Draft Trim Development Plan 2008 – 2014
Report on submissions received in respect of
The Draft Trim Development Plan 2008 – 2014
Prepared by the Planning Department of Meath County Council
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this document is to report on the outcome of the consultation process on the Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014, set out
the Planning Department’s response to the issues raised in the submissions, and to make recommendations to the Manager on changes to the
Draft Plan as appropriate. This report is laid out in three parts:
Section 1 ‘Public Consultation on Draft Trim Development Plan’ gives an overview of the public consultation undertaken by Meath County
Council and Trim Town Council for the Draft Trim Development Plan.
Section 2 ‘Submissions and Observations Received’ contains an analysis of the 70 no. submissions and observations which were received
during the statutory public consultation process. It (i) lists the persons or bodies who made submissions or observations, (ii) summarises the
issues raised by the persons or bodies in the submissions or observations, and (iii) gives the recommendation of the Planning Department to
the issues raised in the submissions received. In some instances, recommendations are made which propose an amendment to the Trim
Development Plan.
Appendix A lists the persons / bodies who were informed of the publication of the Draft Development Plan under the statutory process.
2
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
SECTION 1: PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON DRAFT TRIM DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Seventy written submissions were received during this consultation period. Meath County Council and Trim Town Council wish to express their
appreciation to those who made submissions. Copies of all submission received are available to view at the Planning Department, Abbey
Road, Navan during normal working hours.
The consultation process comprised of three elements:
• Display
• Press
• Website
Display
The Proposed Draft Trim Plan was placed on public display for 10 weeks from Friday the 21st of December to Friday the 29th of February 2008
in the Planning Department of Meath County Council and the Trim Area Office. Copies of the Draft Plan were also placed in the public library
buildings in Navan and Trim. For the full length of the display period planning staff were available during office hours to discuss the Draft Plan
in the Planning Dept. in Abbey Mall and to advise on how to make a submission.
Press
The required statutory notice advertisement was placed in the Irish Independent dated the 21st of December and the Meath Chronicle
newspaper dated the 2nd of January announcing the commencement of the public display and public consultation period for the Draft Trim
Development Plan. A notice was also placed in the ‘Focus on Trim’ newsletter.
Website
The Draft Trim Development Plan, both maps and text were placed on the website on Monday 21st of December 2007.
Approach to Consideration of Written Submissions
Following the initial recording of all submissions, each submission was individually assessed, summarised and proposed changes
recommended, where appropriate as detailed below.
Next Steps
Following consideration of this report and the recommended amendments, the Manager will make the amendments, where considered
appropriate. Amendments will be placed on public display for a 4 week period.
3
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
SECTION 2: SUBMISSIONS AND OBSERVATIONS RECEIVED
70 no. submissions and observations were submitted to the Planning Department of Meath County Council with respect to the Draft Trim
Development Plan. The Planning Department welcomes the number of submissions and observations received which highlights the significant
level of public interest in the plan-making process. The submissions can be broken down into 12 main categories as illustrated in the Table
below:
Issues raised in submissions received
Retail Land Use Zoning
2
Transportation Objectives
20
Record of Protected Structures
5
Residential Land Use Zoning
15
General Issues
8
Employment & Industrial Zoning
2
Recreation & Amenities
5
Heritage, Flora & Fauna
4
Town Centre
5
Education
2
Mix Use Land Use Zoning
1
Tourism
1
Total no. of submissions
70
Each individual submission was considered as illustrated in the assessment below:
1.
National Roads Authority, St Martin’s House, Waterloo Rd, Dublin 4
Summary
The NRA commends the Councils in regard to the sustainable and integrated approach to transportation included in the Draft Plan. The
Authority acknowledges the objectives and policies included in the Draft Plan with regard to the proposed Dublin Outer Orbital Road (DOOR)
and advises that it is currently awaiting a Ministerial decision and the resolution of funding issues regarding this project. The Authority also
advises that the project is separate from Transport 21.
4
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Recommendation
The points raised by the NRA are noted and welcomed. The written statement of the plan should be amended to reflect the current status of
the DOOR.
2.
Mr F.G. Kenny, High Street, Trim, Co. Meath
Summary
Mr Kenny states he did not receive official notification that his premises at High Street, Trim, was being included on the Draft Record of
Protected Structures. He states he has no objection to the front façade of the building being protected but he does object to any other part of
the building being protected. He states that “over the years the back of the building has been totally reconstructed with permission from the
Council” and that there is no justifiable reason for its inclusion as a protected structure. No map, street number or description of the building
appears to have been supplied with the submission.
Recommendation
The Planning Department have a letter of notification which is signed by Mr. Kenny which demonstrates that he did receive official notification
that his premises was proposed to be included in the Record of Protected Structures (RPS).
The Conservation Officer disagrees with the sentiments of this submission and opposes the exclusion of this structure from the RPS. This
submission refers to RPS ID No. TT036-018, Trim Medical Centre, High Street. NIAH Reg. Ref: 14328052 – rated of regional importance and
recommended by the Minister for the Environment Heritage and Local Government for addition to the RPS. The Planning Department concurs
with the recommendation of the Minister that this building be included as a Protected Structure in the Record of Protected Structures contained
in the Development Plan. Furthermore, the retention of the façade only of a building is no longer considered to be an acceptable manner to
provide for the protection of the built heritage. However, the PA would be amendable to carrying out a full inspection of the property with a view
to providing a declaration for the owner regarding the works he would be able to carry out as exempted development.
3.
Mr Christopher Barry c/o Frank Burke & Assoc. Baldara, Trim Road, Navan, Co. Meath
Summary
This submission relates to lands at Maudlin Cottage, Dublin Road, and Trim. It is stated that the cottage and garden were mainly zoned
residential in the 1996 Trim Development Plan (should read 1995). They remained so in the 2001 Draft Trim Development Plan but were
changed in the adopted 2002 Trim Development Plan when a large area of the garden was zoned F1 allegedly without a resolution of the
members to make such a change. It is contended that this was a mapping error and that the lands should have their original residential zoning
5
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
restored. The submission indicates that the owner is happy for the part of the lands zoned open space in the 1995 Trim Development Plan to
remain so but requests that the original residential zoning included in the 1995 Trim Development Plan and 2001 Draft Trim Development Plan
be restored.
Recommendation
The site in question is situated along the Banks of the River Boyne. By virtue of its location and setting, it is zoned for F1 ‘Open Space. The
site is also adjoining the Candidate SAC along the River Boyne. It is considered that residential development at this location would be injurious
to the landscape, both visually and environmentally.
Furthermore there are sufficient lands zoned within the proposed development plan boundary to accommodate the projected population
increase. The Planning Department does not support the proposed zoning proposal accordingly.
4.
Ann & Patrick Whelan, 1 St Patrick’s Park, Trim, Co. Meath
Summary
This submission expresses concern at the plan to construct a new local road from Emmet Street to the New Town Centre. It is stated that the
road appears to be aligned through open space in the St Patrick’s housing development. It is submitted that the road should be aligned as far
away from the estate as possible, as the open space in question is considered to be of high amenity value to the residents of the estate. It is
also requested that the Development Plan includes reference to the need for a 2 metre high plastered wall along this proposed road.
Recommendation
The proposed road linking Emmet Street to the New Town Centre is a specific objective of the Trim Town Centre Local Area Plan adopted in
2004. The provision of this road will be subject to the requirements of Part VIII of the Planning & Development Regulations 2001. Detailed
drawings will be prepared which will illustrate detailed road alignments etc. and members of the public have an opportunity to make a
submission or observation accordingly.
5.
Annemarie Broderick, Trim (via Email)
Summary
The submission received urges the development of more pedestrian crossings in the town at safe locations where safety is not undermined by
nearby parking or junctions. The Council is urged to consider introducing a weight restriction on Patrick Street perhaps in addition to ramps to
safeguard children.
6
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
The submission continues by requesting that consideration be given to the use of an alternative form of surface in any relocated playground as
the current surface is very unforgiving on young children’s clothes. Examples of where such safe and clean surfaces can be found include
North Circular Road Gate, the Phoenix Park and Westport, Co. Mayo.
The submission also asks that the problem of a shortage of street furniture in Trim be addressed in the Plan. It is stated that more seating, litter
bins and post boxes are badly needed in the town.
In addition to the above, the problem of dog litter is raised and it is contended that this issue does not receive adequate attention from the
Councils. It is requested that a more proactive approach be taken to addressing this issue in the future.
Finally, it is stated that the footpaths along the R161 Navan Road from Hamilton Place require replacement and are currently unsafe for parents
with buggies, and the elderly.
Recommendation
The Planning Department would support additional street furniture, pedestrian crossing at appropriate locations etc. However, the points raised
in the above submission are a matter for the Trim Area Engineer and not the Trim Development Plan.
6.
John Kiely c/o Jarlath Rattigan Design & Project Management Services, Ardbrackan, Kilmessan, Co. Meath
Summary
This submission with attached map relates to TT036-064 “Warehouses at rear of Kielys” on the Proposed Record of Protected Structures. It is
requested the building be removed from the Draft Record. It is stated that the new street, Finnegan’s Way, has halved the site on which this
structure once stood, leaving it very exposed. It is stated that the building has nothing to do with the old Dublin Gate which “is under the pub
and at the end of the mill/warehouse.” It is stated that as there is no water course flowing by it, it cannot be used to show how it worked in the
past. Therefore it is contended that there are better examples of mill buildings around the country. The owner wishes to redevelop the site and
does not want the building listed as a protected structure therefore he requests its removal from the record.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this submission and opposes the exclusion of this structure from the RPS. The building is
constructed on the line of the town wall – a National Monument. It should also be noted that the building is located in the historic core of Trim,
which is an ACA. It is an objective of the Planning Department to preserve the character of the ACA, and “To retain where practical any
7
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
structure which contributes in a positive manner to the character of the ACAs.” As this is a building which would be considered to contribute
positively to the character of the ACA, the owner would not be granted permission for its demolition, save in exceptional circumstances. The
designation of a building as a protected structure does not preclude development by way of extension, alteration, or new buildings or new use
in the grounds provided such changes do not detract from the character or setting of the structure. Furthermore, if this structure is retained as a
protected structure the grant assistance would be available to the owner for necessary conservation works. Therefore it is recommended that
this building be retained as a Protected Structure in the Record of Protected Structures contained in the Development Plan.
7.
Mr John McInerney B.E., Blackfriary, Navangate, Trim, Co. Meath
Summary
The submission received appears to relate to the future development of the Porch Field and car parking proposals and access arrangements.
Reference is made in this regard to Figure 3 of the Draft Trim Development Plan. (It is noteworthy however that Fig. 3 refers to school
enrolment figures.)
Recommendation
There are no proposals in the Development Plan which relate to the development of the Porchfields. However, the relocation of the playground
to the Porchfields would be subject to the requirements of Part VIII of the Planning & Development Regulations 2001 during which members of
the public have an opportunity to make a submission or observation.
8.
Tiros Resources Ltd on behalf of Homex Ltd
Summary
This submission requests that Homex’s former proposal to develop a house building technologies campus at Kilcooley be withdrawn.
Recommendation
This submission is noted.
9.
Lucia & Dominic Alzapiedi, Abbey Lane, Trim, Co. Meath
Summary
The submission refers to the perceived impact that some of the pedestrian links proposed for Trim will have on their dwelling, protected
structure TT036-031 located on Abbey Lane beside.
8
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
It is contended that the pedestrian link opening onto Abbey Lane would prove dangerous to pedestrians due to increased traffic flow from High
Street onto the lane. It is suggested that the pedestrian link formerly known as P13 be reviewed as it appears to be infringing on private
property. Questions are also raised as to how parking will be managed on the lane as this is becoming an increasing problem for local
residents. It is also questioned as to how the semi private space next to Nangle’s Castle will be managed, maintained and policed. It is stated
that the Lane is in need of maintenance as it has become overgrown and requires additional public lighting.
Recommendation
The points raised in this submission are noted however, it is considered that they are a matter for the Trim Area Engineer and not the Trim
Development Plan.
10.
Frank Burke & Associates on behalf of Mr Noel Fitzsimons, Kiltoome, Trim, Co Meath
Summary
This submission requests that the lands previously zoned EE4 by Variation 5 of the Trim Development Plan 2002-2008 remain zoned for such
use and that the proposal for these lands to be rezoned as E2 under the Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014 be removed from the plan. It
is stated that contractual agreements were entered into with a third party with respect to the previous zoning and that the proposed change of
zoning could have financial and legal consequences for the land owner. It is also stated that the new proposed zoning has no linkage in land
use terms to the previous zoning. The necessity to include the lands in the catchment of Framework Plan 2 is also disputed.
Recommendation
The points raised in this submission are noted. The Planning Department accepts that proposals have been advanced for the subject lands in
accordance with the EE4 zoning objective. In this regard the Planning Department supports the submission but forward by the landowner to
rezone the subject lands from E2 to a zoning objective similar EE4 which relates to motor industries. This will address the inconsistencies
between proposed zoning objective and the development proposal for the site which have been advanced. However, given the important
location of these lands it will be a perquisite that that the design of any new developments at this location is of high quality innovative
architecture. The Planning will amend the written statement and the land use zoning map accordingly in this regard. However, it is considered
appropriate that these lands remain within the boundary of FP 2 to ensure the co-ordinated and integrated development of this area and the
provision of the necessary social and physical infrastructure.
9
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
11.
Boyne Community School Parent’s Association
Summary
This submission requests that lands zoned to the east of the Boyne Community School be rezoned from G1 ‘To provide for necessary
community, recreational an educational facilities’ to F1 ‘to provide for and improve open spaces for active and passive recreational amenities’.
It is stated that the lands are currently in use as playing pitches and that the school authorities have invested considerably in the lands for the
purposes of playing pitches. It is the view of the Parent’s Association that the relevant lands should not be used for any purpose other than as
sport fields for the benefit of Boyne Community School, and any other body within the town of Trim who satisfies the reasonable requirements
of the Board of Management of the school in relation to access to the subject lands.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this submission. It is considered that the zoning objective should remain as G1 to facilitate the
provision of adequate education facilities to cater for the existing and future needs of the town. However, it is considered that play pitches etc
which would be provided with any future school on this site should be made available for use by the wider community. It is noted from the
submission from the Dept. of Education and Science that they would be willing to make school facilities available for community and
recreational use subject to priority of school use and other basic conditions.
12.
Frank Burke and Associates on behalf of Donal and Tom Canty
Summary
The submission relates to lands at Commons and Shanlothe on the Summerhill Road. It is requested that the proposed land use be
designated for the purposes of a Framework Plan to include both residential and community zonings and that the proposed specific objective to
provide a burial ground on the lands be removed and replaced with an designation to provide for educational facilities with enabling residential
development.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support the proposal. There remains an excessive amount of residentially zoned land in Trim in relation to
the quantum of residentially lands that is to be accommodated as per Table 6 of the Meath County Development Plan. The yield of remaining
undeveloped and uncommitted residential land is conservatively estimated at in excess of 6141, twice the amount that is reasonably required to
meet the household projection. Therefore, there are sufficient lands zoned within the proposed development plan boundary to accommodate
the projected population increase. and therefore do not consider it appropriate to zone additional lands for residential purposes as proposed in
this submission.
10
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Furthermore the PA does not support the landowners proposals to remove the objective to provide a burial ground on the lands. St. Loman’s
Cemetery off the Kinnegad Road is nearing capacity and has little room for expansion. The Planning Department therefore recognises the
need to reserve an appropriate site for a burial ground. It is therefore not recommended to remove this objective on foot of this submission.
The Planning Department acknowledges however, that having regard to the extent of lands zoned for G1 ‘community use’ at this location, the
subject lands could also have the potential to accommodate a primary school. It is considered appropriate that a specific zoning objective be
attached on these lands in this regard. The Planning Department proposes to amend the written statement and maps accordingly.
13.
Tommy Murray, Meath Writer’s Circle, Summerhill Rd., Trim
Summary
This submission requests that provision be made in the Draft Trim Development Plan for a theatre or meeting place to accommodate reading
and exhibitions.
Recommendation
The comments raised in this submission are noted. The PA recognizes the need in Trim in for a multi functional community hall/ theatre. This is
reflected in the specific objective in the plan ‘SOC OBJ 8’ which is ‘To facilitate the provision of a multi–functional community hall / theatre in a,
prominent, central and accessible location.’
14.
Suzanne Curran, Blackfriary, Trim
Summary
This submission relates to a dwelling house off the Dunderry Road. The submission makes reference to the proposed zoning of a dwelling
house for ‘small and medium industries of a local type’. It is requested that it is designated residential as it has been so used since its original
construction.
Recommendation
The Planning Department has no objection to the rezoning of the subject lands from E1 to A1 use as proposed. An A1 zoning objective is
reflective of the existing use on site and will ensure the future protection of existing residential amenities. The Planning Department supports
the proposal and proposes to amend the land use zoning map accordingly.
11
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
15.
Patrick Pryle, 15 Castleview, Athlumney
Summary
This submission requests that the Gaol on Mill Street be restored as a museum to respect and honour past generations who were suppressed
or murdered.
Recommendation
The Planning Department notes this submission. However, this issue is not considered to be a matter for the Trim Development Plan.
16.
Declan Clabby and Associates on behalf of Thomas Sheridan.
Summary
This submission requests the zoning of lands comprises of 3.5 acres (1.43ha) at Scurlockstown, Trim for the purposes of E2 ‘Light industrial
use’ use. It is stated that the proposed rezoning would include a buffer zone to the back of the existing dwelling and would take the form or a
raised berm which would be planted with trees and shrubs to screen the Business Park from the rear of the dwelling. A notional layout is also
submitted in support of this submission. A map is included as part of this submission.
Recommendation
The Planning Department acknowledges the merits of this proposal. The extension of the zoning in a westerly direction would allow for the
orderly expansion and development of the Business Park if required over the lifetime of the Plan. However, the E2 zoning objective should
extend only as far as the existing access road to ensure the protection of adjoining residential amenities. The Planning Department therefore
supports the proposal and proposes to amend the land use zoning map accordingly.
17.
Submission by Christopher Flynn and Associates Ltd. on behalf of Mr. James Reynolds, Butterstream gardens, Kildalkey
Road, Trim.
Summary
This submission requests the rezoning of lands at Butterstream Gardens. The submission relates to two plots of land which are currently
zoned. A2 and G1, 0.665ha and 0.5697ha respectively. The submission requests that Meath County Council swaps the zoning of the
residentially zoned lands to the west of the access road with the lands zoned G1 to the east of the access road. The residentially zoned lands
are adjacent to Mr. Reynolds private residence and he wishes to use these lands for a garden and has no intention of developing these lands
12
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
for residential use. It is also contented that the lands zoned G1 would be more suited to residential use as they can be accessed from the
existing estate entrance and can connect to all public services contained within this road. A map is attached as part of this submission.
Recommendation
The Planning Department supports the proposed rezonings as it should facilitate the timely release of residential and community zoned lands.
It should be noted also, that the proposed rezoning will not result in a net increase of residentially zoned lands. The Planning Department
therefore recommends that the land use zoning map be amended accordingly.
18.
Submission by Christopher Flynn and Associates Ltd. On behalf of the Reynolds Family
Summary
This submission requests that lands located at Corporationland 3rd Division and Crowpark 1st Division be included in the development plan
envelope and be zoned for a residential zoning. Maps are attached as part of this submission.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this submission. It is the opinion of the Planning Department that there are sufficient lands zoned
within the proposed development plan boundary to accommodate the projected population increase and the allocated no. of households as per
Table 6 of the Meath County Development Plan. Therefore do not consider it appropriate to zone additional lands for residential purposes as
proposed in this submission. Additional residential zoning at this location would militate against the objective to achieve a compact urban
settlement and be contrary to the principles of sustainable development. It is therefore not recommended to amend the Draft Plan on foot of this
submission.
19.
Submission by Frank Burke and Associates on behalf of Phyllis Kiely of Clonfane House, Trim.
Summary
This submission relates to lands zoned for G1 use off the Dublin Road at Iffernock included as part of FP 5. The landowner requests that the
proposed zoning remains but the scale of the educational campus be reduced from 8 acres to 4 acres and that provision for a school site only
be made if the Department of Education agrees that it is needed.
Recommendation
An educational campus of 8 acres is required at this location to facilitate the provision of 2 no. primary schools. This is confirmed by the
submission made by the Department of Education and Science on the Draft Plan which states that ‘it is prudent to continue the proposed
13
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
reservation of 8 acres for 2 no. primary schools on the area identified as FP5’. Accordingly, the Planning Department does not support this
proposal.
20.
Submission by Declan Clabby and Associates on behalf of Gerard Reilly.
Summary
This submission relates to lands at Iffernock in the ownership of Mr. Reilly currently zoned for D1 use. It is stated that this portion of land is
currently unused and at present is overgrown and as a result has become subject to anti-social behaviour, vandalism and dumping. It is
requested that these lands be zoned for A2 use and in support of this it is stated that services would be available from the Maudlin Housing
Development located north of the subject lands and that the estate road is abutting the boundary of the site.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this proposal. It is the opinion of the Planning Department that there are sufficient lands zoned for
residential purposes within the proposed development plan boundary to accommodate the projected population increase. It is recommended
that the D1 zoning objective be retained on the subject lands.
21.
Submission by Douglas Wallace Architects on behalf of Shannon Homes Ltd.
Summary
This submission relates to 1.3ha of lands at Blackfriary to the west of the relief road currently zoned for F1 ‘Open space’. It is contested that this
and was left over from the re-alignment of the roadway and that it is therefore under-used and is not likely to be valued, maintained and
contribute to the open space strategy within the town. It is requested that this land be re-zoned from F1 to low density residential development
with an open space opening out to the roadway. A map with an indicative residential layout is submitted in support of this submission.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support the proposal put forward in this submission. It is the opinion of the Planning Department that there
are sufficient lands zoned for residential purposes within the proposed development plan boundary to accommodate the projected population
increase. It is therefore recommended that the existing zoning objective F1 be retained on the subject lands.
14
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
22.
Submission from Liam McGree and Associates Limited on behalf of Billy Farrelly Moatlands House, Navan.
Summary
This submission makes reference to lands at Oaktree Business Park which are zoned for E1 use ‘to provide for industrial and related uses
subject to the provision of necessary physical infrastructure’. It is stated that the landowner has very ambitious plans for the development of a
high quality Business Park to include retail warehousing, offices ,car showroom, crèches, hotel (incl. health and fitness centre), petrol station
and restaurant/drive through and that some of these proposals would not be possible under the current zoning. It is requested that the lands be
rezoned to B1 use ‘to protect and enhance the special physical and social character of the existing town and village centres and to provide for
new and improved town centre facilities and uses’. A map illustrating layouts and detailing proposed uses is included as part of this
submission.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support the proposal put forward in this submission. The proposed uses are non compatible with the
existing established uses in Oaktree Business Park and would therefore result in haphazard, piecemeal and non integrated development.
Furthermore to rezone the lands as proposed for B1 ‘town centre’ use would adversely impact upon the vitality and viability of the commercial
core.
23.
Submission from Frank Burke and Associates on behalf of Pierce and Anne Murphy
Summary
This submission refers to Trim Hardware premises on Emmet Street and the perceived negative impact of the road proposals on this property.
Particular reference is made to INF OBJ 3 which states that it is an objective of the Town Council to ensure the completion of a new link road
connecting Castle St. through Emmet St. to an area north of St. Patrick’s park in accordance with the Trim Town Centre local Area Plan. It is
stated that ‘the proposed land take associated with the proposed road extension, will result in the effective closure of the business in question,
in that the disruption and associated disturbance arising from the works together with the size of the site after the land take will mean that the
business will not be able to operate during construction and post construction the retained site will not be sufficient in size to meet the needs of
the hardware operation’.
The need for the road link is contested and it is requested that this road objective be deleted from the Trim
Development Plan 2008-2014.
Recommendation
The proposed road linking Emmet Street to the New Town Centre is a specific objective of the Trim Town Centre Local Area Plan adopted in
2004. The provision of this road will be subject to the requirements of Part VIII of the Planning & Development Regulations 2001. Detailed
15
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
drawings will be prepared which will illustrate detailed road alignments etc. and members of the public have an opportunity to make a
submission or observation accordingly. Furthermore, it should also be noted that there are lands specifically identified in the Draft
Development Plan to facilitate the relocation of non compatible town centre uses to the outskirts of the town.
24.
Submission by Christina Donoghue and Joergen Alveen, Millbrook House
Summary
The submission received expresses great interest and pleasure in reading the Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014, especially regarding
the future plans for improvements to the existing road network and the construction of a local distributor road around the outskirts of Trim which
would divert heavy traffic out of Trim. However, concern is expressed in relation to the road structure of the Dublin road and the increase of
traffic and number of heavy trucks and speeding cars on this road. It is requested that the plan includes commitments regarding traffic
management in the form of better speeding controls and diversion of heavy trucks away from the Dublin Road. In this regard it is also
requested that the plan includes safety measures for pedestrians along the Dublin Road with footpaths along both sides reducing the need to
cross over. It is stated that a traffic light controlled pedestrian crossing should be established outside the Boyne Community College for safe
road crossing.
Recommendation
This submission is noted and welcomed. However, the points raised in this submission are a matter for the Trim Area Engineer and not the
Trim Development Plan.
25.
Submission by Christopher Barry, The Cottage Maudlins, Trim
Summary
This submission makes reference to the Dublin Road between the roundabout at Knightsbrook and the roundabout at Maudlins. Concern is
expressed in relation to the number of HGV’s on this road. It is requested that an alterative route for trucks be provided via Laracor and
Scurlockstown.
Recommendation
The points raised in this submission are a matter for the Trim Area Engineer and not the Trim Development Plan.
16
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
26.
Submission by Katherine Duffy, 13 Oakdeem Killiney, Co. Dublin
Summary
This submission refers to 50 acres in the ownership by Ms. Duffy which forms part of FP 1. Reference is made to the designation of these
lands for the purposes of a LAP under the current Trim Development Plan and disappointment and frustration is expressed with regard to this
LAP process. However, the landowner states 100% commitment and support to the current draft FP1 Framework Plan which has been
prepared by Planning Consultants Douglas-Wallace and Infrastructure Engineers DBFL. It is stated however, that to make the framework plan
commercially viable it is necessary to increase the allocated number of residential units for the Phase 1 development and remove any burden
relating to the RT1 link road from the Framework Plan.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this submission. There remains an excessive amount of residentially zoned land in Trim in relation
to the quantum of residentially lands that is to be accommodated as per Table 6 of the Meath County Development Plan. The yield of remaining
undeveloped and uncommitted residential land is conservatively estimated at in excess of 6141, twice the amount that is reasonably required to
meet the household projection. To increase the number of residential units to be provided in phase 1 would be contrary to the Order of Priority
included in the Plan.
Furthermore, an increase in the allocated number of residential units in phase 1 cannot be supported due to the household allocation proposed
for the town as per Table 6 of the Meath County Development Plan, the absence of critical social and physical infrastructure which other
residential lands may release.
However, it should be noted that the Planning Department will monitor the progress of the Development Plan and are required to carry out a
progress report after 2 years of it being adopted. Furthermore the Order of Priority prescribed in the Plan will be reviewed on an annual basis.
This review will assess the release of zoned residential lands and if considered appropriate unit allocations may be revised at this stage.
Furthermore, it is critical that the development of this area is linked to RT1 including the Bridge over the Boyne given the traffic movements
which will be generated in this area as a result of FP 1.
27.
Submission by Les Meldrun on behalf of Blackfriary Services Company
Summary
This submission includes a Draft Framework Plan for the Blackfriary lands. This draft strategy includes a Land Use Strategy, Urban Design
Framework and Urban Design Principles.
17
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Recommendation
The content of this submission is noted. However, the Planning Department will require a revised Framework Plan which complies with the
policies and objectives prescribed in the Trim Development Plan.
28.
Submission by Alan Hora and Tom Hora, Loughglynn Development Ltd., Rathvale House, Athboy Co. Meath
Summary
This submission relates to 37 acres in the ownership of Loughglynn Developments at Peterstown Trim which form part of the proposed
Blackfriary Framework Plan, FP1. It is stated that they are committed to the development of FP1 and would expect that the majority of the
social and physical infrastructure (including a school campus site) be available for use within 6 months of the Framework Plan being adopted.
Reference is made to a LAP document which was prepared by the landowner’s for the subject lands and previously submitted to Meath County
Council for approval. Disappointment is expressed by the landowners at the proposal in the Draft Trim Development Plan to designate the
subject lands for the purposes of a Framework Plan. However, it is stated that in light of the new requirement for a Framework Plan the
landowners have immediately appointed architectural consultants to prepare a Framework Plan for Blackfriary. It is stated that the Framework
Plan would be submitted to Meath County Council immediately upon adoption of the 2008-2014 Development Plan. The landowners request
that additional housing units be allocated to the Framework Area as part the Order of Priority and that the provision of the link road between the
Navan and Dublin Roads be removed from the requirements of the Framework Plan. It is also requested that Meath County Council allocate
the necessary staff resources to deal with FP 1.
Recommendation
As per recommendation no. 26.
29.
Submission by the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources
Summary
This submission states that ‘the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources have no comments to make at this time’ in
relation to the Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014.
Recommendation
The comments made in this submission are noted.
18
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
30.
Submission by John Spain and Associates on behalf of Cusack Homes Ltd.
Summary
This submission seeks the rezoning of lands at Iffernock from D1 ‘to provide for visitor/ tourist accommodation and leisure facilities’ to an A2
residential zoning objective, the aim of which is to provide for ‘new residential communities and community facilities and to protect existing
residential areas’. The submission refers to the 28 holiday homes recently constructed on the subject lands which were granted under Plan.
Reg. Ref. TA 40550. It is stated that despite considerable effort to market and sell the units as holiday homes, it has been unsuccessful to date
as there is extremely limited demand for this type of unit at this location. It is contested that the zoning of these lands for A2 use will allow the
use of these units for private residential purposes, which in turn will contribute to the council’s housing stock.
Recommendation
It is the opinion of the Planning Department that there is sufficient lands zoned within the proposed development plan boundary to
accommodate the projected population increase and therefore do not consider it appropriate to increase the housing stock. Furthermore, to
rezone the lands as proposed would establish an undesirable future precedent throughout the County and as such would be contrary to proper
planning and development.
31.
Submission by Cllr. Peter Higgins
Summary
This submission requests that all areas of public open space in housing developments be delineated in green to ensure they are reserved free
from development.
Recommendation
The Planning Department would support this proposal. The written statement and maps will be amended accordingly.
32.
Submission by Johns Spain Associates on behalf of Cusack Homes Ltd. Heritage Kitchens Ltd, Seamus Murphy (Securitech)
and Trimproof Ltd..
Summary
This submission seeks the rezoning of lands from C1 ‘to provide for and facilitate mixed residential and business uses un existing mixed use
central business areas’ to B1 ‘to protect and enhance the special physical and social character of existing town and village centres and to
provide for new and improved town centre facilities and uses’. It is stated that the zoning of the subject lands to a B1 objective will assist the
19
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
town’s development as a sustainable, compact community through the provision of increased retail provision in close proximity to the
designated town centre. It is contented that the development of these lands for B1 use would 1) provide a logical extension to Trim Town
Centre, 2) positively facilitate the redevelopment and extension to the Castle Arch Hotel and enable the regeneration of the key quarter of the
Town Centre, 3) allow for appropriately scaled retail units (in excess of 200 sq.m.) at this location, which would provide an adequate
commercial incentive for the existing inappropriate uses to be relocated elsewhere.
Recommendation
The Planning Department is opposed to this proposal as it conflicts with the policies and objectives prescribed in the Trim Local Area Plan
which provides for the extension of the town centre in a westerly direction to the lands to the rear of Emmet St.
33.
Submission by Edward Wall on behalf of Bridget Wall no. 1 Watergate St.
Summary
This submission objects to the inclusion of no. 1 Watergate St. in the Record of Protected Structures. (RPS ID No. TT036-045, Terraced twobay two-storey painted brick house c. 1910.Segmental-arched door openings with overlights, stone steps and chamfered brick door surrounds.
NIAH REG NO. 14328077). The grounds for objection are on the basis that a recent neighbouring development has undermined the traditional
character of the area.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this proposal. It should be noted that Mrs Wall’s house is one of a terrace of four matching houses,
and to remove this dwelling from the RPS while protecting the other three, would be inequitable. Furthermore, the erection of a building which
Mrs Wall considers inappropriate to the character of the area, adjacent to her house, does not negate the fact that the house in question is
rated of Regional importance and recommended by the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government for addition to the RPS.
It should also be noted that the building is located in an ACA. It is an objective of the Planning Department to preserve the character of the
ACA, and “To retain where practical any structure which contributes in a positive manner to the character of the ACAs.” As this is a building
which would be considered to contribute positively to the character of the ACA, the owner would not be granted permission for its demolition,
save in exceptional circumstances. Furthermore, if this structure is designated as a protected structure the owner could possible avail of grant
assistance for any necessary conservation works. The Planning Department therefore concurs with the Minister’s recommendation to include
this building on the RPS and therefore recommends that it is retained as such in the Trim Development Plan.
20
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
34.
Submission by Christina Donoghue and Joergen Alveen, Millbrook House, Dublin Rd., Trim
Summary
This submission requests that the extent of the Special Area of Conservation (SAC) designation associated with the River Boyne be amended
to exclude part of property associated with Millbrook House i.e. Dwelling house, patio, garage and tarmacadam area. It is also requested that
the SAC designation be extended to contend all off the Porch field.
Recommendation
SAC’s are prime wildlife conservation areas in the country, considered to be important on a European as well as Irish level. The legal basis on
which SACs are selected and designated is the EU Habitats Directive, transposed into Irish law in the European Union (Natural Habitats)
Regulations, 1997 as amended in 1998 and 2005. SAC designation is a matter for the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local
Government at the national level and it is not the remit of the Councils under the Development Plan review. Accordingly, it is not recommended
to amend the Draft Plan on foot of this submission.
35.
Submission by Brian O’ Connell, Development Areas Unit, Department of Education and Science
Summary
This submission acknowledges the proposed level of sites reserved for educational facilities as part of this Plan i.e. Framework Plan 1 has a
reservation for a 4 acres site for a primary school; and a 12 acre suite for a post-primary school. Framework Plan 2 (FP 2) has a reservation for
a 4 acre primary school and Framework Plan 5 has a reservation of 8 acres for the purpose of an educational campus providing for 2 no.
primary schools including the relocation of the Gaelscoil. It is stated that the Department is satisfied with the proposed level of site reservations
as part of the Plan provided and that the land in the ownership of the Department adjacent to Boyne Community School be available for
development/location of a primary school in the future. It is requested that the exiting G1 zoning be retained to allow for the development of a
primary school and for improving access to Boyne Community School as well as traffic management in the area. It is stated that if the zoning on
this land is amended to exclude the possibility of development of a school then the Department will have no alternative but to place the land for
sale on the open market to realise some funding towards the land that the Department will have to purchase as an alternative. It is indicated
also that while the provision of lands for community and recreational purposes is not a primary function of the Department of Education and
Science, it is willing to make school facilities available for community and recreational use subject to priority of school use and to other basic
conditions.
It is stated that the Department’s preference is to relocate the Gaelscoil to the land adjoining the Boyne Community School within the next 2
years. Furthermore, it is also intended to provide a primary school in the short term on a green field site to allow for the relocation of St. Mary’s
21
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
NS and St. Michael’s BNS and that FP 1 lands are the preferred location. It is stated however, that access would be required to essential
services and infrastructure.
The Department welcomes the proposed reservation of a 12 acres site for a new post-primary in FP 1 however, states that as it is not
envisaged that the need for this school to arise until towards the end of the Development Plan it may be unrealistic to restrict commencement of
the proposed 399 units as part of Phase 1 of the development in this area.
The Department also considers it prudent to continue the proposed reservation of 8 acres for 2 no. primary schools on the area identified as FP
5 to cater for the future expansion of Trim.
Recommendation
The Planning Department support the Department’s proposal to retain the existing zoning on their lands adjacent to St. Michael’s for G1
community facilities as this will facilitate the provision of adequate educational facilities to serve the existing and future population of Trim.
Furthermore, the PA welcome the Department’s proposal to make school facilities available for community and recreational uses. The
Planning Department notes the concerns of the Department with respect to FP 1 and the phasing of development but advises that the schools
sites shall be provided in tandem with the 1st phase of residential development (as opposed to prior) which includes 399 units.
36.
Submission by Ettie Gormley , Dublin Road, Trim, Co. Meath
Summary
This submission objects to the inclusion of the premises know as ‘Lynch’s (in the proposed Record of Protected Structures. i.e. RPS ID No:
TT036-070, Terraced three-bay two-storey house c.1860, in use as shop and end-of-terrace three-bay two-storey house, built c.1870. It is
stated that the property was originally a bungalow and not a two storey property dating back to 1870. They do not believe the building to be of
architectural importance.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support the proposal put forward in this submission. This structure forms part of a set terrace of dwellings.
These modest houses were proposed for protection because of the positive contribution they make to the streetscape. It is the view of the
Planning Department that the demolition of this structure would be detrimental to the character of the street and that it should be included in the
Record of Protected Structures. Furthermore, it is the view of the Planning Department that the fact that a building has been altered in the past
does not necessarily negate its interest or importance. Therefore it is recommended that this building be retained on the Record of Protected
Structures contained in the Development Plan.
22
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
37.
Submission by Gaelscoil na Boinne
Summary
This submission outlines the concerns of the Board of Management with regard to the current premises occupied by Gaelscoil na Boinne.
Facilities for pupils and staff are considered to be inadequate and safety is also expressed as a concern. It is requested that the issues of the
provision of new purpose build accommodation be addressed by the relevant authorities.
Recommendation
The comments made in this submission are noted. The Trim Draft Development Plan identifies a number of sites which will facilitate the
relocation of the Gaelscoil to a more appropriate location and premises.
38.
Submission by John Spain and Associates on behalf of Potterton Livestock Auctions Ltd., and the JTG partnership
Summary
This submission seeks the realignment of the link road which separates the proposed A2 zoned lands and G1 at the former Potterton Sales
Yard. It is requested that this route be realigned further to the south in line with the landowner’s current landholding boundary in the interest of
maximising the development potential of these lands. Consequently an extension of the proposed A2 zoned residential lands to the north in a
southerly direction, to follow the alignment of the link road is also sought. It is stated that this revised alignment was previously agreed with the
Roads Department of Meath County Council as part of its pre-application discussions under Reg. Ref. TA/70694.
It is stated that an Action Area Plan was agreed (but not adopted) for the lands at Manorlands and the re-alignment of the link road would also
be in line with the urban design guidance set out in this draft document.
It is contended that as a result of the proposed alignment the link road a section of G1 zoned lands with severely restricted development
potential would be created and the development of community facilities on an isolated strip of land, only accessible across a busy link road is
also not in line with the principles of good urban design. A map is included as part of this submission.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this submission. As stated previously there are sufficient lands zoned for residential use within the
Development Plan boundary to accommodate predicated population growth over the lifetime of the Development Plan.
23
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
39.
Submission by John Spain and Associates on behalf of Keegan Quarries Ltd.
Summary
This submission relates to lands at Newtown between the Navan and Dublin Roads. It is stated that the landowner welcomes the zoning of a
section of the overall landholding as Objective A5 which will contribute in some part towards the sustainable development of these lands and
the delivery of the proposed distributor road. The purpose of this submission is to seek the reconfiguration of the zoning objectives covering
some of these lands and the partial realignment of the proposed relief/distributor road (RT1) linking the Dublin Road to the Navan Road at
Newtown, further to the east.
It is submitted that the zoning of the western portion of the lands as objective E2 is inappropriate due to the proximity to established residential
development and it is requested that these lands be rezoned to A5 residential use. It is stated that the rezoning of these lands as so would
facilitate the removal of the buffer zones thus, maximising the development potential of the subject lands.
It is also contested that the access to the proposed Objective E2 zoned lands for the Newtown Road is inappropriate due to the poor alignment
of the road, the resultant sightlines and the proximity to existing residential dwellings to the north-west.
It is also requested that the alignment of the distributor road be realigned eastwards to include a greater proportion of Keegan’s overall
landholding and that the subject land be zoned under an E2 zoning objective or a suitable G1 and residential zoning. It is stated that the zoning
of these lands would provide for the required 4 acre school site and deliver a sufficient quantum of zoned residential land to ensure the
economic viability of delivering the proposed distributor road.
It is submitted that the rezoning of the western portion of the subject lands for residential uses would allow for the development of small scale
retail development to serve both the existing and future residential areas at a more sustainable and accessible location. Maps are included as
part of this submission.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support the proposal to further extend the Development Plan boundary eastwards. There remains an
excessive amount of residentially zoned land in Trim in relation to the quantum of residentially lands that is to be accommodated as per Table 6
of the Meath County Development Plan. The yield of remaining undeveloped and uncommitted residential land is conservatively estimated at in
excess of 6141, twice the amount that is reasonably required to meet the household projection. Therefore, there are sufficient lands zoned
within the proposed development plan boundary to accommodate the projected population increase. Furthermore, to extend the development
plan boundary eastwards would militate against the objective to achieve a compact urban settlement and be contrary to principles of
24
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
sustainable development. It is also considered that the proposed access arrangements to serve the E2 from the spur off the distributor road are
adequate.
40.
Submission by Development Applications Unit, DoEHLG
Summary
This submission refers to the Environmental Report, Strategic Environmental Assessment report. It is stated that the SEA does not contain an
appropriate assessment of the impact of the plan on the cSAC. In this regard particular reference is made to the potential impact of the
southern by pass, water abstraction, discharge of waste water, developments impacting on floor plain storage and increased amenity use. It is
also recommended that monitoring indicators for this plan should include measurements of the loss of biodiversity and water quality
measurements.
Recommendation
The comments made in this submission are noted and the SEA will be re-examined in this context.
41.
Submission by John Spain and Associates on behalf of South-West Partnership
Summary
This submission refers to lands to the south west of Trim Town Centre. The subject lands are zoned in the Draft Development Plan for E2 use.
It is requested that the northern section of the subject site be rezoned under a C1 zoning objective to allow for the development of a discount
food store. It is submitted that this site presents an appropriate location for a discount food store due to site assembly issues and the historical
nature of the town centre militating against a site closer to the town. A realignment of the proposed distributor road through the south of the
subject site to the boundary of the subject site is also sought to maintain the development potential of the landholding. A consequential
extension of the E2 zoned lands, to follow the new road alignment is also sought.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this proposal. It is considered appropriate that the E2 zoning objective be retained to ensure that
sufficient lands are identified in the Plan to accommodate employment generating uses. Furthermore, to permit a discount food store at this
location could have the potential to adversely impact upon the vitality and viability of the town’s commercial core.
25
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
42.
Submission by Ann and Padraig Doyle, Longwood Road, Trim
Summary
This submission objects to the location of the proposed roundabout at the junction of the Longwood Road and the proposed new outer road. It
is contested that the proposed roundabout and road would present a danger for access to Mr and Mrs Doyle’s dwelling.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this submission. It is not considered that the proposed roundabout will not pose problems for
access to Mr. and Mr Doyle’s dwelling. Furthermore, it should be noted that the location of the reservation corridor and roundabout is indicative
and will be subject to a Part 8 at which stage a detailed design will be prepared and members of the public will get an opportunity to make a
submission.
43.
Submission by Philip and Marie Lacy, 13 St. Patrick’s Park
Summary
This submission refers to the proposed link road from Emmet St. to the area identified as the town centre extension area. Concern is
expressed in relation to the proposed road from Emmet St. Impact on residential amenities associated with the existing property is raised. It is
requested that the council and planners carefully consider siting/building the road through the new town centre from Market St, as opposed to
the rear of St. Patrick’s Park. It is also requested that provision be made in the plan for an appropriately constructed concrete block wall
boundary of at least two metres high to the rear of the town blocks of houses numbers 1 to 10 and numbers 11 to 20.
Recommendation
The proposed road linking Emmet Street to the New Town Centre is a specific objective of the Trim Town Centre Local Area Plan adopted in
2004. The provision of this road will be subject to the requirements of Part VIII of the Planning & Development Regulations 2001. Detailed
drawings will be prepared which will illustrate detailed road alignments, details of boundary treatment etc. and members of the public have an
opportunity to make a submission or observation accordingly.
26
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
44.
Submission by Gabrielle Hussey, no. 8 St. Patrick’s Park
Summary
This submission refers to the proposed link road from Emmet St. to the area identified as the town centre extension area. Concern is
expressed in relation to the proximity of the road to no. 8 St. Patrick’s Park and the impact of the proposed road on existing residential
amenities enjoyed by Ms. Hussey.
Recommendation
As per recommendation no. 43 above.
45.
Submission by Gerard McGing, 29 St. Patrick’s Park
Summary
This submission refers to the proposed link road from Emmet St. to the area identified as the town centre extension area. Concern is
expressed in relation to the proximity of the road to no. 29 St. Patrick’s Park and the impact of the proposed road on existing residential
amenities enjoyed by Mr. Mc.Ging. It is requested that no traffic would come through St. Patrick’s Park and that any future development to the
rear of dwelling houses 1-20 St. Patrick’s Park would consist of low level housing.
Recommendation
As per recommendation no. 43 above.
46.
Submission by Michael Halligan, Planning Consultant on behalf of Bligh family, Glebe Golf Club, Dunlever, Trim
Summary
This submission refers to the Glebe Golf Club located off the Kildalkey Road to the north west of Trim. The subject lands extend to 57.1ha in
area. It is requested that the lands be zoned subject to a D1 objective ‘to provide for visitor and tourist accommodation and leisure facilities’. It
is considered that such a zoning objective would recognise the existing leisure use of the subject lands and optimise the contribution of these
lands to the balanced growth of Trim, maximising the potential of these lands to further develop as a major integrated tourism and leisure
facility. A map is included as part of this submission.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support the proposal put forward in this submission. The subject lands are far removed from the proposed
Draft Development Plan envelope and would represent undesirable ‘leap frogging’ of development. However, the Planning Department contend
27
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
that the tourism potential of these lands would be assessed on their own merits and the Planning Department have adopted a positive attitude
to such proposals in the past without the lands being zoned for a particular use.
47.
Submission by Bridget Walsh, 14 St. Patrick’s Park
Summary
This submission refers to the proposed link road from Emmet St. to the area identified as the town centre extension area. Concern is
expressed in relation to the impact of the proposed wall on existing residential amenities of the area and the impact of the existing area of open
space adjacent to St. Patrick’s Park. Ms. Walsh requests that she is informed of any new development proposals in the area.
Recommendation
As per recommendation no 43.
48.
Submission by Trim Town Council and the Trim Area Elected Members of Meath County Council
Summary
A number of issues were raised in this submission in relation to various elements of the Draft Plan as detailed below.
i.
It is requested that the Medical Practice on High Street be retained on the Record of Protected Structures but that the façade only of the
building be protected.
ii.
It is requested that the proposals for the link road from Emmet St. to the town centre would include a suitable boundary (preferably a
wall) to protect the residential amenities of the residents of St. Patrick’s Park.
iii.
It is requested that land at Kiltome, south of the Navan road be rezoned and be subject to and EE4 zoning objective.
iv.
It is requested that the lands adjacent to Boyne Community School currently zoned G1 be rezoned for F1 use.
v.
It is requested that lands adjacent to the site identified for the provision of a burial ground be designated for the purposes of a school
site.
vi.
It is requested that the dwelling house located on the Dunderry Road which is included in FP 1 be rezoned for A2 residential use.
28
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
vii.
It is requested that the E2 zoning objective at Scurlockstown be extended westwards in line with the alignment of the existing service
road and that this land be included as part of FP 6.
viii.
It is requested that the zoning of the lands adjacent to the trees at Butterstream gardens be rezoned.
ix.
It is requested that lands at Iffernock be rezoned to A5 ‘low residential’ to form part of Phase 2 of the Order of Priority.
x.
It is requested that lands at Blackfriary be rezoned to A5 ‘low residential’ to form part of Phase 2 of the Order of Priority.
xi.
It is requested that open space within housing estates be subject to an F1 zoning objective.
Recommendation
In response to issue no. i), the Planning Department would not support this proposal as per recommendation no. 2
In response to issues no. ii), please note recommendation to submissions no. 4 etc.,
In response to issue no. iii), the Planning Department supports this proposal as per recommendation no.10
In response to issue no. iv), the Planning Department does not support this proposal as per recommendation no.’s 11, 35, 69
In response to issue no. v), the Planning Department supports this proposal as per recommendation no. 12
In response to issue no. vi) the Planning Department supports this proposal as per recommendation no.14
In response to issue no. vii) the Planning Department supports this proposal as per recommendation no.16
In response to issue no. viii), the Planning Department supports this proposal as per recommendation no. 17
In response to issue no. ix) the Planning Department does not support this proposal as per recommendation no. 20
29
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
In response to issue no. x) the Planning Department does not support this proposal as per recommendation no.21
In response to issue no. xi) the Planning Department supports this proposal as per recommendation no.31
49.
Submission by Sheridan Woods Architects and Urban Planners on behalf of Barr Construction.
Summary
This submission refers to lands at Crowpark. It is requested that these lands be included in the Development Plan boundary and be zoned for
residential development. The subject lands extend to 12.1ha in area and are located approx. 800m to 1,200m from the town centre. It is stated
that discounting ancillary uses within the residential zoned lands, an additional 12.3ha is required to comply with the population targets as
promoted in the NSS and RPGs. It is therefore requested that these lands be zoned for residential/mixed use to meet the shortfall of residential
lands identified and being designated for the purposes of a framework plan. Maps are included as part of this submission.
Recommendation
There are sufficient lands zoned within the proposed development plan envelope to accommodate the projected population increase. Additional
residential zoning would militate against the objective to achieve a compact urban settlement and be contrary to the principles of sustainable
development. The subject site is far removed from the proposed Draft Development Plan envelope and represents ‘leap frogging’. Accordingly,
the Planning Department does not support the proposal but forward in this submission.
50.
Submission by Johns Spain and Associates on behalf of Poppintree Developments Limited, Whitegate Cross, Virginia, Co.
Cavan
Summary
This submission refers to 19ha of lands off the Dublin Road at Iffernock. It is stated that the landowners welcome the proposed B4 zoning
objective in the Draft Trim Development Plan on the subject lands. Reference is also made to a current application TA 70465 on the subject
lands. It is advised that a response to the FI request will be lodged with the Planning Department shortly.
Recommendation
The comments made in this submission are noted.
30
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
51.
Submission by OBK Architects on behalf of CMS Limited
Summary
This submission refers to lands off the Dublin Road i.e. the current site of the Gaelscoil. It is requested that the proposed A2 zoning be
extended to include all lands in the ownership of CMS. It is stated that the current area zoned would be unsustainable to develop. A map is
included as part of this submission.
Recommendation
It is considered appropriate to reserve part of the site for F1 ‘open space’ use given the absence of public open space provision within the
adjoining housing development. Accordingly, the Planning Department does not support this submission.
52.
Submission by Comhaltas Ceoltoiri Eireann
Summary
This submission details the activities of Comhaltas and in particular the Trim Branch. It is requested that provision be made for a teach cheoil
at a suitable location in the town.
Recommendation
It is considered that a teach cheoil could be accommodated at numerous locations throughout the town. Furthermore, the PA recognizes the
need for a multi functional community hall/ theatre in Trim. This is reflected in the specific objective in the plan ‘SOC OBJ 8’ which is ‘To
facilitate the provision of a multi–functional community hall / theatre in a, prominent, central and accessible location.’ A teach cheoil could also
be accommodated in such a facility.
53.
Submission by Trimfold Envelopes Ltd.
Summary
This submission refers to the operations of Trimfold and their current economic position. It is stated that one of the factory units have been
identified as being surplus to requirements and that it is proposed to dispose of it in an effort to provide a stable financial structure for the
company. It is requested that this unit be rezoned to facilitate appropriate retail business on the site in order to maximise the consideration on
disposal and safeguard the overall operation of Trimfold within Trim. A map is submitted as part of this submission.
31
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Recommendation
Trimfold is located within Oakstown Business Park which is zoned for E1 use. It is not considered appropriate to rezone an individual building
within the business park as it would result in piecemeal and non integrated development which would be contrary to the proper planning and
development of the Business Park. However, it should be noted that as per the Zoning Matrix prescribed in Section 3.5 of the Draft
Development Plan a number of varying uses can be accommodated on E1 zoned lands.
54.
Submission by Fr. Andrew Farrell, St. Patrick’s, Trim
Summary
This submission refers to 3 acres of land off the Longwood Road which accommodate Trim Town Soccer Club. It is requested that the road
objective be removed from these lands. It is requested that this objective be removed 1) to make an adequate pitch available to Trim Town
Soccer Club 2) as the road would result in intolerable noise pollution on the edge of a sensitive medical, retirement and perhaps surgical
establishment 3) the sterilisation of this 3 acres by the road will hamper the future extension of this medical and retirement complex.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this submission. This road objective forms part of the local distributor road which will form a key
part of the town’s road infrastructure. The reservation corridor illustrated on the map is indicative only and the provision of this road will be
subject to the requirements of Part VIII of the Planning & Development Regulations 2001. Detailed drawings will be prepared at this stage
which will illustrate detailed road alignments etc. and members of the public will have an opportunity to make a submission or observation
accordingly. Notwithstanding this, a standard size soccer pitch can be accommodated on these lands. However, there are other lands
identified throughout the town for open space for active and passive recreational amenities which could facilitate the relocation of the soccer
club and allow for an extension of the existing facilities if required over the lifetime of the plan.
55.
Submission by Christopher Flynn and Associates Ltd. On behalf of Barry Gillan.
Summary
This submission refers to lands in the ownership of Mr. Gillan at Iffernock, Dublin Road. The subject lands currently accommodate a petrol
station and convenience store, car sales yard and a garage. It is indicated that the landowner wishes to develop the site to include a revised
layout, modernise the existing buildings and extend the retail space and provide ancillary office space. It is requested that the subject lands be
rezoned from A1 residential to an appropriate zoning objective which would facilitate such development.
32
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support the proposal put forward in this submission. To rezone the subject lands for commercial purposes
would facilitate a number of uses which would not be considered appropriate at this location. It is preferable to retain the existing A1 zoning
objective on the site however, any future application will be assessed on its merits and will have regard to the existing established permitted
uses on site. It is also important that the adjoining residential amenities are protected in any future application.
56.
Submission by Cllr Philip Cantwell
Summary
This submission requests that vehicular and pedestrian access be provided from the Summerhill Road to the Manorlands Estate. It is also
requested that a green area be provided for the private sites at Manorlands Estate. Reference is made to proposals for traveller’s
accommodation and it is requested that an alternative site be provided for the proposed houses for travellers rather than the proposal to locate
the halting site on a temporary basis on the lands owned by the HSE. It is also requested that an alternative site for a cemetery be investigated
on the road past St. Loman’s Cemetery.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this submission. The provision of a vehicular and pedestrian access from the Summerhill Road to
the Manorlands Estate will be examined as part of FP 4. With respect to the private sites at Manorlands Estate, the provision of public open
space shall be a matter for individual planning applications. The provision of traveller accommodation is a matter for the Housing Dept. of
Meath County Council and the Planning Department has been advised that proposals are advanced in this regard. The Planning Department
examined alternative sites for the provision cemetery in the vicinity of St. Loman’s Cemetery however, due to the poor road alignment at this
location they were not considered to be appropriate. Accordingly, it is not proposed to amend the Draft Plan on foot of the issues raised in this
submission.
57.
Submission by Manorlands Residents
Summary
This submission requests that provision is made in the plan for a road to accommodate estate traffic linking the Summerhill Road with
Manorlands estate. It is stated that the present entrance to the Manorlands private sites is most dangerous.
33
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Recommendation
The issue raised in this submission is noted however, this matter should be addressed by FP4. FP 4 relates to the lands to the immediately
south east and west of Manorlands Estate. This Framework Plan will examine and where appropriate provide for enhanced linkages with
adjoining lands to ensure a fully integrated and comprehensive development at this location.
58.
Submission by Patrick and Margaret Walsh, Kiltoom, Trim
Summary
This submission expresses concerns in relation to the impact of development proposals on existing residential amenities enjoyed by Mr. and
Mrs. Walsh. It is stated that they are fearful that if proposals in the plan go ahead they would be unable to access their home and that they will
be living on a building site for the next 5 years.
Recommendation
The points made in this submission are noted. However, such matters will be addressed as part of a Part 8 proposal which would be required
for the provision of the road. Detailed drawings would be prepared at this stage and members of the public will have an opportunity to make a
submission at this stage.
59.
Submission by Richard and Sharon Walsh, Kiltoome, Trim
Summary
This submission expresses concerns in relation to the impact of proposed distributor road development proposals on existing residential
amenities enjoyed by Mr. and Mrs. Walsh.
Recommendation
As per recommendation above.
60.
Submission by Carey Associates on behalf of County Meath VEC
Summary
This submission relates to 2 no. sites in the ownership of the VEC. The sites are located at the junction of New Haggard Street and Emmett St.
and the junction of the New Haggard Street and the Summerhill Road. It is requested that the former site be rezoned from G1 and part B1 to all
B1 or C1 use. With respect to the latter site it is requested that consideration be given to rezoning this site from G1 to C1. It is also requested
34
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
that the lands be included within the order of priority for the release of residential development. It is stated that it is the intention of the VEC to
dispose of the two sites and to provide a new community educational facility within the Trim development area utilising the proceeds of the sale.
Maps were submitted as part of this submission.
Recommendation
The Planning Department has no objection to the rezoning of the subject lands as proposed, given their town centre locations and the stated
intention of the VEC to relocate to alternative sites in Trim. It is considered appropriate that the premises at the junction of Emmet St. and New
Haggard Street be rezoned from G1 to B1 and the premises at the junction of New Haggard Street and the Summerhill Road be rezoned from
G1 to C1. However it should be noted that premises at the junction of New Haggard St. and the Summerhill Road is registered as a protected
structure in the Draft RPS and will have to be retained as part of any future redevelopment of this site.
61.
Submission by Meath VEC (Submissions no. 60 and 61 are related)
Summary
The submission states that it is the intention of the VEC to relocate its services to purpose built modern facilities within the Trim Development
Plan boundary. It is also stated that the Old Vocational School buildings could form part of the enhancement plans for the town centre.
Recommendation
As per recommendation above.
62.
Submission by Hassett Ducatez Architects on behalf of Marie Cusack
Summary
This submission relates to lands off the Dunderry Road adjacent to Oaktree Business Park. The subject lands extend to 4.025ha in area. It is
requested that the zoning objective on the lands be amended to provide for a retail park zoning. It is stated that the subject lands would be
suited to a retail park zoning for a number of reasons including, its proximity to a well arranged road network and public transport facilities, its
edge of town location, its previous zoning objective, its proximity to other similar uses, its opportunity to create a gateway development.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this submission. It is considered that there are sufficient lands reserved in the plan to provide for
retail warehousing. Furthermore, it is important that suitable lands are reserved in the Plan to facilitate the relocation of non-compatible town
centre uses from the town centre.
35
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
63.
Submission by Cllr. Seamus Murray
Summary
This submission expresses concerns in relation to the proximity of the proposed Longwood Road Roundabout to the residence of Mr. P. Doyle.
Recommendation
As per recommendation no 42.
64.
Submission by Trim Celtic AFC
Summary
This submission requests that recognition be given to Trim Celtic AFC as a main community/recreational facility and that every support be
given to an expansion or relocation programme for the club given the growth in membership in recent years and the inadequacy of the current
facilities provided. This submission acknowledges and welcomes many of the policies put forward in the Draft Development Plan. However, it
is requested that the Development Plan expressly offers the opportunity for developers or other third parties, including the Local Authority, to
get involved with clubs, community recreational facilities and societies in order to help both expertly and financially. An amendment to social
policy no. 18 is also requested to read ‘to support and encourage local sport and community groups in the provision, expansion and
development of outdoor and indoor community facilities and where necessary facilitate the input of a third party’ (requested amendments
indicated in bold). Trim Celtic state that they are seeking the support of the Local Authority in their relocation to an appropriate site within a
close distance of the town centre.
Recommendation
The points made in the submission are noted. The written statement will be amended to reflect the importance of Trim Celtic AFC to the
community. Furthermore, the Planning Department accepts the merits in expanding the specific social policy no. 18 to encourage and support
the input of third parties in the provision of community and sporting facilities.
65.
Submission by Declan Brassil and Co. Ltd. On behalf of Mr. James K. Martin and Margot Martin, Greek Park, Trim
Summary
This submission refers to lands at Commons (7th Division), Trim. This submission requests that the road objective RT5 be realigned in a
westerly direction in order to facilitate access to all lands and allow for the continued development of the G1 zoned lands to the north/north east
of the subject lands. It is also requested that the lands, zoned open space F1 be rezoned to G1 use in order to facilitate the relocation of the
36
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
soccer club to lands which would allow for expansion of facilities, and to ensure the optimisation of the use of the Objective G1 lands for
community uses. It is submitted they these lands should be included as part of a Framework Plan to ensure the coherent and efficient use of
these lands.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support the proposal to realign the RT5 objective in a westerly direction. RT5 forms part of the proposed
Distributor Road network and links to RT4 and RT6. Furthermore, to extend the development envelope in a westerly direction would militate
against the objective to achieve a compact urban settlement and be contrary to the principles of sustainable development.
66.
Submission by Trim Town F.C
Summary
This submission refers to the lands off the Longwood Road which are currently leased by Trim Town F.C. It requested that the proposed road
objective in the vicinity of these land be removed from it present location and relocated westwards to facilitate the expansion of the club and
the possibility of providing two pitches, training area, dressing rooms/showers and car park.
Recommendation
As per recommendation no. 54.
67.
Submission by Seamus Murphy, Summerhill Road. Trim
Summary
This submission relates to 15 acres of lands at Grangeboyne Kilmessan, approx. 2 miles from Trim. It is requested that the subject lands be
zoned for D1 use ‘to provide for visitor and tourist accommodation and leisure facilities and not as a Special Area of Conservation. It is
submitted that the subject lands would have the potential to be developed as a unique mix of family entertainment covering heritage, sport and
outdoor activities.
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support the proposal put forward in this submission. The subject lands are far removed from the proposed
Draft Development Plan envelope and represents ‘leap frogging’ of development. However, the Planning Department contend that the tourism
potential of these lands would be assessed on their own merits and the Planning Department have adopted a positive attitude to such
proposals in the past without the lands being zoned for a particular use.
37
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
68.
Submission by Scurlogstown Olympiad
Summary
This submission details the history of the Scurlogstown Olympiad. Reference is made to updating visitor facilities in the town including the
provision of a Folk Theatre, Folk Farm, and a Farming Museum. It is requested that part of the Porchfield be preserved as a Conservation Area
for native Flora, Fauna, Birds and Wildlife. It is also requested that the Olympiad be included as a member of the field management committee
of the Porchfield.
Recommendation
The Planning Department note the importance of the Scurlogstown Olympiad to Trim and the written statement will be amended to reflect this.
However, the specific points raised with respect are not a matter for the Development Plan.
69.
Submission by Trim Athletic Club
Summary
This submission refers to lands adjacent to Boyne Community School. It is stated that the Athletic Club has attained permission from the
Management of the Boyne Community School to use the school’s playing pitches and that resources have been put into this by the Athletic
Club. It is submitted that the playing pitches are also used by other local clubs and athletic clubs and that it should be zoned as ‘open space’
as it is a very necessary outlet for health sporting pursuits.
Recommendation
As per recommendation to submission no. 11. It should be noted however, that the Dept. of Education and Science are amenable to making
the school facilities available for community and recreational use subject to priority of school use and to other basic conditions.
70.
Submission by John Fallon, 9 Haggard St.
Summary
This submission refers to no. 9 Haggard St (RPS ID No. TT036-004, Terraced two-bay two-storey brick house, built c.1910. Pitched artificial
slate roof with brick chimneystacks.) Concern is expressed that the Draft Development Plan will prohibit Mr. Fallon ability to install a window in
the gable end of his property.
38
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Recommendation
The Planning Department does not support this proposal. The insertion of a window in the gable end of a house, where this gable is visible
from the public street, would require planning permission. This would apply whether or not the building is a protected structure. It is
recommended that this building would be retained on the Record of Protected Structures in the Development Plan.
39
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Appendix A
Persons / Bodies who were informed of the publication of the Draft Trim Development Plan under the statutory process.
Assistant Principal,
Spatial Policy,
Department of the Environment, Heritage
& Local Government,
Custom House,
Dublin 1.
Minister for Public Enterprise,
44 Kildare Street,
Dublin 2.
Department of Communications,
Marine & Natural Resources,
Leeson Lane,
Dublin 2.
Mr. John Wynne,
Assistant Principal,
Co-ordination Unit,
Planning Section,
Dept. of Education,
Tullamore,
Co. Offaly.
Office of Public Works
Newtown,
40
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Trim,
Co. Meath.
Bord Failte,
Baggot Street Bridge,
Dublin 2.
Central Fisheries Board
Mobhi Boreen,
Glasnevin,
Dublin 9.
The Secretary for ESB,
ESB Head Office,
27 Lower Fitzwilliam Street,
Dublin 2.
Dublin Transport Office
Floor 3, Hainault House,
69-71 St. Stephens Green,
Dublin 2.
Commissioners of Public Works
51 St. Stephens Green,
Dublin 1.
National Heritage Council,
Rothe House,
Parliament Street,
Kilkenny.
Health Board Executive,
North Eastern Area,
41
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Headfort Place,
Kells,
Co. Meath.
Eastern Regional Fisheries Board,
15A Main Street
Blackrock
Co. Dublin.
National Roads Authority,
St. Martins House,
Waterloo Road,
Dublin 2.
Department of Arts,
Sports & Tourism,
Kildare Street,
Dublin.
An Taisce,
Tailors Hall,
Back Lane,
Dublin 8.
.
Dublin Regional Authority,
11 Parnell Square,
Dublin 1.
The Manager,
Development Applications Unit,
Department of the Environment
42
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
& Local Government,
Dun Sceine,
Harcourt Lane,
Dublin 2.
Minister for Education &
Science,
Secretarial Headquarters,
Marlborough St.,
Dublin 1.
Meath County Development Board,
County Hall,
Railway Street,
Navan,
Co. Meath.
National Parks & Wildlife Service,
Department. of Environment, Heritage
& Local Government,
7 Ely Place,
Dublin 2.
Bus Eireann,
Broadstone,
Dublin 7.
An Taisce,
Gate Lodge,
Bective House,
Balgill,
Navan,
43
Summary Report on Submissions received to Draft Trim Development Plan 2008-2014
Co. Meath.
Mr. John Barry,
Manager of Capital Projects
Transmission Operations
Bord Gais Eireann,
Gasworks Road,
Cork.
Mr. Tadhg O’Mahony,
Regional Inspectorate,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Inniscarra,
Co. Cork.
Elected Members of Meath County Council
44