Mr. Darren Timothy, Senior Adviser, Office of Innovative Program

Tolling and Road User Charges in
the U.S.
October 28, 2015
Presentation to the Japan Road Congress
Darren Timothy, Senior Technical Advisor
Federal Highway Administration
2
Outline
• Highway Finance in the U.S.
• Tolling in the U.S.
• Mileage-Based User Fees
Highway Finance in the U.S.
4
Revenue Sources for Highways
Highways in the U.S. are funded from a variety of sources
Government Revenue Sources for Highways, 2012
Highway Revenue, Billions of Dollars
Source
Federal
State
Local
Total
Percent
User Charges
Motor-Fuel Ta xes
$28.1
$32.8
$1.0
$61.9
28.6%
Motor-Vehi cl e Ta xes a nd Fees
$5.8
$22.1
$1.8
$29.7
13.7%
Tol l s
$0.0
$11.8
$1.8
$13.5
6.2%
Subtotal
$33.8
$66.7
$4.6
$105.2
48.6%
Other
Property Ta xes a nd As s es s ments
$0.0
$0.0
$10.3
$10.3
4.8%
Genera l Fund Appropri a tions
$6.1
$6.7
$31.4
$44.1
20.4%
Other Ta xes a nd Fees
Inves tment Income a nd Other Recei pts
$0.4
$2.5
$8.9
$11.6
$5.5
$6.8
$14.8
$20.9
6.9%
9.6%
Bond Is s ue Proceeds
$0.0
$12.4
$8.9
$21.3
9.8%
Subtotal
$9.0
$39.5
$62.9
$111.4
51.4%
Total Revenues
$42.8
$106.3
$67.5
$216.6
100.0%
5
Highway-User Revenues
Highway-user revenues are also used for public transit and
other purposes
6
Revenue Sources for Highways
The share of total highway revenues drawn from highway
users has been smaller in recent years
7
Revenue Sources for Highways
Revenues to the Federal Highway Trust Fund have not kept
pace with expenditures in recent years
8
Highway Expenditures
Most expenditures for highway capital, operations, and
maintenance are made by State and local governments
9
Highway Expenditures
Most Federal highway funding is provided to States for capital
expenditures
Tolling in the U.S.
11
Tolling in the U.S. Today
• 5,433 miles of toll roads, bridges, and tunnels in
the U.S.
 Includes 150 toll bridges and tunnels
• Tolls account for 6.2 percent of total revenues
used for highways
11
12
Toll Facilities in the U.S. Today
12
13
Tolling as a Revenue Source
• Tolling is increasingly being considered as a
potential revenue source for transportation
investment in the U.S.
 Difficulty in raising revenues from traditional sources
to pay for major capital projects
 Ability to directly charge users who benefit from the
facility
 Use of variable tolling for congestion management
 Electronic toll collection reduces need for toll booths,
eases congestion and safety concerns
14
Tolling in the U.S. Today
• Recent Developments
 New toll roads in large metropolitan areas
 New and converted tolled express/HOT lanes on
existing highways
 Increasing use of electronic toll collection
 Public-private partnerships for developing new toll
facilities
 Combining toll revenues and public funds to finance
new facilities
14
15
Tolling as a Revenue Source
• Revenue potential depends on many factors
 Travel demand characteristics
• Traffic volumes
• Income and demographics
• Land use
 Quality and availability of alternatives and
connections
• Interchanges / intersecting routes
• Parallel routes
• Other modes
 Ease of collection and enforcement
 Toll rate structure
16
Public Policy Issues in Tolling
• Potential impacts of tolling
 Traffic diversion from toll roads to other facilities
 Lack of toll-free alternatives
 Geographic and demographic equity
 Increased complexity of the highway system to users
 Interoperability of electronic toll collection systems
17
Public Policy Issues in Tolling
• Revenues and Costs
 Perception of “paying twice” for roads
 Accountability in setting toll rates and policies
 Administrative costs
 Use of toll revenues on other facilities or for nonhighway purposes
 Reliability of revenue forecasts
18
Federal Tolling Policy
• Tolling is generally prohibited on highways
funded by the Federal government
• Exceptions allowed through special
programs and provisions
19
Tolling in the U.S. – Early History
• Toll roads and bridges were once common in the U.S.
 30-50,000 miles built between 1790 and 1900
 Long Island Motor Parkway (1908)—first superhighway for
automobiles
• Federal-aid Road Act (1916)
 “All roads constructed under the provisions of this act shall be
free of tolls of all kinds”
20
Tolling and the Interstate Highway System
• Toll Roads and Free Roads Report to Congress (1939)
projected that interregional toll roads could not pay for
themselves
• Some states developed high quality, limited access highways
financed by tolls (1940s-1950s)
• Federal-Aid Highway Act (1956)
• Created funding mechanism (primarily from Federal motor fuel taxes) to
build the Interstate System
• Planned or existing toll roads incorporated into Interstate System if they
met the design standards, but Federal funds could not be used for their
construction
21
Federal Tolling Programs
• Mainstream Programs (broadly available)
 Use of Federal funds on existing toll facilities
 Tolling of new capacity (new roads/bridges, added lanes)
 Reconstruction of bridges and non-Interstate highways
 Conversion of HOV lanes to HOT lanes
• Pilot Programs (limited participation)
 Congestion pricing on existing highways
 Reconstruction of Interstate highways
22
Federal Tolling Program Requirements
• Limitations on the use of toll revenues
• Debt service / return on private investment
• Operation / maintenance / improvement of the toll facility
• Other surface transportation improvements (if toll facility is adequately
maintained)
• Mitigation measures for low-income drivers*
• Performance requirements (HOT lanes only)
• Application and USDOT approval (Pilot programs only)
• No regulation of toll rates
Mileage-Based User Fees
24
Mileage-Based User Fees
• Mileage-based user fees (MBUFs) are seen as a potential
alternative to the use of fuel taxes as a primary highway
system funding source in the U.S.
 Concerns about long-term viability of fuel taxes due to
increasing fuel economy and use of alternate fuel vehicles
 Near term difficulties in raising fuel tax rates
 More directly align highway user charges with highway
system use
25
MBUF Research in the U.S.
• Research and demonstration projects have been
conducted at the State level
• Examples: Washington (2006); Univ. of Iowa (2007); Oregon (2007, 2013,
2015); Minnesota (2013)
• Several other states exploring research and pilot programs
• Legislation passed in the U.S. Senate would fund research
on user-based alternative revenue mechanisms
 Study two or more such mechanisms
 Provide recommendations on adoption and implementation
 Would provide $115 million in funding over six years for grants to States or
other entities
 Legislation has not yet been passed in U.S. House of Representatives or
enacted into law
26
Policy and Implementation Issues
• The Senate-passed research program would address
several key policy and technical issues in MBUFs
 Hurdles including implementation, interoperability, and public acceptance
 Protection of personal privacy
 Use of third party vendors to collect fees
 Equity concerns (income groups, geographic areas, urban/rural)
 Ease of compliance for different users
 Reliability and security of technology
 Flexibility and choices among various technology and payment options
 Administration costs
 Ability to audit and enforce user compliance
27
Oregon Road Usage Charge Program
• Began July 1, 2015
• Allows up to 5000 participants (900 enrolled through Sept 2015)
 Limitations on the number of low MPG vehicles in the program
• Program Operation
 Rate set at 1.5 cents per mile
 On Board Units collect and report mileage and fuel consumption data
 Participants receive a bill with mileage charges and credit for State fuel tax
paid (30 cents per gallon)
• Vendor Choices
 Two commercial vendors provide GPS-enabled devices (track in/out-ofstate vehicle use) and value added services
 One public vendor tracks only mileage and fuel consumption
28
Contact Information
Darren Timothy
Senior Technical Advisor
Office of Innovative Program Delivery
Federal Highway Administration
(202) 366-4051
[email protected]
Questions and Answers