Historically Speaking Earle G. Wheeler at 100 J DoD Tonkin Resolution in the aftermath of anuary 13, 2008, marks the oneBy Brig. Gen. John S. Brown the Gulf of Tonkin incident. hundredth birthday of Gen. Earle U.S. Army retired Benefiting from the breadth of his Gilmore Wheeler, Army Chief of Staff from 1962 to 1964, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff professional experience, Gen. Wheeler fulfilled his responfrom 1964 to 1970. Distinguished service brought him to sibilities towards the Vietnam War in a pragmatic, busithese positions of preeminent responsibility and posi- nesslike manner. When the fall of South Vietnam seemed tioned him to be a key strategic player—and the Washing- imminent and President Johnson determined to Americanton, D.C., face of the U.S. military—throughout most of the ize the war, rather than accept that result, Wheeler shepVietnam War. It seems a good time to reflect upon his ca- herded a timely infusion of American forces that precluded the collapse. The American buildup continued with more reer and his legacy. than 180,000 in 1965, 385,000 Gen. Wheeler graduated in 1966, 485,000 in 1967 and from the U.S. Military Acad536,000 in 1968. American emy in 1932 and was commisforces performed well, and sioned as an Infantry officer. their logistical support proved After four years at Fort Bento be exceptional. Facing an ning, Ga., he served with unconventional adversary, they the 15th Infantry Regiment in developed doctrine to match Tientsin, China, and then with their circumstances and redethe same regiment in Fort signed advisory training sysLewis, Wash. He taught at the tems to accommodate advisory U.S. Military Academy during demands on an order of magni1940–41. During the early tude greater than previous preyears of World War II, demoncedent. Gen. Wheeler transstrated staff excellence tied formed the force while at war, him into training assignments fully integrating the helicopter in the United States. He deand other modern technology ployed as chief of staff of the in the face of the enemy. When 63rd Infantry Division in NoPresident Richard M. Nixon revember 1944. The 63rd Inplaced President Johnson and fantry Division landed in Maremphasized Vietnamization to seilles, moved to Willerwald, reverse Americanization, Gen. crossed the Saar River, mopped Wheeler methodically reversed up the Muhlen Woods and the flow of American forces fought bitter battles to seize while accelerating programs to Gudingen, breach the Siegfried Gen. Earle G. Wheeler develop the South Vietnamese Line, force the Rhine and capmilitary. Ultimately, the South ture Heidelberg. It pushed on through the Hardthauser Woods and Schwabisch Hall to Vietnamese Army performed capably at the battalion level and below, although it never became independent of force the Danube River before the war ended. Following World War II, Gen. Wheeler served in the Field American logistical and air support, and its politico-miliArtillery School, in occupied Germany’s U.S. Constabulary tary leadership left much to be desired. Gen. Wheeler’s most perplexing task was sustaining and in various staff positions within NATO and on the Army Staff. He took command of the 2nd Armored Divi- force quality in the absence of National Guard and Orgasion in Fort Hood, Texas, in 1958, and of the III Corps in nized Reserve participation, assets President Johnson 1959. He was named director of the Joint Staff in 1960, firmly denied the Joint Chiefs despite urgent objections. deputy commander of U.S. forces in Europe in March 1962 The mobilization base had to be redesigned, and draftees and Chief of Staff of the Army in October of the same year. pushed through it in numbers sufficient to fight the war He became Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in July and meet worldwide demands while compensating for 1964, a month before Congress surrendered its war-making those voluntarily serving but unavailable in the reserve powers to President Lyndon B. Johnson with the Gulf of components. Deferments complicated the issue with re70 ARMY ■ January 2008 National Archives Gen. Wheeler, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1964–1970, confers with President Lyndon B. Johnson at the White House in January 1968. spect to fairness, numbers and available talent. In the midst of war and sustained containment, the military also contended with massive domestic violence in the late 1960s. Hasty initiatives such as Operation Garden Plot generally got forces where they were needed. Fortuitously, reserve forces were made available for domestic contingencies. Again doctrine had to be rede-signed, and performances such as that of the 101st Airborne Division in Detroit became models for handling violence when the perpetrators are among one’s own countrymen. Under Gen. Wheeler’s steady hand, American units almost invariably sustained high standards of performance despite the obstacles that had emerged in fielding them. G en. Wheeler proved capable in managing flaps inside and outside of the services. Like Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, he presided over headstrong subordinates with prickly senses of prerogative—and without the benefit of the subsequent Goldwater-Nichols Act. His interventions with the services concerning the composition of the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam Headquarters enabled that agency to work, and he repeatedly smoothed the waters between Gen. William C. Westmoreland in Vietnam and ostensible superiors of naval provenance in Hawaii. Gen. Wheeler managed to downplay much that could have been damaging in the media. Cases in point include recriminations between the Army and the Marines after the Tet Offensive, and Gen. Westmoreland’s planning for the use of nuclear weapons around Khe Sanh. One piece of information he could not BRIG. GEN. JOHN S. BROWN, USA Ret., was chief of military history at the U.S. Army Center of Military History from December 1998 to October 2005. He commanded the 2nd Battalion, 66th Armor, in Iraq and Kuwait during the Gulf War and returned to Kuwait as commander of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, in 1995. He has a doctorate in history from Indiana University. much suppress was the post-Tet calculation that 206,000 more troops would be needed to finish the job. At some point, costs in blood and treasure would not be considered worth the stakes. It has become fashionable to accuse Gen. Wheeler and his colleagues of dereliction of duty for not revolting against their civilian masters. A response would depend in part on when one believes the war was lost, who knew for sure and the extent to which the loss was a military phenomenon. In A Better War: The Unexamined Victories and Final Tragedy of America’s Last Years in Vietnam, Lewis Sorley argues that the Vietnam War had been won by 1970—the year of Gen. Wheeler’s retirement—and America subsequently jettisoned the victory and abandoned the effort. If true, Gen. Wheeler would have little to apologize for with respect to his watch. One might also ask whether it would have been better to abandon Vietnam in 1965 or 1975. By 1975 the Sino-Soviet alliance had visibly disintegrated, the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty and other constraints had softened the Soviet threat and the long-term validity of containment was reflecting itself in an increasingly prosperous West and restive East Bloc. In this new strategic context, Vietnam seemed less consequential as a domino. Finally, there is one’s take on the oath officers swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. A downside of hari-kari is that one only gets to commit it once. Until and unless the right moment comes, officers obey the lawful orders of those appointed over them. In Earle G. Wheeler we find a soldier who had been dealt a bad hand, but nevertheless believed results would be better if he stayed at his post than if he left it. His example remains relevant today. ✭ Recommended Reading: Cosmas, Graham A., MACV: The Joint Command in the Years of Escalation 1962-1967 (Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History, 2006) Hammond, William M., Reporting Vietnam: Media & Military at War (Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1998) Sorley, Lewis, A Better War: The Unexamined Victories and Final Tragedy of America’s Last Years in Vietnam (New York: Harcourt, 1999) January 2008 ■ ARMY 71
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz