Assignment 2: Public Submission for Australia’s Foreign Policy White Paper Building economic potential and regional engagement in the Asia Pacific Words: 2, 302 Public submission: Building economic potential and regional engagement in the Asia Pacific Executive summary: Australia is at a fork in the road. Today Australia needs to incorporate its foreign policy with its economic potential and foster greater regional engagement in the Asia Pacific region. In this paper, I propose putting the Asia-Pacific region at the centre of Australia’s foreign policy, by planning a Regional Economic Development (RED) Plan that establishes five key economic business centres and an incubator in the region. This Plan takes the current aims of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and moves it to the next level, to one not only supporting Australian businesses abroad but to where it proactively creates business opportunities for Australia. Working from six strategic locations, the Centres will work towards lifting the business outcomes for Australia and the associated state. The centres will focus on achieving business goals such as increased trade, business development and over time assist with soft power goals, like developing stability, fostering engagement and building ties with the local communities. To be implemented over the next 10 25 years, it is anticipated the centres will grow their own community of successful local businesses, strengthen engagement and deepen the regional relationship Australia has with each of the five Asia-Pacific countries. Recommendations: It is recommended the Australian government undertake the implementation of the RED Plan, broken down into five key points: 1) Develop the RED Plan: formulate a RED Plan outlining the conception of five business centres and an incubator. This plan, would inform the strategic goals and aims for the centres, in the long and short term, and contain a regional partnership plan, financial plan, educational plan, etc. 2) Plan the creation of five centres and incubator: The RED plan identifies the need to shortlist locations for the five Centres and Incubator. The creation and establishment of the centres and incubator could be incorporated to DFAT’s Economic Diplomacy and contribute directly to its four pillars: trade, growth, investment and business. 3) Identify government agencies that can assist to Centre development: Identify government resources that can assist with the establishment of the Centres, particularly knowledge of locations, contacts in tertiary organisations, businesses, individuals, etc. 4) Create Centres with strong business directive: each centre will be created with the intent that it will be paid back to government in the first 10 years and become fully self-funded thereafter. The five centres and incubator will have result-oriented Centre Directors who will have regional knowledge of their centres and who will work closely with key government departments, like DFAT, Business Australia, Productivity Commission, ASIC, etc. 5) Integrate tertiary organisations into the planning of centres and incubators: Each Centre will have a partner university to assist with the achievement of its business, regional and local goals. The university will assist in the development of the centre, providing research, training and business acumen needed to develop it. Tertiary organisations with specific industry knowledge or established presence in a country will be invited to participate. Submission’s response to White Paper’s key issues: 1) Australia’s foreign policy needs to be grounded in a clear-eyed assessment of our national interests Today Australia’s national interest is one best located in a foreign policy geared towards developing its economic potential and fostering greater regional engagement with the Asia-Pacific region first, and rest of the world thereafter. 2) Australia has diverse interests that span the globe Due to budgetary constraints, Australia must prioritise and focus on improving and augmenting the economic prospects of specific Asia-Pacific countries in our region, and creating Centres that build economic links between both countries for years to come. These centres will enable Australia to nurture offshore business interests as well as deepen and solidify our ‘soft power’ diplomacy in key areas. In this way, Australia will be able to create momentum for our own economy and attract hard to find, specialised talent to Australia. The development of these business centres should be in key cities associated with new technologies, manufacturing or renewal energy technology. Australia’s business development abroad should also not be compromised by groups that refuse to address climate change, environmental degradation and global trends like renewable energy. Australia must now, demonstrate a level of state ‘maturity’ by identifying a national interest that is both scientifically solid (research-based) and socially equitable for both Australians and our Asia-Pacific counterparts alike. 3) Australia is an influential player in regional and international organisations Australia must recognise that it’s in our national interest to see the wider Asia-Pacific region prosper. Australia’s ‘soft-power’ potential can only be enhanced by the creation of these centres, which will enable for dialogue and improved economic prospects in problem areas in nearby countries. However Australia will need to recognise its regional commitments and alliances, introduce new levels of transparency and accountability within its organisations, and build some international infrastructure to assist with the centres. Australia should signal its interest to join ASEAN (Dobell, 6 Oct 2015, ASPI) and as a national priority work to regulate and stabilise its economic and banking sectors (2016,Parliament of the CoA) so as to ensure business ventures from the region work in fair, competitive markets. Additionally Australia should ‘embrace’ its previous identity as a good global citizen, recognise and adhere to its international obligations with the United Nations and once the centres are established, consider entering into Free Trade Agreements with the five countries where these centres are located. In this way maximising the impact and economic potential of its Centres. 4) Australia needs to be ambitious in grasping economic opportunities This submission specifically addresses Australia’s need to put its economic opportunities at the centre of its foreign policy. This submission’s central premise is that Australia must create a RED Plan that establishes five key economic business centres and an incubator in the Asia-Pacific region. 5) Australia confronts a range of strategic, security and transnational challenges Australia can best deal with instability in the region by addressing it and working with other nations to find regional solutions, rather than taking an isolationist approach to the issues. Australia must also improve at dealing with the instability within its own domestic quarters, and managing the extreme factions of domestic politics, which could have a destabilising effect on the nation. The Australian government should start promoting the inclusive ‘fair-go’ attitude and clarify that racism and xenophobia are unacceptable and identify multiculturalism as a pillar of Australian society. Today it is central the deepening of extremism in Western countries doesn’t affect our multicultural society. Intolerant community groups of any sort should not be condoned, particularly if the government wants to maintain an image of a fair and balanced society, open to new commerce. 6) Australia uses a range of assets and capabilities to pursue our international interests Australia’s intellectual assets will be key in establishing and developing the business centres and in attracting talented workers and new businesses to Australia. The government should encourage our own domestic businesses to expand into these emerging markets and create mutual benefit between these countries. Central threats: Lack of regional willingness to participate For this economic plan to succeed, Australia must promote this economic plan both in the short and long term. Commitment to make the plan’s goals achievable will require substantial business engagement with the regional and local communities involved. The Australia government will need to assume some broader (financial, cultural, etc.) responsibility for the local community in order for each centre to gain genuine local support. This will be one of the most challenging and important goals of the economic plan. Lack of solid financial backing While the Australia government will initially have to pay for the Centres’ establishment costs, with good management, it could expect a return on investment within the first 10 years or so. If possible, a partnership or economic outcomes document should be developed for the five local regions and if possible, the local community should be involved in the centre’s development, thus not separating itself from the community it is located in. Funding for the centres will initially come from DFAT, but it is anticipated once centres are running, future funding might be found from appropriate industry sector businesses. -Poor business outcomes Comprehensive business planning of the economic Centres will be key to making them sustainable and profitable. Likely to be established with numerous business interests, each Centre will require specialists in their fields, and resources and infrastructure to advance their specific area. Identifying the necessary business resources and human capital are essential to build sustainable and best practice models of business able to last the life of the centres. The need to generate contingency (and risk) plans, prior to the creation of the centres is key, as is identifying the need to diversify each centre’s aims and sources of income. Background: 1) Creating the economic development plan: The planning stages of the RED plan will be the most crucial, as this is where the long-term goals for the five centres will be delineated. Creating this long-term plan will require a broad assessment of Australia’s economic potential and an evaluation of our industries and their capacity to grow in the long-term future via the five centres. Regional projects like China’s One Belt One Road project is expected to deliver significant movement of trade and commerce throughout parts of Asia (Leung, South China Morning Post, 5 May 2016) The long-term vision of this plan, should include: long-term projections of regional growth (5-25 years), location of centres and incubator, timelines for centre establishment, broader aims of centres and incubator, regional engagement plans (for each centre), centre progression plans, etc. This regional plan will require the setting of goals that are realistic and achievable. A researched and comprehensive forecasting exercise should be conducted to inform the initial plan. From this document, an accompanying Financial Plan for the whole RED plan and individual centre plans should be created. 2) Plan the establishment of five centres: Populating a regional strategy like the RED Plan will rely on the already established resources the DFAT in the Asia-Pacific region has. Formulating an effective business plan will require the identification of areas of business that Australia can contribute to. Australia’s selling point in the region will be it’s ‘Australian’ knowledge and pledge to provide a high level of product or service. In addition, each centre will work towards assisting and lifting the level of economic and cultural development in the local community. Possible locations for regional centres include: - Samarinda Port, Indonesia; shipping, logistics, forestry - Dhaka, Bangladesh: trade, shipping and logistics -One Belt One Road (OBOR) partner - Legazpi city, Philippines: education, tourism, commerce (Entrepreneur, 2016) - Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: mining, trade, logistics -OBOR partner - Mandalay, Myanmar: trading, production and logistics - OBOR partner(HKTDC Research, 2016). 3) Identify relevant government resources for centre development: DFAT’s government resources will be essential in the establishment of the five Centres. Key to this is the providing of resources (buildings, technology, etc.) but also the gathering of intellectual capital (policy and research resources) and organisational knowledge. The establishment of more difficult resources like local business contacts, and profile in the community, will require long-term commitment. Depending on the resourcing of the centres, some mentoring and networking capacity could be offered to local businesses as part of the Centre’s role. Each Centre’s plan will identify the key business aims (and appropriate contacts needed) on the ground at the five locations. In addition, the centres will be encouraged to make use of established DFAT programs, such as the Seasonal Worker Program and Australian Volunteers for International Development (AVID) to attract Australians to the Centres. 4) Create Centres with strong business directive: the establishment of the RED Plan will outline the business directives of each of the centres. Financially, each centre will be expected to payback the initial investment provided to each centre, becoming fully self-funded within the first 10 years. It is anticipated each centre will generate income by providing some level of human resource skills, like mentoring, networking, and business advice to the local business community. The providing of mentoring and resources will work on a user-pays system (for the first three years) with an exception to local community groups. The centres will also offer additional information and resources providing limited access to Australian business agencies, like Business Australia, Productivity Commission, DFAT, ASIC etc. 5) Integrate tertiary organisations into the planning of centres and incubators: Each Centre will have a partner university/tertiary organisation to assist in the development of it. Standard Memorandum of Understandings (MoUs) will be formulated to enhance and develop each centre. Each university will be invited to assist and develop research, training and business acumen around each centre and the local community. Universities or tertiary organisations with relevant or specific industry or regional knowledge will be invited to participate. The Regional Plan will also outline the unique role of the Incubator, which will act as an effective launching pad for emerging Australian businesses into the region. Ideally the government should seek a partnership arrangement with a high-performing tertiary incubator to establish an outpost of that incubator in the Asia-Pacific region. Conclusion: In this paper, we have seen how the RED Plan could be implemented. While like any Plan, it has a level of risk involved, this risk can be mitigated by the careful implementation of the plan over the next few years. While the RED plan is likely to be a significant long-term investment, it would be a calculated risk, one that would, with strategic planning, delivers good business outcomes in the Asia-Pacific for years to come. Whether we seek to expand on the region’s economic potential or merely improve our soft-power diplomacy, our opportunity for business development in the region is now in its prime and should be maximised as much as possible. Indeed, as outlined earlier, Australia’s own identification with the region and economic potential depend upon it. Bibliography: Beeson, M. (2011) “Can Australia save the world? The limits and possibilities of middle power diplomacy” Australian Journal of International Affairs. Vol 65, No. 5, p.563- 577. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2012). Australia in the Asian Century White Paper. Link: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/133850/201309140122/asiancentury.dpmc.gov.au/whit e-paper.html Dobell, G. (2015) “Why Australia should join ASEAN?” Australian Strategic Policy Institute. 6 October. Link: https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/why-australia-should-joinasean/ Entrepreneur Philippines (2016) “Bicol takes lead as fastest growing regional economy”. 1 August. Link: http://www.entrepreneur.com.ph/news-and-events/bicoltakes-lead-as-fastest-growing-regional-economy-a36-20160801 HKTDC Research (2016) “Myanmar Rising: the Mandalay opportunity”. 14 July. Link: http://economists-pick-research.hktdc.com/business-news/article/ResearchArticles/Myanmar-Rising-The-MandalayOpportunity/rp/en/1/1X000000/1X0A6RN4.htm House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics (2016) “Review of the Four Major Banks: First Report” Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Link: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Economics/Four _Major_Banks_Review Jensen, F & Gloystein, H. (2017) “Chaos at Indonesian ports disrupts coal shipping” Reuters. 8 February. Link: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-coal-indonesia-exportsidUSKBN15N0R3 Leung, A. (2016) “Huge potential gains of China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ are worth the risks”. South China Morning Post, 5 May. Link: http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1941104/huge-potential-gainschinas-one-belt-one-road-are-worth Sherrell, H. (2017) “The Seasonal Worker Program: who is coming to Australia?” DevPolicyBlog. 25 January. Link: http://devpolicy.org/seasonal-worker-programcoming-australia-20170125/ South China Morning Post (2016) “Infographic: How One Belt One Road will give China’s developing neighbours easier access to Chinese-made products” 19 May. Link: http://www.scmp.com/infographics/article/1874865/infographic-one-belt-oneroad Trood, R. (2013) “A lengthy list: Australia’s future foreign policy challenges” Australian Strategic Policy Institute. 15 August. Link: https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/a-long-list-australias-future-foreign-policychallenges/ Wesley, M. (2010) “Taking Asia Seriously” Australian Journal of Political Science. Vol 45, No. 1, March 2010, pp. 13-28.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz