Red and Grey: Toward a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism By Peter Coates The Eccles Centre for American Studies The Ninth Annual Eccles Centre for American Studies Plenary Lecture given at the British Association for American Studies Annual Conference, 2012 www.bl.uk/ecclescentre Published by The British Library The design, setting and camera ready copy was produced at The British Library Design Office ISBN 0 7123 4465 9 Copyright © 2013 The British Library Board Red and Grey: Toward a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism By Peter Coates The Eccles Centre for American Studies The Ninth Annual Eccles Centre for American Studies Plenary Lecture given at the British Association for American Studies Annual Conference, 2012 www.bl.uk/ecclescentre PETER COATES is Professor of American and Environmental History at the University of Bristol. His books include Environment and History: The Taming of Nature in the USA and South Africa [with William Beinart] (1995); Nature: Western Attitudes since Ancient Times (1998); Salmon (2006); American Perceptions of Immigrant and Invasive Species: Strangers on the Land (2006) and A Story of Six Rivers: History, Culture and Ecology (2013). Between 1988 and 1990, he was curator of the US collections at the British Library – a time, shortly before the move to the Library’s new site at St Pancras, when plans for the Eccles Centre were hatching, the new building was taking shape and he worked closely with Douglas W Bryant and the American Trust for the British Library. He remembers taking a tour of the building site with Doug and other Trust members. Red and Grey: Toward a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 1. Introduction: Ecological imperialism: Over There and Over Here ‘Ecological imperialism’ has become a familiar concept for historians of colonial America. Coined in 1986 by the pioneering environmental historian, Alfred Crosby, the term refers to the impact of European flora and fauna transferred to new-found-lands like the Americas – and their instrumental role as unwitting allies of colonization.1 It is hard to imagine American cuisine without beef and wheat. Yet of the ingredients from which the hamburger is assembled, just one – the tomato slice – is native to the new world. In addition to economically useful animals and plants, however, ecological imperialism also involved introductions that turned out to be far less desirable than anticipated. Crosby emphasized the asymmetry of the biotic exchange between ‘old’ and ‘new’ worlds. And this was particularly the case for species, with unintended consequences. Europe, he stressed, had received few ‘problem’ species in return for the plethora of notorious invasive non-natives that Europeans had inflicted on North America – not least the ‘English’ sparrow and the ‘European’ starling, which, he explained, ‘dispossessed millions of American birds’. 2 One of the best known animal stories of Ernest Thompson Seton, a Canadian-American nature writer who founded the Woodcraft Indians, concerns the adventures of two ‘English’ sparrows, Randy and Biddy, in Manhattan’s urban wilderness (1901). Well-meaning American acclimatization societies introduced what were properly called house sparrows (Passer domesticus) in the 1850s to combat a plague of indigenous caterpillars that was ravaging the foliage of shade trees in east coast cities. Unfortunately, the policy backfired (a suitable subject for a lecture on Friday the Thirteenth!); the avian newcomers ignored the caterpillars in favour of the kernels of grain that studded the copious quantities of horse droppings that festooned the urban environment in the pre-automobile age. A pen and ink drawing of a vacant bird box that accompanied Seton’s story evoked 2 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism the widespread public hostility toward this very successfully naturalized ‘feathered foreigner’ – and associated Anglophobia – at the height of the so-called ‘Sparrow War’. Like his ‘little John Bulls’, Seton was an English immigrant – born and raised on Tyneside in South Shields.3 In fact, the flow of troublesome and unwanted biotic traffic across the Atlantic wasn’t quite as one-directional as Crosby and Seton implied. A British historian of the British empire, John MacKenzie, has taken a different view of the distribution of unwanted species between Europe and America. For MacKenzie, Crosby’s perspective was a ‘strikingly American one, for anyone who lives in the British Isles is almost daily brought face to face with the fact that ecological colonialism has been a two-way process’.4 Plenty of American animals have flourished in the UK and caused headaches. What I want to do in this evening’s Eccles Centre Lecture is shift attention from the European species over there to the American species over here. In Britain, controversial ‘immigrant’ animals abound, and many of the most heavily contested are North American transplants. 2. Bio-Villains Made in America Animals, as the anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss reflected, are not only ‘“good to eat”’ but also ‘“good to think”’.5 An animal is rarely just an animal. It is a symbolic and discursive entity as well as a flesh-andblood creature. And an animal is particularly good to think with when it is served up wrapped in the flag. The role of anti-American sentiments in attitudes to problematic American animals is, without doubt, the least studied aspect of the heavily studied topic of anti-Americanism in Europe. Not one of the flurry of books on anti-Americanism, whether in Britain or on the continent, published within the inflamed climate of opinion during the George W Bush regime (2000-08) mentions reactions to disruptive animals of American provenance.6 ‘For some reason, the [American] people I meet in my country are not the same as the ones I knew in the United States’, declared a Burmese journalist in The Ugly American, the 1958 novel set in Indo-China: ‘A mysterious change seems to come over Americans when they go to a foreign land. They isolate themselves socially. They live pretentiously. Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 3 They’re loud and ostentatious’.7 This touches on a key characteristic of all invasive species: whether human, animal or plant, they behave differently when removed from their customary habitats, released from the usual constraints of the environments within which they’ve evolved. The grey squirrel is relatively innocuous on its home turf. There is no Japanese Knotweed problem in Japan. Nor is kudzu (‘the vine that ate the South’) a problem in its Japanese homeland (a phenomenon that scientists refer to as the ‘enemy release hypothesis’). Good and fairly harmless (perhaps even beautiful) Americans become ugly, harmful Americans when unleashed abroad. I’ll now examine the British proclivity, past and present, to humanize American animals through analogy with Americans and American character traits: bigger, bolder, brasher and more bustling. By scrutinizing animals resident in Britain yet withheld faunal citizenship – particularly the grey squirrel – this talk is a very tentative attempt at a natural history of British anti-Americanism. The strong American representation among animals considered to be natural disasters in Britain was highlighted in an audit of non-native species conducted in 2005 by English Nature – the statutory UK government agency responsible for wildlife and nature conservation (since re-named Natural England). Of the twelve non-native animals wreaking the most serious havoc – the dirty dozen – five were North American: signal crayfish, Canada goose, ruddy duck, mink and grey squirrel. The Environment Agency’s recent compilations of the ‘Top Ten Most Wanted Foreign Species’ confirm this high American profile. The signal crayfish and mink rank second and third on the list (2006). The terminology of ‘most wanted’ has, of course, also been imported from the United States. (And ‘most wanted’ actually means ‘least wanted’!) In an arresting example from its natural cultural habitat, a poster issued by California’s Department of Water Resources (2005) to raise public awareness of the threat posed by the zebra mussel personifies this freshwater bivalve by deploying the familiar mythology of the western frontier: ‘volunteer for a posse’ to ‘arrest the spread’ of the ‘outlaws’. The signal crayfish exemplifies the characteristics that have equipped various American species for competitive success. Introduced to southern England in the early 1970s to establish a crayfish farming industry for the restaurant trade, the freshwater crustacean readily escaped its tanks. Relative to its native counterpart, the white-clawed crayfish, the American 4 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism cousin is bigger and more assertive. It breeds earlier and lays more eggs, which hatch sooner. It eats a wider range of foods, is more tolerant of poor water quality, and, to cap it off, carries and spreads a deadly fungal disease from which it enjoys immunity. Able to crawl considerable distances and climb substantial heights, it colonizes watercourses at the rate of a kilometre a year. Moreover, unlike the white-clawed crayfish, it burrows, and its excavations honeycomb river banks, rendering them liable to collapse. The signal crayfish has also begun to colonize tributaries of the Tweed in southern Scotland, where its taste for salmon eggs threatens recovery of salmon stocks. In England, indigenous crayfish have been virtually supplanted south of a line between the Severn and the Humber. The pejorative humanization of American species by UK government scientists, natural resource managers, journalists and members of the public alike is incorrigible. The Environment Agency explains that signal crayfish and mink have ‘taken advantage of Britain’s welcoming living conditions’ and ‘overstayed their environmental visa’ (2006). The British National Party has also become a vigorous exponent of ecological nationalism as well as a critic of human immigration. The party’s website includes a section on ‘eco-threats’ that features stories about the misdeeds of alien species and the plight of natives. The British National Party’s legal officer recently characterized the signal crayfish as ‘the Mike Tyson of crayfish…a diseased, psychotic, evil, illegal immigrant colonist who displaces the indigenous crayfish, colonises their territory and then reproduces until it totally devastates the indigenous environment and indigenous crayfish’.8 Metaphors of the vicious, fast breeding, all-conquering alien also saturated the earlier debate about the mink ‘menace’ in the 1970s and 1980s. A semi-aquatic member of the weasel family, the mink, was imported to stock fur farms in the 1920s, but it proved to be an accomplished escape artist. Inmates were also released by bankrupt mink farmers and ‘liberated’ by animal rights activists. By the early 1950s, the mink was firmly rooted in the English countryside and few animals were more vilified. As well as being routinely blamed by fishermen and conservationist for the depletion of native fish and waterfowl populations, this ‘deadly’ ‘American invader’ was heavily implicated in the declining numbers of otter and water vole.9 The impact on the water vole has been particularly distressing due to the automatic association with Ratty in The Wind in the Willows (1908). Thanks to Kenneth Grahame’s novel (Theodore Roosevelt, a great fan, was instrumental in securing publication Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 5 of an American edition with Scribner’s)10, this unlikely rodent has been enshrined in the affections of generations of Britons: a perfect example of charismatic mini-fauna. Shifting from aquatic to terrestrial newcomers, the grey squirrel arrived in Britain half a century before the mink. Nonetheless, this is the American animal that still generates the most heated public debate. Perhaps because it occupies the highest profile of any wild animal in the daily lives of millions of Britons, being a co-resident of our city parks and backyards, it represents the clearest and most present danger. The British often compare the pestiferous grey’s misbehaviour in Britain to the North American depredations of the uncouth and bullying ‘English’ sparrow and the ruthlessly expansionist ‘European’ starling. Enter the four-legged, furry and very nimble Ugly American. 3. Grey Advance and Red Retreat The grey squirrel is Britain’s oldest American faunal immigrant, arriving in the 1870s, during an era of innocent faith in the virtues of acclimatization. It quickly became naturalized and rapidly expanded its range. The belief that this success was inimical to the native red squirrel’s welfare took hold while it was still being released. The leading British squirrel researcher of the 1920s, A D Middleton, a zoologist at Oxford University, reported the deep seated belief among the human residents of areas colonized by greys that the red ‘has been reduced in numbers or driven out by the introduced aliens’. Middleton reported the rumour – completely unsubstantiated – that the male grey castrated its red counterpart by biting off its testicles. Equally fanciful rural folklore held that male greys were massacring red squirrel litters and interbreeding to produce a hybrid offspring that was more grey than red.11 In 1936, twenty-six county councils distributed more than 5,000 posters beseeching the public to ‘kill the tree rat’. In 1937, it was designated an official pest because of damage to hardwoods, cereal crops and fruit trees. A subsequently introduced bounty system lasted until 1958, but hardly dented vibrant grey numbers. A nationalistic element has long been more or less inseparable from this consternation. Just as BP pointedly became British Petroleum again in 6 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism the United States in April 2010 (at least within the White House and on Capitol Hill), in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico, it was not just a grey squirrel but an American grey squirrel. And not just a tree rat but an American tree rat. On the opening page of his landmark study of the grey squirrel in Britain (1931), Middleton remarked that ‘I know of more than one patriotic Englishman who has been embittered against the whole American nation on account of the presence of their squirrels in his garden’.12 And forty years later, in a letter to The Times (21 October 1971), the owner of a terrorized woodland garden admitted that ‘in respect of the alien grey immigrant I plead guilty to racial discrimination’. Though the native grounds of Sciurus carolinensis are by no means confined to the territory of the United States, there are relatively few British references, even in zoological literature, to the North American grey squirrel or the Eastern grey squirrel of North America. And references to a Canadian grey squirrel are conspicuous by their complete absence.13 This demonization did not escape American attention. The New York Times reported the Forestry Commission’s investigation in the late 1920s of the grey squirrel’s impact on timber resources. The reporter reckoned that prejudice was so strong that it was unlikely to receive a fair appraisal. A year later, the New York Times drew attention to the many ‘outbursts’ against the ‘gray invader’ triggered by ‘patriotic’ naturalists, foresters and agriculturalists. Integral to the grey’s vilification was the rehabilitation of its alleged victim, which is not only smaller and less prolific, but also portrayed as gentler and ‘cuter’. The red squirrel is distributed across Eurasia, from Portugal to Japan, but there are seventeen sub-species – one of which is endemic to Britain. As various commentators pointed out in the 1920s, the ‘attractive American stranger’ was mischievous and destructive – though no more so than the pesky red squirrel.14 Yet with a little help from one of Beatrix Potter’s most beloved animal creations, Squirrel Nutkin (1903), the red has been converted from forester’s scourge into national animal emblem. As Hilda Keen has observed, the red squirrel has assumed a hallowed position in the pantheon of Englishness alongside red phone boxes, warm beer, and cricket bats.15 Very John Major! Potter tried to capitalize on Squirrel Nutkin’s popularity with a follow-up story about a grey squirrel who she described as ‘little, fat and comfortable’ Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 7 and called Timmy Tiptoes. Timmy’s national origin is not mentioned. Nor is the story’s North American setting. But since the cast of characters includes a bear and a chipmunk, this is clearly not the Lake District, which, at the time – 1911 – was still beyond the grey frontier line. Though Timmy and his wife, Goody, drink tea like good British squirrels, the story was a flop. Once known simply as the ‘common’ squirrel, by 1945, the red was highly uncommon south of the Scottish border. A prominent British natural history writer lamented that ‘our island race’ was confined to ‘islands’ of conifer plantations amidst a ‘sea of grey squirrel country’.16 The Lake District, home of Potter and Squirrel Nutkin, was one of those islands – a besieged fortress of a species whose numbers have plunged to c. 160,000 (down from c. 12 million on the eve of human colonization), whereas the grey’s British population currently stands at about 2.5 million (of which 2 million are in England). Though England’s largest surviving red colony – c. 9,000 – is housed in Kielder Forest, Northumberland, another stronghold is the red squirrel reserve in the pinewoods at Sefton on the Lancashire coast, just north of Liverpool, at Formby, about 40 miles from Manchester. I was born and raised in this neck of the woods, so red squirrels were part of boyhood. 4. The Grey Scare and Red Crusade Riding to the rescue like the 7th Cavalry in the 1956 Western movie are the hereditary members of Parliament’s upper chamber. Perhaps because they feel a large dose of empathy with a fellow endangered species, British aristocrats like few things better, it seems, than discussing the grey’s infamy and the red’s plight. Today’s ‘British’ squirrels are in fact mostly descended from continental European specimens brought over in the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century for restocking purposes, as native red populations plummeted for reasons unrelated to the arrival and spread of the grey American cousin. But the ‘native’ squirrel’s political champions are immune to this irony. During a typically impassioned House of Lords debate in 1998, Lord Inglewood of Cumbria identified the creature as the ‘most lovable and loved of our British native animals’.17 In the Lords’ squirrel debate of 2006, Lady Saltoun of Abernethy pronounced the red’s innate superiority. Cloaking the iconic national 8 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism animal in the admirable qualities of a better class of person, she observed that they are ‘rather like quiet, well behaved people, who do not make a nuisance or an exhibition of themselves, or commit crimes, and so do not get themselves into the papers in the vulgar way grey squirrels do’.18 This was a particularly fine example, if in sublimated form, of a distinctive form of anti-Americanism traditionally associated with the British establishment – the anti-Americanism of cultural condescension.19 The distinction between squirrels in Britain and British squirrels is subtle but crucial. Speaking in the debate of 1998, Lord Rowallan observed that ‘we should not encourage them merely because they are beautiful animals… They have another advantage – they are British’. By 2006, the hapless red was even more embattled. For Lord Inglewood, desperate times demanded drastic measures. He urged Jamie Oliver, who’d recently launched his campaign to revolutionize British school dinners, to add the grey squirrel to the canteen menu. Because ‘unless something radical and imaginative is done…Squirrel Nutkin and his friends and relations are “going to be toast”’. Red squirrel defence groups are spreading at the rate of the grey squirrel itself. The Red Squirrel Survival Trust’s patron is HRH The Prince of Wales and Save Our Squirrels, a campaign operated by Red Alert (since renamed Red Squirrels Northern England), received National Heritage Lottery funding (2006) to operate sixteen reserves in northern England. Drawings of red squirrels by personalities from the worlds of music, comedy, sport, television and radio, stage and screen, were auctioned on the Internet in September 2000 to raise money for Red Alert. At the moment, though, only the movement’s militant tendency endorses the philosophy of ‘eat a grey to save a red’ (which I’ve translated into a catchphrase of which I’m really proud: ‘if you can’t beat them, eat them’). 20 On the firing line of the northeast frontier is the estate of Lord Rupert Redesdale, a Liberal Democrat whose seat in Northumberland, which borders on Kielder Forest, is graced by a remnant stock of red squirrels. For many British countryside enthusiasts and nature lovers, the grey squirrel is inauthentic – an impostor upsetting the nation’s natural status quo. Redesdale’s sidekick, Paul Parker, is a plain speaking Geordie whose mission is elegant in its simplicity: to kill grey squirrels. The self-styled ‘Verminator’ and his vainglorious extermination crusade featured in the television documentary, ‘Squirrel Wars: Red versus Grey’, shown on Channel 4 on 9 July 2009.21 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 9 The popular case against the grey squirrel in the UK is so entrenched that it is largely impervious to research suggesting that its initial spread was not in fact responsible for the red’s decline. Red squirrel populations have a long history of fluctuation. They were under stress in many parts of England before the grey’s advent because of disease and the retreat of coniferous woodland. Rather than displacing reds, greys usually advanced into emptied territory. (Ironically, the firm conservationist preference, on ecological and aesthetic grounds, for native deciduous trees, works to the grey’s advantage. Reds cannot digest acorns as readily as greys.) A surprisingly outlet for these revisionist findings was a children’s book. The Further Exploits of Mr. Saucy Squirrel (1977). The author was Woodrow Wyatt, a former Labour MP, who became a Conservative life peer in 1987. The central character is a dapper squirrel whose rural seat is a beech tree near Devizes in Wiltshire. Despite his impeccably English dress, manner and pursuits, Saucy Squirrel is actually a grey squirrel. Asked if he is ‘a good English squirrel’ when he goes shopping for a bowler hat, he replies: ‘Dear me. I’m always being asked that question. We are not the old kind of English squirrel people call the red squirrel. But we’ve been here a long time now’. Nor does he suffer from an identity crisis or divided allegiance: ‘We came from America so long ago that we are now properly naturalised English. I don’t sing “The Star-Spangled Banner”...I sing “God Save The Queen”’. Mr Saucy Squirrel is also at pains to explain that the ‘English’ squirrel was already in trouble when its American cousin arrived: ‘We just took over in various places that they’d already left’.22 Wyatt’s charming picture of Anglo-American co-existence and harmony is nevertheless rather overdone. Greys may not be entirely responsible for the reds’ decline, but they probably prevented recovery. Moreover, most greys now carry a virus – squirrelpox – that kills reds by turning their brains to mush within a fortnight. 5. Squirrels and Anti-Americanism Nonetheless, even-handed squirrel researchers face an uphill struggle. The grey continues to serve as a handy scapegoat. Here are just a few recent examples of the cultural construction of an unsavoury Yankee critter – a portrayal that, according to Andrew Tyler, director of Animal Aid, reflects 10 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism the British public’s mentality that ‘the only good squirrel is a red squirrel’. 23 An entry on the internet blog of a self-described ‘Tennessee expat and long term London resident’ reflects on the pervasive feeling that the grey is UK Public Enemy Number One. The immediate prompt was the Great Squirrel Debate in the House of Lords on 23 March 2006. At that time, Americans who had been living in London for years were reporting their first abusive treatment, whether or not they voted for Bush or supported the invasion of Iraq. As a twenty-nine-year old woman exclaimed: ‘some people just fly off the handle without even talking to me – it’s as if they had been waiting to run into an American all day to let their feelings out’. Within this hostile climate of opinion, the Tennessean wondered whether the assault on the grey squirrel was a ‘further sign of rampant anti-Americanism among the British elite’. 24 For some analysts, the only genuine sort of anti-Americanism is that of the ruling classes. 25 They dismiss ‘popular’ anti-Americanism as a sporadic, non-systemic phenomenon. Yet the grey squirrel arguably serves as a common enemy against which Brits from all walks of life can unite. A feature in the New York Times (2006) about inter-national couples profiled an American woman and her British husband who live in London. Whereas her staunchly Anglophile family readily accepted her British fiancé, her future mother-in-law made a point, at their first meeting, of bringing to her attention the ‘awful American gray squirrels’ that were ‘chasing all the lovely English red squirrels out of Britain’ – a reaction the daughter-in-law attributed to reflexive anti-Americanism (until she read up about the grey’s exploits). 26 Another strategy in the campaign against the grey is arguably less vulnerable to accusations of knee-jerk anti-Americanism. Those who position themselves as pro-red rather than anti-grey package their cause as part of a broader effort – a broader effort to preserve national and regional distinctiveness and to protect embattled minorities in a world of rampant globalization. A pro-red stance therefore entails the same commitment to the survival of local heritage, community identity and the ethos of diversity that invests the championing of local cheeses and apples against the tasteless universalism of international agribusiness. Grey squirrels are like Red Delicious apples - examples of the new age of the Homogenocene, toxic to gastronomic, cultural, and ecological pluralism. Meanwhile, red squirrels are like tasty local cheeses with names like Stinking Bishop, or Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 11 rare apple varieties with equally peculiar names like Polly Whitehair and Bloody Ploughman. Grey squirrels are like Granny Smiths from Chile and McDonald hamburgers from cattle raised in former Brazilian rainforest: symbols of tasteless, imperious universalism. In this respect, anti-grey squirrel sentiment is as much about anti-globalization as anti-Americanism (or, at least, American-led globalization). Is anti-Americanism primarily a conservative trait, as suggested by the aforementioned Tennessee expat, or essentially a feature of the British left? A few years ago, there was an article in The Spectator, a conservative British magazine, about the plucky reappearance in London of the tea shop, amidst the sprawling American empire of a coffee shop chain. The author who happened to be a former student of mine (though I taught him long before I became obsessed with squirrels) – confessed that Starbucks is ‘liable to bring out unworthy feelings of anti-Americanism in me’. Casting around for an evocative analogy, he portrayed Starbucks as ‘the Yankee grey squirrel of the high street, which has reduced our native tea and coffee shops to a few redoubts in the North’. 27 Debates about American bio-villains are riddled with anthropomorphism of this stripe. The most familiar critical device, unsurprisingly, is to humanize these non-humans through analogy with a ‘friendly invasion’. The invasion in question is not that of the rich American heiresses in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, which – as Simon Jenkins explained in 2010 in the 15th Annual Douglas W Bryant Lecture at the Eccles Centre for American Studies at the British Library – fuelled a bout of anti-American hysteria in the British press. 28 I am referring to the influx of US troops during World War Two: 3 million in total between January 1942 and December 1945. GIs stationed in Britain were famously described as ‘oversexed, overpaid, overfed, and over here’.29 As you all know, this celebrated cliché encapsulated the envy and resentment of British males toward strapping, ebullient American servicemen. Bearing gifts of nylon stockings, lipstick, chocolate, cigarettes and chewing gum, they undoubtedly enjoyed a huge advantage in the mating game. Permit me two quick asides at this point! GIs may have been overfed. But some who hailed from the backwoods of the eastern seaboard nevertheless craved an authentic taste of home – so much so that they were willing to offer top dollar – as much as five shillings – for a grey squirrel. The grey 12 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism squirrel was a popular game animal on the east coast and in parts of Appalachia squirrel brain was a particular delicacy. 30 Meanwhile, wartime Britons boiled up grey squirrel for dog food. 31 And while on the subject of dogs, I recently discovered the collection of articles that John Steinbeck wrote while serving as the New York Herald Tribune’s special correspondent in Europe in 1943. In one despatch from England, he reflected on the GIs’ habit of planting vegetable gardens on the edges of airfields and barracks. What they really wanted to grow were green corn, peppers and tomatoes – not the puny, hard little English tomatoes, but big American beefsteak tomatoes bursting with juice and vitality – like themselves. They even tried raising water melons and cantaloupes. The cool and damp English summer soon brought them down to earth, however, and they resigned themselves to raising peas, potatoes, cabbages, carrots and turnips. No danger of horticultural imperialism in reverse. With wicked brilliance, Steinbeck reflected on the deep English fear of vegetables – unless, that is, or, should I say, until, they are boiled to death – safely reduced to grey sludge. Here is the sentiment that concluded this particular letter to America: ‘It is strange to an American that the English, who love dogs and rarely eat them, nevertheless are brutal to vegetables. It is just one of those national differences that are unfathomable’.32 For some students of anti-Americanism, the ‘over here’ variety exemplifies the largely benign and jocular popular form. 33 I think it has more bite. The phrase is certainly no innocuous relic. It has proved highly adaptable, surviving the post-Cold War closure of US bases in Britain. A major reason for its retention of cultural currency is surely the robust condition of transplanted species such as the grey squirrel and the regular arrival of vibrant new species. The transfer of the phrase from people to animals has been almost effortless. The richness of existing associations has made the ‘over here’ phrase a weapon of choice in the rhetorical arsenal of environmental managers. According to an Environment Agency press release, the signal crayfish and mink are ‘over sized, over sexed and over here’, from the standpoint of white-clawed crayfish and water vole (2006). 34 This practice echoes that particular strand of anti-Americanism that focuses on national character traits, portraying Americans as cocksure, vulgar, unrestrained and overly competitive. 35 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 13 6. Conclusion: Squirrels and the Special Relationship How seriously should we take the language of anti-Americanism that colours British expressions of hostility to the grey squirrel? How closely do responses to American animals mirror attitudes to Americans and the activities of the US government? We can chart the peaks and troughs of recent anti-Americanism in Britain with some degree of accuracy. We obviously need to distinguish between disapproval of specific US policies and widely held favourable opinion of the United States in general. It is entirely possible to be both anti-American and pro-America. With this caveat in mind, the Vietnam War nonetheless represents a fairly unambiguous high point of hostile sentiment.36 Then, during the Clinton presidency (1992-2000), the profile of anti-Americanism was comparatively low. This was certainly the verdict in the late 1990s of the British journalist and historian, Paul Johnson, a Mancunian who was a great admirer of the United States. In the 1960s, Johnson edited the New Statesman, but swung to the Thatcherite right in the late 1970s and began writing for The Spectator. In 2006, he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian award, alongside B B King and historian David McCullough, author of two Pulitzer Prize winning biographies – on Harry Truman and John Adams.37 In 1997, Johnson toured Britain to promote his mammoth, thousand-page epic survey, A History of the American People. On that tour, he encountered minimal anti-Americanism. He was delighted to report that ‘overpaid, over-sexed and over here’ was no more than a ‘historical curiosity’, incomprehensible to Britons under the age of forty.38 Johnson’s verdict on the imminent demise of anti-Americanism in Britain proved to be premature. The Bush presidency and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq precipitated a powerful resurgence. Yet this particularly virulent most recent strain does not explain the high degree of hostility to the grey squirrel over the past decade. It is of course tempting to conclude that British attitudes to the grey squirrel tell us as much about perceptions of Americans and America as they do about the creature’s actual exploits. The independent existence that the hegemonic British view of the grey squirrel seems to possess fits with the main thrust of recent studies of anti-Americanism in Europe, which contends that the phenomenon is an overall orientation with deep and extensive cultural and ideological roots, possessing its own momentum (endemic), rather than a 14 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism response tailored to specific events and policies (circumstantial).39 Back in 1952, political scientist Milton Graham distinguished between hard core and soft core anti-Americanism, identifying the former as ‘sizable group… that can be expected to be anti-American at all times’.40 Insofar as a ‘hard core’ of anti-Americanism does exist, then perhaps it exists with reference to the grey squirrel. At the risk of aligning myself with the Fox News channel host, John Gibson, who refers to ‘Hating America’, post-September 11, as the ‘new world sport’41, I am a strong believer in the role of antiAmericanism as a recreational phenomenon, a pursuit (by no means ‘soft’) that fulfils a deep psychological need, involving the release of tension rather than the search for a solution. Still, in the final reckoning, what grey squirrels do matters as much as what they stand for. According to research conducted recently for the English, Welsh and Scottish governments, the grey squirrel ranks tenth on the list of costliest invasive species from an economic standpoint.42 The rodent barks trees, preys on garden plants, digs up bulbs, raids bird’s nests, and chews telephone wires and electric cables. This animal so readily conflated with human Americans displays in bucketfuls that American quality that Paul Johnson so greatly admired: ‘obstinate individualism’.43 Above all, though, its presence is resented because it is blamed for the red squirrel’s marginalized status. The grey squirrel has become a furry embodiment of rapacious US multinationals and chauvinistic US foreign policy. But I suspect that, because of the continuing decline in red squirrel numbers and the perceived connection with the grey squirrel’s undaunted expansion, it would be almost as unpopular if Al Gore or John Kerry had become president in 2000 or 2004.44 It is a boisterous creature with a sense of entitlement – a trait that some, not least the American woman in the audience during my lecture, even interpret as an arrogant streak – that acts as if it owns the world. Having said that, the language of criticism would surely have been far less racy if Walmart and Starbucks had never crossed the Atlantic. Anti-grey squirrel rhetoric is resolutely predictable, with enduring points of reference. At the British Association for American Studies (BAAS) AGM meeting an hour before this lecture, BAAS chair Martin Halliwell noted the most welcome ‘Obama Bounce’ that had boosted application rates for American Studies degree courses following the Bush slump. As yet, there is no evidence that Obama’s popularity in Britain has rubbed off on these Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 15 grey bêtes noires. To adapt a line from Cohan’s ‘Over There’, ‘The Yanks Have Come’. And, however much we may regret this, they are here to stay. So is this creature fated to remain forever American in the British mental and physical landscape? Finally, at the end of the day, bear in mind that, overall, the official course of British-American relations has continued to run more or less smoothly, unruffled by any number of allusions to brash, unbridled and super-sized beastly American beasts. And I daresay that they will continue to do so. I am basing this confidence partly on a reverse example: an incident involving a British animal, previously mentioned, over there. The strength of American antipathy toward the ‘Cockney’ sparrow in the late nineteenth century did not escape the notice of the British consul in Baltimore. In fact, he thought it was a sufficiently serious matter to bring to the attention of the Foreign Secretary (the Marquis of Salisbury) the ‘universal’ if largely unfounded ‘ill-will’ toward the bird. But there was nothing in the consular records at Kew to suggest any follow up action.45 I am also basing my confidence on the stance of Prime Minister Harold Macmillan (1957-63). I paid a second visit to the National Archives in Kew in the autumn of 2011, a time of year when the grey squirrels were particularly vivacious in the woods fringing the Thames and in nearby Kew Gardens. This time, I wanted to consult the records of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (MAF). Macmillan, a countryman with a large estate in Sussex, was mightily exercised by grey squirrels and badgered his secretaries of agriculture with memos complaining that they were “swarming again”, demanding to know “what are you doing about grey squirrels?”46 But Macmillan’s fixation on a squirrel that was in Britain but not of Britain did not prevent the repairing of British-American relations after the rift over Suez, nor spoil his congenial relations with Eisenhower and Kennedy. 16 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism Notes 1.Alfred W Crosby, Ecological Imperialism; The Biological Expansion of Europe, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1986. 2.Alfred W Crosby, The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492, Westport, CT, Greenwood Press, p. 211. 3.Ernest Thompson Seton, ‘A Street Troubador: Being the Adventures of a Cock Sparrow’, in Lives of the Hunted, New York, Charles Scribner’s, 1901, p. 125; Peter Coates, ‘Eastenders Go West: English Sparrows, Immigrants, and the Nature of Fear’, Journal of American Studies, 39 (2005), pp. 447, 451. 4.John MacKenzie, ‘Editorial’, Environment and History, 7/3 (2001), p. 253. 5.Claude Levi-Strauss, Totemism, trans. Rodney Needham, London, 1964 [1962]), p. 89. Widespread use has adapted the phrase to read ‘good to think with’. 6.These studies include Ziauddin Sardar and Merryl Wyn Davies, Why Do People Hate America?, London, Icon Books, 2003; J F Revel, Anti-Americanism, London: Encounter Books, 2004; Alexander Stephan, ed., The Americanization of Europe: Culture, Diplomacy and Anti-Americanism, New York: Berghahn Books, 2005; Denis Lacorne and Tony Judt, With Us or Against Us: Studies in Global Anti-Americanism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian, 2006; Andrei S Markovits, Uncouth Nation: Why Europe Dislikes America, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2007); Russell A Berman, Anti-Americanism in Europe: A Cultural Problem, Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 2008. 7.William J Lederer and Eugene Burdick, The Ugly American, New York: W.W. Norton, 1999 [1958]), p. 145. 8.Lee John Barnes, quoted in George Monbiot, ‘How British Nationalists got their Claws into my Crayfish’, The Guardian, 1 October 2009, at www.guardian.co.uk/ environment/georgemonbiot/2009/oct/01/crayfish-bnp 9.Though the adoption of organochlorine pesticides (dieldrin and aldrin) for sheep dipping and seed dressing from 1955 was arguably a more important cause of the precipitous decline in otter numbers during the mid-1950s, the otter’s disappearance undoubtedly assisted the mink’s spread. On the Western Isles of Scotland, a five-year eradication campaign was successfully concluded in 2001. 10.Jackie C Horne and Donna R White, eds, Kenneth Grahame’s The Wind in the Willows: A Children’s Classic at 100, Lanham, MD, Scarecrow Press, 2010, xx. 11.A D Middleton, ‘The Ecology of the American Grey Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis Gmelin) in the British Isles’, Proceedings of the General Meetings for Scientific Business of the Zoological Society of London, 54/2, 1930, pp. 812, 837. 839; A D Middleton, The Grey Squirrel: The Introduction and Spread of the Grey Squirrel in the British Isles, London, Sidgwick & Jackson, v, pp. 1-2, 7, 9, 71-75. 12.Middleton, The Grey Squirrel, p. 1. Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 17 13.Is there a special relationship between American animals and the British? As a general rule, in the absence of fraught relations between the country of origin and the host nation, the debate about an invasive species is likely to operate within much stricter economic and ecological parameters. There is far less mileage in criticizing a North American grey squirrel, let alone a Canadian grey squirrel. Apart from those that hail from North America, most invasive species in Britain currently derive from Asia. So it is not possible to compare responses to American invasive species with attitudes to organisms from European countries with which Britain has often experienced rough relations, such as France and Germany. 14.H B Wyatt, ‘On the American Grey Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in the British Isles’, The Essex Naturalist, 20 (1932), pp. 189-205. 15.Hilda Kean, ‘Imagining Rabbits and Squirrels in the English Countryside’, Society & Animals, 9/2 (2001), p. 164 16.A Tittensor, ‘What Future for the Reds?’, Country Life, 166/4292 (25 October 1979), pp. 1394-95. 17. H ansard (Lords), 25 March 1998, Session 1997-98, 587, Column 1318, www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199798/ldhansrd/vo980325/text/ 80325-10.htm#80325-10_head0 18. H ansard (Lords). 23 March 2006, Session 2005-200, 680, Column 362, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldhansrd/vo060323/text/60323-04. htm#60323-04_head1 19.Milton D Graham, ‘Anti-Americanism, British Garden Variety’, Antioch Review 12/2 (Summer 1952), p. 221; Paul Hollander, Anti-Americanism: Irrational and Rational, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers, 2003 [1995], p. 410; Jessica C E GienowHecht, ‘Always Blame the Americans: Anti-Americanism in Europe in the Twentieth Century’, American Historical Review, 111/4 (October 2006), p. 1069. 20.Various restaurants of repute have started to include grey squirrel on their menus. See Linzi Watson, ‘Game Dealer rustles up recipe for red squirrel conservation’, Cumberland News, 17 October 2008; Nigel Burnham, ‘Eating the enemy’, The Guardian, 18 March 2009. 21. www.channel4.com/programmes/squirrel-wars-red-vs-grey 22.Woodrow Wyatt, The Further Adventures of Mr. Saucy Squirrel, London, G. Allen & Unwin, 1977, pp. 78-80. Wyatt’s daughter, Petronella – to whom this and his earlier squirrel book, The Exploits of Mr Saucy Squirrel (1976) is dedicated, puts the case for accepting the grey squirrel in ‘The Red and the Grey,’ The Spectator, 287/9047, 29 December, 2001, p. 49. 23. Interview, BBC Radio 4, 29 January 2001. 24.‘Anti-Americanism “feels like racism”’, BBC News, 16 April 2006, at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4881474.stm; ‘The Vol Abroad’, ‘Squirrelly Lawmakers’, at http://thevolabroad.wordpress.com/2006/03/24/squirrelly-lawmakers/ 18 Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 25.Herbert J Spiro, ‘Anti-Americanism in Western Europe’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 497 (May 1988), p. 124. 26.S Emling, ‘Meet the Family: Complexity and Stress at Holiday Time’, New York Times, 10 January 2006. 27.George Trefgarne, ‘Is it Time for Tea?’, The Spectator, 303 (20 January 2007), p. 65. 28.Simon Jenkins, ‘Anti-Americanism in the 21st Century’, The British Library, 17 May 2010, The Fifteenth Annual Douglas W. Bryant Lecture under the Auspices of The Eccles Centre for American Studies, p. 1. 29.David Reynolds, Rich Relations: The American Occupation of Britain, 1942-1945, London, HarperCollins, 1995, xxiii. The inspiration for this phrase (also popular in Australia and usually attributed to the British war-time entertainer, Tommy Trinder, though his role was probably that of popularizer rather than originator) was the song, ‘Over There’, which George M Cohan wrote shortly after the American declaration of war on Germany in April 1917. ‘Over Here!’ is a 1974 Broadway musical by the Sherman brothers, about a rail journey across the US during World War Two. The GIs, in turn, described the British as ‘underpaid, undersexed and under Eisenhower.’ 30.Oxford University squirrel researcher Monica Shorten – a keen consumer of squirrel pie and fried squirrel - reports that American and Canadian GIs were prepared to pay up to five shillings a head: Shorten, Squirrels, London, Collins, 1954, p. 58. 31. Stephen Tallents, letter to the editor, The Times, 2 December 1946. 32.John Steinbeck, ‘Growing Vegetables’ (15 July 1943), in Once There Was a War, London, Penguin Classics, 2007 [1958], pp. 71-74. 33. Spiro, ‘Anti-Americanism in Western Europe’, p. 124. 34.Environment Agency, ‘Top Ten Most Wanted Foreign Species’, 3 August 2006, www.environment-agency.gov.uk/news/1444976 35.Milton D Graham, ‘Anti-Americanism, British Garden Variety’, Antioch Review 12/2 (Summer 1952), pp. 217-28; W. T. Stead, The Americanization of the World, or, The Trend of the Twentieth Century, New York, Horace Markley, 1901, pp. 334, 442-44. Nowadays, the unsavoury qualities of being loud and crude (as well as lewd and inebriated) are just as if not more likely to be qualities that American commentators associate with Brits. 36.Bear in mind, though, that opinion polls involving fifteen nations that registered strong general disapproval of US policies in Vietnam also indicated a widely held favourable opinion of the United States in general: Leo P Crespi, ‘West European Perceptions of the United States’, Political Psychology 4/4 (December 1983), p. 720. 37.As an environmental historian currently working on rivers, I note that McCullough’s first book (1968) was about the Johnstown Flood of 1889, when the South Fork Dam burst on the Little Conemaugh River. 38.Paul Johnson, ‘The Decline and Fall of Anti-Americanism in Britain’, The Spectator, 279 (1 November 1997), p. 30. Red and Grey: Towards a Natural History of British Anti-Americanism 19 39.Rob Kroes, ‘European Anti-Americanism: What’s New?’, Journal of American History 93/2 (September 2006), pp. 417-31. 40.Rob Kroes, ‘European Anti-Americanism: What’s New?’, Journal of American History 93/2 (September 2006): 417-31. 41.John Gibson, Hating America: The New World Sport, New York, William Morrow, 2004. 42.James Meikle, ‘Rabbits Named Britain’s Most Costly Invasive Species’, The Guardian, 15 December 2010. 43.Paul Johnson, A History of the American People, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1997, p. 65. 44.The continuing success of the grey squirrel and other species like the signal crayfish is unconnected to the global advance of American military and economic might. These animals possess their own agency and momentum. Yet is also worth remembering that fortunes decline as well as rise. As the otter stages a comeback in Britain, thanks to cleaner rivers, there are signs that American mink are in retreat. 45.W F Segrave to the Marquis of Salisbury, 23 August 1889, Reports, Consuls General at New York, Baltimore, Boston, Charleston, Diplomatic, Consular, Commercial and Treaty,1889, FO 5/2060, National Archives (Public Record Office), Kew, Richmond, UK (NA). 46.Harold Macmillan, 3 January, 29 February and 15 August 1960, PREM 11/3196, MAF, NA. Eccles Centre for American Studies Plenary Lectures at the British Association for American Studies Anual Conference 2004‘Maybe Nothing Ever Happens Once And Is Finished’: Some Notes on Recent Southern Fiction and Social Change, by Richard J Gray 2005Evaluating the Foreign Policy of President Clinton – Or, Bill Clinton Between the Bushes, by John Dumbrell 2006At Home at the Wheel? The Woman and her Automobile in the 1950s, by Maggie Walsh 2007Postmodernism vs. Evangelical Religion in Post-1960s America, by Richard King 2008 John Cage Was All The Rage, by Peter Dickinson 2009The Special Relationship: What Does America Teach Us About Ourselves?, by Janet Beer and John Snow 2010‘America, Empire Of Liberty’ And The Challenges Of ‘Popular’ History, by David Reynolds 2011The First Financial Crisis of the Twenty-First Century: Lessons for America, by Nigel Bowles THE ECCLES CENTRE was founded by David and Mary Eccles in 1991. Based at the British Library – which houses one of the world’s foremost collections of American books, manuscripts, journals, newspapers and sound recordings – the Centre has two broad aims: to increase awareness and use of the Library’s North American holdings, and to promote and support the study of North America in schools and universities in the United Kingdom. The Centre’s programme includes lectures, conferences, concerts, seminars, teacher and student events and web based study resources. The Centre works in co-operation with the Library’s American curatorial team, with members of the American Studies community in the UK, and with other partners interested in the advancement of knowledge about America. The focus of the Eccles Centre is on North America, in particular the US and Canada, but can extend to include the hemispheric, comparative and international topics in which the US and Canada play a major part. Full details of the Eccles Centre’s programme can be found at www.bl.uk/ecclescentre
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz