this PDF file

Richard Oborn
In June of 2003, the debate over the use of race-based preferential treatment in university and college admissions reached the chambers of our nation’s highest court. In two controversial cases, the United States
Supreme Court upheld the use of race as a “plus” factor in the college admissions process. While the decision was a victory for advocates of racial affirmative action, the use of preferential treatment of racial minorities does not address the real problem of college admissions: the growing economic segregation on America’s
campuses of higher education. It is the belief of the author that affirmative action in college admissions must
continue, but that preferences should target economic disadvantage rather than race in the admissions
process.
Grutter v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Gratz v.
Bollinger
Gratz v. Bollinger
Richard Oborn
Grutter v. Bollinger
Gratz v. Bollinger
Gratz v. Bollinger
Grutter v.
Bollinger
Regents of University of
California v. Bakke
Gratz v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
University of
California Regents v. Bakke 1978, 265
Adarand
University of California Regents v.
Constructor, Inc. v. Pena
Bakke 1978, 265
Adrarand Constructor,
Inc. v. Pena
Bakke
Grutter v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Bakke v. State Board of
Richard Oborn
Regents
University of California Regents v. Bakke
Marks v.
United States
Bakke
Johnson v. Board of Regents of the
University of Michigan
U.S. v. Paradise
Grutter v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Richard Oborn
Concentrated Poverty
Poverty Level
Parents Education
Income and Net Worth
Family Structure
Socioeconomic
Race/Ethnicity, and Selective College
Newsweek
New York Times
Status,
Richard Oborn
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena
The Bakke Case: Quotas in College Admissions
The Shape of the River: LongTerm Consequences of Considering Race in College and University
Admissions
Socioeconomic
Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Selective College Admissions
The Bakke Case: The Politics
of Inequality
U.S. News and World Report
Collision Course: The Strange Convergence
of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy in America
Gratz v. Bollinger
Gratz v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Chronicle of Higher
Eduction
Johnson v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan
Washington Post
Marks v. United States
U.S. v. Paradise
RaceNeutral Alternatives in Post-Secondary Education: Innovative
Approaches in Diversity
University of California Regents v. Bakke
Affirmative Action