:
«
»,
1, 2015, .1
: 342.-3
. .,
:
,
. ’
,
,
.
’
,
,
.
:
,
,
,
.
. .,
:
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
:
.
,
,
,
.
Kyrylyuk I.V.,
ESSENCE OF APPELLATE TERM
IN ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL PROCEDURE OF UKRAINE
PhD student, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs
Summary: A substantial condition for effective execution of the right to appeal is compliance with terms of
appeal, violation of which leads to impossibility of appellate process itself. That is why appellate term must be
preserved, that means that a person during this term always has an opportunity to exercise his/her right to appeal.
The author of the article defines an appellate term as established by law time period during which a person
who considers decision of court of original jurisdiction illegal or/and unfounded has a right to lodge a compliant
to court of appeals instance and court must examine dispute under appeal in substance. The notion “appellate
term” has its generic meaning and includes such types of terms: term for filing appellate compliant, term for
actions of administrative court of original jurisdiction after acquiring appellate complaints, and term for
examination of appellate compliant by administrative court of appeals instance.
Appellate term should be sufficient to provide enough time for persons who participate in appellate
procedure to prepare for defense, to provide sufficient time for arrival to the court of appeals instance, to
guarantee timely protection of infringed rights. Appellate term also should correspond with social needs and
should not contradict European standards of human right and freedoms protection. Correct definition of such term
assuage civil society, guarantees that no erroneous decision will be put into effect, since there always exists time
for its correction. Increasing time for appeal should provide an opportunity for the subjects of appeal for proper
preparation of arguing their legal position in court of appeals instance. Increasing the time for appeal of
resolutions and decisions of administrative court of original jurisdiction to at least fifteen days should reduce a
number of motions for renewal of appellate terms.
Key words: petition of appeal, administrative justice, terms of appeal, right to appeal.
.
135
:
«
»,
1, 2015, .1
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
-
,
. .
. .
, . .
, . .
,
. .
,
,
. .
’
, . .
, . .
. .
,
. .
,
,
,
. .
.
.
,
.
,
,
’
,
,
.
,
.
–
,
,
,
[1, . 31].
[2, . 14].
,
.
,
[3, . 68].
. .
,
,
,
,
,
,
, –
,
[4, c. 214]
,
,
,
/
.
,
,
,
,
,
«
.
»
:
,
.
,
,
136
:
«
»,
1, 2015, .1
.
’
.
:
,
,
,
( . 188
–
).
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
.
.
. 160
.3
,
’
,
.
. 167
.4
,
,
’
’
( . 186
).
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
.
:
,
,
– 15
,
– 20
,
[5, . 75].
.
,
.
,
,
.
.6
(
)
. 188
,
,
.
137
:
«
»,
1, 2015, .1
,
.
.
,
/
,
.
’
.
’
,
.
’
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
;
;
.
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
(
),
(
(
–
–
),
),
.
,
–
,
,
’
(
)
5
(
,
).
–
,
( . 69, 294
).
,
,
’
(
–
138
,
,
:
«
»,
1, 2015, .1
,
–
).
.
. 395
.
.
,
,
. .
.
,
,
[6, . 35].
,
30
.
,
,
[5, . 10].
,
,
,
,
,
. .
,
[7, . 109].
,
,
.
,
.
.
,
,
.
’
.
,
.
’
.
.
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
.
:
1.
. .
:
/ . .
(40). – . 27–31.
139
//
. – 2012. –
5
:
«
2.
:
. .
. ...
. .
.
3.
. .
4.
.
.
. – 2003. –
. .
., 1968. – 396 c.
. .
.
5.
.
.: / . .
.–
., 2004. – 32 .
/
10 (28). – . 67–74.
/
. .
.–
:
.
:
. 12.00.15 «
.–
»/ . .
6.
2011. –
7.
1, 2015, .1
.
//
.
»,
. .
6. – . 34–37.
. .
.
.:
.
.
;
;
, 2005. – 190 .
/ . .
//
.–
:
.
:
. 12.00.03 / . .
;
, 2013. – 201 .
References:
1.
Diordicza I. V. Stroky` zvernennya do administraty`vnogo sudu: oglyad prakty`ky` zastosuvannya
procesual`ny`x norm na pry`kladi pershoyi ta apelyacijnoyi instancij / I. V. Diordicza // Advokat. – 2012. – # 5
(40). – S. 27–31.
2.
Isaeva E. V. Protsessualnyie sroki v grazhdanskom protsessualnom i arbitrazhnom protsessualnom prave:
avtoref. dis. ...kand. yurid. nauk.: / E. V. Isaeva. – M., 2004. – 32 s.
3.
Plevako V. I. Pravo na apelyacijne oskarzhennya rishen` gospodars`ky`x sudiv. Poryadok realizaciyi / V. I.
Plevako // Visny`k prokuratury`. – 2003. – # 10 (28). – S. 67–74.
4.
Perlov I. D. Kassatsionnoe proizvodstvo v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse / I. D. Perlov. – M. : Yurid. lit.,
1968. – 396 s.
5.
Karavaeva E. V. Voprosyi apellyatsionnogo proizvodstva v grazhdanskom protses se : dis. na soisk. uchen.
stepeni kand. yurid. nauk : spets. 12.00.15 «Grazhdanskoe pravo i protsess; semeynoe pravo; mezhdunarodnoe
chastnoe pravo» / E. V. Karavaeva. – Saratov, 2005. – 190 s.
6.
Osmanov T. S. Novaya apellyatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii / T. S. Osmanov // Rossiyskiy sudya. –
2011. – # 6. – S. 34–37.
7.
Batry`n O. V. Pravo apelyacijnogo oskarzhennya rishennya v cy`vil`nomu sudochy`nstvi Ukrayiny`: dy`s.
na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya kand. yury`d. nauk : specz. 12.00.03 / O. V. Batry`n; Xarkivs`ky`j nacional`ny`j
universy`tet vnutrishnix sprav. – Xarkiv, 2013. – 201 s.
.
.–
.
,
:
..
342.9
.
. .,
»
«
’
.
,
-
’
.
:
,
,
’
,
.
,
,
’
.
.
. .,
»
«
.
,
-
.
140