CERTIFICATION (including PLAR) Sam DiGiandomenico Registrar Director IETO Barbara Chappell Deputy Registrar Objective Give appreciation of certification process Better understanding of what IETO does Assist you in aiding applicants PLAR – what, why, how We Set the Standard OACETT 2 Certification DEFINITION: Declare by a certificate that a person is qualified or competent (Oxford Canadian dictionary) A guarantee (thesaurus) We Set the Standard OACETT 3 Requirements for Certification Academics/Learning 3 year = technologist 2 year = technician “or equivalent” Work Experience (practical application, member oversight) Professionalism (protection of public; ethical behaviour; knowledge of common law) – Professional Practice Exam Applied Research (Technology Report) We Set the Standard OACETT 4 Process for Certification Profession (OACETT) sets a standard or level of competence: National Technology Benchmarks Technician Technologist “Currently in transition” We Set the Standard OACETT 5 Academics/Learning National Technology Benchmarks A set of competency statements for each discipline of engineering and applied science technology. A set of “General” competency statements generic to all disciplines: Technician Technologist We Set the Standard OACETT 6 Academics/Learning NTB are currently used in college accreditation 3 year = technologist 2 year = technician We Set the Standard OACETT 7 Academics/Learning General Program Criteria math, sciences, computers, communication, project management, etc. (applies to all disciplines) Discipline Specific Program Criteria need at least 5 competencies plus Applied Research for technologist We Set the Standard OACETT 8 Work Experience Minimum two years work experience Minimum of 6 months at level (technician or technologist) applying for certification Coop counts up to a maximum of 6 months credit Minimum one year in Canada (codes, laws, language) We Set the Standard OACETT 9 Professionalism Professional Practice Examination (PPE) Professional References Code of Ethics of the Association Rules of Professional Conduct We Set the Standard OACETT 10 Applied Research/Communication Ability to convey your ideas, knowledge to others (make others understand) Technology Report (for C.E.T.) We Set the Standard OACETT 11 C.Tech., C.E.T. or A.Sc.T. C.Tech. used for all technician disciplines C.E.T. used for Engineering Technology traditional disciplines, e.g. Mechanical, Electronics, Civil A.Sc.T. used for Applied Science disciplines, e.g. Building (Architecture), Chemistry, Environmental, Bioscience, Aviation Management, etc. We Set the Standard OACETT 12 Disciplines of Registration COLUMN I CORE DISCIPLINE COLUMN II ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY COLUMN III APPLIED SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY Civil/ Building/Geomatics Technology Civil Construction Engineering Technology Civil Environmental Engineering Technology Civil Municipal Engineering Technology Civil Structural Engineering Technology Civil Transportation Engineering Technology Civil Water Resources Engineering Technology Building Design Technology Building Construction Technology Building Protection Management Technology Building System Technology Geomatics Technology Geomatics Technology Hydrographics Geomatics Technology Photogrammetric Chemical/ Instrumentation/ Materials/Bioscience Technology Chemical Engineering Technology Industrial Chemical Engineering Technology: Plastics Industrial Chemical Engineering Technology: Pulp and Paper Instrumentation Engineering Technology Bioscience Technology: Agriculture Bioscience Technology: Environmental Bioscience Technology: Food Bioscience Laboratory Technology Bioscience Nephrology Technology Chemical Laboratory Technology Electrical/ Electronic/ Computer Technology Electrical Building Systems Engineering Technology Industrial Controls Engineering Technology Power Generation and Distribution Engineering Technology Automation and Robotics Engineering Technology Avionics Engineering Technology Biomedical Electronics Engineering Technology Computer Networks Engineering Technology Electronics Design Engineering Technology Telecommunications Engineering Technology Manufacturing Engineering Technology Marine Engineering Technology Mechanical Building Systems Engineering Technology Mechanical Design Engineering Technology Power Engineering Technology Industrial Engineering Technology Broadcast Communications Technology Software Technology Aviation Management Technology Industrial Management Technology Resources/Mining/ Geological Mining Engineering Technology Geology/Geophysics Engineering Technology Extractive Metallurgy Engineering Technology Petroleum Engineering Technology Forest Resources Technology Forest Recreational Technology Resource Management Technology Forestry Technology Environmental Environmental Engineering Technology: Analysis & Interpretation Environmental Engineering Technology: Prevention & Control Environmental Technology: Standards & Compliance Environmental Technology: Process Management Mechanical/ Industrial Technology We Set the Standard OACETT 13 How Determine Title Apply standard in use to education program: Competency by competency comparison Grads from accredited programs meet all academic requirements including TR Grads from non-accredited programs, may or may not meet all academics Applicant asked to complete deficient competencies We Set the Standard OACETT 14 AWARDING TITLE Graduates of: accredited programs awarded C.E.T. if engineering technology awarded A.Sc.T. if applied science (Building, Chemistry, etc.) need additional competencies to C.E.T. non accredited programs awarded C.E.T. if engineering technology after T.R. awarded A.Sc.T. if engineering technology prior to T.R. awarded A.Sc.T. if applied science; need additional competencies to C.E.T., plus T.R. We Set the Standard OACETT 15 Awarding of Certificate IETO must satisfy itself that the applicant has met all requirements Easy process for graduates from accredited programs and most Canadian programs Not so easy for other learners 70/30 rule We Set the Standard OACETT 16 Non Traditional Applicants International applicants not on IQDB Applicants who have no college/university courses Applicants with some college/university courses Certified technicians “laddering” to technologist Other We Set the Standard OACETT 17 Non Traditional Applicants Difficult to meet academic requirements: work all day courses not offered at night if courses available, takes years to complete distance prevents attendance at courses May have learned competencies in non traditional way, e.g. work, workshops, selfstudy We Set the Standard OACETT 18 Non Traditional Learning Learning outside a formal educational institution Challenge to assess learning outside traditional avenue PLAR offers additional method Prior Learning Assessment Recognition We Set the Standard OACETT 19 What Is PLAR? PLAR is a process which identifies, assesses and recognizes what a person knows and can do. PLAR is based on the principle that significant learning takes place outside of formal academic settings. PLAR is not an experience review and credit is only given for learning that can be demonstrated and verified. An applicant must understand that it is not necessarily a fast track method; it is a service to help a candidate get credit for learning which has previously occurred so the learning does not need to be repeated. PLAR is focused on what the learner knows and he or she has the primary responsibility for preparing evidence that learning has taken place with tangible proof of competence being provided. We Set the Standard OACETT 20 Timely & Relevant IETO supports PLAR and has been providing opportunities for many years to candidates with non traditional learning, or those who cannot provide the necessary credentials to demonstrate their learning, to potentially earn credit towards certification. IETO currently has an associate curve, technician curve and Special Consideration for Mature Applicants process. The IETO Rules currently state that “An examination may … be waived if through a Prior Learning Experience Review (PLAR) it can be demonstrated that an applicant has achieved the competencies that would have been achieved in a formal learning experience.” (2.5.3) In light of the increased focus being put on PLAR by governments in general and the Office of the Fairness Commission in particular, it is timely to revisit our PLAR methods and policy. We Set the Standard OACETT 21 PLAR at OACETT Recognition of prior learning should be based on demonstrated learning. The learning must be measurable. Recognition of prior learning should be consistent with the achievement levels required by the appropriate standards currently in use by IETO. Recognition of prior learning must be transparent. The candidate must know the competencies used to assess his/her skills and knowledge. Assessment of prior learning and the determination of competency/credit must be made by discipline specialists, i.e. the Admissions Committee. Recognition through prior learning should be considered equal to recognition awarded in the traditional way. An appeal process for candidates not satisfied with the PLAR assessment must be available. We Set the Standard OACETT 22 PLAR at OACETT Ultimately, IETO is assessing what a member must do, know, and comprehend based on the required competencies for each of our disciplines of registration. Knowledge, skills and abilities that meet our standards ensure technical credibility, reliability and validity deserving of our marks of certification. PLAR may be used to demonstrate either academic or experience requirements on the road to certification. It may not be used for credit towards the certification requirements of the Professional Practice Exam or Technology Report. We Set the Standard OACETT 23 Using PLAR for Academic Credit In order to be eligible to use PLAR towards academic certification requirements, the member must fit either of the two following profiles: Few academics for either C.Tech., A.Sc.T. or C.E.T. Relevant work experience Working or has clearly worked at the technician or technologist level according to the Profiles of a Technician or Technologist Good to excellent references We Set the Standard OACETT 24 Assessment Methods to be Utilized at OACETT Any one or a combination of the following methods may be used/assigned by the Admissions Committee: Technician curve Technical Exams College Courses Portfolio (may include interview) – NEW to OACETT We Set the Standard OACETT 25 Portfolios A portfolio is an excellent method for PLAR offering equal access across the province. It uses the current resources of our admissions committee. A portfolio is a collection of materials prepared to document and validate a request for recognition of previously acquired learning. It assists applicants to identify their knowledge, skills and competencies relative to predetermined benchmarks in a standard consistent format. Portfolios are suitable when a member is seeking credit for one or a number of competencies as they can be addressed in one portfolio. Portfolios should be a timelier and cost efficient method for a candidate rather than numerous technical exams. Portfolios can be undertaken by an individual as a solo endeavour or as a portfolio development course at various Ontario colleges. We Set the Standard OACETT 26 The Components of the Portfolio Cover page Table of Contents Letter of Self Introduction/Autobiographical Statement, and Attestation that the portfolio is the member’s own and that all learning represented is solely theirs unless otherwise noted (group paper for example) Goals Paper (What learning/competencies need(s) to be demonstrated) Resume/Chronological Record of Achievement Demonstration of Learning Outcomes/Competency Statements Verification of Learning – records of formal or informal learning, teaching, industrial instruction, specialized or other activities, certificates, references, notarized attestations from employers, essays, research papers demonstrating knowledge, drawings, reports, etc. Reflection/Summary Other as determined by member We Set the Standard OACETT 27 Example – Candidate 1: 20 years technologist experience; technician academics Assign missing competencies to technologist. Certification summary indicates that candidate has choice to write technical exams, find courses covering the competencies at college or prepare a portfolio if he/she can demonstrate that one or more competencies have been met through prior learning. We Set the Standard OACETT 28 Example – Candidate 2: 10 years technologist experience; associate level academics Theoretically it should be possible for someone to advance to technologist strictly through proving competencies based on PLAR. Such a candidate would most likely have extraordinary work history as well as a history of self-study and continuing education. Assign missing competencies to technologist based on extraordinary background. Certification summary indicates that candidate has choice to write technical exams, find courses covering the competencies at college or prepare a portfolio if he/she can demonstrate that one or more competencies have been met through prior learning. We Set the Standard OACETT 29 Quality Assurance The PLAR assessment must ensure that the evidence submitted by the learner is: VERIFIABLE – valid, reliable, adequate - can the candidate prove conclusive ownership of the submitted evidence? TRANSFERABLE – is there enough evidence to prove that the skill or knowledge claimed can be transferred from one context to another? (employers) CURRENT – does the evidence represent current professional/vocational levels of competency? RELATIVE - is the evidence related directly to the currently accepted standards? We Set the Standard OACETT 30 Summary In summary the certification process includes the following key components: Academics/Learning – equivalent to 2 or 3 year college program – NTB, PLAR Work experience – 2 years (1 year Canadian) Professionalism (protection of public; ethical behaviour; knowledge of common law) - PPE Communication (Technology Report) We Set the Standard OACETT 31 Questions? We Set the Standard OACETT 32
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz