Pipe Jacking An introduction to pipe jacking prepared by the Pipe Jacking Association Steven Cowell - Introduction J. Murphy & Sons Ltd. Estimating Manager - Tunnelling 26 years in the tunnelling industry Design, project delivery, planning & estimating roles Pipe Jacking Experience Hand excavation, road-header & back-hoe shields Open, EPB & slurry TBM’s Dewatering, ground treatment & compressed air Diameters from 1.0 to 2.5m Drive lengths to in excess of 500m Agenda Introduction to pipe jacking and micro-tunnelling Excavation methods and machine technology Drive lengths and diameters Jacking loads Jacking pipe materials Guidance and controls Site investigation and ground conditions Comparison with open trench and segmental tunnels – H&S, environmental and technical benefits PJA research Some Murphy pipe jacking examples What Is Pipe-jacking? The PJA definition “Pipe jacking is a technique for installing underground pipelines, ducts and culverts. Powerful hydraulic jacks are used to push specially designed pipes through the ground behind a shield at the same time as excavation is taking place with the shield.” Pipe diameters 0.45m to 2.4m commonly available in the UK Larger The diameters regularly used overseas term micro-tunnelling is used for the diameters 0.45m to 1m Jacks in excess of 1km in length undertaken in the UK Typical Construction Sequence Sink launch shaft, using whichever method is appropriate to the ground conditions. Sink reception shaft, using whichever method is appropriate to the ground conditions. Install jacking rig Set up system, control container, separation plant and pumps. Launch TBM and commence drive. Complete drive and recover TBM from reception shaft. Common Applications Sewerage and potable water construction Gas and water utilities Industrial pipelines (e.g. oil, chemical etc) Electricity and telecoms utilities Pedestrian subways Excavation Methods & Machine Technology Then - The good (bad!) old days: Manual excavation & loading Common up to early1990’s Health & safety issues HAVS Manual handling Occupational health Now - Very limited manual excavation Max. drive length 100m at >1.2m i.d. Max. 2 drives or 150m in one project Must seek HSE guidance Strict controls put in place Excavation Methods & Machine Technology Machines are available for pipe jacking in the majority of ground conditions Backhoe Excavator Road-header Earth Pressure Balancing TBM Open Face TBM Slurry TBM Machine Technology Backhoe Excavator For competent and stable ground conditions E.g. clay, dry / stable sands Suitable above water table / in dry ground However, can be used in conjunction with dewatering Machine Technology Open face cutter booms (road-header) For strong cohesive soils and weak to moderately strong rocks Operated above water table However, can be used in conjunction with dewatering Machine Technology Tunnel Boring Machines (TBM) - Open face For stable face conditions, including competent rock. Various cutting heads available to suit a broad range of ground conditions Suitable above water table / in dry ground Can be used in conjunction with dewatering Spoil removed via a conveyor belt or auger Machine Technology Earth Pressure Balance (EPM) TBM For less competent ground conditions Can be used in saturated ground Most suitable for cohesive soils E.g. clays, silts, etc. Excavation controlled by continuous flight auger Additives for face / spoil conditioning Machine Technology Slurry TBM For less competent ground conditions Can be used in saturated ground with high pressure Most suitable in granular soils E.g. sands, gravels, cobbles Excavation controlled by slurry system Microtunnelling Systems Fully guided machines Controlled from surface 1m i.d. and below Non man entry Similar to larger diameter pipe jacking machines Two options: Pressurised slurry Screw auger Drive Lengths and Diameters - HSE Recommendations Jacking Loads - Capacity Ultimate jacking load dependent upon: Pipe load capacity Jacking wall / restraint capacity Diameter, length & weight of pipes Ground & groundwater conditions Excavation method & control Cycle times / working patterns Alignment control Maintaining annulus Lubrication Main jacking station capacity Intermediate jacking stations (number / capacity) Jacking Loads - Reduction & Control Good practice should include: Correct choice of excavation method Open, EPB, slurry Control of groundwater Dewatering, Good alignment control & correction 1º = 50 to 90% reduction in pipe capacity Maintenance of cut annulus Cut diameter, TBM / shield over-cut Good lubrication Injection ground treatment points, Bentonite, water & polymers Correct choice of intermediate jacking stations Number required, capacity & position Jacking Pipe Materials Concrete jacking pipes BS EN 1916 Clay pipes: BS EN 296-7 & BS EN 12899: 2000 Steel pipes GRP pipes Guidance & Control Continuous & real-time Normally laser guidance Maintains accuracy Line, level & attitude Permits remote operation “Smart” targets Camera targets Giro compass (curves etc.) Site Investigation Ground Conditions Comparison with Open Trench Comparison with Open Trench Pipe jacking Comparison with Open Trench / Segmental Tunnelling Technical Comparison with Open Trench Minimal surface disruption and reinstatement Fewer utility diversions Comparison with Segmental Tunnelling Inherent strength of pipeline Smooth internal finish No secondary lining Less joints Watertight Control of settlement Comparison with Open Trench / Segmental Tunnelling Health & Safety Comparison with Open Trench Utility disruption minimised Public interface reduced Comparison with Segmental Tunnelling Reduced labour requirement Reduced installation time Reduced manual handling Non man entry where possible Comparison with Open Trench Environmental Avoid damage to services Reduced disruption Maintains highway integrity Carbon footprint 90% fewer vehicle movements Less spoil Less quarried material Carbon Footprint & PJA Calculator The PJA has worked with the North American Society of Trenchless Technology (NASTTBC) which is at an advanced stage of developing a carbon calculator for trenchless technology The carbon cost of traffic disruption has been studied by the Centre for the Advancement of Trenchless Technologies (CATT) and at the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Waterloo, Ontario Subsequently NASTTBC developed a carbon calculator tool through the University of British Columbia A combination of the reduction of traffic and trenchless construction outputs resulted in carbon reductions in excess of 90% compared to open trench construction. The PJA has developed a UK tailored product and incorporated TRL/Halcrow traffic data developed for NRSWA impact studies carried out for UKWIR The “Carbon Calculator” tool is available from the PJA website 90% Reduction in Carbon Emissions “When compared to open trench excavation pipe jacking can reduce construction related CO2 emissions by 90%.” PJA & University Research Two decades of research Oxford, Cambridge and Newcastle Universities involved Supported by water companies and the EPSRC Research both laboratory and site based Research Projects Laboratory testing of model jacked pipes Field testing of performance of pipes Finite element analysis of concrete jacking pipes Full scale testing of concrete pipes Soil conditioning and lubrication materials Field testing of soil conditioning and lubrication methods Slurry management (spoil disposal medium) Guide to Best Practice Soils investigation Excavation systems Temporary and permanent works Jacking lengths and friction forces Best installation practice Worked examples and checklists Additional Applications Box Sections Subways Roadways Other uses jacked arches bridge slide foundations Pipe-jacking Examples Preston 7 UIDs - Direct Pipe Installation Client: United Utilities Ground Condition: Silts, sands, clays, cobbles Dimensions of Drive: 2 drives x 1.5m i.d. x 865m Machine: Herrenknecht slurry TBM A new technique - used only14 times worldwide First use in the UK The longest drive to date worldwide 1st drive currently 80% complete Pipe-jacking Examples Preston 7 UIDs - City Works Client: United Utilities Ground Condition: Sandstone Pipe-jacking: 5 jacks x 1.5m i.d. 550m total Machine: Open face rock TBM Challenges:Restricted Abrasive urban location rock conditions Pipe-jacking Examples Lower Lea Valley Cable Tunnels Client: Olympic Delivery Authority Ground Condition: Sands / gravels and beneath a high water table Pipe-jacking: 2.52m i.d. x 70m length Machine: Iseki slurry machine Challenges:- Highly permeable sands and gravels with water close to ground level Pipe-jacking Examples Taplow Ground Condition: Chalk with high permeabilities Pipe-jacking: 1.5m i.d. x 140m Machine: Iseki slurry machine In Summary . . Engineering integrity Low capital costs Low maintenance Cost-effective Safe installation Environmental benefits Extensively used worldwide 0.45m to 3m diameters Long drive lengths Good engineering performance Thank you for listening. Any questions? Pipe Jacking Association 10 Greycoat Place, London SW1P 1SB Tel: 0845 070 5201 Fax: 0845 070 5202 Email: [email protected] Website: www.pipejacking.org
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz