Decomposition of Line Graph into Paths and Cycles

IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM)
e-ISSN: 2278-5728, p-ISSN: 2319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 5 Ver. IV (Sep. - Oct. 2015), PP 31-33
www.iosrjournals.org
Decomposition of Line Graph into Paths and Cycles
S.Lakshmi1, K.Kanchana2
1
Assistant Professor, Department of mathematics, PSGR Krishnammal college for women, Coimbatore,
Tamil nadu, India
2
Research Scholar, Department of mathematics, PSGR Krishnammal college for women , Coimbatore,
Tamil nadu, India
Abstract: Let Pπ‘˜+1 denote a path of length π‘˜ and let Cπ‘˜ denote a cycle of length π‘˜. As usual 𝛫𝑛 denotes the
complete graph on 𝑛 vertices. In this paper we investigate decompositions of line graph of 𝛫𝑛 into p copies of
P5 and q copies of C4 for all possible values of p β‰₯ 0 and q β‰₯ 0.
Keywords: Path, Cycle, Graph Decomposition, Complete graph, Line graph.
I.
Introduction
Unless stated otherwise all graphs considered here are finite, simple, and undirected. For the standard
graph-theoretic terminology the readers are referred to [7].Let
denote a path of length and let
denote
a cycle of length π‘˜. Let
denotes a star on
vertices, i.e.
=
. As usual
denotes the complete
graph on 𝑛 vertices. Let
denote the complete bipartite graph with π‘š and 𝑛 vertices in the parts. If G =
(V,E) is a simple graph then the line graph of G is the graph L(G) = (E,L), where L = {{𝑒,𝑓}|{𝑒,𝑓} βŠ† E,|𝑒 𝑓|
= 1}. For the sake of convenience, we use 𝑒𝑣 to denote an edge {𝑒,𝑣} and 𝑒,𝑣 are called the ends of the edge
{𝑒,𝑣}. In general, if one allows more than one edge (but a finite number) between same pair of vertices, the
resulting graph is called a multigraph. In particular, if G is a simple graph then for any Ξ» β‰₯ 1, G (Ξ») and Ξ»G
respectively denote the multigraph with edge-multiplicity Ξ» and the disjoint union of Ξ» copies of G.
By a decomposition of a graph G, we mean a list of edge-disjoint subgraphs H1,…, Hπ‘˜, of G whose
union is G (ignoring isolated vertices). When each subgraph in a decomposition is isomorphic to H, we say that
G has an H-decomposition. It is easily seen that βˆ‘ e(Hi) = e(G) is one of the obvious necessary condition for
the existence of a {H1,H2,…,Hπ‘˜} – decomposition of G. A {H1,H2} – decomposition of G is a decomposition of
G into copies of H1 and H2 using at least one of each. If G has a {H1,H2}-decomposition, we say that G is
{H1,H2}-decomposable.
The problem of H-decomposition of K𝑛(Ξ») is the well-known Alspach’s conjecture [6] when H is any
set of cycles of length at most 𝑛 satisfying the necessary sum conditions and 2 | Ξ» (𝑛-1) . For the case Ξ» =1,
Alspach conjecture is also stated for even values of 𝑛 , where in this case the cycles should decompose K𝑛
minus a one-factor. There are many related results, but only special cases of this conjecture are solved
completely. When H is a set of paths, in this case the problem of H- decomposition has been investigated by
Tarsi [19] who showed that if (π‘›βˆ’1) Ξ» is even and H is any set of paths of length at most 𝑛 βˆ’ 3 satisfying the
necessary sum condition, then
K𝑛(Ξ») has an H-decomposition. The problem of H-decomposition of Kπ‘š,𝑛(Ξ» )
has been investigated by Truszczynski [20] when π‘š and 𝑛 are even and H is any set of the paths with some
constraints on length satisfying the necessary sum condition. It is natural to consider the problem of Hdecomposition of K𝑛, where H is a combination of paths, cycles, and some other subgraphs. We will restrict our
attention to H which is any set of paths and cycles satisfying the necessary sum condition. There are several
similarly known results as follows. A graph-pair of order 𝑑 consists of two non-isomorphic graphs G and H on 𝑑
non-isolated vertices for which G βˆͺ H is isomorphic to K𝑑.
Study on {H1,H2}-decomposition of graphs is not new. Abueida, Daven, and Rob- lee [1,3] completely
determined the values of 𝑛 for which K𝑛(Ξ» ) admits the {H1,H2}-decomposition such that H1 βˆͺ H2 β‰Œ K𝑑, when Ξ»
β‰₯ 1 and |V (H1)| = |V (H2)| = 𝑑, where 𝑑 ∈ {4, 5}. Abueida and Daven [2] proved that there exists a {Kπ‘˜, Sπ‘˜+1}decomposition of K𝑛 for π‘˜ β‰₯ 3 and 𝑛 ≑ 0, 1 (mod π‘˜). Abueida and O’Neil [4] proved that for π‘˜ ∈ {3, 4, 5}, the
{Cπ‘˜, Sπ‘˜}-decomposition of K𝑛(Ξ») exists, whenever 𝑛 β‰₯ π‘˜ + 1 except for the ordered triples (π‘˜,𝑛, Ξ») ∈ {(3, 4, 1),
(4, 5, 1), (5, 6, 1), (5, 6, 2), (5, 6, 4), (5, 7, 1), (5, 8, 1)}. Abueida and Daven [2] obtained necessary and
sufficient conditions for the {C4, (2K2)}- decomposition of the Cartesian product and tensor product of paths,
cycles, and complete graphs. Shyu [14] obtained a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a
{P5, C4}-decomposition of K𝑛. Shyu [15] proved that K𝑛 has a {P4, S4}-decomposition if and only if 𝑛 β‰₯ 6 and
3(𝑝+π‘ž)= . Also he proved that K𝑛 has a {Pπ‘˜, Sπ‘˜}-decomposition with a restriction 𝑝 β‰₯ π‘˜/2, when π‘˜ even (resp.,
𝑝 β‰₯ π‘˜, when π‘˜ odd). Shyu [16] obtained a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a {P4,K3}decomposition of K𝑛. Shyu [17] proved that K𝑛 has a {C4, S5} - decomposition if and only if 4(𝑝+π‘ž) =
,
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11543133
www.iosrjournals.org
31 | Page
Decomposition of Line Graph into Paths and Cycles
π‘ž β‰  1, when 𝑛 is odd and π‘ž β‰₯ max { 3,
}, when 𝑛 is even. Shyu [18] proved that Kπ‘š,𝑛 has a {Pπ‘˜, Sπ‘˜}-
decomposition for some π‘š and 𝑛 and also obtained some necessary and sufficient condition for the existence
of a {P4, S4}-decomposition of Kπ‘š,𝑛. Sarvate and Zhang [13] obtained necessary and sufficient conditions for
the existence of a {𝑝P3, π‘žK3}-decomposition of K𝑛(Ξ»), when 𝑝 = π‘ž.
Chou et al. [8] proved that for a given triple (𝑝,π‘ž,π‘Ÿ) of nonnegative integers, G decompose into 𝑝
copies of C4, π‘ž copies of C6, and π‘Ÿ copies of C8 such that 4𝑝+6π‘ž+8π‘Ÿ = |E(G)| in the following two cases: (a) G =
Kπ‘š,𝑛 with π‘š and 𝑛 both even and greater than four (b) G = K 𝑛,𝑛 βˆ’ I, where 𝑛 is odd. Chou and Fu [9] proved
that the existence of a {C4,C2𝑑}-decomposition of K2𝑒,2𝑣, where 𝑑/2 ≀ 𝑒,𝑣 < 𝑑, when 𝑑 even (resp., (𝑑 + 1)/2 ≀
𝑒,𝑣 ≀ (3𝑑 βˆ’ 1)/2, when 𝑑 odd) implies such decomposition in K2m,2n, where π‘š,𝑛 β‰₯ 𝑑 (resp., π‘š,𝑛 β‰₯ (3𝑑 + 1)/2). Lee
and Chu [10,11] obtained a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a {Pπ‘˜, Sπ‘˜}-decomposition of
K𝑛,𝑛 and Kπ‘š,𝑛. Lee and Lin [12] obtained a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a {Cπ‘˜, Sπ‘˜+1}decomposition of K𝑛,𝑛 βˆ’ I. Abueida and Lian [5] obtained necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence
of a {Cπ‘˜, Sπ‘˜+1}-decomposition of K𝑛 for some 𝑛.
In this paper we investigate decompositions of line graph of K𝑛 into 𝑝 copies of P5 and π‘ž copies of C4
for all possible values of 𝑝 β‰₯ 0 and π‘ž β‰₯ 0.
II.
{P5,C4}-decomposition of L(K𝑛)
In this section, we investigate the existence of {P5,C4}-decomposition of L(Kn). Note that, the line
graph of C4 is C4.
III.
Let
common vertex of
and
Construction:
=(π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘‘π‘Ž) and
be two cycles of length 4, where
and
=(𝑀π‘₯𝑦𝑧𝑀). If 𝑣 is a only
, say 𝑐 = 𝑦 = 𝑣, then we have two paths of length 4 as follows: π‘Žπ‘π‘£π‘§π‘€,𝑀π‘₯π‘£π‘‘π‘Ž.
Lemma 2.1. There exists a {P5, C4}-decomposition of K4,4.
Proof . Let V (K4,4) = {π‘₯1, π‘₯2, π‘₯3, π‘₯ 4} βˆͺ {𝑦1, 𝑦2, 𝑦3, 𝑦4}. We exhibit the {P5,C4}-decomposition of K4,4 as
follows:
(1) 𝑝 = 0 and π‘ž = 4. The required cycles are
(π‘₯1𝑦1π‘₯2𝑦2π‘₯1), (π‘₯1𝑦3π‘₯2𝑦4π‘₯1), (π‘₯3𝑦1π‘₯4𝑦2π‘₯3), (π‘₯3𝑦3π‘₯4𝑦4π‘₯3).
(2) 𝑝 = 2 and π‘ž = 2. The required paths and cycles are
𝑦1π‘₯1𝑦2 π‘₯2𝑦4, 𝑦4π‘₯1𝑦3π‘₯2𝑦1 and (π‘₯3𝑦1π‘₯4𝑦2π‘₯3), (π‘₯3𝑦3π‘₯4𝑦4π‘₯3).
(3) 𝑝 = 3 and π‘ž = 1. The required paths and cycles are
π‘₯2𝑦2π‘₯3𝑦1π‘₯1, π‘₯1𝑦3π‘₯2𝑦1π‘₯4, π‘₯4𝑦2π‘₯1𝑦4π‘₯2 and (π‘₯3𝑦3π‘₯4𝑦4π‘₯3).
(4) p = 4 and q = 0. The required paths are
𝑦1π‘₯1𝑦2π‘₯2𝑦4, 𝑦4π‘₯1𝑦3π‘₯2𝑦1, 𝑦3π‘₯3𝑦4π‘₯4𝑦2, 𝑦2 π‘₯3𝑦1π‘₯4𝑦.3 .
Lemma 2.2. There exists a {P5,C4}-decomposition of the complete bipartite graph K8,8π‘š for all π‘š β‰₯ 1.
Proof. Let V (K8,8π‘š) = (X, Y ) with X = {π‘₯1, . . . , π‘₯8} Y = {𝑦1, . . . , 𝑦8m}. Partition (X, Y ) into 4-subsets
( , ) such that
= X,
= Y. Then G[ , ] β‰… K4,4. Thus K8,8π‘š = 4π‘š(K4,4). By Lemma 2.1,
the graph K4,4 has a {P5,C4}-decomposition. Hence the graph K8,8π‘š has the desired decomposition.
Lemma 2.3. There exists a {P5,C4}-decomposition of the graph K8π‘š βˆ’ F for all π‘š β‰₯ 1, where F is a 1-factor
of K8π‘š.
Proof. Let 8π‘š = 4π‘˜, where π‘˜ is a positive integer and V (K4π‘˜ βˆ’ I) = {π‘₯0, . . . , π‘₯4kβˆ’1} = {
},
where I = {π‘₯2i π‘₯2i+1 : 0 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ 2π‘˜βˆ’1} and A𝑖 = {π‘₯2i, π‘₯2i+1}, 0 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ 2π‘˜βˆ’1. We obtain a new graph G from K4π‘˜ βˆ’I,
by identifying each set A𝑖 with a single vertex a𝑖, join two vertices a𝑖 and a𝑗 by an edge if the corresponding sets
A𝑖 and A𝑗 form a K|A𝑖|,|A𝑗| in K4π‘˜. Then the new graph G =K2π‘˜. The graph K2π‘˜ has a hamilton path
decomposition {G0, . . . ,Gπ‘˜}, where each G𝑖, 0 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ π‘˜ is a hamilton path. Each G𝑖 decomposes some copies
of P3 or P4. When we go back to K4π‘˜ βˆ’ I, each P3 (resp., P4) of G𝑖, 0 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ π‘˜ will gives rise to 2C4 or 2P5 (resp.,
{2P5, 1C4} or 3P5) in K4π‘˜ βˆ’ I. Hence the graph Kπ‘š βˆ’ I has the desired decomposition.
Lemma 2.4. There exit a {P5, C4} – decomposition of the graph L(K9).
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11543133
www.iosrjournals.org
32 | Page
Decomposition of Line Graph into Paths and Cycles
Proof. For 0 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ 8, by Lemma 2.3 there exit a {P5,C4}-decomposition G𝑖 β‰… K8 – F𝑖, where G𝑖 defined on the
vertex set {{𝑖,𝑗}|0≀ 𝑗 ≀ 8, 𝑗 β‰  𝑖} and where F𝑖 = {{{ 𝑖 , 1+𝑖},{ 𝑖,2+𝑖}, {𝑖 ,3+𝑖},{ 𝑖,7+𝑖},},{{𝑖, 4+𝑖},{𝑖, 8+𝑖}, {𝑖,
5+𝑖},{𝑖,6+𝑖}}}, reducing all sums modulo 9.Then a {P 5,C4}-decomposition of L(K9) on the vertex set
{{𝑖,𝑗}|{𝑖,𝑗} βŠ† {0,1,....,8}} follows from the partition of the edges of
into P5 or C4,
{({𝑗,𝑗+1},{1+𝑗,5+ 𝑗 }, {5+ 𝑗,2+ 𝑗 },{2+ 𝑗 , 𝑗 }) | 0 ≀ 𝑗 ≀ 8}, again reducing all sums modulo 9.
Theorem 2.1. If 𝑛 ≑ 1 (mod 8) then there exists a {P5,C4} – decomposition of L(K𝑛).
Proof. The result is true for 𝑛 = 9, so we proceed by induction on 𝑛. Let 𝑛 = 8π‘š + 1, π‘š β‰₯ 2, and let the vertex
set of k𝑛 be {∞} ⋃ {1,...,8π‘š}. L(K𝑛) can be partitioned into the following edge-disjoint subgraphs:
1. L(K9), K9 being defined on the vertex set {∞} ⋃ {1,…,8};
2. L(K8π‘š-7), K8π‘š-7 being defined on the vertex set {∞} ⋃ {9,…,8π‘š};
3. For 1 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ 8, G𝑖 β‰… K8π‘š-8 – F𝑖 on the vertex set {{ 𝑖 , 𝑗 }|
9 ≀ 𝑗 ≀ 8π‘š},
where F𝑖 ={{ 𝑖 , 2π‘˜-1}, { 𝑖 , 2π‘˜} | 5 ≀ π‘˜ ≀ 4π‘š;
4. For
9 ≀ 𝑗 ≀
8π‘š, G𝑖 β‰… K8 – F𝑗 on the vertex set {{ 𝑖,𝑗 }| 1 ≀ 𝑖 ≀
8},
where F𝑗 = {{2π‘˜-1,𝑗},{2π‘˜,𝑗}| 1 ≀ π‘˜ ≀ 4;
5. (
)⋃ (
);
K8,8π‘š-8 with b-partition {{∞ , 𝑖}|1 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ 8} and {{∞, 𝑗}| 9 ≀ 𝑗 ≀ 8π‘š;
For 1 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ 8, H𝑖 β‰… K8,8π‘š-8 with bipartition {{𝑖,π‘˜}| π‘˜ ∈{∞,1,2,…,8} \{𝑖}} and {{𝑖,𝑗}| 9 ≀ 𝑗 ≀ 8π‘š}; and
For 9 ≀ 𝑗 ≀ 8π‘š, H𝑗 β‰… K8,8π‘š-8 with bi-partition {{𝑖,𝑗}|1 ≀ 𝑖 ≀ 8} and {{π‘˜ ,𝑗}| π‘˜ ∈ {∞,9,10,…,8π‘š}\
{𝑗}}.
The result now follows, since there exist {P 5,C4}-decomposition of graphs defined in (1) and (2) by
induction and Lemma 2.4, (3) and (4) by Lemma 2.3, (5) since these edges form vertex-disjoint C4, and (6),(7)
and (8) by Lemma 2.2. Hence the graph L(K𝑛) has the desired decomposition.
6.
7.
8.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
A.A. Abueida, M.Daven Multidesigns for graph-pairs of order 4 and 5 Graphs combin. 19 2003 433-447
A.A. Abueida, M.Daven Multidecomposition of the complete graph Ars combin.72 2004 17-22
A.A. Abueida, M. Daven and K.J. Roblee Multidesigns of the λ–fold complete graph-pairs of orders 4 and 5 Australas.J.
Combin. 32 2005 125- 136
A.A. Abueida, T. O’Neil Multidecomposition of Kπ‘š(Ξ») into small cycles and claws Bull. Inst. Comb. Appl. 49 2007 32-40
Discuss. Math. Graph Theory. 34 2014 113-125
B. Alspach Research Problems, Problem 3 Discret Math 36 1981 333.
J.A. Bondy, U.R.S. Murty Graph Theory with Applications The Macmillan Press Ltd, New York 1976
C.C.Chou, C.M. Fu and W.C. Huang Decomposition of Kπ‘š,𝑛 into short cycles Discrete Math. 197/198 1999 195-203
C.C. Chou, C.M. Fu Decomposition of Kπ‘š,𝑛 into 4-cycles 2t-cycles J. Comb. Optim. 14 2007 205-218
H.-C. Lee Multidecompositions of the balanced complete bipartite graphs into paths and stars ISRN combinatorics 2013 DOB:
10.1155/2013/398473
H.-C. Lee Multidecomposition of complete bipartite graphs into cycles and stars Ars Combin. 108 2013 355-364
H.-C. Lee Decomposition of complete bipartite graphs with a 1-factors removed into cycles and stars Discrete Math. 313 2013
2354-2358
D.G. Sarvate, L.Zhang Decomposition of a Ξ»K𝑣 into equal number of K3s and P3s, Bull. Inst. Comb.Appl. 67 2013 43-48
T.-W. Shyu Decomposition of complete graphs into paths and cycles Ars Combin. 97 2010 257-270
T.-W. Shyu Decompositions of complete graphs into paths and stars Discrete Math. 330 2010 2164-2169
T.-W. Shyu Decomposition of complete graphs into paths of length three and triangles Ars Combin. 107 2012 209-224
T.-W. Shyu Decomposition of complete graphs into cycles and stars Graphs Combin.29 2013 301-313
T.-W. Shyu Decomposition of complete bipartite graphs into paths and stars with same number of edge Discrete Math. 313 2013
865-871
M.Tarsi Decomposition of complete multigraph onto sample paths: Nonbalanced Handcuffed designs J. Combin Theory. Ser A 34
1983 60-70
M. Truszczynski Note on the decomposition of Ξ»Kπ‘š,𝑛 (Ξ»K*π‘š,𝑛) into paths Discrete Math.55 1985 89-96.
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11543133
www.iosrjournals.org
33 | Page