Richard Oborn In June of 2003, the debate over the use of race-based preferential treatment in university and college admissions reached the chambers of our nation’s highest court. In two controversial cases, the United States Supreme Court upheld the use of race as a “plus” factor in the college admissions process. While the decision was a victory for advocates of racial affirmative action, the use of preferential treatment of racial minorities does not address the real problem of college admissions: the growing economic segregation on America’s campuses of higher education. It is the belief of the author that affirmative action in college admissions must continue, but that preferences should target economic disadvantage rather than race in the admissions process. Grutter v. Bollinger Grutter v. Bollinger Gratz v. Bollinger Gratz v. Bollinger Richard Oborn Grutter v. Bollinger Gratz v. Bollinger Gratz v. Bollinger Grutter v. Bollinger Regents of University of California v. Bakke Gratz v. Bollinger Grutter v. Bollinger University of California Regents v. Bakke 1978, 265 Adarand University of California Regents v. Constructor, Inc. v. Pena Bakke 1978, 265 Adrarand Constructor, Inc. v. Pena Bakke Grutter v. Bollinger Grutter v. Bollinger Bakke v. State Board of Richard Oborn Regents University of California Regents v. Bakke Marks v. United States Bakke Johnson v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan U.S. v. Paradise Grutter v. Bollinger Grutter v. Bollinger Grutter v. Bollinger Richard Oborn Concentrated Poverty Poverty Level Parents Education Income and Net Worth Family Structure Socioeconomic Race/Ethnicity, and Selective College Newsweek New York Times Status, Richard Oborn Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena The Bakke Case: Quotas in College Admissions The Shape of the River: LongTerm Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Selective College Admissions The Bakke Case: The Politics of Inequality U.S. News and World Report Collision Course: The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy in America Gratz v. Bollinger Gratz v. Bollinger Grutter v. Bollinger Grutter v. Bollinger Grutter v. Bollinger Chronicle of Higher Eduction Johnson v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan Washington Post Marks v. United States U.S. v. Paradise RaceNeutral Alternatives in Post-Secondary Education: Innovative Approaches in Diversity University of California Regents v. Bakke Affirmative Action
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz