Transgenics, Vol. 4, pp. 121-135 Reprints available directly from the publisher Photocopying permitted by license only © 2004 Old City Publishing, Inc. Published by license under the OCP Science imprint, a member of the Old City Publishing Group. A Novel Gene Transmission Pattern of Exogenous DNA in Offspring Obtained After Testis-Mediated Gene Transfer (TMGT) M A S A H I R O S AT O a * , S H I N G O N A K A M U R A b , c a The Institute of Medical Sciences, Tokai University, Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan b Division of Nephrology and Metabolism, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan c Present address: Department of Surgery II, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-8513, Japan We have attempted to establish a new method, so-called "testis-mediated gene transfer, TMGT", based upon gene transfer via direct introduction of exogenous plasmid DNA into a testis as an alternative to microinjectionmediated transgenesis. We found that i) high transmission rate of exogenous DNA to offspring is achieved after TMGT, ii) the pattern of gene transmission from F0 to F2 generations is non-Mendelian, iii) the copy number of exogenous DNA is below 1 copy per diploid cell, and iv) gene expression does not occur or is very slight if it occurs. In this study, we examined the pattern of gene transmission of exogenous DNA in the offspring (at F0 to F2 generations) obtained after TMGT. A complex (70 µl) of circular pCAG/NCre plasmid (a Cre expression plasmid; 8 µg/testis) and FuGENE™6 (16 µ l/testis; Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Germany) was injected into the testes of transgenic mice carrying a loxP-flanked enhanced green fluorescent protein cDNA sequence (termed CETZ-17) 3 times 3 days apart. On 7 to 21 days after final injection, these injected males were mated to superovulated CETZ-17 females to obtain F0 pups. From these mice, F1 and F2 offspring were obtained. Genotyping of these mice was performed by PCR using several primers recognizing several parts of pCAG/NCre. We observed the following: i) at least two types of pCAG/NCre which included intact plasmid and deleted form (lacking pBluescript SK(-) ____________________ *Corresponding author: [email protected] 121 122 vector backbone) of plasmid in F0 offspring, ii) during transition of F0 to F1, conversion of the intact form to the deleted one occurred frequently, and iii) the deletion appeared to occur outside the 1.3-kb NCre gene (probably at a portion containing CAG promoter and the 1st intron of the chicken β-actin gene, and a portion containing the 3’-noncoding region of the rabbit β-globin gene and SV40 poly(A) signals). These findings suggest i) the possible occurrence of autosomal proliferation of plasmid or its survival in mouse tissues during TMGT-mediated gene delivery, and ii) the presence of a regulated mechanism to elicit deletion of the exogenous plasmid pCAG/NCre probably at defined sites. Key Words: Episome, Gene transmission, In vivo gene transfer; PCR, Sperm vector, Testis INTRODUCTION Lavitrano et al. [1] reported that mouse spermatozoa incubated with DNA-containing medium could serve as vectors for introducing exogenous DNA into ova. This technology is therefore termed “sperm-mediated gene transfer (SMGT)”, and is a unique system for efficient production of transgenic animals because of its simplicity. However, contradictory results regarding successful production of transgenics by SMGT have been reported by other investigators working in several mammalian species [2-7]. Recently, Lavitrano and her collaborators demonstrated that SMGT is repeatable [8]. We have examined another possible method of gene transfer in vivo, so-called “testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT)” by introduction of foreign DNA into testes [9-13]. With this approach, exogenous DNA introduced directly into testis appeared to be mainly uptaken by testicular TRANSGENICS S AT O A N D N A K A M U R A spermatozoa, which subsequently transferred the DNA to oocytes through fertilization. Initial experiments were conducted by direct injection of Ca-phosphate-precipitated plasmid DNA, but this attempt failed to produce transgenic mice [9]. However, we later showed that a single injection of circular plasmid DNA complexed with Lipofectin™ into mature mouse testes is sufficient for transfection of spermatozoa (epididymal spermatozoa), and for relatively high efficiency of gene delivery to mid-gestational fetuses (F0) obtained by mating of injected males with normal females [11]. We also found in that study that i) the DNA introduced may have been present mosaically in fetal tissues, since it was estimated to be present at less than 1 copy per diploid cell [11], and ii) the DNA introduced was transmitted at least to the second generation [12]. Expression of the DNA introduced was first evident only in F0 early blastocysts, but almost absent in F0 midgestational fetuses and organs of adult F0 mice [10,12]. We failed to detect any gene expression in these F0 fetuses at Northern blot level, and succeeded in detecting it only in a limited number of samples when nested RT-PCR (a very sensitive method for detection of mRNA) was performed [12]. Furthermore, we tested several commercially available reagents used for in vitro gene transfer to examine which is best for introducing high numbers of copies of exogenous DNA into the fetal mouse genome via TMGT [13]. Unfortunately, we found no candidate reagents for this purpose. We recently assessed the mechanisms of TMGT in greater detail by injection of trypan blue (TB), a dye generally used for staining dead cells in cell culture systems, and Hoechst 33342, a fluorescent dye generally used in staining cell nuclei, into adult murine testes, and found that the solution introduced into testis is transported to the ducts of the caput epididymis via the rete testis and efferent ducts immediately after testis injection and reaches the corpus and cauda epididymis within 3-4 days T E S T I S - M E D I AT E D G E N E T R A N S F E R ( T M G T ) after injection [14]. These findings suggest that exogenous DNA introduced directly into testis was mainly uptaken by epididymal spermatozoa, which subsequently transferred the DNA to oocytes through fertilization. We previously noted that the exogenous gene (circular plasmid) introduced into a testis was in fact transmitted to F1 and F2 generations, but that the pattern of gene transmission from one generation to the next was non-Mendelian [12]. In this study, we examined this phenomenon in detail and found that the introduced plasmid DNA exsisted as an intact form or deleted form lacking a large part of plasmid sequence including vector backbone in the offspring obtained by TMGT. Interestingly, the deletion appeared not to occur randomly, but instead to be confined to certain specific sites on a plasmid, suggesting the presence of unknown, but precisely regulated mechanisms to cleave the exogenous plasmid in the TMGT system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Testis Injection of Plasmid DNA Mixed With Lipid The circular Cre expression vector pCAG/NCre (Figure 1; [15]) was used for testis injection. pCAG/NCre consists of the cytomegalovirus enhancer and chicken β-actin promoter (termed “CAG”; [16]), 1st intron of chicken β-actin promoter, the bacteriophage P1 Cre gene [with the sequence for nuclear location signal (NLS) attached to its 5’ end; hereafter referred to as NCre], a portion of the 2nd intron, 3rd exon and 3’-noncoding region of the rabbit βglobin gene, SV40 poly(A) signals, a portion of pBR322, and pBluescript SK(-) (Stratagene, La Jola, CA). Injection of the DNA-containing solution into testes of CETZ-17 transgenic mice 123 (with B6C3F1 genetic background) aged 3-6 months was performed as described previously [12]. CETZ-17 transgenic mice carry 2-3 copies of transgenes consisting of CAG, loxP-flanked enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) cDNA/chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene, and the lacZ gene (encoding the βgalactosidase), and are used for lineage-analysis in mice with the Cre-loxP system [15]. Briefly, solutions containing circular pCAG/NCre plasmid/lipid complexes were prepared at volumes of 70 µl/testis. For each solution, 16 µl of FuGENE™6 (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) was diluted with 24 µl of phosphate-buffered saline without Ca2+ and Mg2+ [PBS(-)], pH 7.2, and then added to 8 µg of plasmid DNA dissolved in PBS(-) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting DNA/lipid complex solution was slowly injected into the testis of CETZ-17 transgenic male with a 30guage needle (Natsume, Tokyo, Japan) attached to a 1-ml plastic disposable syringe (Termo, Tokyo, Japan) at a depth of 5-6 mm through the capsule of the testis. After injection, the needle was slowly removed. Both testes were injected. For multiple injections (3 repeated injections), injection was repeated 3 days apart. At 7 to 21 days after the final injection, the injected males were mated to superovulated CETZ-17 females every 2 days to obtain F0 pups. These CETZ-17 females had previously been induced to superovulate by two gonadotrophin (eCG-hCG) treatments spaced about 2 days apart. At weaning stage, these F0 mice were subjected to tail isolation for genotyping, and the mice identified as those carrying transgenes were next mated to normal B6C3F1 mice (purchased from Clea Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to obtain F1 offspring. F2 offspring were also obtained from mating between transgenic F1 mice and normal B6C31 mice. These mice were kept on a 12 h light/12 h dark TRANSGENICS 124 schedule (lights on from 0700 h to 1900 h) and allowed food and water ad libitum. Experiments were carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Tokai University. Isolation of Tissues and Genomic Southern Analysis Genomic DNA of tails from weaned mice was isolated as previously described [17] with several modifications [9]. Genomic DNA (10 µg) was digested with Eco RV and Bgl II, which cleave pCAG/NCre DNA twice and release an approximately 1.0-kb fragment containing a 3’ portion of NCre gene, and fractionated by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. To obtain a copy control, 1.17 pg of pCAG/NCre DNA was calculated to be equivalent to one copy of the DNA per diploid cell, based on a genome size of 6 9 x 10 bp per diploid cell. Based on this calculation, purified pCAG/NCre DNA was added to mouse tail (non-treated) DNA to obtain various copy levels of pCAG/NCre DNA, and processed concomitantly as for the experimental samples. After electrophoresis, the DNA was transferred to nylon membrane filters (GeneScreenPlus; NEN, Boston, MA). The filters were hybridized as described by Sato et al. [9]. An Eco RV and Bgl II 0.71-kb fragment (hereafter 32 termed NCre probe) of pCAG/NCre was Plabelled by a random priming labelling method [18] with an Amersham multiprime labelling kit (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England) and used as a probe. PCR Analysis PCR amplification reactions were performed in a total volume of 10 µl, containing 10 mM TrisHCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP, 1 mM TRANSGENICS S AT O A N D N A K A M U R A primers, 1 µg genomic DNA and 0.5 units Taq polymerase (TaKaRa Taq™; #R001A, Takara Shuzo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), as described previously [19]. Forty cycles of PCR reactions were performed in a Perkin Elmer DNA Thermal Cycler (480) with cycle times of 1 min at 94˚C, 1 min at 56˚C and 4 min at 72˚C. Eight sets of primers (A to H) for detection of the introduced pCAG/NCre DNA and the expected length of the DNA fragments amplified by each primer set are shown in Figure 1. For the first screening of tail samples obtained after mating with testis-injected males, primer set A (Cre-2S and Cre-2RV) was used. This primer set yields 300-bp fragments from the 3’ portion of the NCre gene. Cre-2S (5’-GAT CCG AAT AAC TAC CTG TTT3’) corresponds to nucleotides 1,441 to 1,461 in the Cre gene sequence [20], and Cre-2RV (5’-TGT TTC ACT ATC CAG GTT ACG-3’) corresponds to nucleotides 1,740 to 1,720 in the Cre gene sequence [20]. For amplification of a region corresponding to portions of pBR322 and pBluescript SK(-), primer set B (BR-S and Ori-S) was used. This primer set yields approximately 0.8kb fragments. BR-S (5’-CTG CTT CCT AAT GCA GGA GTC-3’) corresponds to nucleotides 616 to 636 in the pBR322 sequence [21], and Ori-S (5’AAC TGA GAT ACC TAC AGC GTG-3’) corresponds to nucleotides 1,433 to 1,413 in the pBluescript SK(-) sequence (Accession No. X52330). For amplification of a region corresponding to a portion (containing a portion of ampicillin resistance gene) of pBluescript SK(-), primer set C (Amp-S and Ori-RV) was used. This primer set yields approximately 1.1-kb fragments. Amp-S (5’-TTG AGT ACT CAC CAG TCA CAG3’) corresponds to nucleotides 2,532 to 2,512 in the pBluescript sequence, and Ori-RV (5’-CAC GCT GTA GGT ATC TCA GTT-3’) corresponds to nucleotides 1,414 to 1,434 in the pBluescript SK(-) sequence. For amplification of a portion of cyomegalovirus ehancer and an ampicillin T E S T I S - M E D I AT E D G E N E T R A N S F E R ( T M G T ) resistance gene-containing region in pBluescript SK(-), primer set D (Amp-RV and CME-RV) was used. This primer set yields approximately 1.55-kb fragments. Amp-RV (5’-GGC TCC AGA TTT ATC AGC AAT -3’) corresponds to nucleotides 2,129 to 2,149 in the pBluescript sequence, and CME-RV (5’-ATG GGC TAT GAA CTA ATG ACC-3’) corresponds to nucleotides 202 to 182 in the cytomegalovirus enhancer sequence [22]. For amplification of a region corresponding to the 3rd exon of rabbit β-globine gene and the 5’ region of NCre gene in the CAG-NCre insert, primer set E (β-gl-1 and Cre-RV) was used. This primer set yields 381-bp fragments from the 5’ portion of the Cre gene in pCAG/NCre. β-gl-1 (5’-CTC CTG GGC AAC GTG CTG GT-3’; [23]) corresponds to the 3rd exon of the rabbit β-globin gene sequence [24] from nucleotides 1,068 to 1,087, and Cre-RV (5’-ATG AAG CAT GTT TAG CTG GCC-3’; [25]) corresponds to nucleotides 761 to 781 in the 5’ region of the Cre gene sequence [20]. For amplification of a region corresponding to the 1st intron of chicken β-actin gene, and a portion of the 2nd intron and 3rd exon of rabbit β-globin gene in the CAG-NCre insert, primer set F (βA-1 and Ex3RV) was used. This primer set yields approximately 520-bp fragments. βA-1 (5’-TCT GAC TGA CCG CGT TAC TCC CAC A-3’) corresponds to nucleotides -1,011 to –987 of the chicken β-actin gene sequence [26], and Ex3-RV (5’-AAC CAG CAC GTT GCC CAG GAG-3’) corresponds to nucleotides 1,311 to 1,291 in the 3rd exon of the rabbit β-globin gene sequence [26]. For amplification of a region corresponding to the 3’ region of NCre gene and a portion of 3’-noncoding region of the rabbit β-globin gene, primer set G (Cre-2S and BGL-RV) was used. This primer set yields approximately 0.8-kb fragments. BGL-RV (5’-GCC AGA AGT CAG ATG CTC AAG-3’) corresponds to nucleotides 1,485 to 1,465 in the 3’-noncoding region of the rabbit β-globin gene sequence [24]. For amplification of a region 125 corresponding to the 3’ region of the NCre gene, the 3’-noncoding region of rabbit β-globin gene, and SV40 poly(A) signals in the CAG-NCre insert, primer set H (Cre-2S and SV-RV) was used. This primer set yields approximately 1.2-kb fragments. SV-RV (5’-ACA ACT AGA ATG CAG TGA AAA3’) corresponds to nucleotides 2,557 to 2,577 in the poly(A) signals of the SV40 DNA sequence [27]. As a positive control, 5 ng of pCAG/NCre DNA was used. As a negative control, 1 µg of genomic tail DNA from a non-transgenic mice was used. Precautionary measures were taken to minimise contamination; PCR mixes were prepared in a biological containment cabinet using sterilized pipette tips in a separate room from where reactions, storage, and handling of PCR products were performed. A separate pipetters and aerosol-resistant tips were used to add PCR premix to the samples. Products of the reaction were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel. A 100 bp ladder (Promega Co., Madison, MI) was used as a molecular weight marker. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide (EtBr), and the amplified DNA bands were visualized by UV illumination. Quantitation of pCAG/NCre DNA in Fetal Samples by PCR To assess the quantity of exogenous DNA in the TMGT-derived offspring, this DNA was used for PCR templates. By comparing the PCR products with PCR products from the copy controls, we calculated the amount of exogenous DNA present. For copy number controls, one copy of pCAG/NCre could be calculated when 1.17 pg of pCAG/NCre DNA was contained in 1 µg of mouse genomic DNA, as described previously. Based on this calculation, 1.17 pg of purified pCAG/NCre DNA was diluted with a solution containing 1 µg of genomic tail DNA from non-transgenic mouse to obtain 1 copy of TRANSGENICS 126 S AT O A N D N A K A M U R A FIGURE 1 Structure of approximately 7-kb pCAG/NCre. The small arrows indicate the positions and directions of the primers used here. The solid lines above pCAG/NCre construct indicate the regions PCR-amplified. The bold line indicates a portion of the 2nd intron, 3rd exon and 3’-noncoding region of the rabbit β-globin gene. The dashed line indicates a portion of pBR322. The thin line indicates pBluescript SK(-) vector. AmpR, ampicillin resistance gene; ATG, translation initiation site; CAG, cytomaglovirus enhancer + chicken β-actin promoter; NCre, nuclear location signal + Cre gene; ori, replication origin of pBluescript SK(-) vector; SVpA, polyadenylation sites of SV40 gene. pCAG/NCre DNA, and then serially diluted with water 10-104-fold. DNA samples from tails were first prepared at a concentration of 1 µg/µl, and then serially diluted with water 10-10 4 -fold. Thirty cycles of PCR with the primer set A (Cre2S and Cre-2RV) were performed on the samples with cycle times of 1 min at 94˚C, 1 min at 56˚C and 2 min at 72˚C. Products of the reaction were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel. The gels were stained with EtBr and the amplified DNA bands were visualized by UV illumination. TRANSGENICS Isolation of PCR Products and Subcloning Into TA Cloning Vector for Sequencing Tail DNA was PCR-amplified using the same conditions as for detection of each part of pCAG/NCre plasmid, except that the total volume was increased to 100 µl. The PCR products were ethanol-precipitated and then electrophoresed through a 1% low-melting-temperature agarose gel (SeaPlaque GTG Agarose; FMC BioProducts, Rockland, ME). The gel slice containing the PCR T E S T I S - M E D I AT E D G E N E T R A N S F E R ( T M G T ) 127 FIGURE 2 A. PCR analysis of genomic DNA of F0 mouse tail. PCR reaction using a primer set A (Cre-2S and Cre-2RV) yielded a 300-bp product (indicated by arrows). Staining of gels with EtBr is shown. Samples indicated by * and ** above the lanes were from females mated to DNA-injected males #2 and #4, respectively. C, non-transgenic tail DNA as negative control; PC, 5 ng of pCAG/NCre as positive control. “m” indicates 100-bp ladder markers. B. Genomic Southern blot analysis of randomly selected F0 mouse tail samples (lanes 1 to 8) derived from DNA-injected male #1 that had been identified as NCre gene positive using primer set A. Genomic DNA (10 µg/lane) was digested with Eco RV/Bgl II (which releases an approximately 0.71-kb fragment containing a 3’ portion of NCre gene) and blotted onto nylon filters prior to hybridization with NCre probe. Each experimental sample was negative for the probe. The copy control C0.1 which corresponds to 0.1 copies/sample did not exhibit any detectable band, while the other copy controls C1, C2 and C5, corresponding to 1, 2 and 5 copies/sample, respectively, exhibited detectable band of expected size (indicated by an arrow). C, DNA from non-transgenic tail. C. Quantitation of pCAG/NCre DNA in TMGTderived F0 tails. Genomic DNA samples were first prepared at 1 µg/µl, and then serially diluted with water 10-104 fold. For copy number controls, purified vector DNA (1.17 pg) was dissolved in a solution containing 1 µg genomic DNA, which yielded 1 copy of DNA per diploid cell. This solution was then serially diluted with water 10-104 fold. These genomic DNA samples and copy number controls were then subjected to PCR using primer set A. All TMGT-derived samples (including samples at F0 to F2 generations) were judged as those with less than 1 copy of exogenous DNA per diploid cell, since they exhibited rapid reduction in intensity of the target band after 10 to 102-fold dilution, whereas the copy control samples did not. TRANSGENICS 128 S AT O A N D N A K A M U R A TABLE I Gene transmission to F0 offspring in the TMGT system and the ratio of mice carrying the intact pCAG/NCre plasmid exogenously introduced. Males testis-injected No. of F0 mice obtained No. of mice positive for the presence of NCre gene (%)a No. of mice carrying intact pCAG/NCre (%)b #1 15 13 (87) 7 (54) #2 17 14 (82) 10 (71) #3 23 23 (100) 12 (50) #4 12 9 (75) 5 (56) a For detection of 3’ portion of NCre gene in pCAG/NCre, genomic DNA was PCR-amplified using primer set A (see Figure 1). Samples carrying 300-bp band were considered positive for the presence of NCre gene. b For detection of intact type of pCAG/NCre in the TMGT-derived samples, PCR was performed using primer set B (see Figure 1). Samples carrying an expected band of approximately 0.8-kb were considered those carrying intact pCAG/NCre. products was melted at 65°C for 30 min and then extracted by saturated phenol. After precipitation with ethanol, the gel-purified PCR product was ligated to TA cloning vector pCR™2.1 (Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA) and the resulting recombinants were evaluated for automated fluorescent sequencing analysis using the ABI PRISM™ Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit with AmpliTaq DNA polymerase, FS (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and universal primer. size detectable after staining with EtBr of gels (Table I). An example of PCR profiles is shown in Figure 2A. However, none of these pCAG/NCre-positive samples possessed more than 1 copy of pCAG/NCre per diploid cell, since genomic Southern blot analysis of these PCR-positive samples failed to detect any hybridizable band despite repeated trials. An example of genomic Southern blot hybridization is shown in Figure 2B. RESULTS Quantitation of pCAG/NCre DNA in Tail Samples by PCR Identification of pCAG/NCre DNA in F0 Offspring Obtained From Mating With DNA-Injected Males On PCR analysis for detection of pCAG/NCre plasmid using primer set A (Figure 1) of genomic DNA isolated from a total of 67 F0 tails from females that had been mated to 4 DNA-injected males (termed #1 to #4), 75 to 100% of the samples had amplified products of the expected TRANSGENICS To assess the quantity of foreign DNA in these PCR-positive samples, the tail DNA samples (1 µg/µl; corresponding to lanes 1 to 8 in Figure 2B) were serially diluted with water 10-10 4 -fold. Concomitantly, 1.17 pg of purified pCAG/NCre DNA was first diluted with a solution containing 1 µg of genomic DNA from non-transgenic tail, and then serially diluted with water 10-104-fold. These diluted samples were subjected to PCR using primer set A. The results are shown in T E S T I S - M E D I AT E D G E N E T R A N S F E R ( T M G T ) 129 FIGURE 3 PCR analyses of randomly selected F0 mouse tail samples (lanes 1 to 8 in Figure 2B) derived from male #1 using primer sets A to C and E to H. Arrows indicate the expected band for each reaction. C, non-transgenic tail DNA as negative control; PC, 5 ng of pCAG/NCre as positive control. “m” indicates 100-bp ladder markers Figure 2C. As expected, all F0 samples (in which three samples are shown as an example in Figure 2C) were estimated to have far less than 1 copy of pCAG/NCre, although slight variation in the level of pCAG/NCre was seen through F0 tail DNA samples. At Least Two Types of pCAG/NCre Exist in the F0 Offspring Obtained After TMGT We examined whether the exogenous pCAG/NCre DNA transmitted to F0 offspring obtained after TMGT exists as an intact form. We first performed long distance (LD) PCR [28] to amplify the entire length of pCAG/NCre TRANSGENICS 130 S AT O A N D N A K A M U R A FIGURE 4 Pedegree of DNA-injected male #1. Transgenicity was first evaluated for tail DNA by PCR using primer set A. Of the NCre genepositive samples, second screening with PCR was performed using primer set B. Mice which were negative for the presence of NCre gene at first screening are designated non-transgenic and indicated by white boxes. Mice which appeared to possess intact pCAG/NCre after second screening are indicated by solid boxes, while mice which appeared to possess deleted form of pCAG/NCre are indicated by dashed boxes. Squares and circles indicate males and females, respectively. Mice are numbered below each symbol. (approximately 7 kb in size) for genomic DNA isolated from F0 tails that has been identified for the presence of the 3’ region of the NCre gene by PCR with primer set A. Unfortunately, this trial failed, probably because the copy number of the introduced pCAG/NCre was very low, as mentioned above. We thus decided to perform general PCR using three other primer sets (B-D; Figure 1) recognizing different portions of pBluescript SK(-) vector, a plasmid backbone for pCAG/NCre. With these primer sets, DNA fragments ranging from 0.8 to 1.55 kb could easily be amplified. When 8 F0 tail samples, which were the same used for genomic Southern blot analysis (Figure 2B) and had been identified as NCre gene-positive using primer set A (panel A in Figure 3), were subjected to PCR amplification using primer set B, only two samples (lanes 1 and 2 in the panel B of Figure 3) yielded a band of the TRANSGENICS expected size (approximately 0.8 kb), and the remaining 6 samples were completely negative for this band (lanes 3-8 in the panel B of Figure 3). The same samples were next subjected to PCR using primer set C. As shown in the panel C of Figure 3, only two samples corresponding to lanes 1 and 2 possessed the expected 1.1-kb band, while the remaining ones did not. PCR using primer set D yielded the same results as obtained from PCR using primer sets B and C (data not shown). These findings suggest that the samples corresponding to lanes 3-8 in Figure 3 contain a portion of the NCre gene, but lack a portion corresponding to the pBluescript SK(-) vector sequence. On the other hand, the samples corresponding to lanes 1 and 2 in Figure 3 appear to contain all of pCAG/NCre. Sequencing of the products PCR-amplified from the sample corresponding to lane 1 in Figure T E S T I S - M E D I AT E D G E N E T R A N S F E R ( T M G T ) 131 FIGURE 5 PCR analysis of F1 and F2 tail DNA samples derived from lines #9 and #10 using primer set B. All samples positive for the presence of the 3’ portion of NCre gene after PCR using primer set A were tested. Arrows indicate the band as expected. Circles above lanes indicate samples which appear to carry intact pCAG/NCre in their genome. The number for each lane corresponds to mice shown in Figure 4. PC, 5 ng of pCAG/NCre as positive control. “m” indicates 100-bp ladder markers. 3 using primer sets A to D demonstrated that sequence homologies between the PCR products and authentic plasmid were 100, 99.5, 100 and 99.3% for the regions corresponding to A to D in pCAG/NCre, respectively (data not shown). This comfirmed that the introduced pCAG/NCre DNA in the sample corresponding to lane 1 in Figure 3 was present in intact form. From these findings, it may be concluded that there are at least two types of pCAG/NCre, an intact type and a deleted one, in TMGT-derived F0 mice. We next determined the percentage of intact pCAG/NCre present in the F0 offspring obtained from mating with each of 4 DNA-injected males. Screening was performed using PCR with primer set B for the tail DNA samples that had previously been identified as transgenics using primer set A. As listed in Table I, 50-71% of the F0 offspring appeared to possess intact pCAG/NCre in their genome. An Attempt to Determine Deleted Regions in pCAG/NCre in the TMGT-Derived F0 Offspring As previously described, we found that the introduced pCAG/NCre plasmid lacked the pBluescript SK(-) vector sequence in 6 of 8 NCre gene-positive tails tested. In an attempt to determine the deletion sites in pCAG/NCre in more detail, we performed PCR using primer sets E to H (Figure 1). When the same samples shown in the panels A to C in Figure 3 were PCRamplified using primer sets E and G, which recognize the 5’ and 3’ end regions of the NCre gene in pCAG/NCre, respectively, a distinct band of the expected size was observed in all the samples tested for each PCR (panels E and G in Figure 3). PCR using primer sets F and H, however, failed to generate a distinct band in the 6 samples (corresponding to lanes 3 to 8 in Figure TRANSGENICS 132 S AT O A N D N A K A M U R A 3) considered to carry a deleted form of pCAG/NCre. The remaining two samples (corresponding to lanes 1 and 2 in Figure 3), which had been considered to possess intact pCAG/NCre, exhibited a distinct band of the expected size. These findings suggest that deletion may have occurred at a portion spanning CAG to the 1st intron of the chicken β-actin gene and a portion spanning a 3’-noncoding region of the rabbit β-globin gene to SV40 poly(A) signals in pCAG/NCre. was found in any F2 offspring obtained after mating between the F1 mouse carrying deleted form of pCAG/NCre and a normal mouse (Figure 4; lower panel of Figure 5), suggesting that once deletion occurs, recovery of intact pCAG/NCre is impossible. PCR-mediated quantitation of pCAG/NCre DNA in the F1 and F2 tail samples revealed that these F1 and F2 samples had far less than 1 copy of pCAG/NCre as did F0 parental sample (Figure 2C). Pattern of Transmission of pCAG/NCre From F0 to F2 Generations DISCUSSION To examine the pattern of transmission of the exogenous plasmid pCAG/NCre DNA in the TMGT-derived mice, we made two lines (termed “line #9” and “line #10”) derived from the DNAinjected male #1. In Figure 4, the pedgrees of lines #9 and #10 are shown. The parental F0 females (#9 and #10) were previously identified as those carrying intact pCAG/NCre after PCR using primer sets A and B. Tail DNA samples from the F1 and F2 generations were first examined for the presence of 3’ portion of NCre gene by PCR using primer set A. As shown in Figure 4, high rates of gene transmission were obtained from F0 to F1 and F1 to F2 generations in this TMGT system, as pointed out previously [12]. The 2nd genotyping using PCR with primer set B was next performed to identify mice carrying intact pCAG/NCre. Figure 5 indicates the results of genotyping of samples from the F1 and F2 generations derived from lines #9 and #10 obtained by PCR using primer set B. The intact pCAG/NCre present in both parental F0 females (#9 and #10) was not transmitted to all F1 offspring. In other words, deletion of pCAG/NCre occurred during transition from the F0 to F1 generations with a relatively high degree of frequency. Interestingly, no intact pCAG/NCre TRANSGENICS In this study, we used CETZ-17 transgenic mice [15] to visualize the effect of transgene expression of a Cre expression plasmid, pCAG/NCre. The timing and extent of expression of exogenous DNA can be studied using CETZ-17 mice, since transient Cre expression will leave behind a permanent signature in the form of lacZ activity. In a preliminary test [29], we observed that expression of pCAG/NCre could be detected by RT-PCR, although it appeared to be very weak, and the number of fetuses expressing NCre mRNA was low (24%) among those carrying exogenous DNA. We found that 14.9% of TMGT-derived mid-gestational F0 fetuses exhibited lacZ activity, although strength of activity was very low. This efficiency (14.9%) of fetal expression of lacZ activity appears to be roughly correlated with the efficiency (24%) of expression of NCre mRNA by fetuses. Furthermore, we observed production of CZ, a recombined fragment generated from the integrated CETZ-17 transgenes, in the NCre mRNA-expressing fetuses by PCR. Unfortunately, this NCre mRNA expression and generation of CZ could not be detected at F1 and F2 generations (data not shown). These findings suggest that expression of the exogenous gene is transient, probably because pCAG/NCre is unintegrated. One of the most important issues to be T E S T I S - M E D I AT E D G E N E T R A N S F E R ( T M G T ) considered in the TMGT system appears to be how the exogenous plasmid DNA is transmitted from one generation to the next and is present in mouse tissues. As mentioned above, the TMGT system differs from pronuclear microinjectionmediated transgenesis in several respect such as difficulty in detection of hybridizable bands on genomic Southern blot hybridization, lack of success in plasmid rescue experiments, high frequency of generation of transgenic progeny, inability to introduce more than 1 copy of exogenous plasmid DNA per diploid cell into TMGT-derived offspring and high frequency (non-Mendelian) of transmission of the transgene from one generation to the next. DNA may thus be present mosaically in tissues. Mosaicism should not be passed on to the next generation. At present, it is difficult to imagine a mechanism by which epigenetic genes could be passed on. At present, we are unable to explain why or how the foreign DNA sequences are propagated in growing fetuses and probably in adult mouse tissues, since the replication origin of pCAG/NCre plasmid (with pBluescript SK(-) backbone) is derived from E. coli. In this study, we demonstrated that exogenous pCAG/NCre plasmid is present intact in tissues of the TMGTderived F0 offspring, suggesting that pCAG/NCre may be maintained extrachromosomally. To confirm this, we performed plasmid rescue [30] or Hirt extraction [31] or a modification of it [32] to recover pCAG/NCre plasmid from the F0 tail samples carrying intact pCAG/NCre, but both failed despite repeated trials (data not shown). We also performed inverse PCR [33,34] to test for integration of the foreign sequences into host genome. Unfortunately, we were unable to detect any chromosomal sequences flanked by the transgene (data not shown). Further modifications and refinements will be required to determine whether the exogenous plasmid DNA is present episomally or integrated into the host 133 genome. One possible approach would be construction of a genomic library from tail DNA of the TMGT-derived F0 or F1 offspring. With this library, genomic clones carrying a chromosomal sequence flanked by the transgene will be picked up if the transgene is integrated into the mouse genome. Another approach is to introduce a DNA fragment having no replication origin or linearized plasmid DNA into testes. In the former case, the DNA fragment lacking a replication origin would exhibit different behavior, as does plasmid DNA in the TMGT system. In the latter case, when the linearized plasmid DNA is introduced into testes, it might be recircularized in mouse tissues and then behave like a circular plasmid. Another interesting finding of this study is the generation of a deleted form of the plasmid exogenously introduced. Interestingly, the deletion sites in pCAG/NCre plasmid appeared to be the same among the F0 tail samples tested (see Figure 3). These deletions were confined to two regions (a portion spanning CAG to the 1st intron of the chicken β-actin gene and a portion spanning the 3’-noncoding region of the rabbit βglobin gene to SV40 poly(A) signals) in pCAG/NCre. Furthermore, this type of deletion was also found in F1 offspring (see Figures 4,5). Once deletion occurs, recovery of intact pCAG/NCre appears to be difficult, since mating of F1 mice carrying a deleted form of pCAG/NCre with normal mice always resulted in production of F2 offspring carrying a deleted form of pCAG/NCre (see Figure 4). These findings suggest the presence of a mechanism of regulation to elicit deletion of the exogenous plasmid pCAG/NCre in mice. To test this, detailed mapping of the deletion sites found in the TMGT-derived offspring is now ongoing. Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Toshiteru Watanabe (Tokai TRANSGENICS 134 University School of Medicine) for maintaining DNA-injected animals and providing them to us. We are also grateful to Drs. Minoru Kimura (Tokai University School of Medicine), Shyoso Ogawa (Meiji University) and Norihiro Tada (Juntendo University School of Medicine) for their helpful comments and suggestions on the TMGT technology. This study was supported by a grant from The Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan. REFERENCES [1] Lavitrano, M., Camaioni, A., Fazio, V.M., Dolci, S., Farace, M.G., Spadafora, C. (1989). Sperm cells as vectors for introducing foreign DNA into eggs: Genetic transformation of mice. Cell, 57, 717-723. [2] Brinster, R.L., Sandgren, E.P., Behringer, R.R., Palmiter, R.D. (1989). No simple solution for making transgenic mice. Letters to the editor. Cell, 59, 239-241. [3] Hochi, S., Ninomia, T., Mizuno, A., Honma, M., Yuki, A. (1990). Fate of exogenous DNA carried into mouse eggs by spermatozoa. Animal Biotechnol, 1, 21-31. [4] Bachiller, D., Schellander, K., Peli, J., Rüther, U. (1991). Liposome-mediated DNA uptake by sperm cells. Mol Reprod Dev, 30, 194-200. [5] Schellander, K., Peli, J., Schmall, F., Brem, G. (1995). Artificial insemination in cattle with DNA-treated sperm. Animal Biotechnol, 6, 41-50. S AT O A N D N A K A M U R A [11] Sato, M., Gotoh, K., Kimura, M. (1999). Sperm-mediated gene transfer by direct injection of foreign DNA into mouse testis. Transgenics, 2, 357-369. [12] Sato, M., Yabuki, K., Watanabe, T., Kimura, M. (1999). Testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT) in mice: Successful transmission of introduced DNA from F0 to F2 generations. Transgenics, 3, 11-22. [13] Sato, M., Watanabe, T., Yasuoka, Y., Kodama, H., Kimura, M. (2001). Testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT) in mice: Attempts to improve TMGT using commercially available reagents used for gene transfer in mammalian culture system. Transgenics, 3, 131-141. [14] Sato, M., Ishikawa, A., Kimura, M. (2002). Direct injection of foreign DNA into mouse testis as a possible in vivo gene transfer system via epididymal spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev, 61, 49-56. [15] Sato, M., Yasuoka, Y., Kodama, H., Watanabe, T., Miyazaki, J., Kimura, M. (2000). New approach to cell lineage analysis in mammals using the Cre-loxP system. Mol Reprod Dev, 56, 34-44. [16] Niwa, H., Yamamura, K., Miyazaki, J. (1991). Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene, 108, 193-200. [17] Blin, N., Stafford, D.W. (1976). A general method for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res, 3, 2303-2308. [18] Feinberg, A.P., Vogelstein, B. (1984). A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem, 137, 266-267. [19] Sato, M., Kasai, K., Tada, N. (1995). A sensitive method of testing for transgenic mice using polymerase chain reaction-Southern hybridization. Genetic Anal: Biomol Engin, 12, 109-111. [20] Sternberg, N., Hamilton, D. (1981). Bacteriophage P1 site-specific recombination. I. Recombination between loxP sites. J Mol Biol, 150, 467-486. [6] Gandolfi, F., Terqui, M., Modina, S., Brevini, T.A., Ajmone-Marsan, P., Foulon-Gouzé, F., Fourot, M. (1996). Failure to produce transgenic offspring by intratubal insemination of gifts with DNA-treated sperm. Reprod Fertil Dev, 8, 1055-1060. [21] Sutcliffe, J.G. (1978). Nucleotide sequence of the ampicillin resistance gene of Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 75, 3737-3741. [7] Sperandio, S., Lulli, V., Bacci, M.L., Forni, M., Maione, B., Spadafora, C., Lavitrano, M. (1996). Sperm-mediated DNA transfer in bovine and swine species. Animal Biotechnol, 7, 59-77. [22] Boshart, M., Weber, F., Jahn, G., Dorsch-Haesler, K., Fleckenstein, B., Schaffner, W. (1985). A very strong enhancer is located upstream of an immediate early gene of human cytomegalovirus. Cell, 41, 521-530. [8] Maione, B., Lavitrano, M., Spadafora, C., Kiessling, A.A. (1998). Sperm-mediated gene transfer in mice. Mol Reprod Dev, 50, 406-409. [23] Kawarabayashi, T., Shoji, M., Sato, M., Sasaki, A., Ho, L., Echman, C.B., Prada, C.-M., Younkin, S.G., Kobayashi, T., Tada, N., Matsubara, E., Iizuka, T., Harigaya, Y., Kasai, K., Hirai, S. (1996). Accumulation of β-amyloid fibrils in pancreas of transgenic mice. Neurobiol Aging, 17, 215-222. [9] Sato, M., Iwase, R., Kasai, K., Tada, N. (1994). Direct injection of foreign DNA into mouse testis as a possible alternative of sperm-mediated gene transfer. Animal Biotechnol, 5, 19-31. [10] Ogawa, S., Hayashi, K., Tada, N., Sato, M., Kurihara, T., Iwaya, M. (1995). Gene expression in blastocysts following direct injection of DNA into testis. J Reprod Dev, 41, 379-382. TRANSGENICS [24] van Ooyen, A., van der Berg, J., Mantei, N., Weissmann, C. (1979). Comparison of total sequence of a cloned rabbit β-globin gene and its flanking regions with a homologous mouse sequence. Science, 206, 337-344. [25] Sato, M., Watanabe, T., Kimura, M. (1999). Embryo T E S T I S - M E D I AT E D G E N E T R A N S F E R ( T M G T ) transfer via oviductal wall: An alternative method for efficient production of transgenic mice. Transgenics, 2, 383-389. [26] Kost, T.A., Theodorakis, N., Hughes, S.H. (1983). The nucleotide sequence of the chick cytoplasmic β-actin gene. Nucleic Acids Res, 11, 8287-8301. [27] Fiers, W., Contreras, R., Haegeman, G., Rogiers, R., Van de Voorde, A., Van Heuverswyn, H., Van Herreweghe, J., Volckaert, G., Ysebaert, M. (1978). Complete nucleotide sequence of SV40 DNA. Nature, 273, 113-120. 135 [30] Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor: New York. [31] Hirt, B. (1967). Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures. J Mol Biol, 26, 365369. [32] Arad, U. (1998). Modified Hirt procedure for rapid purification of extrachromosomal DNA from mammalian cells. BioTechniques, 24, 760-762. [28] Barnes, W.M. (1994). PCR amplification of up to 35-kb DNA with high fidelity and high yield from λ bacteriophage templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 91, 2216-2220. [33] Triglia, T., Peterson, M.G., Kemp, D.J. (1988). A procedure for in vitro amplification of DNA segments that lie outside the boundaries of known sequence. Nucleic Acids Res, 16, 8186. [29] Sato, M., Nakamura, S. Testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT) in mice: Effects of repeated DNA injections on the efficiency of gene delivery and expression. Transgenics (in press). [34] Ochman, H., Gerber, A.S., Hartl, D.L. (1988). Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction. Genetics, 120, 621-623. TRANSGENICS
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz