doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.5061 available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on J. Mol. Biol. (2001) 314, 279±291 High Resolution Crystal Structures of the Catalytic Domain of Human Phenylalanine Hydroxylase in its Catalytically Active Fe(II) Form and Binary Complex with Tetrahydrobiopterin Ole Andreas Andersen1, Torgeir Flatmark2 and Edward Hough1* 1 Department of Chemistry University of Tromsù N-9037 Tromsù, Norway 2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology University of Bergen AÊrstadveien 19, N-5009 Bergen Norway The crystal structures of the catalytic domain (N1-102/C428-452) of human phenylalanine hydroxylase (hPheOH) in its catalytically competent Fe(II) form and binary complex with the reduced pterin cofactor 6(R)-L-erythro-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) have been determined to Ê , respectively. When compared with the structures reported 1.7 and 1.5 A for various catalytically inactive Fe(III) forms, several important differences have been observed, notably at the active site. Thus, the nonliganded hPheOH-Fe(II) structure revealed well de®ned electron density for only one of the three water molecules reported to be coordinated to the iron in the high-spin Fe(III) form, as well as poor electron density for parts of the coordinating side-chain of Glu330. The reduced cofactor (BH4), which adopts the expected half-semi chair conformation, is bound in the second coordination sphere of the catalytic iron with a C4a-iron Ê . BH4 binds at the same site as L-erythro-7,8-dihydrobiopdistance of 5.9 A terin (BH2) in the binary hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2 complex forming an aromatic p-stacking interaction with Phe254 and a network of hydrogen bonds. However, compared to that structure the pterin ring is displaced Ê and rotated about 10 , and the torsion angle between the about 0.5 A hydroxyl groups of the cofactor in the dihydroxypropyl side-chain has Ê) changed by 120 enabling O20 to make a strong hydrogen bond (2.4 A with the side-chain oxygen of Ser251. Carbon atoms in the dihydroxypropyl side-chain make several hydrophobic contacts with the protein. The iron is six-coordinated in the binary complex, but the overall coordination geometry is slightly different from that of the Fe(III) form. Most important was the ®nding that the binding of BH4 causes the Glu330 ligand to change its coordination to the iron when comparing with nonliganded hPheOH-Fe(III) and the binary hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2 complex. # 2001 Academic Press *Corresponding author Keywords: phenylalanine hydroxylase; tetrahydrobiopterin; ferrous iron; iron ligands; protein crystallography Introduction Abbreviations used: BH2, L-erythro-7,8dihydrobiopterin; BH4, 6(R)-L-erythro-5,6,7,8tetrahydrobiopterin; DTN, dithionite; DTT, dithiothreitol; hPheOH, human phenylalanine hydroxylase; L-Phe, L-phenylalanine; PheOH, phenylalanine hydroxylase; P-rPheOH, phosphorylated rat phenylalanine hydroxylase; PKU, phenylketonuria; qBH2, quinonid dihydropterin; rPheOH, rat phenylalanine hydroxylase; rTyrOH, rat tyrosine hydroxylase; TyrOH, tyrosine hydroxylase; wt, wildtype. E-mail address of the corresponding author: [email protected] 0022-2836/01/020279±13 $35.00/0 The non-heme iron enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase (PheOH, phenylalanine 4-monooxygenase, EC. 1.14.16.1) catalyses the hydroxylation of the essential aromatic amino acid L-phenylalanine (L-Phe) to L-tyrosine, which is the rate-limiting step in the complete catabolism of L-Phe.1 The enzyme belongs to the family of aromatic amino acid hydroxylases with three structurally and functionally closely related enzymes that require the cofactor 6(R)-L-erythro-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) (Figure 1) and dioxygen.3 In the catalytic # 2001 Academic Press 280 Figure 1. Structure of natural tetrahydrobiopterin 6(R)-(6-L-erythro-5,6,7,8-10 ,20 -dihydroxypropyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin showing the non-planarity of the pyrazine ring. Hydrogen atoms are shown as white spheres. The Figure was prepared using MOLSCRIPT.2 reaction the cofactor is oxidized to pterin 4a-hydroxytetrahydrobiopterin. In vivo the latter is then converted to a quinonoid dihydropterin (qBH2) by pterin 4a-carbinolamine dehydratase4 from which BH4 is regenerated by a NAD(P)H-dependent dihydropteridine reductase5; quinonoid dihydropterin can alternatively form L-erythro-7,8-dihydrobiopterin (BH2) by isomerization. PheOH is a cytosolic enzyme mainly located in the liver (hepatocytes) which plays an important role in mammalian metabolism by initiating detoxi®cation of high levels of L-Phe. A de®ciency in human phenylalanine hydroxylase (hPheOH) is linked to the autosomal recessive disease phenylketonuria (PKU)6, and today more than 400 mutations are known at the hPheOH locus7 (http:// www.mcgill.ca/pahdb). Although BH4 is the physiological electron donor in the hydroxylation reaction it is also a potent negative effector of the activation of the enzyme by L-Phe as well as of the phosphorylation of Ser16 by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase.8,9 The oxidized cofactor (BH2) also inhibits the activation by L-Phe, but at higher concentrations than BH4. The dihydroxypropyl side-chain of BH4/BH2 has been found to be essential for this inhibitory effect.10 ± 12 Substantial progress in elucidating the structure and function of the mammalian aromatic amino acid hydroxylases3 has been made in the past decade. Crystallographic studies of PheOH and tyrosine hydroxylase (TyrOH) have revealed that they have a common tetrameric architecture and that each of the chains fold into three domains, i.e. a regulatory, catalytic and tetramerization domain. Crystal structures have been determined for dimeric hPheOH catalyÊ resolution13 (PDB 1PAH), tetratic domain at 2.0 A meric hPheOH catalytic plus tetramerization Ê resolution14 (PDB 2PAH), domains at 3.1 A X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase hPheOH catalytic domain with bound catechol Ê resolution15 (PDB 3PAH, inhibitors at 2.0-2.15 A 4PAH, 5PAH and 6PAH), hPheOH catalytic Ê resolution10 domain in complex with BH2 at 2.0 A (PDB 1DMW) as well as dimeric rat PheOH regulatory plus catalytic domains in phosphorylated (PÊ resolution) and non-phosphoryrPheOH) (2.2 A Ê resolution) states16 (PDB lated (rPheOH) (2.6 A respectively 1PHZ and 2PHM). Tetrameric rat TyrOH (rTyrOH) catalytic plus tetramerization Ê domains have been determined to 2.3 A 17 resolution (PDB 1TOH) as well as its complex Ê resolution18 (PDB 2TOH). with BH2, also to 2.3 A Although these structures together with sitedirected mutagenesis have signi®cantly improved our understanding of the catalytic and regulatory properties of the enzyme, they have given only partial information on the catalytic mechanism since all the structures relate to the catalytically inactive Fe(III) form of the enzyme and the binary complex with the inactive BH2 pterin cofactor. In the present study, therefore, we have determined the high-resolution X-ray structures of anaerobic crystals of the catalytically competent reduced form of the dimeric ``catalytic domain'' and its complex with the catalytically active form of the pterin cofactor, BH4. Our structures differ from the previously determined structures in the overall iron-coordination geometry and conformation of the cofactor bound at the active site. Results Overall structure of the reduced catalytic domain of hPheOH, hPheOH-Fe(II) The reduced dimeric truncated form (residues 103-427) of recombinant hPheOH crystallized in Ê , b 108.4 A Ê, space group C2221 (a 66.3 A Ê c 124.0 A) with one monomer per asymmetric unit and a solvent content of 57 %. The ®nal model includes 307 residues, 278 water molecules and the active site iron in the Fe(II) form. That the iron is indeed reduced is supported by three criteria: (i) At the selected anaerobic conditions the active site iron (midpoint potential of 207 10 mV for wildtype hPheOH (wt-hPheOH))19 is ef®ciently reduced by the high concentration of dithiothreitol (DTT) (midpoint potential of ÿ330 mV) and sodium dithionite (DTN) (midpoint potential ÿ1120 mV); (ii) the active site structure is slightly different from that of the Fe(III) structure including coordinating water molecules (Table 1); (iii) in the binary complex the autooxidizable pterin cofactor (BH4) bound at the active site is preserved in its structurally characteristic tetrahydro form (see below and Discussion) and the reduction potential of qBH2 (174mV) is below that for Fe(III). The hPheOHFe(II) crystal was crystallized similarly, with even higher concentration of reducing agent, as the binary hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 complex. The structure has been re®ned to a working R-factor of 19.7 % and a free R-factor 25.2 % for all data from 10 to Table 1. Comparison of Fe-ligand distances and ligand B-factors hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 Ligand His285Ne His290Ne Glu330Oe Wat1 Wat2 Wat3 hPheOH-Fe(III)BH10 2 hPheOH-Fe(II) hPheOH-Fe(III)13 P-rPheOH- Fe(III)16 rTyrOH- Fe(III)17 rTyrOH-Fe(III) BH18 2 Distance Ê) (A B-factor Ê 2) (A Distance Ê) (A B-factor Ê 2) (A Distance Ê) (A B-factor Ê 2) (A Distance Ê) (A B-factor Ê 2) (A Distance Ê) (A B-factor Ê 2) (A Distance Ê) (A B-factor Ê 2) (A Distance Ê) (A B-factor Ê 2) (A 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 16.7 16.3 23.1 26.1 20.5 20.0 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.6 2.2 2.3 25.0 22.6 32.5 47.5 34.0 25.5 2.1 2.1 2.4 26.1 24.9 30.5 29.7 22.1 36.8 2.2 2.4 2.1 45.1 33.0 43.4 2.1 2.2 2.0 43.4 39.2 37.4 36.3 21.4 23.5 26.3 41.5 34.6 20.0 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.8 25.8 2.3 2.4 45.2 56.7 2.0 2.0 58.5 35.5 Ligand numbers for TyrOH are His331, His336 and Glu376, respectively. 282 Ê resolution, and there are no outliers in the 1.7 A Ramachandran plot. The overall fold is very similar to the corresponding high-spin (S 5/2) Fe(III) form of the enzyme.13 However, some interesting differences were observed at the active site where signi®cant electron density was found for only one of the three water molecules coordinated to the iron in the Fe(III) form (see also below for the binary complex) as well as weak and poorly de®ned electron density for Cg and the carboxyl group of Glu330 (Figure 2(a)). The distinct metal coordination environment of the Fe(II) form does not extend into the second sphere hydrogen bonding pattern. The liganded Oe of Glu330, which in Ê compared to our structure is displaced 1.2 A hPheOH-Fe(III), and Wat3 have slightly longer bonds to the iron (Table 1) than in the Fe(III) form. Weak omit density was observed for Wat1 and Wat2 during re®nement (Figure 2(a)), but inclusion of these two water molecules gave 2Fo ÿ Fc density X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Ê 2, at the noise level and B-factors of 66.2 and 37.8 A respectively. Thus, only Wat3 was included in the ®nal model. Similar results were obtained with a Ê data set from a crystal that was produced 2.0 A anaerobically by using 30 mM DTN as the reducing agent (data not shown). Several data sets on crystals without reducing agent all revealed strong electron density for all three coordinated water molecules (data not shown) as previously observed.13 Overall structure of the binary hPheOHFe(II) BH4 complex The truncated form (residues 103-427) of the reduced hPheOH co-crystallized with BH4 in space Ê , b 108.5 A Ê , c 124.4 A Ê) group C2221 (a 66.4 A with one monomer per asymmetric unit and a solvent content of 57 %. The rod-shaped crystals formed were slightly different from those without Figure 2. Stereo picture of the electron density at the iron active site of hPheOH-Fe(II) (a) and hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 (b). Blue electron density is from s-weighted 2Fo ÿ Fc maps at 1.7 s. No density appears for Wat1 and Wat2 in the hPheOH-Fe(II) structure, while Glu330 is in a different conformation in the hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 structure. Red omit electron density is from s-weighted Fo ÿ Fc maps at 4.5 s omitting water ligands and the side-chain of Glu330. The Figure was produced using BOBSCRIPT.20 283 X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase bound cofactor. The ®nal model includes 307 residues, 393 water molecules, the active site iron in the ferrous form (see above) and the cofactor in its reduced form. It has been re®ned to a working R-factor of 15.7 % and a free R-factor 20.3 % for all Ê resolution, and there are no data from 10 to 1.5 A outliers in the Ramachandran plot. The overall fold is very similar to the corresponding ligand-free form of the enzyme13 and BH4 binds in the second coordination sphere of the iron (Figure 3). In marked contrast to the ligand-free Fe(II) form, the hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 complex has well de®ned electron density for Glu330 and for all three water molecules (Wat1-3; Figure 2(b)) previously shown to be coordinated to the iron in the Fe(III) form. The iron coordinating Wat1 is hydrogen bonded to BH4 O4, the non-coordinating Glu330 Oe and Tyr325 OZ in a tetrahedral fashion (Figure 4). Wat2 forms a water-mediated hydrogen bond to BH4 N5, while Wat3 forms hydrogen bonds with Glu286 Oe2 and BH4 O4 (Figure 4). All the atoms of the cofactor including the dihydroxypropyl sidechain have well de®ned electron densities (Figure 5(a) and (b)). The pterin ring is approxiÊ mately planar except for C6, which is about 0.6 A out of the plane, con®rming that the bound cofactor has been successfully kept in the reduced state22,23 since the oxidized form, BH2, is strictly planar.24 Superposition of the structure on the hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2 complex10 (PDB 1DMW) shows that the reduced cofactor is displaced about Ê in the direction away from Ser251, and that 0.5 A the pterin ring is rotated about 10 (along the C4aC8a bond) with the pyrimidine ring rotated towards Phe254. Furthermore, the dihydroxypropyl group has a completely different conformation. The torsion angle between the hydroxyl groups in the binary hPheOH-Fe(III)BH2 complex is about 53 , versus ÿ65 in the binary hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 complex and versus ÿ60 in hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2 as determined by NMR.25 This enables the BH4 O20 Ê ) with the to make a strong hydrogen bond (2.4 A Figure 3. MOLSCRIPT2 Figure of the catalytic domain showing the binding of BH4 in the second coordination sphere of the iron. Iron ligands and BH4 are shown as ball-and-stick models with larger spheres for BH4. Carbon atoms are black, nitrogen blue and oxygen red. a-Helices are coloured green, b-strands are orange and the iron is purple. side-chain oxygen of Ser251, while O10 forms water-mediated hydrogen bonds to residues Ala322 and Glu330 (Table 2, Figure 4). In addition, Glu330 adapts a completely different conformation (Figure 6). The coordination of Glu330 is still Ê , and the monodentate, but Cg is displaced by 1.4 A e Ê coordinating C is displaced about 1.0 A compared to the crystal structures of non-liganded hPheOHFe(III) and the binary hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2 complex. Leu255 adapts the same conformation as in the binary complex hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2, which is different from the non-liganded structure, forming two hydrophobic contacts with C30 at a distance of Ê . C30 and C20 interacts with Ala322 Cb 3.7 A Table 2. Potential hydrogen bonds and water-mediated hydrogen bonds between BH4 and hPheOH Ê) Distance (A N1-Leu249 N N2-Gly247 O N3-Wat4 O4-Wat1a O4-Wat3a N5-Wat5 N8-Leu249 O O10 -Wat6 O10 -Wat7 O20 -Ser251 Og O20 -Wat8 O20 -Ala322 O Wat4-Glu286 Oe1 3.1 (3.3) 2.9 (2.8) 2.7 (2.7) 2.7 (2.5) 2.7 (2.8) 2.7 2.9 (2.8) 3.1 2.7 2.4 3.3 (2.8) 2.5 (2.6) Ê) Distance (A Wat4-His264 O Wat1a-Glu330 Oe1 Wat1a-Tyr325 OZ Wat3a-Glu286 Oe2 Wat5-Wat9 Wat5-Wat7 Wat5-Wat2a Wat6-Ala322 O Wat7-Glu330 Oe1 N8-Wat10 Wat10-Ser251 Og Wat10-Leu249 O Wat10-Wat11 2.7 (3.0) 2.5 (2.6) 2.5 (2.7) 2.7 (2.7) 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.6 (3.2) (3.2) (3.2) (2.6) Distances in parentheses are for the crystal structure of the binary hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2 complex.10 Glu330 Oe1 is the noncoordinating oxygen. a Water molecules liganded directly to iron. 284 X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Figure 4. Schematic diagram of BH4-protein interactions. The BH4 molecule is shown with purple bonds, nitrogen atoms are blue, oxygen atoms red, water oxygens green, carbon atoms black and the iron is yellow. The Figure was produced using LIGPLOT,21 and edited using CorelDRAW 9.0. Ê . Leu248 is in a (Figure 4) at distances of 3.8 A different conformation to that in the binary Ê from the pterhPheOH-Fe(III) BH2, with Cg1 3.7 A in ring. Some additional conformational changes are observed upon binding of BH4 when compared to the non-liganded Fe(III) structure.13 Residues 245-250 are closer to the iron with a maximum disÊ for Gly247 Ca. The placement (main chain) of 1.5 A 380's loop13 is also slightly displaced with a maxiÊ. mum movement at Thr378 Ca of 1.0 A Many of the BH4 contacts with the enzyme are, however, similar to those reported for the binary hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2 structure, e.g. the hydrogen bonding network of the pterin ring as described in Figure 4 and Table 2, and the p-stacking interactions with Phe254. However, several additional water-mediated hydrogen bonds were observed in the hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 structure, probably due to Ê resolution. the higher 1.5 A Discussion Changes in the coordination of the catalytic iron on reduction Most structural and spectroscopic studies to date on PheOH have focused on different ferric forms of the enzyme since they are experimentally more accessible.3,26 However, from a functional point of view structural information on the catalytically competent ferrous form is even more relevant. So far, only magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) and X-ray absorption spectroscopic (XAS) studies on the wild-type rPheOH-Fe(II) form have been performed and interpreted in terms of a six-coordinated distorted octahedral geometry.27 The iron coordination in the reduced form was reported to be not ``drastically'' different from that of PheOHFe(III). The active-site iron in PheOH-Fe(III), as isolated, has electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) 285 X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Figure 5. Top (a) and side (b) view of the electron density of tetrahydrobiopterin contoured as 2Fo ÿ Fc maps at 1.7 s showing that all atoms are well de®ned. The non-planarity of the pyrazine ring can clearly be identi®ed in (b). The Figure was produced using BOBSCRIPT.20 signals characteristic of high-spin (S 5/2) ferric iron,19,28,29 which disappear under catalytic turnover conditions. Although a prereduction of the active-site iron is an obligate step prior to catalysis30 relatively little is known about the mechanism of this reduction.26 Reduction of rPheOHFe(III) by 6-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin (or under anaerobic conditions by DTN) causes a decrease in the high-spin g 4.3 EPR signal of the oxidized enzyme,29 ± 31 and interestingly, DTNreduced rPheOH has been reported to be kinetically indistinguishable from the 6-methyl-5,6,7,8tetrahydropterin prereduced enzyme.26,31 In the recombinant catalytic domain of hPheOH used in the present study the high-spin Fe(III) form has been found by EPR spectroscopy to have a more homogenous iron coordination geometry than in e.g. the rat liver enzyme29 and in recombinant wt-hPheOH.19 In the present crystal structure reduced, catalytically competent enzyme was obtained by anaerobic reduction with DTT or DTN. The structure revealed that the six-coordinated iron observed in the hPheOH-Fe(III) form13 is less apparent in the reduced form with well de®ned electron density only observed for the most tightly bound axial water molecule (Wat3). However, weak omit density is present for Wat1 and Wat2 (Figure 2(a)) implying that, in spite of the high concentration of DTT the structure may Figure 6. Superposition of the structures hPheOHFe(III) BH2 (orange), hPheOH-Fe(II) (blue) and hPheOHFe(III) (red) on the structure hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 (green), showing the different positions of Glu330. Note that all four structures contain Wat3. The Figure was prepared using MOLSCRIPT.2 contain traces of Fe(III) or of a six-coordinate Fe(II) form. Interestingly, Wat1 and Wat2 are also absent in P-rPheOH16 (PDB entry 2PHZ) which also has an ``orthorhombic'' iron with the ligands Wat1 and Wat2 missing. However, it should be noted that this structure is solved to a lower resolution Ê ). Furthermore, the Fe(II)-hPheOH structure (2.2 A implies a displacement and possible disorder for Glu330, which cannot be ®tted completely into the observed density (Figures 2(a) and 6). The Feligand distances and geometry also slightly changed upon reduction, with longer iron distances for Wat3 and the liganding Glu330 Oe (Table 1). However, no signi®cant change was observed in the overall protein fold. Both the present Fe(II) forms belong to space group C2221, with cell dimensions similar to all previous crystal structures of double truncated hPheOH10,13 so that structural changes must be due to biochemical rather than crystal packing effects. Thus, the only signi®cant change that occurs in hPheOH on reduction of the iron centre is a reduced af®nity for two of the coordinated water molecules, displacement of Glu330 and possible disorder of its side-chain. Binding of the reduced pterin cofactor Previous studies on the double truncated form of hPheOH-Fe(III) have shown that the oxidized cofactor BH2 binds at the active site by an induced ®t mechanism, involving a small conformational change in the protein at the active site10 as well as in the dihydroxypropyl side-chain of the 286 cofactor.10,25 A similar conclusion is reached in the present study on the binding of the reduced cofactor BH4 to the Fe(II) form of the enzyme (Figure 4). The side-chain of Leu255 in hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 is moved compared to the ligand-free structures of hPheOH adapting the same conformation as in hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2. C30 makes two hydrophobic Ê with Cg and Cd of this residue contacts of 3.7 A Ê with Ala322 Cb. Leu248 plus one contact of 3.8 A adopts a different conformation compared to the Ê binary hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2, packing Cg1 3.7 A away from the pterin ring. Re-orientation of the dihydroxypropyl side-chain enables the O20 to Ê ) with the make a strong hydrogen bond (2.4 A side-chain oxygen of Ser251, whereas O10 forms water-mediated hydrogen bonding to residues Ala322 and Glu330. The torsion angles between the hydroxyl groups in both the hPheOHFe(III) BH2 (53 ) and the hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 (ÿ65 ) complexes are different from the theoretical structure of BH4, which suggests two different forms with angles of ÿ164 and 176 , respectively.23 A torsion angle of about ÿ60 was found in PheOH-bound BH2 by NMR.25 The orientation of the pterin ring system in the present BH4 structure and the previous BH2 structure10 are not the same as that in the NMR and computer modeling structure.25 Thus, Glu286 does indeed form two water-mediated hydrogen bonds to the ring system, but these are to O4 and N3 (Figure 4 and Table 2) rather than the guanidinium N2 and N3 as suggested by NMR. The same is true of the cofactor-Fe distances with Fe-N5 at Ê , Fe-O4 at 3.8 A Ê and Fe-C4a at 5.9 A Ê , rather 5.7 A Ê than 4.4, 2.6 and 4.3 A, respectively, in the NMR and computer modeling structure. Thus, our study shows that BH4 is not directly coordinated to the iron. All present crystal structures of PheOH and TyrOH contain a metal ion with up to six ligands, namely two histidine residues, one glutamic acid and one to three water molecules. Together with the metal ion the two histidine residues and Wat3 are almost identically positioned in all these structures. However, there is considerable variation in the orientation of Glu330 and the presence of Wat1 and Wat2. Coordination geometries for the hPheOH structures are given in Table 1. Glu330 seems to adopt two different conformations in the aromatic amino acid hydroxylases. The crystal structures reveal that the conformation in hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 is, with some variation, similar to that observed in rTyrOH-Fe(III)17, the binary and P-rPheOH-Fe(III).16 The rTyrOH-Fe(III) BH18 2 other conformation is observed in hPheOHand the present Fe(III)13, hPheOH-Fe(III)BH10 2 hPheOH-Fe(II) structure, although in the latter case the side-chain is poorly de®ned. The ligand Wat3, which is present in all PheOH and rTyrOH structures reported so far, is hydrogen bonded to the essential Glu286 (Glu332 in TyrOH). This glutamate plays an important role in binding of BH4 through two water-mediated hydrogen bonds (Oe1- X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Wat4-N3 and Oe2-Wat3-O4) (Figure 4), which has been con®rmed by site-directed mutageneses in wt-PheOH32 and the double truncated form used in the present study.10 When present, the ligand Wat1 is consistently hydrogen bonded to Tyr325, which is also involved in BH4/BH2 binding via this water-mediated hydrogen bond to the pterin O4 (Figure 4). However, Wat1 is absent in P-rPheOH and in the present hPheOH-Fe(II) structure. The ®nal ligand, Wat2, is also absent in hPheOH-Fe(II) and in rPheOH-Fe(III). In the hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 Ê ) to a structure Wat2 is hydrogen bonded (2.9 A well de®ned water molecule, Wat5, which lies Ê away from C4a of BH4 and in the correct 3.2 A direction for electrophilic attack of the cofactor. Although only hydrogen bonded, the Wat2 Wat5 pair (Figure 7) is immediately reminiscent of the oxygen binding site proposed in the NMR and computer modeling structure study.25 It is also interesting to note that if the phenylalanine binding site proposed in the NMR and computer modeling structure25 is correct, Wat2 is conveniently placed for attack on the C3-C4 bond in the phenyl ring (Wat2-C3 and Wat2-C4 distances 3.0 and Ê , respectively) and, although 3.2 A Ê away, 2.8 A Wat5 is in the correct direction for attack on C4A in the pterin ring. Fuctional implications The physiological cofactor, BH4, has both a catalytic and a regulatory function in PheOH.30 The enzyme also requires a non-heme iron, and stoichiometric reduction of the iron centre by the cofactor is a prerequisite for catalysis.26 In addition, binding of the cofactor to the active site induces a conformational transition10 that results in an inhibited state of the holo-enzyme. This state is characterized by an inhibition of the phosphorylation of Ser16 in the regulatory domain by cyclic AMPdependent protein kinase and an increase in the concentration of L-Phe required for the several-fold catalytic activation of the tetrameric wild-type enzyme.8 A recent EPR study19 has also shown that binding of the oxidized cofactor (BH2) at the active site of hPheOH-Fe(III) results in the appearance of a less rhombic high-spin ferric iron. Potentiometric titrations with subsequent EPR monitoring revealed that the midpoint potential for the catalytic iron in wt-hPheOH was reduced from 207(10) mV to 110(20) mV on binding BH2. This 100 mV reduction in the midpoint potential was interpreted in terms of a change in the iron coordination environment.19 The present structure of hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 shows that the octahedral arrangement around the iron becomes almost perfect, due to displacement of Glu330 (Table 3, Figure 6), from its position in the binary hPheOHcomplex and its ligand-free form.13 Fe(III) BH10 2 The iron geometry is consistent with the magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) studies of the resting ``Tstate'' of the ferrous form upon addition of the reduced pterin,33 suggesting that the binary 287 X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Figure 7. Stereo picture of the active site of the binary hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 structure plus L-Phe from the (superimposed) ternary hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2 L-Phe NMR structure.25 The Figure shows the Wat2 Wat5 pair reminiscent of the oxygen binding site proposed for the ternary structure.25 The Figure was prepared using MOLSCRIPT.2 hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 complex lacks an open coordination position which would allow the formation of a highly reactive oxygen intermediate. In the presence of both substrate and cofactor MCD has indicated a square-pyramidal ferrous site33 implicating the iron in the coupled hydroxylation and suggesting that a highly reactive oxygen intermediate can only be generated after the binding of both substrate and pterin cofactor. A theoretical calculation using the perturbative Becke-Perdew model (pBP/DN**)34,35 of the PC SPARTAN PRO programme package was performed for the hydroxylated cofactor (4a-hydroxytetrahydrobiopterin) and superpositioned on BH4 in the binary complex presented here. The distance between the oxygen incorporated in the cofactor Ê , which is too and the iron was measured to 6.0 A long for the formation of a Fe(II)-m-peroxo-BH4 intermediate that has been proposed during the activation of dioxygen in TyrOH.36 However, only minor adjustments of the crevice structure or cofactor binding site in the ternary complex (i.e. under turnover conditions) could alter this distance. A change in the binding site of the cofactor seems unlikely due to the strong network of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions, which also is supported by the relatively low B-factors and unambiguous electron density of the cofactor. However, activation by substrate (L-Phe) binding involves a global conformational change of the enzyme3,37 as well as in the active site crevice structure as observed for the pterin cofactor binding, implying a possible bridging of molecular oxygen between C4a and the iron. The conformational Table 3. Comparison of ligand angles at the active site iron ( ) 285Ne-Fe-Wat3 Wat3-Fe-Wat1 Wat1-Fe-330Oe 330Oe-Fe-285Ne 330Oe-Fe-290Ne 290Ne-Fe-Wat3 Wat3-Fe-Wat2 Wat2-Fe-330Oe 285Ne-Fe-290Ne 290Ne-Fe-Wat1 Wat1-Fe-Wat2 Wat2-Fe-285Ne R.m.s. deviation for angles hPheOHFe(II)BH4 hPheOHFe(III)BH210 93 83 91 93 97 88 79 95 99 84 83 94 98 80 69 113 88 87 87 92 96 89 79 95 103 6.3 11.0 10.2 hPheOH-Fe(II) 89 97 86 103 hPheOHFe(III)13 P-rPheOHFe(III)16 rTyrOHFe(III)17 rTyrOHFe(III)BH218 98 80 72 112 85 87 90 91 94 95 73 98 89 93 92 105 89 86 85 93 85 87 96 88 83 101 87 85 88 93 99 88 5.4 6.4 11.3 83 8.7 288 transition which occurs in the enzyme on L-Phe binding has been proposed to result in a reorganization of the pterin binding site, causing the pterin to bind closer to the catalytically important iron centre,27 thereby allowing the enzyme to perform a tightly coupled hydroxylation. Thus, replacement of Wat2 and Wat5 by an approaching O2 molecule in the hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 structure could yield an Fe(II)-O2-BH4 intermediate rather similar to that proposed for the NMR and modelling structure.25 The iron ligand Glu330 adapts a completely different conformation in hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 Ê and the coor(Figure 6), displacing the Cg by 1.4 A Ê as compared to the crystal dinating Oe by 1.0 A structures of the binary hPheOH-Fe(III) BH2 complex10 and its ligand-free form.13 Carboxylate shifts have been observed for other enzymes including the di-iron enzymes ribonucleotide reductase38,39 and methane monooxygenase40, and it has been shown that conformations of carboxylate ligands vary with the oxidation state of the metals. Carboxylate shifts are believed to be the key features for understanding the oxygen activation mechanism in ribonucleotide reductase41,42 and methane monooxygenase.40 We therefore strongly believe that the carboxylate shift of Glu330 and the disorder/mobility of this side-chain are particularly important for the oxygen activation. Evidence for only one pterin cofactor binding site In addition to its catalytic function, the pterin cofactor BH4 also functions as a potent negative effector that inhibits L-Phe activation by forming a binary enzyme BH4 complex.43 BH4 binds with high af®nity,8,43 and on the basis of pre-steadystate and steady-state catalytic behaviour of rPheOH it has been proposed that the inhibitory effect is mediated by its binding to a second, regulatory site different from the active site.43 Furthermore, on the basis of crystal structure analyses of a dimeric C-terminal truncated form of rPheOH with catalytic and regulatory properties of the wild-type enzyme, a cofactor binding site in the regulatory domain, distant from the active site, has also been proposed.16,44 However, no signi®cant structural evidence has so far been presented in support of such a binding site.3,11 On the contrary, the crystal structure analysis of the binary hPheOHFe(III) BH2 complex has revealed that pterin binding to the active site induces localised conformational changes in the crevice structure as well as in the pterin molecule.10 Furthermore, superposition of this binary complex onto the crystal structure of the ligand-free dimeric rPheOH,16 which contains both the regulatory and catalytic domains, revealed that the C20 -OH group of BH2 is suf®Ê ) to form hydrogen bonds to ciently close (2.7 A Ser23.10,11 The present study has con®rmed this observation and has given additional information on the substantial conformational changes that occur at the active site in response to BH4 binding, X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase notably at the iron ligand Glu330, which adapts a completely different conformation from that in the non-liganded form of the enzyme. Materials and Methods Crystallization and data collection The double truncated mutant (N1-102/C428-452) of hPheOH was expressed and puri®ed,45,46 and crystals were grown using some modi®cations to the previously described method.47 The hanging-drop vapour-diffusion technique was used with anaerobic conditions (N2 atmosphere) in a glove box. Reservoir solutions (20 % (w/v) PEG 2000, 10 % (v/v) ethylene glycol and 0.12 M Na-Hepes pH 6.8) were ¯ushed with N2 through a microporous gas distributor, and solid DTT or sodium DTN was subsequently dissolved in the reservoir solution to a concentration of 200 mM (DTT) and deoxygenated. 5 ml of the protein solution (5.5 mg/ml) in 20 mM Na-Hepes (pH 6.8), 75 mM NaCl were mixed with an equal volume of the anaerobic reservoir solution. The crystallization tray with 625 ml reservoir solution was sealed by high vacuum grease and stored in the anaerobic glove box. For the crystallisation of the binary hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 complex, the reservoir included 10 mM BH4 and 150 mM DTT was used. Crystal growth was complete within four days. Crystals were selected and ¯ash frozen in liquid nitrogen directly from the drop, the whole operation being carried out in the glove box. The crystals without cofactor were thin plates with approximate dimensions 0.5 mm 0.2 mm 0.05 mm, whereas the crystals of the binary cofactor complex were rod-shaped with dimensions 0.7 mm 0.2 mm 0.1 mm. Diffraction images were collected at 110 K on the Swiss-Norwegian Beamline (BM01) at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble (France), using a MAR345 Research imaging plate system and a Ê . One single crystal was used for wavelength of 0.873 A each data set. An additional separate data set comprising Ê was collected on the data between 10 and 2.54 A hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 (DTT) crystal using a longer crystal to detector distance and shorter exposure time, with the aim of reducing the background and saturation for the low-resolution data. The data were integrated using the programme DENZO,48 while the scaling and merging were performed using SCALA from the CCP4 program suite (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994). The statistics for the data sets are presented in Table 4. Model building and refinement The coordinates for the crystal structure of the catalytic domain of hPheOH-Fe(III)13 (PDB 1PAH) were used as the starting model and for calculating initial phases for both structures. The re®nement was initiated by rigid-body re®nement and simulated annealing methods using CNS version 1.0.54 Further re®nement was performed using SHELX-9755 and the peptide-chain was adjusted manually with the aid of the graphical display programme O.56 The electron density maps used for the manual adjustments were s-weighted,51 2Fobs ÿ Fcalc and Fobs ÿ Fcalc calculated by SHELX-97. 10 % of the data were excluded in the re®nement for cross-validation.49 Water molecules were added gradually in positions with Fobs ÿ Fcalc density exceeding 4 s and 2Fobs ÿ Fcalc 289 X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Table 4. Summary of data-collection and re®nement statistics of the hPheOH-Fe(II) and hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 structures Ê) Resolution (A Ê) Cell dimensions (A Number of observations Number of unique reflections Multiplicity Rmerge (%) I/s(I) Completeness (%) Ê 2) Wilson B (A Ê) Resolution range in refinement (A Number of atoms in refinement Number of solvent molecules R-factor (%) Rfree (%)49 Ê 2) Average protein B-factor (A Ê 2) Average cofactor B-factor (A Ê) R.m.s. deviation for bond lengths (A R.m.s. deviation for bond angles (deg.) R.m.s. deviation for dihedral angles (deg.) R.m.s deviation for improper angles (deg.) Ê )50 Luzatti r.m.s. coordinate error (A Ê )51 sA r.m.s. coordinate error (A f and c angles in most favoured regions (%)a f and c angles in additional allowed regions (%)a f and c angles in generously allowed and disallowed regions (%)a hPheOH-Fe(II) hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 25-1.7 a 66.33, b 108.42,c 124.02 260,644 (33,396) 48,353 (6776) 5.4 (4.8) 7.0 (36.6) 6.4 (2.1) 98.7 (97.8) 24.7 10-1.7 (1.79-1.70) 2814 278 19.7 25.2 27.6 20-1.5 a 66.44, b 108.50, c 124.42 495,560 (61,233) 71,940 (10,450) 6.9 (5.9) 5.1 (37.0) 8.7 (2.0) 99.9 (100.0) 18.4 10-1.5 (1.58-1.50) 3041 393 15.7 20.3 19.5 25.6 0.012 2.03 23.8 1.26 0.24 0.09 94.4 5.6 0 0.008 2.00 24.0 1.25 0.27 0.18 94.8 5.2 0 Statistics for highest resolution shell are given in parentheses. Statistics from Ramachandran plots52 calculated by PROCHECK53 a density exceeding 1.7 s at hydrogen-bonding distances Ê distance from an oxygen or a nitrogen). Water (2.3-3.4 A Ê 2 were oxygen atoms with B-factors higher than 63 A removed prior to the next re®nement round. The iron and all its ligands were omitted early on in the re®nement to ensure that their positions were unbiased. A theoretical calculation of BH4 using the perturbative Becke-Perdew model (pBP/DN**)34,35 of the PC SPARTAN PRO programme package was performed making the basis for the cofactor restraints concerning bond lengths and 1,3-distances. The theoretical structure matched the electron density impressively even prior to any re®nement. The higher resolution of the hPheOHFe(II) BH4 (DTT) complex made it possible to re®ne the structure with anisotropic B-factors for all non-hydrogen atoms in the protein and the cofactor. B-Factors for the hPheOH-Fe(II) (DTT) structure were kept isotropic, but the re®nement was performed using an overall anisotropic correction. Side-chain atoms outside 1.5 s 2Fobs ÿ Fcalc density were given occupancy zero, and double conformations were included for some sidechains in the latter re®nement rounds. The ®nal models gave R-factors of 15.7 and 19.7 % for the hPheOHFe(II) BH4 (DTT) and the hPheOH-Fe(II) (DTT) structures, respectively. The better quality of the re®ned hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 (DTT) structure is most probably due the anisotropic B-factors, larger volume of the crystals and the separate low-resolution data set collected. Protein Data Bank accession numbers Atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited at the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, with accession numbers 1J8T for the hPheOH-Fe(II) structure and 1J8U for the hPheOH-Fe(II) BH4 binary complex, respectively. The coordinates will remain privileged until 2002-05-22. Acknowledgements This work has been supported by grants from the Norwegian Research Council (NFR), the Norwegian Council on Cardiovascular Diseases, Rebergs legat, L. Meltzer Hùyskolefond, the Novo Nordisk Foundation and the European Commission. We thank Ali Sepulveda MunÄoz for expert technical assistance in preparing the bacterial extracts and fusion protein, the staff of the Swiss-Norwegian Beamlines in Grenoble, France under data collection and Aurora MartõÂnez with co-workers for access to the coordinates of the ternary hPheOHFe(III) BH2 L-Phe NMR structure. References 1. Kaufman, S. (1993). The phenylalanine hydroxylating system. Advan. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 67, 77-264. 2. Kraulis, P. J. (1991). MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallog. 24, 946-950. 3. Flatmark, T. & Stevens, R. C. (1999). Structural insight into the aromatic amino acid hydroxylases and their disease-related mutant forms. Chem. Rev. 99, 2137-2160. 4. Cronk, J. D., Endrizzi, J. A. & Alber, T. (1996). Highresolution structures of the bifunctional enzyme and transcriptional coactivator DCoH and its complex with a product analogue. Protein Sci. 5, 1963-1972. 290 5. Varughese, K. I., Skinner, M. M., Whiteley, J. M., Matthews, D. A. & Xuong, N. H. (1992). Crystalstructure of rat-liver dihydropteridine reductase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 6080-6084. 6. Kaufman, S. (1959). Studies on the mechanism of the enzymatic conversion of phenylalanine to tyrosine. J. Biol. Chem. 234, 2677-2682. 7. Scriver, C. R., Waters, P. J., Sarkissian, C., Ryan, S., Prevost, L., CoÃteÂ, D. et al. (2000). PAHdb: A locusspeci®c knowledgebase. Hum. Mutat. 15, 99-104. 8. Dùskeland, A. P., Dùskeland, S. O., égreid, D. & Flatmark, T. (1984). The effect of ligands of phenylalanine 4-monooxygenase on the cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of the enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 259, 11242-11248. 9. Dùskeland, A. P., Haavik, J., Flatmark, T. & Dùskeland, S. O. (1987). Modulation by pterins of the phosphorylation and phenylalanine activation of phenylalanine 4-mono-oxygenase. Biochem. J. 242, 867-874. 10. Erlandsen, H., Bjùrgo, E., Flatmark, T. & Stevens, R. C. (2000). Crystal structure and site-speci®c mutagenesis of pterin-bound human phenylalanine hydroxylase. Biochemistry, 39, 2208-2217. 11. Flatmark, T., Erlandsen, E., Bjùrgo, E., Solstad, T., Dùskeland, A. P. & Stevens, R. C. (2000). Regulatory properties of tetrahydrobiopterin cofactor bound at the active site of phenylalanine hydroxylase. Pteridines, 11, 34-36. 12. Wang, G. A., Gu, P. & Kaufman, S. (2001). Mutagenesis of the regulatory domain of phenylalanine hydroxylase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 15371542. 13. Erlandsen, H., Fusetti, F., MartõÂnez, A., Hough, E., Flatmark, T. & Stevens, R. C. (1997). Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of human phenylalanine hydroxylase reveals the structural basis for phenylketonuria. Nature Struct. Biol. 4, 995-1000. 14. Fusetti, F., Erlandsen, H., Flatmark, T. & Stevens, R. C. (1998). Structure of tetrameric human phenylalanine hydroxylase and its implications for phenylketonuria. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16962-16967. 15. Erlandsen, H., Flatmark, T., Stevens, R. C. & Hough, E. (1998). Crystallographic analysis of the human phenylalanine hydroxylase catalytic domain with Ê resolution. Biobound catechol inhibitors at 2.0 A chemistry, 37, 15638-15646. 16. Kobe, B., Jennings, I. G., House, C. M., Michell, B. J., Goodwill, K. E., Santarsiero, B. D. et al. (1999). Structural basis of autoregulation of phenylalanine hydroxylase. Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 442-448. 17. Goodwill, K. E., Sabatier, C., Marks, C., Raag, R., Fitzpatrick, P. F. & Stevens, R. C. (1997). Crystal Ê resolution structure of tyrosine hydroxylase at 2.3 A and its implications for inherited neurodegenerative diseases. Nature Struct. Biol. 4, 578-585. 18. Goodwill, K. E., Sabatier, C. & Stevens, R. C. (1998). Crystal structure of tyrosine hydroxylase with Ê resolbound cofactor analogue and iron at 2.3 A ution: self-hydroxylation of Phe300 and the pterinbinding site. Biochemistry, 37, 13437-13445. 19. Hagedoorn, P.-L., Schmidt, P. P., Andersson, K. K., Hagen, W. R., Flatmark, T. & MartõÂnez, A. (2001). The effect of substrate, dihydrobiopterin, and dopamine on the EPR spectroscopic properties and the midpoint potential of the catalytic iron in recombinant human phenylalanine hydroxylase. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 22850-22856. X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase 20. Esnouf, R. M. (1997). An extensively modi®ed version of MolScript that includes greatly enhanced coloring capabilities. J. Mol. Graph. Model, 15, 132134. 21. Wallace, A. C., Laskowski, R. A. & Thornton, J. M. (1995). LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 8, 127-134. 22. Matsuura, S., Sugimoto, T., Murata, S., Sugawara, Y. & Iwasaki, H. (1985). Stereochemistry of biopterin cofactor and facile methods for determination of the stereochemistry of a biologically active 5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin. J. Biochem. 98, 1341-1348. 23. Katoh, S., Sueoka, T. & Kurihara, T. (1993). Theoretical stereostructure of the neutral form of natural tetrahydrobiopterin. Pteridines, 4, 27-31. 24. Bieri, J. H. (1977). The crystal structure of 6-methyl7,8-dihydropterine-monohydrochloride-monohydrate. Helv. Chim. Acta, 60, 2303-2308. 25. Teigen, K., Frùystein, N. A. & MartõÂnez, A. (1999). The structural basis of the recognition of phenylalanine and pterin cofactors by phenylalanine hydroxylase: implications for the catalytic mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 294, 807-823. 26. Kappock, T. J. & Caradonna, J. P. (1996). Pterindependent amino acid hydroxylases. Chem. Rev. 96, 2659-2756. 27. Loeb, K. E., Westre, T. E., Kappock, T. J., Mitic, N., Glasfeld, E., Caradonna, J. P.et al. (1997). Spectroscopic characterization of the catalytically competent ferrous site of the resting, activated, and substratebound forms of phenylalanine hydroxylase. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 119, 1901-1915. 28. Fisher, D. B., Kirkwood, R. & Kaufman, S. (1972). Rat liver phenylalanine hydroxylase, an iron enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 247, 5161-5167. 29. MartõÂnez, A., Andersson, K. K., Haavik, J. & Flatmark, T. (1991). EPR and 1H-NMR spectroscopic studies on the paramagnetic iron at the active site of phenylalanine hydroxylase and its interaction with substrates and inhibitors. Eur. J. Biochem. 198, 675682. 30. Marota, J. J. & Shiman, R. (1984). Stoichiometric reduction of phenylalanine hydroxylase by its cofactor: a requirement for enzymatic activity. Biochemistry, 23, 1303-1311. 31. Wallick, D. E., Bloom, L. M., Gaffney, B. J. & Benkovic, S. J. (1984). Reductive activation of phenylalanine hydroxylase and its effect on the redox state of the non-heme iron. Biochemistry, 23, 1295-1302. 32. Dickson, P. W., Jennings, I. G. & Cotton, R. G. (1994). Delineation of the catalytic core of phenylalanine hydroxylase and identi®cation of glutamate 286 as a critical residue for pterin function. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20369-20375. 33. Kemsley, J. N., Mitic, N., Zaleski, K. L., Caradonna, J. P. & Solomon, E. I. (1999). Circular dichroism and magnetic circular dichroism spectroscopy of the catalytically competent ferrous active site of phenylalanine hydroxylase and its interaction with pterin cofactor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 1528-1536. 34. Becke, A. D. (1988). Density-functional exchangeenergy approximation with correct asymptotic behaviour. Phys. Rev. A, 38, 3098-3100. 35. Perdew, J. P. (1986). Density-functional approximation for the correlation energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. B, 33, 8822-8824. 291 X-ray Studies of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase 36. Francisco, W. A., Tian, G., Fitzpatrick, P. F. & Klinman, J. P. (1998). Oxygen-18 kinetic isotope effect studies of the tyrosine hydroxylase reaction: evidence of rate limiting oxygen activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 4057-4062. 37. Flatmark, T., Stokka, A. J. & Berge, S. V. (2001). Use of surface plasmon resonance for real-time measurements of the global conformational transition in human phenylalanine hydroxylase in response to substrate binding and catalytic activation. Anal. Biochem. 294, 95-101. 38. Nordlund, P., SjoÈberg, B. M. & Eklund, H. (1990). Three-dimentional structure of the free-radical protein of ribonucleotide reductase. Nature, 345, 593-598. 39. Logan, D. T., Su, X. D., Aberg, A., RegnstroÈm, K., Hajdu, J., Eklund, H. & Nordlund, P. (1996). Crystal structure of reduced protein R2 of ribonucleotide reductase: the structural basis for oxygen activation at a dinuclear iron site. Structure, 4, 1053-1064. 40. Rosenzweig, A. C., Nordlund, P., Takahara, P. M., Fredrick, C. A. & Lippard, S. J. (1995). Geometry of the soluble methane monooxygenase catalytic diiron center in two oxidation states. Chem. Biol. 2, 409-418. 41. Andersson, M. E., HoÈgbom, M., Rinaldo-Matthis, A., Andersson, K. K., SjoÈberg, B.-M. & Nordlund, P. (1999). The crystal structure of an azide complex of the diferrous R2 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase displays a novel carboxylate shift with important mechanistic implications for diiron-catalysed oxygen activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 2346-2352. 42. HoÈgbom, M., Andersson, M. E. & Nordlund, P. (2001). Crystal structures of oxidized dinuclear manganese centres in Mn-substituted class I ribonucleotide reductase from Escherichia coli: carboxylate shifts with implications for O2 activation and radical generation. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 6, 315-323. 43. Xia, T., Gray, D. W. & Shiman, R. (1994). Regulation of rat liver phenylalanine hydroxylase III. Control of catalysis by (6R)-tetrahydrobiopterin and phenylalanine. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 24657-24665. 44. Jennings, I. G., Teh, T. & Kobe, B. (2001). Essential role of the N-terminal autoregulatory sequence in the regulation of phenylalanine hydroxylase. FEBS Letters, 488, 196-200. 45. MartõÂnez, A., Knappskog, P. M., Olafdottir, S., Dskeland, A. P., Eiken, H. G., Svebak, R. M. et al. (1995). Expression of recombinant human phenyl- 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. alanine-hydroxylase as fusion protein in Escherichia coli circumvents proteolytic degradation by host cell proteases. Isolation and characterization of the wildtype enzyme. Biochem. J. 306, 589-597. Knappskog, P. M., Flatmark, T., Aarden, J. M., Haavik, J. & MartõÂnez, A. (1996). Structure/function relationships in human phenylalanine hydroxylase. Effect of terminal deletions on the oligomerization, activation and cooperativity of substrate binding to the enzyme. Eur. J. Biochem. 242, 813-821. Erlandsen, H., MartõÂnez, A., Knappskog, P. M., Haavik, J., Hough, E. & Flatmark, T. (1997). Crystallization and preliminary diffraction analysis of a truncated homodimer of human phenylalanine hydroxylase. FEBS Letters, 406, 171-174. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326. Kleywegt, G. J. & BruÈnger, A. T. (1996). Checking your imagination: applications of the free R value. Structure, 4, 987-904. Luzzati, V. (1952). Traitement statistique des errors dans la determination des structures cristallines. Acta Crystallog. 5, 802-810. Read, R. J. (1986). Improved Fourier coef®cients for maps using phases from partial structures with errors. Acta Crystallog. sect. A, 42, 140-149. Ramachandran, G. N. & Sasisekharan, V. (1968). Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Advan. Protein Chem. 23, 283-438. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. (1993). PROCHECK - a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallog. 26, 283-291. BruÈnger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W. et al. (1998). Crystallography and NMR system: Aa new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallog. sect. D, 54, 905-921. Sheldrick, G. M. & Schneider, T. R. (1997). SHELXL: High-resolution re®nement. Methods Enzymol. 277, 319-343. Jones, T. A., Zou, J.-Y., Cowan, S. W. & Kjeldgaard, M. (1991). Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallog. sect. A, 47, 110-119. Edited by R. Huber (Received 30 May 2001; received in revised form 28 August 2001; accepted 28 August 2001)
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz