TJECJEJ H O J B A .J E L T M B J E tA .J jD . lieves that it is true o f such Colleges as Hobart, th at from a class of tw enty or fifty a clever professor cannot sift out the idle and the fraudulent ? We do not, we are quite sure that no incompetent man graduates here or elsewhere whose graduation could not and and should not have been prevented. Why i t is not, we do not inquire. We are content with saying that i f good reasons exist for graduating incapables, or if, perchance, we are mistaken in supposing their in capacity to "be known, then it is tim e that the style o f the Diplomas should "be changed and made to correspond with the facts. We should be sorry to lose the sonorous old phrases, but we should nevertheless approve of a simple statement, in a tongue which its possessor could surely read, that N. or M. had resided four years at Hobart College; had during that time paid all his dues; and was now about to go away. Such a certificate would have all the value of the pre sent Diploma, would raise no false expectations, and would save the College Conscience (if there be such a thing), from what m ust sometimes be a fearful strain. AHCHERT. Wise was the poet’s thought that coupled love With archery, and spoke o f Cupid’s bow; B ut little skill the painter showed, who strove To make that image on his canvas glow, When he a w inged boy with petty weapons drew. The how o f love is s ix feet long, tough yew, In no weak baby grasp hut strongly held By lon g white hands and arms, whose muscles swelled To fulness reach in sweet curve after curve, While all constrained the rising bosom spurns, • And from the whole lithe body, without swerve, As driven by one pulse and breath, the dart Flies to the goal; then, when the bright face turns Toward you, you find love’s arrow in your heart. A. U. E . E. To the E ditor of the Herald : D e a b Slit :—I n one of the earlier numbers of you paper occurred an allusion to the rules for attendance upon recitations. The subject is n good one for consideration, and one which, we think, both Faculty and students agree ought to be properly settled. As one of those rules now exists, it m ust be admitted a failure. It is a failure be cause it encourages the student to deceive, and it encourages because it is m anifestly unjust. We refer to the well known enactment which reads. ‘£ Single absence from reci tations shall n o t b e excused, and shall receive no grade. Absences for a longer period must be accompanied by a physician’s certificate o f sickness, or hy other satisfactory explanations.” The ev il whicli this rule was designed to cure, is w ell known. B u t just where it fails can be seen at 53 a glance, or with a m om ent’s thought. It was not intend ed to apply to a case of genuine protracted illn e ss; but the student for whom it was intended, who trumps up an ex cuse of sickness w hich kept h im from one class, finds no difficulty, but rather an added pleasure, in feigning sickness for a longer time. H e does not suffer, but the conscientious student does, as we will show. If a student is ill, but does not wish to lose a recitation, and keeps about till after the second, then, finding that h e can do no more, fails to attend the third; or, if he is taken suddenly ill and loses one reci tation, and in both these, and other similar cases, recovers before the next day, he cannot be excused, and receives a zero. But if he has an eye to worldly prudence, lie can easily see that his best course is to delay recovery a few hours so as to have ‘‘ absence for a longer tim e.” Some kind friend brings up the ‘‘little covered basket,” and the poor invalid is cared for till he has had at least two ab sences, and can he excused. The whole tenor of such- a rule is to treat the strictly honest student unfairly, and is therefore the greatest encouragement for him to stretch his conscience, or to imagine he lias not recovered fully. It seems to us that to a rule which can not he justly enforced, and whose lack of enforcement lias to be “ winked at ” like tlie old days of ignorance in th e earth, the words, •‘ N othing’ in h is life Became him like the leaving it ,” fittingly apply. If yon will allow us a little more space, we would like to suggest a student’s view o f a remedy. It seems to us that a student’s grade should in no way be made dependent upon liis moral character, nor arbitrarily upon his real or pretended state of health. I f the appointed work of the classroom is done at the end of a month, or term, or year, as the case may he, let th e student receive his grade even though he lias been sick or out of class every other day. If his work is not fully done, let him be awarded the mark whicli he has earned. Much as sickness is to be regretted, aud vice deplored, neither one, in our opinion, ought to be the occasion of a poor grade, provided the student has really done his work. A system of optional attendance, with monthly examinations, would remove the difficulty. The evil of cramming is urged against such a plan ; but if the examinations are sufficiently frequent, a.stu dent will not have time to eram enough to interfere with his mental digestion, or derange his intellectual system. Several ex aminations daring the term would b e a better test of a student’s accomplishments than one examination at the close preceded hy no review, as is often the case. Such a course would, perhaps, prevent as much surface being cov ered, hut the mental training would he better; there would be less cramming. If a student is to he a sieve, and the object is to see how much can be pushed through his miud regardless of the quantity or quality retained, we grant that our plan would not he the best. But such is not our
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz