Chapter 12 Work Motivation INP3004/MAN3360 Dr. Steve Motivation Performance = Ability x Opportunity x Motivation • Ability – • Opportunity – • Motivation – What motivates you? • • • • • Money Praise Sense of accomplishment Power Affiliation Theories of Motivation Maslow’s Need Hierarchy Theory • Behavior is determined by the lowest unmet need • Spend our lives trying reach Self-Actualization SA Esteem Social Safety Physiological Maslow’s Need Hierarchy Theory Critique • • • • • Self-Actualization is poorly defined (measure?) Others proposed fewer levels of need Question whether needs must be met in order Little if any empirical support More descriptive of life than theory of motivation in the workplace Theories of Motivation Equity Theory (Adams) • Equity Theory – • Inputs – • Outcomes – Equity Theory Self Other Comparison 20 / 20 20 / 20 Fair – no inequity 20 / 10 40 / 20 Fair – no inequity 20 / 20 20 / 40 Unfair – underpaid 20 / 40 20 / 20 Unfair – overpaid Equity Theory How do you fix inequity? (How does inequity motivate us?) • If overpaid hourly rate – •If overpaid on piecemeal rate – • If underpaid on hourly rate – • If underpaid on piecemeal rate – Equity Theory Critique • Some empirical evidence – individuals found to reduce effort when believed they were underpaid • Other ways to fix inequity when perceive underpayment: • Problems: Theories of Motivation Expectancy Theory (Vroom) • Effort Performance Reward Goals • Five Part model 1. Job Outcomes (O) – 2. Valence (V)– • Example: Promotion = +10, Fired = -10, Transfer = -5 3. Instrumentality (I) – 4. Expectancy (E) – 5. Force (F) – • Force = E ( V I) Expectancy Theory Example Outcomes Valence Instrumentality Expectancy Force Promotion Raise Transfer 10 .5 8 .1 -5 .5 0 Force = .5 [(10 x .5) + (8 x .1) + (-5 x 0)] = 2.9 Expectancy Theory Validation • Force = 2.9, So What? • Correlate force score with other measure of effort to validate theory (e.g., hrs spent on job, peer ratings, etc.). • Validate – Between Subjects experiment – – Within Subjects experiment – • Results: Expectancy Theory Implications • Placement vs. Selection – Theory better predicts what tasks a person is most motivated to perform than who is most motivated • • • Placement validities: .5 to .6 Selection validities: .3 to .4 How to make theory work for you (as a Mgr.): Theories of Motivation Reinforcement Theory (Skinner) • Based on Thorndike’s “Law of Effect” – • Skinner suggests not a theory at all, but a description of the cause of behaviors – MOTIVATION? • • • • SD--- R Sr+ SD = Discriminative Stimulus – A R = Response – B Sr+ = Reinforcing Stimulus – C Reinforcement Theory Schedules of Reinforcement • Fixed Interval – – Scalloping response pattern – Example – • Fixed Ratio – – Post-reinforcement pauses – Example – • Variable Interval – • Fairly steady responding – Example – • Variable Ratio – – Continuous, rapid responding Reinforcement Theory Schedules of Reinforcement Variable Ratio 400 Fixed Ratio 300 Variable Interval Fixed Interval 200 100 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (Minutes) 30 35 40 Reinforcement Theory Which Schedules Work Best? • Continuous reinforcement to acquire new skill • Intermittent reinforcement to maintain skill – Ratio better than Interval (more rapid responding) – Variable better than fixed (higher resistance to extinction) Theories of Motivation Goal Setting Theory • Goal Setting Theory – • Goals help tell how much effort must be exerted • Goals are most motivating when they are: 1. 2. 3. 4. Goal Setting Theory Experimental Results Percent of possible performance 100 90 80 70 Do your best 60 Specific hard goal 50 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Blocks of four weeks From Latham & Baldes (1975), “The Practical Significance of Locke’s Theory of Goal Setting,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, p.123 Job Characteristics Model Five core job dimensions (Hackman & Oldham) 1. Skill Variety – 2. Task Identity – 3. Task Significance – 4. Autonomy – 5. Feedback – Job Characteristics Model Core Job Dimensions Critical Psychological States Skill Variety Task Identity Task Significance Experienced meaningfulness of work Autonomy Experienced responsibility for outcomes of work Feedback Knowledge of actual results of work activities Employee Growth Need Strength Personal and Work Outcomes High internal work motivation High quality work performance High satisfaction with work Low absenteeism and turnover Job Characteristics Model Formula to determine motivating potential of job Motivating Potential Score = (MPS) Skill Task Task + + Variety Identity Significance 3 x Autonomy x Feedback Comparison of Motivation Theories Theory Source of Motivation Empirical Support Industrial Applicability Need Theory Unconscious, innate needs Weak: Little support for proposed relationships among needs Very limited: Theory lacks sufficient specificity to guide behavior Equity Theory Drive to reduce feelings of tension caused by perceived inequity Mixed: Good support for underpayment inequity, weak support for overpayment inequity Limited: Social comparisons are made, but feelings of inequity can be reduced through means other than increased motivation Expectancy Theory Relationship among desired outcomes, performance-reward, and effort-performance variables Moderate-strong: More strongly supported in withinsubject (placement) than between-subject (selection) experiments Strong: Theory provides a rational basis for why people expend effort, although not all behavior is as consciously determined as postulated Reinforcement Theory Schedule of reinforcement used to reward people for their performance Moderate: Ratio reinforcement schedules evoke superior performance compared to interval schedules, but little difference exists among various ratio schedules Moderate: Contingent payment for performance is possible in some jobs, although ethical problems can be present in an organization’s attempt to shape employee behavior Goal Setting Theory Intention to direct behavior in pursuit of acceptable goals Moderate-strong: Performance under goal-setting conditions usually superior to conditions under which no goals are set Strong: Ability to set goals is not restricted to certain types of people or jobs 7 Things Needed to Motivate Employees 1. Ensure worker’s motives are appropriate for job 2. Make jobs attractive and consistent with worker’s motives 3. Define clear, challenging goals (goal setting) 4. Provide necessary resources to do job (opportunity) 5. Create social support systems (respectful environment) 6. Use positive reinforcement for good performance 7. Combine previous 6 into one system Katzell and Thompson
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz