AUTISM ACCREDITATION REVIEW REPORT Fox Wood School Review Date: 22/01/2015 Review Team Team Leader Name Jackie Tickner Team Member Name Jean Mockford Occupation Independent Professional Occupation Retired Head Teacher Page 1 of 57 TABLE OF CONTENTS Amend as appropriate SECTION PAGE NUMBER COVER TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PEN PICTURE PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS POTENTIAL AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL AREAS OF STRENGTH REVIEW STANDARDS SUMMARY APPENDIX PANEL REPORT TERMINOLOGY 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 18 22 23 24 INITIALS OF AUTHOR Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 2 of 57 JT/JM JT/JM JT/JM JT/JM JT INTRODUCTION The review report is designed to provide a concise and focused insight into the organisation’s performance against accreditation teaching/learning standards. The Review Report focuses to the criteria for Autism Accreditation. 1. 2. 3. 4. The service has a specialised knowledge and understanding of autism spectrum disorders. The knowledge and understanding of autism spectrum disorders consistently informs the organisation, resources and management of the service. The knowledge and understanding of autism spectrum disorders consistently informs the individual assessment and planning for all people with autism. The knowledge and understanding of autism spectrum disorders consistently results in positive outcomes for all people with autism. The Review Report will be submitted to the Autism Accreditation Panel and forms part of the decision making process. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 3 of 57 PEN PICTURE SERVICE PROVIDER Name of Organisation Address Telephone Number Mission Statement Organisations Governance Fox Wood School Children’s Services Directorate Warrington Borough Council Newtown House Buttermarket Street Warrington WA1 2FG 01925 444000 Mission Statement (Electronic copy attached) Links to this on school website… www.foxwoodschool.org.uk (E.g. Online Links to Statutory Reviews, Annual Reports) Details of any other services All services provided by Warrington Local Authority NB Green Lane School also registered with Autism Accreditation Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 4 of 57 Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 5 of 57 Name of Provision being reviewed Fox Wood School Contact Person Val Howarth, Aidan Yates Details of provision(s) (Please list separately all provisions being Reviewed and add/delete bullets as required) Address(es); - Number of Placements; - Type of Service/School; and - Specialist Standard used Fox Wood School Woolston Learning Village Holes Lane Woolston Warrington WA1 4LS 62 (27 pupils with ASD) Complex Needs Special School Telephone Fax Email address Autism Specific Aims for Care / Education Management and Staff Structure Description of service/school Philosophy of service/school Are there any safeguarding issues which you feel would Specialist Standard – Day School Standards 01925 811534 01925 852435 [email protected] School Aims (Electronic copy attached) Head Teacher-Karen Nicholls (long term sick since February 2014 Acting Head Teacher-Val Howarth Acting Deputy-Aidan Yates Acting Assistant Head-14-19 Manager –Louise Messham Twelve teacher including SLT Two level 4 Teaching Assistants 23.5 Teaching Assistants Fox Wood School is a generic Special School with a wide range of needs. Fox Wood caters for pupils aged 4 to 16 and with P Levels ranging from P1 to NC Level 2. The vast majority of pupils are working at around P5/6. (Fox wood Special School and Green Lane Special School have a joint post 16 college which was opened in Feb 2014) The school population consists of three main bodies of pupils. Pupils with PMLD and increasingly complex medical needs. Pupils with ASD and SLD with varying degrees of challenging behaviour and Pupils with SLD See Ethos and Values in School Prospectus. (Electronic copy attached) NO Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 6 of 57 have an impact on the Accreditation Review? Description of Physical Environment / Buildings Fox Wood School was relocated in September 2014 three miles from its previous site. It sits on the site of an old high school which has a mixture of buildings and three separate educational provisions. The local MLD school (Green Lane) occupy the old high school building itself which has largely been refurbished. Fox Wood School has been built on the footprint of the high schools refectory and kitchens and has been completely rebuilt. On site is also post 16 provision (Woolston 6 th Form College), this serves both pupils from Green Lane and Fox Wood and was opened in Feb 2014 after the old high schools 6th form building was refurbished. Joining all three educational provisions together is a shared area. This is made up of a hydrotherapy pool with changing rooms, a large sports hall with separate changing areas, a music room, a medical room and a therapy room. At present –the hydrotherapy pool and the sports hall have not yet been handed over to the school by the building company. Fox Wood school itself consists of 11 classrooms (with most having medical rooms and bathrooms attached). The school has a hall (which is used for PE, lunch and assembly) an art room, a food technology room a library/ICT room, a multi-sensory room plus SaLT and physiotherapy rooms. The school also has a number of bathrooms and hygiene rooms and a quiet room too. Each classroom has direct access to outside play (this comprises separate upper school playgrounds). These were newly installed towards the end of November. Both play areas are made up a cycle track (complete with adapted bikes), climbing areas with bridges and slides, benches and music areas. Both areas have textured flooring and have areas covered with artificial grass. Both have their own covered areas so pupils can be outdoors even during wet weather. During the design of the play areas there was a conscious decision to lean towards equipment being age appropriate. Whilst both play areas have common items, the design of these is very different to fit in with the ages of pupils using the areas. The lower play area has some structures that cannot be found within the upper play area (again for reasons of age appropriacy) e.g. wig wam and wooden boat with seats The same is true of the multi-sensory room at Fox Wood School tooi.e. quotes received, company chosen with installation taking place hopefully during February half term Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 7 of 57 PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS (if applicable) As identified by the Panel Recommendation 1 Core Standard 15: Sensory Issues The school may wish to consider further developing the use of Sensory Profiles to support pupils in self managing their sensory needs ______________________________________________________ The school has a Sensory Policy which sets out the school’s practice in this area, it includes aims, outcomes, practice and training. It describes how sensory profiles are completed by the Occupational Therapist and sensory checklists by class teams and that sensory diets are written for pupils. The school funds the Occupational Therapist for one day per week as there is no NHS provision for a therapist to focus on sensory integration locally and the school assesses this to be a significant area of need. Staff report that the development of practice in the area of sensory difficulties has had a positive impact on problem behaviour and staff feel they now have a greater understanding of the difficulties pupils present. The OT assesses that staff are more able to anticipate pupil’s needs and often intervene with a sensory strategy before a pupil becomes distressed rather than in response to this. Some pupils use the sensory room on arrival at school in order to be ready for a day in their class following a lengthy journey on a minibus. The school’s ASD Policy explains the impact of sensory issues on pupils with autism. Fox Wood School now conducts assessments for all pupils with autism and following this sensory diets are written. This work is mainly undertaken by the Occupational Therapist (OT) but the school’s approach was developed jointly with the Assistant Head Teacher. Sensory checklists are also completed by class teams, who see the pupil in a variety of situations. It is intended that sensory assessments will be revisited each year so that changes for pupils are recognised and strategies modified as needed. As part of this work the school, which has a very proactive approach to information technology, uses an iPad app (Brainworks) which identifies activities which are likely to meet sensory needs. Staff have been trained in how this app can be used. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 8 of 57 Training for staff in understanding sensory processing difficulties has been delivered by the Occupational Therapist. All classrooms now have a range of sensory items available. During one observation where pupils were required to wait for their turn many used twiddle or chewy items to support them to manage this. All classes have a sensory box so that supportive materials are to hand during lessons. Pupils with autism have a sensory target on their Individual Education Plan (IEP). Examples of targets include: I can take an adult and show them a large photograph of the sensory room on the door when I am unhappy and want to leave the room. I can taste requested foods when prompted by an adult at snack and lunch time. Xxxxx will become used to the noises made by his new classmate. The school’s enrichment programme includes a ‘Sensory Circuits’ session and this was observed by a member of the team. Pupils had access to a range of sensory activities including a small trampoline and a lycra tunnel. Pupils’ choices and instructions were visually supported during this activity. During classroom observations an understanding of how sensory needs can be met and sensory opportunities included in the curriculum was displayed. During a lesson on the Antarctic pupils could compare ice, snow and water. In a PE lesson pupils were jumping from a bench onto bubble wrap and younger pupils were able to use shaving foam and paint to investigate letter shapes. The school has identified as future development a need for more detailed or extended assessment of pupils with higher needs and the possibility of involving outside agencies in developing effective strategies and extending understanding. The review team assess practice in the area of sensory issues to meet the standard set by Autism Accreditation. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 9 of 57 Sources of Evidence: Written Documentation of: Interim Development Report Enrichment Programme Interviews & Discussions with: Acting Deputy Head Teacher Occupational Therapist Observations: Classroom Activities Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 10 of 57 Recommendation 2 Core Standard 10: Communication The school may wish to consider re-evaluating their use of Picture exchange Communication system (PECs) and visual communication Systems to ensure clarity between the two systems. ______________________________________________________ Fox Wood School has a Communication Policy which describes its Total Communication approach. Observations confirmed that this practice is embedded across the school. PECS was seen to be an effective communication tool for many pupils, however a range of visual systems, Makaton, modified language and electronic communicators were all observed. The communication needs and systems used by pupils with autism are recorded in a database. Although communication practice at Fox Wood School has included the use of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) for some time the school has more recently carried out work to develop the effective use of PECS in a broader range of settings and circumstances, e.g. using PECS for a social purpose. The Speech and Language Therapist has delivered training in order to ensure that staff are able to develop this work. Use of PECS at lunchtimes has been significantly increased. During lunchtimes the school hopes to engage most pupils in physical and constructive activities and training has taken place from outside professionals to develop the range of activities that are available to pupils and that staff are involved with. PECS materials were also seen to be used effectively by pupils within the dining hall. All pupils have an IEP which includes a communication target and PECs features in these, e.g. Xxxxx will request two items using his PECS book. A communication board with symbols for each activity or piece of equipment is displayed in the playground and pupils can use this to request, at the same time it acts to prompt pupils as to the choices that are on offer. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 11 of 57 Within classrooms motivating choice activities are kept in cupboards which results in pupils needing to request these through the use of PECS or other means. This understanding of the need for ‘communicative pressure’ is crucial in supporting pupils to develop their communication. Sources of Evidence: Written Documentation of: Interim Development Report Communication Policy Individual Education Plans Self Audit Interviews & Discussions with: Acting Deputy Head Teacher Speech and Language Therapist Observations: Classroom Observations Observations during breaks and transitions Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 12 of 57 Recommendation 3 Specialist Standard 2: Teaching and Learning Programme/Curriculum and Activity Content As the school further develops the 14-19 curriculum they may wish to extend the age appropriate activities and challenge of qualifications offered. ______________________________________________________ The move to a new school building in September 2014 has meant that the post 16 provision is now separated from the main school and is part of the new Woolston 6th Form College. Students share this provision with students from a neighbouring MLD school. In 2012 the 14-19 curriculum was reviewed and rewritten in a thematic way to enable more opportunities to promote independence and life skills. Students are given opportunities to experience age appropriate activities. In one lesson the class were listening to an adaptation of George Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’. With the support of visuals and key words students were able to access a more complex text. Accreditation is linked into the curriculum with KS4 students following the New Horizons Accreditation (ASDAN). This course encourages independent working and at the end of year two the students gain a Personal Progress Qualification (QCF) which is internally assessed and externally moderated. Students access a pathway depending on their P and NC levels. The Personal Progress accreditation is supplemented with the AQA Unit Award Scheme. This enables learners to gain formal recognition for achieving short units of work. Students also follow OCR which provides additional vocational qualifications that equip students to gain necessary life skills. Students have a broad and balanced curriculum in KS4 which includes vocational learning (including work related learning). Every year the school holds five Citizenship days which are shared between KS4 and 5 and cover some of the content required in the New National Curriculum for Citizenship. KS4 students also join in with the School’s Enrichment Programme. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 13 of 57 Transitions between KS4 and 5 are staggered with students joining in with activities as appropriate for at least one day per half term during Year 11. Students also go on joint class visits and experience creative projects. To support transition from KS3 to 4 the school, college and neighbouring MLD provision have been colour coded to denote key areas such as classrooms, toilets, administration and the like. The curriculum links between KS4/5 include Enterprise, Duke of Edinburgh Awards and work experience. Some students undertake their work experience in school and others go to local businesses. Where appropriate students maintain their sensory profiles with a therapeutic input. A Music Therapist works with the students for one day per week and one TA trained in Communication runs 1:1 and small group sessions. The review team feels that the recommendation to further develop the 14 - 19 curriculum and extend the age appropriate activities and challenge of qualifications offered has been fully met. The team feels that the 14 - 19 curriculum is now a potential area of strength. Sources of Evidence: Written Documentation of: KS4/ 5 Curriculum Maps KS4 Overview Teaching and Learning Policy Interviews & Discussions with: Acting DHT Meeting with 14-19 Manager Observations: Class Observations Transitions between activities, classes Registration Breaks / lunch Area of Strength The review team feels that the recommendation to further develop the 14 - 19 curriculum and extend the age appropriate activities and challenge of qualifications offered has been fully met. The team feels that the 14 - 19 curriculum is now a potential area of strength. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 14 of 57 POTENTIAL AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT (if applicable) As identified in the IDR Potential Area 1 Standard: Specialist Methods Standard 4: Teaching/Learning – Fox Wood School considers that Intensive Interaction can be a valuable strategy in the development of social interaction and communication skills for many of its pupils with autism. Considerable time and funds are being invested in training staff in the use of Intensive Interaction techniques. The school is in the process of undertaking a focused and systematic programme of intervention with those pupils for whom this methodology is felt to be beneficial. ______________________________________________________ Fox Wood School is a specialist school for Communication and Interaction and as such the development of communication practice is given a high priority. The school’s ASD Policy states that all staff will receive training in Intensive Interaction. The Communication Policy includes an appendix which covers the principles and practice of the approach. The review team assess that the school has a significant number of pupils who are likely to benefit from Intensive Interaction. The school has invested in a considerable amount of training in Intensive Interaction. The Acting Head Teacher has undertaken an extended (21 day) course and several members of staff have attended shorter courses. All staff have received in school training delivered by the Acting Head Teacher in order to ensure that this approach is part of general practice within the school. This training has been carried out over a period of time allowing staff to gradually extend their understanding and share their experiences together. Staff report that the approach has helped to develop pupils communication skills and their involvement with class staff and peers. A member of the administration team commented that one pupil who had been quite withdrawn had begun to anticipate her morning greeting and to show greater awareness of this whereas previously she had not been sure whether he noticed this or not. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 15 of 57 There is a recording system for staff observations in order that the impact of the approach can be monitored. Training has also been delivered to parents and carers. The School Development Plan identifies further training in the area of Intensive Interaction as a task. This will support the extension of staff team’s growing skill in this area and ensure that the Intensive Interaction approach becomes fully embedded across the school. The review team also feel that this work would be of benefit to pupils with autism and as such see this as a potential area of development for the school. Sources of Evidence: Written Documentation of: Communication Policy School Development Plan Targets/Plans Self Audit Interviews & Discussions with: Acting Head Teacher Class Teams Teaching Assistants Meeting Observations: Classroom Observations Observations during breaks and transitions Areas for Development The School Development Plan identifies further training in the area of Intensive Interaction as a task. This will support the extension of staff team’s growing skill in this area and ensure that the Intensive Interaction approach becomes fully embedded across the school. The review team also feel that this work would be of benefit to pupils with autism and as such see this as a potential area of development for the school. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 16 of 57 Potential Area 2 Standard: Core Standard 6: Assessment, Reporting and Recording and Evaluation The school has introduced Person Centred Reviews in order to involve the young people in the planning and review of their targets and needs. Further development is now being undertaken in order to consider how this process can be more fully individualised in order to meet the individual needs of each pupil. ______________________________________________________ Since the Academic year 2012-13 Annual Reviews have been renamed ‘Person Centred Reviews’ (PCR) and all students are invited to attend or become more involved with their parents or carers. Students are given the opportunity to contribute either verbally, through photos and symbols and through the use of DVDs. The three areas of feedback from the students are ‘I like’, ‘I am good at’ and ‘I am working towards.’ In a KS3/4 class the students were encouraged to use these criteria when feeding back to their teacher / TA about their views on the task that they had been working on. The PCR documentation is very comprehensive with information regarding previous annual targets having been achieved or not, IEPs showing B squared / National Curriculum progress with success criteria linked to student responses on a scale of 0-4 ranging from no response to excellent response. There are documents covering specific detail about the student such as: ‘what do we like about x’ ‘what is important about x’ ‘what is important in the future for x’ and ‘what support does x need to be safe and healthy’. An Action Plan is drawn up that is time framed with a named person attached to each target. This plan can include medical, sensory and dietary needs as well as social, communication and academic targets. Parents are invited to contribute about what is working well at school and home and the student has an opportunity to put forward their views. The last School Annual Report is also included. Each term the parents sign IEP’S. There are 3 opportunities per year for parents to meet with the class teacher to review progress towards personalised targets. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 17 of 57 Feedback from parents is positive and they value the Reviews. They feel that they are kept well informed about their children’s’ progress. The review team feel that this recommendation to consider how the Person Centred Reviews can be more fully individualised in order to meet the individual needs of each pupil has been fully met. Sources of Evidence: Written Documentation of: ARR Policy AR/ PCRs IEPs/IBPs Tracking Documents Interviews & Discussions with: Acting HT / Assessment Meeting with Parents Observations: Classroom Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 18 of 57 POTENTIAL AREAS OF STRENGTH (if applicable) As identified in the IDR Potential Area 1 Standard: Specialist Standard 2: Teaching/Learning Programme/Curriculum and Activity Content – Fox Wood School provides all its pupils with the opportunity to experience an increasingly wide range of activities over one session per week. This session, or ‘enrichment’ as it is named, helps to develop flexibility of thought, social interaction and address sensory issues (all which feature on our ASD IEP). This session also utilises personal interests and brings with it an element of choice/choosing for the pupils too. ______________________________________________________ The content of enrichment sessions (in terms of what is on offer) has increased over the last two years. All sessions are evaluated by the lead member of staff in each group. The Enrichment sessions have been developing over a few years and are now well embedded into the curriculum. Sessions can be led by a teacher, teaching assistant or health professionals depending on the focus and expertise of staff and needs of the students. Every student has an enrichment experience for one session per week and some are guided into choosing activities. At the time of the Review students had access to Film Club, Eco Club, PE, *Sensory Circuit, Outdoor Trail/Activities, Skoog, *Healthy Living, Rebound, *Communication, Drama and Maths is guided Club. Sessions marked with an asterisk * are guided choice activities which enable therapists/teachers to give additional interventions to targeted students. The range of activities for enrichment is impressive and during 2013-14 eighteen different activities were made available for the students to experience. Enrichment groups take students from different classes so these sessions provide opportunities for generalisation of skills and social interaction with less familiar staff and students. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 19 of 57 The activities are well planned and motivating for the students. The Eco group were making bird feeders. The students were clearly enjoying mixing the feed and putting it into coconut shells or shaped cutters. The Outdoor Trail/ Activities group enjoyed finding and looking out for items / wildlife with the added motivator of a play session at the playground at the end of the walk. The sessions give older and younger students an opportunity to mix and offer different challenges. One student in Rebound was extremely motivated to use the trampoline but found the steps up to the equipment too daunting. The patient support from staff with the use of appropriate motivators meant she was able to make two steps and is likely to reach the trampoline next week. There is a wide range of resources that include photos, symbols, PECS, sensory materials, puppets, microphone, tents, ICT, cutters, mixers etc. All resources are bright and attractive and age appropriate. The review team agrees with the school’s view that the Enrichment curriculum which enhances opportunities for learning and supports flexibility of thought is a potential area of strength. Sources of Evidence: Written Documentation of: Self Audit Data from 2013/14 Short Term Planning Interviews & Discussions with: Acting Head Teacher Observations: 11 Enrichment activity observations Areas of Strength The review team agrees with the school’s view that the Enrichment curriculum which enhances opportunities for learning and supports flexibility of thought is a potential area of strength. Potential Area 2 Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 20 of 57 Standard: Core Standard 3: Professional Development and Staff Information Resource Training and Fox Wood School is committed to offering its staff a rigorous training regime. This takes the format of ‘Tuesday or Thursday night’ training/twilight sessions. This is usually ‘in-house’ provided and delivered by staff at Fox Wood but has also included sessions delivered by other local professionals e.g. SaLT, nurses, and OTs. The training programme has covered an extensive range of areas including: fire safety training, ladder training, person centred reviews, music therapy, and art therapy. Other more formal training opportunities give rise to the use of in-set days. Here we commit to areas such as; Team Teach, sensory issues, music for ASD pupils. ______________________________________________________ Fox Wood School endeavours to offer a broad range of first class, relevant training to its staff. This happens during a weekly training programme of twilight sessions for staff at all levels. Many autism related topics have been covered including: PECS, Makaton, Intensive Interaction, independence, narrow diets and behaviour. The ASD Policy states that all staff will be trained in PECS, TEACCH and Intensive Interaction in addition to ongoing training in autism awareness. During the review a member of the team met with a group of six teaching assistants. All were clear that the frequency and quality of training at the school is good. In addition to the training sessions offered they referred to the opportunity to discuss problems or raise questions with other members of staff within the class team or from the Leadership Team. Often problems are discussed during the morning briefing meeting and this approach supports consistency of practice in the school. Fox Wood School encourages staff to gain further qualifications and regularly funds all or part of the cost of these. One member of staff has gained a Masters degree in autism. The school has two Team Teach instructors and this helps to ensure that training in this area is kept up to date for all staff. The instructors also deliver this training in other schools which supports the training budget at Fox Wood School. Sources of Evidence: Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 21 of 57 Written Documentation of: Training Records Self Audit Interviews & Discussions with: Acting Head Teacher Teaching Assistants Class teams Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 22 of 57 REVIEW STANDARDS SPECIALIST STANDARD 1 Environment The physical environment is fit for purpose/suits its stated purpose and meets/is responsive to the needs of the people with autism. INDICATORS 1. There are policies, procedures, local protocol & guidelines that inform practice regarding the needs of people with autism in relation to their environment. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded Fox Wood School relocated to its current premises in September 2014 although the Post 16 Department made this move at an earlier date (February 2014). Previously a mainstream High School was on the site and part of this building has been extensively refurbished to provide for the Post 16 department, however the remainder of the school has been newly designed and built. On the same site but separately managed is another Special School which provides for pupils with MLD. There are some shared facilities between the two schools, for example a therapy room for Occupational Therapy and Sensory activities, some outdoor space and pupils from both schools join together in the new Post 16 College. One of the stated school aims is: to provide a safe, stimulating, fun environment. The Teaching and Learning Policy describes how the learning environment needs to be organised. There are a number of references to the visual environment, including displays, labelling and clearly demarked areas for learning. Fox Wood School’s ASD Policy states that the difficulties presented by pupils with ASD need to be: recognised and addressed in all aspects of their school life, including the environment… Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 23 of 57 There is some variation in classrooms, due to the needs of pupils as the school caters for a number of pupils with physical and medical needs. Groups of pupils are therefore placed in a class which is the most appropriate for them. The school has a number of ASD specific classrooms and these have workstations and follow a low arousal policy. All classrooms were assessed as being very well ordered with resources being kept in labelled (text and symbol) storage facilities. There are subject resource cupboards along the corridors so that resources can be shared across classes and are accessible without needing to disturb a class. As part of the school’s monitoring programme an annual audit of classroom environments is undertaken and written feedback is given to staff. This practice helps to ensure that policy is adhered to and gives an opportunity for staff to discuss the underlying reasons for a distraction free environment and ways of organising the layout and resources within a classroom. 2. The physical environment reflects policies, procedures, local protocol & guidelines and meets the needs of the people with autism. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded The new school buildings of Fox Wood School are of a high quality. Most striking is how light and spacious all areas feel. The school was built on a restricted budget and so features had to be prioritised. The result is an excellent facility, classrooms are large and well laid out. There is colour coding of door frames in particular to indicate the nature of the work that happens within the room, e.g. bathrooms are blue, classrooms yellow and therapy areas are green. Signage is also coded in line with this. This system is carried through to the Post 16 College which supports smooth transitions for students moving into this facility. The school has a range of specialist rooms and facilities and these include: ICT room and Library, a quiet withdrawal room to support pupils to regain emotional control, a sensory room, a hydrotherapy pool, medical and therapy rooms including an Occupational Therapy/Sensory activities room, and rooms for Music, Art and Food Technology. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 24 of 57 All classrooms have an Interactive Whiteboard and these were observed to be used for different purposes during the review. In general the school makes very good use of ICT resources: iPads, software programmes and internet resources and has a proactive approach to seeking the best of these. Windows in classrooms have blinds which can be closed in order to reduce distractions from outside and give shade when necessary. Labelling and visual strategies throughout the school are strong, for example in the dining hall there were visuals used to support pupils to wait in line and clear away their plates independently. As an example text and symbols for ‘think, what do you need?’ was placed next to the cutlery tray. The school has a secure outer perimeter and within the school there are areas where pupils can safely exercise independence, e.g. moving between classrooms and along some corridors. 3. The physical environment is used effectively to promote wellbeing and progress for the people with autism. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded All classrooms have access to an outside area. The school has two main areas which are used for breaks and lunchtimes, one for the lower school and one for the secondary department. These areas are well equipped, e.g. in the lower playground there are robust wooden climbing, play and seating facilities and areas are demarked by colour ‘soft surface’ areas and others which have an artificial turf surface. The secondary area has a road marked out with white paint and a range of specialist bikes which seem to be very popular. In both outside areas pupils were observed to be active and well supported by the adults present. The school has a large field which it shares with the adjacent special school. There are plans to develop this area into allotment and sporting areas. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 25 of 57 All rooms were seen to have furniture which was mainly coordinated in terms of style and colour which helped to provide a visually calm and low arousal environment. In the younger classes horseshoe tables are used for some activities where group teaching takes place. Display is carefully selected, limited and not placed where distraction is likely. In all cases it was well presented and purposeful in line with the school’s policy. Photographs on the doors of classroom show pupils who work in each room, this helps pupils to navigate around the school and understand how the school is organised. Within classrooms where personal information needs to be accessible for all staff it is displayed discretely, this is in line with the school’s strong regard for the dignity of pupils. Whilst not all classes have a majority of pupils with autism within them all classrooms are suitable for these pupils. The school recognises that approaches that have been developed specifically for pupils with autism are also of value to other pupils with differing special needs. Therefore all classes were seen to have distinct areas for social sessions such as greetings, a group work area, an area for independent working which might include a number of work stations and a quiet area. Nearly every classroom has a large bathroom attached to it and many have a medical room so that pupils with higher needs can be cared for without having to visit another part of the school. Older pupils are encouraged to use the main school toilets and not those in the classroom as part of their independence programme. The school has undertaken a considerable amount of work to develop its approach to sensory issues and staff are now able to understand how to adapt the environment to take these factors into account, e.g. by seating a pupil away from a stimulus that might be distracting or making sensory items available in a marked box so that pupils can access them as they identify their need for these. 4. People with autism are able to function effectively within the physical environment and their well-being is enhanced. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded Parents commented during the meeting held for them that they found the school to have a calm and spacious feel which they felt benefitted their children. One parent had been concerned about the move from the old school where her son had been very settled however he settled without difficulty and she felt this was down to Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 26 of 57 the expertise of the staff supporting him as well as the quality of the new environment. The school has a calm environment where problem behaviour is not very evident and where it was observed by the review team it was seen to be responded to promptly, by confident staff that were effective in supporting pupils to regain control and return to the set task. The review team view the spacious, calm, well planned and well ordered environment which has been created at Fox Wood School to be of great benefit to pupils with autism and identify this as a potential strength of the school. Sources of Evidence: Written Documentation of: ASD Policy Teaching and Learning Policy School Aims Self Audit Interviews & Discussions with: Acting Head Teacher Acting Deputy Head Teacher Occupational Therapist Observations: Scrutiny of the Environment Areas of Strength The review team view the spacious, calm, well planned and well ordered environment which has been created at Fox Wood School to be of great benefit to pupils with autism and identify this as a potential strength of the school. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 27 of 57 SPECIALIST STANDARD 2 Teaching/Learning - Programme/Curriculum and Activity Content The programme/curriculum and the content of activities are informed by an understanding of autism/takes into account the needs of the people with autism. INDICATORS 1. Within policies, procedures, local protocol & guidelines there is a clear written description of the needs of people with autism in relation to the programme/curriculum and the content of activities. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded The School Policies on Teaching and Learning, ASD and Communication give clear guidelines on how best to teach students with autism and how their needs can be met through the curriculum. There is a very comprehensive Behaviour Policy that makes specific reference to the needs of students with autism. There are Curriculum Maps that ensure breadth and balance. Medium and Short Term Planning are very detailed, clearly differentiated and include Learning Objectives, Personalised Targets and Assessment. The Curriculum, based on the National Curriculum, follows a thematic approach throughout all Key Stages. This helps the students to make links between subjects and deepen their understanding. In Key Stage 4 the accreditation is linked in with opportunities for life skills and independence. All students have IEPs but students with autism have additional targets that address areas of difficulty that are commonly associated with autism. These are supported with guidelines to support the strengths and difficulties that students may encounter. Some students have IBPs. All documentation is reviewed termly with the student and their parents. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 28 of 57 All students have a Person Centred Review each year that looks at qualitative and quantitative evidence of progress. Students are given the opportunity to record their experience of school over the previous year in whatever way that is appropriate to them. 2. The programme/curriculum and the content of sessions reflect policies, procedures, local protocol & guidelines and are informed by the needs of people with autism. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded The School has created a very successful communicative environment. Whole school communication strategies are in place and practice is consistent from class to class. To maintain consistency communication is monitored regularly by the Senior Leadership Team. All learning is supported with visual timetables, cues, photos, symbols and objects of reference to provide support and clarity. In addition sensory materials enhance the experience and keep the students focused on learning. In one lesson two young students used a visual strip with photos to support turn taking and in the same lesson in order to encourage whole class turn taking, when queueing, students were given symbols with ‘1st’, 2nd’ etc. which they had to match with the same one on the floor and stand in that place. In another lesson students were learning about the Antarctic and were encouraged to touch snow, ice and cold gel to help them understand the climate. Opportunities are built in for social interaction and students are encouraged to communicate with their peers as much as possible. In registration students can choose or are directed to shake hands and say hello to another. The skilled use of minimal language to manage behaviour is very consistent across the school. Students are given regular feedback on their learning. This ranges from individual praise to whole class celebration with achievement being shared. Students are also encouraged to feedback on their own learning. Different examples included symbols with ‘good work/not so good work’, ‘I like that/ I don’t like that’. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 29 of 57 The feedback for the Person Centred Reviews gives each student a voice to say how he /she feels about school and their learning. Students are given opportunities to generalise their skills by shopping in the local community, taking part in curriculum visits to museums and exhibitions and joining in themed weeks. The school used to offer residential visits and may reintroduce these when the school has settled into the new building. 3. The programme/curriculum and the content of activities promote the independence, well-being and progress of the individuals with autism. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded All students have access to the whole curriculum including the National Curriculum. Students in the Early Years follow the Foundation Stage Curriculum. In addition the Enrichment Activities introduce them to new areas and different challenges. This Enrichment Programme helps students to be more flexible with their learning environment (they have to change classroom), interacting with less familiar adults (they may not have their own teacher and TAs) and their learning (the topic may make demands that take them out of their comfort zone). There are a wide range of activities that include food technology, photography, rebound, film club, Eco club etc. Where appropriate students have therapeutic interventions and these may happen in class or on a 1:1 basis. Older students follow internal and external accreditation, take part in citizenship days, enterprise and work experience. Identified students can access communication groups that are led by TAs who are trained in working with: AAC, chat groups, narrative therapy and social skills. Developing independence for life skills is promoted across the school for day to day tasks such as students taking the register, showing others when the lesson is finished, undertaking daily responsibilities, clearing up and keeping timetables up to date. The Review Team felt that students may benefit from more opportunities for independent work in subject lessons to consolidate learning. Differentiation is very evident across all classes. Activities are broken down into short tasks with sensory strategies as Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 30 of 57 appropriate. In a literacy lesson students were given access to a wide range of different textures, including gel, foam, paint, fakegrass, and encouraged to mark make and write letters. In Maths club students were given putty to squeeze and roll. There were bubbles, flakes and sensory and tactile toys. In ‘Skoog for older students’ the learning was personalised with one student able to make music on the computer, another using the skoog with physical support from a TA and another creating music from a multi coloured set of bells. Across the school teachers and TAs work seamlessly ensuring that students are on task and maximising learning opportunities. All adults use differentiated questioning including symbols, photos, objects of reference, to involve students in their own learning. The use of motivators is evident throughout the school. Students respond positively to the model of ‘work then choosing’. Staff teams know their students well and what they like, so motivators are well received by the students. The quality of resources is high with many students using adapted books to help them learn a new skill. Displays of targets, timetables and information are of high quality, clear and well presented. 4. The people with autism respond positively to the programme/curriculum and the content of activities and maintain skills or make progress. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded All students present as happy and pleased to be in school. In the summary of Key findings in Ofsted it is quoted: ‘Pupils clearly enjoy coming to school evidenced by their happy smiles as they greet staff on arrival.’ ‘I love coming to school and learning things because the teachers make lessons fun’ Students are encouraged to indicate if they have enjoyed lessons and if they have met set targets. The management of behaviour across the school is outstanding. The quality of behaviour plans is high and care is taken to ensure Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 31 of 57 that all staff work consistently to apply the same positive strategies so that the young person can settle and learn effectively. Motivation is high and students stay on task and are eager to complete activities successfully. Parents are very positive about their children’s enjoyment of school. Students make good progress through their autism specific IEPs. Progress with B squared and National Curriculum Assessments is good. The atmosphere in the school is calm, purposeful and positive and conducive to learning and student wellbeing. Sources of Evidence: Written Documentation of: Teaching and Learning Policy ASD Policy Behaviour Policy IEPs IBPs Ofsted report 2014 Curriculum Maps Medium/short term planning Person Centred Reviews Interviews & Discussions with: Acting Head Teacher Acting Deputy Head Teacher KS3/4 Manager Class Teams Observations: Classroom / lessons Enrichment activities Transitions Arrival and departure Lunch/breaks Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 32 of 57 SPECIALIST STANDARD 3 Teaching/Learning – Activity Organisation & Resources There is a planned approach to the organisation of activities and resources that takes into account the needs of people with autism. INDICATORS 1. There are policies, procedures, local protocol & guidelines that inform practice regarding the organisation of activities and resources in relation to the needs of people with autism. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded There is a Teaching and Learning Policy that makes reference to the expected session organisation. There is an ASD Policy that outlines the impact of autism on students and how their needs can be best met through session organisation. The school also has a CPD Policy which describes opportunities for staff to learn from each other and inform practice. The Fox Wood ‘I Matter Code’ provides guidelines for staff regarding approach when working with students with autism. This is displayed in all classrooms. Some IEPs and IBPs identify resources that may support students with autism to access the curriculum. The medium and short term planning documents include reference to organisation and resources (including human resources). All classes have clear visual timetables that ensure students know what to expect throughout the day. Students have individual timetables that help with their organisation and prepare them for what they have to do. Symbols are used throughout the day to help students know when sessions have finished and to aid transitions. Health and Safety Risk Assessments help with the organisation of activities and guide the level of staffing required. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 33 of 57 2. The organisation of activities and resources reflects policies, procedures, local protocol & guidelines and takes into account the needs of people with autism. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded Lessons are well planned and most begin with an introduction delivered to the whole class seated in a circle. This gives students an opportunity to be in a learning situation and communicate with, or listen to their peers. Most students respond to these sessions well and have developed good sitting, listening and waiting skills. The interactive white board is used effectively during these circletime sessions to introduce a topic or show images whilst music is playing during ‘chill out’. The main body of the lessons include 1:1, paired and small group activities. For these sessions the work is highly differentiated to ensure that students work on their individual targets and that they are able to access the main learning points from the lesson. In Music in KS1 students the activities were organised in such a way that students could access the curriculum either independently or with support. In many sessions there is a plenary where students’ achievements are celebrated. The school has a high staff/student ratio and so independent work can be a challenge as students have immediate access to an adult. This is successfully achieved in some sessions and the Review Team felt that the school may benefit from this good practice being shared across classes. Students receive professional and quality staff support. All staff use visual communication strategies effortlessly and demonstrate high levels of skill in delivering appropriate 1:1 sessions. Staff are sensitive to the students’ needs and give them time to process information and respond to questions and demands. All Classes are impressively well organised and equipped. There is consistency in terms of layout, displays and visual support. Students have a wide, motivating and age appropriate range of resources available to them to support learning. There are also appropriate sensory and therapeutic resources to support students learning, sensory needs and wellbeing. The ongoing updating of resources has been a target in the School Development Plan for this year looking at improved resources for PE for primary students, more relevant resources for KS3, additional resources to support KS4, resources to encourage independence in the dining room and a significant investment in ICT, switches, iPads and laptops. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 34 of 57 The Review Team feels that the priority that the school has placed on organisation and high quality autism specific resources means this is a potential area of strength. 3. The organisation of activities and resources promotes the wellbeing and progress of people with autism. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded All students have access to the whole curriculum including the National Curriculum. Students in the Early Years follow the Foundation Stage Curriculum. In addition the Enrichment Activities introduce them to new areas and different challenges. This Enrichment Programme helps students to be more flexible with their learning environment (they have to change classroom), their adults (they may not have their own teacher and TAs) and their learning (the topic may make demands that take them out of their comfort zone). There are a wide range of activities that include food technology, photography, rebound, film club, Eco club etc. Where appropriate students have therapeutic interventions and these may happen in class or on a 1:1 basis, these include: Occupational Therapy, Music Therapy and Communication support. Older students follow internal and external accreditation programmes, take part in citizenship days, enterprise and work experience. Identified students can access communication groups that are led by TAs who are trained in working with AAC, chat groups, narrative therapy and social skills. Developing independence for life skills is promoted across the school for day to day tasks such as students taking the register, showing others when the lesson is finished, undertaking daily responsibilities, clearing up and keeping timetables up to date. The Review Team feels that the School may wish to build on already established good practice for developing independence, to improve and extend opportunities for independent work in lessons, to support and consolidate learning and see this as a potential area for development. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 35 of 57 Differentiation is very evident across all classes. Activities are broken down into short tasks with sensory strategies as appropriate. In a literacy lesson students were given access to a wide range of different textures, including gel, foam, paint, fakegrass, and encouraged to mark make and write letters. In Maths club students were either given putty to squeeze and roll. There were bubbles, flakes and sensory and tactile toys. In ‘Skoog for older students’ the learning was personalised with one student able to make music on the computer, another using the skoog with physical support from a TA and another creating music from a multi coloured set of bells. Across the school teachers and TAs work seamlessly ensuring that students are on task and maximising learning opportunities. All adults use differentiated questioning including symbols, photos, objects of reference, to involve students in their own learning. The use of motivators is evident throughout the school. Students respond positively to the model of ‘work then choosing’. Staff teams know their students well and what they like, so motivators are well received by the students. The quality of resources is high with many students using adapted books to help them learn a new skill. Displays of targets, timetables and information are of high quality, clear and well presented. 4. The people with autism respond positively to the activity and the resources used and make progress. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded In all lessons the students have a positive response to resources that are used to support tasks. In particular they enjoy real objects as they bring the activity to life. In the drama enrichment club young pupils were highly motivated by the puppet used to help sing the ‘welcome’ song. In a geography lesson the bear that was going on his holidays to the Antarctic was very popular. The move to the new school has meant that the trampoline can be left out and students can benefit from Rebound Therapy more regularly. The new outdoor play equipment offers exciting and challenging opportunities for creative play. The new therapy room has bright and stimulating resources that support students’ Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 36 of 57 individual programmes. The school has a Hydrotherapy pool which is due to be opened to students soon. Lessons observed through school internal monitoring have demonstrated that students are actively engaged in the curriculum and most lessons are now able to be graded good or outstanding using Ofsted criteria. The School has curriculum teams that meet regularly to review progress within the curriculum and audit resources. Resources used for communication are available across the school. Students make good progress during their time at Fox Wood School. At the parents’ meeting one parent described her child as a changed person and another said that the incidents of aggression with her child were now virtually non-existent. Sources of Evidence: Written Documentation of: Teaching and Learning Policy ASD Policy CPD Policy ‘I Matter’ code Risk Assessments School Audit Medium / Short term planning IEPs/IBPs CPD staff file Interviews & Discussions with: Acting Head Teacher Acting Deputy Head Teacher Observations: Class / lessons Enrichment Area of Strength The Review Team feels that the priority that the school has placed on organisation and high quality autism specific resources means this this is a potential area of strength. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 37 of 57 Area for Development Developing independence for life skills is promoted across the school for day to day tasks such as students taking the register, showing others when the lesson is finished, undertaking daily responsibilities, clearing up and keeping timetables up to date. The Review Team feels that the School may wish to build on already established good practice for developing independence, to improve and extend opportunities for independent work in lessons, to support and consolidate learning and see this as a potential area for development. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 38 of 57 SPECIALIST STANDARD 4 Teaching/Learning – Methods There is a range of methods and approaches used with people with autism that respond to their needs and are informed by a knowledge and understanding of autism. INDICATORS 1. There are policies, procedures, local protocol & guidelines that inform practice regarding the approaches and methods used with the people with autism. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded The school’s ASD Policy places importance on staff having a good knowledge and understanding of autism and how established interventions and approaches can be used. The policy also gives a clear overview of ASD including the sensory difficulties that may be seen. The core approaches used by the school are given as: TEACCH, PECS and Intensive Interaction. The school’s Teaching and Learning Policy is a very comprehensive policy which gives extensive guidance for good practice. In particular it includes a detailed appendix on ‘Aspects of Learning’ and many of these are very significant for learners with autism: Problem Solving Reasoning Evaluation Self A wareness Managing Feelings Motivation Empathy Social Skills Communication This forms a valuable resource particularly for new staff. Fox Wood School has an ‘I Matter Code’ which prompts staff to remember key points for good practice; it is displayed in all classrooms and contains statements such as: I need you to recognise my anxieties. I need the same structure and approach in every classroom that I’m in. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 39 of 57 Help me to stay safe. I need you to say my name before you talk to me. There are Communication and Behaviour Policies which also inform practice. 2. The approaches and methods used reflect policies, procedures, local protocol & guidelines and take into account the needs of people with autism. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded An understanding of the significant positive impact that structure can have on creating an effective learning experience for pupils with autism underpins the approach seen at Fox Wood School. Alongside this is an understanding of pupils’ individual needs which results in strong differentiation and a broad range of techniques being used, i.e. tools to support communication: signing, PECS, visual systems, modified language, electronic communication devices from switches to more complex aids. This was demonstrated in a greetings session with a younger class, all the pupils were at different levels of communication development however the session was cohesive, involved opportunities for social communication between peers and celebration of each pupil’s achievement. Resources were all to hand and the teacher switched between these in a very seamless manner. The review team felt that the school has very strong practice in the area of communication and interaction as has partly been discussed earlier in this report. Differentiation of communication systems was seen to be carried out with expertise. Visual support is used well, e.g. red and green circles to depict ‘finished’ and ‘it’s time for’ as well as a yellow one for ‘nearly finished or nearly time for’. All staff have a key ring set of symbols which they are able to use to prompt pupils in a non-verbal manner these include the traffic lights, and symbols such as: wait, stop, quiet. Staff showed skill in modifying their language according to the learner’s level of understanding and processing time. Often staff intervened silently and effectively. Social Stories are seen as a useful strategy to support pupil’s understanding of a range of social situations and often helping them to manage a difficulty in a more appropriate manner, examples seen during the review include: going from school to home and the fire drill. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 40 of 57 The school recognises the value of training experiences for staff at all levels and aspects of this have been referred to previously in this report. The level of training for approaches such as TEACCH, PECS, Communication Approaches, Behaviour Management and distinct strategies such as Social Stories is high. This training has resulted in practice which is clearly underpinned by good levels of understanding. During registration sessions pupils are reminded of the ‘colour of the day’ and the ‘smell of the day’ this is a sensory approach which supports pupils to feel more organised and gives familiarity to the start of the school day and is used consistently across the school. Pupils were regularly asked to comment on their experiences in a session, this might take the form of some simple verbal discussion or indicating a choice of ‘like / didn’t like’ symbols. This was one of many features which were seen to be consistent across all classes. 3. The approaches and strategies promote the well-being and progress of people with autism. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded The Ofsted report (May 2014) comments that: Staff are highly skilled at understanding pupils’ often very complex needs. The school is able to offer some medical appointments in school, e.g. optician and dental appointments. Some clinics are also held in school. This practice allows pupils to have essential medical appointments and assessments in a familiar and more predictable environment. The school is co-located with an MLD Special School and links are being gradually developed between the schools. Currently one pupil is integrating with this school for two sessions per week. Some joint activities have taken place, for example a shared Christmas meal and writes to visiting pantos with classes from both schools and joint use of a soft play facility. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 41 of 57 The school uses home/school diaries to communicate with parents. Comments about these in the parent questionnaires were positive and this view was repeated by parents in the meeting held during the review. All parents said they felt their child was well understood by staff at school and one commented that the school felt like an extension to her family. Of particular note was the exceptional work the school has done on extending some pupils’ very restrictive diets. This work was begun by the Acting Deputy Head Teacher some years ago and has been cascaded down to a strong group of staff who work persistently and patiently in a skilled manner with pupils at lunch and snack times. Although progress takes time it is significant and once this is seen in school the work is transferred to home and parents reported that this has been greatly appreciated, due to the impact it has on family life as well as the health of the pupil. This work was seen in progress at lunch times during the review, as an example some pupils try small amounts of school meals before then eating their preferred packed lunch. A flexible and sensitive approach is key to the success of these programmes and this has become part of the core work of the school. On admission pupils’ eating patterns are discussed with families and where there are seen to be difficulties intervention programmes are planned. One of the approaches seen in the school was the use of spots on the floor for lining up, this helps to give pupils sufficient space between each other. In the Dining Hall this was judged to be very effective, there are red, yellow and then green spots which indicate position in the queue and waiting time. The school places an emphasis on managing behaviour effectively and this is set out in the Behaviour Policy. Practice in this area is viewed as strong. All staff displayed a clear understanding of the strategies that had been agreed for a pupil and these were often applied jointly by staff without the need for any verbal discussion before or after an intervention. Pupils who require it have an Individual Behaviour Plan (IBP), these documents have been well thought through and are very comprehensive. Behaviours are categorised into level 1, 2, and 3 and strategies into proactive, active and reactive. Further to this there are suggestions for recovery actions, e.g. offer a drink and a debrief section. The IBP is part of an overall Behaviour Management Plan which consists of the Individual Behaviour Target, the IBP, a Positive Handling Plan, Risk Assessment and monitoring log. Processes for supporting positive behaviour are very clear for staff; there is a termly Behaviour Bulleting which ensures that all staff are aware of concerns for all pupils. Practice is described in a small flyer for parents. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 42 of 57 All plans are shared with senior staff and parents. Monitoring of behaviour is strong and this is analysed to identify patterns and progress. Reward systems support pupil motivation and on task behaviour. Systems are individualised within classes according to levels of ability and age. Some pupils have clear working towards strips which show their preferred activity which might be offered at the end of a session or the day. For some pupils the reward might be a certificate in assembly rather than a classroom activity. In several classes ‘happy’ and ‘sad’ circles were on the wall and pupils photographs would be moved according to their behaviour and this had an impact on reward opportunities. The review team assess the level of consistency of approach and strong practice seen in the school particularly in the areas of behaviour support and interaction to be a potential area of strength. 4. The people with autism respond positively to the approaches and methods used and make progress. Not Met Partially Met Met Met & Exceeded During the parents’ meeting one parent gave an example of how the school goes an extra mile to understand and support pupils and their families. The parent was very concerned about the imminent birth of her daughter and how this would affect her son who often showed aggressive behaviour and had very little understanding of language with which to explain the change that was going to happen within the family. The school recognised that the parent was understandably anxious and arranged for a baby to visit the school to enable the pupil to become more familiar with babies and develop some understanding of what it would be like to have a baby at home. In the event the siblings get along well and the parent feels the school has played an important role in this. Staff and pupils appear to be enjoying their work at Fox Wood School, staff happily communicated their delight at pupil progress. Parents also reported their surprise at the progress their children had made which they had not anticipated, e.g. one parent said their young son had quite rapidly progressed from having no speech to being quite verbal and commented on how this had helped with some previously difficult behaviours and frustrations. The review team assess staff to show a thorough knowledge and understanding of autism and see this as the foundation to very Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 43 of 57 effective relationships between staff and pupils. It is evident that pupils generally trust staff and are happy at school. One parent described how his daughter would often put on her uniform during the school holiday communicating her enjoyment of school. Overall the school places a strong emphasis on pupil well-being and the review team judge this to be a potential strength of the school. Sources of Evidence: Written Documentation of: ASD Policy Teaching and Learning Policy Communication Policy Behaviour Policy Self Audit Interviews & Discussions with: Acting Head Teacher Acting Deputy Head Teacher Occupational Therapist Speech and Language Therapist Class Teams Observations: Classroom observations Observations during breaks and transitions Areas of Strength The review team assess the level of consistency of approach and strong practice seen in the school particularly in the areas of behaviour support and interaction to be a potential area of strength. During the review the team assessed staff to show a thorough knowledge and understanding of autism and saw this as the foundation to very effective relationships between staff and pupils. It was evident that pupils generally trust staff and are happy at school. Overall the school places a strong emphasis on pupil well-being and the review team judge this to be a potential strength of the school. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 44 of 57 SUMMARY OBSERVATIONS OBSERVATION SCORES Number of observations completed: Environment Activity Content Activity Organisation and Resources Methods TOTALS PERCENTAGES 20 NOT MET PARTIALLY MET MET MET & EXCEEDED 0 0 0 0 20 18 0 2 0 1 14 5 0 0 0% 1 2 2% 15 67 84% 4 11 14% 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Not Met Partially Met Met Environment Activity Content Activity Organisation & Resources Methods Met & Exceeded Comments: Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 45 of 57 During the review the team recorded 20 separate observations of practice. The high quality of practice seen in these is reflected in the scores. Practice was consistent and carefully focused to meet individual needs. Statements: On the one occasion where practice was judged to be less than met this was due to the planning of the session resulting in pupils having a long time to wait for their turn without an alternative activity being provided. In some observations practice was seen to exceed standards. Examples of this included a lesson where there was excellent differentiation within the activity supported by a very appropriate range of resources. In another example the teacher used a wide range of communication tools and autism specific methodology. In many observations adults were seen to move seamlessly between supporting activities and behaviour resulting in a calm and purposeful learning environment. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 46 of 57 QUESTIONNAIRES SCORES Number of Questionnaires sent out (information provided by the school): Number of Questionnaires returned: Number of sections not scored (figures only reflect sections scored): Contact Support Advice Involvement TOTALS PERCENTAGES 12 0 VERY UNHAPPY UNHAPPY SATISFIED HAPPY VERY HAPPY 0 0 0 1 1 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0% 1 0 1 2 4 8% 5 6 5 4 20 42% 6 6 6 5 23 48% 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Very Unhappy Unhappy Satisfied Happy Very Happy Contact Pupil Support Advice/Assistance Offered Involvement in Planning Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 47 of 57 Comments: The responses received graded 90% of the scores on the questionnaires as ‘happy’ or ‘very happy’. Most of the questionnaires didn’t include comments, but those that were made are included below. Statements included: Contact: Good contact via the school diary book which is sent home every day and phone call if there is any problem. The school do write in the book but don’t ever put about what she has done just put ‘been happy today’ but I want to know what she has done, i.e. painting, story time etc. what she liked/didn’t like. Xxxxx has only been with me a short time but someone has been available for me to speak to and have contacted me when Xxxxx was unsettled due to a lot of changes in his homelife. They reassured me that he was settled well in school. Communication with the school is very good, I have no concerns. Support: I find it really helpful that there is a school nurse who will do some blood tests. School always ask how Xxxxx has been and support him fully in unsettled/upset etc. I have no concerns about the support the school gives my child. He has improved many things, but he still doesn’t talk a lot. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 48 of 57 Advice: Unsure as I feel they have her best interests first, but they don’t give advice as to what I could do at home to help her. I am very new to Xxxxx’s level of autism and school are always available to offer advice and reassurance. I think the school does everything it can to advise and support all parents/guardians. School keep me fully informed about Xxxxx’s day in his homeschool diary. They are fully approachable if I need to ask about what he’s done during the day. Involvement: Other than a timetable to say what subject they are doing they don’t tell me how they are teaching it so I can’t do it at home, if they did I feel this would benefit my child. I think the school does what it thinks is necessary. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 49 of 57 AREAS OF STRENGTH Specialist Standard 1: Teaching/Learning – Environment The review team view the spacious, calm, well planned and well ordered environment which has been created at Fox Wood School to be of great benefit to pupils with autism and identify this as a potential strength of the school. Standard: Methods Specialist Standard 4: Teaching/Learning – During the review the team assessed staff to show a thorough knowledge and understanding of autism and saw this as the foundation to very effective relationships between staff and pupils. It was evident that pupils generally trust staff and are happy at school. Overall the school places a strong emphasis on pupil well-being and the review team judge this to be a potential strength of the school. Standard: Methods Specialist Standard 4: Teaching/Learning – The review team assess the level of consistency of approach and strong practice seen in the school particularly in the areas of behaviour support and interaction to be a potential area of strength. Specialist Standard 2: Teaching/Learning Programme/Curriculum and Activity Content – The review team agrees with the school’s view that the Enrichment curriculum which enhances opportunities for learning and supports flexibility of thought is a potential area of strength. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 50 of 57 Specialist Standard 2: Teaching and Learning Programme/Curriculum and Activity Content The review team feels that the recommendation to further develop the 14 - 19 curriculum and extend the age appropriate activities and challenge of qualifications offered has been fully met. The team feels that the 14 - 19 curriculum is now a potential area of strength. Specialist Standard 3: Teaching and Learning - Activity Organisation and Resources The Review Team feels that the priority that the school has placed on organisation and high quality autism specific resources means this this is a potential area of strength. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 51 of 57 AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT Standard: Methods Specialist Standard 4: Teaching/Learning – The School Development Plan identifies further training in the area of Intensive Interaction as a task. This will support the extension of the staff team’s growing skill in this area and ensure that the Intensive Interaction approach becomes fully embedded across the school. The review team feel that this work would be of benefit to pupils with autism and as such see this as a potential area of development for the school. Specialist Standard 3: Teaching and Learning - Activity Organisation and Resources Developing independence for life skills is promoted across the school for day to day tasks such as students taking the register, showing others when the lesson is finished, undertaking daily responsibilities, clearing up and keeping timetables up to date. The Review Team feels that the School may wish to build on already established good practice for developing independence, to improve and extend opportunities for independent work in lessons, to support and consolidate learning and see this as a potential area for development. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 52 of 57 APPENDIX SCHOOL COMMENTS Please note that comments must only pertain to the report and not to the performance of the review team. Any feedback on the performance of the review team must be sent separately to the Accreditation office on the Review Team Evaluation form at the end of your review. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 53 of 57 PANEL REPORT Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 54 of 57 TERMINOLOGY The Audit Programme may be applied to services for people with autism spectrum disorders. In this folder the word ‘autism’ is used to apply to the whole spectrum, including Asperger syndrome, so that unwieldy phrasing is avoided. Similarly, to avoid repetition of alternative titles, generic terms have been used throughout the text. To be consistent with the Care Standards ACT 2000 UK, this document refers the term Autism Spectrum Disorders, whilst recognising that some may refer to this as Autistic Spectrum Conditions. Accredited: When a service/school has successfully completed their self audit, IDR and review and is awarded accredited status by the Accreditation Panel. Advanced Documentation: Self-evaluation documents that include the pen picture describing the establishment, the Core Standards and the Specialist Standards. It is to be completed and updated regularly by service/school and submitted in preparation for an Autism Accreditation review. It includes recommendations from the previous panel report (recorded under Development Need), the Core Standards, and the Specialist Standards (recorded under Self Audit). Areas for Development: Term used by the Advisor (within the IDR-summarised under further action to be taken) and Review Team (within review report) describing areas for improvement. To be highlighted for the Panel to consider as Recommendations. Areas of Strength: Term used by the Advisor (within the IDR) and Review Team (within review report) describing aspects of strong practice within the service/school locally to be highlighted for the Panel to consider as Good Practice or Commendation. Autism: Term used to apply to the whole spectrum, including Asperger syndrome. Carer(s): Term used to refer to parents, guardians and other family members that are responsible and care for a person with autism. Commendation: Determined by the Panel from areas of strength that reflects outstanding practice within the service/school. Deferred: Status of service/school determined by the Panel. Neither not Accredited nor Accredited for a maximum of 6 months until recommendations from the panel have been addressed. A re-visit will be arranged in which a second report will be produced on these recommendations, no IDR required. This report will then be presented to the Panel to determine whether Accredited status can be granted or not. Good Practice: Determined by the Panel from areas of strength within the service/school that reflects good practice within the membership of Autism Accreditation. Interim Development Report (IDR): Report completed by the Accreditation Advisor and service/school at the 18 month visit and includes further actions, key documents and areas of potential strength. Key Documents: Is a binder/file that remains at the service/school as a reference tool. It includes proof of evidence that supports the self-audit and advanced documentation and includes items such as policies, procedures, local protocols, guidelines, brochures, handbooks, and manuals. The key documents file is maintained on a regularly basis at the service/school to be available if required by the Accreditation Advisor or the review team. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 55 of 57 Not Accredited: Accredited status not granted or removed by the Panel after the service/school review. No IDR required, but there will be a minimum of 12 months before the next review. Panel: Makes the judgement on whether there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate whether the service/school meets the criteria for accredited status. The Panel consists of a representative from the Accreditation department and a minimum of two individuals from a pool of professionals selected based on their expertise and qualification in the field of autism. Panel members are selected based on their area of expertise as it relates to the type of service/school being reviewed and any potential conflicts of interest with the specific service/school presented at the Panel meeting. Pen Picture: A factual description/overview of the service/school(s) being reviewed that forms section B of the Advanced Documentation (see page 18). Accreditation Advisor agrees and completes at initial visit with the service/school and updated as necessary. This document is required as part of the final self audit submission. Person with Autism: Any individual who is using a service/school, including pupil, student, client, customer, resident, or service user. Policies, Procedures, Local Protocols and Guidelines: Documents which establish the groundwork for good practice and which refer to or evidence methodologies developed to successfully support the needs of people with autism e.g. Individual Plans, or Transition Policy. Procedures Manual: Autism Accreditation programme’s review process manual, describing mission statement, overview of the Department, Accreditation Advisor role and specifics of the review process. Recommendations: Determined by the Panel from areas for development within the service/school that reflect areas of concern within the membership of Autism Accreditation. Registered: When a service/school registers with Autism Accreditation and begins the process of completing the self audit in preparation for the IDR and review with the prospect of being awarded accredited status. Self-Audit: Is the self-evaluation documents of Core Standards and Specialist Standards. They are to be completed and updated regularly by service/school and submitted for every IDR and review. As described in the Advanced Documentation above. Service/School: Includes all types of organisations and schools that provide education, care or support for people with autism. Service/School Manager: Any person who has the direct management responsibility for a service/school, including Principal, Head Teacher, Manager, General Manager and Home Manager. Service/School Provider: Any organisation or individual that owns a service/school, including local/education authorities, health authorities, trusts, national charities, local charities and private organisations. Specialist Standards: including: Separate Standards for areas of service/school provided, Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 56 of 57 Playscheme Children’s Home Day Schools Residential Schools Colleges and Continuing Education Services Adult Day Services Adult Residential Services Secure Residential NHS and Independent Hospitals Educational Outreach Support Services Community Outreach Fostering Agencies Employment Short Break and Shared Care Supported Living Standards: A set of Core and Specialist requirements set by the Accreditation Standards Body. The Standards are the basis that: The service/school uses for their self-evaluation for the self-audit document; The IDR is compiled through the self audit and other key documents The review team makes their observations to compile their review report. Standards Body: Establish and review the Standards annually. The Standards Body consists of individuals recognised for their high achievement, expertise and qualification in the field of autism research and practice. There names are listed on our website www.autism.org.uk. Statutory Requirements: These include all statutory and legislative bodies’ requirements that must be met in order for care provision to be allowed in the United Kingdom. They include CQC, OFSTED, HMie, Health & Safety Executive Council etc. The use of these terms avoids duplication of documents and also ensures consistency of terminology throughout the text. Autism Accreditation Review Report – Day/Res School or College 2011 Page 57 of 57
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz