Tax Legislative Update
Breaking news from Capitol Hill
From Grant Thornton’s Washington National Tax Office
2017-02
March 8, 2017
GOP repeal and delay of ACA taxes faces uncertain outlook
House Republicans offered legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on March
6 that would repeal or postpone $594 billion worth of ACA tax provisions over a
staggered timeline. The legislation represents the GOP’s first step toward fulfilling a
campaign promise to replace the ACA, but it faces an uncertain future on the House floor
and in the Senate.
The legislation was introduced as two separate bills that are meant to be combined into
one reconciliation bill that would allow Senate passage with a simple majority vote. Full
revenue scores are not yet available, and it is unclear whether the package will comply with
all the restrictions imposed by the reconciliation process.
The House Ways and Means Committee is scheduled to mark up the tax package on
March 8. At its heart, the tax title would repeal the excise taxes for individuals who fail to
obtain coverage and employers that fail to offer coverage. This change would be effective
retroactive for the 2016 tax year, so employers and individuals would escape tax on
upcoming returns covering last year. In place of the individual excise tax, a new provision
would allow insurers to increase premiums substantially for any 63-day lapse in coverage.
The premium tax credit that individuals currently receive for purchasing insurance on the
exchanges would be expanded in 2018 and 2019 to cover “catastrophic-only” coverage
and plans not on the exchanges, but would then be repealed for 2020. It would be
replaced by a new refundable tax credit of up to $4,000 that would be age-adjusted and
phased out beginning when modified adjusted gross income (AGI) reached $75,000 for
individuals and $150,000 for joint filers.
Most revenue-raising tax provisions in the ACA would be repealed effective beginning in
2018, including:
 3.8% Medicare tax on net investment income (NII)
 0.9% Medicare surtax on earned income over $200,000 for individuals and
$250,000 for joint filers
© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
Contacts
Mel Schwarz
Partner, Washington
National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1564
E [email protected]
Eddie Adkins
Partner, Washington
National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1565
E [email protected]
Dustin Stamper
Director, Washington
National Tax Office
T +1 202 861 4144
E [email protected]
Jeff Martin
Senior Manager, Washington
National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1526
E [email protected]
Shamik Trivedi
Manager, Washington
National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1511
E [email protected]
grantthornton.com/tax










Medical device excise tax (which would otherwise be effective again in 2018)
Health insurance industry fee (which would otherwise be effective again in 2018)
Pharmaceutical industry fee
Limit on the deductibility of salaries paid to health care executives
Ban on reimbursements for over-the-counter medication from Health Savings
Accounts (HSAs), Flexible Spending Arrangements (FSAs) and Medical Savings
Accounts (MSAs)
Increased penalties on impermissible HSA and MSA disbursements
Cap on FSAs (cap is $2,600 in 2017)
Increase from 7.5% to 10% in AGI floor for medical expense itemized deduction
(7.5% floor would be retained for taxpayers aged 65 or older in 2017)
Limit on employer deduction related to Medicare Part D subsidy
10% tax on tanning services
The legislation would not repeal the codification of economic substance doctrine, which
was enacted as part of the ACA, or the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
(PCORI) fee, which is scheduled to expire on its own in 2019. The 40% excise tax on
high-cost health plans known as the “Cadillac tax” would be delayed instead of repealed. It
was originally scheduled to become effective in 2018, was delayed until 2020 by recent
legislation and would be further delayed until 2025 under the House GOP bill.
The small business tax credit for small employers to purchase health coverage would be
repealed beginning in 2020. The ACA employer-coverage reporting requirements would
be retained, but amended. The legislation would also nearly double the limit on HSA
contributions.
Outlook
The Joint Committee on Taxation has released revenue scores for most of the provisions.
The tax title would lose an estimated $594 billion over the next 10 years without
accounting for the changes to employer and individual health coverage tax credits and
excise taxes, which the Congressional Budget Office will score.
The reconciliation process allows legislation to escape procedural hurdles in the Senate
requiring 60 votes, but comes with many restrictions. Generally, no provisions that lose
revenue outside the 10-year budget window can be included. Nearly all the tax provisions
in the House bill would lose money outside of the budget window, but there is an
exception for revenue-losing provisions that are offset with other provisions in the bill. It
is unclear whether there is enough cost savings in the rest of the bill to offset the revenue
lost by the tax provisions outside the budget window.
The bill also faces major political challenges. Conservative House Republicans have
objected to the creation of a new refundable tax credit, the retention of the Cadillac tax
and the new penalty for individuals who suffer coverage lapses. Many of these
Republicans are pushing for “cleaner” repeal that does not replace or repair many of the
ACA provisions they oppose. It may be difficult for the current package to survive a
House floor vote, although support from the administration is helping bolster its chances.
© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
Senate Republican leaders have not yet endorsed the House bill. Several moderate Senate
Republicans have criticized its effect on some ACA provisions they now support. Even
using the reconciliation process, Republicans can lose only two GOP votes in the Senate
to pass the legislation without Democratic support.
The following covers some of the tax provisions in more detail.
Medicare taxes
The ACA included two Medicare-related tax increases. For earned income over $200,000
for singles and $250,000 for joints filers, the individual portion of Medicare payroll tax was
increased 0.9% to 2.35% (making the self-employment rate 3.8%). The ACA then created
a new equivalent 3.8% tax on NII to the extent AGI exceeded $200,000 for singles and
$250,000 for joints filers. The House GOP bill would repeal both these taxes effective for
2018.
Cadillac tax
The Cadillac tax imposes a 40% tax on the value of certain health plans that exceed a set
threshold. The tax was originally meant to curb over-spending on health care and slow
cost growth, but has become very unpopular in both parties. An early draft of the House
GOP bill would have replaced this provision with a cap on the exclusion from income for
employer-provided health care.
Conservative Republicans objected to the cap, and the current bill instead retains but
further delays the effective date of the Cadillac tax from 2020 to 2025. The tax is likely
being retained only for revenue scoring reasons, and its unpopularity makes it ripe for
further delay or repeal in the future.
HSAs, MSAs and FSAs
The ACA included the following provisions on HSAs, MSAs, and FSAs in order to raise
revenue:



Ban on spending for over-the-counter medication without a prescription
Increased penalties on impermissible HSA and MSA disbursements
$2,500 yearly cap on FSA contributions (indexed and reached $2,600 in 2017)
The House GOP bill would repeal all three of these provisions and add new benefits for
HSAs. The limit on HSA contributions would be increased to equal the maximum
deductible, equivalent in 2017 to an increase from $3,400 to $6,550 for self-only coverage
and $6,750 to $13,100 for family coverage. The increase would not be effective until 2018
(maximum deductibles in 2018 not available yet). In addition, if both spouses have
attained age 55, and are thus eligible for the $1,000 catch-up contribution, and either one
has family coverage, the spouses can contribute the catch-up contribution between their
HSAs in whatever amounts they decide (including contributing the entire amount to only
one of the spouse’s HSAs). Under current law, this treatment is permitted for the regular
annual contribution limit but not for the catch-up contributions.
© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
House Republicans are very supportive of HSAs and originally proposed to make
employer HSA contributions exempt from their proposed cap on the exclusion for
employer-provided health coverage. The cap was removed in the final draft, but legislators
are likely to continue to look for additional ways to incentivize HSAs.
Industry fees
The ACA created three fees or taxes meant to require the industries expected to benefit
from health care reform to help pay for it. The 2.3% medical device excise tax is currently
suspended for sales in 2016 and 2017, and the legislation would permanently repeal it
before it takes affect again in 2018.
The health insurance industry fee was first imposed in 2014 as an $8 billion fee allocated
based on market share among all insurers with “aggregate net premiums written.” The fee
rose to $11.3 billion for 2015 and 2016, but was suspended for calendar year 2017. The bill
would repeal the fee starting in 2018, when it would otherwise be scheduled to return at a
$14.3 billion level.
The pharmaceutical industry fee was first imposed in 2011. It reached $4 billion for 2017,
but would be repealed beginning in 2018, when it would otherwise be scheduled to rise to
$4.1 billion.
Health coverage taxes and credits
The ACA created a new tax to encourage individuals without insurance to obtain
coverage, and provided a premium tax credit to help them purchase coverage on newly
created exchanges. The bill also encouraged employers to offer insurance by imposing
excise taxes for failing to offer coverage or failing to offer coverage that meets certain
standards. These provisions were deeply unpopular with Republicans, and while the
employer excise taxes would be repealed outright, the individual provisions would be
replaced with somewhat similar provisions.
The legislation would expand the Section 36B premium tax credit in 2018 and 2019 before
replacing it in 2020 with a new refundable tax credit. For 2018 and 2019, the credit could
be used on plans outside the exchange and on “catastrophic only” plans, which were
previously not permitted. However, taxpayers would be required to repay in full any
excess premium tax credit in 2018 and 2019 if income is higher than the projection used
to calculate the original credit.
In the place of a premium tax credit, the legislation would enact a new, refundable health
insurance coverage tax credit that would be used to purchase health insurance coverage.
There are certain restrictions on eligibility, and the credits, as offered, are based on the age
of the individual:



Under age 30:
Age 30 to 39:
Age 40 to 49:
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd


Age 50 to 59:
Age 60 and older:
$3,500
$4,000
The legislation would stack the credits for a family and be capped at $14,000 per year, but
would be indexed for inflation. Notably, the credits would also begin to be phased out for
single earners with modified gross income in excess of $75,000 per year (or $150,000 for
joint filers).
Both the individual and employer excise taxes would be repealed effective for 2016, so if
enacted, the bill would forgive tax from any lapses last year. However, the legislation
would require insurers to impose a 30% surcharge on the premium of any individual with
a lapse in coverage of more than 62 days. The provision would be effective for plan years
beginning in 2019, and, like the individual ACA tax, it is meant to discourage individuals
from waiting until they are sick to purchase coverage.
Other provisions
The legislation would also repeal the following provisions:





Executive compensation: The ACA limited the amount of employee pay
insurance companies could deduct to $500,000 per employee if at least 25% of
premium income comes from plans meeting creditable coverage requirements.
This provision would be repealed beginning in 2018.
Employer coverage credit: The ACA created a credit for employers with 25 or
fewer employees who offer health coverage. The current credit is 50% of
coverage costs for insurance purchased through a state exchange in the first two
years employers offer coverage but would be repealed starting in 2020.
Medicare Part D subsidy: The ACA eliminated the ability of an employer to
take a deduction for prescription drug coverage provided to employees to the
extent the employer received a retiree drug subsidy from the federal government
that was excluded from income. This deduction would be reinstated beginning in
2018.
Medical expense deduction: The ACA raised the threshold for the itemized
deduction for medical expenses from 7.5% of AGI to 10% of AGI. The change
became effective for taxpayers 64 and younger in 2012 and seniors in 2017. The
bill would repeal the change for those 64 and younger in 2018 and extend the
7.5% threshold for seniors to cover 2017 (before full repeal).
Tanning service excise tax: The bill would repeal the ACA’s 10% tax on indoor
tanning services, effective beginning in 2018.
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is
not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If
you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an
independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular
situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from
disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent
© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained
in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to
be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may
be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to
change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant
Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific
circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein.
Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this
information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the
information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any
such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.
© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd