11/19/2012 DAPT With the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent Dr. Sameh Shaheen MD, FESC, FSCAI Prof. of cardiology, Ain shams University The Egyptian Society of Cardiology The Working Group of Thrombosis & Hemostasis The 13th Annual Meeting of the WGTH 28th – 29th June 2012 / Intercontinental City Stars Hotel Evidence of safety from the XIENCE V Trials SE2932653 Rev A 1 11/19/2012 XIENCE – Low ST Rates Continue Beyond 1 Year XIENCE V demonstrated a low very late stent thrombosis (VLST) rate of 0.3% between 1 and 3 years in SPIRIT III. SPIRIT III Landmark Analysis: Very Late Stent Thrombosis Rates 12-Month Data: XIENCE V (0.9%), TAXUS (0.3%), p=0.63 Source: David Cox, SPIRIT III, 3-Year Results, Landmark Analysis, TCT 2009. TAXUS Express2 was the control in SPIRIT III. . Consistently Low Stent Thrombosis Rates at 2 Years Rate of Stent Thrombosis SPIRIT IV: 2-Year Stent Thrombosis (ARC Def/Prob) p=0.008 COMPARE: 2-Year Stent Thrombosis (ARC Def/Prob) 1.23% 66% p<0.0001* 0.42% XIENCE V N=2458 TAXUS N=1229 • Largest RCT between two DES to have presented primary endpoint data • 3,690 patients • Clinically-driven primary and secondary endpoints Source: G. Stone. SPIRIT IV 2-Year Results Presentation. TCT 2010. Source: P. Smits. COMPARE 2-Year Results Presentation. TCT 2010. • Investigator-sponsored, single-center, prospective RCT • 1,800 All Comer, real-world patients • 11% of XIENCE V patients and 15% of TAXUS patients on DAPT at 2 years *Log-rank test 2 11/19/2012 ISAR-TEST 4 ……2-Year EES vs. SES Definite Stent Thrombosis Independently-conducted, prospective randomized controlled trial 1,304 patients randomized 1:1(XIENCE: n=652, CYPHER: n=652) 1.4% Number of Events p=0.17 Late (30d-1y) Early (<30d) 0.6% Very late (>1y) Late (30d-1y) Primary Endpoint: Composite of Cardiac Death, TV-MI and TLR Early (<30d) XIENCE V CYPHER XIENCE V had no very late stent thrombosis Source: R. Byrne. ISAR Test 4 2-Year Results Presentation. TCT 2010. LESSON I 3-Year Definite Stent Thrombosis at 3 Years Late-breaking trial presented at ESC 2010 of XIENCE V vs. CYPHER Investigator-initiated, single center, independent study Propensity-matched, with 1342 patients enrolled in each arm Primary endpoint is a composite of Death, MI and TVR through 3 years XIENCE V demonstrates low stent thrombosis rates versus CYPHER Source: S. Windecker. LESSON I 3-Year Results. ESC 2010. 3 11/19/2012 Consistently Low Stent Thrombosis Rates in All-Comers. Trial After Trial. Stent Thrombosis Rates (ARC Definite) SORT-OUT IV LESSON I COMPARE RESOLUTE-AC p*<0.0001 2.7% p=0.01 p=0.01 1.6% p=0.05 1.2% 0.7% 0.5% 0.6% 0.3% 0.1% XIENCE V CYPHER XIENCE V CYPHER XIENCE V TAXUS XIENCE V RESOLUTE Liberté 9 Months 3 Years 2 Year 1 Year *Log-rank test Results from different clinical trials are not directly comparable. Information provided for educational purposes only. Source: L. Okkels Jensen. SORT OUT 4 9-Month Results Presentation. TCT 2010. Source: Serruys P et al. Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents. New Engl J Med. 2010; 363; 136-46. Source: P. Smits. COMPARE Two Year Results Presentation. TCT 2010. Source: S. Windecker. LESSON I 3 Year ResultsPresentation. ESC 2010. Palmerini T et al. Lancet 2012: Published On-line DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60324-9 49 RCTs; 50,844 pts 4 11/19/2012 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes With Drug-Eluting and BareMetal Coronary Stents: A Mixed-Treatment Comparison Analysis of 117 762 Patient-Years of Follow-Up From Randomized Trials Circulation. 2012;125:2873-2891 • From 76 randomized clinical trials with 117 762 patient-years of follow-up, compared with BMS, each DES reduced long-term target-vessel revascularization (39%–61%), but the magnitude varied by DES type (EES∼SES∼ZES-R>PES∼ZES>BMS), with a >42% probability that EES had the lowest target-vessel revascularization rate. • The safest DES appeared to be EES (>86% probability), with reduction in myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis compared with BMS. Do the safety results correlate with DAPT discontinuation? SE2932653 Rev A 5 11/19/2012 Consistently Low Stent Thrombosis Rates with Low DAPT Utilization COMPARE: 2-Year Stent Thrombosis (ARC Def/Prob) Early ST 92% pts on DAPT Late ST 70% pts on DAPT Very Late ST 13% pts on DAPT Source: P. Smits. COMPARE 2-Year Results Presentation. TCT 2010. Two year cumulative ARC def/prob ST according to DAPT interruption Pooled analysis of SPIRIT II,III,IV and COMPARE (n= 6789 pts) E. Kedhi, ACC2012 6 11/19/2012 XIENCE – 0% ST Observed After DAPT Interruption or Discontinuation at 6 Months in All Comers ARC Def/Prob ST Rates (30 Day – 1 Year) After DAPT Interruption in XIENCE V USA Source: Dr. James Hermiller, XIENCE V USA Registry, 1-Year Results, PCR 2010. DAPT interruption and discontinuation data shown is based on post-hoc analysis. Timing of 1st DAPT Interruption and any ST through 2 yrs Xience V patients(n=11,219) G. Stone, TCT 2011 7 11/19/2012 Timing of First DAPT Interruption and ST through 1 Year XIENCE V (N=10,615) T. Palmerini, PCR 2012 1-Year Target Vessel Failure Gwon et al. Circ 2012 8 11/19/2012 PRODIGY Conclusions—A regimen of 24 months of clopidogrel therapy in patients who had received a balanced mixture of DES or BMS was not significantly more effective than a 6month clopidogrel regimen in reducing the composite of death due to any cause, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident. M. Valgimigli, Circ published online March 21, 2012 What do the guidelines tell us for DAPT usage after DES Recent data suggest that DAPT for 6 months may be sufficient because late and very late stent thrombosis correlate poorly with discontinuation of DAPT If the risk of morbidity because of bleeding outweights the anticipated benefit afforded by thienopyridine therapy, earlier discontinuation should be considered (IIa C) *: DUKE heart registry, JAMA 07; 159-68 9 11/19/2012 Conclusion • Xience as a Second generation DES based on new platforms, polymer and drug, have shown to be “safe” and effective in randomized clinical trials. • These results are confirmed by the real world practice in registries and all comers trials according to current definitions. • Even with the discontinuation of DAPT, Xience has shown no increased rates of ST in patients treated. • Based on efficacy & safety results of Xience current practice has been changed dramatically away from first generation DES to Second generation DES. 10
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz