Physics at Court Galileo’s New Sciences Galilean relic in Florence Institute and Museum of the History of Science Galileo as “mathematician & philosopher” The chief works – – – – Operations of the Geometrical & Military Compass, 1606 Starry Messenger, 1610 Dialogue on the World Systems, 1632 Two New Sciences, 1638 New persona as natural philosopher Saint Martyr Entrepreneur – Founding member of Academy of the Lynxes Publicist, polemicist and courtier – Earliest use of vernacular in European science Task of lecture Galileo as a public Copernican Galileo’s kinematics of motion Early challenges to Aristotle The law of free fall Circular inertia Projectile motion Another conservative revolutionary? Delayed responses to Copernicus’s heliocentrism Wittenberg Intepretation of De rev Osiander preface Computational tool, not cosmology Only 10 authors discussed heliocentrism by 1600, only 2 converts (Mästlin and Kepler) De rev on Catholic Index in 1616 Must correct (not ban) the book Galileo as closet Copernican, 1595 Double motion of earth causes tides by sloshing the oceans; high tides when rotations in “same” direction, low tides when rotations in “opposite” directions Galileo as public Copernican Invention of the telescope, 1608 Patent request by Dutch spectacle-maker, Lipperhey Galileo’s telescopic discoveries, 1609-10 – – – – Earth-like moon New stars not reported by ancients Satellites of Juptier (“Medicean stars”) Phases of Venus Ignored physics problems of heliocentrism – What moves the planets? – Why do bodies on earth fall “down” and not toward center of cosmos? Galileo’s telescope Institute and Museum of the History of Science, Florence Ghirlandaio, St. Jerome, fresco in Church of Ognissanti, Florence, 1480 Contra Aristotle on motion (kinematics) Galileo’s early anti-Aristotelianism – Empirical experimentation, not just logic – “The language of nature is mathematics” Law of pendulum--Pisa cathedral – Period independent of amplitude, weight Falling bodies--Pisa tower – Time of fall independent of weight – But if Aristotle is wrong, what is the correct law of falling bodies? Galileo’s law of free fall Medieval definitions (from “latitude of forms”) V = ΔD/Δt (“change in distance/change in time”) a = ΔV/Δt = (Vf - Vi)/Δt If Vi = 0, then a = Vf/t, or Vf = at Galileo’s “thought experiments” Uniform motion: D = VT Uniformly nonuniform motion D = (1/2)Vft [Merton College Rule!] = (1/2)at2 Galileo’s inclined plane experiments Is free fall a uniform acceleration? Two set-ups (keep time or distance intervals fixed) Galileo’s lab report (a C-?) Manuscript T2 T D 1 4 9 16 25 36 49 64 Ms. Gal. 72, f. 107v, from http://galileo.imss.firenze.it/ms72/INDEX.HTM [33T2] 1 33 33 2 130 132 3 298 297 4 526 528 5 824 825 6 1192 1188 7 1620 1617 8 2104 2112 Measured D is proportional to T2! Galileo’s law of “inertia” Another thought experiment – Motion accelerates down inclined plane – Motion decelerates up inclined plane – Motion unchanged on horizontal plane BUT “horizontal” means circular at earth’s surface Thus, Galilean “inertia” is circular – Aristotle’s circles remain – Galileo also rejected Kepler’s ellipses Projectile motion (impetus + Aristotle) Projectile motion (Galileo) Separate into horizontal (constant v) (accelerated) and vertical components Example of horizontal projectile Cannon Dh Dv Dh = VT Dv = 1/2at2 Cannonball Galileo’s contributions Kinematics rather than dynamics Quantitative description of terrestrial motion Forces (Aristotle’s “causes”) are never discussed Combined thought and actual experiments Used latter to confirm former, unlike Aristotle Another cautious revolutionary? Preserves Aristotelian circles Preserves Platonic belief in number as basis of cosmos But provoked controversy with Church; not as cautious as Copernicus Wrote in vernacular; physics for court, not just university audiences
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz