PARCC Results:
Orange Board of Education
October 11, 2016
Measuring College and Career
Readiness
NJDOE and PARCC misaligned charter students,
giving their scores to Orange.
ELA
Grade/Subject
2015
% Met Expectations/Exceeded
Expectations
2016
% Met Expectations/Exceeded
Expectations
Orange
Difference
3
14%
23%
+9
4.1
4
24%
24%
-
2.4
5
24%
30%
+6
1.7
6
25%
30%
+5
3.5
7
30%
34%
+4
4.7
8
31%
34%
+3
3.6
9
24%
25%
+1
9.2
10
12%
26%
+14
7.7
11
21%
24%
+3
.9
NJ
Difference
ELA
MATHEMATICS
Grade/Subject
3
4
5
6
7
8
Algebra I
Algebra II
Geometry
2015
% Met Expectations/Exceeded
Expectations
2016
% Met Expectations/Exceeded
Expectations
Orange Difference
15%
19%
18%
15%
18%
13%
23%
9%
Scores suppressed
28%
20%
21%
15%
16%
17%
25%
14%
11%
+13
+1
+3
-2
+4
+2
+5
-
NJ Difference
6.8
5.9
6.2
2.2
1.9
2.1
5.2
1.1%
PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS
 Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations
 Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations
 Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations
 Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations
 Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations
Orange Public Schools’
2016 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL Outcomes
English Language Arts/Literacy
Count of
Valid Test
Scores
Not Yet
Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
Meeting
Expectations
(Level 4)
Exceeding
Expectation
(Level 5)
District
% >=
Level 4
NJ % >=
Level 4
Grade 3
423
29%
23%
25%
22%
1%
23%
47%
Grade 4
422
19%
26%
31%
22%
2%
24%
54%
Grade 5
366
16%
27%
27%
28%
2%
30%
53%
Grade 6
367
16%
26%
28%
27%
3%
30%
52%
Grade 7
338
17%
21%
29%
27%
7%
34%
57%
Grade 8
306
16%
18%
31%
30%
4%
34%
56%
Grade 9
290
27%
27%
21%
22%
3%
25%
48%
Grade 10
277
34%
22%
17%
21%
5%
26%
43%
Grade 11
256
30%
23%
23%
20%
4%
24%
39%
ELA BY SCHOOL
3
4
5
6
7
8
CIAO
Cleveland
14%
18%
33%
12%
38%
Forest
22%
22%
52%
56%
54%
Heywood
40%
23%
51%
16%
37%
Lincoln
17%
23%
18%
38%
27%
Oakwood
32%
24%
25%
23%
15%
OHS
OPA
34%
Park
18%
33%
17%
32%
37%
RPCS
27%
22%
26%
21%
32%
Suppresse
d
9
10
11
Suppresse
d
Suppresse
d
Suppresse
d
0%
26%
24%
27%
ORANGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS’
2016 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES
MATHEMATICS
Count of
Valid Test
Scores
Not Yet
Meeting
(Level 1)
Grade 3
432
23%
Grade 4
425
Grade 5
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
Meeting
Expectations
(Level 4)
Exceeding
Expectation
(Level 5)
District
% >=
Level 4
NJ % >=
Level 4
26%
23%
22%
6%
28%
52%
23%
33%
25%
19%
1%
20%
46%
370
21%
25%
32%
21%
0%
21%
47%
Grade 6
376
23%
34%
28%
15%
0%
15%
42%
Grade 7
351
19%
36%
29%
16%
0%
16%
38%
Grade 8*
305
31%
28%
24%
17%
0%
17%
26%
Algebra I
335
22%
26%
27%
24%
1%
25%
41%
Algebra II
328
54%
23%
9%
14%
0%
14%
25%
Geometry
219
18%
49%
21%
11%
0%
11%
27%
MATHEMATICS BY SCHOOL
3
4
5
6
7
8
CIAO
Cleveland
33%
24%
26%
14%
27%
Forest
22%
18%
27%
18%
21%
Heywood
53%
27%
27%
9%
22%
Lincoln
13%
10%
16%
17%
15%
Oakwood
24%
14%
6%
6%
3%
OHS
OPA
17%
Park
18%
24%
26%
18%
13%
RPCS
38%
24%
19%
15%
15%
Suppresse
d
Algebra I
Algebra II
Geometry
Suppresse
d
Suppresse
d
Suppresse
d
5%
9%
12%
27%
66%
Suppresse
d
MATHEMATICS DISAGGREGATED DATA
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
ELL
IEP
Non-IEP
NJ
Cross-State
ELA DISAGGREGATED DATA
100
90
80
70
ELL
IEP
Non-IEP
NJ
Cross-State
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Mathematics Differences between 2015 and 2016
14
Differences between percent proficient on PARCC mathematics assessments
12.8
11.9
12
10
8
6.8
6.2
6
6
5.3
5.2
4.6
4.4
Orange
4
3.4
2.1
2.1
1.9
2
1.8
1.2
0.8
-0.1
0
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
-2
Grade 7
-2
-4
NJ
Grades
Grade 8
Algebra I
Algebra II
Geometry
ELA Differences between 2015 and 2016
16
14
14.4
12
10
9.2
9.2
7.8
8
NJ
Orange
6
6.1
4.7
4
4
3.5
4.7
3.6
3.9
3.4
2.4
2.8
1.8
2
1.5
Grade 3
-2
-0.9
-0.1
0
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
MATHEMATICS NEXT STEPS
 Teachers develop and communicate clear learning goals and
how these ideas build on and relate to each other.
 Carefully select tasks that promote reasoning and problem
solving to engage students in higher level thinking
 Encourage the use of visual representation
 Use evidence of student thinking
Math Journals
Exit Tickets
Performance
Tasks/
Cognitive
Interviews
ELA NEXT STEPS
• Focus on Key Ideas and Details in literature
• Revise the literacy block to include intentional whole group, small
group, independent work, and targeted instruction
• Increase digital silent reading support and practice
• Build knowledge and strengthen comprehension
Scope
and
Sequence
Revisions
iRead
Read 180
Reading
Plus
Read
Aloud
Project
Revised
Prentice
Hall
Expeditionary
Learning
PCG
Pathways
to Careers
HIGH SCHOOL AP RESULTS
School Year
# of Exams
Taken
# Passing
(score of 3-5)
% Passing
2015
156
25
16.0%
2016
154
36
23.4%
Increase % of
Students Passing
44%
DISTRICT
4 YEAR GRADUATION RATES
( * 2 0 1 6 D ATA P R E L I M I N A R Y P E R N J S M A R T )
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Graduation Rate
79.6%
86.2%
86.6
2014
2015
93.3%
66.8%
58.3%
2011
2012
2013
2016*
16
WHERE ARE THE 257 MEMBERS OF THE
CLASS OF 2016 NOW?
 Two and four year colleges and universities 72.5%
 2 year- 37.4%
 4 year- 33.1%
 Technical post-secondary schools
 Unknown 8.2%
 Military 4.7%
 Employed 1.9%
 Gap year 1.2%
 Apprenticeship Program 0.4%
11.3%
FOR MORE INFORMATION
http://understandthescore.org/
http://www.nj.gov/education/sca/parcc/