Open Inflation Reviving - a signature of string theory landscape?Misao Sasaki (YITP, Kyoto University) CosKASI Symposium 16 April 2014 2 1. Era of precision cosmology Big Bang theory has been firmly established wavelength[mm] COBE/FIRAS CMB spectrum at T=2.725K 200 sigma error-bars frequency[GHz] 3 Strong evidence for Inflation Planck 2013 T (n1 )T (n2 ) 2 1 C P (cos ). 0 4 • almost scale-invariant spectrum: nS 0.960 0.0073 (68% CL) • highly Gaussian fluctuations: local f NL 2.7 5.8 (68% CL) only to be confirmed (by tensor modes?!) 4 Discovery(?) of primordial GWs BICEP2 (2014) spacetime vacuum fluctuations from inflation B-mode polarization in CMB anisotropy • E-mode (even parity) • B-mode (odd parity) = cannot be produced from density fluctuations 55 BICEP2 result sky map B-mode spectrum If confirmed, it “proves” primordial inflation & quantum gravity! 6 What’s next? 7 2. String theory landscape Lerche, Lust & Schellekens (’87), Bousso & Pochinski (’00), Susskind, Douglas, KKLT (’03), ... There are ~ 10500 vacua in string theory • vacuum energy rv may be positive or negative • typical energy scale ~ MP4 • some of them have rv <<MP4 which ? 8 Is there any way to know what kind of landscape we live in? Or at least to know what kind of neighborhood we live in? 9 A universe jumps around in the landscape by quantum tunneling • it can go up to a vacuum with larger rv ( dS space ~ thermal state with T =H/2 ) • if it tunnels to a vacuum with negative rv , it collapses within t ~ MP/|rv|1/2. • so we may focus on vacua with positive rv: dS vacua rv 0 Sato et al. (’81) 10 Most plausible state of the universe before inflation is a dS vacuum with rv ~ MP4. dS = O(4,1) O(5) ~ S4 false vacuum decay via O(4) symmetric (CDL) instanton O(4) Coleman & De Luccia (‘80) O(3,1) inside bubble is an open universe bubble wall 2 x 2 R2 false vacuum t 2 x 2 R 2 11 creation of open universe ds vacuum :O(4,1) Euclidean bubble: O(4) open universe nucleated bubble: O(3,1) =open universe dS vacuum bubble wall 12 3. Open inflation in the landscape universe is inside nucleated bubble = open universe • observational data imply 1-W < 10-2 : almost flat • two possibilities 1. inflation after tunneling was long enough (N>>60) 1 W0 = 1 “flat universe” signatures from bubble collisions? Sugimura, Yamuchi & MS (2012) last scattering surface us colliding bubbles 13 2. inflation after tunneling was short enough (N = 50 ~ 60) 1 W 102 ~ 103 “open universe” 0 any signatures in large angle CMB anisotropies? Here we argue that we are already seeing a couple of such signatures on large angle CMB dipolar statistical anisotropy tensor-scalar ratio: Planck vs BICEP2 4. Dipolar statistical anisotropy T T 1 A cos T T 0 l l 1Cl l 14 15 dipole asymmetry observed by WMAP/Planck asymmetry of Cl in the direction of ell=1 dipole asymmetry of Cl in the direction maximizing the asymmetry 16 Planck XXIII T T 1 A cos T T iso A 0.07 creation of open universe & supercurvature mode wavelength > curvature radius “supercurvature” mode open universe dS vacuum bubble wall 17 18 Gradient of a field over the horizon scale = Super-curvature mode in open inflation observable universe may modulate the amplitude of perturbation depending on the direction. 19 a viable model Kanno, MS & Tanaka (2013) L 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f V ( f ) s m s f s c mc c s 2 2 2 2 (s, c )-sector ~ "axion"-like f : inflaton s : isocurvature mode with super-curvature perturbation s c : curvaton HF : Hubble at false vacuum H F2 ms2 H 2 curvature perturbation is almost Gaussian f 2 H 2 , c 2 H2 2 f (s s ) V (f ) mc2 20 2 2 2 H 2 PS (k ) Nf H N c 2 f (s s ) k / a H dipolar modulation through f (s ) c-field is a “free” field (no direct coupling to inflaton) no significant non-Gaussianity, nor quadrupole s-field eventually dies out ( because ms ~ H ) modulation is larger on larger scales = consistent with Planck 2013 21 5. r-controversy?:Planck vs BICEP2 r < 0.1 if ns=const. r ~ 0.2 resolved if dns /dlnk<0 (running spectral index) broken spectrum is more favored than running Abazajian et al. (2014) 22 observational indication running spectrum broken spectrum break H0-1 curvature radius? broken spectrum is favored Bayesian evidence Abazajian et al., arXiv:1403.5922 [astro-ph.CO] 23 fast-roll phase in open inflation curvature dominant phase right after tunneling, H is dominated by curvature: a t, f V f 4 V (f ) r 1 H 2 2 3M P a 2 t fast-roll phase fast-roll phase kinetic energy grows until slow-roll phase f H *1 f2 V at t* 2.3 2 2 V M P2 V V : “slow-roll” parameter 2 V for V ~ 0.01, there is N =Ht ~ 20 e-folds of fast-roll phase 24 theoretical (qualitative) predictions • suppression of curvature perturbation during first V1/2 e-folds (↔large scales) of open inflation N ~ H2 PS ( k ) : 2 2 2 (2 ) M pl H 2 H ~ V • no suppresion in tensor perturbation 8H 2 PT (k ) = (2 )2 M pl2 PT 16 V r 16 ~ PS • curvature scale at the end of fast-roll phase Rcurv t* 1/2 2.3 ~ 20 if V 0.01 V 1 1 H H* WK ~ 0.01 25 scalar & tensor spectrum in open inflation Linde, MS & Tanaka (1999) scalar tensor (no suppression) scalar suppression begins indeed at smaller scales curvature radius H0-1 if WK ≈ 0.003 26 6. Summary 1. Dipolar statistical anisotropy requires a non-standard inflation scenario Modulation of the fluctuation amplitude by supercurvatue mode in open inflation 2. Tension between Planck & BICEP2 may be resolved if Ps(k) is suppressed on large scales Suppression due to fast-roll phase at the beginning of in open inflation These may be signatures from string landscape 27 • embedding models in string theory? • any other testable predictions? • other features in CMB? LSS? ...? We are beginning to test string landscape!
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz