TEEB follow-up activities in the EU Bonn, 15 July 2013 Strahil Christov European Commission, DG Environment, Unit B2 (Biodiversity) Contents • TEEB Phase III, National Implementation Project and EUChina Cooperation • Brief overview of TEEB in the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 • Other Actions in the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 • • • • MAES Restoration and Prioritization Framework Green Infrastructure No Net Loss TEEB phases I and II: final reports for different audiences Ecological and economic foundations D0 Report for Policy Makers D1 Report for Local Policy Makers D2 Report for Business D3 TEEB for Citizens (website) D4 www.teebweb.org TEEB phase III • Focus on communication and outreach activities: • • Support national and sectoral studies inspired by TEEB reports; Maintenance of TEEB network of experts • New governance structure: • • • Advisory board continues to guide TEEB implementation Co-ordination group – TEEB donors, TEEB office staff, TEEB scientific coordinators New board members from business, communications and civil society networks to enlarge TEEB's representation and expertise • EC still major donor: - Mainly through support of UNEP TEEB national implementation - Other relevant studies within the EU to implement the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 UNEP TEEB National Implementation Project • Funded under the EC’s 2011 ENRTP round as part of the EC-UNEP Strategic Cooperation Framework, with EUR 3 million financing from DG DEVCO • Aim to support the implementation of TEEB projects in 5 developing (diverse) countries including Liberia, Tanzania, Bhutan, Philippines and Ecuador • Technical support includes the compilation of a Guidance Manual (see slide) and Training for TEEB implementation at the national level • Each project will be implemented through the technical and logistical support of a host country institution, in close cooperation with national government ministries, and in cooperation with relevant UNEP divisions and regional offices and other national and international organizations • The project was launched at the CBD CoP11 together with the World Bank’s Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES) and UNDP’s Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN). 5 TEEB Guidance Manual • Manual provides both technical and operational guidance on how countries may conduct a TEEB Country Study • Outlines the various steps that may be taken to initiate and implement a country study, communicate its findings, and implement the recommendations of the study. • 4 sections in the manual 1. 2. 3. 4. What is a TEEB country study and why does it make sense to do one? (understand TEEB and reasons for doing a TCS, ID related processes) Scoping: How to set up the study? (thematic focus, scope, objectives, design process, get stakeholders) How to do the study? (Six Steps: 1) refine objectives, 2) ID relevant ES, 3) define needs and methods, 4) assess and value ES, 5) SWOT policy options, 6) review and report) What to do with the results? (stakeholder engagement, communicate findings, think beyond TCS) • Challenges of a TCS • • • Show added value of "TEEB approach" (gap analysis, feasibility study, economics vs. politics of ES and BD) Balance credibility, relevance, legitimacy (governance structure, open architecture, involving other ministries) Translate results into arguments for policy debates (impact of the ground) 6 UNEP, BfN EU-China cooperation on TEEB • TEEB project proposal for the EU-China Policy Dialogues Support Facility (PDSF) prepared by BfN and UNEP TEEB Office • Objectives: • • • Activities: • • • • • • Promotion of the national TEEB process in China and TEEB activities in Europe and exchange of experience. Establishing a strengthened policy, planning, regulatory and institutional framework leading to mainstreaming the values of nature into economic and social development planning at regional, national and local level. Deepen cooperation on BD protection, including on the valuation of ES, natural capital accounting and the development of economic instruments and IFMs for biodiversity; Improve understanding and stress importance of ecosystem value and service function and among key stakeholders Enhance priority attached to ecosystem conservation and sustainable use; Consolidate guidance and training for TEEB national and sub-national implementation; Provide technical support on biodiversity and ecosystem assessment, valuation and accounting for specific national-level TEEB projects; Deliverables: • Conferences (2), Workshops (2-3), Case studies (30 person months), Expert exchange (20 person), Training (2), final publication. 7 TEEB in the EU 2020 Biodiversity strategy • Rationale behind biodiversity strategy • 6 Sub-targets with some specific measures related to TEEB • Target 2 and related measures By 2020, ecosystem services are maintained and enhanced by establishing Green Infrastructure and restoring at least 15% of degraded ecosystems. MS with assistance of Commission, will map and assess state of Es/ES by 2014, value such services and integrate in Accounting and Reporting Systems by 2020 Green Infrastructure Strategy by 2012 to encourage investments in GI (and RPF) No Net Loss initiative by 2015 (through compensation and offsetting schemes) • Cross-cutting issues: • Financing • Involvement of the private sector Target 2 - Maintain and restore ecosystems and their services By 2020, ecosystems and their services are maintained and enhanced by establishing green infrastructure and restoring at least 15 % of degraded ecosystems. Action 5: Improve knowledge of ecosystems and their MESEU services in EU study Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES), TEEB inc. valuation & accounting. MAES Analytical Framework; Launch of 6 val/acc thematic pilots. study Action 6: Set priorities to restore and promote the use of GI Restoration Prioritisation Framework by 2014; RPF Past GI study GI Strategy adopted on 6 May 2013 studies MAES WG GI/RPF WG NNL WG Action 7: Ensure no net loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services BD Biodiversity proofing by 2014 proofing No net loss initiative by 2015 study NNL study Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services pilots MAES work Methodological work Data reuse Forestry Pilot Freshwater pilot Pilot 1: Nature data NCA pilot Grassland pilot Marine pilot Restoration Prioritisation Framework • • • • • RPF Working Group Restoration/degradation Baseline for comparison Options for the 15% target. The 4-level concept for restoration • • • • 1) fully restored, 2) abiotic/biotic factors largely in good condition, 3) abiotic factors in moderate condition at least one biotic in bad condition, 4) severe problems with at least one abiotic and biotic factor) • Link with other EU policies (H&BD, WFD and MSFD) • Next steps Green Infrastructure: What is it? • Green infrastructure is a strategically planned and delivered network of natural and semi-natural areas with other environmental features designed and managed to deliver a wide range of ecosystem services. It incorporates high quality green spaces in urban, peri-urban and rural areas, designed and managed as a multifunctional resource. • Contribution to Europe 2020 Strategy: promoting smart, sustainable and inclusive growth – supporting a shift towards a resource efficient, low-carbon, sustainable economy by investing in our natural capital. Spatial structure delivering nature benefits to people What is the GI Strategy about? • Contribution of GI to key policy areas: regional development, climate change, disaster prevention and resilience, agriculture, forestry, urban, water, and biodiversity protection and enhancement • Why EU action? Priorities at EU level: • • • • Promote the deployment of GI in main policy areas and their funding mechanisms (integrate into implementation + guidance, awareness raising, best practices) Improve knowledge base and promote innovation Better access to finance (including innovative mechanisms) EU-level GI projects: Assess opportunities for TEN-G • Staff Working Paper with technical information No Net Loss Working Group • Objectives: • • collect views from Member State representatives, stakeholders and experts on the way forward for the NNL initiative announced for 2015, within the mandate of the 2011 December Council conclusions support the European Commission in its preparation of a NNL initiative • Outputs: • • • Scope and objectives of initiative Operational principles, developed/adapted from BBOP principles Glossary of terms • Output documents will be published on DG ENV's website in the next few days Examples of Definitions • Mitigation Hierarchy: 1. Avoid or prevent negative impacts on the environment in general and biodiversity in particular; 2. Minimise and rehabilitate on-site effects of development if impacts cannot be avoided; and 3. Offset/compensation measures that are undertaken as a last resort (on or off-site) for the residual adverse impacts. • Offsets/compensation: 1. An offset programme explicitly aims to achieve no net loss (NNL) and preferably a net gain. 2. Compensation involves measures to compensate, make good or pay damages for loss of biodiversity caused by a project. However some of these measures may fall short of NNL. This could be the case for direct restoration options, but also for indirect measures such as financial payments. Thank you for your attention Key document links • EU Valuation Study - http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/ • MAES documents - http://biodiversity.europa.eu/ecosystem-assessments/european-level • GI Strategy - http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/ecosystems/index_en.htm EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 2050 Vision 2020 headline target 6 Targets: 1 2 Fully implement nature legislation Maintain & restore ecosystems & services 3 4 5 Increase contribution of agri. & forest. to biodiversity Achieve Maximum sustainable yield Combat Invasive Alien Species Actions / Monitoring 6 Help avert global biodiversity loss Scope and objectives • How broad should the initiative be? • How should the NNL Initiative relate to habitats and species protected under EU law? • Focus on avoidance of impacts, and on compensating for residual impacts • Focus on species and ecosystem losses, or also on losses of other ecosystem services? • What impacts should be addressed? • Application (or not) to the coastal and marine environment • Geographical scope – only within the EU, or worldwide? • Stage of application of NNL in the development process • Voluntary and mandatory approaches NNL Roadmap NNL Other initiatives 2012 - - 2013 - 3 Meetings of NNL WG and recommendations by mid-2013 - Study on NNL options/ workshop - Formal consultation process - Impact Assessment Steering Group (IASG) 2014 - Further Meetings of IASG on NNL 3 Meetings of NNL WG Habitat Banking study EIA review proposal Guidelines biodiversity and CC Green Infrastructure communication - Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and services - Restoration prioritisation framework - Biodiversity proofing methodology 2015 - Adoption of NNL initiative
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz