2016 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD SECOND SESSION OF THE 114TH CONGRESS LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS scorecard.lcv.org LCV BOARD OF DIRECTORS * JOHN H. ADAMS JOHN HUNTING, HONORARY LARRY ROCKEFELLER Natural Resources Defense Council John Hunting & Associates American Conservation Association BRENT BLACKWELDER, HONORARY MICHAEL KIESCHNICK Friends of the Earth NextGen Climate THEODORE ROOSEVELT IV, HONORARY CHAIR THE HONORABLE SHERWOOD L. BOEHLERT MARK MAGAÑA Barclays Capital GreenLatinos KERRY SCHUMANN The Accord Group THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNER, CHAIR Center for American Progress BRENDON CECHOVIC Western Conservation Foundation CARRIE CLARK North Carolina League of Conservation Voters WADE GREENE, HONORARY Rockefeller Family & Associates PETE MAYSMITH Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters Conservation Colorado LAURA TURNER SEYDEL WINSOME MCINTOSH, HONORARY Turner Foundation The McIntosh Foundation TRIP VAN NOPPEN WILLIAM H. MEADOWS III Earthjustice The Wilderness Society KATHLEEN WELCH REUBEN MUNGER Corridor Partners Vision Ridge Partners, LLC ANTHA WILLIAMS WILLIAM (BILL) J. ROBERTS Bloomberg Philanthropies Corridor Partners REVEREND LENNOX YEARWOOD RAMPA R. HORMEL Enlyst Fund Hip Hop Caucus LCV ISSUES & ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE * BRENT BLACKWELDER RUTH HENNIG KERRY SCHUMANN Friends of the Earth The John Merck Fund Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNER MARK MAGAÑA TRIP VAN NOPPEN Center for American Progress GreenLatinos Earthjustice DAVID GOLDSTON REUBEN MUNGER Natural Resources Defense Council Vision Ridge Partners, LLC LCV SCORECARD ADVISORY COMMITTEE * ANNA AURILIO MARTY HAYDEN ALAN ROWSOME Environment America Earthjustice The Wilderness Society JOE BONFIGLIO ALLISON HAYS JOSHUA SAKS Environmental Defense Fund The Humane Society of the United States National Wildlife Federation KRISTEN BRENGEL CRAIG LASHER BEN SCHREIBER National Parks Conservation Association Population Action International Friends of the Earth ROBERT COWIN ERIK SCHNEIDER CINDY SHOGAN Union of Concerned Scientists National Audubon Society Alaska Wilderness League ROBERT DEWEY MELINDA PIERCE SCOTT SLESINGER Defenders of Wildlife Sierra Club Natural Resources Defense Council * Organizations are shown for identification purposes only T CO N T E N T S 1. ANALYSIS he nonprofit League of Conservation Voters (LCV) has published a National Environmental Scorecard every Congress since 1970, the year it was founded by leaders of the environmental movement following the first Earth Day. LCV works to turn environmental values into national, state and local Overview of the 2nd Session of the 114th Congress 3 Voting Summary 6 priorities. This edition of the National Environmental Scorecard provides objective, factual information about the most important environmental legislation considered and the corresponding voting records of all members of the second session of the 114th Congress. This Scorecard represents the consensus of experts from about 20 respected environmental and con- 2. SENATE SCORES servation organizations who selected the key votes on which members of Vote Descriptions 10 Senate Votes 14 Congress should be scored. LCV scores votes on the most important issues of the year, including energy, climate change, public health, public lands and wildlife conservation, and spending for environmental programs. The votes included in this Scorecard presented members of Congress with a real choice and help distinguish which legislators are working for environ- 3. HOUSE SCORES Vote Descriptions mental protection. Except in rare circumstances, the Scorecard excludes 19 consensus action on the environment and issues on which no recorded votes occurred. House Votes 30 Dedicated environmentalists and national leaders volunteered their time to identify and research crucial votes. We extend special thanks to Cover images: Official White House Photo; Architect of the Capitol; flickr/usinterior (altered); Matt Roth; LCV Photo our Board of Directors, Issues & Accountability Committee, and Scorecard Advisory Committee for their valuable input. IMAGE FROM FLICKR/PORTLANDGENERALELECTRIC. AGE FROM FLICKR/KATAHDINWOODSANDWATERS. 2005 OVERVIEW 2016 OVERVIEW There is no doubt that 2016 will be remembered as a defining year in the fight to address climate 1. ANALYSIS change. Even as we experienced the hottest year on record—for the third year in a row—and world leaders came together on Earth Day to sign the historic climate agreement reached in Paris in December 2015, the extreme anti-environmental leadership in the U.S. House and Senate once again unleashed a breathtaking array of assaults on the environment and public health. The 2016 Scorecard includes a record-breaking 38 votes provided long-overdue funding to address the water and in the U.S. House of Representatives, topping the previous public health crisis for the families of Flint, Michigan, but it high of 35 votes in the 2014 and 2015 National Environ- also undermined endangered species protections in Califor- mental Scorecards, and reflecting that it remains the most nia. Finally, it’s also worth noting that while much time was anti-environmental U.S. House in history. As in recent spent in both the Senate and the House on comprehensive years, these votes and those taken in the Senate left virtu- energy legislation, efforts to conference the Senate Energy ally no issue unscathed and included attacks on many of Committee Chair Lisa Murkowski’s (R-AK) and Ranking our cornerstone environmental laws, including the Clean Member Maria Cantwell’s (D-WA) compromise bill with Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the National Environ- the House’s extreme pro-fossil fuel energy version, fell apart. mental Policy Act (NEPA), the Endangered Species Act, and the Antiquities Act. From working to block access In a bit of positive news, 22 Republicans (14 in the House to the courts to attacking individual species to trying to and eight in the Senate) scored over 25 percent this year, undermine clean energy advancements, the Republican- including three who scored 50 percent or higher, a signifi- led Congress pulled out all the stops to push a polluter- cant increase from the past few Scorecards. By compari- friendly agenda. son, only six scored over 25 percent in 2015 and only four in 2014. Of course, we very much hope to see more Re- While not included in the Scorecard, a couple of major publicans continue to step up to protect our environmental bills relating to public health and environmental protec- safeguards in 2017. In additional good news, the number tions were signed into law in 2016. The Frank R. Lauten- of true environmental champions in Congress continues berg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act reformed to grow and become more vocal and effective than ever the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and is the first before. In April, over 200 current and former members of major update to an environmental statute in 20 years. It Congress, spanning 38 states, filed an amicus brief with provides the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) more the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the EPA’s landmark authority to regulate toxic chemicals, but it also rolled back Clean Power Plan. In July, 20 U.S. Senators led by Sena- state authority to go above and beyond the federal govern- tor Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and more than 15 U.S. ment’s efforts to restrict the uses of chemicals. The Water Representatives led by Representative Ted Lieu (D-CA-33) Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act expressed their disapproval of industrial climate denial 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 3 activities and exposed the polluter-funded “Web of De- and the Gold Butte National Monument in Nevada. In nial” in floor speeches and resolutions. In August, dozens what should be the norm going forward, the president con- of members of Congress marked the centennial of the Na- tinued to protect places that are culturally and historically tional Park Service and joined LCV and the public to call significant and that reflect the story of all Americans, such for the protection of more special places. as the Belmont-Paul Women’s Equality National Monument honoring the struggle for women’s suffrage, and the 4 The best news of all from 2016 was that President Obama Stonewall National Monument honoring the start of the made an incredible amount of progress in his final year, LGBT rights movement. Following sustained protests by firmly cementing his legacy as the greenest president in the Standing Rock Sioux, the Army Corps of Engineers our history. From the moratorium on new coal leasing on denied the permit for the Dakota Access Pipeline, which public lands to the first-ever limits on methane pollution would have threatened the tribe’s water supply and sacred from the oil and gas industry to guidance for NEPA to lands. Finally, President Obama removed both the Atlan- incorporate climate change to the final heavy-duty truck tic and Arctic Oceans from the five-year offshore drilling fuel efficiency standards to the agreement with nearly 200 plan and enacted an indefinite ban on drilling in virtually countries to reduce super pollutant hydrofluorocarbons the entire Arctic Ocean and important parts of the Atlantic (HFCs) under the Montreal Protocol, it was a banner year Ocean, preserving these precious and fragile ecosystems for in the fight against climate change. generations to come. President Obama also protected additional important pub- As we begin 2017, the stakes for protecting the environ- lic lands and waters in 2016, including designating three na- ment and public health have never been higher and the tional monuments in the California desert, and the Katahdin threats have never been greater. We must do more than Woods and Waters National Monument in Maine, as well ever to work with our allies in Congress—and mobilize as expanding the Papahānauamokuākea Marine National the public—to fight the Trump administration and the Monument, now among the largest marine protected areas extreme Congressional leadership who want to roll back in the entire world. He also created the first-ever marine our bedrock environmental laws and President Obama’s national monument in the Atlantic Ocean—the Northeast incredible progress. LCV pledges to be there every step of Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument— the way, working to combat the climate crisis and fighting and designated the Bears Ears National Monument in Utah to protect our air, water, lands, and wildlife. scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 1. ANALYSIS 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 5 IMAGE FROM OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE PHOTO VOTING SUMMARY 2 0 1 6 S TAT E AV E R AG E S STATE SENATEHOUSE Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming 6 013 273 940 33 8871 6543 10099 9492 5341 924 100100 127 6857 3824 327 02 1217 1219 8559 9785 10098 10039 10050 1824 5325 505 324 6227 74 54 100 60 100 67 100 72 21 24 33 3 6826 91 10075 5036 100 100 15 16 3 0 2121 326 91 5397 9428 10061 36 1 5341 120 S E N AT E HOUSE scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2 0 1 6 S E N AT E H I G H A N D LOW S CO R E S Lowest Senate Delegations: Connecticut 100% · Hawaii 100% · Massachusetts 100% · Michigan 100% · Minnesota 100% · New Jersey 100% · New Mexico 100% · New York 100% · Oregon 100% · Rhode Island 100% · Washington 100% Alabama 0% · Kansas 0% · Arkansas 2% · Iowa 3% · Nebraska 3% · South Dakota 3% · Texas 3% Senate Scores of 100: Senate Scores of 0: Bennet · CONNECTICUT Blumenthal · Murphy · FLORIDA Nelson · HAWAII Hirono · Schatz · ILLINOIS Durbin · MARYLAND Cardin · MASSACHUSETTS Markey · Warren · MICHIGAN Peters · Stabenow · MINNESOTA Franken · Klobuchar · NEVADA Reid · NEW HAMPSHIRE Shaheen · NEW JERSEY Booker · Menendez · NEW MEXICO Heinrich · Udall · NEW YORK Gillibrand · Schumer · OHIO Brown · OREGON Merkley · Wyden · PENNSYLVANIA Casey · RHODE ISLAND Reed · Whitehouse · VERMONT Leahy · VIRGINIA Kaine · WASHINGTON Cantwell · Murray · WISCONSIN Baldwin Sessions · Shelby · ARKANSAS Cotton · GEORGIA Perdue · Coats · IOWA Ernst · KANSAS Moran · Roberts · NEBRASKA Sasse · PENNSYLVANIA Toomey · SOUTH CAROLINA Scott · SOUTH DAKOTA Thune · TENNESSEE Corker · TEXAS Cruz COLORADO 1. ANALYSIS Highest Senate Delegations: ALABAMA INDIANA 2 0 1 6 H O U S E H I G H A N D LOW S CO R E S Highest House Delegations: Lowest House Delegations: Hawaii 100% · Rhode Island 100% · Connecticut 99% · Massachusetts 98% · Vermont 97% · Delaware 92% · Maryland 85% South Dakota 0% · Wyoming 0% · Oklahoma 1% · Utah 1% · West Virginia 1% · Kansas 2% · Alaska 3% · Arkansas 3% · North Dakota 3% House Scores of 100: House Scores of 0: Huffman · Thompson, M. · McNerney · DeSaulnier · Pelosi · Lee, B. · Speier · Honda · Lofgren · Brownley · Schiff · Sherman · Aguilar · Torres · Ruiz · Roybal-Allard · Takano · Lowenthal · Vargas · Davis, S. · COLORADO DeGette · Polis · CONNECTICUT Larson · Courtney · Esty · FLORIDA Grayson · Castor · Deutch · Frankel · Wasserman Schultz · GEORGIA Johnson, H. · HAWAII Hanabusa · Gabbard · ILLINOIS Quigley · Foster · INDIANA Visclosky · MARYLAND Sarbanes · Delaney · Cummings · Van Hollen · MASSACHUSETTS Tsongas · Clark, K. · Moulton · Capuano · Lynch · MICHIGAN Kildee · Levin · Lawrence · MINNESOTA McCollum · MISSOURI Clay · NEW JERSEY Norcross · Pallone · Watson Coleman · NEW MEXICO Lujan Grisham · Luján · NEW YORK Israel · Meng · Velázquez · Clarke · Rangel · Lowey · Slaughter · Higgins · NORTH CAROLINA Price, D. · Adams · OHIO Beatty · Kaptur · Fudge · Ryan, T. · OREGON Bonamici · PENNSYLVANIA Evans · Boyle · Doyle · Cartwright · RHODE ISLAND Cicilline · Langevin · TENNESSEE Cohen · TEXAS Doggett · VIRGINIA Scott, R. · Beyer · Connolly · WASHINGTON Larsen · WISCONSIN Pocan ALABAMA Byrne · Palmer · ARKANSAS Westerman · ARIZONA Gosar · Salmon · Schweikert · CALIFORNIA McClintock · Knight · Rohrabacher · Hunter · COLORADO Tipton · Buck · Lamborn · FLORIDA Mica · Webster · GEORGIA Carter, E.L. · Price, T. · Scott, A. · Collins, D · Hice · Loudermilk · Allen · Graves, T. · IDAHO Labrador · ILLINOIS Hultgren · LaHood · INDIANA Stutzman · Rokita · KANSAS Huelskamp · Yoder · KENTUCKY Comer · Guthrie · Barr · MARYLAND Harris · MINNESOTA Emmer · MISSISSIPPI Kelly, T. · Harper · Palazzo · MISSOURI Luetkemeyer · Hartzler · Graves, S. · Long · Smith, J. · NEBRASKA Smith, Adrian · NEW MEXICO Pearce · NEW YORK Collins · NORTH CAROLINA Ellmers · Foxx · Walker · Rouzer · Hudson · Pittenger · Meadows · Holding · OHIO Chabot · Wenstrup · Jordan · Latta · Johnson, B. · Gibbs, B. · Davidson · Tiberi · Renacci · OKLAHOMA Bridenstine · Mullin · Lucas · Russell · PENNSYLVANIA Kelly · Perry · Rothfus · Pitts · SOUTH CAROLINA Wilson, J. · Duncan, Jeff · Gowdy · Mulvaney · Rice, T. · SOUTH DAKOTA Noem · TENNESSEE Roe · Duncan, John · DesJarlais · Black · Blackburn · Fincher · TEXAS Gohmert · Poe · Johnson, S. · Ratcliffe · Hensarling · Barton · Brady, K. · Conaway · Thornberry · Weber · Flores · Neugebauer · Smith, L. · Olson · Marchant · Williams · Burgess · Farenthold · Carter, J. · Sessions, P. · Babin · UTAH Bishop, R. · Stewart · Chaffetz · VIRGINIA Wittman · Forbes · Goodlatte · Brat · Griffith · WASHINGTON Newhouse · McMorris Rodgers · WEST VIRGINIA McKinley · Mooney · WISCONSIN Sensenbrenner · Grothman · Ribble · WYOMING Lummis CALIFORNIA 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 7 R AT I N G T H E L E A D E R S H I P O F E N V I R O N M E N TA L CO M M I T T E E S SENATE COMMITTEE CHAIR SCORE RANKING MEMBER SCORE Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Roberts (KS) 0 Stabenow (MI) 100 Appropriations Cochran (MS) 24 Mikulski (MD) 94 Commerce, Science and Transportation Thune (SD) 0 Nelson (FL) 100 Energy and Natural Resources Murkowski (AK) 29 Cantwell (WA) 100 Environment and Public Works Inhofe (OK) 12 Boxer (CA) 82 SENATE COMMITTEE LEADER AVERAGE CHAIRS 13 RANKING MEMBERS 95 COMMITTEE CHAIR SCORE RANKING MEMBER SCORE Agriculture Conaway (TX-11) 0 Peterson (MN-07) Appropriations Rogers, Harold (KY-05) 5 Lowey (NY-17) 100 Energy and Commerce Upton (MI-06) 13 Pallone (NJ-06) 100 Natural Resources Bishop, Rob (UT-01) 0 Grijalva (AZ-03) 95 Science, Space, and Technology Smith, Lamar (TX-21) 0 Johnson, Eddie Bernice (TX-30) 95 Transportation and Infrastructure Shuster (PA-09) 3 DeFazio (OR-04) 95 HOUSE COMMITTEE LEADER AVERAGE CHAIRS 4 RANKING MEMBERS 84 HOUSE 18 PA R T Y L E A D E R S ’ S CO R E S SENATE DEMOCRATS SCORE REPUBLICANS SCORE Reid (NV), Minority Leader 100 McConnell (KY), Majority Leader Durbin (IL), Minority Whip 100 Cornyn (TX), Majority Whip 6 Schumer (NY), Conference Vice Chair 100 Thune (SD), Conference Chair 0 Murray (WA), Conference Secretary 100 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 100 12 Barrasso (WY), Policy Committee Chair 12 Blunt (MO), Conference Vice Chair 24 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 11 HOUSE DEMOCRATS SCORE REPUBLICANS Ryan (WI-01), Speaker of the House* Pelosi (CA-12), Minority Leader 10 0 Hoyer (MD-05), Minority Whip 92 SCORE N/A McCarthy (CA-23), Majority Leader 3 Scalise (LA-01), Majority Whip 3 Clyburn (SC-06), Assistant Minority Leader 92 McMorris Rodgers (WA-05), Conference Chairman 0 Becerra (CA-34), Caucus Chairman 89 Messer (IN-06), Policy Committee Chairman 3 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 93 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 2 * The Speaker of the House votes at his discretion. 8 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 9 IMAGE FROM FLICKR/MYPUBLICLANDS 2016 SENATE VOTE DESCRIPTIONS 1. EXTREME ATTACK ON CLEAN WATER PROTECTIONS (CRA) Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) sponsored S.J. Res. 22, a Congressional Review Act “Resolution of Disapproval,” which would void the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Clean Water Rule that protects the small streams and wetlands that feed into the drinking water of 117 million people in this country. Not only would this radical legislative tool vacate the current rule, it would also prohibit the agencies from developing any “substantially similar” rule in the future, keeping the unworkable status quo in place. This could prevent the agencies from ever issuing rules that establish Clean Water Act protections for the waters covered by the Clean Water Rule, leaving our streams, wetlands, lakes, and rivers vulnerable to pollution for generations to come. On January 19, President Obama vetoed S.J. Res. 22. On January 21, the Senate rejected the motion to end debate and proceed to the S.J. Res. 22 veto override by a vote of 52-40 (60 votes were needed to invoke cloture; Senate roll call vote 5). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 2. CLEAN ENERGY FUNDING Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) offered an amendment to S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which would increase funding for the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, an important Department of Energy research program intended to spur transformational breakthroughs in energy technologies. Additional funding for this program could help the United States lead in the clean energy transformation. On January 28, the Senate approved the Schatz amendment by a vote of 55-37 (Senate roll call vote 9). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. S. 2012 passed the Senate and moved to conference with a House-passed energy bill, but did not become law. 3. NATIONAL MONUMENTS Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) offered an amendment to S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which would gut the Antiquities Act, the law first used to protect half of our national parks. The Antiquities Act has been used by 16 presidents of both parties to protect many of America’s most special places, from the Statue of Liberty to the Grand Canyon to the Pacific Remote Islands in Hawaii. On February 2, the Senate rejected the Lee amendment by a vote of 47-48 (Senate roll call vote 10). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 4. ENERGY EFFICIENCY Senator Al Franken (D-MN) offered an amendment to S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which would establish a national energy efficiency resource standard based on successful programs in Minnesota that require electricity and natural gas providers to meet annual targets for cutting energy use in homes and businesses. Energy efficiency saves consumers money while reducing the public health and environmental risks of pollution. This amendment would also send a clear market signal that would spur research and development of energy efficient technologies. On February 2, the Senate rejected the Franken amendment by a vote of 43-52 (Senate roll call vote 11). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 10 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 5. FAST TRACKING NATURAL GAS PIPELINES Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) offered an amendment to S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which would set strict, arbitrary deadlines for the review of natural gas pipelines on federal and tribal lands. This amendment undermines the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by promoting accelerated construction of pipelines and other components of natural gas production at the cost of the environmental reviews that NEPA established to identify serious safety and environmental risks. On February 2, the Senate rejected the Barrasso amendment by a vote of 52-43 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 12). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 6. LIMITING PUBLIC SAFEGUARDS Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK) offered an amendment to S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which would require federal agencies to eliminate a public protection with equal or greater compliance costs before adopting a new one. The Sullivan amendment adopts an extreme and unwise “cut-go” approach to rulemaking, drastically limiting the government’s ability to quickly respond to emerging public health threats and catastrophes like the drinking water crisis that unfolded in Flint, Michigan. On February 2, the Senate rejected the Sullivan amendment by a vote of 49-46 (Senate roll call vote 13). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 7. TAXPAYER HANDOUTS FOR FOSSIL FUEL COMPANIES Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) offered an amendment to S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which would phase out fossil fuel subsidies for coal and some of the largest producers of oil and gas over a four-year period, the same time period over which Congress recently decided to phase out tax credits for solar and wind. The fossil fuel subsidies phased out by this amendment represent billions of dollars of taxpayer handouts for a mature and highly-polluting industry. On February 2, the Senate rejected the Schatz amendment by a vote of 45-50 (Senate roll call vote 14). YES IS THE PROENVIRONMENT VOTE. 8. GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD LABELING Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS) introduced S. 2609, a bill to amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, also known as the Denying Americans the Right to Know (DARK) Act, which would prevent states from requiring the labeling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In addition, the bill would make it harder for companies to inform customers about their ingredients, strip the Food and Drug Administration of its jurisdiction over GMO food disclosures, and force the Department of Agriculture to spend resources promoting biotechnology to consumers. The majority of people in the United States increasingly want to know more about where their food comes from, not less. But instead, this bill’s sweeping preemption of state and local authority is an attack on consumer choice and state efforts to protect human health and the environment. Senator Roberts’ bill was added to S. 764, but on March 16, the Senate rejected the DARK Act by a vote of 48-49 (Senate roll call vote 37). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. S. 764 was later amended and passed by both chambers and signed into law by President Obama on July 29. 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 11 9. ENCOURAGING ENERGY-EFFICIENT HOMES Senator Johnny Isakson (R-GA) offered an amendment to S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which would reform the mortgage market to incentivize energy efficiency by ensuring that energy costs are included in the underwriting process. More efficient homes save money for homeowners while reducing carbon pollution. On April 19, the Senate approved the Isakson amendment by a vote of 66-31 (Senate roll call vote 49). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. S. 2012 passed the Senate and moved to conference with a House-passed energy bill, but did not become law. 10. LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND (LWCF) Senator James Lankford (R-OK) offered an amendment to S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which would divert money away from the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) in order to address maintenance projects in our national parks. This amendment would restrict spending from LWCF’s statutorily-directed purpose in order to address the National Park Service’s deferred maintenance backlog. On April 19, the Senate rejected the Lankford amendment by a vote of 34-63 (Senate roll call vote 50). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 11. WIND ENERGY TRANSMISSION LINE Senator John Boozman (R-AR) offered an amendment to S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which would require additional studies before proceeding with the construction of a 700mile electricity transmission project that would bring wind energy from the Great Plains to the southeast. The project, known as the Plains and Eastern Clean Line project, would provide much-needed transmission capacity to our outdated grid and has already been approved under a process created by the Energy Policy Act of 2005. On April 19, the Senate rejected the Boozman amendment by a vote of 42-55 (Senate roll call vote 51). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 12. VICTORY BONDS FOR CLEAN ENERGY Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) offered an amendment to S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which would require the secretary of the Treasury to develop a plan to issue Clean Energy Victory Bonds. These bonds would aim to raise as much as $50 billion and would be used to finance clean energy projects, including wind, solar, advanced vehicles, and fuel cells. Rapid deployment of clean energy technology is the best way to fight climate change. On April 19, the Senate rejected the Udall amendment by a vote of 50-47 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 52). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 13. ATTACK ON THE CLEAN WATER RULE Senator John Hoeven (R-ND) offered an amendment to H.R. 2028, the Further Continuing and Security Assistance Appropriations Act, 2017, which would prohibit the use of funds for implementation of the Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers’ Clean Water Rule, which protects the small streams and wetlands that feed into the drinking water of 117 million people in the United States. On April 21, the Senate rejected the Hoeven amendment by a vote of 56-42 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 57). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 12 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 14. ATTACK ON ADVANCED VEHICLES Senator Dan Coats (R-IN) offered an amendment to H.R. 2028, the Further Continuing and Security Assistance Appropriations Act, 2017, which would ban the use of funds for the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing loan program. The loan program has successfully promoted innovation in the market for low carbon vehicles, supporting early efforts by companies like Tesla Motors. On April 21, the Senate rejected the Coats amendment by a vote of 48-49 (Senate roll call vote 58). NO IS THE PROENVIRONMENT VOTE. 15. WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) offered an amendment to H.R. 2028, the Further Continuing and Security Assistance Appropriations Act, 2017, which would create a pilot program for water conservation in the Colorado River system. With climate change fueling droughts across the western United States, a new approach to water use in the Colorado basin is badly needed. On April 26, the Senate approved the Reid amendment by a vote of 73-23 (Senate roll call vote 62). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. H.R. 2028 was signed into law by President Obama on December 10. 16. MITIGATING IMPACTS ON FISH & WILDLIFE Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD) offered an amendment to H.R. 2028, the Further Continuing and Security Assistance Appropriations Act, 2017, which would require the Secretary of the Army to use federal and state expertise to mitigate the fish and wildlife impacts of the Army Corps of Engineers’ projects. This amendment clarifies requirements in the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958 to ensure that federal agencies give full consideration to wildlife impact analyses from the Fish and Wildlife Service and state agencies. On May 11, the Senate rejected the Cardin amendment by a vote of 39-60 (Senate roll call vote 69). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 17. REVENUE SHARING FOR OFFSHORE DRILLING Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) sponsored S. 3110, the American Energy and Conservation Act of 2016, which would expand revenue sharing from offshore drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf, which creates incentives for additional offshore drilling that damages our climate and coastal communities, businesses, and ecosystems. Offshore drilling inevitably leads to oil spills, which puts at risk coastal communities’ robust tourism and commercial and recreational fishing industries, as well as critically important wildlife, while impeding America’s transition to clean energy. Revenue sharing also siphons revenues away from the Treasury and directs them to a handful of states at a time when we are struggling to address our nation’s fiscal challenges. On November 17, the Senate rejected a motion to end debate and proceed to S. 3110 by a vote of 51-47 (60 votes were needed to end debate; Senate roll call vote 153). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 13 KEY LCV SCORES 2016 114th Con gress Lifetime Clean Energy Funding National Mon uments Energy Effi ciency Fast Tracking Natural Gas Pipelines Limiting Pu blic Safegu ards Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i= Ineligible to vote s =Absence (counts as negative) Extreme Att ac Protections k on Clean Water (CRA) = a Taxpayer Han douts for Fo ssil Fuel Com panies Genetically Modified Fo od Labeling Encouragin g Energy-E fficient Hom es Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Wind Energy Transmission Line Victory Bond s for Clean Energy Attack on th e Clean Wat er Rule Attack on A dvanced Ve hicles Water Cons ervation Prog ram Mitigating Im pacts on Fish & Wildlife Revenue Sh aring for Off shore Drillin g S E N AT E VOT E S % % % b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1% 1^ 1& ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ALABAMA Sessions, J. R 0 2 6 Shelby R 0 2 14 Murkowski R 29 14 19 Sullivan R 24 10 10 Flake R 6 2 9 McCain R 12 7 20 Boozman R 6 2 7 Cotton R 0 0 3 Boxer D 82 93 91 Feinstein D 94 90 89 Bennet D 100 90 89 Gardner R 29 21 11 Blumenthal D 100 100 96 Murphy, C. D 100 100 96 Carper D 94 88 82 Coons D 94 93 93 Nelson D 100 90 70 Rubio* R 6 2 6 Isakson R 18 7 10 Perdue R 0 0 0 ✘ ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS ✘ CALIFORNIA a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a COLORADO a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ CONNECTICUT a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a DELAWARE a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a FLORIDA a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ GEORGIA ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ * Senator Rubio missed a number of votes while campaigning for U.S. president. 14 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV National Mon uments Energy Effi ciency Fast Tracking Limiting Pu blic Safegu ards Taxpayer Han douts for Fo ssil Fuel Com panies Genetically Modified Fo od Labeling Encouragin g Energy-E fficient Hom es Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Wind Energy Transmission Line Victory Bond s for Clean Energy Attack on th e Clean Wat er Rule Attack on A dvanced Ve hicles Water Cons ervation Prog ram Mitigating Im pacts on Fish & Wildlife Revenue Sh aring for Off shore Drillin g KEY Clean Energy Funding SENATE VOTES c d e f g h LCV SCORES 2016 114th Con gress Lifetime % % % b Natural Gas Pipelines Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i= Ineligible to vote s =Absence (counts as negative) Extreme Att ac Protections k on Clean Water (CRA) = a i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1% 1^ 1& Hirono D 100 100 94 Schatz D 100 98 95 Crapo R 12 5 7 Risch R 12 5 9 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a IDAHO ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ILLINOIS Durbin D Kirk R 35 38 55 Coats R 0 0 22 Donnelly D 76 71 58 Ernst R 0 0 0 Grassley R 6 5 19 Moran R 0 0 8 Roberts R 0 0 9 McConnell R 12 5 7 Paul R 12 10 9 Cassidy R 18 7 8 Vitter R 6 2 4 Collins R 76 67 65 King, A. I 94 98 95 Cardin D 100 98 92 Mikulski D 94 95 85 100 100 87 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ INDIANA ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ IOWA ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a KANSAS KENTUCKY LOUISIANA ✘ MAINE MARYLAND a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 15 2. SENATE SCORES HAWAII KEY LCV SCORES b Natural Gas Pipelines Limiting Pu blic Safegu ards % Fast Tracking Lifetime % Energy Effi ciency 114th Con gress % National Mon uments 2016 Clean Energy Funding Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i= Ineligible to vote s =Absence (counts as negative) Extreme Att ac Protections k on Clean Water (CRA) = a c d e f g Taxpayer Han douts for Fo ssil Fuel Com panies Genetically Modified Fo od Labeling Encouragin g Energy-E fficient Hom es Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Wind Energy Transmission Line Victory Bond s for Clean Energy Attack on th e Clean Wat er Rule Attack on A dvanced Ve hicles Water Cons ervation Prog ram Mitigating Im pacts on Fish & Wildlife Revenue Sh aring for Off shore Drillin g S E N AT E VOT E S h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1% 1^ 1& MASSACHUSETTS Markey D 100 100 94 Warren D 100 100 98 Peters, G. D 100 100 92 Stabenow D 100 100 88 Franken D 100 100 96 Klobuchar D 100 100 95 Cochran R 24 10 10 Wicker R 12 5 6 Blunt R 24 12 5 McCaskill D 82 79 74 Daines R 12 5 3 Tester D 88 86 86 Fischer R 6 2 7 Sasse R 0 0 0 Heller R 24 14 13 Reid D 100 100 82 Ayotte R 47 52 38 Shaheen D 100 98 95 Booker D 100 100 98 Menendez D 100 100 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a MICHIGAN a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a MINNESOTA a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a MISSISSIPPI ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ MISSOURI a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a MONTANA ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ NEBRASKA ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ NEVADA a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ NEW HAMPSHIRE a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ NEW JERSEY 16 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV National Mon uments Energy Effi ciency Fast Tracking Limiting Pu blic Safegu ards Taxpayer Han douts for Fo ssil Fuel Com panies Genetically Modified Fo od Labeling Encouragin g Energy-E fficient Hom es Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Wind Energy Transmission Line Victory Bond s for Clean Energy Attack on th e Clean Wat er Rule Attack on A dvanced Ve hicles Water Cons ervation Prog ram Mitigating Im pacts on Fish & Wildlife Revenue Sh aring for Off shore Drillin g KEY Clean Energy Funding SENATE VOTES c d e f g h LCV SCORES 2016 114th Con gress Lifetime % % % b Natural Gas Pipelines Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i= Ineligible to vote s =Absence (counts as negative) Extreme Att ac Protections k on Clean Water (CRA) = a i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1% 1^ 1& Heinrich D 100 98 94 Udall D 100 95 96 Gillibrand D 100 100 94 Schumer D 100 100 91 Burr R 24 12 8 Tillis R 18 10 10 Heitkamp D 53 45 50 Hoeven R 12 5 9 Brown, S. D 100 98 93 Portman R 35 19 21 Inhofe R 12 5 5 Lankford R 6 5 5 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a NEW YORK a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a NORTH CAROLINA ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ NORTH DAKOTA ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ OHIO a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ OKLAHOMA ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ OREGON Merkley D 100 100 99 Wyden D 100 95 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Casey D 100 93 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Toomey R 0 0 7 PENNSYLVANIA ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ RHODE ISLAND a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Reed, J. D 100 100 96 Whitehouse D 100 100 98 Graham, L. R 29 19 13 ✘ a Scott, T. R 0 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ SOUTH CAROLINA 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 17 2. SENATE SCORES NEW MEXICO KEY LCV SCORES 2016 114th Con gress Lifetime Clean Energy Funding National Mon uments Energy Effi ciency Fast Tracking Natural Gas Pipelines Limiting Pu blic Safegu ards Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action i= Ineligible to vote s =Absence (counts as negative) Extreme Att ac Protections k on Clean Water (CRA) = a Taxpayer Han douts for Fo ssil Fuel Com panies Genetically Modified Fo od Labeling Encouragin g Energy-E fficient Hom es Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Wind Energy Transmission Line Victory Bond s for Clean Energy Attack on th e Clean Wat er Rule Attack on A dvanced Ve hicles Water Cons ervation Prog ram Mitigating Im pacts on Fish & Wildlife Revenue Sh aring for Off shore Drillin g S E N AT E VOT E S % % % b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1% 1^ 1& ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ SOUTH DAKOTA Rounds R 6 2 2 Thune R 0 2 11 ✘ ✘ Alexander R 41 31 22 Corker R 0 2 12 ✘ Cornyn R 6 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Cruz* R 0 0 3 Hatch R 12 5 10 5 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a 6 ✘ ✘ a R ✘ ✘ ✘ Lee, M. ✘ TENNESSEE ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ TEXAS UTAH ✘ VERMONT Leahy D Sanders** I 6 62 91 Kaine D 100 93 93 Warner D 88 83 86 Cantwell D 100 98 91 Murray D 100 98 90 Capito R 24 12 18 Manchin D 47 43 44 Baldwin D 100 100 97 Johnson, R. R 6 2 5 Barrasso R 12 5 9 Enzi R 12 5 5 100 100 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a VIRGINIA a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a WASHINGTON a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a WEST VIRGINIA ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ WISCONSIN a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ WYOMING ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ * Senator Cruz missed a number of votes while campaigning for U.S. president. ** Senator Sanders missed a number of votes while campaigning for U.S. president. 18 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2016 HOUSE VOTE DESCRIPTIONS 1. DELAYING THE RESOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL COURT CASES Representative Doug Collins (R-GA) sponsored H.R. 712, the Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2015, which would weaken environmental protections by undermining the federal rulemaking process and citizen enforcement of federal laws. H.R. 712 prescribes a host of burdensome and sometimes ambiguous steps for courts and parties that would favor continued litigation over settlement. This bill would delay and obstruct the resolution of environmental protection cases before federal courts. On January 7, the House approved H.R. 712 by a vote of 244-173 (House roll call vote 12). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation. 2. MINING WASTE Representative Alexander Mooney (R-WV) sponsored H.R. 1644, the Supporting Transparent Regulatory and Environmental Actions in Mining (STREAM) Act, a disastrous bill that would block proposed safeguards that aim to reduce the health and environmental impacts of destructive coal mining practices. H.R. 1644 would stop or at least seriously delay the finalization of the Department of Interior’s proposed Stream Protection Rule, which will better protect mining communities whose drinking water is currently at risk of contamination from inappropriate dumping of toxic mining pollution. As one of the most damaging industrial activities in our nation, mountaintop removal mining has destroyed more than 2,000 miles of streams and over 500 mountains in Central Appalachia while also jeopardizing the health of nearby communities. The Stream Protection Rule will finally update federal rules that fall woefully short of preventing serious harm to the communities living near coal mining operations. On January 12, the House approved H.R. 1644 by a vote of 235-188 (House roll call vote 42). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation. 3. EXTREME ATTACK ON CLEAN WATER PROTECTIONS (CRA) Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) sponsored S.J. Res. 22, a Congressional Review Act “Resolution of Disapproval,” which would void the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Clean Water Rule that protects the small streams and wetlands that feed into the drinking water of 117 million people in this country. Not only would this obscure and radical legislative tool vacate the current rule, it would also prohibit the agencies from developing any “substantially similar” rule in the future, keeping the unworkable status quo in place. This could prevent the agencies from ever issuing rules that establish Clean Water Act protections for the waters covered by the Clean Water Rule, leaving our streams, wetlands, lakes, and rivers vulnerable to pollution for generations to come. On January 13, the House approved S.J. Res. 22 by a vote of 253-166 (House roll call vote 45). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. S.J. Res. 22 was vetoed by President Obama on January 20. 4. FEDERAL CONTROL OVER FEDERAL WATERS Representative Don Beyer (D-VA) offered an amendment to H.R. 2406, the Sportsmen’s Heritage and Recreational Enhancement Act of 2015, which would strike the bill’s requirement that the Interior and Commerce secretaries consult with state fish and game agencies before restricting fishing in marine national parks and other federally managed waters. Marine national parks, marine sanctuaries, and other federally managed waters are managed for the benefit of all people in the United States and 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 19 should not be subject to veto power by state agencies. On February 26, the House rejected the Beyer amendment by a vote of 169-236 (House roll call vote 94). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. H.R. 2406 passed the House on February 26, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 5. ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Representative Jared Huffman (D-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 2406, the Sportsmen’s Heritage and Recreational Enhancement Act of 2015, which would grant the highest level of protection—a wilderness designation—for the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Following extensive scientific study and public input, the Fish and Wildlife Service released a Comprehensive Conservation Plan in 2015, which recommended that the coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge should receive the highest level of protection to preserve the land’s unparalleled wild character. This amendment would ensure that this majestic landscape would remain untouched by industrialization and drilling operations, thus protecting a landscape that is home to large populations of caribou, polar bears and more than 135 species of migratory birds. On February 26, the House rejected the Huffman amendment by a vote of 176-227 (House roll call vote 99). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 6. UNDERMINING PUBLIC LANDS AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Representative Rob Wittman (R-VA) sponsored H.R. 2406, the Sportsmen’s Heritage and Recreational Enhancement Act of 2015, which contains harmful measures undermining the National Environmental Policy Act, the Wilderness Act, and other bedrock environmental laws. The bill includes language that could allow the use of motorized vehicles, road construction, and other forms of development within protected wilderness areas, and it blocks input from public stakeholders in National Wildlife Refuge management decisions. This legislation also includes provisions that would weaken the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate toxic lead in ammunition and fishing equipment. Additionally, this bill would undermine international commitments to combat ivory trafficking, thwart our ability to effectively manage marine resources, and cut the public out of management decisions impacting hundreds of millions of acres of public lands. On February 26, the House approved H.R. 2406 by a vote of 242-161 (House roll call vote 101). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation. 7. ATTACK ON CLEAN AIR PROTECTIONS Representative Keith Rothfus (R-PA) sponsored H.R. 3797, the Satisfying Energy Needs and Saving the Environment (SENSE) Act, which would weaken clean air protections that safeguard our air from coal refuse burned by power plants. The SENSE Act would weaken the Cross State Air Pollution Rule by replacing the state emissions reductions rules with federal rules that allow waste coal burning power plants to pollute in excess of current law, damaging public health in the surrounding areas and far downwind. H.R. 3797 would also weaken the Environmental Protection Agency’s Mercury and Air Toxics standards, which are successful safeguards that are designed to reduce the pollution associated with dangerous compounds like sulfur dioxide and hydrogen chloride, both of which increase the risk of asthma attacks and other serious health impacts, including premature deaths. On March 15, the House approved H.R. 3797 by a vote of 231-183 (House roll call vote 123). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation. 20 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 8. PESTICIDES POLLUTION Representative Bob Gibbs (R-OH) sponsored H.R. 897, the Zika Vector Control Act, which would undermine the Clean Water Act by preventing the Environmental Protection Agency from protecting waterways from the direct application of pesticides that can contaminate drinking water, harm aquatic species, and negatively impact the food chain. This bill would render ineffective the Clean Water Act pesticide general permit, which took effect in 2011 and laid out commonsense practices for applying pesticides directly to waterways. Additionally, the permit already allows for emergency spraying to combat vector-borne diseases such as Zika. On May 17, the House rejected H.R. 897 under suspension of the rules by a vote of 262-159 (A 2/3 vote was needed for passage; House roll call vote 199). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. H.R. 897 passed the House on May 24. 9. FOSSIL ENERGY BILL Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) sponsored S. 2012, the Senate’s Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015, which the House amended with a bill that would promote devastating logging projects, curtail National Environmental Policy Act reviews as well as state, local, and tribal authority over projects on their own lands, and allow pipelines to be built on National Park land without the necessary environmental reviews. The House version of S. 2012 locks in dirty fossil energy for decades to come at a time when we should be investing in cleaner, cheaper alternatives. On May 25, the House passed S. 2012 by a vote of 241-178 (House roll call vote 250). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. S. 2012 moved to conference committee, but did not become law. 10. NATIONAL OCEAN POLICY Representative Sam Farr (D-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5055, the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would have struck a damaging policy rider that prohibited funds from being used to further implement marine planning efforts and the ecosystem-based management components of the National Ocean Policy. The National Ocean Policy directs government agencies with differing mandates to work collaboratively to improve ocean health and also ensures that all competing interests—including conservationists, fishermen, scientists, shipping companies, port managers, energy developers, and those who live and work in ocean communities—have a voice in creating solutions for the many problems facing our oceans. On May 25, the House rejected the Farr amendment by a vote of 189-228 (House roll call vote 253). YES IS THE PROENVIRONMENT VOTE. 11. LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND (LWCF) Representative Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) sponsored a Motion to Instruct Conferees who were named to the House and Senate conference committee for S. 2012, the Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015. This non-binding resolution instructed conferees to accept Section 5002 of the Energy Policy and Modernization Act—a permanent authorization of the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) with a minimum of 40 percent of appropriated funds dedicated to state projects and 40 percent dedicated to federal projects—for inclusion in the final conference report. Section 5002 also requires federal agencies to take into account management efficiencies, cost savings, urgency of proposed acquisitions, and 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 21 other factors when choosing projects and dedicates 1.5 percent of the fund to increasing sportsmen’s access on public lands. LWCF is America’s premier conservation program and has helped increase park access and protect public lands in nearly every county in the nation for over 50 years. On May 25, the House rejected the Motion to Instruct Conferees by a vote of 205-212 (House roll call vote 264). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. S. 2012 did not become law. 12. FRACKING CLEAN AIR LOOPHOLE Representative Jared Polis (D-CO) offered an amendment to H.R. 4775, the Ozone Standards Implementation Act of 2016, which would close loopholes in the Clean Air Act that allow the oil and gas industry to release dangerous amounts of air pollution. Other industries are required to limit their releases of toxic air pollutants like volatile organic compounds and smog-inducing nitrogen oxides, but oil and gas companies lobbied for and won an exemption that allows them to continue endangering public health. The amendment also adds hydrogen sulfide, a harmful, potentially fatal pollutant mainly released during oil and gas extraction, to the Clean Air Act’s list of hazardous pollutants. On June 8, the House rejected the Polis amendment 160-251 (House roll call vote 279). YES IS THE PROENVIRONMENT VOTE. 13. ATTACK ON THE CLEAN AIR ACT AND SMOG PROTECTIONS Representative Pete Olson (R-TX) sponsored H.R. 4775, the Ozone Standards Implementation Act of 2016, which would jeopardize the health of people in the United States by undermining the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) recently-updated standards for ozone pollution, also known as smog. This legislation would delay the implementation of these vital health protections by at least ten years and double the Clean Air Act’s current five-year review periods for updating all national air quality standards, thereby allowing unhealthy air to persist even longer. H.R. 4775 would also eviscerate a central pillar of the Clean Air Act that requires the EPA to rely solely on the best-available health science when setting air quality standards, forcing the agency to consider factors unrelated to health, like technical feasibility, in the initial standard setting process. On June 8, the House passed H.R. 4775 by a vote of 234-177 (House roll call vote 282). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation. 14. MILITARY RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE CHANGE Representative Ken Buck (R-CO) offered an amendment to H.R. 5293, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2017, which would prohibit the U.S. military from continuing to research and prepare for the effects climate change will have on military installations. On June 16, the House approved the Buck amendment by a vote of 216-205 (House roll call vote 314). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. H.R. 5293 failed cloture in the Senate on September 6. 15. METHANE POLLUTION FROM DRILLING ON PUBLIC LANDS Representative Jared Huffman (D-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would remove a provision preventing the Bureau of Land Management from finalizing its Methane and Waste Prevention Rule. This important rule will reduce dangerous methane pollution, a climate super-pollutant that is 22 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV vented, flared, and leaked from oil and gas industry operations on our public lands. Reducing natural gas waste from public lands will not only benefit the climate, but it will also reduce toxic air pollutants that are jeopardizing the health of nearby communities and ensure taxpayers receive a fair return on their resources. On July 12, the House rejected the Huffman amendment by a vote of 184-240 (House roll call vote 422). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 16. PROTECTING OUR FORESTS Representative Debbie Dingell (D-MI) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would strike the harmful language that wholly exempt a broad range of potentially damaging logging activities in our National Forest System from public accountability and other National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements. Damaging our national forest resources harms both the public and the economic benefits that our federal forests provide for all people in this country, including clean drinking water, outstanding recreational opportunities, and fish and wildlife habitat, which also supports more jobs and economic output than other activities in the National Forest System. On July 12, the House rejected the Dingell amendment by a vote of 170-256 (House roll call vote 428). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 17. LEAD POISONING SAFEGUARDS Representative Matt Cartwright (D-PA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would strike a rider from the bill that delayed the Environmental Protection Agency’s Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting Program, which requires the use of safe practices and actions aimed at preventing lead poisoning in homes and elsewhere. On July 12, the House rejected the Cartwright amendment by a vote of 195-231 (House roll call vote 429). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 18. CARBON POLLUTION On behalf of House Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Congressman Scott Peters (D-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would have struck damaging language in the bill that blocked implementation of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, including termination of any assistance to states that have asked for help developing sensible state policies. The Clean Power Plan establishes the first national carbon pollution limits for new and existing power plants and is the single biggest step our country has ever taken to tackle climate change. Communities across the United States are already suffering from the devastating impacts of climate change, such as more frequent and severe weather events like droughts, wildfires, floods, and storms, and unchecked climate change also threatens public health. On July 12, the House rejected the Pallone amendment by a vote of 182-244 (House roll call vote 431). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 23 19. RECOGNIZING THE COST OF CLIMATE CHANGE Representative Scott Peters (D-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would strike a provision in the bill that would recklessly eliminate any consideration of the Social Cost of Carbon, which is an analysis of the real economic impacts, positive or negative, of the carbon pollution of a project or proposed rule. The Social Cost of Carbon is a critical tool that helps the public and decision makers understand the true benefits and costs of a project and the possible ways to mitigate negative impacts. Requiring an environmental review that prohibits the consideration of climate impacts institutionalizes climate denial into the federal permitting process and forces ill-informed decisions, putting critical infrastructure, taxpayer dollars, and local communities’ health at risk. On July 12, the House rejected the Peters amendment by a vote of 185-241 (House roll call vote 432). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 20. PROTECTING FARMWORKERS FROM DANGEROUS PESTICIDES Representative Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would strike a rider in the bill preventing the Environmental Protection Agency from enforcing the recently updated Agricultural Worker Protection Standard. This important set of revisions will finally give farmworkers the same protections as workers in other industries and better protect them from pesticide poisoning while ensuring their right to a designated representative to request information. The health of farmworkers, their families, and their communities are disproportionately jeopardized and impacted by toxic pesticides, and these critical new safeguards are long overdue. On July 13, the House rejected the Grijalva amendment by a vote of 177-249 (House roll call vote 433). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 21. METHANE POLLUTION SAFEGUARDS Representative Jared Polis (D-CO) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would strike a rider in the underlying bill that prevents the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from implementing its recently finalized methane pollution standards, the first-ever limits on methane pollution from new and modified sources in the oil and gas industry. The EPA’s methane standard for new and modified sources requires low-cost, proven safeguards that are critical to reducing methane’s contributions to climate change, with climate benefits of $170 million by 2025, while also curbing toxic air pollutants that contribute to smog and jeopardize the health of nearby communities. On July 13, the House rejected the Polis amendment by a vote of 187-240 (House roll call vote 434). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 22. CALIFORNIA WATER RESOURCES Representative Jerry McNerney (D-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would remove ideological riders that would weaken protections for fish, birds, and other wildlife in California’s Bay-Delta. These provisions would undermine the Endangered Species Act, jeopardizing populations of salmon 24 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV and other local fisheries, they would threaten the habitat of millions of birds by undermining the water rights of wildlife refuges, and they would put at risk thousands of jobs that rely on a healthy Bay-Delta. The rider would also have ramifications across other western states, including reducing public input and review of water projects, lowering funding for the Bureau of Reclamation, and limiting states’ and the federal government’s ability to manage and protect water resources. These dangerous provisions prioritize the interests of large agribusinesses and use California’s drought as an excuse to weaken federal and state environmental laws. On July 13, the House rejected the McNerney amendment by a vote of 181-248 (House roll call vote 436). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 23. NATIONAL MONUMENTS Representative Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would have struck damaging anti-parks language in the bill that prohibited the president from designating national monuments on over 160 million acres of our public lands. The Antiquities Act provided initial protections for nearly half of America’s national parks—including the Grand Canyon, Acadia, Muir Woods, and Olympic National Parks—and this amendment ensures that more special places can be protected for future generations. On July 13, the House rejected the Grijalva amendment by a vote of 202-225 (House roll call vote 437). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 24. OFFSHORE DRILLING IN THE EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO Representative Gwen Graham (D-FL) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would prohibit the use of funds for the research, investigation, or study of offshore drilling in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico, an area currently off-limits to drilling that attracts millions of tourists each year and is also home to many species of wildlife. On July 13, the House rejected the Graham amendment by a vote of 185-243 (House roll call vote 447). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 25. ATTACK ON THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Representative Doug Lamborn (R-CO) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would bar the listing, under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), of any species that has not undergone a periodic five-year review, an attack that would dramatically undermine protections for endangered species. The relevant agencies are often unable to complete these reviews on time due to lack of funding or because of competing priorities. This amendment would leave many species in a state of limbo, because they would keep their ESA status, but all federal funding for recovery efforts, law enforcement efforts, and consultations would be prohibited. On July 13, the House approved the Lamborn amendment by a vote of 238-190 (House roll call vote 449). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 25 26. GRAY WOLVES Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would prohibit the listing of the Gray Wolf as endangered in the lower 48 states. This amendment would jeopardize the tenuous recovery of a keystone predator, with negative consequences at every level of the ecosystem. On July 13, the House approved the Newhouse amendment by a vote of 223-201 (House roll call vote 452). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 27. EPA LAW ENFORCEMENT Representative Gary Palmer (R-AL) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would prohibit the use of funds for the Environmental Protection Agency’s law enforcement and criminal investigations division, a move that would make it harder to hold polluters accountable for committing environmental crimes. On July 13, the House rejected the Palmer amendment by a vote of 195-223 (House roll call vote 453). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. 28. ATTACK ON ENVIRONMENTAL COURT ACCESS Representative Jason Smith (R-MO) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would prohibit funds from being used to pay legal fees for settlements in Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, or Endangered Species Act cases. Congress long ago recognized that the government needs citizens to be partners in enforcing America’s laws, including environmental protection laws, and this principle is enshrined in numerous federal laws that provide reasonable fee recovery for successful plaintiffs. This amendment would alter this principle by prohibiting payment of citizens’ legal fees when parties avoid costly litigation by agreeing to a settlement. Failing to pay citizens’ legal fees would make it harder for all but the wealthiest Americans and corporations to hold violators of America’s environmental laws accountable through legal channels. On July 13, the House approved the Smith amendment by a vote of 226-202. (House roll call vote 459). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 29. ARCTIC OCEAN DRILLING Representative Don Young (R-AK) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would block the removal of three proposed Arctic Ocean lease sales that were contained in the federal government’s draft 2017-2022 offshore drilling leasing plan. The Arctic Ocean is ecologically rich, fragile, unforgiving, and remote. Furthermore, the region lacks the infrastructure to contain or clean up an oil spill. This amendment, by attempting to keep portions of the Arctic Ocean open for leasing, would put this important place at risk of an oil spill and make climate change worse. On July 13, the House approved the Young amendment by a vote of 242-185 (House roll call vote 461). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 26 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 30. MARINE NATIONAL MONUMENTS Representative Lee Zeldin (R-NY) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would block any president from permanently protecting new marine national monuments anywhere in the United States’ Exclusive Economic Zone. This overly broad provision would block the potential of future protections for over 4.5 million square miles of U.S. waters, hamstringing our country’s future contributions to global ocean conservation. On July 13, the House approved the Zeldin amendment by a vote of 225-202 (House roll call vote 462). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 31. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT RIDERS Representative Don Beyer (D-VA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would have removed three damaging policy riders in the bill. These riders would undermine Endangered Species Act protections for the gray wolf, the greater sage-grouse, and the lesser prairie-chicken. This amendment would also block language in the bill that undermines a historic conservation agreement for the greater sage-grouse and would effectively give states control over 60 million acres of America’s shared public lands. On July 13, the House rejected the Beyer amendment by a vote of 193-235 (House roll call vote 463). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 32. BLOCKING PROTECTIONS FOR CLEAN WATER Representative Don Beyer (D-VA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would strike four anti-clean water provisions in the underlying bill. These riders attack fundamental pollution safeguards for our waterways, including blocking the Department of the Interior’s final Stream Protection Rule, which will better protect the drinking water of communities living in the shadows of coal mining operations, preventing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from updating the definition of “fill material” under the Clean Water Act, which would prevent mountaintop mining operators from filling valley streams with mining waste, expanding exemptions under the Clean Water Act that would allow more dumping of pollution into waterways, and blocking the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers’ Clean Water Rule, which protects the small streams and wetlands that feed into the drinking water of one in three people in the United States. On July 14, the House rejected the Beyer amendment by a vote of 178-246 (House roll call vote 468). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 33. CLEAN ENERGY & PUBLIC LANDS Representative Alan Lowenthal (D-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would prohibit using funds in contravention of a Department of Interior order calling for the development of clean energy on public lands. Public lands represent a significant resource for wind and solar development, which we must expand to fight climate change. On July 14, the House rejected the Lowenthal amendment 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 27 by a vote of 192-233 (House roll call vote 471). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 34. SAGE GROUSE CONSERVATION Representative Niki Tsongas (D-MA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would prohibit the Bureau of Land Management’s management plans from taking effect if they limit the bureau’s ability to meet multiple use obligations, a measure that would protect plans to conserve the threatened sage grouse’s habitat across the western United States. On July 14, the House rejected the Tsongas amendment by a vote of 184-241 (House roll call vote 474). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation. 35. ANTI-ENVIRONMENTAL SPENDING BILL House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee Chair Ken Calvert (R-CA) sponsored H.R. 5538, the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, a spending bill that ought to be about dollars and cents, and yet it contained more than 30 anti-environmental policy riders. The riders included attacks on the federal government’s ability to set commonsense limits on carbon pollution from power plants, protect the drinking water of one in three people in the United States, and create new parks. Besides containing ideological, poison-pill riders that simply have no place in a spending bill, this legislation significantly slashed funding for key environmental programs and agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Land and Water Conservation Fund. On July 14, the House approved H.R. 5538 by a vote of 231-196 (House roll call vote 477). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation. 36. DELAYING SAFEGUARDS Representative Tom Marino (R-PA) sponsored H.R. 3438, the Require Evaluation before Implementing Executive Wishlists (REVIEW) Act of 2016, which would delay all major regulations from taking effect until all litigation is resolved. This radical attack on federal safeguards would allow frivolous litigation to halt the implementation of critical safeguards for clean air, clean water, public health, and more. On September 21, the House approved H.R. 3438 by a vote of 244-180 (House roll call vote 535). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation. 37. DISASTER FUNDING FOR FLINT, MICHIGAN Representative Dan Kildee (D-MI) offered an amendment to H.R. 5303, the Water Resources Development Act of 2016, designed to provide federal financial assistance to the city of Flint, Michigan, which suffered a public health crisis after decisions to switch the city’s drinking water supply caused toxic lead to leach from pipes into the water. For over two years, Flint residents have lacked access to clean water and have been waiting for government aid to help deal with the impacts of lead poisoning, particularly for the city’s over 8,000 children who may experience serious and permanent health problems such as behavioral and neurological disorders. The Kildee amendment would authorize $170 million in funding to repair or replace water infrastructure in Flint and would assist the city in recovering from 28 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV this crisis. On September 28, the House passed the Kildee amendment by a vote of 284-141-1 (House roll call vote 570). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Kildee amendment providing the city of Flint with $170 million in funding to address their public health crisis was ultimately included in the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (WIIN), which was signed into law by President Obama on December 16. 38. ATTACK ON PUBLIC PROTECTIONS Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) sponsored H.R. 5982, the Midnight Rules Relief Act of 2016, which would threaten public protections affecting the environment, public health, and safety that are often years, if not decades, in the making. This bill would amend the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to allow for an en bloc disapproval of all regulations finalized near the end of presidential terms. In addition to nullifying standards through a rushed and non-transparent process, this extreme legislation would prohibit similar standards from being developed in the future. On November 17, the House passed H.R. 5982 by a vote of 240-179 (House roll call vote 585). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation. 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 29 Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og Military Resi lience to Clim ate 114th Con gre Lifetime % % % b c d e i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ f g h ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Change National Oce an Policy 2016 ss Fossil Energy Bill Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te LCV SCORES = a Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections KEY Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution HOUSE VOTES ALABAMA 1 Byrne R 0 0 0 2 Roby R 3 3 4 3 Rogers, M. R 3 1 6 4 Aderholt R 3 3 4 5 Brooks, M. R 3 5 7 6 Palmer R 0 3 3 7 Sewell* D 82 77 78 R 3 4 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ALASKA AL Young, Don** ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ARIZONA 1 Kirkpatrick D 76 70 68 2 McSally R 3 3 3 3 Grijalva D 95 96 95 4 Gosar R 0 1 5 5 Salmon R 0 0 8 6 Schweikert R 0 0 5 7 Gallego, R.† D 97 97 97 8 Franks R 3 3 4 9 Sinema D 87 74 77 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ARKANSAS 1 Crawford R 3 3 5 2 Hill R 5 4 4 3 Womack R 3 3 4 4 Westerman R 0 1 1 3 1 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ CALIFORNIA 1 LaMalfa R 2 Huffman D 3 Garamendi D 100 100 87 89 99 89 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ * Representative Sewell entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call vote 453, which would have been scored as pro-environment. ** Representative Young entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 264, which would have been scored as pro-environment. † Representative Gallego entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 453, which would have been scored as pro-environment. 30 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Arctic Ocean Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n Anti-Enviro Delaying Sa Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2* 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% 3^ 3& 3* ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ns ic Protectio feguards ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3. HOUSE SCORES ✘ ✘ a ichigan Attack on En vi 2) nmental Sp ending Bill EPA Law En fo 1( Drilling Offshore Dril ling in urt Access National Mon uments 1* ronmental Co California W ater Resour ce 1& rcement Methane Po the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Recognizing 1^ s Carbon Pollu tion 1% llution Safe guards Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 31 HOUSE VOTES Lifetime Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution Fossil Energy Bill National Oce an Policy Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og Military Resi lience to Clim ate % % b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ss Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) 4 McClintock R 0 0 4 5 Thompson, M. D 100 96 93 6 Matsui* D 97 97 96 7 Bera D 97 92 91 8 Cook R 3 3 3 9 McNerney D 10 Denham R 3 4 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 11 DeSaulnier D 100 99 99 12 Pelosi D 100 100 93 13 Lee, B. D 100 96 96 14 Speier D 100 96 90 15 Swalwell** D 97 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 55 49 48 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 17 Honda D 100 100 98 18 Eshoo† D 97 99 97 19 Lofgren D 100 84 90 20 Farr D 95 96 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a D a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Costa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 16 a a a a a a a a a a 21 Valadao R 5 4 3 22 Nunes R 3 1 3 23 McCarthy R 3 1 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 24 Capps D 97 96 96 25 Knight R 0 0 0 26 Brownley D 100 100 97 27 Chu D 97 99 97 28 Schiff D 100 100 98 29 Cárdenas‡ D 84 89 90 30 Sherman D 100 100 97 31 Aguilar D 100 97 100 100 97 94 Change 114th Con gre % LCV SCORES = a Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections 2016 KEY a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a * Representative Matsui entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call vote 45, which would have been scored as pro-environment. ** R epresentative Swalwell entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 453, which would have been scored as pro-environment. † Representative Eshoo entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted roll on call vote 434, which would have been scored as pro-environment. ‡ Representative Cárdenas missed a number of votes due to a family matter and the California Primary Election. 32 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Arctic Ocean Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n Anti-Enviro Delaying Sa Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2* 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% 3^ 3& 3* ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ns ic Protectio feguards ichigan Attack on En vi 2) nmental Sp ending Bill EPA Law En fo 1( Drilling Offshore Dril ling in urt Access National Mon uments 1* ronmental Co California W ater Resour ce 1& rcement Methane Po the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Recognizing 1^ s Carbon Pollu tion 1% llution Safe guards Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 3. HOUSE SCORES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 33 Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og Military Resi lience to Clim ate 1! 1$ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ % % % b c d f a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 32 Napolitano* D 92 93 91 33 Lieu D 89 90 90 34 Becerra** D 89 92 92 35 Torres D 100 96 96 36 Ruiz D 100 97 93 37 Bass D 95 90 89 38 Sánchez, Linda D 95 97 92 39 Royce R 5 3 11 40 Roybal-Allard D 100 100 95 41 Takano D 100 100 99 42 Calvert R 5 4 6 43 Waters D 89 93 91 44 Hahn D 95 97 95 45 Walters R 5 4 4 46 Sánchez, Loretta D 66 74 86 47 Lowenthal D 100 100 48 Rohrabacher R 0 1 10 49 Issa R 3 1 4 50 Hunter R 0 1 2 51 Vargas D 100 99 96 52 Peters, S. D 97 93 93 53 Davis, S. D 100 99 97 99 g h i 1@ 1# Change National Oce an Policy 1) Lifetime j 114th Con gre e 2016 ss Fossil Energy Bill Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te LCV SCORES = a Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution KEY Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections HOUSE VOTES a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a COLORADO 1 DeGette D 100 100 97 2 Polis D 100 96 90 3 Tipton R 0 1 6 4 Buck R 0 1 1 5 Lamborn R 0 0 4 6 Coffman R 3 3 4 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a * Representative Napolitano entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call votes 94, 99, and 101, which would have all been scored as pro-environment. **Representative Becerra entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 94, 99, 101, and 123, which would have all been scored as pro-environment. 34 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Delaying Sa Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl 3* a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 2$ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ns 2# ic Protectio 2@ feguards 2! 3. HOUSE SCORES 2) ichigan Anti-Enviro 3& 1( nmental Sp ending Bill Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n 3^ 1* Drilling 3% 1& s urt Access Arctic Ocean 3$ 1^ ronmental Co Attack on En vi 3# 1% rcement EPA Law En fo the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s 3@ Offshore Dril ling in 3! National Mon uments 3) California W ater Resour ce llution Safe guards 2( Methane Po the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous 2* Recognizing 2& Carbon Pollu tion 2^ Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds 2% Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 35 % D 97 90 b c d e j 1) 1! 1$ f g 1@ 1# Change Military Resi lience to Clim ate % Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og % National Oce an Policy Lifetime Perlmutter 114th Con gre 7 2016 ss Fossil Energy Bill Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te LCV SCORES = a Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution KEY Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections HOUSE VOTES h i 84 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a CONNECTICUT a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 1 Larson, J. D 100 99 92 2 Courtney D 100 99 97 3 DeLauro* D 97 97 96 4 Himes** D 97 93 94 5 Esty D 100 100 99 D 92 93 91 ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ DELAWARE AL Carney FLORIDA 1 Miller, J. R 3 1 6 2 Graham, G. D 89 79 79 3 Yoho R 3 3 2 4 Crenshaw R 5 3 7 5 Brown, C. D 87 92 87 6 DeSantis R 3 1 2 7 Mica R 0 0 6 8 Posey R 5 5 6 9 Grayson D 10 Webster† R 0 3 6 11 Nugent R 5 5 5 12 Bilirakis R 5 3 10 13 Jolly R 21 14 13 14 Castor D 100 96 94 15 Ross R 3 1 4 16 Buchanan R 29 23 21 17 Rooney R 3 1 6 18 Murphy, P. D 92 89 83 19 Clawson R 16 10 8 20 Hastings‡ D 37 66 82 100 100 98 a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a * Representative DeLauro entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call vote 12, which would have been scored as pro-environment. **Representative Himes entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 453, which would have been scored as pro-environment. † Representative Webster entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 447, which would have been scored as pro-environment. ‡ Representative Hastings missed a number of votes due to his presence in his congressional district. 36 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Attack on Pu bl 2( 3) 3% 3^ 3& 3* 3! 3@ 3# 3$ ns ic Protectio feguards ichigan Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M 2* nmental Sp ending Bill 2& Drilling Delaying Sa urt Access Anti-Enviro 2^ Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n 2% Arctic Ocean 2$ ronmental Co 2# Attack on En vi 2@ rcement 2! EPA Law En fo the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Offshore Dril ling in 2) s 1( National Mon uments 1* California W ater Resour ce 1& llution Safe guards Recognizing 1^ Methane Po Carbon Pollu tion the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds 1% Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 3. HOUSE SCORES a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 37 National Oce an Policy Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og Military Resi lience to Clim ate 2016 114th Con gre Lifetime ss % % % f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1$ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) b 21 Deutch D 100 84 91 22 Frankel D 100 100 99 23 Wasserman Schultz D 100 95 93 24 Wilson, F. D 95 96 91 25 Diaz-Balart R 8 5 11 26 Curbelo R 53 38 38 27 Ros-Lehtinen R 45 30 34 ✘ ✘ ✘ c ✘ a a d ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ i i i i i 1# Change Fossil Energy Bill e LCV SCORES = a Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections KEY Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution HOUSE VOTES ✘ GEORGIA 1 Carter, E.L. R 0 0 0 ✘ 2 Bishop, S. D 47 51 49 a ✘ ✘ 3 Westmoreland R 3 3 3 4 Johnson, H. D 100 100 95 5 Lewis D 97 90 92 6 Price, T. R 0 0 4 7 Woodall R 3 1 4 8 Scott, A. R 0 0 3 9 Collins, D. R 0 1 3 10 Hice R 0 0 0 11 Loudermilk R 0 0 0 12 Allen R 0 0 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 13 Scott, D. D 82 81 81 14 Graves, T. R 0 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ i i i a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ i i i i i i HAWAII 1 Hanabusa* D 100 100 89 1 Takai* D N/A 90 90 2 Gabbard D 100 100 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a IDAHO 1 Labrador R 0 3 5 2 Simpson R 13 8 7 ✘ ✘ D 82 84 79 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ILLINOIS 1 Rush a a a a a * Representative Hanabusa was sworn in on November 14, 2016, after Representative Takai passed away on July 20, 2016. 38 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Delaying Sa Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2% 2^ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ns 2$ ic Protectio 2# feguards 2@ s 2! ✘ ✘ ✘ 3. HOUSE SCORES 2) ichigan Anti-Enviro a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a a a 1( nmental Sp ending Bill Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n 3* 1* Drilling 3& 1& a a urt Access Arctic Ocean 3^ 1^ ronmental Co Attack on En vi 3% 1% rcement EPA Law En fo the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s 3$ Offshore Dril ling in 3# National Mon uments 3@ California W ater Resour ce llution Safe guards 3! Methane Po the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous 3) Recognizing 2( Carbon Pollu tion 2* Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds 2& Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ i i i a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ i i i i i i i i a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ i i i i i i i i i i i i a i i i a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a 39 % b c 2 Kelly, R. D 89 89 92 3 Lipinski D 95 90 89 4 Gutiérrez* D 97 93 91 5 Quigley D 100 99 98 a a a a 6 Roskam R 3 4 8 ✘ 7 Davis, D. D 97 96 92 8 Duckworth D 95 92 88 9 Schakowsky** D 97 99 97 10 Dold R 63 51 50 11 Foster D 100 99 92 12 Bost R 3 3 3 13 Davis, R. R 3 4 5 14 Hultgren R 0 0 5 15 Shimkus R 3 3 6 16 Kinzinger R 8 7 6 17 Bustos D 95 90 85 18 LaHood R 0 0 0 d e j 1) 1! 1$ 1@ 1# a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ g ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ f ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ h i Change Military Resi lience to Clim ate Lifetime % Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og 114th Con gre % National Oce an Policy 2016 ss Fossil Energy Bill Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te LCV SCORES = a Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution KEY Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections HOUSE VOTES ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ INDIANA 1 Visclosky D 100 97 80 2 Walorski R 3 1 1 3 Stutzman R 0 0 4 4 Rokita R 0 0 4 5 Brooks, S. R 5 4 3 6 Messer R 3 1 1 7 Carson D 97 96 93 8 Bucshon R 5 4 5 9 Young, T. R 5 3 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a IOWA 1 Blum R 3 3 3 2 Loebsack D 97 96 89 a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ * Representative Gutierrez entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 123, which would have been scored as pro-environment. * Representative Schakowsky entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call vote 314, which would have been scored as pro-environment. 40 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl 3# 3$ 3% 3^ 3& 3* a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Methane Po California W ater Resour ce National Mon uments Offshore Dril ling in 2# 2$ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2% ✘ 2^ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ns a a a a 2@ ic Protectio Recognizing a a a a 2! feguards Carbon Pollu tion a a a a s Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds a a a a 2) ✘ a 3. HOUSE SCORES 1( ichigan Delaying Sa 3@ 1* nmental Sp ending Bill Anti-Enviro 3! 1& Drilling Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n urt Access Arctic Ocean 3) 1^ ronmental Co Attack on En vi 2( 1% rcement 2* llution Safe guards EPA Law En fo the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous 2& Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 41 National Oce an Policy Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og Military Resi lience to Clim ate 2016 114th Con gre Lifetime ss % % % c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Change Fossil Energy Bill b LCV SCORES = a Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections KEY Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution HOUSE VOTES 3 Young, David R 3 3 3 ✘ 4 King, S. R 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ KANSAS 1 Huelskamp R 0 0 5 2 Jenkins, L. R 3 1 3 3 Yoder R 0 0 3 4 Pompeo R 3 1 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ KENTUCKY 1 Comer* R 0 0 0 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i 1 Whitfield* R 17 11 14 0 0 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ R ✘ ✘ a Guthrie ✘ ✘ a 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3 Yarmuth** D 92 92 93 4 Massie R 3 7 10 5 Rogers, H. R 5 3 9 6 Barr R 0 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a LOUISIANA 1 Scalise R 3 1 4 2 Richmond D 92 86 77 3 Boustany R 3 3 4 4 Fleming R 3 3 4 5 Abraham R 3 3 3 6 Graves, G. R 8 4 4 a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a MAINE 1 Pingree D 97 99 96 2 Poliquin R 21 15 15 a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ MARYLAND 1 Harris R 0 1 3 2 Ruppersberger D 95 88 85 3 Sarbanes D 100 96 96 4 Edwards D 95 97 97 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a * Representative Comer was sworn in on November 14, 2016, following the resignation of Representative Whitfield on September 6, 2016. **Representative Yarmuth entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 250, 253, and 264, which would all have been scored as pro-environment. 42 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Arctic Ocean Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n Anti-Enviro Delaying Sa Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2* 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% 3^ 3& 3* ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ns ic Protectio feguards a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ i i ✘ i i i ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ 3. HOUSE SCORES ✘ ichigan Attack on En vi 2) nmental Sp ending Bill EPA Law En fo 1( Drilling Offshore Dril ling in urt Access National Mon uments 1* ronmental Co California W ater Resour ce 1& rcement Methane Po the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Recognizing 1^ s Carbon Pollu tion 1% llution Safe guards Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 43 National Oce an Policy Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og Military Resi lience to Clim ate g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2016 114th Con gre Lifetime ss Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) % % % b c a a a a a a a a 5 Hoyer D 92 90 82 6 Delaney D 100 95 93 7 Cummings D 100 99 95 8 Van Hollen D 100 100 98 d f Change Fossil Energy Bill e LCV SCORES = a Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections KEY Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution HOUSE VOTES MASSACHUSETTS 1 Neal D 97 97 92 2 McGovern D 97 99 99 3 Tsongas D 100 97 95 4 Kennedy D 92 96 96 5 Clark, K. D 100 100 98 6 Moulton D 100 99 99 7 Capuano D 100 99 96 8 Lynch D 100 96 95 9 Keating D 97 95 96 MICHIGAN 1 Benishek R 5 4 5 2 Huizenga R 3 1 5 3 Amash R 8 14 15 4 Moolenaar R 3 3 3 5 Kildee D 100 97 97 6 Upton R 13 8 26 7 Walberg R 3 1 4 8 Bishop, M. R 5 4 4 9 Levin D 100 99 91 10 Miller, C. R 8 4 11 11 Trott R 5 4 4 ✘ 12 Dingell D 97 97 97 13 Conyers* D 97 96 81 14 Lawrence D 100 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a D 82 79 81 a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ MINNESOTA 1 Walz ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a * Representative Conyers entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 45, which would have been scored as pro-environment. 44 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Arctic Ocean Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n Anti-Enviro Delaying Sa Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2* 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% 3^ 3& 3* a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ns ic Protectio feguards a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3. HOUSE SCORES a ichigan Attack on En vi 2) nmental Sp ending Bill EPA Law En fo 1( Drilling Offshore Dril ling in urt Access National Mon uments 1* ronmental Co California W ater Resour ce 1& rcement Methane Po the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Recognizing 1^ s Carbon Pollu tion 1% llution Safe guards Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a 45 HOUSE VOTES Lifetime Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution Fossil Energy Bill National Oce an Policy Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og Military Resi lience to Clim ate % % b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ss 2 Kline R 3 3 4 3 Paulsen R 18 14 16 4 McCollum D 100 96 93 5 Ellison* D 87 93 93 6 Emmer R 0 1 1 7 Peterson D 18 16 33 8 Nolan D 89 85 83 Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Change 114th Con gre % LCV SCORES = a Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections 2016 KEY a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a MISSISSIPPI 1 Kelly, T. R 0 0 0 2 Thompson, B. D 97 92 81 3 Harper R 0 1 3 4 Palazzo R 0 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ MISSOURI 1 Clay D 100 93 89 2 Wagner R 5 3 3 3 Luetkemeyer R 0 1 4 4 Hartzler R 0 0 5 Cleaver** D 95 6 Graves, S. R 7 8 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 93 87 0 1 5 Long 0 0 2 Smith, J. R 0 0 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ R R 5 4 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a MONTANA AL Zinke NEBRASKA 1 Fortenberry R 16 12 18 2 Ashford D 55 44 44 3 Smith, Adrian R 0 1 5 ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ NEVADA 1 Titus D 95 95 95 2 Amodei R 3 3 3 ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ * Representative Ellison missed roll call votes 468, 471, 474, and 477 due to an emergency constituent issue in his district. **Representative Cleaver entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 12, which would have been scored as pro-environment. 46 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Attack on Pu bl 2( 3) 3% 3^ 3& 3* 3! 3@ 3# 3$ ns ic Protectio feguards ichigan Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M 2* nmental Sp ending Bill 2& Drilling Delaying Sa urt Access Anti-Enviro 2^ Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n 2% Arctic Ocean 2$ ronmental Co 2# Attack on En vi 2@ rcement 2! EPA Law En fo the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Offshore Dril ling in 2) s 1( National Mon uments 1* California W ater Resour ce 1& llution Safe guards Recognizing 1^ Methane Po Carbon Pollu tion the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds 1% Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3. HOUSE SCORES ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 47 HOUSE VOTES Lifetime Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution Fossil Energy Bill National Oce an Policy Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og Military Resi lience to Clim ate % % b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ss Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) 3 Heck, J. R 5 5 8 4 Hardy R 3 1 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ Change 114th Con gre % LCV SCORES = a Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections 2016 KEY NEW HAMPSHIRE 1 Guinta R 13 10 10 2 Kuster D 95 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ NEW JERSEY 1 Norcross D 100 96 95 2 LoBiondo R 50 37 57 3 MacArthur R 13 10 10 4 Smith, C. R 45 34 62 5 Garrett R 3 3 8 6 Pallone D 7 Lance R 13 12 21 8 Sires D 92 93 90 9 Pascrell D 97 97 93 10 Payne D 95 86 90 11 Frelinghuysen R 8 5 33 12 Watson Coleman D 100 100 100 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 100 100 96 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ NEW MEXICO 1 Lujan Grisham, M. D 100 90 89 2 Pearce R 0 3 4 3 Luján, B. D 100 97 96 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a NEW YORK 1 Zeldin R 8 11 11 2 King, P. R 13 11 16 3 Israel D 100 97 96 4 Rice, K. D 89 93 93 5 Meeks D 92 90 88 6 Meng D 100 97 96 7 Velázquez D 100 100 93 8 Jeffries D 95 96 48 97 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Arctic Ocean Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n Anti-Enviro Delaying Sa Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2* 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% 3^ 3& 3* ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ns ic Protectio feguards ichigan Attack on En vi 2) nmental Sp ending Bill EPA Law En fo 1( Drilling Offshore Dril ling in urt Access National Mon uments 1* ronmental Co California W ater Resour ce 1& rcement Methane Po the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Recognizing 1^ s Carbon Pollu tion 1% llution Safe guards Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a 3. HOUSE SCORES a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a 49 % 9 Clarke, Y. D 100 100 94 10 Nadler D 95 97 96 11 Donovan R 21 16 17 12 Maloney, C. D 97 97 95 13 Rangel D 100 96 83 14 Crowley* D 95 92 94 15 Serrano D 97 99 92 16 Engel D 97 96 92 17 Lowey D 100 100 94 18 Maloney, S. D 97 92 87 19 Gibson R 47 47 41 20 Tonko D 97 99 97 21 Stefanik R 29 19 19 22 Hanna R 37 32 22 23 Reed, T. R 8 7 6 24 Katko R 26 21 21 25 Slaughter D 100 96 91 26 Higgins, B. D 100 99 95 27 Collins, C. R 0 3 3 b c d e j 1) 1! 1$ f g h a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a i 1@ 1# Change Military Resi lience to Clim ate Lifetime % Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og 114th Con gre % National Oce an Policy 2016 ss Fossil Energy Bill Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te LCV SCORES = a Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution KEY Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a NORTH CAROLINA 1 Butterfield D 89 90 89 2 Ellmers R 0 3 4 3 Jones R 21 19 22 4 Price, D. D 5 Foxx R 0 0 4 6 Walker R 0 0 0 7 Rouzer R 0 0 0 8 Hudson R 0 0 1 9 Pittenger R 0 0 1 10 McHenry R 3 1 3 11 Meadows R 0 1 2 100 100 91 a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ * Representative Crowley entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 433, which would have been scored as pro-environment. 50 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2( 3) 3% a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ California W ater Resour ce National Mon uments Offshore Dril ling in 2@ 2# 2$ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3! 3@ ✘ 3# ✘ 3$ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ic Protectio Attack on Pu bl ✘ 2! feguards Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M ✘ 2) Methane Po 1( Drilling ✘ 1* ronmental Co ✘ 1& rcement ✘ 1^ s a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a Recognizing 3* Carbon Pollu tion 3& Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds 3^ Protecting O ur Forests Delaying Sa ns Anti-Enviro 2* ichigan Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n 2& nmental Sp ending Bill Arctic Ocean urt Access Attack on En vi 2^ llution Safe guards 2% 1% ✘ a a a a a a a 3. HOUSE SCORES EPA Law En fo the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ 51 % b c d e j 1) 1! 1$ f g h i 1@ 1# Change Military Resi lience to Clim ate Lifetime % Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og 114th Con gre % National Oce an Policy 2016 ss Fossil Energy Bill Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te LCV SCORES = a Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution KEY Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 12 Adams D 100 99 99 13 Holding R 0 0 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Cramer R 3 1 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 Chabot R 0 0 13 Wenstrup R 0 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3 Beatty D 100 99 97 4 Jordan R 0 1 4 5 Latta R 0 1 3 6 Johnson, B. R 0 1 4 7 Gibbs, B. R 0 0 8 Davidson* R 0 9 Kaptur D 10 Turner 11 NORTH DAKOTA AL OHIO a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 0 0 i i i i i i i i i i i i i 100 95 81 R 11 7 9 Fudge D 100 96 93 12 Tiberi R 0 1 9 13 Ryan, T. D 100 96 91 14 Joyce R 5 5 6 15 Stivers R 3 3 6 16 Renacci R 0 1 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ OKLAHOMA 1 Bridenstine R 0 1 3 2 Mullin R 0 1 1 3 Lucas R 0 1 4 4 Cole R 5 4 6 5 Russell R 0 3 3 OREGON 1 Bonamici D 100 99 98 2 Walden R 5 4 9 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ * Representative Davidson was sworn in on June 7, 2016. 52 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Attack on Pu bl 2( 3) 3% 3^ 3& 3* 3! 3@ 3# 3$ ns ic Protectio feguards ichigan Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M 2* nmental Sp ending Bill 2& Drilling Delaying Sa urt Access Anti-Enviro 2^ Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n 2% Arctic Ocean 2$ ronmental Co 2# Attack on En vi 2@ rcement 2! EPA Law En fo the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Offshore Dril ling in 2) s 1( National Mon uments 1* California W ater Resour ce 1& llution Safe guards Recognizing 1^ Methane Po Carbon Pollu tion the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds 1% Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3. HOUSE SCORES ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 53 % b c d e j 1) 1! 1$ f g h i 1@ 1# Change Military Resi lience to Clim ate Lifetime % Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og 114th Con gre % National Oce an Policy 2016 ss Fossil Energy Bill Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te LCV SCORES = a Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution KEY Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections HOUSE VOTES 3 Blumenauer* D 97 97 95 4 DeFazio D 95 93 91 5 Schrader D 76 67 71 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a i PENNSYLVANIA 1 Brady, R. D 97 93 86 2 Evans** D 100 100 100 2 Fattah** D 29 78 87 3 Kelly R 0 1 4 4 Perry R 0 1 3 5 Thompson, G. R 3 3 5 6 Costello R 39 27 27 7 Meehan R 29 22 14 8 Fitzpatrick R 47 36 41 9 Shuster R 3 3 6 10 Marino R 5 4 6 11 Barletta R 3 3 5 12 Rothfus R 0 1 3 13 Boyle D 100 100 100 14 Doyle D 100 92 76 15 Dent R 18 12 18 16 Pitts R 0 0 6 17 Cartwright D 100 97 97 18 Murphy, T. R 3 3 9 i i i i i i i i i i i i a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ i ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ RHODE ISLAND 1 Cicilline D 100 99 97 2 Langevin D 100 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a SOUTH CAROLINA 1 Sanford R 21 14 25 2 Wilson, J. R 0 0 3 3 Duncan, Jeff R 0 1 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ * Representative Blumenauer entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 585, which would have been scored as pro-environment. **Representative Evans was sworn in on November 14, 2016, following the resignation of Representative Fattah on June 23, 2016. 54 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Attack on Pu bl 2( 3) 3% 3^ 3& 3* 3! 3@ 3# 3$ ns ic Protectio feguards ichigan Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M 2* nmental Sp ending Bill 2& Drilling Delaying Sa urt Access Anti-Enviro 2^ Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n 2% Arctic Ocean 2$ ronmental Co 2# Attack on En vi 2@ rcement 2! EPA Law En fo the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Offshore Dril ling in 2) s 1( National Mon uments 1* California W ater Resour ce 1& llution Safe guards Recognizing 1^ Methane Po Carbon Pollu tion the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds 1% Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i a i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ 3. HOUSE SCORES i ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 55 HOUSE VOTES Lifetime Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution Fossil Energy Bill National Oce an Policy Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og Military Resi lience to Clim ate % % b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ss Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Change 114th Con gre % LCV SCORES = a Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections 2016 KEY 4 Gowdy R 0 0 3 5 Mulvaney R 0 1 6 6 Clyburn D 92 88 84 7 Rice, T. R 0 1 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ R 0 1 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a SOUTH DAKOTA AL Noem TENNESSEE 1 Roe R 0 0 2 2 Duncan, John R 0 3 10 3 Fleischmann R 3 3 4 4 DesJarlais R 0 0 2 5 Cooper D 82 81 80 6 Black R 0 0 3 7 Blackburn R 0 0 2 8 Fincher R 0 0 3 9 Cohen D 100 100 97 a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a TEXAS 1 Gohmert R 0 1 4 2 Poe* R 0 0 4 3 Johnson, S. R 0 0 3 4 Ratcliffe R 0 0 0 5 Hensarling R 0 0 5 6 Barton R 0 1 6 7 Culberson R 3 1 4 8 Brady, K. R 0 0 3 9 Green, A. D 95 90 82 10 McCaul R 3 3 6 11 Conaway R 0 0 2 12 Granger R 3 1 5 13 Thornberry R 0 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ * Representative Poe missed a number of votes due to health reasons. 56 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Arctic Ocean Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n Anti-Enviro Delaying Sa Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2* 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% 3^ 3& 3* ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ns ic Protectio feguards ichigan Attack on En vi 2) nmental Sp ending Bill EPA Law En fo 1( Drilling Offshore Dril ling in urt Access National Mon uments 1* ronmental Co California W ater Resour ce 1& rcement Methane Po the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Recognizing 1^ s Carbon Pollu tion 1% llution Safe guards Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ 3. HOUSE SCORES ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 57 Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og Military Resi lience to Clim ate 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ % % % b c d f ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 14 Weber R 0 1 1 15 Hinojosa* D 92 77 68 16 O’Rourke** D 89 92 94 17 Flores R 0 0 3 ✘ 18 Jackson Lee D 92 89 79 19 Neugebauer R 0 0 2 ✘ 20 Castro† D 92 95 94 21 Smith, L. R 0 1 6 22 Olson R 0 0 2 23 Hurd R 3 1 1 24 Marchant R 0 0 3 25 Williams R 0 0 1 26 Burgess R 0 1 3 27 Farenthold R 0 1 3 28 Cuellar D 32 26 42 29 Green, G. D 82 73 65 30 Johnson, E.‡ D 95 92 84 31 Carter, J. R 0 0 4 32 Sessions, P. R 0 0 2 33 Veasey D 84 85 87 34 Vela D 82 81 71 35 Doggett D 100 99 97 36 Babin R 0 0 0 ✘ 1 Bishop, R. R 0 0 2 2 Stewart R 0 1 3 3 Chaffetz R 0 0 3 4 Love R 3 1 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ g h ✘ ✘ Change National Oce an Policy j Lifetime i 114th Con gre e 2016 ss Fossil Energy Bill Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te LCV SCORES = a Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution KEY Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a UTAH * Representative Hinojosa entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 101 and 199, which would have both been scored as pro-environment. **Representative O’Rourke entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 250, 253, and 264, which would have all been scored as pro-environment. † Representative Castro entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 250, which would have been scored as pro-environment. ‡ Representative Johnson entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call vote 12, which would have been scored as pro-environment. 58 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Arctic Ocean Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n Anti-Enviro Delaying Sa Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2* 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3% 3^ 3& 3* ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ns ic Protectio feguards ichigan Attack on En vi 2) nmental Sp ending Bill EPA Law En fo 1( Drilling Offshore Dril ling in urt Access National Mon uments 1* ronmental Co California W ater Resour ce 1& rcement Methane Po the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Recognizing 1^ s Carbon Pollu tion 1% llution Safe guards Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3. HOUSE SCORES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org a 59 % D 97 96 94 b c d e j 1) 1! 1$ f g 1@ 1# Change Military Resi lience to Clim ate Lifetime % Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og 114th Con gre % National Oce an Policy 2016 ss Fossil Energy Bill Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te LCV SCORES = a Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution KEY Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections HOUSE VOTES h i a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ VERMONT AL Welch VIRGINIA 1 Wittman R 0 1 12 2 Rigell R 5 3 8 3 Scott, R. D 4 Forbes R 0 0 4 5 Hurt R 3 1 4 6 Goodlatte R 0 0 6 7 Brat R 0 1 1 8 Beyer D 100 99 99 9 Griffith R 0 4 6 10 Comstock R 3 3 3 11 Connolly D 100 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ 100 100 90 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ WASHINGTON 1 DelBene D 97 96 94 2 Larsen, R. D 100 97 91 3 Herrera Beutler R 8 7 9 4 Newhouse R 0 1 1 5 McMorris Rodgers R 0 0 3 6 Kilmer D 97 96 92 7 McDermott D 92 96 92 8 Reichert R 34 21 37 9 Smith, Adam* D 82 85 89 10 Heck, D. D 97 97 96 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ WEST VIRGINIA 1 McKinley R 0 3 6 2 Mooney R 0 1 1 3 Jenkins, E. R 3 4 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ * Representative Smith entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 12, 42, 45, 94, 99, and 101, which would have been scored as pro-environment. 60 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Attack on Pu bl 2( 3) 3% 3^ 3& 3* 3! 3@ 3# 3$ ns ic Protectio feguards ichigan Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M 2* nmental Sp ending Bill 2& Drilling Delaying Sa urt Access Anti-Enviro 2^ Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n 2% Arctic Ocean 2$ ronmental Co 2# Attack on En vi 2@ rcement 2! EPA Law En fo the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Offshore Dril ling in 2) s 1( National Mon uments 1* California W ater Resour ce 1& llution Safe guards Recognizing 1^ Methane Po Carbon Pollu tion the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds 1% Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 3. HOUSE SCORES ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 61 % b c d e j 1) 1! 1$ f g h i 1@ 1# Change Military Resi lience to Clim ate Lifetime % Land and W ater Conser vation Fund (LWCF) Fracking Clea n Air Loopho le Attack on th e Clean Air Act and Sm Protections og 114th Con gre % National Oce an Policy 2016 ss Fossil Energy Bill Pro-environment action ✘ = Anti-environment action = Ineligible to vote i s = Absence (counts as negative) Delaying th e Environmen Resolution of tal Court Ca ses Mining Was te LCV SCORES = a Federal Cont rol Over Fede ral Waters Arctic Natio nal Wildlife Refuge Underminin g Public Land Managemen s and Wildlif t e Attack on Cl ean Air Prot ections Pesticides Po llution KEY Extreme Att ack on Clea n Water Prot (CRA) ections HOUSE VOTES WISCONSIN 1 Ryan, P. R N/A 0 11 THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HIS DISCRETION. 2 Pocan D 100 99 98 3 Kind* D 87 86 89 4 Moore** D 97 95 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 5 Sensenbrenner R 0 3 27 6 Grothman R 0 0 0 7 Duffy R 3 1 3 8 Ribble R 0 0 R 0 1 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ WYOMING AL Lummis * Representative Kind entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 12 and 42, which would have both been scored as pro-environment. **Representative Moore entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call vote 535, which would have been scored as pro-environment. 62 scorecard.lcv.org | 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV Carbon Pollu tion Recognizing 1^ 1& 1* 1( California W ater Resour ce National Mon uments Offshore Dril ling in 2! 2@ 2# 2$ s 2% ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ Marine Natio nal Monumen ts Endangered Species Act Riders Blocking Pr otections fo r Clean Wat er Clean Energy & Public Land s Sage Grous e Conservatio n Anti-Enviro Delaying Sa Disaster Fu nding for Fl int, M Attack on Pu bl urt Access Arctic Ocean 2* 2( 3) 3% 3^ 3& 3* 3! 3@ 3# 3$ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ic Protectio feguards ns ichigan nmental Sp ending Bill Drilling ronmental Co Attack on En vi 2& ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 3. HOUSE SCORES 2016 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org EPA Law En fo 2^ rcement the Eastern Gulf of Mex ico Attack on th e Endanger ed Species Act Gray Wolve s Methane Po 2) llution Safe guards the Cost of Climate Chan ge Protecting Fa rmworkers Pesticides from Dange rous Lead Poison ing Safeguar ds 1% Protecting O ur Forests Methane Po llution from Lands Drilling on Pu blic HOUSE VOTES THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HIS DISCRETION. a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 63 ADD MY VOICE TO AMERICA’S ENVIRONMENTAL MAJORITY Please visit scorecard.lcv.org to view the National Environmental Scorecard electronically, share it with friends and family, and learn more about how you can join with other environmental activists around the country who are making their voices heard from the statehouse to the White House. To make an additional contribution to LCV to support our efforts to turn your environmental values into national priorities, please use the enclosed envelope or visit www.lcv.org/donate. Sign up for LCV’s email updates at www.lcv.org and join LCV’s mobile action network by texting “LCV” to 877-877. Take action on a wide array of pressing environmental issues at www.lcv.org/act. Thank you for being the voice for the environment. OVER 40 YEARS OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ENVIRONMENTAL VOTES — all at the push of a button. You can now easily see how every member of Congress voted since the launch of LCV’s first Scorecard in 1971 as part of our new interactive National Environmental Scorecard at scorecard.lcv.org. LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS scorecard.lcv.org 1920 L STREET, NW, SUITE 800 · WASHINGTON, DC 20036 PHONE: 202.785.8683 · WWW.LCV.ORG This publication was designed and printed using 100% wind power and was printed on an alcohol-free press with soy-based inks on 100% recycled stock. www.instagram.com/LCVoters www.facebook.com/LCVoters www.twitter.com/LCVoters www.youtube.com/lcv2008
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz