4000 and Fujifilm MultiGauge imaging software (ver 3.x). Concentrations were determined from serial dilutions of the relevant purified proteins,
the absolute concentration for fV was estimated by normalizing the data
assuming a mean physiologic value of 20 nM.55 Fibrinopeptide data were
normalized from each subject’s control data.
Statistical analyses
All data in the manuscript and figures were expressed as mean (⫾ SEM).
Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software) was used to perform variable slope
curve fitting analyses, linear analyses, and statistical tests: t test, and
ANOVA (repeated measures) with Bonferroni posttest. Differences with
values for P ⬍ .05 were considered statistically significant.
Phlebotomy blood experiments
The contributions of EA.hy926 and LPS-THP-1 cells to blood coagulation
were evaluated by comparing phlebotomy blood 1) in the presence and
absence (bare tubes) of EA.hy926 with 5 pM rTf/PCPS, and 2) in the
presence and absence of EA.hy926 with 2 ⫻ 104 LPS-THP-1 cells as a
source of Tf. Donor blood (1 mL) was delivered into tubes containing CTI
(100 ␮g/mL) and a source of Tf as previously described.11 After LPS
prestimulation, THP1 cells were added after 1 rinse in HBS, recentrifugation (200g for 5 minutes) and resuspension in HBS (5 ⫻ 106 THP1
cells/mL) in 4-␮L aliquots (2 ⫻ 104 per aliquot). Tubes (37°C) were rocked
(16 cycles per minute) and quenched at various time points over the course
of 20 minutes with a cocktail of inhibitors: HBS (1 mL total) containing
50 mM EDTA, 20 mM benzamidine-HCl, and 50 ␮M FPRck. The zero
time point contained the inhibitors before the addition of blood. Clot time
was established visually by observation of a thickening of the blood in
rocked tubes illustrated by a change in the edge of the fluid cycling back and
forth from concave to convex. This methods accuracy is best judged by
examination of the interception of the “initiation” and “propagation” phases
of the reactions (see Figures 2-6) that, in general, correspond to the clot
times shown for the present experiments and for the previous more than 400
whole-blood experiments done in this laboratory.6,11-14 A control tube with
no Tf was used for each experiment. Controls with no EA.hy926 cells
clotted over 20 minutes and with EA.hy926 cells clotted over 17 minutes.
The “initiation” and “propagation” phases have been defined and used
by this laboratory since approximately 19946 to describe synthetic coagulation proteome and whole-blood experiments in multiple reports11-14 and
reviews.51,52 The “initiation” phase corresponds to the initial time course of
TAT accumulation (⬃ 2 nM) in which the membrane catalyst elements are
formed and assembled. The “propagation” phase corresponds to the major
thrombin generation/TAT accumulation (⬃ 500 nM-800 nM).
Analyses of whole-blood samples
The quenched samples were centrifuged (15 minutes at 1160g) to separate
the clot material from the solution phase. These phases were stored
Results
EA.hy926 cells
Confocal microscopy showed the presence of TM, EPCR, and
VWF on EA.hy926 cells and HUVECs (Figure 1). Tf was not
detectable after LPS stimulation (250 ng/mL, 4 hours) either by
immunoassay at a concentration of 2.5 ⫻ 105 cells/mL or by
activity at 1 ⫻ 106 cells/mL (⬍ 10 fM).35,49 Following TNF-␣
stimulation (10 ng/mL, 4 hours), Tf expression above background
was observed via immunoassay but at concentrations below the
quantitation limit (0.49 pM per 5 ⫻ 105 EA.hy926 cells/mL). The
molar concentrations of EA.hy926 expressed TM, VWF, EPCR,
and TFPI were determined by immunoassay. These results (Table
1) are similar to those previously published for HUVECs.56-58
The Tf issue on endothelial cells is controversial. Several recent
reviews59-61 document the current understanding of Tf including
cell types and anatomical locations. Tf has been reported by several
studies to be present on endothelium in vitro,62-65 yet conclusive
proof of endothelium Tf synthesis is lacking.66-68 A study of
TNF-␣–activated HUVECs69 suggests 1 fM/cm2 or a 20 pM concentration (Table 1).
Recombinant Tf with EA.hy926 cells
When blood (5 donors) was treated with 5 pM rTf/PCPS in the
presence and absence of EA.hy926, the clot time did not vary
significantly (2.9 ⫾ 0.14 minutes vs 3.0 ⫾ 0.17 minutes, P ⫽ .71).
Thrombin generation (TAT formation) in response to 5 pM rTf/
PCPS stimulus with or without EA.hy926 is shown in Figure 2A as
the mean of 5 experiments (⫾ SEM). Consistent with the visually
observed clot time (Figure 2A arrows), the initiation phase of
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 23 DECEMBER 2010 䡠 VOLUME 116, NUMBER 26
ENDOTHELIAL MODULATION OF WHOLE-BLOOD CLOTTING
6085
Table 1. Characterization of EA.hy926 cell and HUVEC types
EA.hy926 cells
Protein
Molecules/cell
HUVECs
Molar concentration for 5 ⴛ 105
cells/mL solution, M
10⫺10
VWF
2.5 ⫻
TM
8.7 ⫻ 104
7.3 ⫻ 10⫺11
EPCR
3.9 ⫻ 105
TFPI
2.6 ⫻ 105
LPS-induced Tf
TNF␣-induced Tf
105
2.0 ⫻
Molecules/cell
2.6 ⫻
105
Molar concentration for 5 ⴛ 105
cells/mL solution, M
2.2 ⫻
10⫺10
Reference*
58
5 ⫻ 104, 1 ⫻ 105
4.2 ⫻ 10⫺11, 8.3 ⫻ 10⫺11
56, 85
3.2 ⫻ 10⫺10
7 ⫻ 105
5.8 ⫻ 10⫺10
85
2.2 ⫻ 10⫺10
7.8 ⫻ 104
6.5 ⫻ 10⫺11
57
ND
ND
5.0 ⫻ 103
4 ⫻ 10⫺12
68
⬍6.0 ⫻ 102
⬍4.9 ⫻ 10⫺13
2.5 ⫻ 104
2.0 ⫻ 10⫺11
69
Data are expressed in concentrations based on 5 ⫻105 EA.hy926 cells/mL present in the whole-blood model. EA.hy926 cells were stimulated with 250 ng/mL LPS for
4 hours or 10 ng/mL TNF-␣ for 4 hours in attempts to elicit expression of Tf. All other values reflect nonstimulated conditions and total expression.
*Reference data for HUVECs only.
ND indicates not detected.
thrombin generation (⬃ 2 nM thrombin) is not changed by
EA.hy926. Thus the contribution of EA.hy926 TFPI (Table 1) was
negligible, as would be anticipated from previous studies.54 In
addition, computer modeling9,10,70 predicted only a 16-second
increase in the initiation phase duration (data not shown). In
contrast, EA.hy926 shortens the duration of the propagation phase
(8.9 minutes to 5.2 minutes), decreases the maximum rate of
thrombin generation (60 ⫾ 5.5 nM/min to 34 ⫾ 6.6 nM/min,
P ⫽ .019), and produces less total thrombin (512 ⫾ 28 nM to
203 ⫾ 12 nM, P ⬍ .001). The decrease in the rate of thrombin
generation during the propagation phase in the presence of
EA.hy926 is similar to that previously observed for the purified
proteome with soluble TM7 and for HUVEC19 with products
corresponding to R507-709 and R307-506,71 which most likely are
attributed to the generation of activated protein C (APC) by
thrombin with EA.hy926 TM and EPCR (Figure 1).72
Figure 2B illustrates the normalized FPA generation with rTf in
bare tubes compared with EA.hy926. The initial rates of FPA
Figure 2. rTf-activated CTI-inhibited blood with or without EA.hy926 cells. Bare tubes (f) and tubes containing a unilaminar layer of EA.hy926 (E) were used to measure
(A) TAT formation over time after CTI-inhibited fresh blood activation with 5 pM rTf, (B) FPA production, (C) normalized fibrinogen consumption with a representative Western
blot of a single subject and (D) fVa generation (left) and inactivation (right) as quantified by densitometry of Western blot analysis using ␣-fV no. 17 HC antibody showing fVa HC
and fVa307-506 HC cleavage product (bottom). FVa1-506 HC cleavage is also shown but was not quantified. Clot times in all experiments are indicated (f ⫽ 3.0 ⫾ 0.17 minutes
and E ⫽ 2.9 ⫾ 0.14 minutes). Dashed line in a and b represents 95% confidence limits.
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
6086
CAMPBELL et al
Figure 3. Clotting of CTI-inhibited fresh blood triggered with LPS-THP-1.
CTI-inhibited whole blood was triggered to clot by varying concentrations of
LPS-THP-1 (Œ, n ⫽ 5 blood donors). A total of 2 ⫻ 104 LPS-THP-1 cells/mL are
shown to have equivalent clotting activity to the 5pM rTf). Clot time represented by the
horizontal dashed line (n ⫽ 5). An experiment using another population of titrated
LPS-THP-1 cells illustrates a very similar titration curve indicating reproducibility of
LPS-THP-1 activity (open gray box, n ⫽ 1 donor). A total of 5 ⫻ 104 nonstimulated
THP1 cells/mL (f, n ⫽ 5 donor) is equivalent in clotting activity to 2.5 ⫻ 103
stimulated THP1 cells/mL. Nonstimulated THP1 cells show 5% of stimulated
THP1 activity.
generation in both circumstances are similar (5.1 ⫾ 1.3 ␮M/min vs
4.2 ⫾ 0.9 ␮M/min); however, the ultimate relative FPA release is
somewhat reduced in the presence of the endothelial cell surrogate,
consistent with the earlier termination of thrombin generation
(Figure 2A). As observed in Figure 2C and in earlier studies,12 at
clot time, virtually all fibrinogen products are removed from the
fluid phase of the blood indicating that the initial clot is a
heterogeneous mixture of fibrin 1, fibrin 2, and fibrinogen because
at clot time only 30% to 40% of total FPA is released (Figure 2B).53
Western blot analyses for prothrombin consumption with rTf
with and without EA.hy926 after 5 pM rTf/PCPS stimulation
showed that in the absence of EA.hy926 the rate of prothrombin
consumption is greater (⫺0.07 ⫾ 0.01 ␮M/min) compared with
the reaction with EA.hy926 (0.00 ⫾ 0.02 ␮M/min, P ⫽ .003; linear analysis) from time points 6 to 20 minutes. A 20-minute time
point comparison shows a greater remaining prothrombin concentration of 1.12 ⫾ 0.17␮M in the presence of EA.hy926 versus
0.25 ⫾ 0.07␮M (P ⫽ .002) without EA.hy926 (data not shown).
Western blot analyses of the fV activation/inactivation process
in 5 pM rTf/PCPS initiated reactions in the presence and absence of
EA.hy926 are shown in Figure 2D. In both cases, fVa heavy chain
(HC) is observed by 1 minute. Densitometric analyses (n ⫽ 5)
shows that although the initial rate of fV activation is not different
(with or without EA.hy926 cells, 4.7 ⫾ 0.7 nM/min vs
4.5 ⫾ 1.4 nM/min; Figure 2d). With EA.hy926, a 2-fold decrease
in the maximum level of fVa HC is observed (20 vs 10 nM,
P ⬍ .001). As expected,71 inactivation of fVa via the R506 cleavage
occurs more rapidly in the presence of EA.hy926 (5.2 ⫾ 0.8 minutes vs 7.6 ⫾ 0.9 minutes) and the initial rate of the fVa R307-506
cleavage product formation is accelerated (2.9 ⫾ 0.44 nM/min vs
0.57 ⫾ 0.13 nM/min; P ⬍ .001). With EA.hy926, the 30-kDa fVai
fragment, fVa307-506 is seen earlier (4.0 ⫾ 0.7 minutes vs
9.2 ⫾ 0.8 minutes) consistent with the functional contribution of
the EA.hy926 provided TM and EPCR (Table 1)71-73 to the APC
R306, R506 cleavages.
Recombinant Tf versus LPS-THP-1 in bare tubes
Figure 3 shows clot times for 2 titrations (from 644 to 3.3 ⫻ 105
cells/mL and from 250 to 2.0 ⫻ 104 cells/mL) of LPS-THP-1 (LPS
stimulated at 250 ng/mL, 4 hours) into CTI-inhibited blood. These
BLOOD, 23 DECEMBER 2010 䡠 VOLUME 116, NUMBER 26
experiments demonstrate the reproducibility of LPS-induced Tf
activity by THP1 cells. LPS-THP-1 (2 ⫻ 104 cells/mL) yield
equivalent clotting times (3.1 ⫾ 0.1 minutes) to that of 5 pM
rTf/PCPS (Figure 3 dashed line). The concentration of surface Tf
antigen per 2 ⫻ 104 LPS-THP-1 cells/mL was found to be 250 fM;
a value similar to that previously reported.37
LPS-THP-1 (2 ⫻ 104 cells/mL) and 5 pM rTf/PCPS with CTI
blood in the absence of EA.hy926 showed no difference in clot
time (3.0 ⫾ 0.34 minutes vs 3.0 ⫾ 0.17 minutes, P ⫽ 1.0). Although both Tf sources yield similar visual clotting times (Figure
4A arrow) and initiation phase durations (Figure 4A), the TAT
accumulation profiles show some variation. The maximum rate of
thrombin generation is decreased by 2.3-fold when LPS-THP-1
cells are substituted for rTf (60 ⫾ 5.5 nM/min to 26 ⫾ 2.8 nM/
min, P ⬍ .001). Furthermore, although the maximum concentration of TAT at 20 minutes is not significantly different in LPS-THP1–activated blood, TAT generation had not achieved a plateau value
at the termination of the experiment. The rTf stimulated prothrombin consumption (time points 6-20 minutes; Figure 4B) occurs at a
faster rate (⫺0.07 ⫾ 0.01 ␮M/min) than with LPS-THP-1
(⫺0.03 ⫾ 0.01 ␮M/min, P ⫽ .016). Normalized FPA generation in
blood activated with either Tf source is similar (Figure 4C).
The rate of fV activation was equivalent with either 5 pM
rTf/PCPS and LPS-THP-1 (4.7 ⫾ 0.7 nM/min, 4.3 ⫾ 0.6 nM/min,
P ⫽ .70; Figure 4D). However, with rTf/PCPS, the formation of
fVa307-506 was slightly accelerated relative to LPS-THP-1
(0.57 ⫾ 0.13 nM/min vs 0.39 ⫾ 0.06 nM/min, P ⬍ .001) possibly
because of the influence of the added PCPS in the former because
cleavage at R306 is PCPS dependent.74
EA.hy926 with LPS-THP-1 or rTf
In the presence of EA.hy926, LPS-THP-1 blood clotted slightly
more rapidly than rTf activated blood (2.3 ⫾ 0.10 minutes vs
2.9 ⫾ 0.14 minutes, P ⫽ .01).
In the presence of EA.hy926, blood activated with LPS-THP-1
(2 ⫻ 104 cells/mL) shows a trend toward an accelerated rate of TAT
accumulation (63 ⫾ 15 nM/min) compared with 5 pM rTf/PCPS
(34 ⫾ 6.6 nM/min, P ⫽ .047; Figure 5A). The maximum thrombin
accumulated is also slightly greater for the LPS-THP-1 reactions
compared with rTf/PCPS reactions (281 ⫾ 52 nM vs 203 ⫾ 12 nM,
respectively). In contrast, compared with bare tubes (Figure 4A),
the presence of EA.hy926 (Figure 5A) with LPS-THP-1 increased
the maximum rate of TAT generation from 26 ⫾ 2.8 nM/min to
63 ⫾ 15 nM/min, P ⫽ .008) and shortens the duration of the
propagation phase (⬎ 17 to ⬃ 7 minutes). With EA.hy926, TAT
formation is unchanged from time points 7 to 20 minutes (Figure
5A), whereas a slower continued TAT generation occurred without
EA.hy926 (rate, 26 ⫾ 2.8 nM/min, P ⬍ .001; Figure 4A). In the
absence of EA.hy926, slower thrombin generation continued
beyond 15 minutes such that at the 20-minute point, TAT concentrations are not statistically different (without EA.hy926, 439 ⫾ 87 nM;
with EA.hy926, 281 ⫾ 52 nM, P ⫽ .26; Figure 4A).
In the presence of EA.hy926, with rTf or LPS-THP-1 activation, the rates of prothrombin consumption are not significantly
different but the trend to faster consumption is in favor of
LPS-THP-1 (Figure 5B).
The rate of FPA generation was accelerated in the presence of
EA.hy926 when blood was activated with LPS-THP-1 compared
with rTf (Figure 5C). An increased rate of FPA release
(9.3 ⫾ 0.9 ␮M/min vs 4.2 ⫾ 0.9 ␮M/min, P ⫽ .001) with an earlier point for FPA detection (2 vs 3 minutes) was evident consistent
with the accelerated clot time observed for the EA.hy926 system
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 23 DECEMBER 2010 䡠 VOLUME 116, NUMBER 26
ENDOTHELIAL MODULATION OF WHOLE-BLOOD CLOTTING
6087
Figure 4. CTI-inhibited fresh blood activated with rTf or LPS-THP-1 in the absence of EA.hy926. Bare tubes containing rTf (f) or LPS-THP-1 (⽧) activated whole blood
was used to measure (A) TAT formation over time, (B) prothrombin consumption, (C) FPA production, and (D) fVa generation (left), inactivation (right), and representative
Western blot. FVa1-506 HC cleavage is also shown but was not quantified. Clot times in all experiments are indicated (f ⫽ 3.0 ⫾ 0.17 minutes and ⽧ ⫽ 3.0 ⫾ 0.34 minutes).
Dashed line in panels A and C represents 95% confidence limits.
after LPS-THP-1 activation. In bare tubes, both Tf sources produced
FPA to the same ultimate level at similar rates (Figure 4C).
Densitometric analyses of fibrinogen-fibrin blots, in the presence or
absence of EA.hy926, showed no significant difference in the rate of
fibrinogen removal as expected from the similar clot times with THP1
activation in the presence of EA.hy926 (data not shown).
In the presence of EA.hy926, activation with either Tf source
did not significantly alter the maximum rates of fVa generation
(rTf/PCPS, 4.5 ⫾ 1.4 nM/min; LPS-THP-1, 6.4 ⫾ 0.6 nM/min,
P ⫽ .18); however, a lag was seen with rTf (Figure 5D). Under
the experimental conditions used, the initial inactivation of fVa
(R506) associated with rTf/PCPS stimulation with EA.hy926
allowed only 3 time points, limiting the power of the analysis. In
the presence of EA.hy926, 5 pM rTf/PCPS caused slightly
accelerated formation of fVai307-506 over the LPS-THP-1–
activated process (rTf/PCPS, 2.9 ⫾ 0.44 nM/min; LPS-THP-1,
2.1 ⫾ 0.32 nM/min, P ⫽ .019) suggesting more efficient APC
function, probably as a consequence of the PCPS effect on APC
cleavage at R306.74
When compared with bare tubes (Figure 4D), the contribution
of LPS-THP-1 on fV activation and inactivation in the presence of
EA.hy926 (Figure 5D) showed both an accelerated rate of activation (6.4 ⫾ 0.6 nM/min vs 4.3 ⫾ 0.6 nM/min, P ⫽ .035) and initial
inactivation (2.1 ⫾ 0.32 nM/min vs 0.39 ⫾ 0.06 nM/min). The
maximum concentrations of fVa formed differed slightly (with
EA.hy926, 18.3 nM vs without EA.hy926, 20 nM), whereas the
peak concentration occurred earlier with EA.hy926 (3 minutes vs
8 minutes, respectively). The faster rate of fVai307-506 formation
with LPS-THP-1 activation with EA.hy926 compared with the
same Tf source in bare tubes (2.1 ⫾ 0.32 nM/min vs
0.39 ⫾ 0.06 nM/min, P ⬍ .001) is illustrated by comparison of
Figures 5D and 4D.
Table 2 summarizes the results of experiments with the 2 Tf
sources with and without EA.hy926. The following differences
stand out with respect to the combination of LPS-THP-1 in the
presence of EA.hy926: 1) clot time is shorter, 2) the delayed rate of
TAT generation observed with LPS-THP-1 in bare tubes is
recovered to a rate equivalent to rTf in bare tubes, and 3) rTf gave a
slower TAT generation rate with the endothelial cell surrogate. The
ultimate accumulated level of thrombin induced by both Tf sources
is reduced with the endothelial cell surrogate. The combination of
monocyte and endothelial surrogates increases the rate of fV
activation. The rate of fVa inactivation is accelerated with EA.hy926
with both Tf sources compared with bare tubes. A dramatic increase
in the release of FPA is observed with a combination of LPS-THP-1
and EA.hy926 compared with all systems.
Reproducibility of the surrogate cell system
A primary objective of the present study was to develop reproducible endothelial and inflammatory monocyte surrogates to evaluate
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
6088
BLOOD, 23 DECEMBER 2010 䡠 VOLUME 116, NUMBER 26
CAMPBELL et al
Figure 5. CTI-inhibited fresh blood activated with rTf or LPS-THP-1 in the presence EA.hy926. Tubes containing a unilaminar layer of EA.hy926 with rTf (E) or
LPS-THP-1 (‚) activated whole blood were used to measure (A) TAT formation, (B) prothrombin consumption, (C) FPA production, and (D) fVa generation (left), inactivation
(right), and representative Western blot. FVa1-506 HC cleavage is shown but not quantified. Clot times in all experiments are indicated (‚ ⫽ 2.3 ⫾ 0.10 minutes and
E ⫽ 2.9 ⫾ 0.14 minutes). Dashed line in a and c represents 95% confidence limits.
the individual phenotypic variations in blood composition and
response to a Tf stimulus mimicking venous stasis with an
activated inflammatory cell. To ensure that these data in the cohort
study represented by the mean product formation over time are
reproducible and would not mask the observations for a specific
subject within the cohort, we compared data for 2 studies conducted 8 days apart for a single individual’s blood evaluated using
the monocyte/endothelial surrogate environment. Previous studies15,43 have shown that most individuals’ blood is highly reproducible with respect to Tf stimulation in bare tubes. These data
presented in Figure 6 illustrate that this is also true for a single
subject when blood in contact with a surrogate endothelial cell
layer is confronted with the surrogate monocyte Tf presentation.
Presented are data for the 2 experiments conducted 8 days apart for
generation of TAT, FPA, fVa HC, and the fVai APC degradation
product 307-506. These data obtained for the single subject are
reproducible over time and the surrogate inflammatory cell activator and vascular bed are representative of the population study
presented in Figure 5.
Discussion
Our data demonstrate that (1) the EA.hy926 cell line provides a
stable endothelial cell surrogate presenting a complement of known
Table 2. Summary of experimental results for 2 Tf sources with and without EA.hy926 cells
Clot time,
min
TAT
Rate,
nM/min
TAT
maximum,
nM
FVa rate,
nM/min
FVa307-506 rate, nM/min
FPA rate,
␮M/min
rTf
3.0 ⫾ 0.17
60 ⫾ 5.5
512 ⫾ 28
4.7 ⫾ 0.7
0.57 ⫾ 0.13
5.1 ⫾ 1.3
LPS-THP-1
3.0 ⫾ 0.34
26 ⫾ 2.8
439 ⫾ 87
4.3 ⫾ 0.6
0.39 ⫾ 0.06
4.2 ⫾ 0.25
Tf source without EA.hy926
Tf Source with EA.hy926
rTf
2.9 ⫾ 0.14
34 ⫾ 6.6
203 ⫾ 12
4.5 ⫾ 1.4
2.9 ⫾ 0.44
4.2 ⫾ 0.9
LPS-THP-1
2.3 ⫾ 0.1
63 ⫾ 15
281 ⫾ 52
6.4 ⫾ 0.6
2.1 ⫾ 0.32
9.3 ⫾ 0.9
Rates are shown (⫾ SEM).
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 23 DECEMBER 2010 䡠 VOLUME 116, NUMBER 26
ENDOTHELIAL MODULATION OF WHOLE-BLOOD CLOTTING
6089
Figure 6. Surrogate cell reproducibility. Data represent replicate of experiments for a single subject with EA.hy926 and
LPS-THP-1 conducted on 2 occasions (Œ, ‚) with an 8-day
interval between experiments. These data illustrate the reproducibility of (A) TAT formation, (B) FPA formation, (C) fV activation,
and (D) fVa inactivation in these duplicate experiments. These
data show the reproducibility of the method with respect to the
use of the 2 surrogates and also show these observations for the
single subject are representative of those for the cohort.
coagulation-related endothelial cell surface proteins, which produces consistent anticoagulant responses suggestive of a functioning endothelium with Tf-activated phlebotomy blood; (2) LPSTHP-1 can function as a reproducible surrogate for a stimulated
circulating cell source of Tf; (3) EA.hy926 and LPS-THP-1
provide a reasonable surrogate for venous stasis coupled with a
blood derived inflammatory stimulus; and (4) there appears to be a
cooperative cell-cell effect between EA.hy926 and an LPS-THP-1,
not seen when rTf/PCPS is used as the activator.
The activation of blood by rTf/PCPS versus LPS-THP-1
produces very different coagulation profiles with EA.hy926 including: faster and greater thrombin formation, increased fVa generation, and increased rate of FPA release. Complete fVa inactivation
(fVai307-506 generation) is faster in the presence of EA.hy926
regardless of the Tf source illustrating the presence of a functional
TM-EPCR protein C activation system.19,72 In contrast, in the
absence of EA.hy926, blood clotting times with both Tf sources are
similar as are FPA release and fV activation and inactivation,
although thrombin is generated at a slower rate during the
propagation phase with LPS-THP-1.
EA.hy926 and LPS-THP-1 correspond to reproducible surrogates for the known procoagulant and anticoagulant functions
displayed by endothelial cells presenting similar concentrations of
VWF, TM, EPCR, and TFPI. The principle reason for using these
cells as surrogates for the respective natural cells is because of the
variability of the cells from natural sources,75-81 which in combination with the high variability of human donor blood would lead to
uninterpretable data. The reproducibility problem for endothelial
cells from various natural sources and from passage to passage is
well documented. EA.hy926 appears to provide endothelial cell–
like function with respect to APC anticoagulation.
LPS stimulation of monocytes has been reported to elicit the
secretion of TNF-␣ and interleukin-1, which may modify the
function of endothelium.82 Furthermore, simultaneous thrombin
and LPS stimulation of monocytes increases the release of TNF-␣
and interleukin-1␤.82 In the present study, we observe that although
EA.hy926 Tf expression is not detectable via LPS administration,
the significant differences observed for LPS-THP-1 with or without
EA.hy926 suggest a cooperative process between the surrogate
inflammatory cell and the surrogate endothelium. However, TNF␣–induced expression of Tf is an unlikely mechanism because Tf
surface expression occurring 3 minutes after stimulation could
not occur via de novo synthesis and Tf is not stored within the
cell. The increase in EA.hy926–LPS-THP-1 procoagulant activity potentially may provide in vitro experimental access to the
relationship between sepsis, inflammation, and coagulation.
These data suggest that stimulated monocytes may directly
activate or intensify the endothelial inflammatory phenotype
and contribute to vascular thrombosis.
A finding replicated in the present study related to whole-blood
activation by Tf is the absence of quantitative conversion of
prothrombin to thrombin. In addition, a significant fraction of
thrombin B chain escapes covalent association with antithrombin.
The laboratory of Dr Hemker83 identified that a significant fraction
of thrombin is bound to ␣2-macroglobulin, and our studies suggest
accumulation of the thrombin ␣1-antitrypsin complex.84 Furthermore, significant destructive prothrombin cleavage by thrombin
leads to production of prothrombin fragment 1 and prethrombin 1.
The use of these 2 transformed cell lines provides a reproducible method to evaluate the variations in blood phenotype against
the background of stable blood cell activator and vascular endothelial surrogates. The EA.hy926–LPS-THP-1 system thus provides a
useful method for characterizing the biochemical dynamics of how
an individual’s blood would respond to an inflammatory cell
presented Tf under conditions of venous stasis.
Acknowledgments
We thank Matthew Whelihan and Daniel LaJoie for technical
assistance and Dr Thomas Orfeo for intellectual input. We thank
Jolanta Amblo for technical assistance and expertise in immunochemical assays and Dr Jeffrey Spees and Marilyn Wadsworth for
assistance with confocal microscopy. Special thanks to Winifred
Trotman for expertise in fluorescent confocal microscopy image
capture for comparative analysis of EA.hy926 cells and HUVECs
and to Dr Beth Bouchard for use of laboratory equipment and
intellectual input.
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
6090
BLOOD, 23 DECEMBER 2010 䡠 VOLUME 116, NUMBER 26
CAMPBELL et al
This study was supported by grants P01 HL46703 and T32
HL07594 by the National Institutes of Health.
Authorship
Contribution: J.E.C. designed and performed research, analyzed
data, and contributed to the writing of the paper; K.E.B.-Z.
designed research, analyzed data, and contributed to the writing of
the paper; S.B. performed research and contributed to the writing of
the paper; and K.G.M. contributed to experimental design, analytical tools, data analyses, and the writing of the paper.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: K.G.M. is Chairman of the
Board of Haematologic Technologies. The remaining authors
declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Kenneth G. Mann, PhD, Department of Biochemistry, Colchester Research Facility Rm 235, University of
Vermont, Colchester, VT 05446; e-mail: [email protected].
References
1. Virchow R. Thrombose und Embolie. Gefassentzundung und septische Infektion. Gesammelte
Abhandlungen zur wissenschlaflichen Medicin,
Frankfurk am Main: Von Meidinger & Sohn. 1856:
219-732 [Trans: Matzdorff AC, Bell WR. Canton,
Massachusetts: Science History Publications;
1998].
2. Naldini A, Carney DH, Pucci A, Pasquali A,
Carraro F. Thrombin regulates the expression of
proangiogenic cytokines via proteolytic activation
of protease-activated receptor-1. Gen Pharmacol.
2000;35(5):255-259.
3. Chavez JJ, Foley DE, Snider CC, et al. A novel
thrombelastograph tissue factor/kaolin assay of
activated clotting times for monitoring heparin
anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Anesth Analg. 2004;99(5):1290-1294; table of
contents.
4. Beguin S, Lindhout T, Hemker HC. The effect of
trace amounts of tissue factor on thrombin generation in platelet rich plasma, its inhibition by
heparin. Thromb Haemost. 1989;61(1):25-29.
5. Hron G, Kollars M, Binder BR, Eichinger S, Kyrle
PA. Identification of patients at low risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism by measuring
thrombin generation. JAMA. 2006;296(4):
397-402.
6. Lawson JH, Kalafatis M, Stram S, Mann KG. A
model for the tissue factor pathway to thrombin. I.
An empirical study. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(37):
23357-23366.
7. van’t Veer C, Golden NJ, Kalafatis M, Mann KG.
Inhibitory mechanism of the protein C pathway on
tissue factor-induced thrombin generation. Synergistic effect in combination with tissue factor pathway inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(12):
7983-7994.
8. Butenas S, van’t Veer C, Mann KG. Evaluation of
the initiation phase of blood coagulation using
ultrasensitive assays for serine proteases. J Biol
Chem. 1997;272(34):21527-21533.
9. Hockin MF, Jones KC, Everse SJ, Mann KG. A
model for the stoichiometric regulation of blood
coagulation. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(21):
18322-18333.
10. Jones KC, Mann KG. A model for the tissue factor
pathway to thrombin. II. A mathematical simulation. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(37):23367-23373.
11. Rand MD, Lock JB, van’t Veer C, Gaffney DP,
Mann KG. Blood clotting in minimally altered
whole blood. Blood. 1996;88(9):3432-3445.
12. Brummel KE, Paradis SG, Butenas S, Mann KG.
Thrombin functions during tissue factor-induced
blood coagulation. Blood. 2002;100(1):148-152.
13. Cawthern KM, van’t Veer C, Lock JB, DiLorenzo
ME, Branda RF, Mann KG. Blood coagulation in
hemophilia A and hemophilia C. Blood. 1998;
91(12):4581-4592.
14. Orfeo T, Brummel-Ziedins KE, Gissel M, Butenas S,
Mann KG. The nature of the stable blood clot procoagulant activities. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(15):
9776-9786.
Badimon L. Platelet deposition induced by severely damaged vessel wall is inhibited by a boroarginine synthetic peptide with antithrombin activity. Thromb Haemost. 1994;71(4):511-516.
17. Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Lassila R, Heras M,
Chesebro JH, Fuster V. Thrombin regulation of
platelet interaction with damaged vessel wall and
isolated collagen type I at arterial flow conditions
in a porcine model: effects of hirudins, heparin,
and calcium chelation. Blood. 1991;78(2):
423-434.
18. Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Turitto VT, Vallabhajosula S, Fuster V. Platelet thrombus formation on
collagen type I. A model of deep vessel injury. Influence of blood rheology, von Willebrand factor,
and blood coagulation. Circulation. 1988;78(6):
1431-1442.
19. Hockin MF, Kalafatis M, Shatos M, Mann KG.
Protein C activation and factor Va inactivation on
human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17(11):2765-2775.
20. Turner N, Nolasco L, Tao Z, Dong JF, Moake J.
Human endothelial cells synthesize and release
ADAMTS-13. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(6):
1396-1404.
21. Shatos MA, Orfeo T, Doherty JM, Penar PL,
Collen D, Mann KG. Alpha-thrombin stimulates
urokinase production and DNA synthesis in cultured human cerebral microvascular endothelial
cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15(7):
903-911.
22. Badimon L, Turitto V, Rosemark JA, Badimon JJ,
Fuster V. Characterization of a tubular flow chamber for studying platelet interaction with biologic
and prosthetic materials: deposition of indium
111-labeled platelets on collagen, subendothelium, and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.
J Lab Clin Med. 1987;110(6):706-718.
23. Roussel JC, Moran CJ, Salvaris EJ, Nandurkar
HH, d’Apice AJ, Cowan PJ. Pig thrombomodulin
binds human thrombin but is a poor cofactor for
activation of human protein C and TAFI. Am J
Transplant. 2008;8(6):1101-1112.
24. Grau GE, Mili N, Lou JN, et al. Phenotypic and
functional analysis of pulmonary microvascular
endothelial cells from patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lab Invest. 1996;74(4):
761-770.
nent cell line expressing human factor VIII-related
antigen established by hybridization. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 1983;80(12):3734-3737.
30. Edgell CJ, Haizlip JE, Bagnell CR, et al. Endothelium specific Weibel-Palade bodies in a continuous human cell line, EA.hy926. In Vitro Cell Dev
Biol. 1990;26(12):1167-1172.
31. Schaefer HI, van’t Hooft FM, van der Laarse A.
Growth characteristics of a permanent human
endothelial cell line. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1992;
28A(7-8):465-467.
32. Bouis D, Hospers GA, Meijer C, Molema G,
Mulder NH. Endothelium in vitro: a review of human vascular endothelial cell lines for blood vessel-related research. Angiogenesis. 2001;4(2):
91-102.
33. Balasubramanian V, Grabowski E, Bini A,
Nemerson Y. Platelets, circulating tissue factor,
and fibrin colocalize in ex vivo thrombi: real-time
fluorescence images of thrombus formation and
propagation under defined flow conditions. Blood.
2002;100(8):2787-2792.
34. Mezzano D, Matus V, Saez CG, Pereira J,
Panes O. Tissue factor storage, synthesis and
function in normal and activated human platelets.
Thromb Res. 2008;122(suppl 1):S31-S36.
35. Butenas S, Bouchard BA, Brummel-Ziedins KE,
Parhami-Seren B, Mann KG. Tissue factor activity
in whole blood. Blood. 2005;105(7):2764-2770.
36. Bouchard BA, Mann KG, Butenas S. No evidence
for tissue factor on platelets. Blood. 2010;116(5):
854-855.
37. Parhami-Seren B, Butenas S, Krudysz-Amblo J,
Mann KG. Immunologic quantitation of tissue factors. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(8):1747-1755.
38. Edwards RL, Rickles FR, Bobrove AM. Mononuclear cell tissue factor: cell of origin and requirements for activation. Blood. 1979;54(2):
359-370.
39. Monroe DM, Roberts HR, Hoffman M. Platelet
procoagulant complex assembly in a tissue factor-initiated system. Br J Haematol. 1994;88(2):
364-371.
40. Egorina EM, Sovershaev MA, Bjorkoy G, et al.
Intracellular and surface distribution of monocyte
tissue factor: application to intersubject variability.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(7):
1493-1498.
25. Zhu DZ, Cheng CF, Pauli BU. Mediation of lung
metastasis of murine melanomas by a lung-specific endothelial cell adhesion molecule. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(21):9568-9572.
41. Tracy PB, Robinson RA, Worfolk LA, Allen DH.
Procoagulant activities expressed by peripheral
blood mononuclear cells. Methods Enzymol.
1993;222:281-299.
26. Milici AJ, Furie MB, Carley WW. The formation of
fenestrations and channels by capillary endothelium in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;
82(18):6181-6185.
42. Sovershaev MA, Egorina EM, Gruber FX, Olsen
JO, Osterud B. High tissue factor-expressing human monocytes carry low surface CD36: application to intersubject variability. J Thromb Haemost.
2007;5(12):2453-2460.
27. Hampel B, Fortschegger K, Ressler S, et al. Increased expression of extracellular proteins as a
hallmark of human endothelial cell in vitro senescence. Exp Gerontol. 2006;41(5):474-481.
15. Brummel-Ziedins KE, Pouliot RL, Mann KG.
Thrombin generation: phenotypic quantitation. J
Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(2):281-288.
28. Moore KL, Andreoli SP, Esmon NL, Esmon CT,
Bang NU. Endotoxin enhances tissue factor and
suppresses thrombomodulin expression of human vascular endothelium in vitro. J Clin Invest.
1987;79(1):124-130.
16. Badimon JJ, Weng D, Chesebro JH, Fuster V,
29. Edgell CJ, McDonald CC, Graham JB. Perma-
43. Brummel-Ziedins K, Vossen CY, Rosendaal FR,
Umezaki K, Mann KG. The plasma hemostatic
proteome: thrombin generation in healthy individuals. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3(7):14721481.
44. Foster WB, Tucker MM, Katzmann JA, Miller RS,
Nesheim ME, Mann KG. Monoclonal antibodies
to human coagulation factor V and factor Va.
Blood. 1983;61(6):1060-1067.
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 23 DECEMBER 2010 䡠 VOLUME 116, NUMBER 26
ENDOTHELIAL MODULATION OF WHOLE-BLOOD CLOTTING
45. Butenas S, Parhami-Seren B, Mann KG. The influence of von Willebrand factor on factor VIII activity measurements. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;
7(1):132-137.
58. Wilbourn B, Harrison P, Lawrie A, et al. Unique
expression of von Willebrand factor by type IIA
von Willebrand’s disease endothelial cells. Br J
Haematol. 1992;81(3):401-406.
46. Higgins DL, Mann KG. The interaction of bovine
factor V and factor V-derived peptides with phospholipid vesicles. J Biol Chem. 1983;258(10):
6503-6508.
59. Butenas S, Orfeo T, Mann KG. Tissue factor in
coagulation: Which? Where? When? Arterioscler
Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(12):1989-1996.
47. Brooks EG, Trotman W, Wadsworth MP, et al.
Valves of the deep venous system: an overlooked
risk factor. Blood. 2009;114(6):1276-1279.
48. Taatjes DJ, Wadsworth MP, Zaman AK,
Schneider DJ, Sobel BE. A novel dual staining
method for identification of apoptotic cells reveals
a modest apoptotic response in infarcted mouse
myocardium. Histochem Cell Biol. 2007;128(3):
275-283.
49. Butenas S, Parhami-Seren B, Gissel MT, Amblo
J, Brummel-Ziedins K, Mann KG. The nature of
LPS-stimulated monocyte tissue factor activity.
Blood. 2008; 112(11):375-376. Abstract 1022.
50. Henriksson CE, Hellum M, Landsverk KS, Klingenberg O, Joo GB, Kierulf P. Flow cytometrysorted non-viable endotoxin-treated human
monocytes are strongly procoagulant. Thromb
Haemost. 2006;96(1):29-37.
51. Mann KG. Thrombin formation. Chest. 2003;
124(3 suppl):4S-10S.
52. Mann KG, Orfeo T, Butenas S, Undas A,
Brummel-Ziedins K. Blood coagulation dynamics
in haemostasis. Hamostaseologie. 2009;29(1):716.
53. Brummel KE, Butenas S, Mann KG. An integrated
study of fibrinogen during blood coagulation.
J Biol Chem. 1999;274(32):22862-22870.
54. van’t Veer C, Mann KG. Regulation of tissue factor initiated thrombin generation by the stoichiometric inhibitors tissue factor pathway inhibitor,
antithrombin-III, and heparin cofactor-II. J Biol
Chem. 1997;272(7):4367-4377.
55. Tracy PB, Eide LL, Bowie EJ, Mann KG. Radioimmunoassay of factor V in human plasma and
platelets. Blood. 1982;60(1):59-63.
56. Maruyama I, Majerus PW. The turnover of thrombin-thrombomodulin complex in cultured human
umbilical vein endothelial cells and A549 lung
cancer cells. Endocytosis and degradation of
thrombin. J Biol Chem. 1985;260(29):
15432-15438.
57. Sato N, Kokame K, Miyata T, Kato H. Lysophosphatidylcholine decreases the synthesis of tissue
factor pathway inhibitor in human umbilical vein
endothelial cells. Thromb Haemost. 1998;79(1):
217-221.
72.
73.
60. Osterud B, Bjorklid E. Sources of tissue factor.
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006;32(1):11-23.
74.
61. Butenas S, Orfeo T, Mann KG. Tissue factor activity and function in blood coagulation. Thromb
Res. 2008;122(suppl 1):S42-S46.
75.
62. Breider MA, Yang Z. Tissue factor expression in
bovine endothelial cells induced by Pasteurella
haemolytica lipopolysaccharide and interleukin-1.
Vet Pathol. 1994;31(1):55-60.
76.
63. Yang HL, Lu FJ, Wung SL, Chiu HC. Humic acid
induces expression of tissue factor by cultured
endothelial cells: regulation by cytosolic calcium
and protein kinase C. Thromb Haemost. 1994;
71(3):325-330.
77.
64. Faucette KJ, Fitzgerald LA, Liu L, Parker CJ,
Rodgers GM. Characterization of the interactions
between procoagulant albumin and human endothelial cells. Blood. 1993;82(9):2684-2692.
78.
65. van der Logt CP, Dirven RJ, Reitsma PH, Bertina
RM. Expression of tissue factor and tissue factor
pathway inhibitor in monocytes in response to
bacterial lipopolysaccharide and phorbolester.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1994;5(2):211-220.
66. Osterud B. Tissue factor expression in blood
cells. Thromb Res. 2010;125(suppl 1):S31-S34.
67. Rodgers GM, Broze GJ Jr, Shuman MA. The
number of receptors for factor VII correlates with
the ability of cultured cells to initiate coagulation.
Blood. 1984;63(2):434-438.
68. Reuning U, Preissner KT, Muller-Berghaus G.
Two independent binding sites on monolayers of
human endothelial cells are responsible for interaction with coagulation factor VII and factor VIIa.
Thromb Haemost. 1993;69(2):197-204.
69. Camera M, Giesen PL, Fallon J, et al. Cooperation between VEGF and TNF-alpha is necessary
for exposure of active tissue factor on the surface
of human endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb
Vasc Biol. 1999;19(3):531-537.
70. Hockin MF, Cawthern KM, Kalafatis M, Mann KG.
A model describing the inactivation of factor Va by
APC: bond cleavage, fragment dissociation, and
product inhibition. Biochemistry. 1999;38(21):
6918-6934.
71. Kalafatis M, Rand MD, Mann KG. The mechanism of inactivation of human factor V and human
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
6091
factor Va by activated protein C. J Biol Chem.
1994;269(50):31869-31880.
Esmon CT. The protein C pathway. Chest. 2003;
124(3 suppl):26S-32S.
Mann KG, Hockin MF, Begin KJ, Kalafatis M. Activated protein C cleavage of factor Va leads to dissociation of the A2 domain. J Biol Chem. 1997;
272(33):20678-20683.
Kalafatis M, Mann KG. Role of the membrane in
the inactivation of factor Va by activated protein
C. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(36):27246-27257.
Jaffe EA, Nachman RL, Becker CG, Minick CR.
Culture of human endothelial cells derived from
umbilical veins. Identification by morphologic and
immunologic criteria. J Clin Invest. 1973;52(11):
2745-2756.
Castellot JJ Jr, Addonizio ML, Rosenberg R, Karnovsky MJ. Cultured endothelial cells produce a
heparinlike inhibitor of smooth muscle cell
growth. J Cell Biol. 1981;90(2):372-379.
Goldsmith JC, McCormick JJ, Yen A. Endothelial
cell cycle kinetics. Changes in culture and correlation with endothelial properties. Lab Invest.
1984;51(6):643-647.
Adragna NC. Changes in cation composition of
aortic endothelial cells in culture. Tissue Cell.
1988;20(3):313-329.
Fry GL. Modification of phenotypic-expression of
human vascular endothelium in culture. Arteriosclerosis. 1988;8(5):A666-A666.
Rodriguez-Morata A, Garzon I, Alaminos M, et al.
Cell viability and prostacyclin release in cultured
human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Ann Vasc
Surg. 2008;22(3):440-448.
Brown ML, Deykin D. Passage state affects arachidonic acid content and eicosanoid release in
porcine aortic endothelial cells. Arterioscler
Thromb. 1991;11(1):167-173.
Hoffman M, Cooper ST. Thrombin enhances
monocyte secretion of tumor necrosis factor and
interleukin-1 beta by two distinct mechanisms.
Blood Cells Mol Dis. 1995;21(2):156-167.
Kessels H, Willems G, Hemker HC. Analysis of
thrombin generation in plasma. Comput Biol Med.
1994;24(4):277-288.
Downing MR, Bloom JW, Mann KG. Comparison
of the inhibition of thrombin by three plasma protease inhibitors. Biochemistry. 1978;17(13):
2649-2653.
Xu J, Esmon NL, Esmon CT. Reconstitution of the
human endothelial cell protein C receptor with
thrombomodulin in phosphatidylcholine vesicles
enhances protein C activation. J Biol Chem.
1999;274(10):6704-6710.
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only.
2010 116: 6082-6091
doi:10.1182/blood-2010-01-266395 originally published
online September 23, 2010
Cellular regulation of blood coagulation: a model for venous stasis
James E. Campbell, Kathleen E. Brummel-Ziedins, Saulius Butenas and Kenneth G. Mann
Updated information and services can be found at:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/116/26/6082.full.html
Articles on similar topics can be found in the following Blood collections
Thrombosis and Hemostasis (1075 articles)
Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests
Information about ordering reprints may be found online at:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints
Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at:
http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml
Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by the American Society
of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20036.
Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved.