1.231J/16.781J/ESD.224J Airport Systems – Fall 2007 Airport Characteristics Amedeo R. Odoni Massachusetts Institute of Technology Page 1 Airport Characteristics Objective: – To provide background and an overview on the diversity of airport characteristics Topics: – Discussion of geometric characteristics of major airports – Introduce useful background and terminology – Critical aspects of airport layouts – Some international comparisons Reference: Chapter 9 [esp. 9.1-9.4] Page 2 1 Airport Physical Layouts Airport layouts exhibit enormous variability (general layout, no. of runways, geometric configuration of runways, length of runways, location and configuration of terminal facilities) Range from very simple to complex geometries Area occupied is only mildly correlated with traffic volumes Layouts are greatly influenced by historical and local factors Page 3 London Gatwick (LGW) Page 4 2 Designation of Runways Runways are identified by a two-digit number, which indicates the magnetic azimuth of the runway in the direction of operations to the nearest 10º When parallel runways are involved the indication R (“right”), L (“left”) and, with three runways, C (“center”) is also used (e.g., Runway 22R) Note that 22R is 04L in the opposite direction With 4-6 runways, one pair is marked to the nearest 10º and the other to the next nearest 10º Page 5 Osaka Kansai International (KIX) Page 6 3 Seattle-Tacoma International (SEA) Page 7 Milan Malpensa (MXP) Page 8 4 Munich International (MUC) Page 9 Athens International (ATH) Page 10 5 Singapore Changi International (SIN) Page 11 DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1A – COMMISSIONING DATE – 2008 Delhi International Airport (IGI) Page 12 6 DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1B – COMMISSIONING DATE – 2010 (FOR 2012 CAPACITY) Delhi International Airport (IGI) Page 13 New York LaGuardia (LGA) Page 14 7 Wind Coverage (ICAO) For operations on any given runway, crosswinds should not exceed: – 37 km/h (20 knots) for aircraft whose reference field length is 1500 m or more, except with poor braking action, when the limit is 24 km/h (13 knots) – 24 km/h (13 knots) for ref. field length between 1200 m and 1,499 m – 19 km/h (10.5 knots) for ref field length of less than 1,200 m Crosswind coverage (or “airport usability factor”) should be at least 95% Page 15 Frankfurt International (FRA) Page 16 8 London Heathrow (LHR) Page 17 Satellite with people movers: Tampa (TPA) Page 18 9 Satellite with people movers: Tampa (TPA) Page 19 New York JFK International (JFK) Page 20 10 Atlanta Hartsfield International (ATL) Page 21 Atlanta Hartsfield International (ATL) Page 22 11 Midfield linear satellites: Atlanta (ATL) Page 23 Los Angeles International (LAX) Page 24 12 Paris Charles de Gaulle (CDG) Page 25 Source: Airliners.net Page 26 13 SATURATION PHASE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Delhi International Airport (IGI) Page 27 Zurich International (ZRH) 3,300 m 3,700 m 2,500 m Page 28 14 Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS) Page 29 Page 30 15 Passenger Complex, AMS Page 31 Denver International (DEN) Page 32 16 Boston/Logan: Proposed Airside Changes (2001) Page 33 Dallas / Ft. Worth (DFW) Page 34 17 Chicago O’Hare (ORD) Page 35 Land Area of Some Major Airports Airport Denver Dallas/Ft. W. Orlando Kansas City Chicago Atlanta JFK Intern’l Los Angeles Miami Newark Boston Wash Reagan LaGuardia Acres 34,000 18,000 10,000 8,200 6,500 6,000 4,950 3,600 3,250 2,300 2,250 960 650 m2 (x106) 136 72 40 33 26 24 20 14 13 9 9 3.8 2.6 Airport m2 (x106) Buenos Aires EZE 34 Paris CDG 31 Amsterdam 28 Delhi 20 Frankfurt 19 Athens 16 Munich 15 Singapore 13 Brussels 12 Milan MXP 12 London LHR 12 Tokyo HND 11 Sydney 9 Zurich 8 London GTW 8 Tokyo NRT 7 Page 36 Kansai 5 18 Factors Affecting Airport Area Requirements • Principal factors affecting airfield size are: – Airside capacity requirements: number and configuration of runways and apron stands – Weather: no. and configuration of runways – Unused area: noise “buffer” or for future expansion – Types of aircraft and operations: runway, taxiway, apron dimensions and separations – Location of passenger terminals and landside facilities relative to runways • Terminal facilities and related landside space typically take up only 5-20% of an airport’s total area Page 37 30 Busiest Airports in the World (2006) (1)= pax (million); (2)= movements (thousand) (1) (2) (1)/(2) (1) (2) Atlanta 84.8 976 87 Chicago/O’Hare 76.2 959 79 London/Heathrow 67.5 477 Tokyo/Haneda 65.2 Los Angeles 61.0 Dallas/Ft. Worth (1)/(2) Houston 42.6 603 71 New York/JFK 42.6 375 114 142 Phoenix 41.4 541 77 285 229 Detroit 36.4 482 76 657 93 Minneapolis 35.6 476 75 60.1 700 86 New York /Newark 35.5 444 80 Paris/CDG 56.8 542 105 Singapore 35.0 214 164 Frankfurt 52.8 489 108 Orlando 34.8 350 99 Beijing 48.5 376 129 London/Gatwick 34.2 263 130 Denver 47.3 597 79 San Francisco 33.5 353 95 Las Vegas 46.2 619 75 Miami 32.5 386 84 Amsterdam 46.1 440 105 Tokyo/Narita 31.8 189 168 Madrid 45.5 435 105 Philadelphia 31.8 516 62 Hong Kong 44.0 280 157 Toronto 31.0 418 74 Bangkok 42.8 271 158 Munich 30.8 411 75 19 Contribution to Available Seat Mile Growth: US Major Carriers (1970(1970-2001) Source: Eclat Consulting (2002) Page 39 Generalizations: Major Airports... U.S.: Large volumes of passengers and aircraft; overwhelmingly domestic; numerous regional non-jets, general aviation; small no. of pax/flight Europe: Fast-growing passenger volumes at major airports; primarily international; narrowbody airline jets still dominate; few g.a. flights; intermediate no. of pax/flight East Asia/Pacific Rim: Fast-growing passenger volumes; strongest presence of wide-body jets; very few g.a. flights; large no. of pax/flight; numerous new low-fare carriers Diversity is enormous; understanding of local factors is essential. Page 40 20
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz