Proposed Graduate Seminar: Meaning, Language, and Experience: Common Roots of Continental and Analytic Philosophy This syllabus was written for a graduate seminar. A version of the course suitable for an advanced undergraduate course or masters course would also be possible, with fewer readings divided into shorter segments, much less secondary literature, and several short papers or take-home exams during the semester in place of the précis and final paper. Course Description and Objectives This course will survey ideas about meaning, language, and experience in European philosophy around the turn of the twentieth century, focusing especially on how they contributed to the division of philosophy into “continental” and “analytic” traditions. In addition to examining the historical origins and early texts representative of this divide, we shall also address the question of its relevance in the twenty-first century, and whether the distinction between these types of philosophy is—or ever was—as clear-cut as many have assumed it to be. Even those who self-identify as doing one of these types of philosophy or the other do not always agree on how the distinction should be defined: Should it be characterized in terms of ongoing historical movements? Research programs? Styles of doing or writing about philosophy, regardless of content? Unique sets of philosophical problems? Our goal in this course will be to read and understand some important and representative texts from the period of the emergence of this distinction, with an eye to reexamining it in the broader context of the history of philosophy and in terms of the contemporary state of the discipline. Requirements and Grading Participation (attendance and active participation in class, including informal presentations) 20% Four précis, on four different authors of your choice (see below) 10% each x 4= 40% Final paper of 12- 15 pages, on a topic cleared with me in advance (see below) 40% Writing Requirements In addition to careful reading and participation in class, a significant portion of your grade (80%) will come from writing assignments. For four of the reading assignments during the semester other than those from Crowell, Friedman, Glock, Lawlor, and Soames you are expected to submit a précis: a highly concise, one-page prose summary of the main points and argument of the text. You may choose the days/ assignments for which to submit the précis, but each of them must treat a different author. It is in your best interest to begin work on these early in the semester, as the feedback from the first one will be helpful in improving your skill at this type of writing for subsequent submissions. Although you need only submit four précis during the semester, you are allowed to submit up to six. For students submitting more than four, only the best four will be counted toward your final grade. A separate handout explaining the précis in more detail will be distributed at the beginning of the semester. In addition to the four précis, you are expected to write a 12- 15 page final paper dealing with some of the themes and figures discussed in the course, on a topic cleared with me well in advance. Course Schedule Assuming 1-2 seminar meetings per week, (two to four hours of total class time) week 1 week 2 Jacob Rump I. Precursors and Problems Class Introduction, Syllabus, Opening Discussion Friedman, a Parting of the Ways, Preface and Chapter 1 Lawlor, Early Twentieth-Century Continental Philosophy (selections) Soames, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Introduction Hume, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding (selections) Graduate Seminar Syllabus: Common Roots of Continental and Analytic Philosophy 1 Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (selections) Kant, Critique of the Power of Judgment (selections) week 3 Nietzsche, “On Truth and Lying in a Non-moral Sense” Comte, Introduction to Positive Philosophy Mill, A System of Logic (selections) Glock, What is Analytic Philosophy?, pp. 1- 56 (Introduction, Historical Overview) II. The Turn to Meaning week 4 Brentano, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (selections) Meinong, “The Theory of Objects” Kriegel, “Phenomenal Intentionality Past and Present” Dewalque, “Brentano on the Parts of the Mental: A Mereological Approach to Phenomenal Intentionality” week 5 Frege, “Sense and Reference” Frege, “Concept and Object” Hale and Wright, “Horse Sense” week 6 Husserl, Logical Investigations, “Prolegomena to Pure Logic” (selections) Frege, “The Thought” Benoist, “Theories of Reference in Both Early Phenomenology and Early Analytic Philosophy.” Aquila, “Husserl and Frege on Meaning.” week 7 Russell, The Philosophy of Logical Atomism (selections) Wittgenstein, Tractatus, (complete, but focusing on assigned propositions) Tejedor, “The Metaphysical Status of Tractarian Objects” week 8 III. Emerging Differences Natorp, “On the Objective and Subjective Grounding of Knowledge” Husserl, Introduction to Phenomenology week 9 Blumberg and Feigl, “Logical Positivism” Carnap, The Logical Construction of the World (selections) Carnap, Pseudo-Problems in Philosophy week 10 Schlick, “Is there a Material A Priori?” Husserl and Heidegger “Phenomenology” (The Encyclopedia Britannica Article) Livingston, “Husserl and Schlick on the Logical Form of Experience” week 11 Heidegger, Being and Time (selections) Okrent, “Equipment, World, and Language.” week 12 Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (selections) Husserl, “The Origin of Geometry” Derrida, “Form and Meaning: A Note on the Phenomenology of Language” Hyder, “Foucault, Cavaillès, and Husserl on the Historical Epistemology of the Sciences.” Jacob Rump Graduate Seminar Syllabus: Common Roots of Continental and Analytic Philosophy 2 week 13 IV. Looking Back: A Century Later McDowell, Mind and World (selections) Crowell, Husserl, Heidegger, and The Space of Meaning (selections) Zahavi. Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity: A Response to the Linguistic-Pragmatic Critique (selections) week 14 Glock, What is Analytic Philosophy?, pp. 231- 261 (“Concluding Discussion”) Lawlor, Early Twentieth-Century Continental Philosophy (selections) Reynolds, Chase, Mares, and Williams Post-analytic and Metacontinental: Overcoming the Divide (selected essays) week 15 Final Discussion Jacob Rump Graduate Seminar Syllabus: Common Roots of Continental and Analytic Philosophy 3
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz