GLOBALISATION, INEQUALITY AND THE RISE OF POPULISM BRIAN NOLAN SSISI, 20 April 2017 Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Globalisation, Inequality and Populism “Rising income inequality is the defining challenge of our times” (President Obama, USA) • Seen as driven by globalisation • And driving rise of populism: “… rising economic insecurity and social deprivation among the left-behinds has fueled popular resentment of the political classes. … made the less secure strata of society – low-waged unskilled workers, the long-term unemployed, households dependent on shrinking social benefits, residents of public housing, single-parent families, and poorer white populations living in inner-city areas with concentrations of immigrants-susceptible to the anti-establishment, nativist, and xenophobic scare-mongering exploited by populist movements, parties, and leaders, blaming ‘Them’ for stripping prosperity, job opportunities, and public services from ‘Us’ (Inglehart and Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Norris, 2016) Outline • What has happened to income inequality across the rich countries? • Has rising income inequality been driven by globalisation? • Is this responsible for ‘revolt of the angry’/rise of populism, directly or indirectly? Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality in Rich Countries Change in Gini Coefficient, 1980-2007 Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality in Rich Countries Change in Gini Coefficient, 2007-13 Fall No change Rise Belgium Finland Iceland Latvia Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania UK Australia Austria Canada Czech Rep France Germany Ireland Luxembourg Norway Switzerland Denmark Estonia Greece Hungary Italy Lithuania Slovak Rep Slovenia Spain Sweden USA Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Income Inequality: Top 1% Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality Trends Striking variation across rich countries: • In extent and pacing of inequality increase • In patterns of increase in inequality • In market income inequality and role of redistribution • In impact of Crisis Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality Drivers • Increasing inequality in market income key – Increased dispersion in individual earnings, returns to ‘skills’, hollowing-out of occupations • Globalisation and technology together key drivers but very hard to disentangle, no consensus on their relative importance – Both required for e.g. global supply chains – Inequality rose in USA and UK well before China ‘shock’ • Underpinned by declining union power and labour market deregulation, minimum wage compression • Some role for income from self-employment and from capital, changing age and household structures • Reduced redistributive capacity/effortCentral Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality Drivers Distinctive factors at top: • CEO pay, change in remuneration systems (and norms?) • Financial sector size and rewards/financialisation • Greater returns to ‘superstars’ in global markets • USA: – 20% of increase in top 1% share reflects shift from labour to capital income, – 20% reflects capital income more concentrated at top, – 60% reflects labour income more concentrated at top • Related to greater mobility in capital and labour, but not simply a reflection of globalisation Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Real Incomes in the Crisis Change in mean income, 2008-2013 (Annual average) Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Recent Income Growth USA Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality and Living Standards Countries have displayed very different trajectories: • Sharply rising inequality and long-term stagnation in median incomes – USA • Long-term stagnation in incomes, little increase in inequality – Japan, Italy • Some growth in incomes, stable inequality – France • Some periods of rising inequality and income growth, some flat inequality and income stagnation – UK • Substantial growth and stable inequality up to Crisis, collapse in income and rising inequality - Greece, Spain • Substantial growth and stable inequality up to Crisis, collapse in income with stable inequality – Ireland • Strong income growth including through Crisis, increase in inequality - Poland Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED What Is Populism? • Current usage can encompass “militarists, pacifists, admirers of Che Guevara or Ayn Rand; treehugging pipeline opponents or drill-baby-drill climate-change deniers” (Economist, 2016) • Populist philosophy is a loose set of ideas that share three core features: anti-establishment, authoritarianism, and nativism (Cas Mudde) • Sees common people as exploited by a privileged elite, and seeks to resolve this – ’pure people’ vs ’corrupt elite’; contrast with pluralism • Perhaps charismatic leader appealing to masses and sweeping aside institutions, but no set ideology. • Hard to operationalise empirically! Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality and Populism • Inglehart and Norris (2016): use 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey to identify ideological location of political parties in 31 European countries • Vote for populist parties across many countries has roughly doubled in recent decades • Pooled European Social Survey data 2002-2014 used to examine who votes for populist parties • Socio-economic variables have some explanatory power but much less than cultural attitudes • Economic insecurity explains less of rise in support for populist parties in Europe than cultural backlash – “retro reaction by once-predominant sectors to progressive value change” Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED • French and German regions that have been more exposed to trade with low-wage countries have seen larger increases in vote shares for extreme-right parties (Malgouyres, 2014; Dippel, Gold, and Heblich, 2015) Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality and Populism • Rise in populist parties in countries with varying experiences in terms of inequality and prosperity – – – – – Poland: strong income growth, increase in inequality France: some income growth, stable inequality Germany: little income growth, some increase in inequality Austria: some income growth, little increase in inequality Spain, Greece, (Ireland?): strong income growth and stable inequality up to Crisis, income collapse in Crisis Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality and Politics • Decline in trust not robustly related to inequality • ‘Discontent’ with inequality rises as inequality rises, but only moderately – extent of increasing inequality not fully recognised – some increase in acceptability of higher inequality – ‘salience’ of inequality varies • Higher inequality associated with lower civic participation, lower voting turnout among poor • Increasing income/wealth concentration => greater political influence for rich? – Evidence for USA, but system distinctive Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality and Brexit Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality and Brexit • Income inequality little altered in last 15-20 years, but a longer-term divide helped to drive Brexit vote • Mood affected by generalised slowdown in income growth since early 2000’s, Crisis, and post-crisis squeeze • Exacerbated for many by rising housing costs • Growing divide between living standard of generations • Coincidence of higher migration in period of disappointing income performance from 2004 • Localities more exposed to trade with China voted more strongly in favor of leaving EU • Education biggest single predictor of the vote, straddles economics, demographics and culture Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality and Trump • White-majority working-class population whose livelihoods had been negatively affected through decades in which US economy shed manufacturing • But cultural and demographic change would have created some degree of populism – places where white identity mixes with longsimmering economic dysfunctions • “It’s a nonurban, blue-collar and now apparently quite angry population. They’re not people who have moved around a lot, and things have been changing away from them, but they live in areas that feel stagnant in a lot of ways” (Frey, Brookings) Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Inequality and Trump • Autor, Doorn, Hansen and Majesi (2016): congressional districts exposed to ‘China shock’ import penetration disproportionately removed moderate representatives from office in 2000s and replaced by more extreme candidates, especially Republicans • Adverse economic conditions drive support for nativist politicians; opportunistic politicians employ strategic extremism to spur participation among core supporters trade shocks raise both voter turnout and individuallevel campaign contributions • Clinton would have won Michigan and Wisconsin if trade shock from Chinese imports had been 25% smaller, Pennsylvania and election if 50% smaller Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED Conclusions, Implications • Emerging ‘grand narrative’ that sustained rise in income inequality is driving ’revolt against elites’ comes closer to reflecting US experience than many other rich countries – though not whole story even there • Need to learn from range of country experiences about complex interactions between these processes, in different institutional and cultural settings Central Bank of Ireland - UNRESTRICTED
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz