Selective Dopamine D3/D2 Receptor Antagonist PF-04363467 Travis Wager on behalf of the D3 GPCR Team 6th RSC / SCI symposium on GPCRs in Medicinal Chemistry Day 2 - Tuesday 14th June, 13:50 Aptuit, Verona, Italy D3 Antagonists Work By Reducing Aberrant Reward And Could Impact Many Diseases So Why Opioid Addiction? Reward response to stimuli Disease Population R e w Aberrant reward a function r d Normal D3/D2 treatment in Disease Population Reward response V a l u e • More Americans now die every year from drug overdoses than they do from motor vehicle crashes • Over the last decade, opioid consumption has increased nearly 500%, overdoses quadrupled and death increased over 4% leading CDC to place opioid addiction on the top-five public health challenges to address https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pressoffice/2015/10/21 Case Study Stimulus Stimulus Stimulus The abnormal response (aberrant reward function) to stimuli or cues translates as a disease. Examples: Opioids → opioid addicts Cigarettes → smokers Food → obese Hand washing → OCD Shopping → compulsive shoppers 112 opioid dependent veterans 78% completed detoxification and referred to Intensive Outpatient Program (49% naltrexone, 76% aftercare plan) 22% completed 90 days of treatment 3% were abstinent from opioids at 90 days 1 year follow up: 4.5% had died Davison et al. J Addict Disorders 2006 Pfizer Confidential │ 2 There is an Urgent Need for Better Treatments for Substance Use Disorders Prioritized Substance Use Disorders G7 Prevalence /Treatment Substance Use Disorders are a major contributor to global societal burden $560B in annual costs for health, welfare and lost productivity in US alone > 200M people with tobacco, alcohol, or opioid use disorders in G7 • Few seek treatment from HCPs; consequences of use accelerates presentation / treatment rates (e.g. overdose/DUI, legal). • High relapse rate: ~ 80% within first year Tobacco 142M Alcohol 59M Opioids 5.4M Prevalence Few patients achieve long-term abstinence (> 1 y) with existing treatments. Abstinence rates: Smoking cessation (22%), Alcohol (20%) and Opioid (13%) Source: Decision Resources Epi-Database, WHO, Lancet Note: OTC and Rx treatment can be +/- HCP recommended psychosocial interventions What’s new and interesting: D3 or D3 preferring D3/D2 Partial Agonists or Antagonists BioProjet 1.4979 D3 Ki: 0.3 nM (partial agonist) D2 Ki: 957 nM (2737x) Dofet. IC50: 6.9 uM (~1000x) Signal of efficacy in Phase Ib (10 patients, heavy smokers) Phase II POC study in smoking cessation was complete in Oct. 2014. Results are unknown. LD CS Preclinical Phase I Phase II Phase III Market GSK598809 (Development Halted) D3 Ki: 2.4 nM D2 Ki: 3189 nM (3148x) HLM: 38 MDR: 2.8 RRCK: 8 hERG IC50: 1.2 uM Signal of efficacy in smoking population (Psychometric signal) 4 Corporate file mining leads and tool compound Compound D3 Ki ( nM)a D2 Ki ( nM)b D2/D3 D3 Functional Ki (nM)c 1e 20.1 1600 84 Antagonist 2f 3 679 3 >5000 428 >7 143 Agonist 1.3 Functional Activity Antagonist Selectivity and ADME Properties of PF-04363467 10% at 10 uM HLM Papp NIH P-gp mBcrp Rat AUC0-∞ Cb,u/Cp,u PF04363467 126 8.4 6.6 2.4 1.01 100% at 10 uM 4 nM ALPHA2A CHT1 Ca Chan 5HT2B Na Chan M5 ALPHA2B M1 M3 LTB4 BLT1 SIGMA M4 ALPHA2C CYP2C9 5HT1A 5HT2A D1 H3 CYP3A4b CYP3A4 5HT2A 5HT6 D2S D2 CYP2C19 D3 7600 nM Compound • Highly selective D3/D2 antagonist • Need to reduce Cyp2C19 inhibition Figure 3: Human in vivo data vs NIH MDR efflux ratio • Free brain drug levels are unity with the plasma compartment • Human CSF levels are predicted to be high. D3R and D2R brain receptor occupancy from autoradiography techniques in rats A) B) Ex-Vivo, D3 Receptor Occupancy Ex-Vivo, D2 Receptor Occupancy 100 80 60 40 20 0 Dose = 0.1 -13 10 -12 10 3.2 -11 -10 10 PF-04363467 80 60 40 15 7 0 Dose = 0.01 0.032 0.1 32 mg/kg -9 10 10 10 Free Brain Concentration (nM) Compound 100 96 -8 10 -12 -7 10 10 -10 -8 10 10 Free Brain Concentration (nM) 32 mg/kg D3 EVRO % RO Observeda --- D2 EVRO % RO Observedb 85.9 ± 1.7 10 mg/kg 98.8 ± 2.4 50.6 ± 3.5 3.2 mg/kg 99.9 ± 0.5 34.7 ± 1.5 0.1 mg/kg 33.6 ± 4.5 10.8 ± 4.1 0.03 mg/kg 6.3 ± 10.1 --- EC50 1.5 ± 0.4 nM 46.6 ± 9.1 nM D50 0.7 mg/kg 7.2 mg/kg Treatment 3.2 10 mg/kg -6 10 Nicotine Cessation Pfizer D3 Antagonist Shows Similar Reduction in Nicotine Intake to Chantix Drug Seeking Model ‘467 Dose 3.2 10 32 D3 RO % 100 99 ND Measured D2 RO % 35 58 86 * ** Pfizer Confidential │ 8 Opioid Relapse Pfizer D3 Antagonist Reduces Opioid Relapse in Response to Drug-paired Cues Drug Seeking Model A) # I n f u s io n s ( M e a n + S E M ) 30 25 20 15 Extinction Vehicle 3, 3.2 mg/kg 3, 10 mg/kg 3, 32 mg/kg 10 *** 5 *** *** ‘467 Dose 3.2 10 32 D3 RO % 100 99 ND Measured D2 RO % 35 58 86 n F en ta n ta en D yl yl 3 F Treatment ay 2 ay D D ay 1 yl n ta en F F en ta n yl 0 But….D2 are know to cause sedation and unwanted extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) PF-04363467 does not produce catalepsy and does not affect spontaneous locomotor activity at doses tested Catalepsy Experiment (20 sec cutoff criteria) ‘467 Dose 3.2 10 32 D3 RO % 100 99 ND Measured D2 RO % 35 58 86 Titrating in D2 at levels required for improved efficacy does not produce catalepsy or reductions in locomotor activity. 10 Early Efforts to Understand PF-04363467 Binding Two sulfonamide binding modes proposed based on SAR, mutagenesis and modeling o Proposed binding modes interact with conserved Asp110 through the basic nitrogen of the morpholine or the sulfonamide NH o Secondary binding pocket is better filled by the morpholine binding mode o Orthosteric pocket is better filled by the sulfonamide binding mode PF-04363467 PF-04363467 Morpholine-D110 interaction Sulfonamide-D110 interaction A) B) SBP TM7 Glu90 Ile183 TM2 TM6 TM2 TM6 TM7 Tyr36 Tyr36 TM5 OBS Asp110 TM4 TM3 TM5 Tyr373 TM1 OBS Asp110 Tyr373 TM1 TM4 TM3 Eticlopride (literature xray structure) in gray Prospective In silico prediction of 476 binding mode A collaboration between Neuroscience Medicinal Chemistry and Acellera 1 2 D110 3 4 F197 5 Anabella Villalobos Noelia Ferruz & Simone Sciabola Physicochemical properties and CNS MPO desirability CNS MPO Desirability Compound 1 Alignment of ADME attributes Compound 2 Compound 3 Property Value Component Score Value Component Score Value Component Score MW 402 0.70 235 1.00 403 0.70 ClogP 4.46 0.27 1.48 1.00 4.06 0.47 TPSA 67.4 1.00 51.4 1.00 58.6 1.00 ClogD7.4 1.06 1.00 0.76 1.00 3.96 0.02 HBD 2 0.50 2 0.50 1 0.83 pKa 10.6 0.00 7.5 1.00 7.5 1.00 CNS MPO aCalculated 3.5/ 6.0 5.5/ 6.0 4.0/ 6.0 CNS MPO desirability scores were obtained using the published algorithm. Wager, T. T., Hou, X., Verhoest, P. R., and Villalobos A. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 1, 435-449, 2010. Summary of PF-04363467 Medicinal Chemistry Parameters Modeled binding to D3 based on MD simulations LipE 4.6 LE 0.3 CNS MPO 4.0 cLogP 4.1 cLogD 3.9 pKa 7.5 GPCR activity (nM) Novel induced binding pocket PK D3 antagonist 3.0 NIH MDR AB/AB 6.6 D2 antagonist 428 RRCK AB 8.4 D2/D3 143x HLM 120 5HT6 900 Cyp2C19 110 nM 5-HT1A partial agonist 1100 Rat AUC0-∞ Cb,u/Cp,u 1.0 5HT2A, 1400 nM 1400 hERG = 1.7 uM PF-04363467 is a potent brain penetrant selective D3/D2 compound. Efficacy in rodent models of addiction require some D2 activity No EPS liabilities observed with selective D3/D2 antagonist PF-04363467 at high D2 RO High HLM clearance precludes clinical development of PF-04363467 CNS MPO suggests lowering ClogD with improve ADME and Safety attributes Pfizer Confidential │ 14 Acknowledgements Chemistry Structure Biology PPG Biology Bethany Kormos Simone Sciabola Xinjun Hou Natasha Kablaoui Jaclyn Henderson Noelia Ferruz Nandini Patel Jamie Tuttle Patrick Verhoest Travis Wager Joe Young Joe Tucker Rama Chandrasekaran Thomas Knauber Karen Coffman Tom Chappie Robin Nelson Matt Griffor Eric Marr Xiaomin Chen Yaozhong Zou Xiayang Qiu Michelle Vanase-Frawley Claire Steppan Rebecca O’Connor Andy Mead Liz Dunn-Sims Jamie DaSilva Mark Majchrzak Keith Dlugolenski Chris Schmidt Nancy Stratman Corey Puryear David Horton Patricio O’Donnell PDM Aarti Sawant-Basak Christine Orozco Safety Jessica Whritenour Gary Freeman Pharm Sci Suman Luthra Amber Haugeto Clinical Chris Chatham Brendon Binneman Danny Chen Renee Heese David Nguyen 15
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz