ARTHROPOD BIOLOGY Head Capsule Width and Instar Determination for Larvae of Streblote panda (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) D. CALVO1,2 AND J. MA. MOLINA2 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 101(5): 881Ð886 (2008) ABSTRACT The moth Streblote panda Hübner (1820) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) is an ornamental and fruit plant pest in southwestern Andalusia. Analysis of head capsule width of 387 larvae reared on different host plants (Pistacea lentisco L., Arbutus unedo L., Citrus reticulata Blanco, Retama sphaerocarpa (L.) Boiss, Spartium junceum L., Tamarix gallica L., and Vaccinium spp.) indicates that growth rate between instars does not Þt well to DyarÕs rule. The number of instars varied from 5 to 8. Head capsule width could be used directly to determine developmental stage of individual in almost all host plants used. Only for larvae fed on S. junceum, R. sphaerocarpa, Vaccinium corymbosum L. ÔSharpblueÕ, and Vaccinium ashei Reade ÔBonitaÕ, beyond third instar, did the range of measurements overlap. These data were analyzed using a combination of statistical methods. A nonlinear leastsquares approach was used to determine width means and ranges for each instar, and misclassiÞcation probabilities were calculated for each overlapping instar using Z statistics for all head capsule widths. Various factors are discussed to explain the results. KEY WORDS Streblote panda, DyarÕs rule, instars, developmental stage, southwestern Andalusia Determination of instar distribution can provide important information for pest management (Daly 1985). Spray applications usually are done during a particular stage of larval development to be effective. For example, Bacillus thuringiensis, a generalized biocide against lepidopteran pests, generally is applied to coincide with populations at the peak frequencies of Þrst and second instars, to maximize treatment effects (Martin and Bonneaux 2006). Accurate determination of population age and phenology not only provides a tool for timing spray applications but also for explaining the reasons for treatment failures (McClellan and Logan 1994). Measurements of head capsule width give basic information for the development of morphometric and ecological studies addressing pest management (Chatterjee 1939, Williams and McDonald 1982, Fischbacher 1996). Head capsule width has been used frequently for instar determination in species of Lepidoptera (Daly 1985, Beaver and Sanderson 1989, McClellan and Logan 1994, Hammack et al. 2003). Dyar (1890) proposed the Þrst mathematical classiÞcation criteria to determine the numbers of insect instars. Later, the method was modiÞed (Taylor 1931), because it was demonstrated that it was not applicable to all insect species. Several methods of statistical analysis can be used to group individuals into instar classes when measure1 Corresponding author: Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias. Centro Ciencias Medioambientales, CSIC. C/Serrano 115 dpdo, 28006 Madrid, Spain (e-mail: [email protected]). 2 Crop Protection Area, IFAPA Centro “Las Torres-Tomejil,” Apartado OÞcial, 41200 Alcalá del Rṍo, Sevilla, Spain. ments overlap between instars (Fox et al. 1972, Caltagirone et al. 1983, Beaver and Sanderson 1989, McClellan and Logan 1994). The moth Streblote panda Hübner (1820) has been considered a pest of several ornamental and fruit plants in the Mediterranean area (Balachowsky 1966, Zhang 1994, Molina 1998); however, information about this insect is scarce. There are no published data on either instar numbers, or head capsule width as a function of instar. Brief anatomical descriptions of larval stages are available for this species (Huertas Dionisio 1980, Bogner 1999, Gómez de Aizpúrua 2002, Calvo 2004), but no morphometric studies have been found. S. panda is distributed throughout the southwestern Mediterranean Basin, from the southeastern Iberian Peninsula, through the Sahara and from Morocco to Egypt. The larvae are polyphagous. The length of S. panda larval stages, encompassing ⬎50% of the biological cycle, making instar determination a key for better knowledge of its biology as well as being a valuable tool for pest management. Size and variation of head capsule were examined in S. panda larvae reared on different host plants under laboratory conditions. The study was carried out to determine whether head capsule width measurements provide a reliable estimate of the age of the larvae, and to characterize and develop criteria to determine instar number of this species. We report the frequency distribution of each instar and assign ranges to individual instars based on head capsule width Þtted to normal curves for all raw data. 0013-8746/08/0881Ð0886$04.00/0 䉷 2008 Entomological Society of America 882 ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 101, no. 5 Number of larvae 300 200 100 50 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 Head capsule width (mm) Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of observed head capsule width of S. panda, and Þtted functions to head capsule data for each instar by using NLLS Þtting to Gaussian curves. deviations, and growth ratios, were calculated for each instar and host plant. Our Þrst approach was to determine the possibility of DyarÕs rule use (Dyar 1890) to assign specimens to instars. Linear regression analysis was used to establish relationships between growth ratio (head capsule width [millimeters]) at instar i ⫹1/head capsule width [millimeters] at instar i) and molt number for larvae of each population (Jobin et al. 1992). Head capsule data were graphically represented at 0,05-mm size intervals to use Þtted Gaussian distributions to delineate instars. An initial estimate of the mean and the variance (s2) was computed. These estimates were used as initial values for nonlinear least-square Þtting (NLLS) of normal (Gaussian) curves to each instar as well as for Þnal parameter estimates that accounted for potential overlap between instar distributions (McClellan and Logan 1994, Godin et al. 2002). Once means and variances associated with each instar subpopulation were estimated using NLLS Þtting, determination of overlapping points to classify 1.8 5 instars 6 instars 7 instars 8 instars 1.7 Growth ratio Materials and Methods Larvae used in this study were from an experimental colony maintained in our laboratory (IFAPA. Centro ÔLas Torres-TomejilÕ, Seville, Spain), on strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L., Ericaceae). The colony was established in June 2000, but from time to time wild specimens collected in the Þeld as larvae and reared on their own host plants were used to avoid inbreeding. Larvae were reared from eggs at 25 ⫾ 1⬚C, 70 ⫾ 5% RH, and a photoperiod of 16:8 (L:D) h. From 2001 to 2003, several rearings were done on the following host plants: mastic (Pistacea lentisco L., Anacardiaceae), strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo, Ericaceae), blueberry (Vaccinium spp., Ericaceae), tangerine (Citrus reticulata Blanco, Rutaceae), broom (Retama sphaerocarpa (L.) Boiss, Fabaceae), Spanish broom (Spartium junceum L., Fabaceae), and French tamarisk (Tamarix gallica L., Tamaricaceae). After egg hatch, cohorts of larvae were reared in groups until the third instar. Larvae were individualized when they molted to fourth instar. Boxes were examined daily, and the shed head capsules, if present, were collected and saved in vials with head molt date, host plant and instar number, which corresponded to each rearing. Later the capsules were set on glass slides with gum arabic, ensuring that the facial area of the head stayed parallel to the surface of the slide to make sure that the planes of length and width were perpendicular to the axis vision of the microscope. Measurements were made across the greatest width of the head (genae) in a stereomicroscope with an ocular micrometer. All the head capsules obtained from 387 larvae were included in the analysis. Head capsule widths of last instars were not measured because we allowed complete development in our rearings and the capsules split after the last ecdysis. Data were grouped according to host plant, larval sex, and Þnal number of molts. Means and standard 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1 2 3 4 5 Molt number 6 7 Fig. 2. Growth ratio and molt number relationship for all host plants used in rearings of S. panda. The number of larvae used on each stadium is speciÞed on Table 1. 5.26 ⫾ 0.00 2 5.04 ⫾ 0.19 5.04 ⫾ 0.15 4.47 4.45 ⫾ 0.21 3 3 5 1 6.05 6.29 ⫾ 0.10 5.39 5.02 ⫾ 0.10 5.81 ⫾ 0.10 5.76 ⫾ 1.74 5.17 ⫾ 0.12 5.39 4.12 ⫾ 0.30 11 15 10 9 1 5 1 3 1 5.13 a Means within a column followed with different letters are signiÞcantly different (P ⬍ 0.05; NewmanÐKeuls multiple range test). * P ⬍ 0.05; ** P ⬍ 0.01; and *** P ⬍ 0.001. b Data not included in the analysis. 12 4.49 ⫾ 0.13ab 15 4.26 ⫾ 0.08bc 14 3.92 ⫾ 0.09c 18 4.58 ⫾ 0.09a 10 4.66 ⫾ 0.16a 11 4.05 ⫾ 0.11c 11 4.50 ⫾ 0.05ab 6 3.28 ⫾ 0.15d 7 4.29 ⫾ 0.09abc 14 4.11 ⫾ 0.06bc 14 4.13 ⫾ 0.07bc 2 3.98 ⫾ 0.30 F10,121 ⫽ 12.32*** 23 3.50 ⫾ 0.05a 24 3.23 ⫾ 0.05b 14 2.83 ⫾ 0.06d 22 3.43 ⫾ 0.05a 10 3.65 ⫾ 0.19a 14 3.20 ⫾ 0.04bc 15 3.48 ⫾ 0.03a 6 2.50 ⫾ 0.06e 15 3.46 ⫾ 0.10a 15 3.07 ⫾ 0.03bc 15 3.00 ⫾ 0.05cd 2 2.70 ⫾ 0.41 F10,163 ⫽ 19.25*** 23 2.33 ⫾ 0.03a 24 2.20 ⫾ 0.03b 14 2.07 ⫾ 0.04b 40 2.35 ⫾ 0.02a 10 2.34 ⫾ 0.06a 15 2.34 ⫾ 0.02a 26 2.30 ⫾ 0.02a 6 1.73 ⫾ 0.02c 34 2.18 ⫾ 0.02b 16 2.20 ⫾ 0.02b 30 2.13 ⫾ 0.02b 2 1.84 ⫾ 0.00 F10,225 ⫽ 22.60*** 23 1.56 ⫾ 0.01a 24 1.51 ⫾ 0.01ab 27 1.41 ⫾ 0.02c 40 1.57 ⫾ 0.25a 10 1.58 ⫾ 0.02a 15 1.52 ⫾ 0.00ab 32 1.55 ⫾ 0.01a 6 1.51 ⫾ 0.07ab 34 1.47 ⫾ 0.02b 36 1.50 ⫾ 0.01ab 30 1.48 ⫾ 0.02b 2 1.41 ⫾ 0.03 F10,270 ⫽ 12.47*** 23 1.05 ⫾ 0.00ab 24 1.03 ⫾ 0.01b 27 1.06 ⫾ 0.01a 70 1.04 ⫾ 0.00ab 10 1.05 ⫾ 0.00ab 78 1.06 ⫾ 0.00a 32 1.05 ⫾ 0.00ab 12 1.02 ⫾ 0.01b 34 1.03 ⫾ 0.01b 36 1.02 ⫾ 0.01b 30 1.03 ⫾ 0.01b 11 1.05 ⫾ 0.01 F10,356 ⫽ 7.33*** Width (mm)a Host plant n Width (mm)a n Width (mm)a n Width (mm)a n L4 L3 L2 L1 Head capsule width (mean ⴞ SE, millimeters) per instar in each host plant of lappet moth S. panda Table 1. Head capsule widths ranged from 0.92 to 6.45 mm, for all raw data. Peaks are indicated at ⬇1.05, 1.50, 2.05, 3.40, 4.10, and 6.0 mm. Examination of frequency distributions of raw data showed various overlapping degrees from third instar onward (Fig. 1). Only the distribution of the Þrst instar was discrete; distributions for the rest of instars exhibited different degrees of overlap which increased with instar. Head capsule width of S. panda, in relation to the total number of instars recorded, only followed the DyarÕs rule when showed Þve instars. The increment of instar number produced a decrease of growth ratio, so did not follow the rule (Fig. 2). Larvae of S. panda fed on different host plants showed signiÞcantly differences among instars head capsule width (Table 1). The data formed a series of separate distributions, and they did not show overlapping along the development between instars. Except for larvae eared on R. sphaerocarpa, S. junceum, V. corymbosumÔSharpblueÕ, and V. asheiÔBonitaÕ that showed various overlapping degrees in the last instars, generally from Þfth to seventh (Table 2). Growth ratio was 1.5 from Þrst to third instar, and it decreased as the number of molts increased. When the raw data were separated in relation to sex (Table 3), only larvae with Þve instars showed a constant growth ratio of 1.5. Nonoverlapping distributions were detected for males with Þve or six instars and females with Þve instars. From third instar onward, head capsule widths for females were greater than for males, and for both sexes the growth ratio decreased and showed overlapping distributions when larvae presented seven or eight instars (Table 3). Table 4 show the values of the mean, range of variation, overlap points, and the probabilities of misclassiÞcation for each instar, based on the whole data set after NLLS Þtting of normal curves. As head capsule width increased, so did the probability of misclassiÞcation. MisclassiÞcation probabilities of instar i as instar i ⫺ 1 was always greater than the probability of misclassiÞcation of instar i as instar i ⫹ 1. n Results P. lentiscus A. unedo C. reticulata R. shaerocarpa S. junceum T. gallica V. corymbosum ÔOÕNealÕ V. corymbosum Sharpblue V. corymbosum ÔMistyÕ V. ashei ÔWindyÕ V. ashei Bonita V. asheib ‘Climax’ L5 n where X is a normal variable with the mean and the standard deviation ; Xo is the overlap point, and Z is the standard normal. All calculations and statistics were done using GraphPad Prism version 4 for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). 883 1 n 册 Width (mm) Xo ⫺ L6b 冋 P关X ⬎ Xo兴 ⬵ Z ⬎ L7b individual observations into the appropriate instar was accomplished by graphical determination. MisclassiÞcation probabilities for overlapping curves were then computed using the method of Rodrṍguez-Quiroz et al. (2000). Estimated mean and standard deviation were selected as the values of the parameters and , respectively, using the following equation: Width (mm) CALVO AND MOLINA: INSTAR DETERMINATION OF S. panda Width (mm)a September 2008 884 ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Table 2. Vol. 101, no. 5 Ranges of head capsule widths per instar in each for S. panda larvae reared on different host plants Host plant L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 P. lentiscus A. unedo C. reticulata R. shaerocarpa S. junceum T. gallica V. corymbosum OÕNeal V. corymbosum Sharpblue V. corymbosum Misty V. ashei Windy V. ashei Bonita 0.98Ð1.09 0.92Ð1.09 0.99Ð1.12 0.98Ð1.12 1.05Ð1.05 1.05Ð1.12 0.99Ð1.05 0.99Ð1.05 0.98Ð1.05 0.99Ð1.05 0.99Ð1.05 1.38Ð1.71 1.31Ð1.58 1.32Ð1.58 1.38Ð1.64 1.45Ð1.71 1.51Ð1.58 1.32Ð1.64 1.45Ð1.58 1.31Ð1.58 1.38Ð1.58 1.32Ð1.58 2.04Ð2.63 1.91Ð2.41 1.84Ð2.14 1.84Ð2.63 1.84Ð2.43 2.17Ð2.43 2.11Ð2.41 1.71Ð1.84 1.91Ð2.37 2.11Ð2.43 1.84Ð2.37 3.03Ð3.95 2.89Ð3.81 2.5Ð3.36 2.76Ð3.75 2.37Ð4.67 3.03Ð3.42 3.29Ð3.68 2.3Ð2.63 2.89Ð4.21 2.76Ð3.22 2.7Ð3.29 3.95Ð5.3 3.95Ð5.0 3.42Ð4.51 3.68Ð5.06 3.42Ð5.0 3.42Ð4.47 4.21Ð4.8 2.89Ð3.75 3.95Ð4.74 3.75Ð4.54 3.68Ð4.67 Discussion There are no literature data on S. panda head capsule size or instar numbers with which to compare our results. Calculated growth ratios for Þrst to third instars of S. panda seem to Þt DyarÕs rule, and they were similar to the ones reported for Malacosoma spp. (Fitzgerald 1995, Verdinelli and Sannia-Passino 2003). However, Þfth, sixth, seventh, and eighth instars showed smaller growth ratios than expected. Thus, it was concluded that, as recorded for other lepidopteran species, S. panda development was not in full agreement with DyarÕs rule (Gaines and Campbell 1935, Goettel and Philogéne 1979). This study found variable number of molts for S. panda larvae. A variable number of instars is well recorded in the literature for many insect species, and it largely depends on the nutritive value of the food on which they fed, which is affected by environmental factors (Gaines and Campbell 1935, Fogal and Kwain 1972, Schmidt et al. 1977, Goettel and Philogéne 1979, Jobin et al. 1992, ShaÞei et al. 2001, Esperk et al. 2007). Temperature was held constant in this study; thus, the main source of variation for both head capsule width and instar number is likely to be food type (namely, plant species) and quality. Some nutritional factors, such as leaf toughness related to plant phenology, inßuences larval development of this species Table 3. Males Instar I II III IV V VI VII Females L6 4.74Ð5.79 5.13Ð6.31 4.25Ð6.05 4.67Ð5.78 3.36Ð4.87 L7 6.12Ð6.29 4.21Ð4.87 4.74Ð5.39 4.47Ð5.26 on closely related plant species (Calvo 2004, Calvo and Molina 2004). An increment of instars number mainly due to adverse developmental conditions can be found in other lepidopteran species, such as Malacosoma disstria Hübner (Esperk et al. 2007). Developmental time (measured as number of instars) seems to increase head capsule width overlaps and misclassiÞcation probabilities, and it must be related with the feeding strategies adopted by this species along its life cycle. S. panda closely follows a “capital breeding” reproductive pattern (Tammaru and Haukioja 1996) in which Þnal instar weight is a more important parameter for survivorship and reproduction than the developmental time (Nijhout 1975, Slansky 1993, Santos and Shields 1998). Instar numbers, head capsule width, and larval size are linked to host plant use to reach a minimum pupal weight (Tammaru and Haukioja 1996, Jönnson 1997). S. panda show aggregated larvae in the three Þrst instars. Like in other species, gregarious behavior of S. panda perhaps could be related with the increment of foraging efÞciency of caterpillars by facilitating the establishment of feeding sites, providing thermal beneÞts that improve feeding and assimilation, or improving feeding efÞciency through antipredator defense (Joos et al. 1988, Stamp and Bowers 1988, Hochuli 2001; see reviews by Stamp and Casey 1993, Costa Head capsule width (millimeters) per instar of S. panda in relation to the sex of the larvae reared 5 instars (n ⫽ 36) Mean ⫾ S.E. 1.05 ⫾ 0.01 1.53 ⫾ 0.02 2.35 ⫾ 0.03 3.47 ⫾ 0.03 Mean ⫾ S.E. }1.5 }1.5 }1.5 1.03 ⫾ 0.01 1.50 ⫾ 0.01 2.18 ⫾ 0.02 3.16 ⫾ 0.05 4.20 ⫾ 0.03 5 instars (n ⫽ 17) Instar Mean ⫾ S.E. I II III IV V VI VII 1.04 ⫾ 0.01 1.59 ⫾ 0.06 2.36 ⫾ 0.04 3.57 ⫾ 0.07 6 instars (n ⫽ 34) Growth ratio Mean ⫾ S.E. }1.5 }1.5 }1.5 }1.3 1.05 ⫾ 0.01 1.32 ⫾ 0.05 2.20 ⫾ 0.05 3.12 ⫾ 0.09 4.11 ⫾ 0.10 5.10 ⫾ 0.20 6 instars (n ⫽ 38) Growth ratio Mean ⫾ S.E. }1.5 }1.5 }1.5 1.03 ⫾ 0.01 1.52 ⫾ 0.01 2.25 ⫾ 0.02 3.34 ⫾ 0.04 4.47 ⫾ 0.05 7 instars (n ⫽ 16) Growth ratio Mean ⫾ S.E. Growth ratio }1.3 }1.7 }1.4 }1.3 }1.2 1.05 1.45 1.84 2.37 3.42 4.25 5.39 }1.4 }1.3 }1.3 }1.4 }1.2 }1.3 7 instars (n ⫽ 20) Growth ratio Mean ⫾ S.E. }1.5 }1.5 }1.5 }1.3 1.05 ⫾ 0.01 1.48 ⫾ 0.02 2.24 ⫾ 0.05 3.20 ⫾ 0.11 4.36 ⫾ 0.11 5.47 ⫾ 0.11 8 instars (n ⫽ 1) Growth ratio 8 instars (n ⫽ 6) Growth ratio Mean ⫾ S.E. Growth ratio }1.4 }1.5 }1.4 }1.4 }1.2 1.05 ⫾ 0.00 1.25 ⫾ 0.09 2.18 ⫾ 0.07 3.11 ⫾ 0.09 4.23 ⫾ 0.12 5.08 ⫾ 0.15 5.91 ⫾ 0.21 }1.2 }1.7 }1.4 }1.4 }1.2 }1.2 September 2008 CALVO AND MOLINA: INSTAR DETERMINATION OF S. panda Table 4. Head capsule width means (millimeters), range and probabilities of misclassifying instar of S. panda after NLLS fitting to normal curves Instar (i) n Mean ⫾ SD Range Overlap point (mm) I II III IV V VI VII 387 279 240 175 134 61 10 1.04 ⫾ 0.02 1.56 ⫾ 0.09 2.29 ⫾ 0.19 3.34 ⫾ 0.30 4.27 ⫾ 0.41 5.44 ⫾ 0.77 5.59 ⫾ 1.12 0.95Ð1.14 1.28Ð1.85 1.66Ð2.90 2.43Ð4.25 3.09Ð5.42 3.80Ð6.86 4.42Ð6.73 1.798 2.727 3.783 4.948 6.907 Probability of misclassifying Instar i as i-1 0.0042 0.0217 0.1182 0.2614 0.1196 Instar i as i ⫹1 0.0032 0.0117 0.0712 0.0515 0.0291 2006). Later, from fourth instar onward, the species show solitary larvae. Wider variation ranges in head capsules widths were recorded for these solitary late instars between host plants. Larger larvae also have larger heads and stronger mandibular muscles, which are capable of producing greater force, inßuencing the effectiveness of feeding strategies (Bernays 1986). Variation in head capsule widths and associated molts among host plants would be then related to variability in nutritional quality as season progresses, and connected with the particular phenology of each host plant, and the larvae capabilities to Þnd an optimal feeding site. Given the variability in the number of instars of our data, one would expect a different frequency distribution of head capsule widths among host plants when we change the developmental conditions (i.e., geographically, variability in abiotic conditions between years, soils types, fertilization scenarios, and so on). These results should serve as a caveat to other workers. The use of DyarÕs Rule without taking into account the particular scenario conditions could produce important mistakes in the assignment of larvae to each instar, mainly due to the increased of error probabilities. Acknowledgments Funds for this research were provided by D.G. de Investigación y Formación Agraria, Consejerṍa de Agricultura y Pesca, Junta de Andalucṍa, Projects PIA 1301.02; 03-025, and Instituto Nacional Investigaciones Agrarias, MAPA, Project RTA 03-092. References Cited Balachowsky, A. S. 1966. Entomologie appliquée a lÕAgriculture. Tome II. Lepidoptères. Masson et Cie, Parṍs, France. Beaver, R. J., and J. P. Sanderson. 1989. Classifying instars of the navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) based on observed head capsule widths. J. Econ. Entomol. 82: 716 Ð 720. Bernays, E. A. 1986. Diet-induced allometry among foliagechewing insects and its importance for graminivores. Science (Wash., D.C.) 4737: 495Ð 497. Bogner, A. 1999. Eine Zuchtbeschreibung von Streblote panda (Hübner,1820) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Nachr. Entomol. Ver. Apollo 20: 127Ð132. 885 Calvo, D. 2004. Streblote panda Hübner, [1820] (Lepidoptera, Lasiocampidae) incidencia sobre plantas ornamentales y frutales en Andalucṍa Occidental. Bases ecológicas y sugerencias para su control. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Seville, Seville, Spain. Calvo, D., and J. Ma. Molina. 2004. Utilization of blueberry by the lappet moth Streblote panda Hübner (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae): survival, development and larval performance. J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 957Ð963. Caltagirone, L. E., W. Getz, and D. W. Meals. 1983. Head capsule width as an index of age in larvae of navel orangeworm Amuelosis transitella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Environ. Entomol. 12: 219 Ð221. Chatterjee, P. N. 1939. On the biology and morphology of Apanteles machaeralis Wilkinson (Braconidae: Hymenoptera). Indian For. Rec. Entomol. 5: 357Ð392. Costa, J. T. 2006. The other insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Daly, H. V. 1985. Insect morphometrics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 30: 415Ð 438. Dyar, H. G. 1890. The number of molts of lepidopterous larvae. Psyche 5: 420 Ð 422. Esperk, T., T. Tammaru, and S. Nylin. 2007. IntraespeciÞc variability in number of larval instars in insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 627Ð 645. Fischbacher, M. 1996. Relation between head capsule width and fresh weight in some caterpillar species (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Tortricidae). Entomol. Gen. 20: 299 Ð303. Fitzgerald, T. D. 1995. The tent caterpillars. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. Fogal, W. H., and M. J. Kwain. 1972. Host plant nutritive value and variable number of instars in a sawßy, Diprion similis. Isr. J. Entomol. 7: 63Ð72. Fox, R. C., S. C. Anderson, and I. W. Alton. 1972. Larval head capsules of the Nantucket pine tip moth. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 513Ð514. Gaines, J. C., and F. L. Campbell. 1935. DyarÕs rule as related to the number of instars of the corn ear worm, Heliothis obsoleta (Fab.), collected in the Þeld. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 28: 445Ð 461. Goettel, M. S., and B.J.R. Philogéne. 1979. Further studies on the biology of Pyrrharctia (Isia) isabella (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). III. The relation between head capsule width and number of instars. Can. Entomol. 111: 323Ð326. Godin, J., P. Maltais, and S. Gaudet. 2002. Head capsule width as an instar indicator for larvae of the cranberry fruitworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in southeastern New Brunswick. J. Econ. Entomol. 95: 1308 Ð1313. Gómez de Aizpúrua, C. 2002. Orugas y mariposas de Europa. Orden Lepidoptera. Heterocera, vol. 4. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, Spain. Hammack, L., M. M. Ellsbury, R. L. Roehrdanz, and J. L. Pikul. 2003. Larval sampling and instar determination in Þeld populations of northern and western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 1153Ð1159. Hochuli, D. F. 2001. Insect herbivory and ontogeny: how do growth and development inßuence feeding behaviour, morphology and host use?. Austral. Ecol. 26: 563Ð570. Huertas Dionisio, M. 1980. Streblote panda (Hübner, 1820) en Huelva (Lep. Lasiocampidae). SHILAP Rvta. Lepid. 30: 113Ð116, 146. Jobin, L., C. Hébert, and J. P. Bourassa. 1992. Head capsule width of larval populations of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in Quebec, with reference to DyarÕs hypothesis. Environ. Entomol. 21: 89 Ð93. 886 ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Jönnson, K. I. 1997. Capital and income breeders as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos 78: 57Ð 66. Joos, B., T. M. Casey, T. D. Fitzgerald, and W. A. Buttemer. 1988. Roles of the tent in behavioral thermoregulation of eastern tent caterpillars. Ecology 69: 2004 Ð2011. Martin, J. C., and X. Bonneaux. 2006. Bacillus thuringiensis, 30 years of control of cluster caterpillars. Phytoma 590: 4 Ð7. McClellan, Q. C., and J. A. Logan. 1994. Instar determination for the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera. Lymantriidae) based on the frequency distribution of head capsule widths. Environ. Entomol. 23: 248 Ð253. Molina, J. Ma. 1998. Lepidópteros asociados al cultivo del arándano en Andalucṍa Occidental. Bol. San. Veg. Plagas 24: 763Ð772. Nijhout, H. F. 1975. A threshold size for metamorphosis in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta (L.). Biol. Bull 149: 214 Ð225. Rodrı́guez-Quiroz, M., J. Valdez-Carrasco, J. Vera-Graziano, and A. Castillo-Morales. 2000. IdentiÞcación de ṍnstares larvales de Zabrotes subfasciatus (Boh.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) mediante las dimensiones de sus cápsulas cefálicas. Agrociencia 34: 83Ð90. Santos, L., and E. J. Shields. 1998. Temperature and diet effect on black cutworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larval development. J. Econ. Entomol. 91: 267Ð273. Schmidt, F. H., R. K. Campbell, and S. J. Trotter, Jr. 1977. Errors in determining instar through head capsule measurements of a lepidopteranÐa laboratory study and critique. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 70: 750 Ð756. Shafiei, M., A. P. Moczek, and H. F. Nijhout. 2001. Food availability controls the onset of metamorphosis in the Vol. 101, no. 5 dung beetle Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae). Physiol. Entomol. 26: 173Ð180. Slansky, F., Jr. 1993. Nutritional ecology: the fundamental quest for nutrients, pp. 29 Ð91. In N. E. Stamp and T. M. Casey [eds.], Caterpillars. Ecological and evolutionary constraints to foraging. Chapman & Hall, New York. Stamp, N. E., and M. D. Bowers. 1988. Direct and indirect effects of predatory wasps (Polistes sp.: Vespidae) on gregarious caterpillars (Hemileuca lucina: Saturniidae). Oecologia (Berl.) 75: 619 Ð 624. Stamp, N. E., and T. M. Casey. 1993. Caterpillars: ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging. Chapman & Hall, New York. Tammaru, T., and E. Haukioja. 1996. Capital breeders and income breeders among LepidopteraÐ consequences to population dynamics. Oikos 77: 561Ð564. Taylor, R. L. 1931. On “DyarÕs rule” and its application to sawßy larvae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 24: 451Ð 466. Verdinelli, M., and G. Sannia-Passino. 2003. Development and feeding efÞciency of Malacosoma neustrium larvae reared with Quercus spp. leaves. Ann. Appl. Biol. 143: 161Ð167. Williams, D. G., and G. McDonald. 1982. The duration and number of the immature stage of codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Tortricidae: Lepidoptera). J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 21: 1Ð 4. Zhang, B. Ch. 1994. Index of economically important Lepidoptera. CAB International. Wallingford, United Kingdom. Received 12 April 2007; accepted 20 March 2008.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz