Version 1.0 General Certificate of Education (A-level) January 2012 Mathematics MPC3 (Specification 6360) Pure Core 3 Final Mark Scheme Mark schemes are prepared by the Principal Examiner and considered, together with the relevant questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at the standardisation events which all examiners participate in and is the scheme which was used by them in this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark scheme covers the students’ responses to questions and that every examiner understands and applies it in the same correct way. As preparation for standardisation each examiner analyses a number of students’ scripts: alternative answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated for. If, after the standardisation process, examiners encounter unusual answers which have not been raised they are required to refer these to the Principal Examiner. It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed and expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular examination paper. Further copies of this Mark Scheme are available from: aqa.org.uk Copyright © 2012 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. Copyright AQA retains the copyright on all its publications. However, registered schools/colleges for AQA are permitted to copy material from this booklet for their own internal use, with the following important exception: AQA cannot give permission to schools/colleges to photocopy any material that is acknowledged to a third party even for internal use within the centre. Set and published by the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance. The Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA) is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales (company number 3644723) and a registered charity (registered charity number 1073334). Registered address: AQA, Devas Street, Manchester M15 6EX. Key to mark scheme abbreviations M m or dM A B E or ft or F CAO CSO AWFW AWRT ACF AG SC OE A2,1 –x EE NMS PI SCA c sf dp mark is for method mark is dependent on one or more M marks and is for method mark is dependent on M or m marks and is for accuracy mark is independent of M or m marks and is for method and accuracy mark is for explanation follow through from previous incorrect result correct answer only correct solution only anything which falls within anything which rounds to any correct form answer given special case or equivalent 2 or 1 (or 0) accuracy marks deduct x marks for each error no method shown possibly implied substantially correct approach candidate significant figure(s) decimal place(s) No Method Shown Where the question specifically requires a particular method to be used, we must usually see evidence of use of this method for any marks to be awarded. Where the answer can be reasonably obtained without showing working and it is very unlikely that the correct answer can be obtained by using an incorrect method, we must award full marks. However, the obvious penalty to candidates showing no working is that incorrect answers, however close, earn no marks. Where a question asks the candidate to state or write down a result, no method need be shown for full marks. Where the permitted calculator has functions which reasonably allow the solution of the question directly, the correct answer without working earns full marks, unless it is given to less than the degree of accuracy accepted in the mark scheme, when it gains no marks. Otherwise we require evidence of a correct method for any marks to be awarded. MPC3 Q Solution x 0 1(a) y 1 1 2 1 1 12 2 2 12 3 Marks 4 all 7 x values correct (and no extra) (PI by 7 correct y values) B1 5 or more correct y values, exact 12 1 4 , 4 ... or evaluated (in table or in formula) 16 32 64 f (x) = 4 x + 2 x – 8 or ] correct substitution of their 7 y-values into Simpson’s rule M1 A1 4 CAO g (x) = 8 – 2x – 4x change of sign ∴ 1.2 < α < 1.3 (f(x) must be defined and all working correct) ( ( B1 8 = f ( 1.2 ) –= 0.3 or g ( 1.2 ) 0.3 = f ( 1.3 ) 0.7 = or g ( 1.3 ) – 0.7 AWRT ±0.3 and ± 0.7 condone f (1.2) < 0 , f (1.3) > 0 if f is defined (ii) Comments 2 A = 1 × 1 [ 65 + 4 × 42 + 2 × 20 3 2 = 91 or 45.5 or 273 2 6 (b)(i) Total x2 = ) 1.243 M1 attempt at evaluating f(1.2) and f(1.3) alternative method 1.2 4= 5.3, 8 − 2 × 1.2 = 5.6 1.3 4= 6.1, 8 − 2 × 1.3 = 5.4 A1 2 at 1.2 LHS < RHS at 1.3 LHS > RHS ∴ 1.2 < α < 1.3 B1 x3 = )1.232 B1 Total M1 2 8 these values only A1 MPC3 (cont) Q 2(a) (b)(i) Solution (c)(i) (ii) Total Comments f (1) = 21 f (16) = 1 M1 1 ≤ f ( x) ≤ 21 A1 63 4x – 1 x = 63 4y –1 x (4 y – 1) = 63 or better M1 reverse x, y M1 one correct step sight of 1 and 21 2 allow f(x) replaced by f, y y= –1 f= ( x ) 1 63 + 1 4 x (ii) Marks Either order OE 1 63 + 1 = 1 4 x 63 + 1 =4, or better x ( x =) 21 ( fg (x) = ) A1 3 condone y = A1 2 one correct step from their (b)(i) = 1, or x = f(1) note: 21 scores 2/2 B1 1 M1 63 4x2 – 1 63 = 1 4 x2 – 1 4 x 2 – 1 = 63 or better M1 A1 A1 x = 16 OE x = − 4 ONLY 2 Total one correct step from their (c)(i) = 1 eg (2x + 8) (2x – 8) = 0, or x = ± 4 3 11 MPC3 (cont) Q 3(a) (b) Solution dy = 12 x 2 – 6 dx Marks Total B1 1 Comments do not ISW 3 2 x 2 – 1 dx ∫2 4 x3 – 6 x + 1 ( (3) ) = 1 ln 4 x3 – 6 x + 1 6 (2) ( ( k ln 4 x 3 – 6 x + 1 , k is a constant A1 k=1 6 m1 correct substitution in F(3) – F(2). condone poor use or lack of brackets. A1F k ln 91 – k ln 21 only follow through on their k ) = 1 ln 4 × 33 – 6 × 3 + 1 6 − 1 ln 4 × 23 – 6 × 2 + 1 6 = 1 ln 91 – 1 ln 21 6 6 1 91 1 13 = = ln or ln 6 21 6 3 ( ) ) M1 A1 5 or if using the substitution u = 4 x3 − 6 x + 1 du M1 ∫=k ∫ u A1 = 1 ln u 6 then, either change limits to 21 and 91 m1 then A1F A1as scheme or changing back to ‘x’, then m1 A1F A1 as scheme Total 4(a) 6 sec 2 θ − 1 = ... B1 sec 2 θ + 3secθ – 10 (= 0) M1 0 ( secθ + 5)( secθ – 2 ) = m1 secθ = – 5, 2 A1 correct use of sec 2 θ = 1 + tan 2θ quadratic expression in sec θ with all terms on one side attempt at factors of their quadratic, ( secθ ± 5)( secθ ± 2 ) , or correct use of quadratic formula 1 1 cos θ = – , 5 2 60° , 300° ,101.5° , 258.5° (b) (AWRT) B1 B1 4 x – 10° = 60° , 101 ⋅ 5° , 258 ⋅ 5° ,300° M1 4 x = 70° , 111 ⋅ 5° , 268 ⋅ 5° ,310° A1F x =⋅ 17 5° , 27 ⋅ 9° ,67.1° ,77 ⋅ 5° (AWRT) Total A1 6 3 correct, ignore answers outside interval all correct, no extras in interval 3 4 x – 10 = any of their (60), all their answers from (a), BUT must have scored B1 CAO, ignore answers outside interval 9 MPC3 (cont) Q Solution 5(a) stretch SF 4 in y-direction Marks Total Comments I II III M1A1 I + (II or III) either order translate E1 e 0 B1 4 accept ‘e in positive x-direction’ (b) e (c)(i) 4ln ( x – e A1 curve touches x-axis at 1 + e (or 3.7 or better), and labelled (ignore scale) 3 correct curvature, including at their 1+ e, approx. asymptote at x = e =4 = 4ln ( x – e ) 4= 4ln ( x – e ) – 4 or better (x =) 2e mod graph, in 2 connected sections, both in the first quadrant, touching x-axis A1 1+e ) M1 do not ISW ( x= ) e + e−1 or ( x = ) e + 1e do not ISW M1 must see 2 equations, condone omission of brackets A1 accept values of AWRT 5.42, 5.43, 5.44 A1 3 accept values of AWRT 3.08, 3.09 if M0 then x = 2e with or without working scores SC1 (ii) x ≥ 2e e<x≤e+ B1 1 e B2 accept values of AWRT 5.42, 5.43, 5.44 3 accept values of AWRT 2.72, 3.08, 3.09 if B2 not earned, then SC1for any of 1 1 1 e ≤ x ≤ e+ , e < x < e+ , e ≤ x < e+ e e e Total 13 MPC3 (cont) Q Marks Solution 6(a) Total dx = ( sin θ × 0 ) – 1 × cos θ sin 2 θ dθ Comments ± sin θ × k ± 1 × cos θ sin 2 θ where k = 0 or 1 quotient rule M1 must see the ‘0’ either in the quotient or in A1 = (b) – cos θ sin 2 θ or = − eg cos θ sin θ sin θ du = 0 etc dθ or equivalent CSO, AG must see one of the previous expressions = – cosecθ cot θ A1 x = cosecθ dx = – cosec θ cot θ dθ Replacing B1 OE, eg dx = – cosecθ cot θ dθ B1 at any stage of solution M1 all in terms of θ , and including their attempt at dx, but condone omission of dθ A1 fully correct and must include dθ (at some stage in solution) A1 OE eg ∫ − sin θ ( dθ ) ( cosec θ – 1) by cot 2 θ , or better 2 ∫=∫ – cosecθ cot θ cosec 2θ ( cosec 2θ – 1 ) dθ –cosecθ cot θ ( dθ ) cosec 2θ cot θ –1 =∫ ( dθ ) cosecθ = cos θ x 2,= θ 0.524 AWRT = 3 ∫ x = A1 B1 2, θ 0.785 AWRT = correct change of limits 1 or ( ± ) cos θ = ( ± ) 1 – 2 x 0.8660 – 0.7071 c's F ( 0.52 ) – F ( 0.79 ) substitution into ± cos θ only m1 3 1 or – 2 2 = 0.159 A1 Total 9 12 2 OE 2 MPC3 (cont) Q Solution dy = 7(a) dx – p e – ⇒ e e 1x 4 1x 4 x 2 + qxe Marks – 1x 4 A1 Comments p, q constants 1 p = – and q = 2 4 – 1 x2 + 2 x = 0 4 – 1x – 1x 4 ≠0 − 14 x 2 0 e ax + bx = x = 0, 8 ( (b)(i) Total M1 ) E1 or e 4 = 0 impossible OE (may be seen later) m1 or e = x 0,= y 0 A1 A1 = x 8,= y 64e –2 B1 2 ∫x e – 1x 4 − 1x 4 x ( ax + b ) = 0 – 8 dv e – 14 x 2 dx = u x= dx – 1x du 2= = x v ke 4 dx 7 M1 condone y = 82 e 4 etc ignore further numerical evaluation where k is a constant A1 k= – 4 1 2 – 4x − ∫ −4e – 4x e – 1x 4 × 2 x(dx), or better A1F correct substitution of their terms m1 both differentiation and integration must be correct – 1x dv ne 4 = u mx = dx – 1x du = m= v – 4ne 4 dx 1 2 – 4x ∫ =– 4 x e – = – 4 x2e 1x 4 – + 8 – 4 xe – 32 xe – 1x 4 1x 4 + ∫ 4e – 128e – 1x 4 – 1x 4 dx (4) (0) Al m1 = –e –1 [ 64 + 256 ] – [ –128 ] = 128 – 320 e (4) (ii) v=π 1 2 – 4x ∫ 9x e (0) correct substitution and attempt at (dep on M1 only) A1 ( dx ) – 1x subtraction in ax 2 e 4 + bxe (may be in 3 stages) 7 M1 = 9π 128 – 320 e A1F Total TOTAL – 1x 4 + ce or 128 − 320e −1 ignore further numerical evaluation condone omission of brackets, limits 2 16 75 9π × (their exact b(i)) – 1x 4
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz