Nitrogen Atoms and Triplet States N2(B3Πg), N2(C3Πu) in Nitrogen Afterglow H. Coitout, G. Cernogora, L. Magne To cite this version: H. Coitout, G. Cernogora, L. Magne. Nitrogen Atoms and Triplet States N2(B3Πg), N2(C3Πu) in Nitrogen Afterglow. Journal de Physique III, EDP Sciences, 1995, 5 (2), pp.203-217. <10.1051/jp3:1995120>. <jpa-00249304> HAL Id: jpa-00249304 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00249304 Submitted on 1 Jan 1995 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés. J. Phvs. 5 France III (1995) 203-217 1995, FEBRUARY 203 PAGE Classification Physics Abstracts 52.80 52.20 Nitrogen Nitrogen Atoms Coitout, H. Laboratoire Physique April 6 R4sum4.- Cemogora G. de (Received est ddduite sitd atomique model, density. higher N~(B~II~),N~(C~ f) States in augmente The it is shown Atomic 5 x due that density I0~~cm~ et 8 des partir Plasmas, des July 1994, d'un avec dues to the is durde de pour ) of N~(B~ J7~ repopulation via deduced des montrd est observ6e est la par que le from density the fluorescence observed with pulse Frauce temps duration in state. a post- une pooling caract£ristique de atomique. La densit6 densitds sup6rieures h 5 x10~~ cm~ ~ de l'impulsion. and increases dons reaction d'azote N~(C~ J7~ ) states is observed pooling reaction of N~(A~ Z)) characteristic decay time depends on N~(C~ J7~ This it Orsay Cedex, 91405 1994) October repeuplement un densit6 la l'intensitd et 28 N~(C~J7~) et h cin6tique, modkle observ6e la accepted sont Paris-Sud, Uriiversit6 N~(B~J7~) £tats N~(C~ H~) ddpend fluorescence is Magne L. fluorescences fluorescence la fluorescence than A l'dtat de de Abstract. This revised Ces Z)). N~(A~ d6croissance de Gaz fluorescence temporeIIe. dtats and des 1993, La ddcharge entre Triplet and Afterglow time From d'atomes La den- afterglow. a kinetic nitrogen of N~(C~J7~) for density intensity. dud current the atomic Introduction 1. nitriding metallic for surcathodes [1]. using samples as Nitride efficiency mixture. layer production is a function of the Process ionic bombardsurface [2J. In industrial the sample heating is due to temperature reactor, the injected in The sample electrical temperature is then adjusted with the ment. reacpower drives metallic sample and reactive nitrogen producthe heating of the So, the discharge tor. and damage on tion. Unfortunately, with d-cdischarges, some arcs occur some can cause nitriding in studied treated order eliminate these authors have surfaces. In to arcs, some reactive pulsed discharges [3J and in flowing afterglows [4]. In the flowing experiments, the created and blown the excitation species are downstream samples, out of the upstream on So, nitrogen production is disconnected from the heating which be active sample zone. can extemal controlled by an device. In pulsed discharges, sample heating and active nitrogen production discharge as in d-climits done by the conditions, but, pulsed mode arc are proLow faces. discharges are mainly working depends on the gas nitrogen pressure The reactors are duction. Q Les Editions de Physique 1995 used in with d-c- industrial discharges reactors JOURNAL 204 PHYSIQUE DE N° III 2 flowing afterglow or pulsed discharges, the reactive gas is submitted during a short time discharge. In flowing afterglow this time is a function of the gas flow and the discharge length. In pulsed discharge this time is the pulse duration. order understand the discharge evolution and to obtain In temporal data for the optimito of atomic zation nitrogen production, it is important to know the characteristic times to populate and to electronic and characteristic times nitrogen relaxe also the of molecular states In the to dissociation direct . reassociation. and discharges, electrical In potential vibration the pumping vibrational last of The characteristic electronic molecular ground higher molecular ground leading of time transfers energy molecular of level inelastic by occurs the on electron-vibration and dissociation vibrational state [5, 61 processes two leading levels to first the collisions ground to by levels vibration- pseudolevel vibrational a above state. in process molecules on vibrational state order the on about : I ps P= at of the I Ton characteristic for a time equal to I eV. The second is temporal linked evolutions of the to the process ground Vibrational distribution distribution and the electron function state energy slow (characteristic time longer than 1 ms) [6]. are nitrogen density Some atomic have performed by NO titration been measurements by V-U-V- optical absorption [8], mainly in flowing afterglows. spectroscopy measured In this presented fluorescences in a N~(C~ H~) and N~(B~ H~) paper are terglow. These fluorescences compared with the calculated deduced from a are ones, taking into model the coupling between account N~(A~ Z(), N~(B~ H~) and N~(C~ H~ molecu- energy the and of electron mean lar states a ; curve anharrnonic . impact electronic repulsive nitrogen molecular which [71 time or af- kinetic triplet density. atomic Experiment 2. experimental The pulsed are flow keeps adjusted by ent is gen stream. measured by to order discharge then the gauges two pumped is : with down high a 10~ to The pulse is adjusted by duration pulse duration be fixed from can The rise and light The selection channel 6 k Data In the molecules scaler ~ slit, a in cm 160 the transferred and are the to in a the first PC the 5 by high a voltage tube axis detected to positive U-V- heated is hour before which is at downgauge 200 °C an a experiments, the repetition rate also from used 10 through a MgF~ window. (HRS2 Jobin Tvon). side-on photomultiplier a 930 with range. nm The System Research counting. photons photomultiplier 5R440) The photons 100 to Hz. Wavelength Behind the (R943-02 signal output connected trigger. as Hz to counting a is is multi- done wide. computer near one generator I ps. capacitance a tube monochromator resolved ns ms the pump. and about (Standford 160 each are is nm pulse to focal light the fast channels visible [91 64 25 ps diffusion a master a during flow gas by ton pulse along the preamplifier (5R430) for time (6144) are by sensitive a of observed out exit Hamamatsu), amplified with over is carried monochromator time fall emitted is produced is and upstream gauge cleanliness and purity, The time discharge The I. pirani a nitrogen improve maintained is tube Figure in shown tube of 50 cm length and 1.5 cm intemal diameter. nitroA weak pyrex a the gas in high purity condition without gradient. Flowing conditions pressure needle valve and a throttle valve downstream. The gradiupstream a pressure In d-c- is device in generator, to range system be the analyzed. more intense observed bands of the neutral N° NITROGEN 2 ATOMS AND STATES TRIPLET 205 t2 P-u N-v ~ v c-c P-c ~i ++~ ~ I I j Hv-p-c ' I i JOURNAL 206 N+N+N~ coefficient The for this effect range order to minimize pressure In tow. level of lower than v'= 11 in occur of Because level but of cm~ s~ [101. important be can for give can In fluorescence We the of our a few than vibra- lower vibrational this that part higher the on suppose can lower the pressures observe we recombination, the transfers. vibration-vibration wavelength the N~(B~ H~) of ~~ 2.4x10~ = effect levels does not afterglow. early the ~ reassociation Atomic after N~(B~IT~,v'=11)+N~. ~ contribution the N~(B~ H~ ). tional 2 N° III Lj_~ is k~ process is negligible, this PHYSIQUE DE v'= 2. is of range The optical our intense more device, transition is the vibrational observable lower : N~(B~IT~,v'=2)~N~(A~J7),v"=0)+hv which is emitted at Experimental 3. Figure 2a d=700ps. Following sion for = 775.4 nm. Results the presents In I the this fast higher N~(C~H~) post-discharge, decay, a weak P=0.9 pressure a emission fast for decay fluorescence and Ton can be due seen. pulse shorter a and P=0.2Ton mainly to Figure 2b pulse long a radiative losses duration observed. N~( C~ H~ ) shows d=50ps. duration is In these emis- condi- fluorescence becomes important. the more Figures 3a and 3b present typical fluorescence semilogarithmic normalized in N~(C~ n~) plots. In the former, we see that the fluorescence characteristic time shorter the becomes as pulse duration d increases. The later the shows that the fluorescence shorter becomes one as discharge figures, it can be seen that the increases. In both fluorescence be current can correctly described by a monoexponential decay. So, we use a non linear regression in order to fit experimental fluorescences by a function on the form : tions, I ~s I fi d ° t ~ ~ ~ fl fi g w fi ~ 200 o MO 600 Time Fig. of 2. a) Typical N~( C~ J7~, v'= 4 ) 800 loco 1200 o 20 4O 60 (ps) record emission. N~(C~J7~,v'=4) for P = 0.9 Ton, d = emission. 50 vs. P=0.2 Ton, loo 80 Time 120 14O 160 (ps) d=700 vs. b) Typical record N° NITROGEN 2 ATOMS TRIPLET AND STATES 207 SO Pa loo pa = 200 Pa z u w I 8 g fi u g ~ soo pa 30 mA ~ ~ ~ z i o ms ~ ~o.1 s ~o loo fl ma mA ~ 3oO ~ soo ~~~ 200 loo o Fig. P = 0.2 Tow, charge 1= b) 100 mA. values. current P SOD o N~(C~ J7~, = 0.9 Ton, v'= 4 d influence in pulse of Figures duration and 4a 300 = and ) for fluorescence soo MO several 700 600 Boo (ps) pulse fluorescence duration for values. several dis, 50 vs. = shown 200 N~( C~ J7~, v'= 4 post-discharge Nonnalized jN~(C~1I~jjit) The loo Time post-discharge Normalized a) 3. MO 30O (ps) Time discharge Cexp(current on vi). the N~(C~ H~ ) decay frequency v is 4b. measured normalized comparison between N~(B~H~) and N~(C~H~) fast conditions. Emission from N~(B~ H~) presents experimental a characteristic decay times of decay in the early afterglow. It is important to notice that the observed by de This been the last point has value in the far afterglow. both reach states same They analyzed the mixture [IIIin pulsed discharge in He,N~ Benedictis R-Fal. et has the exponential decays. The slowest of three fluorescence the N~(B" H~ same one as sum characteristic decay time as N~(C~ H~). Figure 5 fluorescences 4. shows in the a same Modeling this from emission lifetime is equal to 37 ns [91. Consequently, state N~(C~ H~) radiative an gain explained by only be during the post discharge can processes. ground molecular from collisions electronic of N~(C~ H~ ) and N~(B~ H~ by The excitation the afterglow, the and 7.4 eV. In equal 11.I eV respectively require electron to state energy that work, decrease [121. In this of electrons density and the mean electron assume we energy populated is no distribution function electrons in the afterglow, the tail of the more energy species life triplet Some long significant excitation of obtain enough in order to states. are a vibrational levels species mainly the afterglow. These in the present are molecular atomic ground state N(~S ) and molecular ground state, metaN~(X~ Z), w) of the Z(, Z(). directly repopulate w) molecules that stable We N~(X~ cannot N~(A~ state suppose [131. N~(B~ H~) and N~(C~ H~) states but can play an important role in a stepwise process Z( ), the only radiative transitions Kaplan bands [91. These the Vegard Conceming N~(A~ are with forbidden losses be neglected in comparison transitions and then the radiative can are JOURNAL 208 ~ 3 # . © III N° 2 ~ 100 £ ~ PHYSIQUE DE 3 05 Tom P m PUO ~ Pm 0 5 Tom 9To« E o c g o w ~' * ~ * C . p * ~ m ) © ~ ~ ~ ~ m , " . p m ~ © , o . ii m ~ ~~~~ loo Discharge ~°°° Duration In ps SO ~ ~fl ~ # °S f I ~ °"~°'9edumtion=~ue O oiwh.,gedu,won=loop. m Diwhab9edumfion=2Xps ~° °«h.b9°dU<.b°n=»v, w + oi«h.,godumbon=w, * 01wne<godumUn=7Xpa © CL w 30 Ul M x W C ~ i I 20 cb 2 ~ g~ g lo O ru Z 0 200 0 4o0 Discharge Fig. veral the b) 1=300mA. pulse other duration loss values. v'= 4 P=0.5 main loss The Effective about Tow. Because pressure N~(B~ H~) one and frequency 600 in mA pulse versus frequency duration for discharge versus severaI pressure for current se- Ton. atoms. for ) decay N~(C~J7~,v'=4) decay processes. and of N~(C'J7~, Experimental quenching by [lsl source Experimental al 4. values. Current for processes lifetime of its N~(C~ H~) production of this N~(A~ state long lifetime, via pooling Z() is are N~(A~ Z() reactions. diffusion the typically of is some probably to the wall milliseconds the main N° 2 NITROGEN ATOMS TRIPLET AND STATES 209 Calculation w I ~ # ~ ~ N~(C) ~ msasunsmBnt o-I ~o _~ N~(8) measurement 15 E ~ o.01 o 200 100 Time Fig. Experimental 5. 1=100mA and this calculation In d= the . N~( B~ H~ ) N~( A~ Z( ) and R7 reaction According to these N~(A~ Z) ), N~(X~ Z)) . fluorescences Comparison 50 vs. remarks, N~( C~ H~ ) pooling and we assume that transfers radiative A~ J7) N~( C~ lT~ ) ~ N~ ( B~ J7~ ) N~( A~ Z) ) ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ hv RI + hv R2 ~~~Lf~ ~2~ ~~ ~ Z) ) R3 X~ 27( ) R4 + N~( X~ ~ %~2( lo ) atoms Z) ) + N( ~S ) N~( X,w ~ kA N~( B~ + N~( C~ J7~ ) ~ J~ ) quenching by < + N R5 N molecules N~( B~ J7~ ) + N~ ~ products R6 "Q . collisional transfer N~(A~ Z) . N~(A~ + : N~( X~ Z() diflfizsion Z(, w > 6 ) ki N~( B~ ~ the wall ) J7 ~ x to : frequency v~ P = 0.9 Ton, conditions. N~(B~ with : + N~( A~ coupled : N~ ~2(A ~ Zu ) quenching by is state reactions ~ ~ . N~(C~H~) N~( B~ lT~ ) reactions for [NJ "2.8x10~~cm~~ following the N~( B' J7~, v'= 2 ) for corresponding initial dud fluorescences neglected Z) ) N~( A~ * calculated is N(~S ) by and N~( C~ J7~, v'= 4 ) of with MO 300 (ps) R8 + N~( X' Z~, ~ w 6 ) R7 l§), JOURNAL 210 If Bessel a diffusion coefficient diffusion The D~ [151 The 9 used previously, seen loss is radiative all the collisional all the electronic R2, and Rl Rate coefficients we relevant are considered z~ I. used the = = in presented are without of then N~(C~ H~) that lifetimes I-e- Tow 300 at afterglow the for N~( C~ lT~, v'= 0 ) 8.9 ns for N~( B~ lT~, v'= 0 ) ofN~(A~Z) ), N~(B~ J7~) coefficient Rate = k~~ x lo-to 7 7 X 10'~~ Cm~ g~ ~A~ k~ ~ 2 k~~ ~ x ~ ~ 3 ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ lU'~2 cm3 ~., 10'~° cm~ s'~ R7 the K and P (Ton) ~ coeffi- vibrational is As observed. level v of these states. So, and N~(C~ J7~ ) states. .1 j~~j [23] [24] j25j [26] 1.74x10~ ~~ These I. discrimination. Reference j 5 R4 Table [91 ns kinetics in the 37 the in fluorescence fluorescence the radiative kf~ R8 is radius. of I vibrational suppose describe ~~ R6 D~ where tube the pressure a N~(C~ H~ ) for process reactions can to Reaction R5 for D~ /A~ = if R is R/2A to measured states dependence vibrational have is v~ R2. for z~ Table emission for N~(C~ H~) we length equal N~(A~ Z() has been (for v 0). the only production 2 N° = R3 no processes and of III frequency diffusion the diffusion the cm~ s~ only by been radiative radiative + coefficients have N~(B~ H~) A and reaction lost rate cients the = is state have 155 assumed, is coefficient pooling The this profile radial PHYSIQUE DE ~ jls] we For 0 for for the = N° 2 In the NITROGEN model, kinetic these ATOMS processes AND TRIPLET by the described are A~=~ population the vibrational the radiative into The N~(B~H~, distribution of transition A~ = A~ = 1.39 x 6.25 x evolution time =0) v the between lo? levels v'= 0 10~ s~ for N~( B~ lT~, v'= of triplet three the radiative is which the are depends cascade Therefore, known. not v levels 0 = on only is taken [91 N~( C~ lT~, densities by which for ~ N~( B~ lT~, 0 ~ N~( A~ states is ) Z(, v"= v" = ) 0 ) by described then 0 the following : iN2iBii kl x ~i~(~ii kj = ~ equations These densities. also The During milliseconds. iN21A jiivD A lN~( All lN~( x, w 6 a jN~(Aji~ +A~jN~icjj + + + kA iNi i N II kj jN~iAjjjN~iX,w. ~ * 611 k~jN2 (Xii1 =kj_~jN2(Aii~-AiiN2(Cii. ~~~()~~ [NJ l171 iN2iAii~ kA iN21B11(A4 [NJ are v state populated more =0) s~ of ~~~(~~~~ "A2 and electronic upper the probabilities transition ~4 N~(A~Z(, and probabilities transition The account. equations of 211 A~=~ and ~l The STATES depend temporal the observed on the temporal evolutions of fluorescence, evolution species these we can of are [N~(X~Z), v'=6)J slow, suppose on that [16J and of a few [N~(X~Z),v'a 6)J the order constant. are density at the beginning of the afterglow presented in Table II have been discharges for N~(A~Z() [181, N~(B~H~) [191 and N~(C~H~) [201. The results of a numerical simulation [21]. from the N~(X~ Z), v'a 6 ) density is taken Figure 6 shows calculated N~(A~ Z)), N~(B~ H~ ) and N~(C~ H~ ) densities in the afterglow decays for the three for [NJ =3 x ld~cm~~ and obtain monoexponential P=0.9 Ton. We B~ ) characteristic times which is the The and ) decay the N~(C~ states. N~( H~ not are same, H~ Z)) ) experimental 5). the observations and (Fig. N~(A~ N~(B~ H~ present the contrary to same these reaction R7. decay. This is due to the strong coupling between via the two states N~(X' Z(, v'a 6) density could be reaction overestimated and so, N~(B~H~) gain due to obtain overestimated kinetic scheme, R7 be If reaction R7 in could neglect too. our we we normalized (calculations) shown in Figure 5. A the N~(B~ H~) and N~(C~H~) fluorescences obtained. The calcuwith experimental fluorescences in the far afterglow is good agreement good ) slopes. fastest in The is lated decay of N~(B~ H~ not agreement state presents two one with the is slower. modelling, the fast decay is only due to radiative experiment which In our kinetics. could be a missing fast gain for N~(B~ H~) in our Anyway, loss. So there process this calculated measured fluorescences for disagreement stops in the far afterglow where and experimental fluoparallel. obtain of the becomes Consequently, good fit two states as we a reaction in the far afterglow neglecting R7, we will not consider this rescences any more The values determined process in of in our d-c- kinetics. 212 JOURNAL Table densi~y Initial II. beginning of the at PHYSIQUE DE the N° density (cm'~) lN~(A)lo lN~jB)j~ jN~jc)lo lN~jx)j jN~jx,wm6)j 0.09 6 10~~ 6 10~° 6 lU~ 3,2 10" 1,2 10~~ 0,2 910~~ 8 10~° 5 10~ 7,1 10" 2.810~~ 0,5 1.5 10~~ 10~~ 410~ 1.7 10~~ 6,8 10~~ 0,9 1,2 10~~ 1,1 10~~ 2 10~ 3,2 10~~ 1,410'~ 3,85 5 10~~ 2 10~~ 10~ IA 10~~ lo 2 afterglow. Initial Pressure III 5.6 10~~ ~~ N~(A) / io" I' m E lo ~ " .~ (B) N 2~ _-~~ 2 m I lo ~ (c) N ~~ ios ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 3 10O 300 200 400 Time in Vs Fig. Calculated 6. atomic input as = 3 x of N~(C~J7~), N~(B~J7~) and N~ (A~Z)) for P=0.9 Ton assuming an 10~~ cm~ N~(C~H~) Calculated density densities NJ density fluorescences N~(C~H~) parameter. are shown fluorescence in Figure becomes 7 for shorter P=0.9 Ton as atomic with atomic density in- quenching of N~(A~Z() by atoTnic nitrogen (reaction R5). reduce N~( C~ H~ ) gain by pooling N~( A~ Z( ) losses reaction R3. In Figure 8 the atomic nitrogen density (used as input data) is shown as a function of the calculated N~(C~ H~) decay frequency. For low atonfic density, the dependence of calculated N~(C~ H~) decay frequency on atoJnic density becomes When weak. atomic the density decreases. This is due to the N° NITROGEN 2 N~(A~ creases, then in the from the of that effect this of the increases model the estimations to Figures ~~,2 density 213 the loss by low. becomes diffusion We shown and 9a estimate can we 9b. in In atomic Figures 4a Figure 9a, nitrogen and it can 4b. be ~ 10"cm~ (Nl.310"cm~ cm~ iNisl© 8 # o lo U- 7J _~ l% E iNi s " lo cm $ Z [Mt. i lo,4~~ ~ jN1310"cm~ [N[-210"cm~ / O 01 200 loo 0 Time Fig. 7. N~(C~J7~) Calculated fluorescence for in several 400 300 ps atomic density values, ~~~~ P=3 85 Tom ~ 4 c m m I $~ ~ l ' P=0.9 lE+11 lE+3 Fig. requency for pressure values. Decay (C) N 8, - Calculation can and see decreases. pressure Figure 8 frequencies in shown are towards atomic in shown N~(C~ H~) decay experimental decreases fluorescence as STATES TRIPLET quenching atoTnic N~(C~ H~) of results these by lossed sensitiveness Figure 8 Using the sults Z() AND ATOMS esults. Atomic nitrogen Frequency density P= 0.9 Ton. density Some seen re- that atomic density ciation is atomic density not pulse with increases reached in the increases duration. It the III that seems pulse durations discharge current of case with PHYSIQUE DE JOURNAL 214 steady a shorter for than pulse any 2 N° state for disso- molecular 700 ps. Figure 9b duration value. shows that o o ~ ° i ~m . .,m fl E " ~ . fl ~' ~ ~ m lE+14 ~E * m i=300rrub ~ 5~ ° PC305TO« * P=09Tarr 05Tarr lE+13 loo lo Discharge 1000 Duration in ps lE+15 l' / ro ,,' E / w W Ul W / / , ~~ /~ u / c j~ fig I ~' $ P ' ' ~ / ' ~ A ~schwge = 50 Dischwge dUmlan 100 ps dursban ~ * ps = ~schwge E+12 0 in Current Fig. ~(C'J7~ ) reported from he experimental values in Figure of ~(C'H~ 4a. ) decay equency 9. - b) Atornic reported in mA a) density stimations Figure versus 4b. discharge current 2 N° NITROGEN In experimental our 5 x10~~cm~ 5. Discussion The of results several technic compared be can STATES density 215 2x10~~cm~ from ranges nitrogen discharges atomic with DC of microwave or optical VUV spectroscopy, mass : to absorption [281, in measurements titration NO post using studied were emission and system. used was dissociative ionic nitrogen atomic the afterglows flowing positive absorption VUV by calculations our Mainly, first the conditions, TRIPLET AND ~ discharges. of ATOMS low in afterglow pressure [281. recombination nitrogen where conditions, these In atoms [N] was about instance, in For produced were 10~~ cm~ ~ discharges workplasma, far enough from the discharge in the NO chemiluminescence without perturbation from the light emitted by order titration millisecond the excitation Thus, NO gives [N] only at about one tone. measurements after the discharge. In DC discharge flowing afterglows, for I= loo mA, the UQl density inwith increasing from 0.6 to 2 Tow [291. In from 2 x10~~ cm~ ~ to 10~~ cm~ ~ creases pressure afterglow at 8 Tow, by NO titration microwaves the nitrogen density is about ld~ cm~ ~ [301. Yamashita used by [171 in nitrogen discharge and post discharge. Mass spectroscopy was titration, deduced density is of 4x After calibration with the nitrogen absolute NO an 10~~cm~ ~ in a 4 Tow in discharge and microwave is usable discharge. Mass spectroscopy nitrogen The ing in atoms gas flow, observe to can NO a discharge without nitrogen flowing post In measured be injected is any with limitation, time afterglow, atomic but the to mainly emission the from afterglow, nitrogen atomic at method The Some possible effective have other electronic influence lifetime any v'=10, after the accordance in metastable is shorter influence on system in and 12 11 positive afterglow. first for exist in of develop. to easy the [321. Ton beginning the we lifetime post must is is observed the [NJ measure- discharge, gives discuss their now 54ps. its Moreover does state during nitro- gives pooling system for used (LRA) pure of Because [141. So this process which fluorescence of So radiative positive be cannot [311. In state first the aftergtlow. the quenching of the N~(C~ H~) N~(B~ H~) of Afterglow Rayleigh Lewis P=2 kinetics. presented singlet state N~(a~ H~) because not emission system useable at paper, technic. with other could the emission ld~cm~~ about is ~N~+N~ calibration, NO states the on molecular The levels beginning of the presented in this densities atomic not the positive of above, mentioned reaction ments densities first the vibrational the microwave gen of technic this recombination N+N+N~ leads titration. NO of downstream a few not have hundred microseconds. N~(E"Z~) could lead to the [27J. The ~nly N~(E~ Z~) gain recombination atomic of creation process that N~(C~H~) via maintain could radiative this and density collisional during the transfers afterglow is :~ N( ~S ) + N( ~D ) + N~ Ll N~( E~ ~ Z( ) + N~ N In lifetime overestimate N~(E~ Z() effective we afterglow and we only consider loss processes N~(E~ Z)) density is the solution of the equation order to in the stant Then assume which that lead N(~D) density to N~(C~ H~) is con- creation. JOURNAL 216 PHYSIQUE DE ajN~(Eij v~ is where the of sum frequency, G~ transfer the Einstein the creation is Z() N~(E~ Then density by + N° coefficient and [271 al. et [N2(E )lO " J840s~~ the measured have N~(C~H~). to collisional the iN(~siiiN(~DiiiN~ik[-~. G~= G~ exp(- vE t) G~) $ ~ + E E Bums of recombination atomic is [N2(E)I (t) N~(E~Z() 2 G~ emission spontaneous rate iN~i v~=A~~~+k~~~ iN~( El i v~ = at III radiative Einstein The cascade and the collisional emission spontaneous k~_~ from transfer A~_~ coefficient equal is equal to density can be [N~(E)J(t)~JG~/v~ after approximated initial density [N~(E)J~ assume as an 10~~cm~~ than So N~(C~H~) form lower add gain in the must constant we a "10~~cm~ ~ II [N~(E [N(S II strongly °'G~. We overestimate this gain assuming that can v~ cm~~ =10~~ [N(D)J and metastable atoTnic density (which the maximum is value an meato 5 x 10~ sured 10~ ~~ in pooling is = Ton, Then, 2 and find G~ x10~~cm~ ~ coefficient transfer of because [331) we N~(C~ f ) the on I discharge [101. reaction influence P For D-C- a cm~ s~ collisional the and cm~ s~ ~~ 7.7 it x 10~ cm~ is is estimated efficiency, N~( E~ recombination a = So 5~ quenching 20ps, if we ~ coefficient s~ reasonable while to the assume Z( k$ ~ initial that ~J k$ gain N~(E~ ~ = 2.4 from Z() x the has no fluorescence. Conclusion The of N~( C~ H~ ) is coupled with metastable N~(A~ Z() and nitrogen atom experimental C~ The decay time of N~( different values H~ ) can be fined trying density in the kinetic model. This give a good atom method could estimation discharges. density in electrical atom fluorescence centrations. nitrogen nitrogen con- of of References [II [2] [3] [4] [5] M., J. Appl. Phys. 44 (1973) 1489, Study of ion-nitriding. H. A. et al., Binary Alloy phase Diagrams, A-S-M(October 1986) p. 1081. Henrion G., Fabry M., Hugon R., Bougdira J., Spectroscopic investigation of a Hudis Wriedt temporal postdischarge plasma for ion nitriding, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 1 (1992) II?Ricard A., Oseguera J. E., Falk L., Michel H., Gautois M., Active Species in Microwave Postdischarge For Steel-Surface Nitriding, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 18 (1990) 940. Capitelli M., Dilonardo M., Non-equilibrium dissociation of nitrogen, Rev. Phys. Appl. 13 (1978) lls. [6] J., Loureiro trogen 23 17] Henon (1990) J. Chem. 18] Lin C. Feneira L., M., Capitelli M., Gorse C., comparative analysis of two M., C. discharges a Cacciatore theorical M., Non-equilibrium approaches, J. Phys. kinetics D : in ni- Appl. Phys. 1371. Franklin Phys. 30 Kaufman J. L., Bradt (1959) 879. F., Reactions P., of Dibeler Metastable V. M., Kinetics Nitrogen of Atoms, Nitrogen J. Chem. Atom Phys. Recombination, 55 (1971) 3760. J. N° [9] NITROGEN 2 Krupenie A., Lofthus H., P ATOMS The AND TRIPLET of molecular glow discharge spectrum STATES nitrogen, 217 Phys. J. Ret Chem. 6 (1977) 57 (1985) Data 113. [10] H., Brunet J., Serra Rocca Model for a flowing nitrogen, in Appl. Phys. J. 1574. [I ii de S., Benedictis regime [12] Gorbunov N. A., in the bution G., Dilecce He-N~ of E., Capitelli M., Decay of excited species in discharge », XX ICPIG Conf., Vol. (1991) p. 83. B., Kudryavtsev A. A., Development of the electron nitrogen afterglow in the local regime, Sov. Phys. Schifano pulsed RF Kolokolov plasma N. of a [13] (1991) 6. C., Capitelli M., Coupled Gorse Phys. 62 (1987) 4072. [14] Magne [15] Zipf E. Jr, C. Diffusion Phys. 38 Chem. [16] Capitelli M., [17] Yamashita [18] Cemogora T., Ferreira [21] Touzeau nitrogen glow M., J., Loureiro Piper Ferreira G., L. State Piper State to [24] Piper G., L. Heidner induced [26] Piper G., L. state Bums Queffelec N( Golden J. L., as N., S. At. : Z/ J. state, electronic of 70 and populations (1984) Phys. 17 populations (1984) afterglow, vi~ (1983) L251-256. (1979) 4248. 44 Vibrational Mol. 17 (1983) of N~ 4429. of N~(B~ II~ ) in a of N~(C~ II~ ) in a 4439. populations 450. p. transport I. N~ direct-current in parameters formation The D. W., and of N~( C~ II~ ) and the quenching of (1976) M., Phys. Chem. J. N~(B~ II~, of and (1989) 90 7087. quenching by u laser- 243. in reaction the N~(A~Z)) between transfer to J. C., Gomet the Valise planetary the E~ of excitation Electron in atoms formation The and 864. energy Morlais metastable II. study Kinetic 37 Letters (1989) 91 Galliardt R., B. J., Vibrational « and rates Phys. Vibrational 4 N~(B~II~,u'=l~12) of E., of B. Phys. G., Conf. Letters Chem. G., relaxation the Appl. J. 67. Phys. deactivation Rowe : ICPIG Suchard Phys. Chem. D. source a G., D. excitation J. the A~ 36 Chem. J. Chem. collisional quent 2616. [28] 5), ? J., D. J. Sutton The in energy-pooling reaction. Phys. 88 (1988) 231. N~(A~Z() energy-pooling reaction. Chem. Phys. 88 (1988) 6911. of N(~P) by N~(A~Z(, v'= 0,1). fluorescence. N~(X,u [27] F., R. molecules Z) ) N~( A~ excitation The III nitrogen Lcureiro Mol. At. excitation (1989) system N~(B~II~,u'=1-12). [25] Electron 22 state infrared G., L. to D nitrogen on J. Phys. J. Cemogora M., XVI in Phys. Phys. afterglow, nitrogen a u'= 0~2 J. M., Cemogora Phys. B. », of in distri- energy Tech. N~(a~ II~, consideration Touzeau L., Touzeau M., C. Phys. J. Herrnann [23] L., discharge glow lifetime discharge, Hochard J. metastable scale L., glow discharge, Hochard discharges, [22] M., kinetics nitrogen afterglow. of nitrogen atoms, a Hochard nitrogen M., nitrogen M., C. pure a Time in of radiative recombination Ferreira in C. pure of Rate G., C. pure [20] excited-state and and distributions energy (A~ Z/ Ferreira coefficient (1963) 2034. C., Ricard A., Gorse brational [19] electron L., Cemogora G., Veis P., Relaxation Phys. D. : Appl. Phys. 25 (1992) 472. J. post-discharge « C~ II~ state, F., The atmosphere, Z( J. state Chem. of N~ and subse~ Phys. 65 (1976) recombination dissociative Planet. Space Sci. 33 of 263~70 (1985). [29] Cemogora in [30] Proc. [32] [33] d'azote Campbell L., Hochard nitrogen Chave Normand ou [31] G., pure a I. M., R. Soc. C., Touzeau Etude argon en Thrush London M., discharge, glow mod61isation et flux. B. Ser Phys. Thesis A., The A296 de la At. post Paris Universit6 recombination (1967) states Mol. (1991). nitrogen d'azote Sud of atoms and the nitrogen afterglow. 201-221. A., Oseguera-Pena J. E., Folk L., Michel discharge for steeLsurface nitriding. IEEE m6tastables de Cemogora G., Etude des stats Thesis Universit6 Pads Sud (1980). Ricard B. Population of N~(A~ Z)) metastable Phys. 14 (1981) 2977-87. micro-onde d6charge d'une d6charge M., C. Ferreira J. H., Trans. I'azote Gantois Plasma M., Sci. atomique Active 18 dans species (1990) une in microwave post- 940-4. d6charge luminescente,
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz