JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
Joint Crediting Mechanism Guidelines for Developing Proposed Methodology
CONTENTS
1.
Scope and applicability ......................................................................................................... 2
2.
Terms and definitions ............................................................................................................ 2
3.
Key concepts ......................................................................................................................... 2
3.1.
Reference emissions....................................................................................................... 2
3.2.
Eligibility criteria ........................................................................................................... 3
4.
General Guidelines ................................................................................................................ 3
5.
Instructions for completing the Proposed Methodology Form.............................................. 4
6.
Instructions for completing the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet ................................. 14
Annex I.
Sectoral Scopes for the JCM .................................................................................... 20
1
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
1. Scope and applicability
1.
Joint Crediting Mechanism Guidelines for Developing Proposed Methodology (hereinafter
referred to as “these Guidelines”) are intended to assist each side or project participants
(hereinafter
referred
to as
“methodology proponents”)
in
preparing
proposed
methodologies for the Joint Crediting Mechanism (hereinafter referred to as “JCM”)
(hereinafter referred to as “proposed methodologies”).
2.
These Guidelines are also to be referred to by the Joint Committee in developing and
assessing proposed methodologies.
3.
These Guidelines describe standards which are requirements to be met, except guidance
indicated with terms “should” and “may” as defined in paragraph 5 below.
4.
Submission and subsequent assessment of a proposed methodology are conducted in line
with the procedure delineated in Joint Crediting Mechanism Project Cycle Procedure.
2. Terms and definitions
5.
The following terms apply in this Guidelines:
(a) “Should” is used to indicate that among several possibilities, one course of action is
recommended as particularly suitable;
(b) “May” is used to indicate what is permitted.
6.
Terms in the Proposed Methodology Form are defined in JCM Glossary of Terms available
on the JCM website.
3. Key concepts
3.1. Reference emissions
7.
In the JCM, emission reductions to be credited are defined as the difference between
reference emissions and project emissions.
8.
The reference emissions are calculated to be below business-as-usual (BaU) emissions
which represent plausible emissions in providing the same outputs or service level of the
proposed JCM project in Mongolia.
Figure: Indicative diagram of the relationship between the BaU emissions, reference emissions
and project emissions
2
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
3.2. Eligibility criteria
9.
Eligibility criteria in proposed methodologies contain the following:
(a) Requirements for the project in order to be registered as a JCM project.
(b) Requirements for the project to be able to apply the approved methodology.
4. General Guidelines
10. Methodology proponents prepare the proposed methodology by filling in the Proposed
Methodology Form and the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet, attached to these
Guidelines.
11. These Guidelines, the Proposed Methodology Form and the Proposed Methodology
Spreadsheet may be obtained electronically from the JCM website.
12. The Proposed Methodology Form and the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet are
completed in English language.
13. Methodology proponents provide supporting documents to justify key logical and
quantitative assumptions regarding the choice of eligibility criteria, default values and
establishment of reference emissions.
14. The Joint Committee develops the Proposed Methodology Form and the Proposed
Methodology Spreadsheet and may revise them if necessary.
15. The Proposed Methodology Form is not altered, that is, is completed without modifying its
format, font, headings. If sections of the Proposed Methodology Form are not applicable, it
is explicitly stated that the section is left blank on purpose.
16. The Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet enables calculation of GHG emission reductions
automatically through inputting values by project participants. The Proposed Methodology
Spreadsheet consists of the following:
(a) An Input Sheet containing all the parameters to be monitored ex post, project-specific
parameters to be fixed ex ante by the project participants (e.g. historical data) as well as
the default factors which can be changed by the project participants. For each
parameter, the methodology proponents fill in all the required fields, except for those
of the inputted values;
(b) A Calculation Process Sheet containing all the default values which cannot be changed
by the project participant, calculation process to derive reference emissions and project
emissions, and the resulting emission reductions.
17. The proposed methodology:
(a) Describes the procedures in a manner that is sufficiently explicit to enable the
methodology to be used, be applied to projects unambiguously, and be reproduced by a
third party;
3
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
(b) Is possible for projects following the methodology to be subjected to JCM validation
and/or verification;
(c) Includes all algorithms, formulae, and step-by-step procedures needed to apply the
methodology and validate the project, i.e. calculating reference emissions and project
emissions;
(d) Provides instructions for making any logical or quantitative assumptions that are not
provided in the methodology and is made by the methodology user;
(e) Avoids the intentional increase of credits caused by perverse incentives (e.g. when an
increase in output is triggered by incentive to increase credits).
18. The presentation of values in the Proposed Methodology Form and the Proposed
Methodology Spreadsheet should be in international standard format (e.g. 1,000
representing one thousand and 1.0 representing one). The units used should be
accompanied by their equivalent S.I. units/norms (thousand/million) as part of the
requirement to ensure transparency and clarity.
5. Instructions for completing the Proposed Methodology Form
Instructions for completing the Proposed Methodology Form are provided below. A
hypothetical proposed methodology on building energy management systems (BEMS) is
inserted to enhance the clarity of these Guidelines. This methodology is purely indicative and
does not imply that the methodology is to be adopted.
Cover sheet of the Proposed Methodology Form
Form for submitting the proposed methodology
Host Country
Mongolia
Name of the methodology proponents Energy Management System Japan Ltd.
submitting this form
Sectoral scope(s) to which the Proposed 3. Energy demand
Methodology applies
Title of the proposed methodology, and Improving the Efficiency of Energy Use with
version number
Building Energy Management System (BEMS)
List of documents to be attached to this form
The attached draft JCM-PDD:
(please check):
Additional information
1) Catalog of adopted technology: BEMS
2) Regulation
for
energy
efficiency
commercial buildings.
3) Feasibility studies and technical reports
Date of completion
01/04/2013
4
of
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
・ Methodology proponents should submit the proposed methodology to the Joint Committee
which is established by Mongolia and Japan.
・ The methodology proponents are each side, project participants, or the Joint Committee.
・ Please identify sectoral scope(s) according to the JCM sectoral scope(s) listed in Annex I.
・ Please indicate the following: (a) The title of the proposed methodology; (b) The version
number of the document. Please provide an unambiguous title for the proposed
methodology. The title should reflect the project types to which the methodology is
applicable. Do not use project-specific titles.
・ If the methodology proponents have attached additional information, please provide
description of the documents.
・ Fill in the date of completion in DD/MM/YYYY.
History of the proposed methodology
Version
01.0
Date
01/04/2013
Contents revised
First edition
・ If the methodology proponents revise a previously submitted methodology, please provide
date of revision in DD/MM/YYYY as well as a brief summary of revision.
A. Title of the methodology
Improving the Efficiency of Energy Use with Building Energy Management System (BEMS)
Version 1/0
・ Please indicate the following: (a) The title of the proposed methodology; (b) The version
number of the document. Provide an unambiguous title for the proposed methodology. The
title should reflect the project types to which the methodology is applicable. Do not use
project-specific titles.
・ Please include the GHG emission reduction measures (e.g. technology, product, or service)
adopted.
B. Terms and definitions
5
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
Terms
Definitions
BEMS
BEMS is a computer system designed to recognize the status
of energy use within indoor environments in commercial
buildings and so forth using; measurement/gauging, control,
and monitoring devices; analysis, diagnosis, and data storage
equipment in an attempt to “control” energy consuming
operations of equipment and facilities in these structures.
Furthermore, if the system is utilized for “visualization" only,
it is not to be directly used for emission reductions.
Therefore, such project is not to be included in this
methodology
・ Please provide definitions of key terms that are used in the proposed methodology.
C. Summary of the methodology
Items
GHG
emission
measures
Summary
reduction Building energy management system (BEMS) that improves the
efficiency of energy consumption for existing buildings by
monitoring and regulating electricity and fuel consumption.
Calculation
of
emissions
reference Reference emissions is calculated on the basis of project
emissions derived from monitored fuel and electricity
consumption, under the assumption that certain percentage of
energy consumption is decreased through introduction of
BEMS.
The BaU scenario assumes that BEMS will not be introduced in
Mongolia, which is justified since there are currently no plans to
introduce BEMS.
In the methodology, the rates of emission reductions through
various BEMS measures are fixed at a rate lower than those
commonly observed.
Therefore, the methodology results in a net reduction of
emissions, since reference emissions are lower than BaU
emissions.
Calculation
of
project Project emissions are calculated on the basis of monitored
6
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
emissions
electricity and fuel consumption.
Monitoring parameters
Electricity and fuel consumption are monitored.
・ Please summarize the key elements of the proposed methodology, including brief
description on:
・ GHG emission reduction measures;
・ How the proposed methodology calculates the reference emissions;
・ How the proposed methodology calculates the project emissions;
・ Key monitoring parameters and methods.
D. Eligibility criteria
This methodology is applicable to projects that satisfy all of the following criteria.
Criterion 1
Energy Management System is to be introduced in already existing buildings.
Criterion 2
The operation and control of equipment and facilities to reduce energy
consumption for indoor environments are to be carried out by Energy
Management System itself, not just upgrading equipments for energy
consumption.
Criterion 3
Be able to identify all energy consumption in the building(s) having equipment
controlled by Energy Management System.
・ Eligibility criteria are those that can be examined objectively.
・ Eligibility criteria include:
・ Characteristics to identify the measures (e.g. technology, product, or service) applied
to the methodology;
・ Conditions that are necessary in order to enable robust calculation of GHG emission
reductions by the algorithm contained in the methodology, e.g. the situation before the
implementation of the measure, in cases where reference emissions is calculated on
the basis of historical performance of the facility.
・ Eligibility criteria should be, to the extent possible, those that can be ascertained upon
validation, i.e. eligibility criteria should avoid those which need to be monitored ex post.
For example, actual performance of a measure should not be included as eligibility
criteria, since it is not certain at the validation whether the stated performance can be
achieved. On the other hand, performance as defined by nameplate figures can be included
as eligibility criteria since it can be readily checked upon validation.
・ Eligibility criteria may be represented by:
7
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
・ Certain technology (e.g. ultra supercritical coal fired power plants);
・ Certain technology with a design efficiency or performance indicator above a certain
threshold (e.g. a power plant with a thermal efficiency above X%);
・ Certain sector to which the measure is applied.
E. Emission Sources and GHG types
The emission sources include all the following GHG emission sources and GHG types in the
building to which BEMS is applied.
Reference emissions
Emission sources
GHG types
Electricity consumption by lighting
CO2
Electricity consumption by air conditioner
CO2
Diesel fuel consumption by boiler
CO2
Electricity consumption by fan
CO2
Electricity consumption by ICT equipments
CO2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project emissions
Emission sources
GHG types
Electricity consumption by lighting
CO2
Electricity consumption by air conditioner
CO2
Diesel fuel consumption by boiler
CO2
Electricity consumption by fan
CO2
Electricity consumption by ICT equipments
CO2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
・ Please identify all GHG emissions by sources that are significant and reasonably
attributable to the JCM project.
・ If deemed appropriate, please explain whether any sources related to the reference
emissions or the project emissions have been excluded, and if so, justify their exclusion.
・ Upstream emissions may be excluded unless they are deemed to be significant.
F. Establishment and calculation of reference emissions
8
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
F.1. Establishment of reference emissions
Reference emissions is calculated on the basis of project emissions derived from monitored fuel
and electricity consumption, under the assumption that certain percentage of energy
consumption is decreased through introduction of BEMS.
The BaU emissions assume that the emissions when BEMS will not be introduced in Mongolia,
which is justified since there are currently no plans to introduce BEMS.
In the methodology, the rates of emission reductions through various BEMS measures are fixed
at a rate lower than those commonly observed. Therefore, the methodology results in a net
reduction of emissions, since reference emissions are lower than the BaU emissions.
F.2. Calculation of reference emissions
REy = ( PEC,y * EFe,y + Σ( PFCi,y * NCVy * EFCO2,f,i,y)) / (100% - EERj)
REy
Reference CO2 emissions during the period of year y [tCO2/y]
PECy
Project electricity consumption by applicable equipment in year y [MWh/y]
EFe,y
CO2 emissions factor of electricity in year y [tCO2/MWh]
PFCi,y
Project consumption of fossil fuel i of the applicable equipment in year y［kl, t,
1000 Nm3/y］
NCVy
Net calorific value of fossil fuel i (diesel, kerosene, natural gas, etc.) in year y
[GJ/kl, t, 1000 Nm3]
*Any default value (XX GJ/kl, t, 1000 Nm3) or specific value for the project
that the project participants measure is available.
EFCO2,f,i,y
CO2 emissions factor of fossil fuel i (diesel, kerosene, natural gas, etc.) in year
y [tCO2/GJ]
EERj
Percentage of improvement in energy consumption efficiency [%] for building
type j using BEMS
Office building
VV%
Commercial building
WW%
Hotel
XX%
Hospital
YY%
Other
ZZ%
9
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
・ Please provide only one procedure for establishing reference emissions, which, in the view
of the methodology proponent, represents plausible emissions in providing the same
outputs or service level of the proposed JCM project in Mongolia.
・ Reference emissions should be established, taking into account the following:
・ If the reference emissions are defined by multiplying an emission factor and an output,
the output should be identical to or less than the monitored output of the project.
・ The reference emissions should comply with all applicable regulations of Mongolia.
・ Please provide a description on how the reference emissions are derived. Provide also a
description of how and why the reference emissions are below the BaU emissions.
・ Reference emissions may be derived from:
・ The current situation and performance;
・ Average historical performance;
・ Performance of similar products and technologies which compete with the project
technology;
・ Legal requirements;
・ Voluntary standards and targets;
・ Best available technology of Mongolia.
・ Please elaborate the method to calculate the reference emissions. Please be specific and
complete, so that the procedure can be carried out in an unambiguous way, replicated, and
subjected to assessment and verification:
・ Please explain the underlying rationale for the method to calculate (e.g. marginal vs.
average, etc.);
・ Please use consistent variables, equation formats, subscripts, etc.;
・ Please number all equations in the Proposed Methodology Form;
・ Please define all variables, with units indicated;
・ Please justify the conservativeness of the method to calculate.
・ Please elaborate all parameters, coefficients, and variables used in the calculation of
reference emissions:
・ For those values that are provided in the methodology:
・ Please clearly indicate the precise references from which these values are taken
(e.g. official statistics, IPCC Guidelines, commercial and scientific literature);
・ Justify the conservativeness of the values provided.
・ For those values that are to be provided by the project participants, please clearly
indicate how the values are to be selected and justified, for example, by explaining:
・ What types of sources are suitable (official statistics, expert judgment,
proprietary data, IPCC Guidelines, commercial and scientific literature, etc.);
10
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
・ The vintage of data that is suitable;
・ What spatial level of data is suitable (local, regional, national, international);
・ How conservativeness of the values is to be ensured.
・ For all data to be monitored or recorded by the project participants, please specify the
procedures to be followed if expected data are unavailable. For instance, the methodology
could point to a preferred data source, and indicate a priority order for use of additional
data and/or fall back data sources to preferred sources (e.g. private, international
statistics, etc.).
・ Please note any parameters, coefficients, variables, etc. that are used to calculate reference
emissions but should be obtained through monitoring.
・ Please explain any parts of the method to calculate that are not self-evident. Provide
references as necessary. Explain implicit and explicit key assumptions in a transparent
manner.
・ When referring to and/or making use of life cycle analysis (LCAs) and/or LCA tools,
methodology
proponents
provide,
in
a
transparent
manner,
all
equations,
parameterizations and assumptions used in the LCA. For example, this could be
accomplished by highlighting the relevant sections in an attached copy of the referenced
LCA.
・ The most recent IPCC default values may be used as necessary, when country or project
specific data are not available or difficult to obtain.
・ Methodologies requiring sampling as a part of monitoring clearly indicate the sampling
method, statistical treatment of sampled data (e.g. confidence level, margin of error). A
useful reference is the statistical treatment of sampled data for large scale CDM project
activities in latest version of “Standard for Sampling And Surveys For CDM Project
Activities and Programme of Activities” for large-scale CDM project activities.
・ Emission reductions from reduced consumption of international transport fuels cannot be
claimed under the JCM.
G. Calculation of project emissions
Project emissions are calculated on the basis of monitored electricity and fuel consumption.
PEy = PECy * EFe,y + Σ( PFCi,y * NCVy * EFCO2,f,i,y )
PEy
Project CO2 emissions in year y [tCO2/y]
PECy
Project electricity consumption by applicable equipment in year y [MWh/y]
EFe,y
CO2 emissions factor of electricity in year y [tCO2/MWh]
11
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
Project consumption of fossil fuel i of the applicable equipment in year y［kl, t,
PFCi,y
1000 Nm3/y］
NCVy
Net calorific value of fossil fuel i (diesel, kerosene, natural gas, etc.) in year y
[GJ/kl, t, 1000 Nm3]
*Any default value (XXGJ/kl, t, 1000 Nm3) or specific value for the project
that the project developer measures is available.
EFCO2,f,i,y
CO2 emissions factor for fossil fuel i (diesel, kerosene, natural gas, etc.) in
year y [tCO2/GJ]
・ Where applicable, method to calculate project emissions should adhere to the instruction
provided in the section on the reference emissions.
H. Calculation of emissions reductions
Emission reductions are calculated as the difference between the reference emissions and
project emissions, as follows.
ERy = REy - PEy
ERy
GHG emission reductions in year y [tCO2e]
REy
Reference emissions in year y [tCO2e/y]
PEy
Project emissions in year y [tCO2e/y]
・ Please elaborate the method to calculate used to estimate, measure or calculate the
emission reductions from the JCM project. In most cases, this will be simple equation with
two terms: the reference emissions, and the project emissions.
I. Data and parameters fixed ex ante
The source of each data and parameter fixed ex ante is listed as below.
Parameter
EERj
Description of data
Source
Percentage of improvement in energy
Results of feasibility studies
consumption efficiency for building type j
and existing technical reports.
using BEMS
EFe,y
CO2 emissions factor of electricity in year y
IEA CO2 emissions from fuel
combustion 2011 edition
NCVy
Net calorific value of fossil fuel i (diesel,
12
IPCC guideline 2006
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
kerosene, natural gas, etc.) in year y
EFCO2,f,i,y
CO2 emissions factor of fossil fuel i (diesel,
IPCC guideline 2006
kerosene, natural gas, etc.) in year y
・ Please identify sources of default values, where default values are applied to the proposed
methodology.
13
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
6. Instructions for completing the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet
Instructions for completing the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet are provided below. The Input Sheet of the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet should be completed as
follows. A hypothetical Input Sheet of the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet on building energy management systems (BEMS) is inserted to enhance the clarity of these
Guidelines. This is purely indicative and does not imply that the Input Sheet of the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet is adopted.
14
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
Proposed methodology spreadsheet (input sheet) [Attachment to Proposed Methodology Form]
Table 1: Parameters to be monitored ex post
(a)
(b)
(c)
Monitoring
Parameters
Description of data
point No.
(1)
PFCD,y
(d)
Estimated
Values
Project diesel fuel
consumption during the
period of year y
(e)
Units
kl/y
(f)
Monitoring
option
Option B
(g)
(h)
Source of data
Measurement methods and procedures
(i)
Monitoring
frequency
purchase records
- Collecting purchase amount from retailer invoices and
inputting to a spreadsheet manually
once a month
- Project deputy managers double check the input data with
invoices every 6 months
continuous
(j)
Other
comments
(2)
PECy
Project electricity
consumption during the
period of year y
MWh/y
Option C
monitored data
- Collecting electricity consumption data with
validated/calibrated electricity monitoring devices and
inputting to a spreadsheet electrically
- Verified monitoring devices are installed and they are
calibrated once a year.
- Verification and calibration shall meet international
standard on corresponding monitoring devices.
(3)
PFCL,y
Project LPG consumption
during the period of year y
t/y
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
(4)
PFCN,y
Project natural gas
consumption during the
period of year y
1000Nm3/y N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
(5)
PFCK,y
Project kerosene
consumption during the
period of year y
kl/y
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Table 2: Project-specific parameters to be fixed ex ante
(b)
(a)
Description of data
Parameters
EERoffice
Percentage of improvement in energy
consumption efficiency for [Office Building]
using BEMS
(c)
Estimated
Values
%
N/A
(d)
(e)
(f)
Units
Source of data
Other comments
Past records of 30 similar size office buildings for the period of 2008-2012 measured by the
project participant, BEMS provider.
Data set of each building has the data of before and after BEMS implementation at least for
one year respectively.
Table3: Ex-ante estimation of CO2 emission reductions
CO2 emission reductions
Units
0 tCO2/y
[Monitoring option]
Option B
Based on public data which is measured by entities other than the project participants (Data used: publicly recognized data such as statistical data and specifications)
Based on the amount of transaction which is measured directly using measuring equipments (Data used: commercial evidence such as invoices)
Option C
Based on the actual measurement using measuring equipments (Data used: measured values)
Option A
15
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
The Calculation Process Sheet of the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet should be completed
as follows. A hypothetical Calculation Process Sheet of the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet
on building energy management systems (BEMS) is inserted to enhance the clarity of these
Guidelines. This is purely indicative and does not imply that the Calculation Process Sheet is
adopted.
16
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
Proposed methodology spreadsheet (Calculation Process Sheet) [Attachment to Proposed Methodology Form]
1. Calculations for emission reductions
Fuel type
Value
Units
Emission reductions during the period of year y
0 tCO2/y
Parameter
ERy
2. Selected default values, etc.
CO2 emission factor of electricity in year y
Electricity
Net calorific value of fossil fuel in year y #1
Diesel
0.456 tCO2/MWh
37.7 GJ/kl
NCVD,y
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel in year y #1
Diesel
0.0687 tCO2/GJ
EFCO2,f ,D,y
Net calorific value of fossil fuel in year y #2
LPG
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel in year y #2
LPG
Net calorific value of fossil fuel in year y #3
Natural gas
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel in year y #3
Natural gas
Net calorific value of fossil fuel in year y #4
Kerosene
36.7 GJ/kl
NCVK,y
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel in year y #4
Kerosene
0.0679 tCO2/GJ
EFCO2,f ,K,y
50.8 GJ/t
0.0599 tCO2/GJ
43.5 GJ/1000Nm3
0.051 tCO2/GJ
EFe,y
NCVL,y
EFCO2,f ,L,y
NCVN,y
EFCO2,f ,N,y
3. Calculations for reference emissions
Reference emissions during the period of year y
0 tCO2/y
Project emissions during the period of year y
Energy use reduction coefficient with BEMS
0 tCO2/y
Office building
10.0 %
REy
PEy
EERj
4. Calculations of the project emissions
Project emissions during the period of year y
0 tCO2/y
Project emissions (electricity) during the period of year y
PEy
0 tCO2e /y
Project electricity consumption during the period of year y
Electricity
0 MWh/y
PECy
CO2 emission factor of electricity
Electricity
0.456 tCO2/MWh
EFe,y
Project emissions (diesel) during the period of year y
0 tCO2/y
Project diesel fuel consumption during the period of year y
0 kl/y
PFCD,y
Net calorific value of fossil fuel
Diesel
37.7 GJ/kl
NCVD,y
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel
Diesel
0.0687 tCO2/GJ
EFCO2,f ,D,y
Project emissions (LPG) during the period of year y
0 tCO2/y
Project LPG consumption during the period of year y
0 t/y
Net calorific value of fossil fuel
LPG
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel
LPG
50.8 GJ/t
0.0599 tCO2/GJ
Project emissions (natural gas) during the period of year y
PFCL,y
NCVL,y
EFCO2,f ,L,y
0 tCO2/y
0 1000Nm 3/y
Project natural gas consumption during the period of year y
Net calorific value of fossil fuel
Natural gas
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel
Natural gas
43.5 GJ/1000Nm3
0.051 tCO2/GJ
Project emissions (kerosene) during the period of year y
PFCN,y
NCVN,y
EFCO2,f ,N,y
0 tCO2/y
Project kerosene consumption during the period of year y
kl/y
kl/y
PFCK,y
Net calorific value of fossil fuel
Kerosene
36.7 GJ/kl
NCVK,y
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel
Kerosene
0.0679 tCO2/GJ
EFCO2,f ,K,y
[List of Default Values]
Net calorific value of fossil fuel
NCVi,y
Diesel
37.7 GJ/kl
LPG
50.8 GJ/t
Natural gas
43.5 GJ/1000Nm 3
Kerosene
36.7 GJ/kl
CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel
EFf,i,y
Diesel
0.0687 tCO2/GJ
LPG
0.0599 tCO2/GJ
Natural gas
0.051 tCO2/GJ
Kerosene
0.0679 tCO2/GJ
Units of fossil fuel
Diesel
kl/y
LPG
t/y
Natural gas
1000Nm 3 /y
Kerosene
kl/y
CO2 emission factor of electricity
EFe,y
Electricity
Emissions reduction coefficient with BEMS
0.456
EER
Office building
10 %
Commercial building
20 %
Hotel
30 %
Hospital
40 %
Other
50 %
17
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
・ The Input Sheet of the Proposed Methodology Spreadsheet consists of a table of
parameters to be monitored ex post, and parameters to be fixed ex ante, which, combined,
should provide a complete listing of the data that needs to be collected for the application
of the methodology. The tables may include data that is collected from other sources (e.g.
official statistics, expert judgment, proprietary data, IPCC Guidelines, commercial and
scientific literature, etc.), measured, or sampled. Parameters that are calculated with
equations provided in the methodology should not be included in this section.
For the “Parameters to be monitored ex post”(table 1), the following items are filled:
・ Parameter: the variable used in equations in the proposed methodology;
・ Description of data: a clear and unambiguous description of the parameter;
・ Estimated value: this field is for the project participants to fill in to calculate emission
reductions, and may be left blank in the proposed methodology.
・ Unit:
The
International
System
Unit
(SI
units
–
refer
to
<http://www.bipm.fr/enus/3_SI/si.html>)
・ Monitoring option: please select option(s) from below. If appropriate, please provide the
order of priority and the conditions when the options are chosen.
・ Option A:
Based on public data which is measured by entities other than the project
participants (Data used: publicly recognized data such as statistical data and
specifications)
・ Option B:
Based on the amount of transaction which is measured directly using
measuring equipments (Data used: commercial evidence such as invoices)
・ Option C: Based on the actual measurement using measuring equipments (Data
used: measured values)
・ Source of data: A description which data sources should be used to determine this
parameter. Clearly indicate how the values are to be selected and justified, for example, by
explaining:
・ What types of sources are suitable (official statistics, expert judgment, proprietary
data, IPCC, commercial and scientific literature, etc.);
・ What spatial level of data is suitable (local, regional, national, international).
・ Measurement methods and procedures: For option B and C, a description of the
measurement procedures or reference to appropriate standards. Provide also QA/QC
procedures.
・ Monitoring frequency: A description of the frequency of monitoring (e.g. continuously,
annually, etc).
・ Other Comments: Other input not covered by the items above.
18
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
・ Where applicable, the table “Parameters to be fixed ex ante”(table 2), should also adhere
to the instruction provided above. Data that is determined only once and remains fixed
should be considered under “I. Data and parameters fixed ex ante”.
19
JCM_MN_GL_PM_ver01.0
Annex I.
Sectoral Scopes for the JCM
1. Energy industries (renewable - / non-renewable sources);
2. Energy distribution;
3. Energy demand;
4. Manufacturing industries;
5. Chemical industry;
6. Construction;
7. Transport;
8. Mining/Mineral production;
9. Metal production;
10. Fugitive emissions from fuels (solid, oil and gas);
11. Fugitive emissions from production and consumption of halocarbons and sulphur
hexafluoride;
12. Solvents use;
13. Waste handling and disposal;
14. Afforestation and reforestation;
15. Agriculture.
20