Meeting the Challenge: Ohio Graduation Test for Science A Sampler of Items for Ohio’s Teachers Copyright © 2004, Ohio Department of Education Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 3 What is the purpose of the Ohio Graduation Tests? …………………………. 3 What science content and skills are assessed by the Ohio Graduation Tests? 3 What types of items are used on the Ohio Graduation Test for science? ……. 4 What are passage-based items and item clusters? ……………………………. 4 Will levels of understanding continue to be used on the Ohio Graduation Test for science? …………………………………………… 5 What reference materials and tools can students use while taking the science test? ……………………………………………………………….… … 6 Sample Items with Annotations ……………………………………………………… 7 Earth and Space Sciences ……………………………………………………. 8 Life Sciences ………………………………………………………………… 11 Physical Sciences ……………………………………………………………. 13 Science and Technology …………………………………………………….. 15 Scientific Inquiry …………………………………………………………….. 18 Scientific Ways of Knowing ………………………………………………… 21 Tips for Teachers …………………………………………………………………….. 23 Information Regarding Item Development and Scoring …………………………….. 25 Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 2 Introduction This document is designed as a tool for teachers and students. It contains information about the Ohio Graduation Test for science. Sample test questions and answers are provided for each of the item types that will be included in the assessment. They are not actual items that will be used on the test, but are illustrative of the structure and content of items that could appear on the test. Suggestions are also provided to assist teachers in preparing students for the assessment. A full-length practice test will be made available on the Ohio Department of Education Web site (www.ode.state.oh.us) in September of 2004. Additional resources and released items from operational forms of the OGT will be provided in future years. What is the purpose of the Ohio Graduation Tests? The Ohio Graduation Tests (OGT) are designed to ensure that all students who receive high school diplomas in Ohio demonstrate proficiency on a standards-based cumulative high school test, in addition to completing curricular requirements. The tests measure knowledge and skills as articulated in Ohio’s academic content standards by the end of 10th grade in five content areas: reading, writing, mathematics, social studies and science. The Ohio Graduation Tests also meet requirements of federal law for high school testing. What science content and skills are assessed by the Ohio Graduation Tests? The OGT for science is aligned with Ohio’s Academic Content Standards for K-12 Science using the 31 benchmarks for grades nine and 10. A listing of those benchmarks can be accessed on the Ohio Department of Education Web site. Every item on the Ohio Graduation Test for science assesses a benchmark for one of the six standards related to major topics within science, which are: • • • • • • Earth and Space Sciences; Life Sciences; Physical Sciences; Science and Technology; Scientific Inquiry; Scientific Ways of Knowing. Items that test Science and Technology, Scientific Inquiry and Scientific Ways of Knowing are within the content limits of Earth and Space Sciences, Life Sciences and Physical Sciences. Items that test Science and Technology, Scientific Inquiry, and Scientific Ways of Knowing will draw approximately equal content from Earth and Space Sciences, Life Sciences and Physical Sciences. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 3 What types of items are used on the Ohio Graduation Tests for science? Three types of items are used on the Ohio Graduation Tests: multiple-choice, short-answer and extended-response. The multiple-choice items present students with questions or incomplete statements. Student responses to multiple-choice items receive a score of 0 or 1. There are 32 multiple-choice items on the science test. Short-answer and extended-response items (constructed-response items) address aspects of the science academic content standards that are better assessed with constructed-response tasks rather than multiple-choice questions. They require students to generate, rather than recognize, a response. These items emphasize thinking skills and allow for different strategies in devising responses. Constructed-response items may ask the student to present comparisons, predictions, explanations, conclusions, inferences or descriptions pertaining to events, ideas or concepts. The number of possible points for constructed-response items is given at the end of each item. A short-answer item, for example, may ask a student to review a laboratory situation and organize a set of observations. Student responses to short-answer items receive a score of 0, 1 or 2. There are four short-answer items on the science test. The extended-response items offer students opportunities to demonstrate understanding in depth. For example, given the description of an ecosystem, students may be asked to discuss the impact of a large-scale environmental change. Student responses to extended-response items receive a score or 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4. There are two extended-response items on the science test. The operational portion of the OGT that counts for the student’s score will be comprised of 38 items and 48 points and may take up to two and one-half hours to complete. Items are distributed among three item formats on each form of the test according to the following guidelines: • • Each of the six standards is assessed by multiple-choice items and at least one constructed-response item (short-answer or extended-response) on every form of the test. Each operational form will typically include six field test items which do not contribute to the student’s score. What are passage-based test items and item clusters? Ohio’s academic content standards for science guide teaching and learning opportunities that develop students’ understanding of valid and technically precise science information; doing and understanding scientific inquiry and technological design; communicating understanding of science concepts and analysis of data; and applying scientific concepts. Standards-based science education engages all students with relevant, real-world activities that extend their thinking and communication skills and develop their science process skills. To provide students with a scientific context for demonstrating achievement of the benchmarks, passages that align to these expectations will be used with OGT science test items or item clusters. Items and item clusters that accompany passage information will comprise the majority of the items on the test. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 4 • • Passage lengths will be 1/3 to 2/3 of a page. The passages may contain a variety of media in combination (e.g., narrative, data table, graph, diagram, map, drawing and other graphic organizers). Media may be drawn from a variety of real-world applications (e.g., consumer use of materials in relation to properties of the materials) and/or technical sources (e.g., a partial periodic table). Will levels of understanding continue to be used on the Ohio Graduation Test for science? Items will no longer be classified by levels of understanding that were found on the Ninth-Grade Ohio Proficiency Test for science, i.e., acquiring, processing and extending scientific information. However, attention is given in test item development to explicit types of performance expectations (cognitive demand) for students’ science skills and understandings on the Ohio Graduation Test for science. To ensure a balance of ways for students to demonstrate science skills and understandings, each item on the OGT for science will focus on one of four types of performance expectations. They are generally described below: Recalling/Identifying Accurate Science (R) Items test student ability to accurately recall and/or identify fundamental science. Students may be asked to accurately recall and/or identify scientifically valid: • • • Facts; Concepts; Relationships. Communicating Understanding/Analyzing Science Information (C) Items test student ability to analyze scientific information and communicate in science with clarity, focus and organization. Students may be asked to: • • • • Organize, summarize and evaluate observations and data; Set up or complete computations and/or estimations; Choose among given models or representations in order to summarize observations and data; Make inferences from observations and data, and describe patterns and trends in observations, explain concepts or describe relationships (e.g., structure and function, cause and effect, systems and interactions, constancy and change). Demonstrating Investigation Processes of Science (D) Items test student ability to think scientifically. Students may be asked to: • Make observations and select appropriate tools; • Discuss procedures and methods of science; • Describe procedures or to make measurements; • Develop and evaluate questions or make predictions from information, including text, graphs, charts, tables, photographs, drawings or other graphic organizers; • Design, evaluate or revise a given investigation including the effects of different variables. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 5 Applying Concepts/Making Relevant Connections with Science (A) Items test student ability to apply science in the context of individuals and society. Students may be asked to: • • • Propose solutions and/or analyze consequences and alternatives; Use and integrate knowledge and concepts in new situations; Recognize scientific procedures appropriate to given real-world situations. Each test form will assign approximately equal numbers of points to each of the four types of performance expectations. What reference materials and tools can students use while taking the science test? Students will not be permitted to use reference materials, whether in print or electronic form (such as a thesaurus or spell-check software) unless specifically directed by their IEP or 504 plans. LEP students (students whose native language is not English) may have the use of a dictionary or translation dictionary. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 6 Sample Items with Annotations The sample items are organized with some of the benchmarks for grades nine through 10 in each of the six content standards that are to be assessed on the Ohio Graduation Tests. Multiple-choice, short-answer and extended-response items are included in the samples. Two items are provided per content standard. A discussion of each item includes the correct answer and highlights of the knowledge and skill it is intended to assess. The cognitive demand is also identified for each item. These test items come from a variety of sources, including released items from national and state assessments. Not all items may conform to the style that will be used on the Ohio Graduation Tests. Notes have been included with specific items to describe how the items differ from the style that will be used on the OGT. The sample items have not been subject to the same rigorous reviews and field testing as have the actual Ohio Graduation Test items. The items were not developed for use on the OGT and are only intended to represent the kinds of items that may appear on the Ohio Graduation Tests. It is important to remember that the sample items that follow represent a small portion of the knowledge and skills measured by the Ohio Graduation Tests. The full range of content and performance expectations of Ohio’s science benchmarks for grades nine through 10 is not reflected in the sample test items in this document. The total number of items to be used on operational forms of the test is not reflected in this document. Additional resources and actual test items from OGT operational test forms will be released in future years. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 7 Earth and Space Sciences Standard Benchmark E: Explain the processes that move and shape Earth's surface. Sample Multiple Choice Item: The layers of rocks in a geologic cross section provide a glimpse into the geologic history of Earth. Consider a formation of layered rock directly atop a formation of unlayered rock. Which of the following would most likely not be found in the two formations? A. A granite intrusion that penetrated the two formations at the same time B. Fossils that were formed in the two formations at the same time C. A fault that penetrated the two formations at different times D. Folds resulting from pressures that occurred in the two formations at different times Source: Adapted from High School Item 814, Council of Chief State School Officers SCASS Science Assessment Project. Copyright © 1997 by CCSSO, Washington D.C. Explanation: The answer is option B. Fossils that were formed in the two formations at the same time will most likely NOT be found in a formation of layered rock directly atop a formation of “unlayered” rock. Moreover, if students accurately recall that “un-layered” most likely implies igneous or metamorphic rock then the presence of “clear” fossil records in the “unlayered” rock are unlikely. All other options identify accurate scientific descriptions of potential/valid results (intrusion, fault, folds) of plate tectonic activity that may be found in both of the layers described. This example represents a Recalling/Identifying Accurate Science item. It requires students to accurately recall fundamental relationships and descriptions of processes (e.g., intrusions, faulting and folding) that help explain the results of plate tectonic activity, as well as distinguishing characteristics of scientific evidence in the geologic record (rock sequences, fossil distribution) that provide a glimpse into Earth’s geologic history. Please Note: Limited use will be made of negatives such as not and except in science test items. When used, such emphasis words will appear in boldface font according to the Ohio Style Guide. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 8 Earth and Space Sciences Standard Benchmark C: Explain the 4.5 billion-year-history of Earth and the 4 billion-year-history of life on Earth based on observable scientific evidence in the geologic record. Sample Extended-Response Item: One measure of geologic time is absolute time, which relates to the year something happened. Another is relative time, which relates to the order or sequence in which events occurred. The figure below shows a cross-section of five rock layers. You have been asked to determine the age of rock layer 5. Identify one method that could be used to determine the relative age and another method for determining absolute age of the rock layer. Describe how each method helps determine the age of the rock layer. Source: Adapted from the Pennsylvania STEEP Assessment Handbook, 2002 Explanation: Students’ responses must identify one method to determine relative age of a rock layer and describe the type of evidence of the age of the rock layer that the method provides. Their responses must do likewise for a method to determine absolute age of a rock layer. Methods to Determine Relative Age (May include one of the following) • law of superposition • law of included fragments Description of Method (Student responses must show understanding that relative time methods provide evidence of the sequence of events but not their actual dates of occurrence.) Observations in a series of undisturbed sedimentary rock; the oldest layer is on the bottom and the youngest on top. Observations of pieces of one rock found in another rock must be older than the rock in which it is found. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 9 • fossil correlation Methods to Determine Absolute Age (May include one of the following) • radioisotope dating • comparison to events that have known dates Observed rocks with the same set of fossils (called assemblages) are similar in age. Description of Type of Evidence (Student responses must show understanding that methods of determining absolute time provide evidence of the actual date of the event.) While student answers may vary they shall describe the use of radioisotopes with a long half-life. Students might also mention the carbon method as an accepted representation of radioactive decay methods even though the carbon-14 dating method is limited to about 50,000 years and is not usable for most rocks. Such events as volcanic eruptions can also be used when observing some rock layer sequences or core samplings. This example represents a Recalling/Identifying Accurate Science item. It requires students to accurately recall descriptions of methods for estimating geologic time that help explain how geologic time can be estimated by multiple methods. This includes accurately relating the method to the type or distinguishing characteristics of scientific evidence in the geologic record provided by the method. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 10 Life Sciences Standard Benchmark C: Explain the genetic mechanisms and molecular basis of inheritance. Sample Multiple-Choice Item: In certain breeds of dogs such as the Mexican Hairless, having hair is the result of having two dominant alleles for normal hair (NN). The heterozygous genotype produces a dog with very little hair and few teeth. Having two recessive (nn) genes results in a stillborn puppy. Which Punnett square shows the correct results of a cross between two heterozygous Mexican Hairless dogs? A. N n N Nn Nn n Nn nn N n N Nn nn N Nn nn N n N NN Nn n Nn nn N n N NN Nn N NN Nn B. C. D. Source: Adapted from Ohio HSGQE Practice Test, 2000 Explanation: The correct response is option C. The cross between two heterozygous Mexican Hairless dogs yields a genotype ration of 1:2:1 meaning 1 NN: 2 Nn: 1 nn. This item focuses on the students’ understanding of the concept of hereditary information including genes, alleles, genotypes, phenotypes and use of a Punnett square. In a heterozygous organism, the two alleles for a particular trait are different. The context of the item outlines the various genotypes and phenotypes possible. This example represents a Communicating Understanding/Analyzing Science Information item. It requires students to analyze the information provided in the item and select the Punnett Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 11 square that models/explains the probability of inherited traits of off-springs from the given genetic cross. Life Sciences Standard Benchmark F: Explain the structure and function of ecosystems and relate how ecosystems change over time. Sample Extended-Response Item: An ecosystem is greatly affected when a new species from another part of the world is introduced. The introduced species may increase in numbers very quickly because the ecosystem has no controls to keep the species’ population in check. The zebra mussel is native to the Caspian sea. The zebra mussel first appeared in the Great Lakes region around 1988, apparently in the ballast water (counterweight in the bottom of the ship) from ocean-going ships. Within a few years, the zebra mussel had reached very high concentrations in some areas. Describe two factors which made it possible for the zebra mussel to reach high concentrations in some bodies of water. Source: Adapted from the Ohio Ninth-Grade Proficiency Practice Test, 2000 Explanation: The student responses accurately describe the relationships between predator-prey relationships and restructured competition within the ecosystem to the high concentration of zebra mussels. This example represents a Recalling/Identifying Accurate Science item. It requires students to accurately recall two factors that relate to the resulting high concentrations of zebra mussels after some time following their introduction as a non-native species into the Great Lakes ecosystem. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 12 Physical Sciences Standard Benchmark A: Describe that matter is made of minute particles called atoms and atoms are comprised of even smaller components. Explain the structure and properties of atoms. Sample Multiple-Choice Item: Atoms can be considered the basic building blocks of matter. If atom X has 9 protons, 10 neutrons and 9 electrons and atom Y has 9 protons, 9 neutrons and 9 electrons, which of the following statements best describes how atom X and atom Y are related? Source: Connecticut 2002 Released Item A. X and Y are isotopes of the same element. B. X is an ion and Y is a neutral atom. C. X and Y are different elements. D. X is neon and Y is fluorine. Explanation: The correct response is option A. This item assesses a students understanding of atomic theory. Students should recognize that all atoms of the same element contain the same number of protons, and elements with the same number of protons may or may not have the same mass. Those with different masses (different numbers of neutrons) are called isotopes. This example represents a Communicating Understanding/Analyzing Science Information item. Students must accurately recall fundamental science facts about the atomic theory. But it requires students to analyze the content of the item in order to select the option that correctly summarizes that both atom X and Y have the same number of protons and electrons. Therefore atom X and Y are isotopes of the same element. Please Note: Decisions are made on a per test item basis whether a partial periodic table is included with an OGT science test item assessing the benchmark. Although this item uses the qualifier best, qualifiers are generally not used on the OGT. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 13 Physical Sciences Standard Benchmark D: Explain the movement of objects by applying Newton's three laws of motion. Sample Short-Answer Item: The diagram illustrates a large, net force that is constantly being applied to a ball. Students are observing any change in the motion of the ball, making measurements and recording the data. What measurements should the students make and record in order to describe the motion of the ball? In their report, how should the students organize (display) the data to describe the ball’s motion? Source: Adapted from Ohio HSGQE Practice Test, 2000 Explanation: Students identify the measurements needed to explain or analyze the motion of the ball. However, the item does not require students to provide a complete explanation or formal analysis of the motion. Students must examine the given circumstances in order to select the measurements that may be used to describe changes in relative direction and/or rate of motion. The successful response clearly and completely addresses each of the two parts of the task by first describing the “measurements” to make and record. These may include, but are not limited to, one of the following sets of measurements: Distance (or position) and time; Speed and time. In addition, in order to receive full credit, students must describe how to best organize the data to communicate the ball’s motion. Some examples may include, but are not limited to, organizing/displaying the measurements via a: Data table; Graph; Labeled illustration. This example represents a Communicating Understanding/Analyzing Science Information item. The measurements that must be made and recorded to describe the ball’s motion may be Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 14 based on students understanding or analyzing one of a variety of plausible cause and effect conditions based the information provided regarding the ball and force. (For example, one assumed condition is for the ball to accelerate uniformly, from rest in a straight line along a level floor. It may be inferred that the effects of rolling friction are negligible because of the observed smoothness of the ball and the floor. The floor appears to be level and it may be inferred that it remains level throughout the ball’s motion. However, the test question does not require students to provide this analysis as part of their response.) The item is similar to a Demonstrating Investigation Processes of Science item in that students are expected to identify the set of measurements to make in an investigation to describe the object’s motion. However, the test question does not focus students’ attention on describing experimental steps or choosing appropriate tools related to collecting data. Moreover, this item is more like a Communicating item because the item finally asks the students to choose among models or representations in order to summarize or organize (communicate) the information to describe the object’s motion. Science and Technology Standard Benchmark B: Explain that science and technology are interdependent: each drives the other. Sample Multiple-Choice Item: What technology was made possible by the discovery of the structure of DNA? A. B. C. D. Organ transplants Antibiotic production Gene splicing Artificial fertilization Source: Public Release, Maryland High School Assessment, Fall 2002 Explanation: The correct response is option C. This item assesses a student’s understanding of scientific advances and emerging technologies and how they impact society. Students should recognize how development of scientific knowledge leads to the creation of new technology and how technological advances allow for additional scientific accomplishments. All options are related to DNA, but only gene splicing is dependent upon the structure of DNA. This example represents a Recalling/Identifying Accurate Science item. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 15 Science and Technology Standard Benchmark A: Explain the ways in which the processes of technological design respond to the needs of society. Sample Extended-Response Item: Jim and Sandy each make a flashlight from identical batteries and bulbs. Sandy’s flashlight contains a reflector, while Jim’s does not. Sandy and Jim point their flashlights at the same wall 5 meters away. Identify two characteristics of the reflector that will enable Sandy’s flashlight to shine more light on a wall than Jim’s. Explain how each characteristic is critical to the success of Sandy’s design in shining more light on the wall. Source: Adapted from TIMSS Population 2 Item Pool. Copyright © 1994 by IEA, The Hague Explanation: Successful student responses clearly communicate two characteristics of the reflector. The characteristics may be related to the structure of the cone or the physical properties of the material from which the cone is made. The response directly relates the effect each characteristic has in causing more light to shine on the wall. For example: Reflector Characteristics angle of the cone-shaped surface size of the cone-shaped surface smoothness of the surface material non-transparent surface coating material Effects The angle of the reflector in Sandy’s flashlight would stop light from shining in all directions, including away from the wall, as in Jim’s flashlight. Or the student may say that the angle of the small metal backing of Jim’s bulb stops less light from shining in all directions. The large surface of the cone may keep more of the light from shining away from the wall, or the student may say that the small metal backing of Jim’s bulb does not cause as much of the light to shine on the wall as Sandy’s larger reflector. The smoother the surface of the reflector material, the more light will reflect at similar angles directed toward the wall. A more non-transparent material stops light lost to shining through the reflector. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 16 This example represents a Demonstrating Investigation Processes of Science item. Students must identify two key characteristics based on their observation of the textual and graphic depiction of a design/investigation scenario. These characteristics may be varied in the design/investigation of the flashlight that will shine the most amount of light on the wall. The item is similar to a Communicating Understanding/Analyzing Science Information item in that students must analyze potential cause and effect relationships. However, the test question is determined to be more like a Demonstrating Investigation Processes of Science item because it focuses students’ attention on explaining and/or evaluating the effects of different variables on the flashlight design goal of producing a flashlight to shine more light on the wall. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 17 Scientific Inquiry Standard Benchmark A: Participate in and apply the processes of scientific investigation to create models and to design, conduct, evaluate and communicate the results of these investigations. Sample Multiple-Choice Item: Within aquatic ecosystems there is a direct correlation between dissolved oxygen content and the population of various species of fish. Which relationship can correctly be inferred from the data presented in the graphs below? Source: New York State Education Department Test Sampler, 2000 A. As sewage waste increases, oxygen content increases. B. As the carp population increases, the whitefish population increases. C. As oxygen content decreases, carp population decreases. D. As oxygen content decreases, trout population decreases. Explanation: The correct response is option D. This item assesses a student’s ability to draw conclusions from investigations based on scientific knowledge and principles, and the use of logic and evidence (data). The graphic communicates the data collected in an investigation of the relationship between dissolved oxygen and the population of various species of fish. The item does not require students to provide evidence of their understanding of the specific biotic and/or abiotic factors contributing to the survival of the various species. The other options Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 18 communicate an incorrect interpretation of the data. This is a Communicating Understanding/Analyzing Science Information item. Students must analyze and interpret the data represented to choose a valid description of a potential relationship based on the data presented. Scientific Inquiry Standard Benchmark A: Participate in and apply the processes of scientific investigation to create models and to design, conduct, evaluate and communicate the results of these investigations. Sample Extended-Response Item: As tropical storms gain in strength, they are tracked by the weather service and by many people living in coastal areas. The chart below provides data on one hurricane. If the hurricane continues to move in the same direction and rate, on what day will the hurricane probably hit land? Use the chart and map below to explain how you were able to make this prediction. Date Aug. 31 Sept. 01 Sept. 02 Sept. 03 Latitude Degrees (north) 28 29 31 33 Longitude Degrees (west) 75 78 79 79 Wind Speed (mph) 70 65 65 70 Source: Ohio HSGQE Practice Test, 2000 Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 19 Explanation: This item assesses a student’s ability to use mathematical models to predict and analyze natural phenomena. Students must draw conclusions from investigations based on scientific knowledge and principles, the use of logic and evidence (data). The response makes an accurate prediction that the tropical storm will make landfall on or about September 4. Students may cite a slightly variable landing date. To validate this prediction, the response may explain certain conditions such as uncertainty in the exact time of day at which meteorological data are updated. In addition, in order to receive full credit, students must also explain the basis for their prediction which includes, but is not limited to: Identifying the pattern in the data (e.g., traveling two degrees latitude in a steady northern direction); Describing the process for determining the pattern in the data (e.g., logically consistent process such as graphing or directly analyzing the data in the chart); Linking the pattern to details of the chart and/or map that support the prediction. This is a Communicating Understanding/Analyzing Science Information item. Students must make a valid prediction, base an explanation of their prediction on their analysis, and interpret the patterns/trend in the data represented. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 20 Scientific Ways of Knowing Standard Benchmark B: Explain how scientific inquiry is guided by knowledge, observations, ideas and questions. Sample Multiple-Choice Item: Aristotle thought that a moving object would stop because its natural state was to be at rest. Newton thought that friction is a force that opposes all motion and eventually stops moving objects. Suppose you were coasting on a level surface on a bicycle and there was no friction. What would happen to your speed, according to Aristotle and Newton? Source: Ohio HSGQE Practice Test, 2000 A. Aristotle: slow and stop Newton: slow and stop B. Aristotle: maintain speed Newton: slow and stop C. Aristotle: maintain speed Newton: maintain speed D. Aristotle: slow and stop Newton: maintain speed Explanation: The correct response is option D. The key variable with an impact on students selecting the correct response is that there is no frictional force opposing the described motion. Under these conditions, the cyclist would maintain his or her speed according to Newton. According to Aristotle, since an object’s natural state is at rest, the cyclist would slow and eventually stop. This item is similar to a Communicating and Analyzing Science Information item in that students must select the option that accurately summarizes descriptions of the object’s motion, based on information provided and a cause-and-effect relationship. However, this example represents a Recalling/Identifying Accurate Science item. To choose the correct option and eliminate all incorrect options, students likely need to accurately recall the difference in how motion was described by Aristotle and Newton in the historical context of the development of scientific knowledge over time. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 21 Scientific Ways of Knowing Standard Benchmark C: Describe the ethical practices and guidelines in which science operates. Sample Short-Answer Item: Students are planning to investigate how the human heart rate changes with changes in activity. The teacher required students to present their plan for prior approval before conducting the investigation. The teacher approved the students’ experimental procedures using a timer for recording heart rate and a treadmill for changing heart rate. However, the students are not permitted to proceed until their plan follows ethical practices for experiments with human subjects. Describe two guidelines the students should add to their plan to assure ethical treatment for the human subjects. Source: Adapted from TIMSS Population 2 Item Pool. Copyright © 1994 by IEA, The Hague Explanation: Successful student responses clearly communicate two ethical guidelines based upon the nature of the potential risks inherent in the investigation and the use of human subjects. These include, but are not limited to, creating a record of informed consent, ensuring a prior physical (stress test) of each human subject and ensuring that the treadmill is in safe operating condition and that students and human subjects use the treadmill safely. This example represents a Demonstrating Investigation Processes of Science item. Students must identify two key guidelines to be added to the investigation based on their observation of the textual depiction of a design/investigation scenario. These guidelines may be varied by the context, methods and content of the investigation. The item is similar to a Communicating Understanding/Analyzing Science Information item in that students must analyze potential cause-and-effect relationships that may put human subjects at risk. However, the test question is determined to be more like a Demonstrating Investigation Processes of Science item because it focuses students’ attention on evaluating, explaining and/or the effects of different investigative variables on assuring ethical treatment of human subjects. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 22 Tips for Teachers What can teachers do to help students? Strategies for preparing students for success on the Ohio Graduation Test for science include: • Become familiar with the benchmarks for grades nine through 10 and the gradelevel indicators that represent progress toward achieving those benchmarks. All teachers, across the K-12 program, need to be cognizant of the specific benchmarks and the grade-level indicators used with the new test. Information about the test should also be shared with students and parents. • Discuss relationships between benchmarks and grade-level indicators. A key component of curriculum design and instructional planning using Ohio’s Academic Content Standards: K−12 Science is the relationship between the benchmarks and grade-level indicators. The benchmarks serve as the focal points for assessment items. The grade-level indicators contain the content and skills that inform, support and provide substance for assessment of the benchmarks. Discussions about curriculum and instruction must integrate the expectations represented by the benchmarks with the content and skills incorporated within the grade-level indicators. Instruction cannot focus solely upon the benchmarks or upon the grade-level indicators. • Match instructional strategies, materials and assessments to identified student learning experiences. In addition to providing instruction on the topics included within the grade-level indicators, classroom experiences should also afford students the opportunity to examine the topics and practice the skills in the manner expressed in the indicators. For instance, if an indicator states that students should “evaluate a design for a device or process”, classroom instruction should not only define and provide examples of criteria, but develop skills related to determining criteria. The instruction should also model how to use criteria and give students the chance to develop criteria, apply the criteria and decide if the criteria are useful in accomplishing a given task. The classroom materials and assessments should also fit with the grade-level indicator. Expectations contained in the benchmarks should likewise be reflected in classroom instruction. • Provide required learning experiences based on the benchmarks and grade-level indicators to all students. The local course of study and its implementation should be reviewed and adjusted, as needed, to ensure all students have access to the full preparation for the Ohio Graduation Test for science. The depth and breadth of the content and instructional experiences are critical in determining the role a specific course or grade level makes in addressing the benchmarks and grade-level indicators. Course titles or topic lists alone are not sufficient for determining if students have access to the instruction needed to be successful on the Ohio Graduation Test for science. • Practice selecting, developing and administering a variety of assessment strategies and items. Multiple strategies for assessing student progress and achievement should be included as part of science classes. Particular attention should be given to incorporating assessment items that require student-generated responses. Professional development in classroom assessment should include issues related to identifying and writing appropriate assessment items and tasks, implementing new Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 23 assessment strategies, applying scoring guidelines and making inferences about student learning. • Promote self-assessment of student work by providing scoring guides or checklists for students to use when constructing responses and generating products or demonstrations. Some specific tips and suggestions for teachers include: Conducting scientific inquiry that requires scientific reasoning applied to practical problems is the best possible preparation that students can have before taking the test. Mere memorization of scientific definitions and facts is inadequate preparation for what they will see on the test. The following are some key aspects that will best prepare students. • Provide students practice in applying science concepts, big ideas, and process skills to content in various situations. Science content and process may be assessed in novel context. • Provide students opportunities to propose or evaluate a scientific investigation of a physical, living, or earth and space system. Evaluations of conclusions based on scientific data are an important indicator of scientific understanding. Encourage students to use precise, detailed language (scientific terminology is best) and logical sequence in their explanations. A good way to develop this skill is to have students take detailed notes while conducting experiments or observations. Have students reflect and report on their observations and conclusions, including how to revise an investigation to test for a different variable. • Focus students’ planning for an investigation on recognizing potential health and safety hazards involved in scientific investigations and everyday activities. Safety is an important facet of scientific inquiry and procedures. They need to know about safe procedures and basic protective gear and its use. This information should be incorporated into any science activity. • Help students practice developing an eye for detail on test items. Keen observational and thinking skills are extremely important. Students will be asked to make inferences and justify explanations based upon information and observations of phenomena given in test item passages. • Assist students becoming comfortable interpreting data and other information provided in tables, graphs, diagrams, charts and drawings that are commonly used to relay scientific information in passages and test items. They should be able to explain their reasoning and/or show logical processes (e.g., solution steps, patterns, extrapolation, relationships) for making inferences or in evaluating conclusions from such information. Students should be prepared to provide accurate answers, including complete, appropriate labels (e.g., units, direction). • Prepare students to accurately display scientific information (e.g., correctly plot data and draw the line of best fit on a graph; show the correct direction and/or angle on motion and force diagrams and drawings) using appropriate conventions. Using appropriate conventions for displaying information includes, but is Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 24 not limited to, drawing complete graphs with appropriately scaled and labeled axes as well as completely labeling data tables, diagrams, charts and drawings. • Provide, develop and discuss models of acceptable and unacceptable responses to short-answer and extended-response items. Discuss what makes these responses more or less complete and have students suggest revisions. Involve students in creating and using context-specific rubrics to evaluate responses to classroom-developed tasks. Information Regarding Item Development and Scoring Test items go through a rigorous development and review process before qualifying for inclusion in the Ohio Graduation Test for science. Using a blueprint developed by the Ohio Department of Education, an assessment development contractor writes test items aligned to the ninth- and 10th-grade benchmarks of the Ohio science academic content standards. The draft blueprint and items are reviewed by a content advisory committee, which includes parents, educators, community members and business representatives, to ensure that proposed items accurately align with the science benchmarks. The content advisory committee is primarily composed of teachers at the appropriate grade levels. A fairness/sensitivity review committee reviews the questions to ensure that they are not biased in any way and do not inquire about individuals’ moral or social values or beliefs. This committee is also composed of parents, educators, community members and business representatives. Science consultants from the Ohio Department of Education and content experts from the assessment development contractor advise these committees and provide additional review for content accuracy. At any point during this process, an item may be returned to the assessment development contractor for revision or may be rejected without revision. Accepted draft test items are field tested to collect data on how satisfactorily each item measures student achievement of the science benchmarks. Field tests are conducted with representative student populations across the state. Multiple-choice items are scored by the scoring contractor according to the key approved by the content advisory committee. Shortanswer and extended-response items are sent to a rangefinding committee composed of Ohio teachers, where samples of student responses for each question are reviewed. Under the guidance of the assessment scoring contractor and the Ohio Department of Education, the committee assembles a bank of student responses for use as training materials for scorers. Results of the field test are reviewed by the assessment development contractor, the Ohio Department of Education as well as the fairness/sensitivity and content advisory committees. Based on field test results, items may be rejected, sent back to the assessment development contractor for revision, or accepted as written. Accepted items are entered into the pool of available OGT items. The assessment scoring contractor screens potential test scorers for appropriate educational backgrounds to score the short-answer and extended-response items on operational forms of the test. The contractor then designs training sessions for the selected scorers. Representatives from the Ohio Department of Education and the rangefinding committee attend these training sessions, helping trainers and scorers understand the structure and intent of the scoring guidelines for the constructed-response items. During training and scoring, the contractor monitors scorer performance to ensure accuracy. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 25 To Obtain Further Information on: • The Ohio Graduation Tests o Contact the Office of Assessment – (614) 466-0223. o Consult the Ohio Department of Education Web page – www.ode.state.oh.us • Academic Content Standards o Contact the Office of Curriculum and Instruction – (614) 466-1317. o Consult the Ohio Department of Education Web page – www.ode.state.oh.us Ohio Department of Education Offices of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment 25 S. Front Street, Mail Stop 509 Columbus, OH 43215-4183 The Ohio Department of Education does not discriminate on a basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, or disability in employment or the provision of services. Ohio Graduation Test for Science – Test Sampler, July 2004 26
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz