THE UNlVERSXTY QF YAOUNDE UNIVERSITE DE YAOUNDE FACULTE DES LETTRES ET SCIENCES HUMAINES FACULTY OF LETTERS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF AFRICAN LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS Dipartement de Langues Africaines et Linguistique THE LIMBUM NOUN PHRASE (A GENERATIVE APPROACH) Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfifment of the requierements for the award of a postgraduate diploma "Maitrise" in Linguistics. BY MPOCHE Kizitus NFORMI (B.A. in English) Supervised by : Dr. Carl EBOBISSE (charge de Cours) University of Yaounde and Mr. TAMANJI Pius Lecturer University of Yaounde. April 1993 -- ri DEDICATION T o Friends and r e l a t i v e s o f goodwill i 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Work o f t h i s n a t u r e without the support e x t e n d my h e a r t f e l t EBOBISE and could of hardly many p e r s o n s . thanks to meet with I n t h i s respect, Dr. supervisors, my success I Carl TAMANJI P i u s f o r t h e m a r v e l l o u s j o b t h e y Mr. d i d towards t h e r e a l i z a t i o n o f t h i s p r o j e c t . Much g r a t i t u d e a l s o goes t o my i n f o r m a n t s Clement and Jamba John who bore Ndamnsa Mr. w i t h p a t i e n c e t h e many of q u e s t i o n s I asked d u r i n g t h e c o l l e c t i o n and a n a l y s i s data. My t h a n k f u l n e s s t o M r . my Ndamnsa Clement f o r l o d g i n g me f o r a b o u t two months d u r i n g my p r o j e c t i s immeasurable. I sincerely Department B.S. ,Mme of the Linguistics, Churnbow, M r . Ndongo, thank Sadembouo and M r . following who of o f f e r e d me c o u r s e s : E., Mme Zoe Ogwana John. L i n g u i s t i c s Department D r . lecturers Mme R., the Prof. Gerbault, I a l s o thank t h e head o f TADADJEU Maurice and all the members o f t h e department f o r t h e comprehension t h e y showed whenever I came up w i t h a problem. To a l l r e l a t i v e s and f r i e n d s who i n one way or the o t h e r c o n t r i b u t e d towards t h e r e a l i z a t i o n o f t h i s p r o j e c t , I e x p r e s s my g r a t i t u d e . Thanks t o my p a r e n t s for their moral and financial assistance. Thanks t o M r . F r e d e r i c k Fanwong f o r t y p i n g t h i s work. Thanks t o t h e L o r d A l m i g h t y . Eil L I S T OF ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOLS A AdJ e c t 1 ve A- Argument AM A s s o c i a t i v e marker AP A d j e c t i v a l phrase ADV. P A d v e r b i a l phrase Art. Article C complementizer cf see CL C 1 ass CP Complementizer p h r a s e D Determiner eds. Ed1t o r s E.C.P. Empty Category P r i n c i p l e Fo Immediate f u t u r e Fig. Figure F.S. Far f r o m speaker F.S.A F a r f r o m speaker and addressee GB Government and B i n d i n g Gen. P G e n e t i v e phrase H High tone 1 Inflection Interro Interrogative IP I n f l e c t i o n phrase L L o w tone k L o w f l o a t i n g tone MT mother tongue AND - iv - N Noun N.A Near addressee NP Noun phrase N.S Near speaker Po Immediate p a s t P1 Today p a s t P? Yesterday p a s t P3 Remote p a s t POSS. Possessive PP P r e p o s i t i o n a l phrase Pres. t Present tense P.S. Phrase s t r u c t u r e Pron. Pronoun R+R Referent plus referent S+A Speaker p l u s addressee SM S u b j e c t Marker S+R Speaker p l u s r e f e r e n t v Verb VP Verb p h r a s e - v -1 . LIST - 4 d i OF FIGURES Page ................... F i g . 1 1 ( 1 ) Congo-Kordofanian Languages ................. F i g . 1 1 1 ( 1 ) O r g a n i z a t i o n o f G . 6 ........................ Fig.1 ( 2 ) Simple s u b j e c t human pronouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F i g . 1 1 ( 2 ) Compound s u b j e c t human pronouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . F i g . 1 1 1 ( 2 ) Simple p r e p o s i t i o n a l o b j e c t pronouns . . . . . . . F i g . 1 ( 1 ) G r a s s f i e l d Bantu Languages Fig.1V F1g.V ( 2 ) Compound p r e p o s i t i o n a l o b j e c t pronouns ...i.... 4 10 17 17 18 18 ........................... pronouns .......................... 20 ( 2 ) Non-human pronouns Fig.VI ( 2 ) Reflexive 3 21 F i g . V I 1 ( 2 ) Possessive pronouns f o r m s f o r N.c:. D3. 5/D1 ............................................. F i g . V I I I ( 2 ) Possessive pronouns forms f o r o t h e r 1 N.cls 22 .. ...................... Fig.X ( 2 ) I n t e r r o g a t i v e pronouns ....................... F i g . X I ( 2 ) D e f i n i t e pronouns ......................... i .. F i g . X I 1 ( 2 ) I n d e f i n i t e pronouns ..................... :. . F i g . X I I I ( 2 ) Possessive d e t e r m i n e r s ..................... F i g . X I V ( 2 ) A t t r i b u t i v e a d j e c t i v e s ..................... Fig.IX ( 2 ) D e m o n s t r a t i v e pronouns 23 29 32 34 35 44 46 TABLE vi OF CONTENTS ............................................ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................... ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS ............................. i DEDICATION 1.1.3 ............................. General information on Limbum .................. Geographical Situation ......................... Historical Situation ........................... Socio-economic Situation ....................... 1.2 The Langti-.ge 1.2.1 Cias-ification iii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 1 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.2.2 ................................. Socio-linguistic Situation ..................... 1.2.3 Review o f Related literature 1.3 U 11 1.3.1 1.3.2 1.4 1.4.1 1.4.2 1.4.3 1.5 1 2 2 3 5 ................... 6 ................ Goais and Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mezhoa of work ................................. Theoretical framework .......................... The X I Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Theta Theory ................................... Projection principle ........................... Outiine of work ................................ Goais, Scope and Method of work 8 8 9 10 ~ i 12 I 13 l~ 14 2.0 14 2.1.1.2 2.1.1.3 2.1.2 Human object pronouns of prepositions ........ Non-human pronouns ........................... Reflexive P r o n o u n s .. . . ............................. __ .. .~ ~ ~..~ ...... I I; 1 !i 16 I1 16 1I 16 i ! 2.1.1 ... 11 !I .......................... Introduction ................................... Pronouns ....................................... Personal pronouns .............................. 2.1.1.1 Subject human pronouns ....................... I 8 CHAPTER TWO: THE NOUN PHRASE 2.1 ~ !, 18 ! 1 19 21 ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ . . iI .~ . ;~ .vii . ............................ ................................ 2.1.3 Possessive Pronouns 22 2.2 The modified NP 24 2.2.1 Determiners A B C D E F G H I 2.2.2 .................................... ...................... The interrogative pronoun ...................... The definite pronoun ........................... The indefinite pronoun ......................... The definite article ........................... The indefinite article ......................... Cardinal numerals .............................. The demonstrative pronoun 29 32 34 35 38 40 41 Ordinal numerals ............................... The possessive determiner ...................... 44 ..................................... 46 Adjactives ...................... The Associative NP ............................. 2.2.3 The Canplex NP ................................. 2.2.3 CHAPTER THREE: OTHER PHRASE TYPES ..................... 3 . 0 Introduction ..................................... 3.1 The inflection phrase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2 The prepositional phrase ......................... 3 . 3 The adjectival phrase ............................ 3.4 The verb phrase .................................. CHAPTER FOUR: CONCLUSION .............................. 4 . 0 Summary o f work .................................. 4.1 Limitations ...................................... 4.2 Significance of project .......................... BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................... A 29 The attributive adjective 43 46 47 48 56 56 56 58 62 63 69 69 70 71 12 . ! I i CHAPTER ONE . 4 I. INTRODUCTION GENERAL INFORMATION ON LIMBUM 1.1 GEOGRAPHICAL S I T U A T I O N 1.1.1 L i means language and mbum to refers the speakers. i s t h e r e f o r e t h e language o f t h e Mbum p e o p l e who a r e Limbum r e f e r r e d t o as Wimbum. The Wimbum occupy t h e n o r t h e r n e x t e n s i o n o f t h e Bamenda - Highlands the Donga-Mantung Cameroon. middle Division The belt of region the lies 1 1 0 2 0 ' ' E and l a t i t u d e 6 0 2 0 " of North between Nkambe West plateau Province of of l o n g i t u d e 1 0 ° 2 5 " and and 6040'' N. P I E T E R ( 1 9 6 6 ) says t h a t t h e s p e a k e r s o f Limbum who have often been r e f e r r e d t o as n s u n g l i by t h e lamnss? and Yamba speakers number w e l l above 7 0 . 0 0 0 w i t h some mbum communities i n t h e Adamawa a r e a . P I E T E R and VOORHOEVE ( 1 9 7 7 ) s t a t e t h a t t h e language o r i g i n a t e d as p a r t o f t h e o u t e r Mbarn-Nkam g r o u p of Bantu meaning b u t ALCAM ( 1 9 8 3 : 7 ) g i v e s i t number 903 languages that it belongs to the of subgroup eastern g r a s s f i e l d languages. Limbum i s b o r d e r e d by Mbembe i n t h e n o r t h , d z o d i n k a and rnfumte i n t h e n o r t h e a s t , Yamba i n t h e e a s t , souEh, Speakers n33ni of Donga-Mantung .in the the south language Division Nkambe. - 1 - west occupy including the n s a r i i n t h e west. and about the Lamnso? i n 24 villages divisional in capital I - 2 HISTORICAL S I T U A T I O N 1.1.2 H i s t o r i c a l l y , t h e Wimbum a r e Tikari e a r l y F u l a n i wars. groups. intermixed clans. (1967 to of be the and t o have come t o t h e h i g h l a n d s d u r i n g t h e origin distinct believed T h e y a r e b e l i e v e d t o have come i n three Wart-, Tang, and Ya w h i c h today form t h r e e FIORE ( 1 9 7 7 ) and CHILVER KAYBERRY and 2 8 ) Share t h i s v i e w on t h e h i s t o r i c a l o r i g i n o f p.27, t h e Tang and Ya g r o u p s b u t J e f f r e y s ( 1 9 6 3 ) holds that He i s o f Warr p e o p l e d i d n o t o r i g i n a t e f r o m somewhere e l s e . t h e o p i n i o n t h a t t h e y were n a t i v e s o f the area the and spoke Limbum b e f o r e t h e coming o f t h e o t h e r g r o u p s . is It really difficult t o draw a c l e a r c u t l i n g u i s t i c other d i s t i n c t i o n w i t h i n the three clans FIORE (1977) provides because example, Mbot, which that i n every d i a l e c t a l region, v i l l a g e s b e l o n g i n g t o each o f t h e For than three clans are found. and Mbaa o f Warr o r i g i n a r e f o u n d Wat under t h e c e n t r a l v a r i e t y which i s supposed t o be made up o f v i l l a g e s o f t h e Tang c l a n . 1.1.2 SGCIO-ECONOMIC The Wimbum SITUATION live in a i n d u s t r i e s ana c o n s e q u e n t l y rural few area. non-natives There live are in no the area. Economically, the Wlmbum are very dynamic. p r a c t i s e much a g r i c u l t u r e and have abundant l a n d The women do most of themselves c h i e f l y i n commerci a1 a c t i v i t i e s the hunting, . for They this. farmwork w h i l e t h e men engage animal rearing and other - 3 - THE 1.2 LANGUAGE CLASSIFICATION 1.2. 1 de Wolf in t two (1971) classifies main groups grassfield namely Bantu languages West and Mbam-Nkam. which c o n s i s t s o f a c l u s t e r o f i n t e r - c o m p r e h e n s i b l e Limbum dialects spoken i n t h e Nkambe a r e a belongs t o t h e Mbam-Nkam group. GRASSFIELO BANTU [ MBAM-NKAM WESTEilN G R A S S F I E L D NKAMBE LIMBUM (Fig.1) (Adapted f r o m de Wolf ( 1 9 7 1 ) ) Greenberg o n h i s p a r t c l a s s i f i e s A f r i c a n languages i n t o 4 major l i n g u i s t i c f a m i l i e s . 1 ) Congo-Kordofanian 2) N i l o - S a h a r i a n 3 ) Afro-Asiatic 4) Khoisari Of these represented 4 in main Cameroon. Congo-Kordofanian f a m i l y . belonging families, the Limbum first three are falls under the I t i s a g r a s s f i e l d Bantu language t o t h e Benue-Congo s u b d i v i s i o n of t h e Niger-Congo - A - family. The language Grassfield Bantu. belongs to the northern of group This i s ver fiable on the chart below: Congo-Kordofanienne I Adamaoua Oubanguiem I II 1 Limbum dzodinka mfumte (Fig.11) (Adapted from ALCAM ( 1 9 8 3 ) ) Yamba mba? - 5 SOCIOLINGUISTIC S I T U A T I O N 1.2.2 Limbum i s spoken by t h e Wimbum dialectal variations. of speakers the of mutually. to discrepancies language. the PIETER quite a lot of The d i f f e r e n c e s a r e m o s t l y t o n a l and phonemic and t h e s e l e a d system with the writing s p i t e o f these d i f f e r e n c e s , In various in areas understand each other ( 1 9 7 7 ) f i r s t distinguished the v a r i e t i e s as: Western r Nothern v ( wat ) (Nkambe) Central (Tabenken 1 Southern (Ndu) South Western (Taku) F I O R E ( 1 9 7 7 ) C l a s s i f i e s t h e v a r i e t i e s on t h e pronunciation i n t o N o r t h e r n , C e n t r a l and Southern. basis To h e r , t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e language a r e due t o t h e i n f l u e n c e t h e languages i n t h e n o r t h and s o u t h of Variety Northern t h e Wimbum area. L o c a t ion Binshua, Nkambe, K u n g i , Moo, E i , Binka, N j a p , Nge, Chup, and Tabenken Luh, Taku, Talla, of Centra1 Wat, Mbot, and Ngarum Southern Ndu, Ntumbaw, Wawo, Mbipgo, N t u n d i p , Sop, of - 6 - and Sinna. FIORE holds that there the varieties and that greatly influenced by the is "Kolanut" pronounced is inter-relationship between the Northern and the Southern are Central in variations with For variety. example, the various The North will pronounce it as bi while the regions. and Central the latter pronounce it as rbi. option pronunciation of is In most works in Limburn, adopted. m-n-dip is There "water" which varies. m-n-dip in the Central South but also the In the North, it is in the it South is The former pronunciation is adopted in most m-n-dzip. in Limbum. Apart from Limbum, there is also Pidgin whicu is spoken in the area though not widely spread. v This is mostly spoken by the youths probably as a result o f education o r contact frequent with members of other speech communities especially in schools. 1.2.3 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATIRE Relatively much has been written on Limbum though very in general little or nothing at all exists on syntax. In this section, there will be a brief discussion on past works on the language that directly concern this study. will just be mentioned for the sake o f future the language. Of great importance is NFORGWEI Others research .. (1991). dissertation, among other things, he treats nouns in In on his Limbum - 7aand attempts their classification. d .d this study important to that it helps in the collection of data and in resolves some is This problems of orthography. He also treats pronouns and adjectives which have been o f great help in the analysis of the modified NP in this study. In addition HYMAN treat yrassfields noun class system of Limburn. and (1981) exhaustively VOORHOEVE classes amongst which is the noun This has been of much use to this dissertation in that it has facilitated the determination o f the various forms of the determiner. system It i s the Class noun proposed by VOORHOEVE in this document that has been adopted for our present study. Moreover, there is MFONYAM ( 1 9 8 8 ) who establishes there are 3 phonemlc contour tones in Limbum. the low and level tones (H,M,L)and 5 glides o r He proposes the combinations of low orthography o f Bantu languages. adopted in this study that of only and other tones in the This because marking proposition is not a non-native speaker will hardly easily predict the unmarked tone. Apart. from the above, there are other works on There i s and BRADLEY HIGGENS (1985) who worked on "Limbum Language Learning Course", N D I et a1 ( 1 9 8 3 ) who first and Limbum. produced a second primer to teach reading Limbum, and MBURU and BOMNSA ( 1 9 7 4 ) who in trying to establish a foundation in Limbum linguistics published "An introduction to Limbum". We also have PECK ( 1 9 7 4 ) who concentrates mostly on words PIETER and and their VOORHOEVE ( 1 9 7 7 ) translations English. also published "Gender in a n d o t h r r \,:or:k form t h e b u l k of Liabux. into linguistic Limbum These literature on Limbum". - 7b / TABLE OF CONCORDS IN L I M B U M - - '0 '0 pl p- 8' 8' 8' 0 o' a' A) la 8- n- y'p yf A- &- yC h2 1,9 n- n- Y:@ yf 8- 6- yC 0- 00- 9- B1 2,8 P- P- ULP p V(- Vi- V i p- n- p- wLp p yf- yi- vi p- m-n- ulp ul p vf- p- V- p Q- v{vr- vf p- pp- W<"t p- 6- 4- pll p- p- WL p vi- h- w5-u; pl- a'- 6- P- P- P- u- v{- vf- 0- vf- p- 0- YIQ P a- h- 0: p- '(2 2 8 us'ui us,) 8' 8' P- y q V- Vf- :1 3 yLg :2 7 n@ y- g0@- y'0 0- 5 r- 6a m- B2 83 P- 0- 0' 0- '0 Pply(P- Pp- 0' 54 55 '6 (1 :3 I '2 0 10 vf- hvi- vf 0- 8- yig yiyf- yiyf- y i y l 0- r- ilr r ti- t i 8- t- m- mlm m ni- t{mi- mi m- m- (m-) m- yf- a- '0 Pyf- - 0- - 0' 8yi yi p- m- '0 '0 '0 mlp il- '3 p i- 0'- m-n- m- mLm m mi- mi- ni n- 0- y-8 p yi- yf- y{ 8- v i - Byl- 0- 0' 8- '0 - 7c The rioun c l a s s s y s t e m p r o p o s e d for Limbum by VOORHOEVE. A$/B1 b i r d , e l e p h a n t , g o r i l l e , lamp, r o p e , s t o n e 0-si'q Az/Bz /B3 / "chief" p- bushcow, d o g , l e o p a r d m-bjq ~ z / B 3 "bird" chief, thief o-kf? A2 / p- / p- 'I b u s h c o w 'I a n i m a l , a x e , b e l t , body, b r a n c h , f i y , god, chimpanzee, house, k n i f e , male, m a r k e t , monkey, s n a k e , s o u p , v e g e t a b l e . m-Sa / m - n - "animal" n - j & a / m-ii- "axe" / b- A2 /B.I m-53 A2 / 8 5 q-k&r / p- friend" A2 /B6 n-dGu / b- "husband" A2 /SI q-wLc / b-&e I' A2/1O / m- "goat" bark, c r a b , d a y , gun, h e a r t , message, nose, 5 - j i i / m-iiCz/Bi pe r s o n 'I g o a t , h e n , rat,, s h e e p in-bG Ci/B3 c h i 1d " I' back" b a g , bamboo, b o n e , c l o t h , e a r , h e a d , h o e , h o l e , b a n a n a l e a f , m o u t h , p l a c e , t r a p , t r e e , c o u n t r y , yam 0-bSa / b- "bag" C I /Ds n-fi.e / m-n- 'I leg" Cz / D I 0-b5 / m- 'I hand Cz /D3 0-koo vt f o o t 'I c3 /xz y-ii " t h i ng " 5/D1 root, s l a v e , t a i l / / b- m-0- a r m , belly, b r e a s t , death, egg, eye, feather, horn, kola, m a t , m o u n t a i n , n a i l , name, n a v e l , n e t , p a l m t r e e , p e p p e r , p o t , t h r o a t , t o n g u e , t o o t h , work i - 7d r - k j 3 / m- 5/Dz r-kaa / m- 5/D3 r-gi. / m - 0 - Ai maize, rain, " c a d a v e r '' " m a i z e '' tobacco rain m-b&n Bi hridge, b r a i n , bed, bloos, bridge" " c 1o u d " 0-sa " cornbeer" r-boo "sky" co1.11, h a i r m-m- bZ7 CZ 5 D3 cornbeer, ashes b e a n s , f a t , o 1, s a l i v a , s a l t , w a t e r , m e d i c i n e , wine m-0-k 10 f a c e , t h o r n , wing " b-r&a B3 d e b t '' i r o n , war 0-kwg A2 arm o " be a n s " b e e , cowry, d u s t , f i r e , f i r e w o o d , f i s h , f r u i t ii-h '' be e '' m- b a b i '' c o w r y " OF WORK GOALS, SCOPE AND METHOD 1.3 GOALS AND SCOPE 1.3.1 PROPELCA has Limbum as one of the languages due to go on area extension soon. As a result, this study is aimed at what has already been written on Limbum so as to increasing facilitate the teaching and particular and learning of the language in mother tongue (MT) education in Cameroon in general. Besides, this dissertation is aimed at NP the in Limbum with focus on the internal structure as we 1 as the linear and hierarchical order 1% describing of elements within the simple and modified NPs. The choice of this topic has been triggered by the 1ack of or little work on syntax in Limbum as areas of study phonology. on in the language such other as morphology and This study therefore aims at laying a foundation Limbum Syntax. METHOD.OF WORK 1.3.2 This Yaounde. words, research has been carried out The work has been based on a corpus 150 phrases as exclusively in of about 500 well as a collection of vital data from what has already been done in Mr. to opposed Limbum. My informants Ndamnsa Clement aged 2 8 , working with Cameroon National Family Welfare (CAMNAFAW) and John Jarnba aged 2 2 , a student - 9 - i n the University o f Yaounde did the oral translation from English to Limbum. d I i have sometimes used my little of the knowledge language to ask them tricky questions that have gone a long way to clarify the doubts that I have had in my analysis. The initial step consists in the syntactic analysis o f the NP in order to bring out the various elements that the n o u n ( N ) in Limbum and indicate the linear order modify of these s a t e i i ~ t e s within the modified NP in the language. After every analysis of the N and a modifier, a phrase structure (PS) rule will be postulated. In the final analysis, the PS rules shall be so as to come up with a single generalized PS rule that can generate the 1.4 collapsed NP THEORETIC& The fi i n Limbum. FRAMEWORK theoretical $1 orientation this-”fT for adopted ~ “dissertation is that of government and binding ( G B ) which is %generative transformational / ‘well-formed sentences are syntax. It deals with generated in a language. how The study brings out rules which show the structural arrangement of elanierits ‘iri a sentence, describes the relations that the various elements have in the form, interpret and sentence, pronounce and shows The how to sentences in the language. This theory i s one o f the most current theories in Syntax. overall organization o f ( G E ) with all its components 1s shown below: [q4 ‘iI.. - 10 Theory, e-Theory Xi <-- move a - Projection Principle 8-cr it e r i on Phonetic f o r m Fig.111 The s u b - t h e o r i e s o f GB t h a t study include the Xi directly relate t h e o r y (X-bar t h e o r y ) , ( @ - t h e o r y ) and t h e p r o j e c t i o n p r i n c i p l e to this t h e t a theory which are briefly p r e s e n t e d below: T H E X’ 1.4.1 This 1970s. for THEORY is (X-BAR THEORY) a t h e o r y t h a t was developed by Chomsky i n t h e I t i s a more adequate and more g e n e r a l i z e d n o t a t i o n c h a r a c t e r i z i n g p h r a s a l and s e n t e n t i a l s t r u c t u r e s . This t h e o r y e s t a b l i s h e s t h a t any p h r a s e i n any human language has a head w h i c h g i v e s t h e p h r a s e i t s e s s e n t i a l c h a r a c t e r . head c o n t r o l s t h e o t h e r e l e m e n t s w h i c h a r e i n related to it within the phrase. l e x i c a l ( i t e m ) c a t e g o r y such as N , V, turn The Closely The head i s u s u a l l y a P, A , e t c . - - 11 X-bar theory recognizes 3 levels of projection: phrasal level or projection level ( X ' l ) , maximal level (Xl) and the zero or word level level relates as used category. above It VP, A?, a is captures PP, IP, variable linguistic over elements mean to the any syntactic generalizations. hierarchical elements within a phrase or sentence. is understood Maximal etc. ADV.P, X-bar theory extablishes the linear and of The semi-phrasal (X). the maximal projection to the head. projections include NP, X the semi-phrasal The order Linear order here successive occurence the of while hierarchical order has to d o with the manner in which lower level categories combine to form higher level categories. 1.4.2 THETA THEORY is This that make u p believes that ( 6 THEORY) a theory part of any that provides semantic information the lexicon of any lexical item must belong to a syntactic category. The theory then assigns 8-roles such patient, goal, to arguments. information source, 8-role given subcategorized for. subcategorization genitive here is about This which etc. understood the element information is the to [-NP agent, various mean the which has been given within give item, information and with about the nature of the element that is subcategorized for. Example: Eat as a frame which specifies the kind o f element that can come after the lexical restrictions GB grammar. + edible] selection semantic Within the realm i ri e-theory, matter what movement operation undergo, the role must not change. in any construction, only that is e-criterion there states that once a role is attributed to a structure, which no of - 12 particular e-role structure may e-criterion also holds one element bears a and a particular e-role is assigned only The to one element. that elements have that the ability to assign e-roles are verbs and prepositions. 1.4.3 PROJECTION P R I N C I P L E This is a well-formedness condition on syntactic representation which establishes a kind of relation between the requirements of lexical items and the syntax which fills those requirements. The principle states that Syntactlc representations the 1ex:con the lex?cal contain. in that properties are projected from they uniformly observe of the (RADFORD (1988 Syntactic representations i s here structures items they p.54) understood to mean that we get after the projection of the lexicon. Uniformly observed here implies that the lexical properties of an item must be respected at all levels of representation (Deep struturz, Surface Structure o r Logical and phonetic form). In summary therefore, the projection principle assigns appropriate lexical items 13 to i, appropriate nodes of tree structures built out of P.S. rules. OUTLINE OF WORK 1.5 Four chapters make up introductory and is aimed at what the work of presentation a The study. acquainting is all about. and scope of the study, this the first is with reader In it, we have the objective review of related literature, theoretical framework, general information on the language and its speakers, as well as the outline of the work. Chapter two is concerned with the analysis o f the NP in Lirnbum. the NP It examines the internal constituent structure of and establishes the linear and hierarchical order of the modifiers o f the head N. The third chapter takes a look at tries in relation to constructions. other It constituent types structures in larger also shows the relationship between the and other phrase types and linguistic phrase to determine the position of occurence of the NP and NP other generalizations brings that out the significant characterize the various phrase types. Chapter four which is the last contains the work, problems a summary of faced during research, significance of the project and suggestions for future research. CHAPTER T W O THE NOUN PHRASE 2.0 INTRODUCTION ORE YUSUF ( 1 9 9 2 p . 5 ) d e f i n e s t h e noun phrase ( N P ) as: ... t h e c a t e g o r y t h a t codes t h e p a r t i c i p a n t s e v e n t o r s t a t e d e s c r i b e d by t h e v e r b . The NP i s headed b y t h e Noun ( N ) , o r pronoun (when i t w i l l n o t be m o d i f i e d ) . . The "head" of a phrase i s t h e S i n g l e word t h a t can s t a n d f o r t h e whole c o n s t r u c t i o n ; i t i s t h e s i n g l e lexical i t e m t h a t can r e p l a c e t h e whole phrase. i n the . G e o f f r e y Leech and Jan S v a r t v i k ( 1 9 7 5 , p.251) say t h a t : A noun p h r a s e i s a p h r a s e w h i c h can a c t as s u b j e c t , o b j e c t o r complement o f a c l a u s e o r p r e p o s i t i o n a l complement. I t is c a l l e d a noun phrase because t h e word w h i c h 1s I t s head i s typically a noun. From t h e above d e f i n i t i o n s , coup ed w i t h e x i s t i n g n Limbum c o n s t i t u t e s a i t can be s a i d t h a t an NP on Limburn, head word ( n o u n o r pronoun) with 0 Without When t h e NP i s made IJP o f t h e head word a l o n e , be a simple "groundnuts", "house", In baa 0-gwi. satellites, Examples NP. "bag", "dog" in m-baa etc. When data Limbum satellites. it i s said t o include: biran "money" kwa "mal ze" n-dap the head word has t i l e NP i s d e s c r i b e d as m o d i f i e d or complex. Limbum, the NP-functions as subject, complement i n 3 sentence as i l l u s t r a t e d below: - 14 - object or 1 15 m33 yi ir,-kvir yo n-ye child of chief is thief - "The c h i l d o f t h e c h i e f i s a t h i e f " (subJ ) ( p r e p ObJ) (camp) A l t h o u g h b o t h t h e noun and t h e pronoun, w h i c h are heads of the NP can f u n c t i o n as u n m o d i f i e d NPs, only i n Limbum, t h e head N can be m o d i f i e d as i s e v i d e n t f r o m the examples below: m53 2 (a) ( b ) *ye Ca child him this birair, cS rnber groundnuts c '' R aw (e) ( d ) *"wap mango (c5) nsi c " As b3 okip hand left (f) be * black raw cane mbviru that white *"white t h a t " (h) * b-ca b- bog bbq these good *"Good t h e s e " L e f t hand " can mber *"Raw t h e i r s " " u n r i p e mango" (s) cZ. theirs c raw g r o u ndn u t s " n-gst-5 this * " T h i s him" "This c h i l d " (cj Ch n o t i c e d above, any a t t e m p t t o m o d i f y an NP which i s a pronoun ( P r o n ) l e a d s t o u n g r a m m a t i c a l i t y . Pronouns which possessive 16 mostly pronouns, - serve reflexive as NPs is pronouns Limbum and are personal pronouns. 2.1 PRONOUNS PRYSE ( 1 9 8 4 p . 3 ) are used instead d e f i n e s pronouns a s : of nouns to avoid "...words which t h e awkwardness of r e p e a t i n g names c o n s t a n t l y i n one s e n t e n c e " . I n Limbum, t h e r e a r e human and non-human can replace nouns earlier pronouns which mentioned i n a d i s c o u r s e . The non-htiman pronouns f u n c t i o n o n l y as s u b j e c t s w h i l e t h e human counterparts have d i v e r s e d f o r m s which mark s u b j e c t , o b j e c t of v e r b and o b j e c t o f p r e p o s i t i o n . PERSONAL PRONOUNS 2.1.1 P e r s o n a l pronouns a r e a group o f words which o f t h e name o f a p e r s o n o r a t h i n g . place s e r v e s as a s u b j e c t , case and when it i t i s said to assume serves an object, as stand in When t h e pronoun the nominative i t assumes t h e a c c u s a t i v e case. 2.1.1.1 SUBJECT PRONOUNS In Limbum, t h e r e e x i s t s i m p l e s u b j e c t human pronouns as well as compound s u b j e c t human pronouns as shown I and I 1 r e s p e c t i v e l y : on f i g u r e s - 17 - S i m p l e S u b j e c t human Pronouns Person Singular - Limbum Plural English Limbum English 1s t mZ me wer we 2nd WZ YOU wee you 3rd e wowee they he/she . (Fig.1) Compound S u b j e c t human Pronouns Persons Singular Gloss 1 +2 s37 we ( S + A ) 1C 3 wer we 2+3 3+3 Plural 'Gloss see we ( S + A s ) (S+R) W er we yee you ( A + R ) yee you ( A + R s ) wowee they wowee they (R+R) (S+Rs) (R+Rs) ( F i g . 11) These pronouns a r e used as subjects in below: 3 (a) mZ mb& Ye kw5 I P2 eat maize "I a t e maize" (b) wer a mbi! ye kwa we(i+3) sm P2 eat mai z e "we a t e maize" (c) s57 a mbi! so7sf n-yor we(l+Z) sm P1 wash self/body "We t o o k a b a t h " "we washed o u r s e l v e s " the examples (d) 18 - yee a Ye m- baa you(2+3) sm eat money "You have s p e n t money" 2.1.1 HUMAN OBJECT PRONOUNS OF P R E P O S I T I O N S 2 There also prepositions exist which are simple used and compound as o b j e c t s i n Limbum. pronouns can be seen on f i g u r e s typeJof of IOU These I 1 1 and I V below: Simple P r e p o s i t i o n a l object.pronouns SIn g u l a r Person Gloss Plural Gloss 1 mi me wer we 2 W& YOU wee YOU wowee them 1 3 ye h 1 m/her ( F i g . 111) Compound p r e p o s i t i o n a l O b j e c t Pronouns Persons Singular G1 oss Plural II Gloss 1 +? S5? we (S+A) see we ( S + A s ) 113 ,we r we (S+R) we r we ( S + R s ) 2+3 yee you ( A + R ) yee you (A+Rs) wbw5e they ( R + R ) wbwee they (R+Rs) 3+3 ' (Fig. I V ) The sentences below i l l u s t r a t e t h e pronouns : use of some of these I 4 (a) mi fa ni wowee I give to them 19 - "I have given to them" (b) fa ni mZ give to me "Give to me" (c) e k5 SB Ye he take from him "He has taken from him" (d) e k5 S6 w6wee he take from them "He has taken from them" The human pronouns that substitute for berb objects\, , i.n < ~~~~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~~ . ~~~ ~ ~ Limbum are not ~ ~ ~ different from the pronounshf preposition . ~. -\,-----~~ ~~ already discussed above. -~___----- 2.1.1.3 As NON-HUMAN PRONOUNS earlier mentioned in 2.1, Limbum function as subjects only. class of the nouns which they below shows the various non-human in Their forms depend on the substitute forms pronouns of for. The table non-human pronouns in Limbum and their corresponding noun classes. ~ ~~~~ - 20 Plural Singular Gloss N.cl. mi i t , they D3, yi/vi it, ther A l l others li a - 5/D1 The use o f t h e s e pronouns as s u b j e c t s i s i l l u s t r a t e d i n the sentences below. The noun which i s s u b s t i t u t e d f a r i s i n oaranthesis. 5 (a) l i (rbi) i t (Kolanut) rnbij bkte P2 rotten "It got r o t t e n " (b! & (n-wa?) I t (book) rnbij b&te P2 rotten "It got rotten" ( c ) m i (rn-n-dip) it (water) rnbij k&te P2 sp111 " I t s D i 1 led" ( d ) v i (b-n-wa?) they (books) "They g o t t o r n " mbG sasi P2 tear - - 21 REFLEXIVE PRONOUNS 2.1.2 Reflexive pronouns are in formed Limbum by (body or self) to the possessive adjectives which we "nyor" (I) below: have in 2 . 2 . 1 I I Singular Plural I English / Limbum English ya-nyor myse 1 f yer-nyor ou rse1 ves yo- n yor yourself yGe-ny6r yoursel vs yi-nyor hi msel f/ herself/ itself wap-nyor themselves (Fi g.VI ) Examples o f sentences with reflexive pronouns are: 6 (a) mi gee ni y a-ny6r I do with myself " I have dealt with myself'' (b) e bi VG mbena ni yi-nyor he Fo come here with himself "He will come here (c) adding - 0 bi VG mbena ni wap-ny6r they Fo come here with themselves "They will come here themselves" -- . . 2.1.3 POSSESSIVE PRONOUNS These pronouns whlch mark dependent. Taklng into class system for Llmbum below nouns shows of the consideratlon by VOORHOEVE possessive class ( 5 / D 1 ) . possession Figure are the VI11 shows Plural 18 ma mi ne 1 0 mo yours li mi his the Gloss 1 isee mi see ours 16 mem yours 1 ap map theirs Singular Plural YS Wh mine YO WO yours Yi Vi his I wer/visee Figure VI1 forms of mass nouns ( D 3 ) and Singular yer, yisee class proposed noun (1981), forms of the rest of the nouns in Limbum. 3 noun Gloss ours yee wee yours Y aP wap theirs - possessive - 23 - The use o f some o f these pronouns is exemplified in the sentences below: 7 (a) baa bag ca a YA this is mine "This bag is mine" (b) m33 a Ca child yer/yisee is o u r s this "This child is ours" (c) rbi cane a 10 Kolanut that is yours "That Kolanut is yours" (d) m-bi m-cena a map Kolanuts those theirs are "Those Kolanuts are theirs" The pronouns concern this unmodified part NPs discussed above are those which directly of in the dissertation. Limbum. NFORGWEI They There shall be more on as (199.1) also treats pronouns in Limbum though not in the same light as study. serve pronouns in this in subsequent sections . From the above analysis, the possible PS rule that can generate an NP that consists only o f a pronoun o r a noun is: i \ i Q - 24 P J rule I NP - > [Pron will In the next section of this study, there examination of the be an modified NP and the various satellites that make UP such an NP. THE MODIFIED NP 2.2 The modified NP is an NP that consists of an obligatory N with modifying elements. head In Limbum, these modifying elements can be premodifiers or postmodifiers. Welmers ( 1 9 7 3 p.249) holds that "Many works on Languages... show a remarkable sophistication in their treatment Talking about Niger-Congo languages in particular, (p.250) he says: " forms ... used lack of it should be recognized as noun modifiers of African noun that linguistic modifiers.'' the status of in these languages, and o f relat.ed forms, is intrinsically difficult to define." In this wise, he prefers using the term "adjectivals "to define the satellites that accompany the noun in a modified NP. While Welmers's "adjectivals" is conflates the welcome because categories of determiners and adjectives and thus limits our inventory of categories, there seems no empirical Limbum. it evidence to support such to be a proposition in Any attempt to analyse determiners as adjectives in Limbum will lead to a number of problems. First, there is supposed to be a distinction between - 25 - t h e d e t e r m i n e r and t h e a d j e c t i v e w h i c h s t a t e s t h e qualities o f t h e noun as can be seen i n t h e examples below: 8 (a) 0-we Ca person this " T h i s man" (b) " 0 - ~ 2 mbviru person white w h iteman " Besides, right of the a d j e c t i v e s can be s t a c k e d i n d e f i n i t e l y t o t h e head N they modify. This distributional e v i d e n c e makes them d i f f e r e n t f r o m d e t e r m i n e r s which c a n n o t be r e c u r s i v e l y s t a c k e d t o t h e head N w h i c h t h e y d e t e r m i n e . 9 (a) 0-gwa bbnb60 cG nsi wife goodgood c black "The v e r y good d a r k i n c o m p l e x i o n w i f e " cena ca cat that this *"This that Cat" (b) *rwC -- Moreover, d e t e r m i n e r s e distributions when - they ani adjectives have fferer; -- . . ~ I . ~ - a r e used t o g e t h e r t o m o d i f y an N. The d e t e r m i n e r always jjrecedes t h e a d j e c t i v e . r 10 r,,? m-bvk nsi goat black h ' i / \ i/ j good my - \ "my b l a c k g o a t " friend 26 ! " M Y good f r i e n d " (c) Yb m- baa mfi your money new "Your new money" I n a d d i t i o n , d e t e r m i n e r s can be c o o r d i n a t e d w i t h the determiners of coordinated with same others type of the just same as a d j e c t i v e s can be type. d e t e r m i n e r s c a n n o t be c o o r d i n a t e d w i t h a d j e c t i v e s . t h e examples below: 1 1 ( a ) n-dap house ca 0 cena this and that " T h i s and t h a t house" ( b ) kwa maize mber ce nfi raw c new "Raw f r e s h mai Ze" other However, Consider (c) * - 27 Cena o kw.3 mber That and maize raw * " T h a t and raw maize" Furthermore, adjectives can r e d u p l ic a t e d be m o r p h o l o g i c a l l y t o l a y emphasis on t h e degree o f t h e q u a l i t y a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e noun b u t determiners do not have this morphological p r o p e r t y . " A v e r y good b a s k e t " ( b ) njinwF5 woman ntatap hard hard " A v e r y h a r d woman" (C) * b-laba? b-cB CB shoes these these *"These t h e s e shoes" Finally, adjectives r e s t r i c t i o n than determiners. specific nouns. have a Specific stricter selection adjectives modify This r e s t r i c t i o n i s r i g i d with adjectives b u t l i b e r a l w i t h determiners. R iii - 28 j /I 13 (a) q-w2 fee person sense "intelligent person" (b) *kao fee pan sense *"Intel 1 igent pan" (c) n-w& cena person that "That person" (d) kao cena pan that "That pan" The use of the adjective fee "intelligent" is to humans but limited use of the determiner cena "that" goes the with both animate and inanimate things. Having examined the distinction between determiners and adjectives, it is clear that descriptive adequacy will be achieved if t h e two categories are not conflated. In the discussion o f the modifiers of the head N follows, determiners will be treated as category different from that of adjectives. which belonging to a - 29 - DETERMINERS 2.2.1 As earlier mentioned, head N. In pronoun, the indefinite the determiner determines the Limbum, determiners include the demonstrative interrogative pronouns, pronoun, the definite and the definite and indefinite articles, and the ordinal and cardinal numerals. The demonstrative Pronouns A In Limbum, there are demonstratlve form that deslgnate Objects near speaker (NS), ObJects far from speaker (FS) and near the addressee ( N A ) and ObJects addressee ( F . S . A ) . from speaker and This is illustrated on the table below: Other Classes All N.Cl. ' D3 and 5/D1 Plural Singular Limbum Gloss Limbum far Gloss b-ca cane that (FS) (NA) b-cane b-yana those (FS)(NA) in-cane cena that b-cena those (FSA) m-cena (FSA) these m-ca this (NS) (NS) (Fig.IX) The column to the extreme right shows forms which are used mostly with mass nouns ( D 3 ) there are some demonstrative forms. non-mass but one nouns which finds out that take the same There is the example of "Kolanut" rbi which belongs to noun class 5/D1. / 14 (a) rbi Kol anut " - Ca m- b i m-cti this Kolanuts these T h is Ko 1an u t '' ( b ) rbi 30 cane "These K o l a n u t s " m-bi m-yana yana Kolanut that "That Kolanut" ( c ) rbi Kolanut m-cane Kol a n u t those "Those K o l a n u t s " cena m-bi m-cena that Kol a n u t s those "That Kolanut" ( d ) m-n-dip water "Those K o l a n u t s " m-ca this "This water" ( c ) m-n-dip m-cane m-yana water " that That water " ( f ) m-n-dip water '' T h a t m-cena that water '' As can be seen i n t h e examples i n 14 and the various , demonstrative forms in - 31 figure the IX, forms of the d e m o n s t r a t i v e pronouns a r e noun c l a s s dependent i n Limbum. The most p r o b a b l e reason why k o l a n u t and w a t e r t a k e t h e same form f o r t h e d e m o n s t r a t i v e s h o u l d have been belong to one c l a s s b u t VOORHOEVE ( 1 9 8 1 p.189-90) them as b e l o n g i n g There is that no to classes information at 5/D1 the and presents respectively. D3 moment they to c l a r i f y the ,/----) situation. / The PS r u l e c a p a b l e o f g e n e r a t i n g an NP which is /=-A, up o f a noun modified by a demonytrate!pronoun w i l l be: \ k d ' PS r u l e 2 The NP - / made>. 1' i , / -, N(D) o p t i o n a l i t y o f t h e d e t e r m i n e r i s due t o t h e f a c t t h a t a head noun w i t h o u t m o d i f i e r s has t h e p o t e n t i a l i t i e s o f a f u l l NP as i n t h e example below: 15 M-n-dip rn-bo,oi water good + pres.t. "Water i s good" This sentence can be s a i d t o be made up o f an NP and a VP i n w h i c h case t h e NP i s a s i n g l e N . B The I n t e r r o q a t i v e Pronoun The i n t e r r o g a t i v e d e t e r m i n e r i s noun c l a s s dependent Limbum. in There a r e t h e f o l l o w i n g f o r m s f o r t h e i n t e r r o g a t i v e i n t h e language: il - 6i~lnsG-1 I Gloss 1 c&ft/yi-fi 1 Plural 1 mi-ft/vi-fd] which one? - 32 I Gloss which ones? fi where? fi where ? kt what? ki what ? ndaa whom, who, whose? ndaa I I who, whom, whose? The use o f t h e s e i n t e r r o g a t i v e forms i s i l l u s t r a t e d t h e sentences below: 1 6 ( a ) n-dap house c&fi m-n-dap vi-fi? yi-fi houses which which " w h i c h house?" "which houses?" (Amongst many o t h e r s ) (Amongst many) ( b ) m-n-dip water mi-fi? which "Which w a t e r ? " ( c ) n-dap house ndaa? m-n-dap ndaa? who houses who "whose house?" "whose houses?" in - iij ( d ) n-dap house ( c ) n-dap house m-n-dap k i? what houses what "What houses?" fi? m-n-dap fi? where houses where "Which house?" mi-fl - k i? "What house?" I 33 "Which houses?" i s used w i t h nouns o f c l a s s e s D3 (liquids) and we have i n 1 6 ( b ) above. 5/D1 such C&fl or y i - f 6 a r e used when what i s t a l k e d about i s p r e s e n t as rbi "Kolanut" amongst many o t h e r t h i n g s . as i s When t h e o b j e c t i s a b s e n t , fi used as w e have i n 1 6 ( c ) above. yi-fc former and v i - f i a r e r a r e l y used i n t h e language. The i s used m o s t l y by n o n - n a t i v e speakers and t h e l a t t e r e s p e c i a l l y by c h i l d r e n . The P . S . determiner the in r u l e f o r an NP m o d i f i e d by an interrogative Limbum i s . determiner being optional because t h e noun can f u n c t i o n i n d e p e n d e n t l y as a f u l l NP. C The d e f i n i t e Pronoun In L i m b u m , t h e d e f i n i t e pronoun morphemes i n c l u d e : S t i l l 1 - 34 I Limbum - ! I English 1 a1 1 We msi p rn37 ..... k a ? I none (Fig. X I ) M 3 7 means " o t h e r " and ka7 i s a marker o f n e g a t i o n . 18 ( a ) mi k3n mS7 I 7ike other 6 of wowee kS7 them not " I l i k e none o f them" (b) n3 m-ro7 m-ca msip drink wine this all " D r i n k a l l t h i s wine" (c) n5 m-ro7 m-ca we drink wine this all " D r i n k a l l t h i s wine" I t i s w o r t h n o t i n g t h a t t h e d e f i n i t e pronoun i n is noun c l a s s dependent because i t s f o r m i s i n v a r i a b l e not w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e noun i t d e t e r m i n e s . 19 ( a ) Limbum mZ ye birang m s i p/we I eat groundnuts all "I have e a t e n a l l t h e g r o u n d n u t s " (b) al 4 35 - 0 y60 b-baa msip/we they buy bags all "They have bought all the bags" (c) sha bee 0 n3 people s.m. drink we/msip cornbeer all "People have drunk a1 1 the cornbeer" The definite pronoun is always positioned to the right of the noun it determines. The PS rule that can generate the NP consisting of a noun modified by a definite pronoun is: r PS rule 4: NP -> N (D) The determiner i s optional because of the status of N. It (N) can independently function as an NP. D The indefinite Pronoun Like Limbum is the not definite noun pronoun, the indefinite pronoun in class dependent. indefinite pronouns include those in Forms for figure X I 1 below. the - 36 - L imbum English m5 7 some, c e r t a i n 93r many, s e v e r a l , kZ7 . . . + i n t e r r o Pron. much any M37 has many meanings depending on t h e c o n t e x t i n which it is used. I t v a r i o u s l y means " o t h e r " , and "one" (when c o u n t i n g ) . as a numeral e . g . an As "certain" 20 ( a ) one man, we use m 3 7 s i r . indefinite pronoun, m57 . Q - W ~ m3 7 person some bee m3 7 people some "Some peop 1e " (c) "certain" B u t i f "one" i s used w i t h a noun Somebody (b) "some", rl-wi m3 7 a mb6 vi, person some s.m. P2 come certain Somebody came " " A c e r t a i n p e r s o n came" means "some" or - 37 g3r can also serve both indefinite used. In as adjective as and an depending on the context in which it is pronoun The former function will the an be examples, g3r following examined acts as subsequently. an indefinite pronoun. 21 bee 93r 0 mbi, vii people many s.m. P2 come several many people came" several The sentence above i s vague as it can in which also mean "Big people came" case g3r functions as an adjective "big". To avoid this ambiguity, the prefer positioning the item "g3r" sentence-finally as in 2 2 native speaker would below: 22 bee 0 mbi, vir 93r people s.m. P2 come many/several "Many/Several people came" The morpheme kZ3 which is a marker o f negation an indefinite pronoun. with pronoun when attached becomes to an interrogative It does not make sense on its own except when used other morphemes to mean "none" in the case of definite pronouns, and "any" in the case of indefinite pronouns or to express any aspect o f negation. T o mean "any", we have kZ7 I + interro.Pron. Consider the examples below: 2 3 (a) kZ7 ndaa who any " Any body '' (b) kZ7 ki any " (C) " what Any th i ng " kZ? ce-fi any which An y one (d) ka? any 'I mi-fi which "Anyone" (N.Cl .D3) The PS rule that can generate an NP i n which possible the noun is determined by an indeflnlte pronoun is: c? PS rule 5 NP E -> (- N (D) c 1 The definite Article Morphologically, the form of the Limbum is similar to that of definite the near article speaker in (NS) -__ .- demonstrative pronoun. different tones. 39 - They only differ in that The bear demonstrative bears a contour (NS) tone as in ca "this" while they the definite article bears a register tone (L) as we have in 2 4 below: 2 4 (a) rn53 Ca child the e mbii dii s.m. P2 go "The child went" (b) e mbi, dii ni 0-wa7 ca he P2 with book the go "He went with the b o o k " The definite article in Limbum is noun class dependent as illustrated in the examples below: 25 (a) b8o b-Ca vi bebi things the s.m. spoil "The things are spoi It" (b) bebi a YO C& thing the s.m. spoil "The thing is spoilt" (c) m-n-dip m-ca mi kGte water the s.m. spill "The water i s spilt". - 40 - Sometimes, the defin te article is marked as in for the sake o f convenience. example I repeated as ( 2 6 26 not m k yi q-kvli yo 0-ye child of chief is thief "The child o f the chief is a thief" PS The rule f o r an NP in which the head N is modified by the definite article is: The determiner is optional because the noun can act as a full N P with o r without the determiner. F The indefinite Article The indefinite article is not morphologically marked in Limbum. 27 The structures below illustrate this. ( a ) fa give mZ q-g3r3 me mango "Give me a mango" (b) 1st- n-Sara? take needle "Take a needle" \ - 41 ( c ) o-wt person yo mba n-dap i s in house - " A p e r s o n i s i n t h e house" " T h e r e i s someone i n t h e house" The PS possible rule for an NP modified by the i n d e f i n i t e a r t i c l e w i l l be: PS r u l e 7 : NP The -> N d e t e r m l n e r i s n o t j u s t o p t i o n a l h e r e b u t absent because t h e i n d e f l n l t e a r t l c l e i s n o t m o r p h o l o g i c a l l y marked i n the 1anguage . G. C a r d i n a l Numerals As NFORGWEI (1991 p39 ) points c a r d i n a l s a r e commonly used and a r e formed 28 1 m3' 6 ntuunfir 2 baa 7 saamba 3 taar 8 waami 4 kjee 9 tG?ii 5 tzi A f t e r 10, 10 r G t i we have nc6p + s i m p l e numbers. out, on "In Limbum, base 10." - il 29 11 ncop-rn37 12 ncop-baa 13 nc6p-taar 42 - C a r d i n a l n u m e r a l s a r e noun c l a s s dependent i n Limbum as can be seen i n 30 below: 30 ( a ) tob5 finger m37si r m-tob5 m- baa one fingers two "One f i n g e r " ( b ) c5? "Two f i n g e r s " m37sir c l o t h e one "One c l o t h e " (c) m53 child b-cS7 b- bsa clothes two C2/B1 "Two c l o t h e s " m57si r b3s b- baa one children two "One c h i I d " (d) rbi Kolanut C2/D1 A2/B4 "Two c h i l d r e n " rn3'si r m-bi m- bSa one Kolanuts two "One K o l a n u t " 5/D1 "Two K o l a n u t s " When a c a r d i n a l numeral d e t e r m i n e s a noun, p o s i t i o n e d t o t h e r i g h t o f t h e s a i d noun. i t i s always The PS r u l e can g e n e r a t e an NP m o d i f i e d by a c a r d i n a l numeral i s : PS r u l e 8: NP -> N (D) that - 43 - 0 is optional because of N's ability to function as a full NP independently. Ordinal numerals H. Unlike the cardinals, ordinals are less frequently used This may be because they in Limbum. number. are very limited in There are ordinals in Limbum which express "first" (ahead), "next" (behind) and "last". They, unlike the cardinals, are not noun class dependent as can be observed in 31 below. 31 (a) s i 0 bird ent5mbi p-si0 entomb? f i rst/ahead birds first/ahead "First bird" (b) rn-bjr, bush cow "First bi rds" ent6mbi m-m-bsrl entomb? first/ahead bush cows first/ahead - friend p - k6 r next (behind) friends next/behind A2/B5 "Next friends" We can therefore containing &!I&]> ernbgnji " N e x t friend" A2/B3 "Fi rst bush cows "First bush cow" ( c ) n-kar Al/Bl postulate the PS rule for an NP a noun which is determined by an ordinal numeral as: PS rule 9: NP -> N (a) D is optional because o f the potentiality of N which can function independently as a full NP. I The oossessive determiner The possessive determiner in Limbum is noun class This Can be observed on the table below: deDendent. \ i rn I Singular English I ---Plural Engl ish Li mbum my bag wa b-baa my bags your bag wo b-bZa your bags t baa C2/B1 yi baa his bag v i b-baa his bags ySr baa our bag wer b-baa our bags yee baa your bag wee b-baa your bags yap baa their bag wap b-baa their bag m 3 3 wa my child b33 wa my children m 3 3 wo your children m 3 3 yi his children rn33 wer our children n33 wee your children n33 wap their children A2/B4 (Fig. XIII) In most cases, the possessive determiner precedes the N in Limbum but can be seen on in some cases, it comes after the head figure XI11 above. The latter N case as is - . , a nouns reverse the general order o f [Poss. N.]. The d PS rule that can generate this sequence of head noun and the possessive determiner i s : PS rule 10: NP -> N (D) (D) N I n the discussion of the noun and determiners so far, we have postulated the following PS rules:- 1) N + demonstrative Pron. NP -> N (0) 2) N + interro. Pron. NP -> N (0) + definite Pron. NP -> N (D) 3) N 4) N + indefinite Pron. NP -> N (0) (D) N (0) 5) N + definite art. NP -> N 6) N + indefinite art. NP-> N 7) N + Cardinal numerals NP -> N 8) N + Ordinal numerals NP -> N (0) NP -> N (D) 9) N + Poss. Pron. (D) A conflated PS 11: NP -> N rule for the noun and determiners wil be: PS rule (D) N (D) (D) N a - 46 - ADJECTIVES 2.2.2 An adjective is a word which qualifies it is used in an NP. which to the noun determines unlike the the determiner which noun with which it is used, adjectives. noun with It assigns a particular quality definition, adjectives in Limbum attributive the will specifies or From the above include mainly the All other adjectives serve more as determiners than as adjectives. The form of the adjective is determined by the noun class of the qualified noun. A The attributive adjective a quality or qualities to t h e noun with which it is associated as can be This seen type of adjective on the figure below. the noun it modifies. (Fig. XIV) attributes Its form depends on the class of - 47 - The a t t r i b u t i v e a d j e c t i v e i n Limbum always comes after t h e head N . The PS r u l e necessary t o g e n e r a t e t h i s NP t y p e i s : A i s o p t i o n a l because N can f u n c t i o n as a f u l l NP w i t h o u t i t ( i e A). 2.2.3 THE A S S O C I A T I V E NP TAMANJI (1991 p . 7 4 ) says is used to express a s s o c i a t i o n such a s : var e t y of possess on, semantic time of aspects use, of material, o r i g i n , q u a l i t y , q u a n t i t y , f u n c t i o n , p l a c e o f use contents, etc. a "The a s s o c i a t i v e c o n s t r u c t i o n " I n an a s s o c i a t i v e NP i n Limbum, t h e r e a r e two nouns: N1 and N 2 . They a r e l i n k e d by an a s s o c i a t i v e marker (Am) w h i c h i s either a structure. N1. floating The form tone or a segmental house b b-lbr Am stones "House of s t o n e s " of CV o f t h e (Am) depends on t h e c l a s s o f C o n s i d e r t h e examples below: 32 ( a ) n-dap unit n-dap b-lor (b) u-gkp fowl Lo ba Am father 48 n-gkp ba "Fowl of father" "Father's fowl" (c) n-d0u husband " yi makf0 Am grandmother H u sb and o f g randmoth e r " "Grandmother's husband" (e) m-n-dip water '' mi nigk6r Am yesterday Wa te r of yesterday " "Yesterday's water" What we realize from the examples above is that the noun ( N l ) which is modified is always to the extreme left of the phrase. This leads us to the postulation of the PS rule below for the associative NP: PS rule 13: As in NP -> N (Gen.P.) previous PS rules, the rule indicates that the N can function as a full NP without any modification. 2.2.4 THE COMPLEX NP A complex NP is one in which the modifier is an embeded sentence that usually functions as a relative clause. The 0 as we have in the examples below: complementizer a mbii ye s.m. P2 eat ce nf3 33 (a) birar, groundnuts c Nfor "The groundnuts which Nfor ate" (b) in-0-gur oi 1 Ci. C mb6 kGte P2 spill le,/ ~ n a ;?/ "The oil which spilled" c CYh. // O-gkP CG mama am fa mi fowl C mother s m P3 give me ('',',' jna :the / :ij "The fowl which mother gave me" From the exmples above, the PS rule that can generate the comolex NP in Limbum i s PS rule 14: NP -> N' D -> N (C') N' The can C1 alone is optional for the obvious reason function as a full NP. that the N This PS rule indicates that the satellites of a head N may not only be a single modifier but also a phrase. Our foregoing analysis of the modified NP in Limbum implies that there are two levels of categories. - 50 - - Word-level categories e.g. N , P, D etc. A, - Phrase-level categories e.g. NP, VP, Gen.P, CP etc. We established recognizes three in that (1.4.1.1) levels of projection: Maximal projection level, Semi-phrasal word level. the X-bar theory Phrasal level o r level and zero It was also said that the semi-phrasal relates the maximal projection to consideration the X-bar the head. Taking to verify the eve1 into theory and basing our analys s on information got so far from the NP types discussed, we going or existence or semi-phrasal l e v e l category in Limbum. non-existence Let us are of the consider 33 below: 33 0-gljp ce mama mbii Ye na fowl C mother P2 eat the "The fowl which mother ate" The phrase marker f o r example ( 3 3 ) will be (34) below: - 51 - I CS SPEC mama I 1 I fowl "The which fowl V' I mother which P2 mother [n-giip cS mama mbir ye] forms a ' I t eat the ate" constituent which for the sake of convenience now, we call X . [o-giip ce mbii mama ye] and [na] form another constituent X in the phrase marker looks like an which is an NP or N11. it will give us or N11 but if we replace it with an Nl', NP the PS rule below: PS rule 15: NP -> This will make determiner NP the D rule recursive rule is not recursive. whereas X is therfore not an N11 and cannot be an N o r a zero level category it is not a single noun. category between categories. (N'). the According naturally, a either because It is therefore an intermediary phrasal level and the word level to the X-bar theory, it is an N-bar The tree diagram (34) above will thus be 35 below: II - - 52 D na C CG mama V' I mb6 ' V mother which which fowl fowl "The eat P2 mother the ate" This means that in Limbum we have all the three of projectlon that characterize phrasal and levels sententlal structures. The PS rule that can generate this NP type wlll be: PS rule 16: Nll -> N1 D N' -> N C' C' -> c I' 111 -> SPEC I' -> -> I V' I' V l l 1 1 v The determiner in this NP is not optional because N' not a full NP and it independently as a full NP. is not an N is that can function So far, the discussion on the NP in Limbum has led to the postulation of the following PS rules: -> 2) NP 3) NP -> 4) NP -> 5) NIT -> In N (D) (D) N N (A) N (for the N and determiners) (for N and adjectives) (Gen.P) (for the associative NP) N1 order D (for the complex NP) to achieve a significant linguistic generalization, the rules will be collapsed so that we have one generalized rule which will generate an NP out o f either an obligatory pronoun or noun with or without modifying el emen ts . A below: generalized PS rule for the NP in Limbum will be ( 1 7 ) a 1 PS rule 1 7 : The discussion on the noun and its satellites in Limbum has revealed that whenever a noun possessive determiner, the determiner precedes but the case of nouns of class A2/B4 they reverse this order of occurence. by a head N is modified the is peculiar in that With them, it is instead the noun which precedes the determiner. d i.1 The discussion has also shown that mass nouns (class ' D 3 ) have semilar morphological features with nouns of 5/D1. For example in 2.2.1 (A), the forms class of the demonstrative pronouns for the nouns of these clases are the same : 36 (a) rn-n-dip water m-c& this N.Cl. D 3 "This water" (b) m-bi Kol anuts m-ck these "These Kolanuts" N.C1. 5/D1 - P 55 4 - Word o r d e r in the language is not very rigid. NP, the head sometimes a indicative mostly determiner of the occupies the occupies In the leftmost position but this position which is fact that word order in the language is not very strict. Moreover, the pronoun or has revealed that a noun can function as a head in the NP. the t w o serve as modified. discussion unmodified NPs, only the noun only a While can be a m i CHAPTER THREE OTHER PHRASE TYPES INTRODUCTION 3.0 The a i m o f t h i s c h a p t e r phrase types in order i s to to determine o c c u r r e n c e o f t h e NP i n r e l a t i o n t o larger and phrase other the a few other position of constituents in show t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e NP constructions, other examine types, and bring out the relevant s i g n i f i c a n t l i n g u i s t i c g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s t h a t c h a r a c t e r ze t h e v a r i o u s phrase t y p e s . In this wise there w i l l be an e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e i n f l e c t i o n p h r a s e ( P ) , t h e prepos t i o n a l phrase (PP), t h e a d j e c t i v a l p h r a s e CAP (VP) i n t e r m s o f and t h e v e r b phrase t h e i r c o n s t i t u e n t s t r u c t u r e s and t h e 1 in e a r and h i e r a r c h i c a l o r d e r o f t h e c o n s t i t u e n t s . 3.1 THE I N F L E C T I O N PHRASE The I P i s e q u i v a l e n t t o t h e s e n t e n c e ( s ) . by I which always bears tense and It i s headed concord p r o p e r t i e s . T a l k i n g a b o u t t h e I P w i t h r e f e r e n c e t o B a f u t , TAMANJI (1991 p . 9 3 ) has t h i s t o say: IP, I i s expanded by t h e VP i n t o I' " I n the w h i c h i s i n t u r n expanded by a specifier ( u s u a l l y an N P ) i n t o I P . " This also holds f o r Limbum as seen i n t h e f o l l o w i n g true sentences: - 56 - 1 (a) q-wZ person 57 ~ bi VG hjansi Fo come tomorrow "Somebody wi 11 come tomorrow" (b) Sanga Sanga Vk a Pres.P. come "Sanga has come" (c) Saqga bZ dG Sanga PI go "Sanga went" (d) S a q g a Sanga mbir ye baa P2 eat cornfufu i "Sanga ate cornfufu I I In ( d ) sanga is the specifier, mbG i s the I and the VP ( V 1 1 ) while baa i.s an NP (N") direct object. ye expands rnbG into expanded 1" into I1 i s illustrated below: I is I ! 1 functioning as a which by the specifier Sanga. ye is in. turn This projection i . I I I I 1 ! - 58 - SPEC sanga 1 I m bG V / Ye P2 Sanga “Sanga ate \Nil baa eat cornfufu cornfufu“ The PS rule capable of generating the 1P i s : PS rule I: IP -> SPEC 1’ I’ -> I V’ 1 V” -> v N1 ’ Other complex IPS could lead to some changes on this P S rule but we shall maintain the present rule since it serves the purpose o f this study. 3.2 THE PREPOSITIONAL PHRASE The head word In the PP is a expresses preposition which often possession, instrument, direction, accompaniment, location, etc. The following prepositions can be identified in Limbum: ni, mbe, mba, ko, nje. The preposition n i functions as a marker of direction, accompaniment and instrument sentences below: as can be observed in the 3 (a) 59 - e ba fa in-baa ni ye he P1 give money to him "He gave money t o hime" (b) e mb6 cep n-too ni WZ he P2 send message to you "He s e n t a message t o you" (c) e m-nvG ni in-baa he P3 come with money "He came w i t h money" )c -/-. ( d ) / e ' mbi, 2 ' he P2 vi, ni m3 3 Yi come with child his "He came w i t h h i s c h i l d " (cf e mbi, gbar ye ni s a7 he P2 cut him with cutlass "He c u t him w i t h a c u t l a s s " (f) e mbil d6 ni Y i ta he P2 go with his father "He went w i t h h i s f a t h e r " The p r e p o s i t i o n The a is always used t o express location. examples below i l l u s t r a t e t h e use o f mbe as a marker o f 1o c a t ion : 4 (a) e he 60 - mbk n3o mbe koo P2 sleep in bed "He s l e D t i n bed" (b) e yo mbe n-dap he is in house "He i s i n t h e house" (c) e he "He (d) mbk CG mbe n-ta? P2 sit on chair s a t on a c h a i r " le b? mbe n-ji put hand on back " P u t your hand on t h e back" The p r e p o s i t i o n s @& direction and and location. @ function as markers of The o n l y d i f f e r e n c e which e x i s t s between them i s t h a t g e o g r a p h i c a l l y , the former indicates something which i s down w h i l e t h e l a t t e r i n d i c a t e s something which i s up. The sentences below d e m o n s t r a t e t h e use o f t h e two p r e p o s i t i o n s : 5 (a) e he ba dk mba n-dap P1 go to house "He went t o t h e house" ( w h i c h 1s down) (b) e he ba VW k6 n-ndap Pl come to house "He came t o t h e house" ( c ) n-f5 Nfor Nfor (chich i s up) mb6 v6 k6 la7 P2 come at home " N f o r came home" ( d ) n-f5 - 61 (which i s up) mbG v6 mba la7 P2 come at home " N f o r came home" ( w h i c h i s down) The p r e p o s i t i o n n j e i n d i c a t e s d i r e c t i o n , .J I t s use can be seen i n t h e sentences below: Provenance. 6 (a) e he ba vw nje n-dap P1 come to house "He came t o t h e house" (b) tata y6 nje n-wa? Tata is at book "Tata i s a t school" (c) location e ci VG nje dowala ntini he pres. come from Douala today cont. "He i s coming f r o m Douala today" and (d) n-jike Njike - 62 mbit v6 nje Kirmba ninkirr P2 come from Kumba yesterday " N j ike came f r o m Kumba y e s t e r d a y " From t h e above d i s c u s s i o n , t h e f o l l o w i n g PS r u l e can be p o s t u l a t e d f o r t h e g e n e r a t i o n o f t h e PP i n Limbum: PS r u l e 2 : 3.3 PP -> P NP (ADV.P) THE ADJECTIVAL PHRASE This phrase i s c a l l e d an AP because t h e head word i n i t is an a d j e c t i v e . Below a r e examples of phrases a d j e c t i v e s f u n c t i o n as t h e heads o f t h e AP. 7 (a) a Pres.t O-WZ nsi na person black this "This i s a b l a c k man" (b) a Pres.t n-WZ mbviru na person white this " T h i s i s a w h i t e man" ( c ) m53 child mbanrir male "Male c h i I d " in whlch (d) m33 - 63 qki7 child little “A little child” Apparently, the adjectives in the examples no above have complements but if we take into consideration structural symmetry among phrase types, we can assume can That is to say, A can be expanded A-double bar (All). word be from level category into the intermediate semi-phrasal This can in turn be expanded into the phrasal category. maximal A into A-bar ( A 1 ) which can in turn be expanded into expanded the that projection level. or In this wise, we can posit the following PS rule f o r the AP in Limbum. ’ PS rule 3: 3.4 -> A THE VERB PHRASE The in AP VP Limbum verbs. is headed by a verb. are divided into transitive the verbs and intransitive The intransitive verbs do not take NP complements as in the examples below: 8 As in English, (a) ya my ma ci bomi mother Pres. sleep Cont. “My mother is sleeping” .- I, (b) n-gwe $I kwe dog Po die he - has died" " A dog (c) e 64 bi kwe Fo die "He will die" (d) e mb& war he P2 cry "He cried" Taking into consideration the above examples, the PS take NP rule that can generate the VP in Limbum will be: PS rule 4 : The VP transitive complements. 9 (a) manjt3 Manjuh "Manjuh (b) V --i verbs on the other hand The examples in ( 9 ) testify this assertion. a Pres.P. has Ye kw8 eat maize eaten maize" tala? bi 16r m- baa Talah Fo take money "Talah will take money" (c) - 65 Tala7 ba n3 m-n-di p Talah P1 drink water " T a l a h drank w a t e r " The f o l l o w i n g r u l e w i l l g e n e r a t e t h e VP in the above sentences: PS r u l e 5 : Both VP -> V NP transitive and intransitive verbs complements as i n t h e f o l l o w i n g examples.: 10 ( a ) ya my ma C i bomi mbe n-dap mother Pres. sleep in house Cont. "My mother i s s l e e p i n g i n t h e house" (b) a O - W ~ person Pres.P. kwe ko la7 die at home "Someone has d i e d a t home" ( c ) Yo your ma ci b ii ko la? mother Pres. dance at home cont. "Your mother i s d a n c i n g a t home" take PP (d) 66 - YO ma bi fa m-baa ni ye your mother Fo give money to him "Your mother w i l l g i v e money t o him'' The PS r u l e t h a t can t a k e c a r e o f such a VP as shown i n t h e sentences above i s : PS r u l e 6 : The -> VP V ( N P ) PP transitive verb takes t h e NP and PP complements w h i l e t h e i n t r a n s i t i v e v e r b t a k e s o n l y t h e PP complement as seen i n ( 1 0 ) above. The verb complement. can mother take an embeded The embeded sentence i s t h e complementizer 1 1 ( a ) mama also G. always sentence introduced rin n5 ndi bi VG know c Ndi Fo come Ngala B Pres.P. l a n5 e bi vG say c he Fo come " N g a l a has s a i d t h a t he w i l l come" ( c ) n-ga1a Ngala a Pres.P. by T h i s i s shown i n t h e examples below: "Mother knows t h a t Ndi w i l l come" ( b ) r]-gBl& as a VG n5 ye fa ye m-baa come c you give him money " N g a l a has come so t h a t you ( P I ) g i v e h i m money" - 67 The PS r u l e t h a t can - generate a VP from the above examDles i s : PS r u l e 7 : The VP VP r a i s e t h e V1 1 2 ( a ) m-bjn Mbong -> V C’ c o n t a i n s a s p e c t u a l markers such as -cf into Vll. F o r example: mblj c 3 7 c i P2 which remove + ASP n-ja nje ki0 meat from pot “Mbong removed meat ( s l i c e a f t e r s l i c e ) f r o m t h e p o t ” (b) e he mbtj kwebcf P2 p i c k + ASP b-ce? clothes “He p i c k e d c l o t h e s (one a f t e r t h e o t h e r ) ” T h l s l a s t example can be r e p r e s e n t e d on a t r e e as 13 below: ASP C i kwebci b-ce’ pick+ASP clothes I ‘:He p i c k e d c l o t h e s ( o n e a f t e r t h e o t h e r ) ” diagram so far, 68 1 - t h e f o l l o w i n g PS r u l e s have been posited for t h e Vp i n Limbum. VP -> v -> -> V -> v V NP (NP) PP C’ A g e n e r a l i z e d PS r u l e f o r t h e V P i n Limoum w i l l PS r u l e 8 : VP be: -> i n t h i s c h a p t e r , i t can be r e a l i z e d t h a t t h e s u b j e c t NP precedes any o t h e r phrase t y p e w i t h which i t o c c u r s in the same c o n s t r u c t i o n ( c l a u s e o r s e n t e n c e ) i n Limbum. I n addition, PP, AP, left VP and I P , one n o t i c e s t h a t , u n l i k e i n t h e NP, i n the t h e head word c o n s i s t e n t l y appears t o t h e In o f i t s complements. t h e NP ( c f c h . 2 ) t h e head word o f t e n preceds i t s s a t e l l i t e s b u t sometimes i t f o l l o w s Limbum is therefore not them. a Head F i r s t Language p e r se and word o r a e r i s n o t v e r y r i g i d i n t h e language. T h i s c h a p t e r has a l s o revealed a general which c h a r a c t e r i z e s phrase t y p e s i n Limbum. phenomenon T h i s phemonenon i s t h a t p h r a s e t y p e s have t h r e e l e v e l s of the bar) intermediate o r (zero) semi-phrasal level. word-level, the (single projection l e v e l , and t h e ( d o u b l c - b a r ) maximal o r viz: phrasal CHAPTER FOUR CONCLUSION 4.0 SUK:;VA:;IY OF WORK Tk,emain purpose of this study has been to describe the NP in Limbum within the generative approach. attain To the I envisaged goal, general information on Limbum was given in chapter one. There was the presentation of the geographical, historical and socio-economic situation o f the people after which the classification o f the language was discussed examined. the and its sociolinguistic stituatio There was also a review of lite a a t briefly e d to The goa'!s and scope o f language ana theoretical frame. the project were stated and its outline given. in chapter two, attention was focussed on the constituents and their linear and hierarchical order. it was pointed out that an pronoun) that only pronoun. with the or NP without head is a head satellites. noun could be Here, (noun or word It was also stated modified After the analysis of the NP, its NP, unlike the it was realized that ,.-A word order is not very .*.striWin .,* the Limbum NP because edes its satellites and at other sometimes the head noun times it is preceded by the satillites. In chapter three, there phrase types and revealed that the phrase with a was comparison Subject NP a brief between always look them precedes at other and the any other it occurs in a larger construction. which - 69 - NP As concerns o t h e r A-pOSitiOnS realized that NP the i n other occurs phrase i n which i t i s f o u n d . language has semi-phrasal three phrase only it types, was a f t e r t h e head o f t h e I t was a l s o r e a l i z e d t h a t levels o f projection viz: the word l e v e l , l e v e l and p h r a s a l l e v e l . LIMITATIONS 4.1 One cannot c l a i m t o have e x h a u s t i v e l y t r e a t e d t h e NP i n Limbum because i n t h e c o u r s e o f i t s a n a l y s i s , problems t o which adequate s o l u t i o n s others might not have which m i g h t have escaped n o t i c e a r o s e . satellites of the A and we had to symmetry t o assume t h a t t h e r e c o u l d be could i n t o A” might expand A i n t o A’ have and One o f t h e s e any r e l y on c a t e g o r i a l another and t h a t A’ by a n o t h e r c o n s t i t u e n t . not found I t was n o t p o s s i b l e t o f i n d problems concerns t h e A . P . that been constituent c o u l d be expanded Since t h e data available been s u f f i c i e n t t o e s t a b l i s h whether t h e A has m o r p h o l o g i c a l l y marked s a t e l l i t e s o r n o t i n Limbum, it i s f e l t t h a t t h i s c o u l d s e r v e as an a r e a o f f u t u r e r e s e a r c h . Another problem concerns t h e noun and differentiate adjectives. which surfaced ts satellites. during I t was The ord nal the numerals not dependent. The p r o b l e m t h e n was whether t h e the easy to numerals noun are class noun former class should as a d e t e r m i n e r and the. l a t t e r as an a d j e c t i v e , o r t h e two be t r e a t e d solve cardinal are while treated not between some m o d i f i e r s namely d e t e r m i n e r s and dependent be the analysis problem, as determiners or adjectives. TO i t was t e n t a t i v e l y d e c i d e d t h a t t h e y be - 71 - treated as determiners taking into that fact the them could behave as an adjective per se. A of none consideration more detailed research on numerals could reveal whether they are determiners or adjectives, or one is a determiner and the other an adjective. These major problems and some minor ones which might have escaped notice came up during the analysis o f the NP in Lirnbum. Such problem areas could then as serve areas of future research. 4.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF PROJECT In spite of the above problems for solutions could not be found, it i s hoped will , contribute to the more importantly, to the this study progress of Mother Tongue / (MT) dissertation may also be o f inte rest to students of linguistics particular in general, and because it national and potential hopefully syntactic studies in Limburn. to that growth of Limburn linguistics, and edcation i n Cameroon. This which tenable lays syntacticians a foundation in for It could also be of importance international linguistic bodies which are interested in the study of African languages. - 72 - BIBLIOGRAPHY CHOMSKY, (19651, AsDects N. O f t h e Theory O f Syntax. MIT: Cambridge. DIEU, P. and RENAUD, M. ( e d s ) ( 1 9 8 3 ) A t l a s L i n n u i s t i a u e du Cameroun. GREENBERG, J.H. (1955), Studies i n A f r i c a n L i n q u i s t i c Classification. Have: Compass P u b l i s h i n g Press. R. HEDINGER, ( 1 9 7 7 ) , The Noun C l a s s e s o f Ak6ose. Cameroon S.I.L. HIGGENS and BRADLEY ( 1 9 8 5 ) , Limbum Lansuaqe L e a r n i n q Course. Cameroon S . I . L . HYMAN, L.M. (1980), Noun C l a s s e s i n t h e G r a s s f i e l d s Bantu Borderland. SCOPIL 8. Loss A n g e l i s . U n i v e r s i t y o f Southern C a l i f o r n i a . MBURti and BOMNSA ( 1 9 8 1 ) , An I n t r o d u c t i o n to Limbum. Major Seminary, Bambui Cameroon. MFONYAM, J.N. (1988), __ Bafut for - MISODI, P. J . Tone I n OrthoRraDhY: t h e Case o f and R e l a t e d Lanquaqes. "Doctsrat d ' E t a t " , (1991), Dissertation U n i v e r s i t y o f Yaounde. The Verb i n M0kDwe:A Moroho-Syntactic Study. Dissertation for post-graduate diploma i n L i n g u i s t i c s . U n i v e r s i t y o f Yaounde. , T.S. NFORGWE 13 1 - Towards a Pedagoqical Grammar o f (1991). Limbum. Dissertation f o r "Maitrise p r o f e s s i o n n e l l e " U n i v e r s i t y o f Yaounde. ORE, Y . S Y N T A C T I C ANALYSIS. (1992), University O f I l o r i n , Nigeria. PECK, P.M. (1374). An A n n o t a t e d B i b l i o s r a o h v o f Limbum I N s u n a l i ) and N e i g h b o u r i n n Lanquaaes. Yaounde S . I . L . PECk and N D I ( 1 9 7 9 ) , PIETER, (19861, V.R. Read and w r i t e Limbum. m c t v a a r i a t i e l n h e t Limbum, een B a n t o e t a a l v i t Kameroen. PRYSE, B.E. (1984), Yaounde S.I.L.. Yaounde S . I . L . E n g l i s h - W i t h o u t Tears. Williams C o l l i n s Sons, L t d . Glasgow. QUIRK, R. et al. (1972), A Grammar o f CamtemDorary E n q l i s h . Longman. Q U I R K and SIDNEY ( 1 9 7 3 ) , A U n i v e r s i t y Grammar o f E n g l i s h . .Longman. RADFORD, A. (1981), T r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l Svntax. Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s . Cambridge, TADADJEU and SADEMBOUO ( 1 9 8 4 ) , General A l p h a b e t o f Cameroon Languages. Yaounde. TAMANJI, P.N. PROPELCA N o . 1 University of - ( 1 9 9 1 ) , The B a f u t Noun Phrase. Dissertation f o r " D o c t o r a t de 3e C y c l e " U n i v e r s i t y o f Yaounde. . -- VOORHOEVE, J . (1977), 74 - "Limburn" i n HYMAN and VOORHOEVE, e d s L'EXPANSION BANTOUE: LeS C l a s s e s N o r m i n a l e s dans le B a n t o u d e s G r a s s f i e l d s . wELMERS, E. ( 1 9 7 3 ) , A f r i c a n Languaqe S t r u c t u r e s . University o f C a l i f o r n i a Press. de WOLF, P. (1971), The Noun C l a s s S y s t e m o f Proto-Benue-Conqo. T h e Hague, Mouton.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz