IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM)
e-ISSN: 2278-5728, p-ISSN: 2319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 5 Ver. IV (Sep. - Oct. 2015), PP 31-33
www.iosrjournals.org
Decomposition of Line Graph into Paths and Cycles
S.Lakshmi1, K.Kanchana2
1
Assistant Professor, Department of mathematics, PSGR Krishnammal college for women, Coimbatore,
Tamil nadu, India
2
Research Scholar, Department of mathematics, PSGR Krishnammal college for women , Coimbatore,
Tamil nadu, India
Abstract: Let Pπ+1 denote a path of length π and let Cπ denote a cycle of length π. As usual π«π denotes the
complete graph on π vertices. In this paper we investigate decompositions of line graph of π«π into p copies of
P5 and q copies of C4 for all possible values of p β₯ 0 and q β₯ 0.
Keywords: Path, Cycle, Graph Decomposition, Complete graph, Line graph.
I.
Introduction
Unless stated otherwise all graphs considered here are finite, simple, and undirected. For the standard
graph-theoretic terminology the readers are referred to [7].Let
denote a path of length and let
denote
a cycle of length π. Let
denotes a star on
vertices, i.e.
=
. As usual
denotes the complete
graph on π vertices. Let
denote the complete bipartite graph with π and π vertices in the parts. If G =
(V,E) is a simple graph then the line graph of G is the graph L(G) = (E,L), where L = {{π,π}|{π,π} β E,|π π|
= 1}. For the sake of convenience, we use π’π£ to denote an edge {π’,π£} and π’,π£ are called the ends of the edge
{π’,π£}. In general, if one allows more than one edge (but a finite number) between same pair of vertices, the
resulting graph is called a multigraph. In particular, if G is a simple graph then for any Ξ» β₯ 1, G (Ξ») and Ξ»G
respectively denote the multigraph with edge-multiplicity Ξ» and the disjoint union of Ξ» copies of G.
By a decomposition of a graph G, we mean a list of edge-disjoint subgraphs H1,β¦, Hπ, of G whose
union is G (ignoring isolated vertices). When each subgraph in a decomposition is isomorphic to H, we say that
G has an H-decomposition. It is easily seen that β e(Hi) = e(G) is one of the obvious necessary condition for
the existence of a {H1,H2,β¦,Hπ} β decomposition of G. A {H1,H2} β decomposition of G is a decomposition of
G into copies of H1 and H2 using at least one of each. If G has a {H1,H2}-decomposition, we say that G is
{H1,H2}-decomposable.
The problem of H-decomposition of Kπ(Ξ») is the well-known Alspachβs conjecture [6] when H is any
set of cycles of length at most π satisfying the necessary sum conditions and 2 | Ξ» (π-1) . For the case Ξ» =1,
Alspach conjecture is also stated for even values of π , where in this case the cycles should decompose Kπ
minus a one-factor. There are many related results, but only special cases of this conjecture are solved
completely. When H is a set of paths, in this case the problem of H- decomposition has been investigated by
Tarsi [19] who showed that if (πβ1) Ξ» is even and H is any set of paths of length at most π β 3 satisfying the
necessary sum condition, then
Kπ(Ξ») has an H-decomposition. The problem of H-decomposition of Kπ,π(Ξ» )
has been investigated by Truszczynski [20] when π and π are even and H is any set of the paths with some
constraints on length satisfying the necessary sum condition. It is natural to consider the problem of Hdecomposition of Kπ, where H is a combination of paths, cycles, and some other subgraphs. We will restrict our
attention to H which is any set of paths and cycles satisfying the necessary sum condition. There are several
similarly known results as follows. A graph-pair of order π‘ consists of two non-isomorphic graphs G and H on π‘
non-isolated vertices for which G βͺ H is isomorphic to Kπ‘.
Study on {H1,H2}-decomposition of graphs is not new. Abueida, Daven, and Rob- lee [1,3] completely
determined the values of π for which Kπ(Ξ» ) admits the {H1,H2}-decomposition such that H1 βͺ H2 β Kπ‘, when Ξ»
β₯ 1 and |V (H1)| = |V (H2)| = π‘, where π‘ β {4, 5}. Abueida and Daven [2] proved that there exists a {Kπ, Sπ+1}decomposition of Kπ for π β₯ 3 and π β‘ 0, 1 (mod π). Abueida and OβNeil [4] proved that for π β {3, 4, 5}, the
{Cπ, Sπ}-decomposition of Kπ(Ξ») exists, whenever π β₯ π + 1 except for the ordered triples (π,π, Ξ») β {(3, 4, 1),
(4, 5, 1), (5, 6, 1), (5, 6, 2), (5, 6, 4), (5, 7, 1), (5, 8, 1)}. Abueida and Daven [2] obtained necessary and
sufficient conditions for the {C4, (2K2)}- decomposition of the Cartesian product and tensor product of paths,
cycles, and complete graphs. Shyu [14] obtained a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a
{P5, C4}-decomposition of Kπ. Shyu [15] proved that Kπ has a {P4, S4}-decomposition if and only if π β₯ 6 and
3(π+π)= . Also he proved that Kπ has a {Pπ, Sπ}-decomposition with a restriction π β₯ π/2, when π even (resp.,
π β₯ π, when π odd). Shyu [16] obtained a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a {P4,K3}decomposition of Kπ. Shyu [17] proved that Kπ has a {C4, S5} - decomposition if and only if 4(π+π) =
,
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11543133
www.iosrjournals.org
31 | Page
Decomposition of Line Graph into Paths and Cycles
π β 1, when π is odd and π β₯ max { 3,
}, when π is even. Shyu [18] proved that Kπ,π has a {Pπ, Sπ}-
decomposition for some π and π and also obtained some necessary and sufficient condition for the existence
of a {P4, S4}-decomposition of Kπ,π. Sarvate and Zhang [13] obtained necessary and sufficient conditions for
the existence of a {πP3, πK3}-decomposition of Kπ(Ξ»), when π = π.
Chou et al. [8] proved that for a given triple (π,π,π) of nonnegative integers, G decompose into π
copies of C4, π copies of C6, and π copies of C8 such that 4π+6π+8π = |E(G)| in the following two cases: (a) G =
Kπ,π with π and π both even and greater than four (b) G = K π,π β I, where π is odd. Chou and Fu [9] proved
that the existence of a {C4,C2π‘}-decomposition of K2π’,2π£, where π‘/2 β€ π’,π£ < π‘, when π‘ even (resp., (π‘ + 1)/2 β€
π’,π£ β€ (3π‘ β 1)/2, when π‘ odd) implies such decomposition in K2m,2n, where π,π β₯ π‘ (resp., π,π β₯ (3π‘ + 1)/2). Lee
and Chu [10,11] obtained a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a {Pπ, Sπ}-decomposition of
Kπ,π and Kπ,π. Lee and Lin [12] obtained a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a {Cπ, Sπ+1}decomposition of Kπ,π β I. Abueida and Lian [5] obtained necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence
of a {Cπ, Sπ+1}-decomposition of Kπ for some π.
In this paper we investigate decompositions of line graph of Kπ into π copies of P5 and π copies of C4
for all possible values of π β₯ 0 and π β₯ 0.
II.
{P5,C4}-decomposition of L(Kπ)
In this section, we investigate the existence of {P5,C4}-decomposition of L(Kn). Note that, the line
graph of C4 is C4.
III.
Let
common vertex of
and
Construction:
=(πππππ) and
be two cycles of length 4, where
and
=(π€π₯π¦π§π€). If π£ is a only
, say π = π¦ = π£, then we have two paths of length 4 as follows: πππ£π§π€,π€π₯π£ππ.
Lemma 2.1. There exists a {P5, C4}-decomposition of K4,4.
Proof . Let V (K4,4) = {π₯1, π₯2, π₯3, π₯ 4} βͺ {π¦1, π¦2, π¦3, π¦4}. We exhibit the {P5,C4}-decomposition of K4,4 as
follows:
(1) π = 0 and π = 4. The required cycles are
(π₯1π¦1π₯2π¦2π₯1), (π₯1π¦3π₯2π¦4π₯1), (π₯3π¦1π₯4π¦2π₯3), (π₯3π¦3π₯4π¦4π₯3).
(2) π = 2 and π = 2. The required paths and cycles are
π¦1π₯1π¦2 π₯2π¦4, π¦4π₯1π¦3π₯2π¦1 and (π₯3π¦1π₯4π¦2π₯3), (π₯3π¦3π₯4π¦4π₯3).
(3) π = 3 and π = 1. The required paths and cycles are
π₯2π¦2π₯3π¦1π₯1, π₯1π¦3π₯2π¦1π₯4, π₯4π¦2π₯1π¦4π₯2 and (π₯3π¦3π₯4π¦4π₯3).
(4) p = 4 and q = 0. The required paths are
π¦1π₯1π¦2π₯2π¦4, π¦4π₯1π¦3π₯2π¦1, π¦3π₯3π¦4π₯4π¦2, π¦2 π₯3π¦1π₯4π¦.3 .
Lemma 2.2. There exists a {P5,C4}-decomposition of the complete bipartite graph K8,8π for all π β₯ 1.
Proof. Let V (K8,8π) = (X, Y ) with X = {π₯1, . . . , π₯8} Y = {π¦1, . . . , π¦8m}. Partition (X, Y ) into 4-subsets
( , ) such that
= X,
= Y. Then G[ , ] β
K4,4. Thus K8,8π = 4π(K4,4). By Lemma 2.1,
the graph K4,4 has a {P5,C4}-decomposition. Hence the graph K8,8π has the desired decomposition.
Lemma 2.3. There exists a {P5,C4}-decomposition of the graph K8π β F for all π β₯ 1, where F is a 1-factor
of K8π.
Proof. Let 8π = 4π, where π is a positive integer and V (K4π β I) = {π₯0, . . . , π₯4kβ1} = {
},
where I = {π₯2i π₯2i+1 : 0 β€ π β€ 2πβ1} and Aπ = {π₯2i, π₯2i+1}, 0 β€ π β€ 2πβ1. We obtain a new graph G from K4π βI,
by identifying each set Aπ with a single vertex aπ, join two vertices aπ and aπ by an edge if the corresponding sets
Aπ and Aπ form a K|Aπ|,|Aπ| in K4π. Then the new graph G =K2π. The graph K2π has a hamilton path
decomposition {G0, . . . ,Gπ}, where each Gπ, 0 β€ π β€ π is a hamilton path. Each Gπ decomposes some copies
of P3 or P4. When we go back to K4π β I, each P3 (resp., P4) of Gπ, 0 β€ π β€ π will gives rise to 2C4 or 2P5 (resp.,
{2P5, 1C4} or 3P5) in K4π β I. Hence the graph Kπ β I has the desired decomposition.
Lemma 2.4. There exit a {P5, C4} β decomposition of the graph L(K9).
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11543133
www.iosrjournals.org
32 | Page
Decomposition of Line Graph into Paths and Cycles
Proof. For 0 β€ π β€ 8, by Lemma 2.3 there exit a {P5,C4}-decomposition Gπ β
K8 β Fπ, where Gπ defined on the
vertex set {{π,π}|0β€ π β€ 8, π β π} and where Fπ = {{{ π , 1+π},{ π,2+π}, {π ,3+π},{ π,7+π},},{{π, 4+π},{π, 8+π}, {π,
5+π},{π,6+π}}}, reducing all sums modulo 9.Then a {P 5,C4}-decomposition of L(K9) on the vertex set
{{π,π}|{π,π} β {0,1,....,8}} follows from the partition of the edges of
into P5 or C4,
{({π,π+1},{1+π,5+ π }, {5+ π,2+ π },{2+ π , π }) | 0 β€ π β€ 8}, again reducing all sums modulo 9.
Theorem 2.1. If π β‘ 1 (mod 8) then there exists a {P5,C4} β decomposition of L(Kπ).
Proof. The result is true for π = 9, so we proceed by induction on π. Let π = 8π + 1, π β₯ 2, and let the vertex
set of kπ be {β} β {1,...,8π}. L(Kπ) can be partitioned into the following edge-disjoint subgraphs:
1. L(K9), K9 being defined on the vertex set {β} β {1,β¦,8};
2. L(K8π-7), K8π-7 being defined on the vertex set {β} β {9,β¦,8π};
3. For 1 β€ π β€ 8, Gπ β
K8π-8 β Fπ on the vertex set {{ π , π }|
9 β€ π β€ 8π},
where Fπ ={{ π , 2π-1}, { π , 2π} | 5 β€ π β€ 4π;
4. For
9 β€ π β€
8π, Gπ β
K8 β Fπ on the vertex set {{ π,π }| 1 β€ π β€
8},
where Fπ = {{2π-1,π},{2π,π}| 1 β€ π β€ 4;
5. (
)β (
);
K8,8π-8 with b-partition {{β , π}|1 β€ π β€ 8} and {{β, π}| 9 β€ π β€ 8π;
For 1 β€ π β€ 8, Hπ β
K8,8π-8 with bipartition {{π,π}| π β{β,1,2,β¦,8} \{π}} and {{π,π}| 9 β€ π β€ 8π}; and
For 9 β€ π β€ 8π, Hπ β
K8,8π-8 with bi-partition {{π,π}|1 β€ π β€ 8} and {{π ,π}| π β {β,9,10,β¦,8π}\
{π}}.
The result now follows, since there exist {P 5,C4}-decomposition of graphs defined in (1) and (2) by
induction and Lemma 2.4, (3) and (4) by Lemma 2.3, (5) since these edges form vertex-disjoint C4, and (6),(7)
and (8) by Lemma 2.2. Hence the graph L(Kπ) has the desired decomposition.
6.
7.
8.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
A.A. Abueida, M.Daven Multidesigns for graph-pairs of order 4 and 5 Graphs combin. 19 2003 433-447
A.A. Abueida, M.Daven Multidecomposition of the complete graph Ars combin.72 2004 17-22
A.A. Abueida, M. Daven and K.J. Roblee Multidesigns of the Ξ»βfold complete graph-pairs of orders 4 and 5 Australas.J.
Combin. 32 2005 125- 136
A.A. Abueida, T. OβNeil Multidecomposition of Kπ(Ξ») into small cycles and claws Bull. Inst. Comb. Appl. 49 2007 32-40
Discuss. Math. Graph Theory. 34 2014 113-125
B. Alspach Research Problems, Problem 3 Discret Math 36 1981 333.
J.A. Bondy, U.R.S. Murty Graph Theory with Applications The Macmillan Press Ltd, New York 1976
C.C.Chou, C.M. Fu and W.C. Huang Decomposition of Kπ,π into short cycles Discrete Math. 197/198 1999 195-203
C.C. Chou, C.M. Fu Decomposition of Kπ,π into 4-cycles 2t-cycles J. Comb. Optim. 14 2007 205-218
H.-C. Lee Multidecompositions of the balanced complete bipartite graphs into paths and stars ISRN combinatorics 2013 DOB:
10.1155/2013/398473
H.-C. Lee Multidecomposition of complete bipartite graphs into cycles and stars Ars Combin. 108 2013 355-364
H.-C. Lee Decomposition of complete bipartite graphs with a 1-factors removed into cycles and stars Discrete Math. 313 2013
2354-2358
D.G. Sarvate, L.Zhang Decomposition of a Ξ»Kπ£ into equal number of K3s and P3s, Bull. Inst. Comb.Appl. 67 2013 43-48
T.-W. Shyu Decomposition of complete graphs into paths and cycles Ars Combin. 97 2010 257-270
T.-W. Shyu Decompositions of complete graphs into paths and stars Discrete Math. 330 2010 2164-2169
T.-W. Shyu Decomposition of complete graphs into paths of length three and triangles Ars Combin. 107 2012 209-224
T.-W. Shyu Decomposition of complete graphs into cycles and stars Graphs Combin.29 2013 301-313
T.-W. Shyu Decomposition of complete bipartite graphs into paths and stars with same number of edge Discrete Math. 313 2013
865-871
M.Tarsi Decomposition of complete multigraph onto sample paths: Nonbalanced Handcuffed designs J. Combin Theory. Ser A 34
1983 60-70
M. Truszczynski Note on the decomposition of Ξ»Kπ,π (Ξ»K*π,π) into paths Discrete Math.55 1985 89-96.
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11543133
www.iosrjournals.org
33 | Page
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz