SPECIAL REPORT CARS April 20th 2013 Gloom and boom SPECIAL REPORT C ARS Gloom and boom The motor industry’s fortunes are increasingly divided, says Peter Collins. But in the right markets and with the right technologies, they look surprisingly bright ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to those quoted in the text, the author is particularly grateful for their help with this report to: Andrew Bergbaum, Giacomo Mori and Jens-Ulrich Wiese of AlixPartners; Philip Smith of Citigroup; the sta of the Ford Research and Innovation Centre; Ian Fletcher of IHS Automotive; Pete Harrison and Tim Nuthall of the European Climate Foundation; Stefano Re Fiorentin of the Fiat Research Centre; Davide Santo of Freescale Semiconductor; John Newman of McKinsey; and Max Warburton of Sanford C. Bernstein. The Economist April 20th 2013 A HUNDRED YEARS ago Henry Ford and his engineers perfected an idea whose time had come: the moving assembly line. By putting the car on a conveyor belt, they cut the time taken to assemble a Ford Model T from 12 hours and 30 minutes in 1913 to just one hour and 33 minutes the following year. That made the car a lot cheaper to build and opened up a mass market for it. By 1918 its list price was down to $450, or just over 5 months’ pay for the average American worker, against the equivalent of about a year and a half’s pay when the car was launched a decade earlier. Cars became a personal badge of status, and in time carmaking became a badge of national virility. But since the 1950s the automobile has come to be seen as dangerous, dirty and noisy. In response it has been ever more strictly regulated, which has imposed additional costs. After the nancial crisis the entire industry slumped spectacularly in many rich countries. Two of America’s big three carmakers, Chrysler and General Motors, went bankrupt and had to be bailed out by taxpayers. In Europe car sales last year were the lowest since 1995. The battery-driven cars that were supposed to solve the pollution problem have so far been an expensive op. The motor industry seems to be in dire straits. Yet this special report sees plenty to be optimistic about. Sales in Japan remain stagnant and in Europe they are unlikely to grow much in the next few years, but in America they are already beginning to bounce back, and in China and other emerging markets the current boom looks likely to continue for the foreseeable future. AlixPartners, a consultancy, forecasts that the worldwide market for cars and other light vehicles will expand from about 80m units a year now to 107m in 2020 (see chart 1, next page). In China, now the world’s biggest market for cars, annual sales are expected to rise from 19m last year to 31m in 2020 as car ownership spreads to the country’s vast interior. So over the next seven years a Europe-sized market will grow up in China’s hinterland. Over the past decade tens of millions of Chinese families have gained personal mobility on an undreamt-of scale while lots of new jobs have been created making, selling and servicing cars in China. But the Chinese government seems less concerned about that than about its failure to create strong national champions capable of taking on the foreign carmakers on their own turf. In future it may try harder to achieve this aim, which could deter foreign rms from continuing to invest in the country. A wiser course would be to acceptas Britain, and more recently Russia, have already donethat as long as the business is thriving and 1 CONTENT S 2 Markets and makers Running harder 4 Electric cars General Electric Motors 5 China Voting with their wallets 6 Propulsion systems The great powertrain race 7 Emissions Green wheels 10 Driverless cars Look, no hands 12 Luxury cars Dreams on wheels 13 Demand forecasts Distant peak car 14 Imagining the industry’s future The road to 2033 A list of sources is at Economist.com/specialreports An audio interview with the author is at Economist.com/audiovideo/ specialreports 1 SPE C IA L RE P OR T C ARS 2 generating lots of well-paid work, the nationality of a car fac- tory’s owners and the badges on the bonnets hardly matter. As ever more consumers in China and other emerging markets have the money to buy fancier cars, makers of upmarket and high-performance vehicles will benet. Mass-market carmakers will have a harder time: too many factories are being built, especially in big emerging markets, which will lead to intense competition and price-cutting. As the biggest, most ecient manufacturerssuch as Volkswagen and Toyotapull ahead, those in the second division may seek salvation in alliances. Consumer heaven As an investment, then, the motor industry has to be treated with caution. But its engineering and environmental credentials are improving all the time. A century after becoming a mass-market product, the car is still a long way from being a mature technology. Manufacturers and their suppliers are investing huge sums in a variety of improved propulsion systems and in new lightweight materials to meet regulators’ emissions targets. The current generation of models is already vastly cleaner than earlier ones, and emissions of carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, soot and other pollutants are set to fall much further. The smog that began to aict trac-choked California in the 1950s and is now obscuring the sky in Chinese cities will gradually clear. The day may come when environmentalists stop worrying so much about cars and turn their attention to other polluters. Consumers will be in heaven. Improved manufacturing systems will allow the bigger carmakers to o er an ever wider range of models, supplemented by a steady stream of niche products from new entrants. Fierce competition will keep prices down even as cars are packed with ever more technology that will make them more expensive to produce. More of them will drive themselves, park themselves and avoid collisions automatically. That should cut down on accidents and trac jams, reduce the stress associated with driving and provide personal mobility for the growing ranks of the elderly and disabled. 1 Pick your market Light-vehicle sales Japan and South Korea Units m North America 20 10 20 1995 2000 05 10 15* 0 10 1995 2000 05 0 Global: 20* 10 15* Greater China† 20* Rest of world 120 Western Europe 110 100 20 1995 2000 05 10 15* 10 90 0 80 20* 70 60 Greater China† 50 40 1995 2000 05 Source: AlixPartners 2 10 15* 20* 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 1995 2000 05 10 15* 20* *Forecast †Includes Hong Kong and Taiwan All the technology that will go into making cars cleaner will also make them far more fuel-ecient and more economical. For motorists with short, predictable daily drives, all-electric cars may prove adequate and, as batteries improve, increasingly coste ective. Others will be able to pick from a range of propulsion systems, including hybrid, natural gas and hydrogen as well as improved petrol or diesel engines, to suit their needs. Manufacturers are hoping that all this technology will help counteract a worrying trend they are beginning to observe in rich countries: that car ownership is becoming unfashionable. In cities car-sharing and short-term hiring is becoming more popular. Young urbanites are getting their driving licences later, but the numbers of drivers at the other end of the age spectrum is growing, which may compensate for that loss. Best of all, in emerging markets there is enough pent-up demand to keep the industry growing for many decades yet. But which makers, in which countries, will reap the benets? 7 Markets and makers Running harder Carmaking can still be highly protable, but manufacturers have to work at it FROM A CARMAKER’S point of view, the great thing about emerging markets is that they have so many people and so few cars. Carlos Ghosn, the boss of Renault-Nissan, a Franco-Japanese carmaking alliance, notes that whereas in western Europe the ratio of cars to people is one to two, in China it is still only one to 20 and in India one to 40. Even if these countries eventually settle at, say, just half the car-ownership levels in the rich world, the potential remains immense. A recent study of China’s motor industry by Sanford C. Bernstein, a research rm, found that even though some of the biggest, most congested cities are starting to restrict vehicle ownership, the government is obsessed with roadbuilding and in the rest of the country there is plenty of room for more cars. China’s new middle classes are clamouring for foreign luxury cars, which is translating into handsome prots for makers such as Germany’s BMW and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), a Britishbased rm now owned by India’s Tata Group. Russia will soon overtake Germany as Europe’s biggest car market. In India foreign carmakers have found it hard to make money, says Xavier Mosquet of the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), because the market is relatively small and dominated by two local rms, Maruti and Tata, along with South Korea’s Hyundai. But Ralf Speth, the boss of JLR, is convinced that given India’s huge population and its entrepreneurial spirit, one day it will become an attractive market. His rm has started assembling some models in Pune and is planning to build more there. Plenty of other populous countries are as yet undersupplied with cars. Manufacturers are already rushing to build factories in Turkey (with a population of 74m) and Indonesia (242m). Sub-Saharan Africa (875m, and rising fast) could be the next China, reckons Stephen Odell, Ford’s boss for the region. JLR, having started to assemble cars in China and India, is now looking at Brazil, and may even open an assembly line in Saudi Arabia. Renault-Nissan is su ering from surplus capacity in France but is taking a controlling stake in Russia’s AvtoVAZ and boosting its output in that country, as well as expanding its Dacia 1 The Economist April 20th 2013 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS 2 subsidiary in Romania and increasing production in Morocco, where it opened its second factory last year. But governments in emerging markets are making life increasingly hard for manufacturers from rich countries that want to cash in on this booming demand. China, for instance, has forced foreign carmakers to form joint ventures with its domestic rms to build vehicles there as the price of entering the world’s biggest market. More recently other big emerging countriesBrazil and Russia in particularhave introduced protectionist laws to compel foreign carmakers to build locally. Sergio Marchionne, the boss of the Fiat-Chrysler group, says his company opened a factory in Mexico in 2011 on the understanding that there would be free trade in cars with Brazil, but now quotas have been imposed in both directions. Likewise a few Chinese carmakers had begun to make inroads into Brazil with cheap models, only to see sales collapse as the government pushed up import taxes. Since carmaking creates large numbers of well-paid jobs, it is no wonder that governments want to see it done locally. But there is a risk that the increase in new capacity around the globe will outstrip the expected growth in car sales. Bernstein’s study of the Chinese motor industry reckons that carmakers based there are planning to increase capacity by 12m between now and 2016, but that sales may grow by only 4m over that period. Build, and they will come? Assembly plants are generally protable if they are running at more than 75% of capacity, based on two shifts a day. China’s are now happily humming along at an average capacity utilisation of 88%. But unless factory-building is curbed, Bernstein reckons, this may fall to a loss-making 63% by 2016. Stefano Aversa of AlixPartners agrees that signs of excess capacity are already visible in China. He also sees it emerging in Turkey, South America and South-East Asia. In his view, the world’s existing factories have more than enough capacity to supply the growth in the global market for the next ten years. The Economist April 20th 2013 The risk of excess capacity, and thus of erce price competition, is emerging at a time when carmakers are having to invest heavily in new technology. Fortunately they still have plenty of scope to cut costs by standardising both their platformsthe underpinnings onto which the rest of the car is assembledand other components under the bonnet that drivers do not see. One reason why Volkswagen has done so well in recent years is that it has taken such standardisation further than most. This has allowed it to o er a broader range of vehicles across its many brands. For example, the MQB platform it has recently launched will be shared by the rm’s agship VW Golf, the pricier Audi A3, the humbler Skoda Octavia and cars of other sizes. AlixPartners predicts that most of the growth in car sales in the coming years will come from such megaplatforms, each of which will underpin more than 1m cars of all sorts every year. Flexible production lines will be able to turn out cars to t every niche in the market, enabling makers to o er buyers mass customisation of vehicles. Cars are becoming more like smartphones: expensive to develop and market, and with some pricey parts, but cheap to assemble in their millions, with endless variations. The carmakers with most scope for protable mass customisation will be the largest ones, the 10m-plus club that will shape up in the next few years: Toyota, GM and VW, with Renault-Nissan and Hyundai in hot pursuit (see chart 2). Philip Watkins, an analyst at Citigroup, argues that thanks to the economies of scale the largest makers enjoy, they will also be able to o er buyers better credit and leasing deals. This will be an increasingly important factor in emerging markets like China: the rst wave of buyers has tended to pay cash, but in future many will need to borrow, as they do in Western markets. A few makers of expensive status symbols for the well-o , in particular BMW and JLR, should be able to get by on making cars in smaller quantities. But a squeezed middle, building moderate volumes mostly for the mass market, may have to club together to become more viable. Fiat-Chrysler, for instance, acknowledges that it needs to boost its annual sales of 4.3m to something like 6m in the short term and to strengthen its presence in booming Asian markets. Besides building new factories of its own in Asia, the company is entering joint ventures with two undersized Japanese makers, Mazda and Suzuki. But all four companies may have been put o seeking closer ties by previous unsuccessful alliances: Fiat The big end 2 World’s largest carmaking groups by sales* 2012, units m Toyota† 9.79 General Motors 9.13 Volkswagen 9.10 Renault-NissanAvtoVAZ 7.53 Hyundai-Kia 6.96 Ford 5.31 Fiat-Chrysler 4.30 Honda 3.78 PeugeotCitroën 3.06 Suzuki 2.69 *Of light vehicles. Includes Chinese joint ventures †Includes Daihatsu and Subaru Source: IHS Automotive 3 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS component makers, universities and government agencies. Circumstances are forcing them to work together like grown-ups, Peugeot-Citroën of France, struggling for survival, has he says. struck a tentative deal to share platforms and engines with GM’s But none of this will save the industry from becoming more chronically loss-making European arm, Opel-Vauxhall. Daimler, fragmented: the sheer choice of new models coming onto the making good prots but still smarting from the failure of its mergmarket makes that inevitable. America’s big three makers face a er with Chrysler, is edging towards a closer relationship with the continued loss of market share on their home turf as South KoRenault-Nissan-AvtoVAZ alliance. Ford, too, having sold most of its premium brandsJLR, Volvo and Aston Martinnow nds itself in the uncomfortable middle, with annual sales of 5.3m. The sheer choice of new models coming onto the market But like VW it has made good progress on will inevitably make the industry more fragmented standardising platforms and parts; and having rebounded from the nancial crirea’s Hyundai and its aliate, Kia, expand and move upmarket sis without a state rescue, it is doing well enough for now to be and VW ramps up the output of a new factory in Tennessee. able to continue on its own. BMW is building up its British MINI brand, producing small but Since mergers and manufacturing alliances are so hard to expensive cars that draw customers who might otherwise have get right, carmakers are increasingly seeking more limited co-opbought a high-spec model from one of the mass-market makers. eration in their research e orts to share the costs of developing In rich countries new carmakers continue to enter the marexpensive new technologies. For instance, Ford is pooling its ket, often starting at the top end, making luxury and high-perforwork on hydrogen fuel cells with Renault-Nissan and Daimler, mance models, but with the potential to widen their range at a and BMW is co-operating with Toyota in this area. Ford’s chief later stage. Some, such as Tesla Motors (see box), are betting on technical ocer, Paul Mascarenas, says carmakers are having to replacing the internal-combustion engine with electric propul- 1 learn to work in partnership not just with their rivals but with 2 broke up with GM, Chrysler with Daimler and Mazda with Ford. General Electric Motors Tesla has high hopes for its high-spec electric cars FROM THE 1960s to the 1980s it was a General Motors plant. From then until 2010 it was used by GM and Toyota to make cars jointly. Now the giant carmaking factory at Fremont in Silicon Valley is in its third incarnation, as the manufacturing base of Tesla Motors, a maker of electric cars set up by Elon Musk, a founder of PayPal and of SpaceX, a rocketmaker. Mr Musk is a man of big ideas. His long-term aim is to help colonise Mars and die peacefully there. His entry into carmaking, an industry that has been the graveyard of many ambitions, is almost as bold. Mr Musk set up Tesla to hasten what he sees as the motor industry’s inevitable switch to battery power. Having started with expensive sports cars, to be followed next year by an equally upmarket sport-utility vehicle, the plan is eventually to move to more massmarket models and become a sort of General Electric Motors. Tesla’s current car, the Model S, with prices starting at $52,400, has won rave reviews. Electric motors produce maximum torque from a standing start, which can mean great performance. Tesla has many fans, especially among Californian techloving early adopters. They are vocal in rebutting the carmaker’s doubters, who are also not hard to nd. So far Tesla is using only a quarter of the Fremont plant’s vast area. This year it 4 plans to make just 20,000 cars as it concentrates on moving into prot. Mr Musk acquired the factory for $42m, far less than it would have cost to build, and bought lots of second-hand equipment. Tesla is doing a lot of things di erently from the mainstream carmakers. It produces many key parts in-house, from the battery packs to the slick touch-screen control panels. It is setting up a network of free fast-recharging points for its customers to top up their batteries on the road. It is battling America’s powerful car-dealership lobby so it can set up its own retail outlets. And it is aiming to get its products from the drawingboard to the assembly line at the speed of Silicon Valley tech rms rather than the statelier pace of Detroit’s car giants. Tesla’s manufacturing chief, Gilbert Passin, says the Model S moved from rst design to production in just over two years, something he reckons would take a traditional carmaker ve or six years. Working in Tesla’s favour is its lack of baggage of any kind. It has no internalcombustion technology to defend, and thus no problem in reaching regulators’ ever tighter targets for fuel eciency. It has no inherited pension and health-care liabilities and no auto workers’ union. In the past premium car brands have typically taken decades to establish themselves, but perhaps the millennial generation, used to seeing new smartphones rise and old ones fall, will be more open to start-up brands, especially ones from Silicon Valley. Much could yet go wrong. Any serious technical aw could prove fatal to a new rm with no older revenue-generating models to keep it going. Established carmakers could decide to ght Tesla head-onindeed BMW’s new i range of electric and hybrid cars seems to be aimed at similar buyers. In the longer term other technologies, such as biofuels, might develop faster than the electric battery. Whether Tesla ultimately succeeds or fails, it o ers some important lessons. As Mr Passin points out, if a small company like his can produce a new car so quickly and frugally, surely carmaking giants can become leaner too. Another lesson is that when surplus factories are closed, they can sometimes reopen. (Surplus workers too are sometimes recycled: Qoros, China’s new carmaker, hired a lot of skilled people from European manufacturers during the downturn.) Another lesson is that carmaking is still glamorous, and people with Mr Musk’s talent and bank balance still want to get into it. If he fails, someone else will have another go. The Chinese rms that have been sning around Fisker, a struggling Californian maker of hybrid petrol-electric cars, show that start-up carmakers with interesting technology can nd willing nanciers. The Economist April 20th 2013 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS 2 sion. Others, notably Britain’s McLaren, are taking advantage of the advanced technology and branding they have built up through motor-racing. Some new entrants may possibly follow the example of Apple, which designs and markets products but gets them assembled by others. A few established carmakers, including BMW and Volkswagen’s Porsche sports-car division, already use contract manufacturers to build some niche models, as did Fisker, an American maker of hybrid-electric sports cars, which is now in trouble. Paul Sa o, a technology forecaster in Silicon Valley, reckons that since cars are increasingly becoming a set of electronic systems and software applications on wheels, someone may create an open-source operating system for cars that others can use, in the same way that Google created its Android system to help new entrants into the smartphone market. Many of the high-tech parts in a carfrom infra-red sensors to turbochargersare made by independent suppliers, which would be just as happy to sell them to a new entrant as to an established manufacturer. So a big retailer, say, might decide to sell own-label cars manufactured specially for it, as happens with clothes and groceries. The idea is not as new as it sounds. Between 1908 and 1912 Sears Roebuck sold motors under its own brand in its catalogue, built for it by a manufacturer in Chicago. 7 The Economist April 20th 2013 China Voting with their wallets Chinese car buyers overwhelmingly prefer foreign brands THE BIGGEST THREAT to the world’s established carmakers in recent years was expected to come from Chinese competitors (and from a few Indian ones with international ambitions), but so far it has not materialised. Under plans drawn up by the government in Beijing in 1994, two or three world-class Chinese makers should be going head-to-head with GM, Toyota and the rest by now, but this has not happened. As China’s domestic market has boomed, the local brands have become increasingly sidelined as consumers have bought foreign ones. Chinese car companies started o working with foreign joint-venture partners, which the Chinese government hoped would be quickly pushed aside as the domestic rms learned how to make cars to international standards. Instead, the local rms have remained utterly dependent on their foreign partners for everything from technical knowledge to marketing nous. As a former industry minister has put it, we are hooked on joint ventures like opium. As Bernstein’s study on the Chinese car market notes, the streets are full of American, European, Japanese and South Korean cars, mostly made in joint-venture factories in China, with the foreign partners raking o handsome royalties for the use of their brands and technology. The market share of Chinese brands has continued to slide, from about 30% in late 2009 to less than 26% by the end of 2012. China’s favourite car last year was the Ford Focus. The rest of the top ten was made up of four kinds of VW, three GMs and two Hyundais. If they were making their own cars, China’s largest rms would be approaching world scale (see chart 3, next page), but mostly they are producing foreign brands under the direction of their foreign partners. For their study, Bernstein’s analysts bought two fairly wellregarded Chinese carsa sedan from Geely and a Great Wall SUVand took them to Europe for road-testing and a teardown, with specialist engineers examining their build quality. Even though the Chinese rms seemed to have made some progress in areas such as bodywork, overall the cars were badly put together and not pleasant to drive. The study concluded that China is still ve to ten years from building cars to global standards without foreign help. A recent poll by McKinsey, a consultancy, found that Chinese car buyers thought the same. The Chinese makers are striving to catch up, but they are having to spend a lot of money on advice from foreign engineers and consultancies, sometimes o ering salaries of up to $500,000 a year to lure experts from abroad. At the same time they are skimping on basic research, which means they will become increasingly reliant on foreign carmakers or foreign component makers. Two Chinese companies that bought foreign rms with useful technologySAIC, which absorbed the remnants of Britain’s Rover Group, and Geely, which bought Volvo of Swedendo not seem to have much to show for their purchases yet. Its initial plan having opped, the Chinese government has recently been pressing foreign carmakers to create new jointventure brands with their local partners, in the hope of weaning the local rms o foreign technology and styling. But neither the foreign nor the Chinese makers seem enthusiastic about this, 1 5 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS 2 and the policy could just as easily entrench local rms’ depen- dence on the foreigners. Meanwhile, worsening air pollution in Chinese cities is prompting the government to impose strict Western-style limits on emissions. This is likely to increase the technology gap between the foreign rms (which have already done lots of work on low-emission cars for their home markets) and the local makers. Where is China’s GM? Some worry that the Chinese government will soon turn nasty, forcing the foreign carmakers to hand more technology to their Chinese partners and accept smaller royalties from the joint ventures. But BCG’s Xavier Mosquet reckons that eventually China will accept that it is better to have a strong foreignowned industry creating well-paid jobs than to prop up uncompetitive national champions. This policy change will not be announced, he predicts, but it will be noticeable. Even so, Western makers still expect at least a few competitive Chinese rivals to emerge one day: I worry about them all the time, says Fiat’s Mr Marchionne. And as they try desperately to regain local market share and to export their surplus production, they could trigger price wars at the mass-market end, eating into the foreign giants’ prots. China’s government has repeatedly talked about consolidating the 100-odd local carmakers, but many of them are owned or subsidised by powerful city and provincial governments, which are turning a deaf ear to such suggestions. New entrants keep popping up: at the Geneva motor show in March, Qoros, a Chinese start-up, caused a stir by exhibiting good-looking prototypes. The company is a joint venture between Chery, a private-sector Chinese carmaker, and Idan Ofer, an Israeli shipping magnate. It is building a factory in Changshu, a city near Shanghai, helped by the local government, which will have an initial capacity of 150,000. Qoros is planning to raise a total of $2.7 billion, with Mr Ofer taking a 50% equity stake. He insists that there is always space for a new brand and says that in his shipping business he is quite used to waiting for up to ten years to make a prot. But he probably knows that to succeed in the status-conscious Chinese market, he will rst have to sell at least some of his cars to the discerning Europeans who set the trends. 7 3 Not as big as they look Chinese car production, 2012, units m 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 4.48 7 SAIC Dongfeng FAW 2.66 4 4 Chang’an 4 BAIC 4 GAC 5 Brilliance 3 Great Wall 5 Chery 6 Geely 6 JAC 4 BYD Source: China Automotive Industry Yearbook, Sanford C. Bernstein 6 3.08 Technical capability rating* 3 *Out of ten, compared with Volkswagen Propulsion systems The great powertrain race Carmakers are hedging their bets on powering cars TWO WORDS HAVE proved deadly for the mass-market electric car: range anxiety. Petrol or diesel cars can go for up to 1,000km on one tank but most battery-powered ones need recharging after 150-200kmunless you have $72,400 to spare for the extended-range version of Tesla’s Model S, a high-performance electric sports car that can do about 420km on one charge. Even for cheaper, shorter-range models the batteries can add perhaps $15,000 to the cost of the car. Running it will be delightfully cheap, almost in the category of small change, but at current prices the extra cost of the batteries far outweighs these savings. Moreover, the batteries’ range degrades over time. Recharging points are few and far between, and topping up batteries is slow. Tesla’s fast-charging stations still take half an hour to give the car another 150 miles (240km) of range. Political leaders such as Germany’s Angela Merkel who unwisely set grand targets for getting electric cars on their roads (she proposed 1m by 2020) are now regretting it. Carmakers too: last year Nissan’s Leaf electric car got less than halfway to its modest sales target of 20,000 in America. Its factory in Tennessee can turn out 150,000 a year. In any case, all-electric cars are green only if the electricity to recharge them is generated in low-carbon ways. Bernstein reckons that in nuclear-powered France the electricity to drive a battery car one kilometre causes carbon-dioxide emissions of just 8g. Yet in China and India, which generate much of their electricity from coal, those emissions are over 120g, so it would be greener to drive a new petrol-engined car instead. All sorts of industries are pumping money into making batteries more ecient and cheaper, but there are no breakthroughs round the corner. Larry Nitz, a senior engineer at GM, says the best use for a battery car may be as a household’s second vehicle, for short and predictable commutes or school runs. Light delivery vans are another potentially strong market. Given that carmakers are facing much tighter constraints on emissions (see box, next page), they are having to hedge their bets on a variety of propulsion systems (powertrains, in the jargon) in the hope that some combination of these will get them to the regulators’ targets. For the moment none looks like an outright winner. Their favourites are still the good old petrol and diesel engines, which remain capable of further improvement. Next on the list are various types of hybridscars with an internal-combustion engine that also run on batteries at least some of the time. The fuel cell, which turns hydrogen gas into electricity and water (and thus has no nasty emissions) has recently made a comeback, having previously been shelved as too costly. And the discovery of huge new gas reserves in America and elsewhere has boosted interest in fairly clean vehicles that run on compressed or liqueed natural gas (CNG or LNG). Horses for courses So the motor industry is revisiting its earliest days, when pioneers were trying out a variety of powertrains, including the steam engine, various liquid fuels and indeed battery power: among the exhibits at the Henry Ford Museum near Detroit is a 1934 map of Manhattan showing 38 recharging stations for the 1 The Economist April 20th 2013 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS Green wheels Once seen as environmental villains, cars are becoming squeaky clean BY THE 1950s trac in California had become so heavy that anti-smog demonstrators took to the streets. China’s cities have now reached a similar stage, minus the street protests, and local and national governments are increasingly following American and European regulators in imposing limits on emissions by new cars of nitrogen oxides (NOX), hydrocarbons and ne soot particles. China is also getting more concerned about global warming and pollution, and has started to require manufacturers steadily to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of the vehicles they make. Cars the world over will become appreciably cleaner in the coming years. The European Union is the strictest master. Under its Euro 6 standards, due to come into force next year, diesel cars’ NOX emissions will have to be 84% below the limits set when it started regulating them in 2000, and their soot output must be 96% below the initial limits set in 1992. Earlier this year Beijing, in response to an episode of appalling air pollution, introduced new limits similar to the current EU ones, which it plans to tighten further in 2016. The EU is also leading the way in cutting CO2 emissions, ahead of Japan, China and America (see chart 4). Carmakers know full well that they will have to keep investing heavily in low-carbon technology. Average CO2 emissions are due to come down from 130g per km now to 95g per km in 2020, and plans are already being drawn up for even tougher limits in 2025, of perhaps 70g. Bosch, a maker of sophisticated fuel-injection systems and other eciency-boosting devices, has argued that such strict limits are perfectly achievable with petrol and diesel engines, even before looking to hybrids and other low-carbon powertrains. Yet however ambitious the limits on new cars, most of the pollution and planetwarming gases come from older models. Michel Gardel, a spokesman on environmental a airs at Toyota, says that in France 80% of the pollution from diesel vehicles comes from 20% of the country’s diesel eet, especially those made before 2000. Another round of cash for clunkers subsidies for trading in smoky old bangers would help clear the roads, but governments in most countries do not have any money for such largesse just now. Some carmakers try harder than others to be green. At the Geneva motor show in March Volkswagen unveiled the XL1, an aerodynamically shaped plug-in hybrid with CO2 emissions of just 21g per km which will go into production, albeit in small quantities. In a study last year by Interbrand of the world’s greenest brands, as measured by both performance and public perception, three of the top four were carmakers: Toyota (rst), Honda (third) and VW (fourth). The odd one out was Johnson & Johnson, a medical rm, which came second. Besides making their models cleaner to run, many carmakers are also trying to 2 electric cars of those days. Henry Ford himself backed the right horse for his horseless carriages: the internal-combustion engine, burning petrol or diesel, which eventually all but wiped out its rivals. Conventionally fuelled cars have been getting more ecient for decades: a study by Michael Sivak of the University of Michigan found that between 1970 and 2010 the average fuel economy of America’s car eet improved by 66%. Now money is being poured into making it even better. A recent survey by KPMG found that in big emerging markets especially, the motor industry was switching its research funds back to the internal-combustion engine. Car engines are continuing to shrink, but are now being tted with things like turbochargers and fuel-injection systems that used to be available only on more expensive models. This means they cost more to make but achieve better mileage without loss of performance. Other fuel-saving gadgets include start-stop, in which the engine cuts out during idling, and various means of storing the energy released by braking. Hybrid cars, like pure battery ones, have been slow to catch on, though Toyota, the pioneer in mass-market hybrids with its Prius model, last year sold 1.2m such cars worldwide. Sales of The Economist April 20th 2013 4 An ever tighter squeeze Vehicle CO2 targets, g/km United States China European Union Japan 250 200 150 100 50 0 2010 2015 2020 Source: International Council on Clean Transportation reduce the environmental impact of manufacturing them. Toyota has drastically cut the amount of rubbish its American factories send to landll and Ford recently announced plans to do likewise. Ford is also working on replacing plastic parts and foam seat-stu ing made from petrochemicals with alternatives made from plant materials. Having been depicted as environmental villains since the 1950s, cars and their makers may soon be able to move out of the spotlight. Cars have cleaned up their energy-usage act a lot, says John Leech of KPMG, a consultancy, and there will be a lot more talk and focus over the next ve years about houses and industryðrather than cars not being very green. GM’s Volt hybrid have so far been disappointing but the carmaker is sticking with it, hoping that consumers will get used to the technology. A study by GM of Volt users’ driving patterns found that the average driver uses battery power 82% of the time, with a single overnight recharge, even though the battery’s range is only about 38 miles. So GM will probably keep the Volt’s range about the same as batteries become more ecient, says Mr Nitz, but will reduce the size of the battery pack to bring the sale price of the Volt closer to that of a petrol-only car. So it will remain a hybrid, not evolve into an all-battery car. Such improvements will get carmakers most, but not all, the way to meeting the tough emissions standards likely to be in place in the mid-2020s, so some are taking a fresh look at fuel-cell technology. Many have produced low-volume demonstration models, but Toyota plans to bring a mass-produced fuel-cell car to market in 2015. Didier Leroy, the carmaker’s European boss, explains that what should make fuel-cell cars attractive to motorists is that they can be topped up as quickly as a petrol car, and travel almost as far between rells. Their main drawbacks include cost (even higher than for battery-powered cars) and the need to set up a network of hydro- 1 7 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS 2 gen lling stations. In some countries, including Japan, China, South Korea and Germany, governments are pushing for such infrastructure to be built, so the take-up of fuel-cell cars may vary greatly between countries. In places with lots of windmills or hydro-electric dams, hydrogen could be produced by electrolysing water when demand for electricity is low, so fuel-cell cars could form part of a broader renewable-energy strategy. An alternative (which VW’s Audi division is about to try) is to use hydrogen made by wind turbines to soak up some of the CO2 spewed out by industry or coal-red power stations. The two gases are combined to make methane, chemically the same as natural gas extracted from the ground, so Audi’s biomethane can simply be pumped into the regular gas supply. When run on biomethane, the company’s new CNG cars will have e ective CO2 emissions of just 30g per km, less than a third of the EU’s target for 2020. More immediately, the abundant new supplies of cheap natural gas coming onto the market in many countries, mostly thanks to shale-bed fracking, have prompted much interest in running cars on CNG and heavier vehicles on LNG. Fiat-Chrysler is especially keen: all its Fiat-branded cars now have a dual-fuel option, with engines capable of being switched between CNG and petrol. Daniele Chiari, a senior manager at the company, says that in Italy such cars can run for 700km on ¤22-worth ($29) of gas, when fuel for a petrol-only car would cost perhaps ¤65. But since there are still few places to ll up with gas, the cars’ small petrol tank is a useful back-up. CNG cars cost about the same to make as diesel cars, which means a bit more than petrol ones. They look set for rapid growth in America too: GE and Honeywell, two industrial giants, are working on cheap home-recharging kits so CNG-car owners can top up from their domestic gas supply. Melissa Stark, an energy expert at Accenture, a consultancy, says that the LNG relling facilities now being set up along America’s main roads to supply lorry eets could also, with a bit of extra equipment, supply CNG for cars. Since both CNG and LNG vehicles use adapted petrol and diesel engines, all the eciency improvements now being made to those engines will also benet gas-powered vehicles, Ms Stark notes. In the same way as renewable biomethane could increasingly take the place of fossil-fuel gas, the various liquid biofuels now being worked on could one day replace petrol and diesel. Since the making of such biofuels involves sucking CO2 out of the air, their net emissions will be low. Alcohol made from sugar cane By 2050 the world’s car eet is likely to be by a broad mix of powertrains has long helped power Brazil’s cars, but such fuel crops reduce the land available for growing food, so hopes are resting on biofuels produced from algae, yeast or bacteria that do not take up land. However, says Ms Stark, it will be at least a decade before such fuels can be produced economically and in quantity. Some think that the pure electric car will win out in the end, despite getting o to a poor start. Tesla’s Mr Musk argues that even if the perfect biofuel were invented, the most ecient way to use it would be to make electricity in power stations and use that to recharge battery cars. Renault-Nissan’s Mr Ghosn thinks that the sheer simplicity of battery-powered cars will ensure their eventual success once batteries become smaller, cheaper and more powerful. But none of this is going to happen quickly, so by 2050 the world’s car eet is likely to be propelled by a broad mix of pow8 ertrains (see chart 5, next page). Countries with lots of natural gas may have more CNG cars; others may have built enough hydrogen relling stations to give fuel-cell cars critical mass; and so on. Jim Buczkowski, a senior engineer at Ford, sees this as an advantage: motorists will be able to select the powertrain of choice that best matches their needs. Many of the most sophisticated parts needed for di erent kinds of advanced powertrains are not made by carmakers but by a select band of high-tech suppliers, including Bosch and Continental of Germany and Denso and Panasonic of Japan. Such suppliers will enjoy growing pricing power, says Philip Watkins of Citigroup, even propelled as suppliers of low-tech parts will continue to be squeezed by the carmakers. In China, foreign parts-makers do not have to share their prots with their local jointventure partners in the way foreign carmakers do, and Chinese parts-makers do not yet seem capable of matching the best Western and Japanese technology, so high-tech suppliers appear to have a bright future. Another way of making cars cleaner and more fuel-ecient is to make them lighter. When JLR launched a new version of its Range Rover last year, it replaced most of its steel bodywork and frame with an aluminium shell, or monocoque, cutting the vehicle’s weight by 40%. Studies suggest that lighter materials combined with better aerodynamics could potentially double cars’ fuel eciencyand make them more enjoyable to drive. Again, di erent manufacturers are pursuing di erent ways of reducing their cars’ weight. JLR is backing aluminium, BMW is keener on carbon-bre composites and Hyundai is working on replacing ordinary steel with smaller quantities of advanced 1 The Economist April 20th 2013 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS 2 high-strength steel. According to AlixPartners, the proportion of conventional steel in a typical car will fall from two-thirds today to about one-fth in the future. The rest will be replaced by new materials, which are costly, so they are appearing rst on premium-priced models. Carbon-bre parts have the most potential to cut weight, but they are harder to recycle than steel and more time-consuming to make. McKinsey reckons that the material, although touted for decades, will be ready for the mass market only when the time taken to bake parts comes down from 10-12 minutes now to 1-2 minutes. The winners in this race for better powertrains and lighter materials will be innovators, and indeed a study by Thomson Reuters, an information provider, has noted a surge in car-related patents being led. Patents related to alternative-powered vehicles (hybrids, fuel cells and the like) almost trebled between 2006 and 2011. Toyota was the most active patent-ler in this area. The top ten also included Honda, GM, Daimler, Hyundai, Nissan, three Japanese parts-makers (Denso, Panasonic and Sanyo) and one German one (Bosch). A patent underperformance Perhaps oddly, the Chinese do not seem to be investing heavily to catch up. The Bernstein study found that even the biggest local rms were skimping on research and development. The world’s three biggest makersToyota, GM and VWeach have R&D budgets of $8 billion-10 billion a year, whereas the big Chinese rms Bernstein studied are at best spending a few hundred million dollars each. Since both China and India are churning out vast quantities of engineering graduates, the world’s largest carmakers had been expected to shift much of their R&D there. But this has not hapThe Economist April 20th 2013 pened, says Mr Mosquet of BCG: the most innovative carmakers seem to be those that keep most fundamental research at home, as Toyota, VW and Hyundai are doing, farming out only fairly peripheral work to labs in emerging markets. Bernstein’s study notes that, despite all those home-grown engineers, the Chinese carmakers are spending small fortunes hiring European ones. The domestic sort, says the study, mostly seem unable to do the kind of reverse engineering that allowed Japanese and Korean carmakers to catch up with the West. And the best ones are snapped up by the foreign carmakers in China, which can o er much higher pay. So all this new technology is giving the strongest of the rich world’s carmakers a breathing-space from new competition. But it will not come cheap, and they will need to pass the expense on to their customers. Hans-Werner Kaas of McKinsey says the average cost of making a car in America looks likely to rise by about $2,500 by 2020, which will be only partly o set by standardisation of platforms and parts. A study by Cambridge Econometrics and Ricardo-AEA suggested that the cost of di erent powertrains will converge somewhat, but even in 2030 fuel-cell, allelectric and plug-in hybrid cars will be a lot more expensive to make than those with improved internal-combustion engines. However, allowing for lower fuel bills, by 2020 the total cost of ownership for petrol, diesel, hybrid and battery cars (although not for fuel-cell ones) will be lower than the total cost for petrol cars now. Meanwhile the reduction in fuel costs, and the motor industry’s investment in the technology to achieve it, will create more than 350,000 new jobs in the EU by 2030, the study suggested. American consumers have got used to car prices remaining at in real terms over the past decade, and in Europe price wars are actually bringing prices down. In the words of Fiat-Chrysler’s Mr Marchionne, that means the ability to pass the technology costs on to the consumer is incredibly limited. That is why even the most protable and fast-growing carmakers are quietly telling analysts not to be too bullish. 7 5 Spoilt for choice Light-vehicle sales by technology type, units m 200 F O R E C A S T H2 fuel cell Electricity Plug-in hybrid Hybrid CNG/LPG Conventional diesel Conventional petrol 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 2000 05 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Source: International Energy Agency 9 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS Driverless cars Look, no hands One day every car may come with an invisible chau eur DRIVING THROUGH SILICON VALLEY on freeway 101 in busy Friday lunchtime trac, Google’s Chris Urmson icks a switch on the steering wheel. A green light comes on to tell him and your correspondent in the passenger seat that the Lexus SUV is now driving itself. A Jeep cuts across it, brakes and exits to the right, followed by a Toyota pickup truck that gets rather close. Each time the Lexus backs o smoothly, maintaining a sensible distance, then accelerates again once the road ahead is clear. Google rst revealed in 2010 that it had been working on self-driving cars. This ts in with its work on mapping and software and might give users extra time to surf the web, boosting Google’s prots. Last year the company released a video of a blind man sitting in the driver’s seat of one of these (albeit with a passenger as backup), being taken to buy takeaway tacos and collect his dry cleaning. Sergey Brin, one of the internet company’s founders, expects its autonomous driving system to be ready for the market in ve years. That may be optimistic, but by the 2020s some cars that drive themselves most or all of the time could well be in volume production. This will have big consequences. The idea of self-driving cars as a means of reducing accidents and congestion has been around for a long time. One of the most popular exhibits at the 1939 New York World’s Fair was Futurama, a depiction of a city with cars remotely controlled by radio. In the 1980s and 1990s the European Commission sponsored a programme of research on automated driving, Prometheus. In the mid-2000s the Pentagon’s research agency, DARPA, launched its Grand Challenges, o ering prizes to driverless cars that did best at navigating a tricky course. In the rst of these, in 2004, none of the robot cars completed the course. In the third, held in 2007, six cars made it. The winning team’s technical director was Mr Urmson. Its main advantage over its rivals was that it had mapped the course in ne detail, something that his current employers are busy doing for the rest of the planet. But even before such prototypes have proved themselves, the technology is already arriving in instalments as carmakers introduce sophisticated assisted driving features as options, even on mass-market models. European buyers of the Ford Fo- accident. Insurers have already begun to o er discounts to motorists who agree to have more sophisticated ones that monitor their driving all the time. Basil Enan, the boss of CoverHound, an online insurance broker, says that as well as giving discounts to drivers who install black boxes, insurers are o ering lower premiums on cars with assisted-driving features because they reduce accidents. He thinks that in future manual driving will increasingly be penalised: The more miles you’re logging on autopilot, the less you’re going to pay. This will give motorists an incentive to use the assisted-driving features on their cars. Carmakers, for their part, will have an incentive to keep adding more to maintain high scores in the widely publicised safety tests that help them sell their models. Safety-enhancing gadgets on cars tend to start out as optional extras, then get incorporated into best practice standards promoted by independent bodies like Euro NCAP, and eventually are made compulsory. Ubiquitous black boxes in road vehicles will provide a mass of data likely to demonstrate the e ectiveness of automated-driving features, which will prompt calls to make them obligatory. Let car speak unto car With demand for advanced in-car navigation and entertainment systems growing, vehicles are becoming ever better connected. From next year cars sold by GM in the United States and Canada will come with fast 4G mobile broadband. Improved connections will also make it possible for cars to send hazard warnings to each other, to receive a constant stream of information on the trac and weather ahead and even to interact with signals as they approach junctions. In Ann Arbor, near Detroit, 2,800 cars, lorries and buses have been tted with devices to send and receive such alerts. Some have just a simple beacon that informs other trac of their location, speed and direction. Others have more elaborate kit that can detect, for example, if another wired-up car, out of sight around the next bend, has slammed on its brakes. Carmakers are keen to support such research. Ford has provided eight sedans for this experiment and is using them to try out various ways of alerting drivers: sounds, warning lights, even projections onto the windscreens using a head-up display. Jim Sayer, who is overseeing the trial, says drivers seem interested too: when his team went to local schools and a hospital looking for volunteers to have their cars wired up, they got far more than they needed. In the Ann Arbor study it is human drivers who receive and act on the alerts, but in future cars will be able to respond automatically. Governments will want to ensure that all road trac gets connected up to reduce accidents, congestion and vehicle theft. Having a Decades of road-safety legislation will have to be transmitting beacon on every car would also be good for dynamic road pricing, overturned before cars can roam the streets without a with charges depending on the type of vequalied and sober driver at the controls hicle and the time of day. Brazil’s government is already preparing legislation that cus, a mid-sized car, can now leave it to drive itself and maintain will require all cars to have a beacon broadcasting their make, a safe distance in steady trac. The car can measure a parking model, registration number, age, fuel and engine power. space and steer itself into it. It reads road signs and admonishes So it seems clear that driving will become increasingly the driver if he breaks the speed limit. Such gadgetry also inautomated in the next ve to ten years. But will cars get to the creasingly makes decisions on the driver’s behalf and overrules point where they do not need a driver at all? Some carmakers are him in an emergency, for instance, braking to avoid a crash. sceptical. Jürgen Leohold, VW’s research chief, says perhaps in Other technologies are beginning to make this easier. First, 50 years, but he does not look further ahead than 20 years and the mechanical links between the controls and the working does not expect a fully autonomous car by then. He thinks over parts are progressively being replaced by electronic ones. Secthat timescale there will always be situations where the computond, cars now have a rudimentary version of black box data er will have to pass the controls to a human. Mr Leech of KPMG recorders to collect information on the moments just before an reckons that fully autonomous cars would still crash sometimes, 1 10 The Economist April 20th 2013 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS 2 so manufacturers might be reluctant to market them for fear of damaging their reputation. But Renault-Nissan’s boss, Carlos Ghosn, is more optimistic: I don’t see any impossible obstacle. I think this is something you are going to see on the horizon of 2020 because the technologies are getting mature. A number of technical obstacles remain. For driverless cars to work, every inch of road, every junction, road sign and signal everywhere will have to be mapped in perfect detail. But this is being done anyway to support navigation systems for both cars and smartphones. Mr Urmson says that self-driving software will gain experience as it is tested, just like a human driver. The di erence is that everything it learns will become available to every other car with the same software. Google’s driverless cars have already clocked up more than 700,000km, which Mr Urmson reckons is more than he will drive in his lifetime. Computers do not get tired or distracted and will be far more aware of their surroundings than any human. In a tricky situation, says Mr Urmson, the computer will do what a human would: brake hard and hope for the best, but do so more quickly and expertly. The technology seems likely to be ready before all the questions of regulation and liability have been sorted out. Three American states, Nevada, California and Florida, have passed laws governing the testing of driverless cars on public roads, which had previously been a legal grey area. But that is just the The Economist April 20th 2013 start. Decades of road-safety legislation will have to be overturned before cars can roam the streets without a qualied and sober driver at the controls, and accidents involving driverless cars are bound to attract some lawsuits. A study in 2009 of the legal risks of increasingly autonomous cars by the RAND Corporation, a research body, suggested two possible solutions: changing the liability laws to require courts to take the benets of driverless technology into account when punishing carmakers for any failings; and limiting motorists’ ability to sue in state courts when driverless technology mandated by federal laws fails to prevent an accident. By way of a precedent, the study noted that some states already have laws forbidding drivers from going to court over minor accidents, requiring them to claim on their insurance policies instead. Mr Urmson notes another precedent: the 1929 Warsaw Convention limiting airlines’ liability to passengers in the event of loss and injury, which was introduced in an e ort to give air travel a lift. But Dave Cole of the Centre for Automotive Research in Michigan fears that given America’s taste for litigation, the truly driverless car will probably emerge somewhere else rst. Alex Padilla, a member of California’s state Senate who promoted the law on testing driverless vehicles, is condent that most people will want it (though there will always be some who enjoy the sport of doing their own driving). It will bring huge benets. People who spend hours driving every day will get a chunk of their life back, to work, rest or play while they are on the road. Less congestion means less wasted fuel and fewer emissions. Volvo has already demonstrated a way of packing autonomous cars together in road trains, greatly increasing the capacity of roads while reducing trac jams. The aerodynamic e ects of road trains o er scope for even greater environmental gains: a 1995 study by the University of Southern California showed that they can improve fuel eciency by up to 30%. Google’s stunt with the blind man points to another big advantage of the driverless car: it can provide mobility for the growing number of older and disabled people in the rich world and in some emerging markets too. Mr Ghosn points out that a baby born today might easily live to 100, but from the age of about 75 many people will su er health problems a ecting their ability to drive. Parents, too, will welcome a car that does the school run for them. And teenagers will no longer be put o getting their rst car by tough driving tests and steep insurance rates because they will need neither licences nor personal insurance. Business travellers may sleep in driverless Winnebagos that hurtle down the motorways at night, delivering them to the next morning’s meeting. Electronic guardian angels Most important of all, the driverless car will drastically reduce the carnage of road accidents and the colossal medical costs associated with them. A new study by the World Health Organisation shows that such accidents kill a shocking 1.24m people a year worldwide. McKinsey’s Mr Kaas says that in China and other countries where most motorists are fairly new to driving, safety features are an important selling point for cars. Cars on autopilot will also radically change the car-insurance business. Most of the cost of this is to cover liability for accidents, which will become rare, so revenues will come down a lot. Stricter speed limits, safer cars, seat belts and the like have already brought a steady decline in casualty rates since the 1960s, when Ralph Nader wrote his anti-car diatribe, Unsafe at Any Speed, but now there are signs that in America distracted drivingtexting, phoning and tweeting at the wheelis reversing the trend. If automated driving means more people are able to use cars, and more cars can safely be tted onto the same roads, that should be good for the motor industry. In time cars that have hard-1 11 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS 2 ly any accidents should also become cheaper to make, because they will not need to be so robust. But in the shorter term the carmakers will have to add lots of expensive sensors, computing power and software to their models, which will make it harder to turn a prot. Larry Burns, a former GM executive who now works on driverless cars and other transport issues, says the technology looks inevitable, but it is hard to see how it will deliver value for car companies’ shareholders. As car users do less driving and spend more time as passengers, they will also become less aware of how well a car performs, which is currently a big selling point. Stefano Aversa of AlixPartners worries that cars will become commoditised, rather like dishwashers. Makers may have to change their marketing to put more emphasis on styling, interior comfort and brand. Mr Ghosn thinks they will nd a way: What you market in a car is not about what you use but about what you dream. John Eddy of Arup Associates, a big rm of consulting engineers, says town planners, property developers and builders need to start thinking about the e ect of self-driving technology on demand for roads, parking, housing and so on. So far there is little sign that this is happening. But the driverless car is denitely on its way. 7 Luxury cars Dreams on wheels Why everyone wants to be in the top end of the market BRITAIN’S ECONOMY MAY be heading for a triple dip, but for posh British cars the recession has long been over. Sales of Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) last year were 30% up on the previous year. Over the past two years JLR has taken on 9,000 people, and has just decided to near-double the size of the engine factory it is building in the West Midlands. Rolls-Royce, which sold a record 3,575 of its ultra-luxury cars last year, is on a roll too. At the Geneva motor show it unveiled the new Wraith, a coupé for playboys with at least ¤245,000 ($320,000) to spare who want to leave the chau eur at home and do the driving themselves. Bentley, which launched a new Flying Spur limousine at the Geneva motor show, enjoyed sales growth of 24% last year. These days JLR is owned by India’s Tata Group, Rolls-Royce by BMW and Bentley by Volkswagen, but the cars’ appeal still relies on their quintessential Britishness. Similarly, the success of BMW, Mercedes and Audi cars rests on their German styling and precision engineering, both in rich countries and among the new wealthy of the emerging world. The contrast between the luxury end and the mass-market part of the European car business is striking. BMW has recently been making operating prots of about ¤4,000 ($5,200) on each car it sells whereas Opel-Vauxhall, the European arm of GM, has been losing about ¤1,500 12 per car. And the global boom in premium-priced cars looks likely to continue. One thing is for sure, says Rolls-Royce’s boss, Torsten Müller-Ötvös. You will see more rich people in the world. The group of ultra-high net worth individuals from which his customers are drawn is expected to grow by 3-5% a year in the years ahead. And in East Asia, where sales are growing fastest, it is more acceptableexpected, evento underline your success in life by conspicuous consumption. In a recent study of motor-industry executives from around the world by KPMG, those from rich countries said customers were scaling down to smaller, more ecient and greener models, whereas those from the BRIC countries reported that buyers wanted upmarket models. Even those who could not currently a ord these seemed to be looking forward to the day when they would. Tata’s super-cheap Nano has not sold well because India’s rst-time car buyers would rather wait than drive what they see as a poor man’s car. The feelgood factor A survey by McKinsey of Chinese consumers found that after an initial burst of if you’ve got it, aunt it, motives for buying foreign luxury brands were becoming more subtle. Some respondents saw having the right car as a visiting card with which to impress potential business partners. Many considered a fancy car a delightful self-indulgence rather than something to show o to others. Mr Müller-Ötvös sees the same trend among RollsRoyce buyers: they are less interested in exterior bling, more in interior comforts, like having the fur inside your coat. In China the market for luxury cars in the past decade has grown by an average of 36% a year, far outstripping the 26% annual rise in its overall car market. Even as growth slows down in the next few years, McKinsey expects the premium-car market to maintain a lead, expanding by an average of 12% a year to 2020, compared with around 8% for the car market as a whole. By then China will be the biggest market for luxury cars. Nor is it just Chinese buyers who are keen on status symbols on wheels. JLR’s sales chief, Phil Popham, says his company expects the global market for premium cars to increase by up to 45% over the next ten years. JLR is looking beyond the BRICs into the MIST: populous countries such as Mexico, Indonesia, South 1 One of RollsRoyce’s stories is that threequarters of the cars the company has ever produced are still on the road The Economist April 20th 2013 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS Distant peak car Carmakers worry that one day demand for cars will stop rising. But that is a long way o IN 1924 FORD ran an advertisement headlined His First Car, urging fathers to buy their teenage sons their rst set of wheels. The idea caught on. For boys especially, learning to drive became an essential part of growing up. By the late 1970s 86% of American 18-year-oldsof both sexeshad a driving licence. But then the trend went into reverse: researchers at the University of Michigan found that in 2010 only 61% of 18-year-old Americans had licences. Other rich countries are going the same way. Teenagers are showing less interest in cars as they turn their attention to smartphones and social networking. This is a worry for carmakers, who are wondering where their future customers are going to come from. In the two decades to 2008 the number of miles driven by Americans in their 20s fell by 8%. In Britain a study for the RAC Foundation, a transport-research body, found a 30% drop among men in the same age group between 1996 and 2006. One reason for concern is that half the world’s population now lives in towns and cities, which have only so much space for cars. Even in rapidly growing car markets such as China, city governments in the more prosperous parts of the country are beginning to restrict new car registrations and invest heavily in public transport. Young urban residents may also be meeting up less often in person, thanks to social-networking sites that let them keep in touch digitally. So they have less need for a car, and when they do need one they turn to car clubs, which o er rental by the hour in their neighbourhood, and to car-sharing schemes. In particular, the generation who came of age after 2000, the so-called millennials, express a preference for having access to rather than owning cars. But some of that may be just talk. In a survey by McKinsey, American millennials said they expected to use car clubs in the future, but when asked if owning a car would remain an important status symbol, they were much more likely to answer yes than older consumers. Economic factors, too, work against car ownership. Sheryl Connelly, Ford’s global trends and futuring manager, notes that a few decades ago teenagers in America often got free driving lessons at school, but now they may have to pay up to $800 for them before they can sit their test. The cost of adding a young driver to the family’s car-insurance policy too has risen sharply, she says. In Britain the RAC Foundation study found that fewer young men are driving because their employers have cut back on providing company cars. However, studies also show a marked rise in the proportion of elderly people with driving licences. Baby-boomers pretty much all learned to drive, and now that they are beginning to retire they expect to continue motoring. The development of assisted driving, followed one day by fully automated cars, will allow them to stay mobile for much longer. 2 Korea and Turkey, whose middle classes are also expanding. Its cars, especially its Range Rover sport-utility vehicle, have joined the elite group of Veblen goods, the sort that become more desirable as they get more expensive (named after Thorstein Veblen, a sociologist who invented the concept in 1899). The rst incarnation of the Range Rover in the 1970s was a rugged, utilitarian beast ideal for farmers. The latest version, with its sleek styling, plush interiors, high-tech aluminium frame and impressive performance, caters to a di erent kind of customer. Prices range from £71,000 ($109,000) to well over £100,000. The key to success in the luxury market, explains Mr Müller-Ötvös, is that customers want to be able to tell their friends, family and business associates some good stories about what they have bought. For a brand as steeped in history as Rolls-Royce, that is no problem. One of its stories is that threequarters of the cars the company has ever produced are still on the road: It is a smart investment, he says. McLaren, a successful British maker of sports cars, is drawing on its heritage as a Formula 1 racing team. Tesla’s Model S glories in being an advanced car made by a Silicon Valley start-up created by a tech billionaire. This lucrative market is hard to get into. Even Mercedes reThe Economist April 20th 2013 What may be happening in rich countries is a one-o shift in the timing of people’s driving careers, so that they start later but then continue well into old age. This may be no bad thing for carmakers. It has long been an open secret in the business that cars are advertised as being for the young but are bought mainly by the middle-aged with the necessary disposable income. In America the average Mercedes buyer is in his late 50s, and even the supposedly youth-oriented MINI Cooper is typically bought by people in their early 40s. The world’s biggest car markets China, North America and Europeare all greying. So it is not clear that declining car ownership among young urbanites will have more than a marginal e ect on overall car sales. Besides, argues Renault-Nissan’s Mr Ghosn, for most people their car is more than an object. For some it is an extension of their home, he says, and most people would rather not share their home. For others it is their pet, and who wants to share their pet? All in all, peak carthe point at which worldwide demand for cars will stop risingstill seems quite a long way o . In the rich world some of the economic factors that have deterred young people from taking up driving will fade away: as cars become increasingly self-piloting and accident rates fall, insurance costs should decrease, and in time there will be little or no need to take expensive lessons. cently failed in its attempt to revive Maybach, a pre-war ultraluxury brand. It took VW’s Audi three decades of steady improvements and skilful marketing to reach its current level of desirability. Japan’s three biggest carmakers have put a lot of e ort into creating premium brands of their ownToyota with Lexus, Nissan with Inniti and Honda with Acurabut have yet to catch up with Europe’s most prestigious marques. KPMG’s Mr Leech thinks they may do well with those Asian consumers on whom the ner points of German or British styling are lost, but McKinsey’s Mr Kaas is not so sure. Chinese consumers are developing Western tastes, he says, and value the long history and brand cachet of European luxury marques. Some of Europe’s struggling volume carmakers, such as Peugeot and Opel, are trying to move upmarket too in order to get back into the black. Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, is calling for a revival of Soviet-era luxury brands such as Zil and Chaika. China’s new carmaker, Qoros, may also be aiming to establish itself as a premium brand. Mr Kaas says they all need to hurry up. Although brand loyalty in emerging markets is less strong than in the West, tastes are maturing and new luxury brands will nd it ever harder to grab a share of the cake. 7 13 SPECIAL REPORT C ARS Imagining the industry’s future The road to 2033 How might carmaking look 20 years from now? THE PAST TWO decades have been an exciting time for the motor industry, but not always in a good way. The battle to achieve scale to survive in a global market produced victims as well as winners, and some of the resulting deals were better than others. Toyota’s absorption of Honda in 2027 went surprisingly well, though it cost a Japanese minister his job. VW’s merger with Tata Motors came as something of a surprise, but with hindsight it made sense: it allowed the combined company to claim the crown as the world’s biggest carmaker and take the lead in the booming South Asian market. Fiat-Chrysler’s alliance with Japan’s Suzuki and its Indian partner, Maruti, has proved rather unwieldy and is still not working smoothly. Hyundai-Kia has worked hard at pushing up its share of the market, having mopped up some casualties among Chinese carmakers. China now has its very own car giant, Zhongguo Tongyong Qiche (China General Motors), the majority-owned aliate of America’s GM that emerged from the messy break-up of joint ventures between Chinese and foreign carmakers in the early 2020s. China General Motors and China People’s Car (the country’s second car company, better known as China Volkswagen) have pleased the government by launching Chinese-branded and styled cars that are enjoying rising sales across Asia. In the euro zone years of painful restructuring are at last paying o , with GM’s Peugeot-Opel division enjoying a revival. But excess carmaking capacity almost everywhere means that nobody is making much money. Further consolidation looks likely, and not just among car companies. The recent takeover of Ford by IBM follows naturally from the carmaker’s argument that it should be seen primarily as a software and systems-integration rm. But IBM’s plan to sell Ford’s manufacturing operations to Magna, a big components-maker, has fallen through. By the late 2010s battery technology had got so much better that some carmakers lost interest in internal-combustion engines, but they had to think again. The opening up of the vast shale-gas elds across Asia made gas a much more attractive proposition. Since gas is much cleaner to burn than petrol or diesel, many carmakers were able to meet the 2020 targets for carbon- 14 dioxide emissions with relative Offer to readers ease by o ering natural-gas hyReprints of this special report are available. brids. And breakthroughs in the A minimum order of five copies is required. early 2020s in making methane Please contact: Jill Kaletha at Foster Printing gas and liquid fuels from bacteTel +00(1) 219 879 9144 e-mail: [email protected] ria and algae made the even stricter CO2 targets for 2025 Corporate offer much more attainable. Corporate orders of 100 copies or more are Some carmakers are still available. We also offer a customisation doggedly working away at hyservice. Please contact us to discuss your requirements. drogen fuel cells, but these are Tel +44 (0)20 7576 8148 competitive only in countries e-mail: [email protected] where the government has manFor more information on how to order special dated the provision of hydrogen reports, reprints or any copyright queries lling stations. Similarly, fully you may have, please contact: electric cars are predominant The Rights and Syndication Department only in countries that can pro20 Cabot Square London E14 4QW duce electricity cheaply, such as Tel +44 (0)20 7576 8148 nuclear-powered France. Fax +44 (0)20 7576 8492 The self-driving car took a e-mail: [email protected] temporary knock when the myswww.economist.com/rights terious hacking incident of 2023 Future special reports (which was never resolved) International banking May 11th caused a spate of crashes of cars Myanmar May 25th running on autopilot, leading to Germany June 15th a urry of liability suits. Even so, The Arab spring July 13th city governments in China Previous special reports and a list of pressed ahead with their ban on forthcoming ones can be found online: manual driving on busy arterial economist.com/specialreports roads to cut congestion and accidents. Now the practice is spreading to Western cities. The mayor of Toronto, Justin Bieber, recently pushed through a radical plan to ban all private cars in the city centre and replace all cabs with driverless taxis. Similar moves in California have prompted the creation of the Steering Wheel Club, which defends Americans’ right to drive. It is led by a former lobbyist for the National Rie Association. Licence not to kill Cars are now considered perfectly safe when piloting themselves in any situation. Even so, lawmakers in most countries have been slow to repeal the laws on driving tests and licences, and in most places the rules still call for at least one sober driver sitting in a front seat. But driving tests have been simplied now that there is no longer a need for manual manoeuvring into parking bays. The Silver Riders, a pressure group formed by octogenarian baby-boomers, is campaigning to scrap driving licences altogether so that elderly Americans can get around in their self-driving motors no matter what physical shape they are in. The campaign has now become generation-spanning, attracting support from many teenagers who want to skip driving lessons. Ubiquitous on-board systems for monitoring speed limits and other trac restrictions on every stretch of road have yielded some unexpected savings: highways authorities no longer have to maintain superuous trac signs. Britain’s Royal Automobile Club recently launched a nostalgia-fuelled drive to exhibit a representative collection of them in a new museum alongside Birmingham’s Spaghetti Junction. 7 The Economist April 20th 2013
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz