DECONET- Public
procurers Network
for sustainable
Managing of
decontamination of
Land
Proposal -Coordination and
support actions
Evaluation result:12,5
On the reserve list!
Abstract:

facilitate remediation and management of contaminated land in a
sustainable way for meeting current and future societal challenges

Finding and promoting synergies in various public policies is even more
necessary and public procurements will reinforce their role in the
development, implementation and value creation by innovative
concepts and technologies for a better uptake of sustainable
remediation of sites.

A European durable network of public procurers and their remediation
experts and service providers for promoting a more sustainable land
remediation approach new innovative concepts, for the administrative
execution of public procurements.

Deliverables: effective methodologies, strategies and instruments that
could be adapted for each country for concrete and efficient
implementation in public procurements.
Facilitating the re-use of land for buildings and infrastructure and
avoiding the use of green field land form part of European sustainable
development objectives


On the long term DECONET, as the basis of a future durable EU network,
will in its broad coverage of topics significantly contribute by
accelerating contaminated sites remediation
Objectives
Innovation Procurement approach
Consortium
17 partners
from 9
countries
+ 6 associate
Partners
Project structure
Further development

Call winner: BRODISE (BROWNFIELD Decontamination in
Southern Europe. Preparing PCP to R+D for efficient, cost
effective and innovative solutions for brownfields
decontamination (11 partners – 3 Countries) 14 points

DECONET submitted a redress against the evaluation:





Factual and professional / management errors
Spurious remarks that appear prejudicial and not factual, which
draw into question the impartiality of evaluators.
Inconsistency of scoring with remarks
Expertise of the evaluators
The Evaluation report comments do not appear very closely
connected to the call text and we question the alignment of
the different evaluated proposals with the call text.