MOTION TO GRAVITY
By: Leonard Van Zanten
Abstract
Untold many words and essays have been written on the nature of gravity – all
of them without success. All because it was not for man to discover the pillars upon
which the earth rests, nor how its foundations are laid. If any man came forth of
himself claiming to have discovered the nature of gravity, he would be the death of all
mankind. The reference to this is by Jeremiah chapter 31, verse 37. Yet again it is
written, how shortly before the return of the Son of God the foundations of the earth
would be understood. (Esdras 6:10) And so they must be.
This essay then is but an introduction to the cause in gravity.
Key words
Gravity. Motion. Magnetism. Augmentation.
Essay
Who now am I as a lowly person with no formal education in man’s schools of
physics that I should know what no other man educated in man’s schools has an
inkling of? Am I therefore to reveal myself, to lay myself bare before the eyes of the
world? My reply is that I have no choice in the matter. It was once before, some 20
plus years ago that I furnished the world of science with the facts concerning gravity,
only to receive an angry reply, in; “How dare you send such info to us.”
But why were they angry? If my essay was of no value - why the anger? May it
be because they were unable to disprove the simplicity of my speech? Another
editor of a scientific journal replied concerning another one of my essay’s that it;
“Was excellent, but if she were to publish it, she would lose all her customers.”
Why therefore am I cast into a world in which there is no place for me? For the
knowledge granted me I simply do not fit in, and yet am to speak as I must, for unto
that end did I come into this exile.
But why am I speaking all such words so strange and unbecoming to the sons of
man, and not rather get right to the issue at hand? It my dear fellow man is to duly
inform everyone reading this essay that its knowledge and discovery is not of me.
That no, I did not discover the foundations of the earth, nor therefore will I be to the
death of all men. But then I forgot, or did I, - that most men in the sciences do not
believe in a Creator. These rather fool themselves as if all this intricate beauty just fell
together by accident. But how was it that someone said; “To construct a great
cathedral requires a lot more information than to create rubble of rocks and
stone. And that natural processes always proceed to reduce cathedrals to
rubble?" How therefore man defeats himself not to recognize a forest for its trees.
Let us then proceed with our issue – how the revelation to this knowledge was
awarded me some thirty seven years ago, the Almighty Creator granting me wisdom
and understanding in this and many other things. In all my days, to me physics is but
like a toy to play with at my leisure. And as the years progressed I wrote a number of
pages refining the explanations in an attempt to make it simpler and simpler for men
to understand. And even this day it is so.
If then at end one will come to say: "O but that is so obvious, even a caveman could have realized that for himself.” And, yes, why then did we not realize
this for ourselves so long ago? It is the pride in man whereby some will come to say
that they knew this all along, but with it they shall be liars. Nor am I alone to proclaim
this all-alluring fact. I now hope in vivid terms to show how man had in fact
formulated a law for himself that clearly showed the nature and cause of gravity. And
yet - for all its precious value - no man was able to read that writing on the wall,
not even Sir Isaac Newton himself who wrote it.
GRAVITY: AND DEFYING GRAVITY
Figure 1 illustrates the direction of gravity as we know it on earth, it can be a
rocket in space, or anyone or anything on the earth. Then by figure 2, as we let go of
a stone out of our hand it is by gravity that it falls.
So far so good, then let us look what will be contrary to gravity, as in to defy
gravity?
First by figure 3, there is that familiar spinning top that seems to defy gravity,
but only as long as it spins, which is to say, as long as it is in motion.
Next, by figure 4, as the stone is thrown for some distance, it, just like the
spinning top, also seems to defy gravity staying in the air for the period of its
trajectory. This came about because we added movement to the stone, just the same
as we added movement to the top. In the one it was an angular movement, while
with the stone it was a linear movement.
Shall we now go into the specifics of how and why the stone stayed in the air
longer than if it were simply dropped? Or a bullet why it can travel so far before
gravity will arrest it? We don't want to do this since all that has been defined. And so
let us stick with gravity, and by what possible phenomena in nature that gravity may
be "affected," and/or be in "defiance" of.
We now for an answer to our quest just saw two very obvious examples by
which gravity may be affected, as well as effected. That phenomenon is "Motion,"
as in movement. And so - have you now got it? Did it register? Did it really get
through to you? Or are you still wondering?
All right, let's put it another way. Here you have gravity! Right? And now with
nothing more than "movement" you are affecting that gravity to diminish it, and/or
as we say; defy it.
So then if gravity can be affected and effected by movement, these two
factors must have a very close relation to one another. Is that not so?
Does it now register? If not, do you see that man and woman there how these
are embracing and kissing each other?
Sure you see them! Would you now conclude that these two are perfect
strangers to each other, one having nothing at all to do with the other in any kind of
relation? Or would you conclude them to be husband and wife, the essence of a
single entity in the format of two?
Come now don't be difficult, utilize common sense, with a bit of logic if you
will. The faster the motion - the more it will effect, or as we might say, "implore"
itself upon gravity. For this also we have seen as an absolute fact how with faster
movement we can completely outrun gravity.
For that is how we get the space shuttle and the satellites up there above our
heads. And when we taper down the speed of our movement so that we come even
with the factor of gravity, (Factor - meaning the amount of pull it can exert at any
altitude,) our space vehicles safely remain in orbit around us.
We do not want to go into any mathematics here, since we are looking for a
cause, and wish to observe relations, the simple relevance of one factor to
another. (If we wish to see mathematics there is another essay entitled; “Limits on
Gravity.”)
For it is not only that gravity is affected by movement, but as I have shown -it lies at the very heart thereof.
And why should it not be motion, since everything else in nature is by
motion. Even for you to read these words here, if the atoms in the black of the letters
were not having movement within themselves, they would not be able to remit to your
eyes the specific wavelengths that correspond to that color, be it black, blue, red, or
whatever shade of color.
And why are we not falling into the sun? That also is because of movement,
our 15-km/sec velocity through space. And why is it that when we touch upon a
magnetic field we are not getting (as it is called) a jolt? Yet when we touch upon both
ends of a rotating magnetic field we will get a jolt! And so why is that? It is
because of movement. It is a moving field and a rotating field to drill holes into
your skin if you take both ends at once. Whereas with the regular magnet it was a
stationary field, and just as a drill-bit does not make a hole unless it turns even
so a regular magnetic field won't make a hole.
Everything in nature is - of - and in - as well as - by motion. A gallon of
water when it is turned into steam takes up a lot more space than the cube of a gallon
all because the increase in movement drives the molecules further from one another.
And why does the engine in your car run? It is because burning gasoline is nothing
more than movement producing a greater movement, atoms and molecules
demanding more room for themselves that pushes down the cylinders.
Movement thus in it’s various ways effects many various things. The light of
the sun as it turns its way through space, or through our air finds no obstructions, but
in entering upon the molecules of water there are those two hydrogen atoms
blocking the path of the light as it attempts to pass these nicely rounded designs of
the Oxygen atoms.
My question now is, if my reader did get the picture, that by simply looking
at a stone being thrown through the air - in comparison to that same stone being
dropped? And that top to remain upright for as long as it continues to spin - how
movement shows itself to be so relevant to that phenomenon we call gravity?
I know how I have said that correlation of many factors to a single issue is not
the best side of man, but it are but two or three things here to correlate. And why then
should it be so difficult? Am I perhaps being unfair in making these statements when
I know so well as to why and how it was that no one was able to add these things to a
single outcome?
And so let us proceed to that law of motion that reads. "The gravitational
force of a particle in uniform circular motion is proportional to the square of its
speed and inversely proportional to the radius of its path.”
How about reading that sentence a thousand times over, or a million, will it then
register upon us for what in fact it states and implies? No it will not, for it has been
read and written that and more times, and even Newton who wrote it, himself only
saw it for its inertia, be it inward or away from a vector, with its obvious implication
not registering upon him. Nor is this something new for the same thing happened at
least twice before. Once, when a hand in a Persian land wrote on the wall the demise
of its king, for which Daniel had to be called out, so that the Lord might translate the
same. The other time was with the M & M experiment, how these two men were
neither able to read the writing on their wall, but no one came to their aid for any
translation, until the Lord caused me to have my dwelling in this world.
The implication of the above law now are its own very words. Taking the red
color words it reads; "Gravitational - is - motion." Because it states that: "Gravity
is equal to a, or the, degree of movement." And so Newton might have thought.
"Okay, now I know gravity for its force how it equals inertia." But the man should
equally have realized how that same inertia can also overcome, or outrun gravity, or
how else is it to go upwards? And by the same token he should have surmised that -for one to so affect the other - there must be a common cause.
Since then the man wrote an altogether different law for gravity that is
altogether wrong, the writing on the wall for his good law did not appear to him, and I
had to be send of the Lord to his aid. Or might we say that Isaac Newton practiced
what is called a "snow-job" on mankind? How, since his second law of motion
clearly defined the cause to gravity, he wrote a third law to confuse everyone, to fool
them into thinking that it was elsewhere?
It is obvious however how Newton himself did not really understand his own
written law rather than practicing a hoax. Nor has anyone else since truly understood
his laws of motion. For when we consider the term "weight" as a measure of gravity
we discovered how there was yet more writing on that wall, which no man was able
to decipher.
Weight, as it is said. "Is a measure of gravitational force." And it was said
that; "The definition of weight is a direct result of Newton's second law." These
simple accepted facts then makes most of mankind out for thieves, since obviously
the force of gravity not being the same all around the earth, weight likewise varied.
And when one buys a pound of grain in Canada, he will get less for his money than
one would in Mexico. This is not an idiom, but a plain fact, and if not so - to assert
that we are honest, by weight remaining the same all around the world, we are most
cock-eyed to adhere ourselves to two statement in direct contradiction of one
another.
"A writing on the wall," so I said. Or is it simply that man is poor in
correlation? It then was a writing on the wall, and man "indeed" was poor in
correlating one factor from another. But this so I must admit was not purely
accidental, but quite by design. For if man had the knowledge and the knack for
correlation as it has been awarded me, they would have it for their own death
sentence. And yes what a marvellous statement I have just made, a word in wisdom
for the wise. And should I now expand upon it seeing how it was a writing on the
wall that now at last should be brought into the open? Indeed I should, and it all boils
down to this, how neither the laws of motion nor of gravity were understood, and that
by design as well as inherit in man.
If we will make the statement that, "Weight is a direct result of Newton's law,
a measure of gravity," then weight is always greater at and near the equator verses
anywhere else on earth. Since at the equator one is obviously much further from the
vector to which gravity applies than anywhere else on earth.
Have I now at last flipped the switch for the light to dawn on us? If I have
as far as the measure of weight is concerned, then one must also realize how; it is, and was, - and always must be, - motion to effect the degree and measure of
gravity. A writing on the wall, yes, and man poor in correlation, both of which are
correct even as my statement is correct where I said, that; "It was by design." And
by now we ought to know how and why that was - to our own benefit mind you. So
then I should yet give us this to think about, how man is indeed prone to walk himself
over any cliff, yet his Maker softens his fall, for because he is without eyesight to
behold the cliff before him.
Augmenting, is the word I coined for the proper relation between these two
movement, one called inertia that comes about by speed and velocity, (speed in
angular, velocity in linear) with the other named gravity. For gravity in all respects is
a movement all the same, even as we describe it for movement, namely to say; "the
acceleration of gravity is so and so." Acceleration then not only means movement but is movement, - even as the pull that gravity seems to have on things is
movement. And that my dear friend is as movement upon movement. For just as a
propeller turns to move the ship, it is movement producing movement.
Gravity as such is not a force in itself; even as centrifugal is not a force in itself.
For the centrifugal it is merely the inertia of the media resisting the change in
direction. And, "Inertia" is itself nothing other than movement. Then for gravity,
when my wife tells me to drive the car, it is not her driving - but me taking the wheel
and where it should go.
Meaning, gravity is an inclination of movement entwining itself into the arms of
her man, him being the one and only true force in nature, since it, that man of her, by
name magnetic, is movement, and the grand coordinate of all movements.
Do not now blame Isaac Newton for failing to surmise what could have been
surmised, since equally so no one else did until the Lord the Almighty One taught me
whereby all the others might come to know that, which was ever so simple - was
also held a secret - and ever so secure a secret.
Nor was that the only simplicity held in secret from the sons of men. Or do you
suppose that this earth, or the new earth will have enough oil to last for all its
eternities? Do you have any idea how long eternity is? We been pumping oil for little
more than a century, and if we last for ten more, what is the number of eleven
centuries to the endless trillions of eons of millenniums that we will have to endure?
For even then there is no end, since forever is forever, meaning without end. But do
not look to me for an answer to your need for energy, seeing how in that respect I will
no longer answer.
Are we now wiser, now that we have stood at the rocky shore of a lake and
we threw some pebbles in it, realizing how yes, indeed the increase of movement
affected the gravity upon that pebble, wherefore it must certainly have some
relation to it, if not a very indelible relation -- much like a man with his woman
being not two, but one single entity in the format of two?
This sentence could not possibly have been written nor pronounced, nor taught
by any man to any man, for all the centuries of man. And shall I now again reiterate
the why not? This to me is like stone-age teaching; I do not think that I am able to
make it any simpler. The evidence is much too clear and too obvious to be mistaken
by any mind of man, unless God has left him to the spirits of deceit so that his
habitation may likewise be with them.
And yes it was God who withheld the simplicity of the foundations from
man. For a time anyway to let them wander in their own conceptions that by His
light unto them He might granulate and impress upon them how all knowledge is
indeed and in fact of Him, even as their skin, their bones, the very air they breathe,
as well as their very being is of Him, and Him alone.
If therefore O man you wish to exist and have being, acknowledge Him without
whose constant care you would not survive a single second. And not to believe me
in these words is as good as pronouncing your own sentence of death.
It is not only the foundations of the earth, which the Creator of all endowed
upon me, but how we are to live here and now as well as what will be in the future.
But such grand knowledge will not enter into everyone, since many will not accept
what is best for themselves. Look at it realistically, what a marvellous understanding
of His creation the Lord has given not only to me, but to all of us in comparison to the
folly that many have come up with, some of which I have labelled as outright lies.
Granted now that there are many good and excellent things known of him (man
that is) as well. Then look to see how all that is good came to him by his Creator
teaching him. For here again I am not the only one taught of Him. The farmer does
his work with excellence because God teaches him. And likewise with doctors, and
persons of all the trades how all these in many different ways received their
instruction imprinted upon them by the One who formed them in the first place.
But then comes the tricky part, not every one will acknowledge Him, not
everyone will admit to the truth. For since this world is under the power of a
wicked ruler, he managed to get more of us into his clutches than he should. And
how did that come about? Where did man go wrong? It is pride, and arrogance, for
a man to impute something into him that is not of him, but given him. And that my
friend is called ingratitude, as well as selfish pride.
CONCLUSION
Having read my words here do you not also think that it is about time for man to
wake up, to at long last get his act together and confess to the truth of things? Or will
you conclude that like Rembrandt and Leonardo De Vinci I likewise am centuries
ahead of my time. I then agree that it will be centuries before man will accept a new
foundation for the sciences.
The full detail in what gravity is and how it comes about may be found by pages
27, 28, 29, 39, 40. 54, 55, 58, 60, and 70.
(http://www.leonardswebpage.info/fw60.htm)
Leonard