Selection of Water Projects Break history One of the most obvious reasons for selecting a water line for replacement is the history of breaks on a particular water line. A water line, that is continually having problems, uses up manpower, time, and resources that can be used in other areas. Another issue is the inconvenience and constant interruption to service for water customers. Age of water lines If all things are equal between two water lines, an older water line should be replaced prior to a line that is newer. The older line poses a higher chance of a catastrophic failure. Population density Consideration needs to be given to the number of customers affected by a deteriorating water line. A water line that has more customers on it will rank higher than one with fewer. Replacement of a higher service line will have a greater impact on customer service. Economic development If the city shows a proactive approach to economic development by addressing the infrastructure in an area that can attract businesses, potential developers could see this as a positive for investing in our community. Cost analysis For the most part, any water line replacement will cost approximately the same for the same length of pipe depending on the size and location to the street. If a water line replacement is, for the most part, located in yards, more could be accomplished compared to a line in which the street will need to be repaired afterwards. Grant and funding opportunities A water line may be found eligible for grants or funding and to qualify may have to be done within a certain timeframe. Anything that will reduce the cost will be considered. Water Line Breaks Since 2010 Street Aberdeen Adams Alexander Alter Arden Barclay Brady Ave Brady Circle Braybarton Braybarton Circle Broadway Brondus Bryden Buena Vista Canary Alley Capital Carnegie Cedar Central Cherry Chestnut Cleveland County Road 26 Court Alley Columbus Circle Crestline Cunningham Drive Cunningham Lane Dock Dresden East Argonne East Carlton Efts Euclid Fernwood Road Fort Steuben Dr. Garden Acres 2010 5 3 2011 7 2012 5 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 1 3 3 2013 3 6 1 2014 4 1 1 4 1 1 1 3 5 1 3 4 1 2 9 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 8 1 4 1 3 1 3 4 2 1 1 5 2 1 1 2 1 1 10 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 Total 24 9 3 1 1 5 5 2 10 1 1 1 10 19 1 1 1 1 4 1 8 8 15 2 1 1 6 1 2 1 1 13 4 1 1 1 2 Garfield Glendwell Alley Glendwell Granard Elaine Harvard Henry Hiddenwood Highland Jefferson Johnson Keagler Kendall Kilgore Kingston Labelle Ave Lafayette Laila Ct. Lauretta Lawson Lincoln Ave Linday Way Linden Linduff Logan Longford Lovers Lane Mall Drive Margaret Maryland Market Maxwell Mears Merryman North Lake Erie Ohio SR 7 Opal Orchard Parkdale Pembroke Pennsylvania Permars Run 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 3 1 16 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 3 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 4 1 24 1 8 1 1 2 1 2 2 6 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 4 8 1 3 4 1 1 Pershing Pico Pine Valley Pittsburgh Portland Powell Preston Princeton Prospect Richland Ridge Rockdale Rosemont Ross Park Rosslyn Scenic Scioto Shirley Circle South South Bend South Forest Spencer Spring St. Andrews St. Charles Stanton Starkdale Steele Steeple Chase Sunset Teresa Terri Troy Tweed Union University Vernon Ward Washington Webster West Carlton Westwood 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 7 1 1 4 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 6 2 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 7 4 2 9 13 1 2 1 1 1 5 3 13 1 5 1 1 7 4 1 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 1 1 5 White Oaks Whitehaven Wilshire Wilson Woodland Woodlawn Ct. Yale 3rd 4th 6th 7th 8th 1 2 3 1 1 5 5 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Totals 4 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 103 70 113 127 41 This is from January of 2010 through February 24th of 2014 2 9 13 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 5 20102014 454
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz